Mechanisms of the Testis Toxicity Induced by Chronic Exposure to Mequindox

Abstract

Mequindox (MEQ) is a synthetic antimicrobial agent widely used in China since the 1980s. Although the toxicity of MEQ is well recognized, its testis toxicity has not been adequately investigated. In the present study, we provide evidence that MEQ triggers oxidative stress, mitochondrion dysfunction and spermatogenesis deficiency in mice after exposure to MEQ (0, 25, 55, and 110 mg/kg in the diet) for up to 18 months. The genotoxicity and adrenal toxicity may contribute to sperm abnormalities caused by MEQ. Moreover, using LC/MS-IT-TOF analysis, two metabolites, 3-methyl-2-(1-hydroxyethyl) quinoxaline-N4-monoxide (M4) and 3-methyl-2-(1-hydroxyethyl) quinoxaline-N1-monoxide (M8), were detected in the serum of mice, which directly confirms the relationship between the N→O group reduction metabolism of MEQ and oxidative stress. Interestingly, only M4 was detected in the testes, suggesting that the higher reproductive toxicity of M4 than M8 might be due to the increased stability of M4-radical (M4-R) compared to M8-radical (M8-R). Furthermore, the expression of the blood-testis barrier (BTB)-associated junctions such as tight junctions, gap junctions and basal ectoplasmic specializations were also examined. The present study demonstrated for the first time the role of the M4 in testis toxicity, and illustrated that the oxidative stress, mitochondrion dysfunction and interference in spermatogenesis, as well as the altered expression of BTB related junctions, were involved in the reproductive toxicity mediated by MEQ in vivo.

Introduction

Mequindox (3-methyl-2-acetyl-N-1,4-dioxyquinoxaline, C₁₁H₁₀N₂O₃; MEQ) (Figure 1) is structurally similar to QdNOs, a group of chemicals consisting of one or two acyclic chain moieties combined with a quinoxaline ring. QdNOs are synthetic agents with a wide range of biological properties including antibacterial, anti-candida, anti-tubercular, anti-cancer, anti-protozoal and growth-promoting activities (Wu et al., 2007; Vicente et al., 2009; Wang et al., 2011a, 2015, 2016d; Cheng et al., 2015; Liu Q. et al., 2016). Four QdNO derivatives, CBX, OLA, QCT and cyadox (CYA), have been developed for use in livestock and poultry farming, contributing to their significant antibacterial abilities and growth-promotion properties (Wang et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2015). However, CBX and OLA have been banned in food-producing animals by European Commission since 1998 because of their potential genotoxic and carcinogenic toxicity (Wang et al., 2016d). MEQ is a relatively new synthetic antibacterial agent that was widely applied in China in pigs and chickens owing to its strong inhibitory effect against both gram-positive and -negative bacteria (Ihsan et al., 2010, 2011, 2013; Huang et al., 2015).

FIGURE 1

A large amount of evidence has suggested that the N→O group reduction is a major concerned metabolic pathway of QdNOs (Cheng et al., 2015, 2016; Liu Q. et al., 2016); accompanying this, some ROS and radical intermediates have emerged that ultimately cause oxidative stress (Liu et al., 2017). It was revealed that oxidative stress plays a critical role in the damage caused by QdNOs such as apoptosis, DNA and lipid damage in vitro and in vivo (Chowdhury et al., 2004; Azqueta et al., 2007; Yang et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2015; Liu et al., 2017). The genotoxicity induced by QCT, OLA and MEQ was found to be closely related to oxidative stress (Zou et al., 2009; Huang et al., 2010; Liu W.Y. et al., 2012; Dai et al., 2015; Yang et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2016d). In a recent study to investigate the mechanism of genotoxicity induced by QCT, the production of ROS during the metabolism of QCT by xanthine oxidoreductase (XOR) was considered a main factor in DNA strand breakage (Wang et al., 2016d). Thus, it was suspected that oxidative stress may be involved in the reproductive toxicity in mice after chronic exposure to MEQ.

Importantly, apart from oxidative stress, the N→O group reduction metabolites of QdNOs were also found to be associated with their toxicity (Hao et al., 2006; Chen et al., 2008, 2009; Zhang et al., 2012, 2015; Wang et al., 2015; Liu Q. et al., 2016; Liu et al., 2017). The primary metabolites of MEQ, N1-MEQ and bidesoxy-mequindox, exhibited genotoxicity in in vitro and in vivo short-term tests (Liu Q. et al., 2016). We recently showed that 2-isoethanol 1-desoxymequindox (M4) and 2-isoethanol 4-desoxymequindox (M8) (Figure 1) were involved in liver toxicity in mice after exposure to MEQ for 11 months (Liu et al., 2017). It was revealed that oxidative stress and metabolites of MEQ were regarded as important toxicity mechanisms in in vivo models of the adrenal gland (Huang et al., 2009), liver (Wang et al., 2011b; Liu et al., 2017), spleen (Wang et al., 2011b), and endocrine and reproductive system (Ihsan et al., 2011). The in vitro adrenal toxicity study on H295R cells that originated from a human adrenocortical carcinoma has further confirmed this conclusion (Wang et al., 2016c). Therefore, the metabolites and oxidative stress were thought to participate in reproductive toxicity caused by MEQ. However, to date, the mechanism underlying the correlations of these two factors in the reproductive toxicity induced by MEQ in vivo still remains unclear.

A previous in vitro study reported that MEQ could be metabolized into 10 metabolites after incubation with liver microsomes of pigs, chickens, and rats (Liu Z.Y. et al., 2010). Among these metabolites, M4 was identified as a common and major metabolite of MEQ in vivo by quantitative analysis using isotopic tracing (Huang et al., 2015). A total of five metabolites without intact MEQ had been identified in chicken plasma samples by high performance liquid chromatography combined with ion trap-time of flight-mass spectrometry (Liu Y.C. et al., 2010). Additionally, MEQ and its six metabolites were detected in plasma samples of rats after a single i.v. and p.o. administration of MEQ at the dose of 10 mg/kg b.w. (Li et al., 2012). Recently, in a study to investigate the metabolism, distribution, and elimination of MEQ in vivo, intact MEQ was present in both urine and feces in rats, in urine at a comparable low level in pigs, and no intact MEQ was observed in the excreta and tissues in chickens (Huang et al., 2015). MEQ was metabolized extensively in animals with a generation of 13 metabolites and most of the metabolites were found consistently in pigs, rats, and chickens, demonstrating that the main metabolism route are similar in different species (Huang et al., 2015). Regarding the reproductive toxicity induced by MEQ, only one study has been conducted and demonstrated that the chronic exposure of MEQ triggered reproductive toxicity in male rats (Ihsan et al., 2011), suggesting a certain risk of chronic MEQ exposure on the fertility of animals and human. MEQ is widely used in animal production in China for many years (Liu J. et al., 2012; Wu et al., 2012; Li et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2016b), however, its reproductive toxicity has not been adequately investigated. To our knowledge, a previous study revealed that 2-isoethanol 4-desoxymequindox (M11), a metabolite of MEQ, was detected in the testis of wistar rats (Ihsan et al., 2011), suggesting that MEQ may disrupt the BTB in the testes in vivo. Therefore, the objective of this study was to clarify the reproductive toxicity of MEQ in vivo, and to further elucidate the role of BTB-associated junctions and the potential toxic metabolites of MEQ in the testis of male mice, which will improve the prudent use of MEQ for public health.

