Mini Review ARTICLE
HDL particle number and size as predictors of cardiovascular disease
- National Institute for Health and Medical Research (INSERM), UMR-ICAN 1166, Pitié-Salpétrière University Hospital, University of Pierre and Marie Curie -Paris 6, Paris, France
Previous studies indicate that reduced concentrations of circulating high-density lipoprotein (HDL) particles can be superior to HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C) levels as a predictor of cardiovascular disease. Measurements of HDL particle numbers, therefore, bear a potential for the improved assessment of cardiovascular risk. Furthermore, such measurement can be relevant for the evaluation of novel therapeutic approaches targeting HDL. Modern in-depth analyses of HDL particle profile may further improve evaluation of cardiovascular risk. Although clinical relevance of circulating concentrations of HDL subpopulations to cardiovascular disease remains controversial, the negative relationship between the number of large HDL particles and cardiovascular disease suggests that assessment of HDL particle profile can be clinically useful. Reduced mean HDL size is equally associated with cardiovascular disease in large-scale clinical studies. Since HDL-C is primarily carried in the circulation by large, lipid-rich HDL particles, the inverse relationship between HDL size and cardiovascular risk can be secondary to those established for plasma levels of HDL particles, HDL-C, and large HDL. The epidemiological data thereby suggest that HDL particle number may represent a more relevant therapeutic target as compared to HDL-C.
The inverse relationship between circulating concentrations of high density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol (HDL-C) and cardiovascular risk is firmly established. This relationship is thought to reflect multiple cardioprotective properties of HDL, which primarily include its capacity to eﬄux cholesterol from peripheral cells but may also involve antioxidative, anti-inflammatory, anti-apoptotic, anti-thrombotic, anti-infectious, and anti-diabetic activities (Camont et al., 2011). Low levels of HDL-C are frequently accompanied by defective HDL functionality as shown in patients with established cardiovascular disease and with different forms of dyslipidemia (Kontush and Chapman, 2006b; Riwanto and Landmesser, 2013). Measurements of HDL-C levels are simple, can easily be performed in a clinical setting and might, therefore, provide an estimate for defective HDL function.
However, considerable residual risk exists even at high plasma levels of HDL-C, suggesting that other HDL-associated metrics might provide better assessment of the relationship between HDL metabolism and cardiovascular disease. Moreover, a series of recent large-scale HDL-C-raising trials failed to reduce cardiovascular disease, additionally demonstrating limitations of HDL-C as a therapeutic target. Metrics of HDL functionality represent an obvious alternative to HDL-C (Hovingh et al., 2015); their reliable assessment is, however, challenging in the clinical routine, reflecting their limited use at present. Other, than HDL-C, biomarkers of HDL metabolism frequently employed in the clinic include circulating levels of apolipoprotein A-I (apoA-I, the major HDL protein), concentrations of HDL particles, and mean HDL size. Several large-scale trials have systematically evaluated potential clinical value of these biomarkers. The present article reviews data obtained for the associations between cardiovascular risk and circulating concentrations (numbers), and mean size of HDL particles in humans.
Total Number of HDL Particles
Several studies evaluated the relationship of cardiovascular risk with total number of HDL particles in the circulation (Table 1).
TABLE 1. Clinical trials, which evaluated relationships between high density lipoprotein (HDL) particle number and cardiovascular disease.
In a nested, case–control, secondary prevention Veterans Affairs High-Density Lipoprotein Intervention Trial (VA-HIT), elevated number of HDL particles was a significant predictor of reduced risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) in subjects treated with gemfibrozil or placebo (Otvos et al., 2006). Indeed, increment in total HDL particle number of 1 standard deviation (SD) decreased CHD risk by 29% during a 5-year follow-up (p = 0.0001). By contrast, circulating HDL-C and apoA-I levels were unable to predict CHD events in this study (risk reduction of 5%, p = 0.42 and 9%, p = 0.18, respectively).