Based on the above information, we hypothesized that the MEQ may induce reproductive toxicity in male mice. The metabolites of MEQ and oxidative stress involved in the metabolism of MEQ may disrupt the BTB in testes of mice. In the present study, we comprehensively evaluated the reproductive toxicity in Kunming mouse after exposure to MEQ for 18 months. To verify the above hypothesis, we investigated (1) the effect of MEQ on body and testis weight, and histological structures in testes, (2) the effect of MEQ on ultrastructural changes in testes by TEM observations, (3) the activity of MDA and 8-OHdG in serum, (4) the identification of metabolites of MEQ in the serum and testis by LC/MS-IT-TOF analysis, and (5) whether MEQ changed the mRNA expression of BTB-associated genes including basal ESs (N-cadherin, α-catenin and β-catenin), GJs (Connexin-43), and TJs (CAR, F11R, Occludin and ZO-1) in the testes of mice.

Materials and Methods

Chemical Reagents

Mequindox (C₁₁H₁₀N₂O₃, molecular weight 218.21 g/mol, CAS No: 60875-16-3, purity 98%) was obtained from Beijing Zhongnongfa Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (Huanggang, China). Bouins’ solution, glutaraldehyde, cacodylate, acetonitrile, formic acid, trichloroacetic acid and dichloromethane were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, United States).

Test Animals

Forty specified pathogen-free (SPF) Kunming male mice (6- to 7-weeks-old, 30 ± 5 g) were purchased from the Center of Laboratory Animals of Hubei Province (Wuhan, China). The individual body weight (BW) of each mouse was within ±20% of the average. The mice were maintained in a room conditioned at 22 ± 3°C, a relative humidity of 50% ± 20%, and a 12 h light/dark cycle. The mice were housed five per group per sex in shoebox cages with hardwood shavings as bedding. The shoebox consisted of polypropylene PP plastics, and the box lid is stainless steel with many fences. The box size is 290 mm × 180 mm × 160 mm. Food and tap water were supplied ad libitum. The diet were purchased from the Center of Laboratory Animals of Hubei Province (Wuhan, China). Prior to use, the tap water and bedding material were autoclaved by high temperature sterilizing oven, and the diet was sterilized by ultraviolet light. All animal work was in compliance with the NIH Publication “The Development of Science Based Guidelines for Laboratory Animal Care” (NRC, 2004). The experimental procedures involving mice were performed in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of China (permit SYXK 20070044). In the present study, the mice were handled in accordance with the protocols approved by the Ethical Committee of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine (Huazhong Agricultural University).

Experimental Design

According to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) Guideline 453 and Procedures for toxicological assessment of food in China, the high-dose level should cause some toxic effect performance or damage, and the low-dose group may not show any toxic effects, but should be 1–3 times greater than the clinical dose (GB15193.17, 2003; OECD, 2009). In a previous sub-chronic and chronic toxicity study, MEQ in 110 mg/kg diet made an increase in plasma potassium (K⁺) level without growth inhibition, and this dose was determined to be no-observed-adverse-effect level (Ihsan, 2011). Therefore, the 110 mg/kg diet was selected as the high dose, and 55 mg/kg for the middle and 25 mg/kg for the low dose, respectively.

Prior to the initiation of dosing, mice were evaluated for any signs of disease and weight gain by being quarantined for 1 week. After acclimatization for 1 week, the male Kunming mice were randomly divided into four groups (n = 10), including a control group and three MEQ treated groups. The control group received the basic diet without feed additives. Three MEQ treated groups were administered the same diet supplemented with 25, 55, and 110 mg/kg MEQ, respectively. The treatment period lasted for 18 months. Symptoms and/or mortality were observed and carefully recorded each day during the 18 month period.

Preparation of Testes

Following 18 months of MEQ administration, the mice were weighed and sacrificed after being anesthetized. After weighing the body and testes, the relative of testis weight was calculated as the ratio of testes (wet weight, mg) to BW (g). The testes were excised, rinsed in phosphate buffered saline (PBS), and quickly frozen at -70°C.

Histopathological Examination

The histopathological tests were performed using standard laboratory procedures. The right testis from the males (n = 5) were immediately fixed in Bouins’ solution for 24 h. After fixation, the testes were rinsed by running water and embedded in paraffin blocks, then sliced into 5 μm thick sections and placed onto glass slides with hematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining. Finally, the morphological alterations of testes were observed under an optical microscope (Olympus BX 41, Japan).

Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM) Observation

The right testis from other males (n = 5) fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 mol/dm³ cacodylate buffer for 4 h, then followed by washing three times with 0.1 mol dm cacodylate buffer (pH 7.2–7.4) and being placed in 1% osmium tetraoxide for 1 h. A graded series of ethanol (75, 85, 95, and 100%) was used to dehydrate the specimens and they were then embedded in Epon 812. Ultra-thin sections (70 nm) were contrasted with lead citrate for 10 min and uranyl acetate for 30 min, before being observed with an H-7650 TEM (Hitachi, Japan).

Oxidative Stress Assay

Malondialdehyde and 8-OHdG kits were obtained from Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute (Nanjing, China). The effects of MEQ on the activity of 8-OHdG and MDA in the serum of male mice were examined. An assay of MDA level was performed using a commercial kit. 8-OHdG was assayed using commercial ELISA kits. The data were analyzed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The protein concentration in testes was determined using the BCA protein assay kit as standard.

LC/MS-IT-TOF Analysis of MEQ and Its Metabolites in Serum and Testis

The MEQ and its metabolites in the serum and testes were detected by the hybrid IT/TOF mass spectrometry coupled with a high-performance liquid chromatography system (Shimadzu Corp., Kyoto, Japan). The liquid chromatography system (Shimadzu) was connected with a DGU-20A3 degasser, a photodiode array detector (SPD-M20A), a solvent delivery pump (LC-20AD), an autosampler (SIL-20AC), a communication base module (CBM-20A) and a column oven (CTO-20AC).

Selection of Pretreatment Methods of Samples

In this study, the pretreatment methods of serum and testis were according to the previous studies (Liu Z.Y. et al., 2010; Ihsan et al., 2011). In preliminary experiment, a total of 1.0 ppm MEQ standard was added into 200 μL of the serum and 0.1 g of the testis from the control group, respectively. After pretreatment using the same methods as described detailedly below, the mixture (200 μL) of serum and testis were prepared for LC/MS-IT-TOF analysis, respectively.

LC/MS-IT-TOF Analysis of MEQ and Its Metabolites in Serum

Here, 200 μL of the serum sample was mixed with 600 μL extraction reagent of acetonitrile and vortex-mixed for 5 min. Then, the solution was centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 15 min in a model omni mixer homogenizer 17106 (OMNI International, Waterbury, CT, United States) to collect the supernatant. The residual sediment was applied to extract MEQ and its metabolites again following the above steps. The supernatant from the two extractions was merged and dried using N₂ at 40°C water baths. After drying, the residue was dissolved with 200 μL solution of LC-MS/MS mobile phase [acetonitrile: 0.1% formic acid (1:9, v/v)] to prepare for LC/MS-IT-TOF analysis.

LC/MS-IT-TOF Analysis of MEQ and Its Metabolites in Testis

Next, 0.1 g of the testis sample from the left testis from all males (n = 10) was homogenized with 4.5 mL of 40°C distilled water at the speed of 10,000 × g for 3 min in a model omni mixer homogenizer 17106 (OMNI International, Waterbury, CT, United States). Then 0.5 mL trichloroacetic acid was added. After vigorous shaking, the homogenate was centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 15 min to collect the supernatant. The mixed reagent [dichloromethane: acetonitrile (2:1, v/v)] was used to extract MEQ and its metabolites twice. Then, 3.0 mL mixed reagent was added to the supernatant and vortex-mixed for 5 min. After vigorous shaking, the solution was centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 15 min to obtain the lower liquid. Then, the lower liquid from the two extractions was merged and dried using N₂ in a 40°C water bath. The residue was reconstituted in 5 mL 5% methanol. The reconstitution fluid was applied to the methanol (3.0 mL) and water (3.0 mL) pre-washed HLB 3cc cartridge (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, United States). The reconstitution fluid was then sequentially washed with 3.0 mL 5% methanol in water and 5 mL methanol. The extracts of testis were eluted into plastic tubes and evaporated to dryness under N₂ at 40°C water baths. After drying, the residue was dissolved with 500 μL solution of LC-MS/MS mobile phase [acetonitrile: 0.1% formic acid (1:9, v/v)] and passed through a 0.22 μm filter membrane. The mixture (200 μL) was prepared for LC/MS-IT-TOF analysis.

Chromatographic Conditions

Separation of MEQ and its metabolites in the serum and testis was performed on a VPODS column (150 mm × 2.0 mm; particle size, 5 μm) using a gradient elution consisting of mobile phase A (0.1% formic acid in water) and mobile phase B (acetonitrile). The sample chamber in the autosampler was maintained at 4°C, whereas the column was set at 40°C. The gradient of the chromatographic condition was as follows: 0–5 min, linear gradient from 10 to 15% B; 5–15 min, linear gradient to 70% B; 15–18 min, linear gradient to 100% B; 18–23 min, 100% B; and 23–23.1 min, linear gradient back to 10% B. The entire analysis was completed in 30 min. PDA detection was performed from 200 to 400 nm. The 20 μL was applied as injection volume, and the flow rate was 0.2 mL/min. In the present study, M4 and M8 standards were not used.

The mass spectrometer was equipped with an electrospray ionization (ESI) source and operated in the positive mode. Mass spectrometric analyses were carried out by full-scan MS with a mass range of 10–500 Da and data-dependent MS/MS acquisition on the suspected metabolites ions. Liquid nitrogen was used as the nebulizing gas at a flow rate of 1.5 L/min. The capillary and skimmer voltages were set at 4.5 and 1.6 kV, respectively. The temperature of CDL and heat block remained at 200°C. The MS² spectra were produced using collision-induced dissociation (CID) of the selected precursor ions using argon as collision gas with relative energy of 50%. The precursor ion isolation width at 1 Da and the ion accumulation time were set at 50 ms.

Data Acquisition and Processing

Prior to data acquisition, the external mass calibration was carried out using direct infusion of a reference standard from 50 to 1000 Da. The reference standard contained 0.1 g/L sodium hydrate and 0.25 mL/L trifluoroacetic acid. 5 μL/min was set as the flow rate of the infusion pump. After mass calibration with the reference standard, all calculated mass error was less than 5 ppm. The LC/MS solution version 3.41 software supplied with the instrument was used to data acquisition and processing. Any mass numbers corresponding to particular elemental composition were also calculated by the formula predictor, and would generate more than one formula proposed by the software. In the present study, an accuracy error threshold of ±20 ppm was set as a limit to the calculation of possible elemental compositions. The identification of MEQ and its metabolites were also based on the recent reports (Huang et al., 2015; Liu et al., 2017).

Quantitative Real-Time PCR

The mRNA expression of genes related to BTB (e.g., N-cadherin, α-catenin, β-catenin, Connexin-43, CAR, F11R, Occludin and ZO-1) in mouse testes was measured. The levels of mRNA expression of the genes were determined by real-time quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Total RNA from the left testis from all males (n = 10) was extracted using the Trizol Reagent according to the manufacturer’s instructions. One microgram of RNA was reverse-transcribed to cDNA with the use of ReverTra Ace^TM First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Promega, United States). Synthesized cDNA was used for RT-PCR (Bio-Rad, United States) with the SYBR^® Premix Ex Taq^TM RT-PCR kit (Takara, CodeDRR041 A, Japan).

The Primer Express Software was applied to design the mice specific primers according to the software guidelines (Table 1). Each 25 μL reaction mixture consisted of 12.5 μL SYBR^® Premix Ex Taq^TM, 1.0 μL of each primer (10 μm), 2.0 μL of cDNA, and 8.5 μL RNase-Free H₂O. For N-cadherin, α-catenin and β-catenin, the cycling conditions were as follows: step 1, 30 s at 95°C; step 2, 45 cycles at 95°C for 5 s, and 61°C for 30 s; and step 3, dissociation stage. For Connexin-43, F11R, Occludin and ZO-1, the cycling conditions were as follows: step 1, 30 s at 95°C; step 2, 45 cycles at 95°C for 5 s, and 60°C for 30 s; and step 3, dissociation stage. For CAR, the cycling conditions were as follows: step 1, 30 s at 95°C; step 2, 45 cycles at 95°C for 5 s, and 55°C for 30 s; and step 3, dissociation stage. In this study, the housekeeping gene β-actin was used as an internal calibrator reference gene for the expression profiling of genes.

Following amplification, a melt curve analysis with the complementary computer software was applied to determine the authenticity of the amplified product described as its specific melting temperature (Tm). The threshold cycle of genes and the difference between their Ct values (ΔCt) were counted. Relative quantitative analyses of gene expression were performed using 2^-ΔΔCt data analysis method in accordance with previous reports (Huang et al., 2009; Wang et al., 2011b, 2016c).

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 13.0 for Windows. All results are expressed as means ± SD. Group differences were assessed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the least significance difference (LSD) test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Body Weight, Absolute Testes Weight and Relative Testis Weight

The final BW, absolute testis weight and relative testis weight of male mice after the administration of MEQ for 18 months are shown in Figure 2. The relative testis weight was expressed as milligrams (wet weight of testes mg)/(grams BW, g). Compared with the control group, the body and testis weights as well as relative testis weight were decreased in the MEQ treated groups. A significant reduction in absolute testis weight and relative testis weight were noted in the 110 mg/kg group (p < 0.05), and a significant decrease in BW was observed in the 25 mg/kg MEQ group (p < 0.01).

FIGURE 2

Histological Evaluation

As shown in Figure 3, significant histopathological changes in testes were observed in half of the male mice of all the MEQ-treated groups. In the control testes, normal testicular interstitial and seminiferous tubules contained a larger number of developing sperm cells in the stratified epithelium and in the lumen of tubules (Figure 3A). The Sertoli cells and spermatogenic cells were arranged in an orderly manner in the seminiferous tubules (Figure 3A). Compared with the control group, with broadened interstitial testicular tissue, a few vacuoles in seminiferous tubules, and the irregular arrangement and decreased number as well as the reduced layers of sperm spermatogenic cells in lumen were found in mice treated with 25 mg/kg (Figure 3B). The most obvious damage to testicular structure was found in the 55 and 110 mg/kg groups. The spermatogonia and spermatocytes in the lumen showed necrosis, while the residual spermatocytes entered the central lumen. The sperm in the lumen disappeared in most seminiferous tubules (Figure 3C). Serious pathological changes in seminiferous tubule cells included the disorganization of germinal epithelium, atrophy of the seminiferous tubule, and completely absent spermatogenic cells with the left red stained filamentous protein (Figure 3D). The significant reduction in the number of sperm and the enlarged of testicular interstitial indicated the destruction of BTB in testes after chronic exposure to MEQ.

FIGURE 3

Ultrastructural Alterations

The ultrastructural changes of the mitochondria, sperm morphology and BTB in the testes of male mice after the administration of 25, 55, and 110 mg/kg MEQ for 18 months were studied by TEM. The mitochondria exhibited swelling, vacuoles, loss of crests, and damaged membrane structure in the 110 mg/kg group (Figure 4B). Sperm in mice testes from the control group exhibited integral membranes and normal sizes (Figure 4a). In the 110 mg/kg group, the sperm showed an obvious abnormal morphological structure with dissolving membranes. Additionally, as shown in Figure 5, there were no visible BTB-associated junctions in the 110 mg/kg group (Figure 5B). This finding indicated that the mitochondrial damage, sperm abnormity and destroyed integrity of BTB were involved in the reproductive toxicity mediated by MEQ.