Similar results were obtained in a primary prevention Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial (MRFIT) of CHD mortality in men at high risk of CHD (Kuller et al., 2007). In two groups of middle-aged men who died or did not die of CHD over 18 years of follow-up, elevated total HDL particle number at baseline significantly reduced CHD death by 50% for the comparison between the top and the bottom quartiles. As in the VA-HIT study, levels of HDL-C were not associated with the endpoint (risk reduction of 0% for the same comparison).
In a case–control European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC)-Norfolk study of apparently healthy men and women, total HDL particle concentration at baseline was significantly diminished in CHD cases relative to controls (El Harchaoui et al., 2009). As a consequence, HDL particle concentrations in the top quartile decreased coronary artery disease (CAD) risk by 50% relative to the bottom quartile following adjustment for plasma apoB and triglyceride levels.
In a randomized Heart Protection Study (HPS) trial of statin and antioxidant therapy in high-risk men and women, increment in total HDL particle number of 1 SD was associated with a significant risk reduction of 11% for major occlusive coronary events after adjustment for low density lipoprotein (LDL) particle number (Parish et al., 2012). Associations between cardiovascular disease and plasma HDL-C and apoA-I levels were slightly weaker, albeit significant (risk reduction of 9% for each of them). Interestingly, inverse associations of other cardiac events assessed in this study with biomarkers of HDL metabolism were only significant for HDL particle number (risk reduction of 16%) but not for HDL-C and apoA-I levels (risk reduction of 6 and 8%, respectively).
In the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) which evaluated men and women without baseline CHD or lipid altering therapy, elevated number of HDL particles revealed an inverse association with both incident CHD events (significant risk reduction of 30% per 1 SD increment in the particle number) and carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT; Mackey et al., 2012). These associations were not affected by adjustment for LDL particle number (risk reduction of 32% per 1 SD increment in the particle number). Plasma HDL-C concentrations revealed similar associations with CHD (significant risk reduction of 26%) and cIMT, which were, however, markedly attenuated after adjustment for plasma levels of atherogenic lipoproteins (non-significant risk reduction of 3%).
In a randomized Justification for the Use of statins in Prevention: an Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin (JUPITER) which enrolled subjects without cardiovascular disease assigned to either rosuvastatin or placebo, on-treatment HDL particle number was significantly associated with a composite cardiovascular endpoint in subjects randomized to the statin (risk reduction of 27% per 1 SD following adjustment for traditional cardiovascular risk factors; Mora et al., 2013). Similar associations evaluated for circulating HDL-C and apoA-I levels were not significant (risk reductions of 18 and 14%, respectively). In subjects randomized to placebo, on-treatment concentrations of HDL particles, HDL-C, and apoA-I revealed similar inverse association with the endpoint (significant risk reductions of 19, 25, and 21%, respectively). Interestingly, the association between on-treatment HDL particle numbers and cardiovascular endpoint remained significant after adjustment for HDL-C levels in this study.
Particle Numbers of Large vs. Small HDL
HDL particles are highly heterogeneous in structure, composition, metabolism, and function. Distinct HDL subpopulations might, therefore, exert differential effects on atherosclerosis (Camont et al., 2011). As a consequence, plasma concentrations of specific HDL subpopulations can be hypothesized to reveal stronger associations with cardiovascular risk as compared to total HDL particle number.
NMR measurements allow distinguishing between large (size 9.4–14.0 nm), medium (8.3–9.3 nm), and small (7.3–8.2 nm) HDL particles (Otvos, 2002). Among these HDL subpopulations, levels of large HDL frequently display inverse relationships with cardiovascular risk in univariate analyses, whereas concentrations of small HDL particles typically reveal positive correlations with the risk (Kuller et al., 2002; Rosenson et al., 2002; Garvey et al., 2003; Festa et al., 2005; Goff et al., 2005; Kathiresan et al., 2006; Otvos et al., 2006; Mora et al., 2007, 2009; van der Steeg et al., 2008; El Harchaoui et al., 2009). Circulating concentrations of large and small HDL particles as well as those of large HDL particles and total LDL particles as measured by NMR are, however, known to be negatively correlated. Such multiple confounding renders data interpretation controversial, complicating proper assessment of the relative roles of distinct HDL subpopulations in cardioprotection (Goff et al., 2005; Jeyarajah et al., 2006; Mora et al., 2007, 2009; El Harchaoui et al., 2009).