FIGURE 4

FIGURE 5

Oxidative Stress Indices

The effect of MEQ on the levels of 8-OHdG and MDA in serum of male mice was shown in Figure 6. Compared with the control group, significant increased levels of MDA in the serum were markedly elevated at all MEQ treated groups (p < 0.01). The remarkable induced levels of 8-OHdG were noted at 25 and 55 mg/kg groups (p < 0.05), and 110 mg/kg group (p < 0.01). These results show that the oxidative stress was triggered in male mice after chronic administration of MEQ.

FIGURE 6

MEQ and Its Metabolites in Serum and Testes

To verify the hypothesis that MEQ may pass through the BTB into the testes to cause reproductive toxicity, we identified MEQ and its metabolites in serum and testis by LC/MS-IT-TOF analysis according to the retention times and fragment ions. As showed in Supplementary Figure S1, the accurate extracted mass chromatograms (EICs) of MEQ standard was similar to those in control samples (serum and testis) that were added to MEQ standard, indicating that the pretreatment methods of serum and testis can’t affected the structure of MEQ, which was consistent with the previous studies (Liu Z.Y. et al., 2010; Ihsan et al., 2011).

The predicated elemental composition, measured masses, exact masses, and mass errors were indicated in Table 2. The mass errors between measured and predicated masses of M4 and M8 were 3.4 and 4.9 ppm, respectively, which agree to within less than 6 ppm, providing support for the proposed elemental composition of the metabolites. The retention times and fragment ions information used in the identification of M4 and M8 were summarized in Table 3. Metabolites of M4 and M8 showed [M+H]⁺ ions at m/z 205, and had retention times of 4.5 and 7.7 min, respectively. As shown in Figures 7, 8, MEQ showed protonated molecular ion at m/z 219. This result demonstrated a loss of 14 Da (m/z 219-205) of M4 and M8 from MEQ, suggesting that M4 and M8 were N→O group reduction (loss of 16 Da) and side chain hydrogenation (acquisition 2 Da) of MEQ. The difference between M4 and M8 lay in the position of N→O group reduction in MEQ.

FIGURE 7

FIGURE 8

The accurate MS² spectral for M4 and M8, and proposed fragmentation pathways of M4 and M8 were presented in Figure 9. M4 lost HO^• radical (observed 17.0032 Da, predicated 17.0028) to form m/z 188 following loss of C₂H₂O (observed 42.0022 Da, predicated 42.0013) to form m/z 146 (Figure 9C). M8 lost HO^• radical (observed 17.0032 Da, predicated 17.0028) to form m/z 188 (Figure 9D). The fragment ions at m/z 170 was formed by the loss of H₂O (observed 18.0022 Da, predicated 18.0013) from m/z 188 (Figure 9D). The fragments and retention times of M4 and M8 detected in our study were consistent with those identified in the pigs and chickens after administration of [³H]-MEQ by oral gavage (Huang et al., 2015). Therefore, M4 and M8 were confirmed as M4, and M8, respectively.

FIGURE 9

The results showed that no MEQ was found in the serum and testis. Two metabolites (M4 and M8) were detected in the serum in MEQ exposure groups (Figure 7), while only one metabolite (M4) was found in the testis after the administration of MEQ for 18 months (Figure 8). These results indicated that M4 may be the toxic metabolite in the testes of mice that could pass through BTB to induce sperm aberration and reproductive toxicity.

The Expressions of BTB Related Genes

To confirm whether BTB is involved in MEQ-induced male reproductive toxicity in male mice, the mRNA expression of some BTB related genes (e.g., N-cadherin, α-catenin, β-catenin, Connexin-43, CAR, F11R, Occludin and ZO-1) were evaluated using RT-PCR (Figure 10). Exposure to MEQ significantly reduced the expression of N-cadherin and α-catenin in all of the treated groups (p < 0.01). Decreased mRNA expression of CAR, ZO-1 and β-catenin was observed in 25, 55, and 110 group, accordingly (p < 0.01). There was a marked increased level of Connexin-43 and F11R expression in both 25 and 55 mg/kg MEQ groups (p < 0.05 or p < 0.01). A significant increase in the expression level of Occludin was noted in the 55 mg/kg group (p < 0.05). These results support the findings of ultrastructural alterations at the highest dose level and indicate potential effects also on the structure and integrity of BTB at lower doses.

FIGURE 10

Discussion

Previous studies have illustrated that oxidative stress and metabolites are associated with the in vitro toxicity in H295R cells (Wang et al., 2016c), and in vivo toxicity in rats (Huang et al., 2009; Ihsan et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2011b) and mice (Liu et al., 2017). However, relatively little is known about the role of these two factors in the reproductive toxicity induced by MEQ in vivo. Although it has been documented that MEQ exposure induced male reproductive toxicity (Ihsan et al., 2011), it still remains unclear whether the testis is the primary cellular target for MEQ mediated-male reproductive toxicity. In the present study, the results demonstrated that the metabolites of MEQ, oxidative stress, mitochondrion dysfunction and spermatogenesis deficiency are involved in the reproductive toxicity in mice after the chronic administration of MEQ for up to 18 months. Additionally, it was suggested that M4, with higher reproductive toxicity than M8, might pass through the BTB to cause direct damage to the testes. Moreover, the adverse effect of toxic metabolites of MEQ on the testis was first noted, and the disrupted BTB further resulted in the invasion of M4 into the testes to invoke the subsequent abnormal spermatogenesis.

It has been documented that MEQ exposure induced reproductive toxicity in rats. Ihsan et al. (2011) reported that a significant reduction in the final body and testicular weight and a significant increase in the relative testicular weight were observed on Wistar rats. MEQ was found to change sperm morphology, decrease fertility, and alter the growth and development of the next generation (Ihsan, 2011). In the present study, a reduction in BW, absolute testis weight, and the relative testis weight were observed when male mice were administered MEQ at doses of 25, 55, and 110 mg/kg for an extended period of time (Figure 2). Herein, a reduction in BW suggested that even low dose of MEQ showed its toxicity after long exposure to mice. The histopathological evaluation of MEQ-treated mice showed marked testis damage, including broadened interstitial testicular tissue, a few vacuoles in the seminiferous tubules, and the necrosis of both spermatogonia and spermatocytes in the lumen (Figure 3). Mitochondria are best known as multitasking organelles that participate in various cellular functions, such as ATP production, calcium homoeostasis, the generation of ROS, the intrinsic apoptotic pathway and steroid hormone biosynthesis (Amaral et al., 2013). Scientific reports have revealed that the changes in mitochondrial integrity/functionality will result in physiological dysfunction, including infertility and the loss of sperm function (particularly with decreased motility) (Pena et al., 2009, 2015; Amaral et al., 2013; Plaza Davila et al., 2015). In the MEQ-treated groups, the mitochondria exhibited swelling, vacuoles, loss of crests, and absolute dissolved mesenchyme in TEM analysis (Figure 4). Therefore, the obvious ultrastructural changes in the mitochondria in the present study might be responsible for the deficiency in spermatogenesis caused by MEQ. Additionally, the obvious aberration and dissolution of sperm as well as the destroyed integrity of BTB were noted when male mice were exposed to MEQ for 18 months (Figures 4, 5). Here, we not only proved the earlier findings that testis damage occurs after exposure to MEQ (Ihsan et al., 2011), but also firstly found that MEQ induced adverse effect on the mitochondrial and BTB, and caused toxicity to spermatogenesis, sperm development and sperm maturation.

It was illustrated that oxidative stress resulted in the serious damage to cellular macromolecules, such as DNA, lipids and proteins by causing disorder of the antioxidant defense system (Wang et al., 2015a). Herein, our results showed that the levels of MDA and 8-OHdG were significantly increased in the MEQ-treated groups (Figure 5), suggesting an imbalance of redox in male mice. The generation of ROS and unstable oxygen-sensitive radical intermediates of QdNOs were considered critical in DNA damage (Ganley et al., 2001; Poole et al., 2002; Junnotula et al., 2009; El-Khatib et al., 2010; Cheng et al., 2015). A lot of evidence suggested that the in vivo toxicity mediated by QdNOs was associated with oxidative stress. As the earlier findings suggested, the production of oxidative stress during the N→O reduction of QdNOs, was found to be a main factor in the QdNOs-mediated toxicity in testicular (Ihsan et al., 2011), spleen (Wang et al., 2011b), adrenal (Huang et al., 2009; Wang et al., 2016a,c), and liver (Wang et al., 2011b; Zhao et al., 2011; Liu et al., 2017), as well as genotoxicity (Wang et al., 2016d). Therefore, our data demonstrated that the oxidative stress triggered by MEQ may exhibit the toxicity to mitochondria, which is involved in the dysfunction of the reproductive system mediated by MEQ.

A lot of evidence suggested that the major metabolic pathway for QdNOs involves N→O group reduction (Cheng et al., 2015, 2016; Liu Q. et al., 2016), and that this type of metabolism is closely related to their toxicity (Hao et al., 2006; Chen et al., 2008, 2009). In this study, two metabolites of M4 and M8 were detected in the serum of male mice by LC/MS-IT-TOF analysis (Figure 7), which directly confirms the potential connection of N→O group reduction metabolism of MEQ with its organ toxicity. As many studies suggested, the toxicity of QdNOs was associated with their metabolites when these substances were extensively metabolized in vivo (Huang et al., 2009, 2010; Liu et al., 2017), and therefore, it comes important to understand the toxic metabolites, species differences and amount of toxic metabolites. The quantify of the toxic metabolites should be considered when determined the no-observed-adverse-effect-level (NOAEL) for reproductive toxicity of MEQ. However, the amount of the metabolites can’t be made due to the M4 and M8 standards were not used in this study. Further study should be conducted to make the toxic metabolites of MEQ in vivo quantitative. M4 and M8 were recognized as toxic metabolites in mice liver after the administration of MEQ for 11 months (Liu et al., 2017). In general, the drug is metabolized in the liver and then distributed into the blood. Here, the occurrence of M4 and M8 in the serum of male mice may be derived from the specific metabolic pathway of MEQ in the male liver under pathological conditions. Our recent study suggested that the specific metabolic pathway was considered an important consequence for the alteration of drug-metabolizing enzymes in response to the imbalance oxidative stress (Liu et al., 2017). Therefore, during N→O group reduction of MEQ, the highly reactive radicals including MEQ radical intermediates, as well as O₂^•- and HO^•, were generated and subsequently caused oxidative stress in mouse (Figure 11). These findings further confirmed our previous report of the proposed metabolic pathway of MEQ in mice, suggesting the critical role of the metabolism in organ toxicity induced by MEQ.

FIGURE 11

Blood-testis barrier, one of the tightest blood-tissue barriers, is crucial to male fertility as it physically divides the seminiferous epithelium into basal and apical compartments (Saunders, 2003; Liu W.Y. et al., 2012; Lu et al., 2016). The BTB prevents the diffusion of various endogenous and exogenous toxic substances from entering apical compartments, and was therefore considered as one of the most important pathways related to chemically induced reproductive toxicity (Siu et al., 2009; Lu et al., 2016; Zhang et al., 2016). The integrity of the BTB is based on various junctions, forming TJs, GJs and basal ESs, to provide structural and nutritional support to germ cells (Cheng et al., 2011; Zhang et al., 2016). The immunological and “fence” function of BTB is to facilitate spermiogenesis and spermiation during the epithelial cycle; dysfunction of the BTB will result in the disruption of spermatogenesis and infertility (Cheng and Mruk, 2012; Qiu et al., 2013). Regarding the reproductive toxicity induced by MEQ, only one study has been conducted, which identified M11, an N→O reduction metabolite of MEQ, in the testis of wistar rats accompanying oxidative stress (Ihsan et al., 2011), suggesting that M11 may pass through the BTB. M11 is factually the same metabolite than M8 identified in the present study. However, relatively little is known about whether the testis is one of the main target organs of MEQ. Furthermore, it has been well recognized that there are generally species-specific differences in the metabolism of drugs. Thus, potential toxic metabolites of MEQ in the testis of male mice, and the role of BTB-associated junctions in reproductive toxicity after exposure to MEQ still need to be illustrated.

To investigate whether the testis is the primary cellular target for MEQ to induce reproductive toxicity, and whether MEQ could pass through the BTB, we identified the MEQ and its metabolites in the testes of male mice by LC/MS-IT-TOF analysis. In a study of the relationship between the metabolites of MEQ and liver damage, the M4 and M8 were determined in the liver of mice accompanying the oxidative stress (Liu et al., 2017). Therefore, the M4 and M8 could be regarded as a biomarker of liver damage induced by MEQ. Herein, the M4 detected in the testes indicated a potential biomarker of reproductive toxicity caused by MEQ in male mice (Figure 8). Therefore, apart from oxidative stress, the metabolite of M4 was another main factor in reproductive toxicity and the changes in testicular structure. M4 was a hydroxylated product of the side chain of N1-MEQ, a partially reduced derivative of MEQ (Liu and Sun, 2013; Huang et al., 2015; Liu Q. et al., 2016). Previous studies revealed that N1-MEQ exhibited adrenal toxicity in H295R cells (Wang et al., 2016c) and genotoxicity in mice (Liu Q. et al., 2016). The connections of sperm abnormality with genotoxicity (Jagtap et al., 2014; Devaux et al., 2015; Dong et al., 2015; Das et al., 2016; Liu W. et al., 2016) and sex hormones (Liu W. et al., 2016; Cremonese et al., 2017; Ring et al., 2017) were well recognized. Commonly, alterations of sex hormones and steroidogenic pathways are associated with the function of the adrenal gland (Sohn et al., 2016). Therefore, apart from oxidative stress, the genotoxicity and adrenal toxicity may also participate in the sperm morphology, as evidenced by our observations in TEM analysis (Figure 11).

Interestingly, there are two metabolites of MEQ (M4 and M8) detected in the serum, while only M4 could pass through the BTB and appear in the testis, suggesting a higher degree of reproductive toxicity of M4 than M8. Besides the traditional O₂^•- and HO^•, the crucial oxygen-sensitive radical intermediates during the metabolism of QdNOs were found to be closely related to mutagenicity (Ganley et al., 2001), antibacterial activity (Cheng et al., 2015) and hypoxic cytotoxin (Junnotula et al., 2009; El-Khatib et al., 2010) caused by QdNOs. Additionally, the varying degree of toxicity of QdNOs contributed to the lasting-time of ROS (Wang et al., 2015b) and the stability of the radical intermediates (El-Khatib et al., 2010). Therefore, the stability of the radical intermediates plays a critical role in the toxicity induced by MEQ in vivo (Liu et al., 2017). M4 and M8 were generated from MEQ via intracellular single deoxidation and the hydroxylation of side chains, accompanying the production of ROS including O₂^•- and HO^• (Figure 12). Then, M4 and M8 undergo one-electron enzymatic reduction to yield highly reactive intermediates radicals of M4-R and M8-R, respectively. As is already known, methyl and hydroxyl are electron donors and electron-withdrawing groups, respectively. Close to an electron on a quinoxaline ring, a methyl and a hydroxyl were noted in M4-R, while two hydroxyl groups were seen in M8-R, suggesting a uniform distribution of the electron cloud in M4-R. Therefore, M4-R, which resulted from the addition of an electron to C3 of MEQ, is more stable, by resonance, and causes longer lasting and increased damage to the testis than M8-R, resulting from the addition of an electron to the C2 of MEQ. This may be an important reason for the higher reproductive toxicity of M4 than M8. Furthermore, this finding throws new light onto the drug intermediate radicals and organ toxicity of QdNOs.