As a comparison, particle concentrations of HDL subpopulations can be assessed by the ion mobility assay which readily separates small (7.7–10.5 nm) and large (10.5–14.5 nm) HDL (Musunuru et al., 2009). Such evaluation reveals comparable associations of small and large particles with cardiovascular risk (hazard ratios per 1 SD of 0.78 and 0.75, respectively; Musunuru et al., 2009).
The inverse relationship between particle number of large HDL and cardiovascular disease is further consistent with data on plasma levels (as mg apoA-I/dl) of HDL subpopulations separated by 2D gel electrophoresis. Indeed, circulating concentrations of large alpha-1 HDL are consistently associated with reduced cardiovascular risk (Asztalos and Schaefer, 2003a,b; Asztalos et al., 2003, 2004; Schaefer and Asztalos, 2007a,b). On the other hand, levels of small HDL particles assessed by this methodology are frequently elevated in CHD patients (Asztalos and Schaefer, 2003a,b; Asztalos et al., 2003; Lamon-Fava et al., 2008). Importantly, the power of large alpha-1 HDL to predict CHD risk is typically superior to that of HDL-C in these studies (Asztalos et al., 2003, 2005; Lamon-Fava et al., 2008).
Mean HDL Size
Mean HDL size can be regarded as an integrative measure of HDL heterogeneity and particle profile. This metric of HDL metabolism can be assessed by both NMR and ion mobility measurements and is capable of predicting cardiovascular risk (Musunuru et al., 2009). An association between mean HDL size and cardiovascular risk is typically inverse. When HDL size is used to predict incident cardiovascular disease, hazard ratios obtained are comparable to those calculated using HDL-C (Mora et al., 2009) and can be predominantly accounted for by traditional cardiovascular risk factors (Arsenault et al., 2009). Consistent with this conclusion, adjustment for circulating concentrations of apoB and triglycerides abolished the association between mean HDL size and CAD risk in the EPIC-Norfolk study, despite reduction in this parameter in cases relative to controls (El Harchaoui et al., 2009).
Interestingly, ion mobility measurements allow distinguishing between two independent components of the association between HDL size and cardiovascular disease (Musunuru et al., 2009). The first component appears to represent an atherogenic lipoprotein phenotype, which includes increased concentrations of triglycerides and small LDL, whereas the second component is related to elevated levels of small HDL particles.
Intriguingly, very high mean HDL size can be paradoxically associated with elevated cardiovascular risk as observed in the EPIC-Norfolk study after multiple adjustment (van der Steeg et al., 2008); this association resembles those reported between cardiovascular disease and very high levels of HDL-C as observed, for example, in the IDEAL study (van der Steeg et al., 2008).
Effects of Therapeutic Interventions on HDL Particle Concentrations
Therapeutic interventions aimed at increasing HDL-C levels, correcting atherogenic dyslipidemia, and reducing cardiovascular risk may markedly impact HDL particle concentrations. Thus, both niacin (Kuvin et al., 2006; Le et al., 2013) and cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitors (Brousseau et al., 2005; Ballantyne et al., 2012; Krauss et al., 2012) potently raise HDL-C and preferentially increase circulating levels of large HDL, augmenting mean HDL size. By contrast, effects of niacin and CETP inhibitors on total number of HDL particles are weaker, consistent with their weaker effects on plasma concentrations of apoA-I.