FIGURE 12

To further reveal the possible mechanism responsible for the disruption of BTB caused by M4, the mRNA expression levels of BTB-associated junctions in the testis were evaluated. The results demonstrated that after exposure to MEQ for 18 months, the following mRNA expression of BTB-associated junctions was down-regulated: (1) basal ESs mRNA: N-cadherin, α-catenin and β-catenin; and (2) TJ integral membrane mRNA: CAR (25 and 110 mg/kg groups), Occludin (25 and 110 mg/kg groups) and ZO-1 (25 and 55 mg/kg groups) (Figure 10), while the mRNA expression of F11R and connexin-43, which belongs to TJs and GJs, respectively, were increased in all MEQ exposure groups (Figure 10). Although there is lack of (clear) dose response, the results are considered relevant as many factors may have contributed on the expression of mRNA. These findings indicated that the high level of F11R and connexin-43 expression may be a cellular protective response to MEQ reproductive toxicity (Figure 11). The integrity of the BTB is based on various junctions including basal ESs (N-cadherin, α-catenin and β-catenin), GJs (Connexin-43), and TJs (CAR, F11R, Occludin and ZO-1), to provide structural and nutritional support to germ cells (Cheng et al., 2011; Zhang et al., 2016). The immunological and “fence” function of BTB is to facilitate spermiogenesis and spermiation during the epithelial cycle (Cheng and Mruk, 2012; Qiu et al., 2013). Therefore, the disruptive effect of MEQ on BTB was initially mediated by suppression of the basal ESs and TJs-mRNA expression (Figure 11). The current result also suggested that the basal ESs and TJs might be the targets for M4 and the destroyed BTB further resulted in the invasion of M4 and other harmful substances into the testes to exert toxic effects on mitochondrion and spermatogenic cells.

Conclusion

The present study confirmed that M4 and M8 were potentially major toxic metabolites in oxidative damage in vivo, and demonstrated that the oxidative stress and metabolite M4 were involved in the reproductive toxicity in male mice after the administration of MEQ for 18 months. M4 passed through the BTB to interfere in spermatogenesis with the TJ- and basal ES-associated junctions as macromolecular targets. The higher reproductive toxicity of M4 than M8 might derive from the increased stability of M4-R than the radical that resulted from the M8. It is fascinating to pay more attention to the relationship between the oxidative stress, intermediate radicals and organ toxicity mediated by QdNOs. The genotoxicity and adrenal toxicity may contribute to the sperm abnormity caused by MEQ. Moreover, the current study also revealed that the mitochondrial dysfunction and spermatogenesis deficiency were induced by MEQ, and the further study needs to be conducted to investigate the underlying molecular mechanism.

References

• 1

  AmaralA.LourencoB.MarquesM.Ramalho-SantosJ. (2013). Mitochondria functionality and sperm quality.Reproduction146163–174. 10.1530/REP-13-0178

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 2

  AzquetaA.ArbillagaL.PachonG.CascanteM.CreppyE. E.Lopez de CerainA. (2007). A quinoxaline 1,4-di-N-oxide derivative induces DNA oxidative damage not attenuated by vitamin C and E treatment.Chem. Biol. Interact.16895–105. 10.1016/j.cbi.2007.02.013

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 3

  ChenQ.ChenY.QiY.HaoL.TangS.XiaoX. (2008). Characterization of carbadox-induced mutagenesis using a shuttle vector pSP189 in mammalian cells.Mutat. Res.63811–16. 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2007.08.006

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 4

  ChenQ.TangS. S.JinX.ZouJ. J.ChenK. P.ZhangT.et al (2009). Investigation of the genotoxicity of quinocetone, carbadox and olaquindox in vitro using Vero cells.Food Chem. Toxicol.47328–334. 10.1016/j.fct.2008.11.020

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 5

  ChengC. Y.MrukD. D. (2012). The blood-testis barrier and its implications for male contraception.Pharmacol. Rev.6416–64. 10.1124/pr.110.002790

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 6

  ChengC. Y.WongE. W.LieP. P.LiM. W.MrukD. D.YanH. H.et al (2011). Regulation of blood-testis barrier dynamics by desmosome, gap junction, hemidesmosome and polarity proteins: an unexpected turn of events.Spermatogenesis1105–115. 10.4161/spmg.1.2.15745

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 7

  ChengG.LiB.WangC.ZhangH.LiangG.WengZ.et al (2015). Systematic and molecular basis of the antibacterial action of Quinoxaline 1,4-Di-N-Oxides against Escherichia coli.PLOS ONE10:e0136450. 10.1371/journal.pone.0136450

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 8

  ChengG.SaW.CaoC.GuoL.HaoH.LiuZ.et al (2016). Quinoxaline 1,4-di-N-Oxides: biological activities and mechanisms of actions.Front. Pharmacol.7:64. 10.3389/fphar.2016.00064

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 9

  ChowdhuryG.KotandeniyaD.DanielsJ. S.BarnesC. L.GatesK. S. (2004). Enzyme-activated, hypoxia-selective DNA damage by 3-amino-2-quinoxalinecarbonitrile 1,4-di-N-oxide.Chem. Res. Toxicol.171399–1405. 10.1021/tx049836w

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 10

  CremoneseC.PiccoliC.PasqualottoF.ClapauchR.KoifmanR. J.KoifmanS.et al (2017). Occupational exposure to pesticides, reproductive hormone levels and sperm quality in young Brazilian men.Reprod. Toxicol.67174–185. 10.1016/j.reprotox.2017.01.001

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 11

  DaiC.TangS.LiD.ZhaoK.XiaoX. (2015). Curcumin attenuates quinocetone-induced oxidative stress and genotoxicity in human hepatocyte L02 cells.Toxicol. Mech. Methods25340–346. 10.3109/15376516.2015.1045659

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 12

  DasS.UpadhayaP.GiriS. (2016). Arsenic and smokeless tobacco induce genotoxicity, sperm abnormality as well as oxidative stress in mice in vivo.Genes Environ.38:4. 10.1186/s41021-016-0031-2

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 13

  DevauxA.BonyS.PlenetS.SagnesP.SeguraS.SuaireR.et al (2015). Field evidence of reproduction impairment through sperm DNA damage in the fish nase (Chondrostoma nasus) in anthropized hydrosystems.Aquat. Toxicol.169113–122. 10.1016/j.aquatox.2015.10.013

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 14

  DongJ.WangZ.ZouP.ZhangG.DongX.LingX.et al (2015). Induction of DNA damage and G2 cell cycle arrest by diepoxybutane through the activation of the Chk1-dependent pathway in mouse germ cells.Chem. Res. Toxicol.28518–531. 10.1021/tx500489r

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 15

  El-KhatibM.GearaF.HaddadinM. J.Gali-MuhtasibH. (2010). Cell death by the quinoxaline dioxide DCQ in human colon cancer cells is enhanced under hypoxia and is independent of p53 and p21.Radiat. Oncol.5:107. 10.1186/1748-717X-5-107

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 16

  GanleyB.ChowdhuryG.BhansaliJ.DanielsJ. S.GatesK. S. (2001). Redox-activated, hypoxia-selective DNA cleavage by quinoxaline 1,4-di-N-oxide.Bioorg. Med. Chem.92395–2401. 10.1016/S0968-0896(01)00163-8

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 17

  GB15193.17 (2003). Chronic Toxicity and Carcinogencity Study.Haidian District: National Institute of Standards of the People’s Republic of China, 109–113.

  • Google Scholar

• 18

  HaoL.ChenQ.XiaoX. (2006). Molecular mechanism of mutagenesis induced by olaquindox using a shuttle vector pSP189/mammalian cell system.Mutat. Res.59921–25. 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2005.12.017

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 19

  HuangL.YinF.PanY.ChenD.LiJ.WanD.et al (2015). Metabolism, distribution, and elimination of mequindox in pigs, chickens, and rats.J. Agric. Food Chem.639839–9849. 10.1021/acs.jafc.5b02780

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 20

  HuangX. J.IhsanA.WangX.DaiM. H.WangY. L.SuS. J.et al (2009). Long-term dose-dependent response of Mequindox on aldosterone, corticosterone and five steroidogenic enzyme mRNAs in the adrenal of male rats.Toxicol. Lett.191167–173. 10.1016/j.toxlet.2009.08.021

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 21

  HuangX. J.ZhangH. H.WangX.HuangL. L.ZhangL. Y.YanC. X.et al (2010). ROS mediated cytotoxicity of porcine adrenocortical cells induced by QdNOs derivatives in vitro.Chem. Biol. Interact.185227–234. 10.1016/j.cbi.2010.02.030

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 22

  IhsanA. (2011). Preclinical Toxicology of Mequindox.Ph.D. thesis, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan.

  • Google Scholar

• 23

  IhsanA.WangX.HuangX. J.LiuY.LiuQ.ZhouW.et al (2010). Acute and subchronic toxicological evaluation of Mequindox in Wistar rats.Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol.57307–314. 10.1016/j.yrtph.2010.03.011

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 24

  IhsanA.WangX.LiuZ.WangY.HuangX.LiuY.et al (2011). Long-term mequindox treatment induced endocrine and reproductive toxicity via oxidative stress in male Wistar rats.Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.252281–288. 10.1016/j.taap.2011.02.020

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 25

  IhsanA.WangX.TuH.-G.ZhangW.DaiM.-H.PengD.-P.et al (2013). Genotoxicity evaluation of Mequindox in different short-term tests.Food Chem. Toxicol.51330–336. 10.1016/j.fct.2012.10.003

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 26

  JagtapC. Y.ChaudhariS. Y.ThakkarJ. H.GalibR.PrajapatiP. K. (2014). Assessment of genotoxic potential of hridayarnava rasa (a herbo-mineralo-metallic ayurvedic formulation) using chromosomal aberration and sperm abnormality assays.Toxicol. Int.21242–247. 10.4103/0971-6580.155331

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 27

  JunnotulaV.SarkarU.SinhaS.GatesK. S. (2009). Initiation of DNA strand cleavage by 124-benzotriazine 14-dioxide antitumor agents: mechanistic insight from studies of 3-methyl-124-benzotriazine 14-dioxide.J. Am. Chem. Soc.1311015–1024. 10.1021/ja8049645

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 28

  LiG.YangF.HeL.DingH.SunN.LiuY.et al (2012). Pharmacokinetics of mequindox and its metabolites in rats after intravenous and oral administration.Res. Vet. Sci.931380–1386. 10.1016/j.rvsc.2012.02.015

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 29

  LiJ.HuangL. L.WangX.PanY. H.LiuZ. Y.ChenD. M.et al (2014). Metabolic disposition and excretion of quinocetone in rats, pigs, broilers, and carp.Food Chem. Toxicol.69109–119. 10.1016/j.fct.2014.04.004

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 30

  LiuJ.OuyangM.JiangJ.MuP.WuJ.YangQ.et al (2012). Mequindox induced cellular DNA damage via generation of reactive oxygen species.Mutat. Res.74170–75. 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2011.10.012

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 31

  LiuQ.LeiZ.HuangA.WuQ.XieS.AwaisI.et al (2017). Toxic metabolites, MAPK and Nrf2/Keap1 signaling pathways involved in oxidative toxicity in mice liver after chronic exposure to Mequindox.Sci. Rep.7:41854. 10.1038/srep41854

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 32

  LiuQ.ZhangJ.LuoX.IhsanA.LiuX.DaiM.et al (2016). Further investigations into the genotoxicity of quinoxaline-di-N-oxides and their primary metabolites.Food Chem. Toxicol.93145–157. 10.1016/j.fct.2016.04.029

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 33

  LiuW.GaoX.MaG.YanL.ChenT.LiT.et al (2016). Correlation of genetic results with testicular histology, hormones and sperm retrieval in nonobstructive azoospermia patients with testis biopsy.Andrologia49:e12705. 10.1111/and.12705

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 34

  LiuW. Y.WangZ. B.ZhangL. C.WeiX.LiL. (2012). Tight junction in blood-brain barrier: an overview of structure, regulation, and regulator substances.CNS Neurosci. Ther.18609–615. 10.1111/j.1755-5949.2012.00340.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 35

  LiuY. C.SiH. B.HeL. M.DingH. Z.HuangX. H.ChenJ. X.et al (2010). Identification of mequindox and its metabolites by high performance liquid chromatography combined with ion trap-time of flight-mass spectrometry.Chin. J. Anal. Chem.3882–86. 10.3724/SP.J.1096.2010.00082

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 36

  LiuZ. Y.HuangL. L.ChenD. M.YuanZ. H. (2010). Metabolism of mequindox in liver microsomes of rats, chicken and pigs.Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom.24909–918. 10.1002/rcm.4460

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 37

  LiuZ. Y.SunZ. L. (2013). The metabolism of carbadox, olaquindox, mequindox, quinocetone and cyadox: an overview.Med. Chem.91017–1027. 10.2174/1573406411309080002

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 38

  LuY.LuoB.LiJ.DaiJ. (2016). Perfluorooctanoic acid disrupts the blood-testis barrier and activates the TNFalpha/p38 MAPK signaling pathway in vivo and in vitro.Arch. Toxicol.90971–983. 10.1007/s00204-015-1492-y

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 39

  NRC (2004). The Development of Science based Guidelines for Laboratory Animal Care, Proceedings of the November 2003 International Workshop.Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

  • Google Scholar

• 40

  OECD (2009). Guideline for the Testing of Chemicals.Paris: OECD.