Treatment with statins appears to result in comparable elevations in HDL-C and total HDL particle number (Rosenson et al., 2009). On the other hand, HDL-C-raising effects of fibrates are typically accompanied by preferential elevation of circulating levels of small HDL (Otvos et al., 2006).
Available data reveal that diminished HDL particle number can be superior to reduced HDL-C levels in terms of cardiovascular risk prediction. This conclusion is supported by the results of the large-scale VA-HIT, MRFIT, HPS, MESA, and JUPITER trials. Measurements of circulating concentrations of HDL particles can, therefore, be useful to improve clinical assessment of cardiovascular risk. This approach can also contribute to the evaluation of novel HDL-targeted therapies, which include CETP inhibitors, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) activators, and reconstituted HDL.
Further improvement in the evaluation of cardiovascular risk can be provided by in-depth analyses of the HDL particle profile (Mallol et al., 2015; Matyus et al., 2015). Although clinical relevance of circulating concentrations of HDL subpopulations needs to be firmly established (Rosenson et al., 2011), the negative association between the number of large HDL particles and cardiovascular risk suggests that clinical evaluation of the HDL particle profile can be useful.
Diminished mean HDL size represents another biomarker of HDL metabolism associated with cardiovascular disease in large-scale clinical studies. However, available data indicate that this relationship is secondary to those established for plasma levels of HDL particles, HDL-C and large HDL; indeed, HDL-C is primarily carried in the circulation by large, buoyant, lipid-rich HDL.
The epidemiological data thereby suggest that HDL particle number can be superior to HDL-C as a therapeutic target. This conclusion is consistent with the capacity of all HDL particles to exert a variety of atheroprotective biological activities, reflecting a wide spectrum of molecular protein, and lipid species present in HDL (Davidson et al., 2009; Heinecke, 2009; Gordon et al., 2010a,b; Camont et al., 2013; Shah et al., 2013). High compositional heterogeneity of HDL directly results in functional heterogeneity among HDL particles, with small, dense, and protein-rich HDL typically displaying potent biological activities (Kontush and Chapman, 2006a; Camont et al., 2011, 2013). The relative importance of different biological activities of HDL for atheroprotection remains presently unclear, raising a question of the proper evaluation of HDL function in vitro. Measurement of any individual HDL activity will obviously provide only limited information on all the aspects of the functionality of the circulating HDL pool. Evaluation of total number of circulating HDL particles may provide a surrogate biomarker reflecting anti-atherogenic HDL function, assuming a proportional association between the two. This hypothesis will require rigorous assessment in clinical and epidemiological studies of HDL-targeted therapies, which have failed to provide unequivocal data in this regard up to now.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Arsenault, B. J., Lemieux, I., Despres, J. P., Gagnon, P., Wareham, N. J., Stroes, E. S., et al. (2009). HDL particle size and the risk of coronary heart disease in apparently healthy men and women: the EPIC-Norfolk prospective population study. Atherosclerosis 206, 276–281. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2009.01.044
Asztalos, B. F., Batista, M., Horvath, K. V., Cox, C. E., Dallal, G. E., Morse, J. S., et al. (2003). Change in alpha1 HDL concentration predicts progression in coronary artery stenosis. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 23, 847–852. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000066133.32063.BB
Asztalos, B. F., Collins, D., Cupples, L. A., Demissie, S., Horvath, K. V., Bloomfield, H. E., et al. (2005). Value of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) subpopulations in predicting recurrent cardiovascular events in the veterans affairs HDL intervention trial. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 25, 2185–2191. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000183727.90611.4f
Asztalos, B. F., Cupples, L. A., Demissie, S., Horvath, K. V., Cox, C. E., Batista, M. C., et al. (2004). High-density lipoprotein subpopulation profile and coronary heart disease prevalence in male participants of the Framingham Offspring Study. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 24, 2181–2187. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000146325.93749.a8
Ballantyne, C. M., Miller, M., Niesor, E. J., Burgess, T., Kallend, D., and Stein, E. A. (2012). Effect of dalcetrapib plus pravastatin on lipoprotein metabolism and high-density lipoprotein composition and function in dyslipidemic patients: results of a phase IIb dose-ranging study. Am. Heart. J. 163, 515–521:e1–e3. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2011.11.017
Brousseau, M. E., Diffenderfer, M. R., Millar, J. S., Nartsupha, C., Asztalos, B. F., Welty, F. K., et al. (2005). Effects of cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibition on high-density lipoprotein subspecies. Apolipoprotein A-I metabolism, and fecal sterol excretion. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 25, 1057–1064.
Camont, L., Chapman, M. J., and Kontush, A. (2011). Biological activities of HDL subpopulations and their relevance to cardiovascular disease. Trends Mol. Med. 17, 594–603. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2011.05.013
Camont, L., Lhomme, M., Rached, F., Le Goff, W., Negre-Salvayre, A., Salvayre, R., et al. (2013). Small, dense high-density lipoprotein-3 particles are enriched in negatively charged phospholipids: relevance to cellular cholesterol eﬄux, antioxidative, antithrombotic, anti-inflammatory, and antiapoptotic functionalities. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 33, 2715–2723. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.113.301468
Davidson, W. S., Silva, R. A., Chantepie, S., Lagor, W. R., Chapman, M. J., and Kontush, A. (2009). Proteomic analysis of defined HDL subpopulations reveals particle-specific protein clusters: relevance to antioxidative function. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 29, 870–876. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.109.186031
El Harchaoui, K., Arsenault, B. J., Franssen, R., Despres, J. P., Hovingh, G. K., Stroes, E. S., et al. (2009). High-density lipoprotein particle size and concentration and coronary risk. Ann. Intern. Med. 150, 84–93. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-2-200901200-00006
Festa, A., Williams, K., Hanley, A. J. G., Otvos, J. D., Goff, D. C., Wagenknecht, L. E., et al. (2005). Nuclear magnetic resonance lipoprotein abnormalities in prediabetic subjects in the insulin resistance atherosclerosis study. Circulation 111, 3465–3472. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.512079
Garvey, W. T., Kwon, S., Zheng, D., Shaughnessy, S., Wallace, P., Hutto, A., et al. (2003). Effects of insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes on lipoprotein subclass particle size and concentration determined by nuclear magnetic resonance. Diabetes Metab. Res. Rev. 52, 453–462.
Goff, D. C. Jr., D’Agostino, R. B. Jr., Haffner, S. M., and Otvos, J. D. (2005). Insulin resistance and adiposity influence lipoprotein size and subclass concentrations. Results from the insulin resistance atherosclerosis study. Metabolism 54, 264–270.
Gordon, S., Durairaj, A., Lu, J. L., and Davidson, W. S. (2010a). High-density lipoprotein proteomics: identifying new drug targets and biomarkers by understanding functionality. Curr. Cardiovasc. Risk Rep. 4, 1–8. doi: 10.1007/s12170-009-0069-9
Gordon, S. M., Deng, J., Lu, L. J., and Davidson, W. S. (2010b). Proteomic characterization of human plasma high density lipoprotein fractionated by gel filtration chromatography. J. Proteome Res. 9, 5239–5249. doi: 10.1021/pr100520x
Kathiresan, S., Otvos, J. D., Sullivan, L. M., Keyes, M. J., Schaefer, E. J., Wilson, P. W., et al. (2006). Increased small low-density lipoprotein particle number: a prominent feature of the metabolic syndrome in the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 113, 20–29. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.567107
Kontush, A., and Chapman, M. J. (2006b). Functionally defective HDL: a new therapeutic target at the crossroads of dyslipidemia, inflammation and atherosclerosis. Pharmacol. Rev. 3, 342–374. doi: 10.1124/pr.58.3.1
Krauss, R. M., Wojnooski, K., Orr, J., Geaney, J. C., Pinto, C. A., Liu, Y., et al. (2012). Changes in lipoprotein subfraction concentration and composition in healthy individuals treated with the CETP inhibitor anacetrapib. J. Lipid Res. 53, 540–547. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M018010
Kuller, L., Arnold, A., Tracy, R., Otvos, J., Burke, G., Psaty, B., et al. (2002). Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy of lipoproteins and risk of coronary heart disease in the Cardiovascular Health Study. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 22, 1175–1180. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000022015.97341.3A
Kuller, L. H., Grandits, G., Cohen, J. D., Neaton, J. D., Prineas, R., and Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial Research Group (2007). Lipoprotein particles, insulin, adiponectin, C-reactive protein and risk of coronary heart disease among men with metabolic syndrome. Atherosclerosis 195, 122–128.
Kuvin, J. T., Dave, D. M., Sliney, K. A., Mooney, P., Patel, A. R., Kimmelstiel, C. D., et al. (2006). Effects of extended-release niacin on lipoprotein particle size, distribution, and inflammatory markers in patients with coronary artery disease. Am. J. Cardiol. 98, 743–745. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.04.011
Lamon-Fava, S., Herrington, D. M., Reboussin, D. M., Sherman, M., Horvath, K. V., Cupples, L. A., et al. (2008). Plasma levels of HDL subpopulations and remnant lipoproteins predict the extent of angiographically-defined coronary artery disease in postmenopausal women. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 28, 575–579. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.107.157123
Le, N. A., Jin, R., Tomassini, J. E., Tershakovec, A. M., Neff, D. R., and Wilson, P. W. (2013). Changes in lipoprotein particle number with ezetimibe/simvastatin coadministered with extended-release niacin in hyperlipidemic patients. J. Am. Heart. Assoc. 2:e000037. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.113.000037
Mackey, R. H., Greenland, P., Goff, D. C. Jr., Lloyd-Jones, D., Sibley, C. T., and Mora, S. (2012). High-density lipoprotein cholesterol and particle concentrations, carotid atherosclerosis, and coronary events: MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis). J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 60, 508–516. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.03.060
Mallol, R., Amigo, N., Rodriguez, M. A., Heras, M., Vinaixa, M., Plana, N., et al. (2015). Liposcale: a novel advanced lipoprotein test based on 2D diffusion-ordered 1H NMR spectroscopy. J. Lipid Res. 56, 737–746. doi: 10.1194/jlr.D050120
Matyus, S. P., Braun, P. J., Wolak-Dinsmore, J., Saenger, A. K., Jeyarajah, E. J., Shalaurova, I., et al. (2015). HDL particle number measured on the Vantera(R), the first clinical NMR analyzer. Clin. Biochem. 48, 148–155. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2014.11.017
Mora, S., Glynn, R. J., and Ridker, P. M. (2013). High-density lipoprotein cholesterol, size, particle number, and residual vascular risk after potent statin therapy. Circulation 128, 1189–1197. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.002671
Mora, S., Otvos, J. D., Rifai, N., Rosenson, R. S., Buring, J. E., and Ridker, P. M. (2009). Lipoprotein particle profiles by nuclear magnetic resonance compared with standard lipids and apolipoproteins in predicting incident cardiovascular disease in women. Circulation 119, 931–939. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.816181
Mora, S., Szklo, M., Otvos, J. D., Greenland, P., Psaty, B. M., Goff, D. C., et al. (2007). LDL particle subclasses. LDL particle size, and carotid atherosclerosis in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). Atherosclerosis 192, 211–217.
Musunuru, K., Orho-Melander, M., Caulfield, M. P., Li, S., Salameh, W. A., Reitz, R. E., et al. (2009). Ion mobility analysis of lipoprotein subfractions identifies three independent axes of cardiovascular risk. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 29, 1975–1980. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.109.190405
Otvos, J. D., Collins, D., Freedman, D. S., Shalaurova, I., Schaefer, E. J., Mcnamara, J. R., et al. (2006). Low-density lipoprotein and high-density lipoprotein particle subclasses predict coronary events and are favorably changed by gemfibrozil therapy in the Veterans Affairs High-Density Lipoprotein Intervention Trial. Circulation 113, 1556–1563. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.565135
Parish, S., Offer, A., Clarke, R., Hopewell, J. C., Hill, M. R., Otvos, J. D., et al. (2012). Lipids and lipoproteins and risk of different vascular events in the MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study. Circulation 125, 2469–2478. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.073684
Riwanto, M., and Landmesser, U. (2013). High density lipoproteins and endothelial functions: mechanistic insights and alterations in cardiovascular disease. J. Lipid Res. 54, 3227–3243. doi: 10.1194/jlr.R037762
Rosenson, R. S., Brewer, H. B. Jr., Chapman, M. J., Fazio, S., Hussain, M. M., Kontush, A., et al. (2011). HDL Measures, Particle Heterogeneity, Proposed Nomenclature, and Relation to Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Events. Clin. Chem. 57, 392–410. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2010.155333
Rosenson, R. S., Otvos, J. D., and Freedman, D. S. (2002). Relations of lipoprotein subclass levels and low-density lipoprotein size to progression of coronary artery disease in the Pravastatin Limitation of Atherosclerosis in the Coronary Arteries (PLAC-I) trial. Am. J. Cardiol. 90, 89–94. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9149(02)02427-X
Rosenson, R. S., Otvos, J. D., and Hsia, J. (2009). Effects of rosuvastatin and atorvastatin on LDL and HDL particle concentrations in patients with metabolic syndrome: a randomized, double-blind, controlled study. Diabetes Care 32, 1087–1091. doi: 10.2337/dc08-1681
Schaefer, E. J., and Asztalos, B. F. (2007a). Increasing high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, inhibition of cholesteryl ester transfer protein, and heart disease risk reduction. Am. J. Cardiol. 100, S25–S31. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.08.010
Schaefer, E. J., and Asztalos, B. F. (2007b). Where are we with high-density lipoprotein raising and inhibition of cholesteryl ester transfer for heart disease risk reduction? Curr. Opin. Cardiol. 22, 373–378. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0b013e3281fbd3c7
Shah, A. S., Tan, L., Long, J. L., and Davidson, W. S. (2013). Proteomic diversity of high density lipoproteins: our emerging understanding of its importance in lipid transport and beyond. J. Lipid Res. 54, 2575–2585. doi: 10.1194/jlr.R035725
van der Steeg, W. A., Holme, I., Boekholdt, S. M., Larsen, M. L., Lindahl, C., Stroes, E. S., et al. (2008). High-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein particle size, and apolipoprotein A-I: significance for cardiovascular risk: the IDEAL and EPIC-Norfolk studies. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 51, 634–642. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.09.060
Keywords: high-density lipoprotein, particle number, HDL cholesterol, plasma concentrations, circulating levels, large HDL, cardiovascular risk, cardiovascular disease, atherosclerosis
Citation: Kontush A (2015) HDL particle number and size as predictors of cardiovascular disease. Front. Pharmacol. 6:218. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2015.00218
Received: 06 July 2015; Accepted: 16 September 2015;
Published: 05 October 2015.
Edited by:Norman Eric Miller, University of Oxford, UK
Reviewed by:Christoph Sinning, University Heart Center Hamburg, Germany
Ghanshyam Upadhyay, City College of New York, USA
Copyright © 2015 Kontush. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Anatol Kontush, National Institute for Health and Medical Research (INSERM), UMR-ICAN 1166, Pitié-Salpétrière University Hospital, University of Pierre and Marie Curie -Paris 6, Pavillon Benjamin Delessert, Hôpital de la Pitié, 83 boulevard de l’Hôpital, 75651 Paris Cedex 13, France, firstname.lastname@example.org