  • Google Scholar

• 41

  PenaF. J.Plaza DavilaM.BallB. A.SquiresE. L.Martin MuñozP.Ortega FerrusolaC.et al (2015). The impact of reproductive technologies on stallion mitochondrial function.Reprod. Domest. Anim.50529–537. 10.1111/rda.12551

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 42

  PenaF. J.Rodriguez MartinezH.TapiaJ. A.Ortega FerrusolaC.Gonzalez FernandezL.Macias GarciaB. (2009). Mitochondria in mammalian sperm physiology and pathology: a review.Reprod. Domest. Anim.44345–349. 10.1111/j.1439-0531.2008.01211.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 43

  Plaza DavilaM.Martin MunozP.TapiaJ. A.Ortega FerrusolaC.Balao da SilvaC. C.PenaF. J. (2015). Inhibition of mitochondrial complex I leads to decreased motility and membrane integrity related to increased hydrogen peroxide and reduced ATP production, while the inhibition of glycolysis has less impact on sperm motility.PLOS ONE10:e0138777. 10.1371/journal.pone.0138777

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 44

  PooleJ. S.HadadC. M.PlatzM. S.FredinZ. P.PickardL.GuerreroE. L.et al (2002). Photochemical electron transfer reactions of tirapazamine.Photochem. Photobiol.75339–345. 10.1562/0031-8655(2002)075<0339:PETROT>2.0.CO;2

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 45

  QiuL.ZhangX.ZhangX.ZhangY.GuJ.ChenM.et al (2013). Sertoli cell is a potential target for perfluorooctane sulfonate-induced reproductive dysfunction in male mice.Toxicol. Sci.135229–240. 10.1093/toxsci/kft129

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 46

  RingJ.WelliverC.ParenteauM.MarkwellS.BranniganR. E.KohlerT. S. (2017). The utility of sex hormone binding globulin in hypogonadism and infertile males.J. Urol.1971326–1331. 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.018

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 47

  SaundersP. T. (2003). Germ cell-somatic cell interactions during spermatogenesis.Reproduction6191–101.

  • Google Scholar

• 48

  SiuE. R.MrukD. D.PortoC. S.ChengC. Y. (2009). Cadmium-induced testicular injury.Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.238240–249. 10.1016/j.taap.2009.01.028

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 49

  SohnJ.KimS.KoschorreckJ.KhoY.ChoiK. (2016). Alteration of sex hormone levels and steroidogenic pathway by several low molecular weight phthalates and their metabolites in male zebrafish (Danio rerio) and/or human adrenal cell (H295R) line.J. Hazard. Mater.32045–54. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.08.008

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 50

  VicenteE.Perez-SilanesS.LimaL. M.AncizuS.BurgueteA.SolanoB.et al (2009). Selective activity against Mycobacteriumtuberculosis of new quinoxaline 14-di-N-oxides.Bioorg. Med. Chem.17385–389. 10.1016/j.bmc.2008.10.086

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 51

  WangX.FangG. J.WangY. L.IhsanA.HuangL. L.ZhouW.et al (2011a). Two generation reproduction and teratogenicity studies of feeding cyadox in Wistar rats.Food Chem. Toxicol.491068–1079. 10.1016/j.fct.2011.01.014

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 52

  WangX.HuangX. J.IhsanA.LiuZ. Y.HuangL. L.ZhangH. H.et al (2011b). Metabolites and JAK/STAT pathway were involved in the liver and spleen damage in male Wistar rats fed with mequindox.Toxicology280126–134. 10.1016/j.tox.2010.12.001

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 53

  WangX.BaiY.ChengG.IhsanA.ZhuF.WangY.et al (2016a). Genomic and proteomic analysis of the inhibition of synthesis and secretion of aldosterone hormone induced by quinocetone in NCI-H295R cells.Toxicology350–3521–14. 10.1016/j.tox.2016.03.005

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 54

  WangX.MartinezM. A.ChengG.LiuZ.HuangL.DaiM.et al (2016b). The critical role of oxidative stress in the toxicity and metabolism of quinoxaline 14-di-N-oxides in vitro and in vivo.Drug Metab. Rev.48159–182. 10.1080/03602532.2016.1189560

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 55

  WangX.WanD.IhsanA.LiuQ.ChengG.LiJ.et al (2015). Mechanism of adrenocortical toxicity induced by quinocetone and its bidesoxy-quinocetone metabolite in porcine adrenocortical cells in vitro.Food Chem. Toxicol.84115–124. 10.1016/j.fct.2015.08.016

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 56

  WangX.WuQ.WanD.LiuQ.ChenD.LiuZ.et al (2015a). Fumonisins: oxidative stress-mediated toxicity and metabolism in vivo and in vitro.Arch. Toxicol.9081–101. 10.1007/s00204-00015-01604-00208

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 57

  WangX.YangC.IhsanA.LuoX.GuoP.ChengG.et al (2016c). High risk of adrenal toxicity of N1-desoxy quinoxaline 14-dioxide derivatives and the protection of oligomeric proanthocyanidins (OPC) in the inhibition of the expression of aldosterone synthetase in H295R cells.Toxicology341–16. 10.1016/j.tox.2016.01.005

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 58

  WangX.YangP. P.LiJ.IhsanA.LiuQ. Y.ChengG. Y.et al (2016d). Genotoxic risk of quinocetone and its possible mechanism in in vitro studies.Toxicol. Res.5446–460. 10.1039/C5TX00341E

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 59

  WangX.ZhangH.HuangL.PanY.LiJ.ChenD.et al (2015b). Deoxidation rates play a critical role in DNA damage mediated by important synthetic drugs, quinoxaline 14-dioxides.Chem. Res. Toxicol.28470–481. 10.1021/tx5004326

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 60

  WuH.LiL.ShenJ.WangY.LiuK.ZhangS. (2012). In vitro metabolism of cyadox in rat, chicken and swine using ultra-performance liquid chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry.J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal.67–68, 175–185. 10.1016/j.jpba.2012.04.004

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 61

  WuY.YuH.WangY.HuangL.TaoY.ChenD.et al (2007). Development of a high-performance liquid chromatography method for the simultaneous quantification of quinoxaline-2-carboxylic acid and methyl-3-quinoxaline-2-carboxylic acid in animal tissues.J. Chromatogr. A11461–7. 10.1016/j.chroma.2006.11.024

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 62

  YangW.FuJ.XiaoX.YanH.BaoW.WangD.et al (2013). Quinocetone triggers oxidative stress and induces cytotoxicity and genotoxicity in human peripheral lymphocytes of both genders.J. Sci. Food Agric.931317–1325. 10.1002/jsfa.5891

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 63

  YangY.JiangL.SheY.ChenM.LiQ.YangG.et al (2015). Olaquindox induces DNA damage via the lysosomal and mitochondrial pathway involving ROS production and p53 activation in HEK293 cells.Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol.40792–799. 10.1016/j.etap.2015.09.008

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 64

  ZhangJ.LiZ.QieM.ZhengR.ShettyJ.WangJ. (2016). Sodium fluoride and sulfur dioxide affected male reproduction by disturbing blood-testis barrier in mice.Food Chem. Toxicol.94103–111. 10.1016/j.fct.2016.05.017

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 65

  ZhangK.BanM.ZhaoZ.ZhengH.WangX.WangM.et al (2012). Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of 14-bisdesoxyquinocetone, 3-methylquinoxaline-2-carboxylic acid (MQCA) in human hepatocytes.Res. Vet. Sci.931393–1401. 10.1016/j.rvsc.2012.06.012

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 66

  ZhangK.WangX.WangC.ZhengH.LiT.XiaoS.et al (2015). Investigation of quinocetone-induced mitochondrial damage and apoptosis in HepG2 cells and compared with its metabolites.Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol.39555–567. 10.1016/j.etap.2015.01.017

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 67

  ZhangK.ZhengW.ZhengH.WangC.WangM.LiT.et al (2014). Identification of oxidative stress and responsive genes of HepG2 cells exposed to quinocetone, and compared with its metabolites.Cell Biol. Toxicol.30313–329. 10.1007/s10565-014-9287-0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 68

  ZhaoX. J.HuangC.LeiH.NieX.TangH.WangY. (2011). Dynamic metabolic response of mice to acute mequindox exposure.J. Proteome Res.105183–5190. 10.1021/pr2006457

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 69

  ZouJ.ChenQ.TangS.JinX.ChenK.ZhangT.et al (2009). Olaquindox-induced genotoxicity and oxidative DNA damage in human hepatoma G2 (HepG2) cells.Mutat. Res.67627–33. 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2009.03.001

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar