Abstract
Recently, breakthroughs have been made in the use of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) to treat various diseases. Several stem cell types have been authorized as drugs by the European Medicines Agency and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. The Chinese official document “Notification of the management of stem cell clinical research (trial)” was also published in August 2015. Currently, China has approved 106 official stem cell clinical research filing agencies and 62 clinical research projects, which are mostly focused on MSC therapy. Hence, the optimization and development of stem cell drugs is imperative. During this process, maximizing MSC expansion, minimizing cell loss during MSC transplantation, improving the homing rate, precisely regulating the differentiation of MSCs, and reducing MSC senescence and apoptosis are major issues in MSC preclinical research. Similar to artemisinin extracted from the stems and leaves of Artemisia annua, ginsenoside Rg1 (Rg1) is purified from the root or stem of ginseng. In the human body, Rg1 regulates organ function, which is inseparable from its regulation of adult stem cells. Rg1 treatment may effectively regulate the proliferation, differentiation, senescence, and apoptosis of MSCs in different microenvironments in vitro or in vivo. In this review, we discuss recent advances in understanding the effect of Rg1 on MSCs and describe the issues that must be addressed and prospects regarding Rg1 regulation of MSCs in preclinical or clinical studies.
Introduction
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are a class of multipotent adult stem cells that show both self-renewal and high plasticity (Pittenger et al., 1999; He et al., 2018a; Wang et al., 2019). These cells can differentiate into adipocytes, osteoblasts, and chondrocytes in vitro and in vivo and secrete various anti-inflammatory cytokines and exosomes in different microenvironments (Chamberlain et al., 2007; Phinney and Pittenger, 2017). MSCs can be derived from many connective tissues and organ stroma, including bone marrow, Wharton's jelly of the umbilical cord, umbilical cord blood, adipose tissue, dental pulp, and periodontal tissues (Alison et al., 2000; Mastrolia et al., 2019). Meanwhile, these cells exhibit a fibroblastic morphology, adhere to a plastic surface when cultured in vitro, and share a common immunophenotype consisting of positive CD105, CD73, and CD90 expression and negative CD45, CD34, CD14, CD19, and HLA-DR expression (Wagers and Weissman, 2004). MSCs showing low immunogenicity are used for xenotransplantation to achieve immunomodulation and improve tissue regeneration (Jiang et al., 2002; He et al., 2018b). Thus, these cells are considered promising candidates in the management of several conditions, such as bone regeneration (Bruder et al., 1998), certain neurodegenerative disorders (Crigler et al., 2006), and graft-versus-host disease (Le Blanc et al., 2004).
Ginsenoside Rg1 (Rg1, molecular formula: C42H72O14, Figure 1, image from PubChem), which is derived from a hydride of a dammarane, is a monomer of a tetracyclic triterpenoid derivative. This molecule is mainly extracted and purified from the root or stem of ginseng (Leung and Wong, 2010; Xu et al., 2012). Ginsenosides are classified into 20(S)-protopanaxadiol (PPD) and 20(S)-protopanaxatriol (PPT) according to the hydroxylation position on their core triterpene saponin structure. Unlike PPD-type ginsenosides (e.g., ginsenoside Rb1 with four sugars) that are slowly excreted into bile, Rg1 with two sugars belonging to the PPT-type ginsenosides is primarily eliminated via rapid hepatobiliary excretion. Therefore, the specific molecular structure of Rg1 is a major determinant of Rg1 plasma pharmacokinetics and may also be a factor in drug interactions between Rg1 and its target molecules. In general, Rg1 can affect the nervous, cardiovascular, blood, and immune systems, showing various pharmacological activities (Lee et al., 1997; Fang and Limei, 2016). Rg1 has nutritional and protective effects on neurons and can reduce the apoptosis of nerve cells (Radad et al., 2004). Rg1 can be used to treat myocardial ischemia, long QT syndrome, and atherosclerosis by dilating coronary vessels, promote K+ outflow, and inhibit the proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells (Wei et al., 2007; Lee and Kim, 2014). The effect of Rg1 on the endocrine system is similar to that of steroid hormones; for instance, Rg1 can compete with dexamethasone to bind glucocorticoid receptors to promote the secretion function of cells, and it can be blocked by estrogen receptor antagonists (Chan et al., 2002). Rg1 can also improve nonspecific immunity in humans and promote the hematopoietic and immune function recovery of patients with bone marrow injury; thus, this molecule can be used to treat various immune and hematopoietic system diseases (Lee et al., 2004; Xu et al., 2012). Simultaneously, five clinical trials on the use of drugs containing Rg1 to treat vascular dementia, cognitive changes, Sjögren's syndrome, rheumatic diseases, and stroke, as well as a safety evaluation, have been registered on clinicaltrials.gov; three of these trials have completed recruitment, and the related results have been published; two have not yet completed subject recruitment (Sotaniemi et al., 1995; Ellis and Reddy, 2002; Scholey et al., 2010; Ossoukhova et al., 2015; Shin et al., 2016; Tian et al., 2016).
Figure 1
The molecular structure of ginsenoside Rg1.
In recent years, the characteristics, functions, and therapeutic effects of MSCs and the pharmacological effects of Rg1 have been extensively studied (Zhan et al., 2014; Shyh-Chang and Ng, 2017; Jin et al., 2019). The effect and mechanism of Rg1 on the biological characteristics and functions of MSCs is becoming increasingly clear. Multiple studies have found that Rg1 regulates the proliferation, differentiation, aging, and apoptosis of MSCs and thus affects tissue repair in the body.
Optimization of the Effective Concentration of Rg1
Appropriate concentrations of Rg1 can effectively regulate the expression of functional proteins and the secretion of active cytokines in MSCs, and overdosages can cause toxicity to cells and tissues (Liu et al., 2005; Mohanan et al., 2018). Traditionally, the active ingredients in ginseng are believed to be good nutritional supplements for pregnant women and beneficial for fetal development (Tiran, 2003; Ong et al., 2005). Recent studies have found that some concentration of Rg1 may have embryotoxic effects (Liu et al., 2006; Mohammed et al., 2016). In studies using the whole embryo culture technique, culturing with Rg1 (62.4 mM for mice and 37.4 mM for rats) for 48 h reduced the total embryo morphological score, which is based on the crown-rump length, head length, flexion scores, forelimb bud scores, and hindlimb bud scores. Furthermore, the development of the heart; neural tube; cerebral vesicles; otic, optic, and olfactory organs; branchial arch; maxilla; mandible; yolk sac vasculature; and allantois was also affected by increased concentrations of Rg1 (Liu et al., 2006). In contrast, a low concentration of Rg1 (62.5–10000 nM) may have a slight effect on chick cardiomyocytes and mouse D3 stem cells (Mohammed et al., 2016). Therefore, pregnant women should be cautious when using ginseng or ginsenoside Rg1 during the first three months of pregnancy. This molecule should be administered at low concentrations. Studies have also shown that 1,000 μg/L Rg1 inhibits the proliferation of rat bone marrow MSCs (BMSCs) (Fu and Zheng, 2013), and Rg1 concentrations exceeding 100 mol/L are cytotoxic to human periodontal ligament stem cells (hPDLSCs) (Yin et al., 2015). Therefore, systematic and comprehensive studies need to be performed to clarify the toxic effects of different concentrations of Rg1 on human MSCs. In addition, we evaluated and classified the effective, ineffective, and inhibitory properties of Rg1 on the proliferation of MSCs in vitro and summarized and analyzed the effects of different Rg1 concentrations, hoping to provide a reference for subsequent studies (Supporting Information 1).
Rg1 Regulates the Proliferation and Differentiation of MSCs
Conventionally, MSCs are separated and purified by adhering to plastic and undergoing serial passaging in vitro to expand the primary cells (Bruder et al., 1997; Le Blanc and Ringden, 2007). For the MSC drug preparation process, the MSC proliferation rate must be increased and sufficient amounts of purified MSCs must be obtained (Ikada, 2006; Ikebe and Suzuki, 2014). Furthermore, enhancing the differentiation of MSCs into neurocyte cells, endothelial cells, or bone cells will contribute to the treatment of clinical diseases, such as neuronal disease, cardiovascular disease, and bone injury (Deans and Moseley, 2000). At present, studies have shown that Rg1 can positively regulate the proliferation of MSCs from various adult tissues (Table 1) and induce the directional differentiation of MSCs in different environments (Table 2, Figure 2).
Table 1
| Study | MSC source | Proliferation | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dong et al. (2017) | Mouse adipose tissue | MTT↑ | Cells during isobutylmethylxanthine neural induction |
| Gu et al. (2016) | Rat bone marrow | EdU+ cells, CCK8↑ | |
| Hu et al. (2016) | Rat bone marrow | CCK8↑ | Cells inhibited by H2O2 |
| Liu et al. (2016) | Human umbilical cord blood | Colony-forming unit of fibroblasts (CFU-F), CCK8↑ | Cells inhibited by tert-butyl hydroperoxide |
| Xu et al. (2016) | Human adipose tissue | CCK8↑ | Rg1 combined with platelet-rich fibrin |
| Xu et al. (2014) | Human adipose tissue | CCK8↑ | Cells during the neurogenic differentiation process |
| Xu et al. (2015) | Human adipose tissue | CCK8↑ | Cells during the chondrogenic induction process |
| Yin et al. (2015) | Human periodontal ligament | MTT↑ | Cells during dexamethasone osteogenic induction |
| Wang et al. (2014) | Human dental pulp | G0/G1↓; [3H]-Thymidine incorporation assay, S phase↑, |
|
| Wang et al. (2012) | Human dental pulp | G0/G1↓; colony-forming unit, MTT, S phase↑ |
|
| Wang et al. (2007) | Rat bone marrow | CFU-F, [3H]-thymidine incorporation assay, GATA1 and GATA2, binding activities of GATA and DNA, MTT↑ | |
| Guo et al. (2017) | Human bone marrow | MTT↑ | Rg1-loaded alginate-chitosan microspheres |
| Fu and Zheng (2013) | Rat bone marrow | MTT↑ | Cells during hypoxia/serum deprivation |
Ginsenoside Rg1 promotes MSC proliferation in vitro.
Table 2
| Study | MSC source | Differentiation effects | Related mechanism |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dong et al. (2017) | Mouse adipose tissue | Neural differentiation induced by isobutylmethylxanthine↑ | Small C-terminal domain phosphatase 1↓; miRNA-124, Nestin, β-tubulin III↑ |
| Xu et al. (2014) | Human adipose tissue | Neural differentiation in neural inductive conditioned medium↑ | NSEa, microtubule-associated protein-2, growth-associated protein-43, neural cell adhesion molecule, synapsin-1↑ |
| Wu et al. (2011) | Rat bone marrow | Neural differentiation inhibited by the brain homogenate of a rat dementia model↑ | NSEa positive cells↑ |
| Zuo et al. (2007) | Rat bone marrow | Neural differentiation↑ | NSEa, nerve growth factor↑ |
| Guo et al. (2017) | Human bone marrow | Rg1-loaded alginate-chitosan microspheres promote neural differentiation | Nestin, NSEa, glial fibrillary acidic protein↑ |
| Gu et al. (2016) | Rat bone marrow | Osteogenic differentiation↑ | ALPb, Alizarin red staining, RUNX2, BMP-2, collagen I, osteocalcin↑; regulate the GR-dependent BMP/Smad pathway |
| Yin et al. (2015) | Human periodontal ligament | Osteogenic differentiation in dexamethasone induction↑ | ALPb activity, RUNX2c, collagen I, osteopontin, osteocalcin↑ |
| Wang et al. (2014) | Human dental pulp | Odontogenic/osteogenic differentiation↑ | Dentin sialoprotein, DSPPd, ALPb, osteocalcin, bone morphogenetic protein-2, fibroblast growth factor 2↑ |
| Huang et al. (2016) | Mouse bone marrow | Osteogenic differentiation inhibited by malondialdehyde↑ | calcium nodule, ALPb, Runx2c↑ |
| Xu et al. (2015) | Human adipose tissue | Cartilage differentiation in osteogenic induction medium↑ | Collagen II, collagen XI, acid phosphatase, cartilage oligomeric matrix protein, ELASTIN↑ |
| Wang et al. (2012) | Human dental pulp | Odontoblast-like cells↑ | ALPb; DSPPd, DMP1e↑ |
| Wang and Yaping (2012) | Human dental pulp | Rg1 combined with rhBMP-2 promotes odontogenic differentiation | ALPb activity, DSPPd, DMPle↑ |
| He et al. (2011) | Human bone marrow | Endothelial differentiation in an indirect coculture with human umbilical vein endothelial cells↑ | Von Willebrand factor, VE-cadherin, CD31↑ |
| Li et al. (2011) | Rat bone marrow | Induced pluripotent stem cell differentiation↑ | Nanog, c-Myc, Oct, Klf4, Sox2↑ |
Ginsenoside Rg1 promotes the directional differentiation of MSCs in vitro.
NSE : Neuron-specific enolase.
ALP : Alkaline phosphatase.
RUNX2 : Runt-related transcription factor 2.
DSPP : Dentin sialophosphoprotein.
DMP1 : Dentin matrix protein 1.
Figure 2
The main molecular mechanism by which Rg1 affects the proliferation and differentiation of MSCs (GATA, GATA-binding factor; NSE, neuron-specific enolase; GFAP, glial fibrillary acidic protein; NGF, nerve growth factor; GAP-43, growth-associated protein 43; NCAM, neural cell adhesion molecule; SYN, synaptophysin; MAP-2, microtubule-associated protein 2; SCP-1, small C-terminal domain phosphatase 1; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; OCN, osteocalcin; COL, collagen; BMP-2, bone morphogenetic protein 2; RUNX2, runt-related transcription factor 2; COMP, cartilage oligomeric matrix protein; DSPP, dentin sialophosphoprotein; BMP-2, bone morphogenetic protein 2; FGF2, fibroblast growth factor 2; vWF, von Willebrand factor; VE-cadherin, vascular endothelial cadherin; Nanog, c-Mcy, Oct, Klf4 and Sox2: embryonic stem cell-related transcription factors).
Initially, bone marrow was used as the main source to isolate MSCs, and methods for harvesting BMSCs are highly invasive. The limited number and maximal life span of primary MSCs harvested from bone marrow is a major challenge in the clinical use of these cells (Jiang et al., 2002; Kern et al., 2006). In previous experiments, Rg1 could promote the proliferation of rat BMSCs by upregulating the expression of GATA1 and GATA2 and enhancing their binding to DNA (Wang et al., 2007). Reports have also shown that 10 μmol/L Rg1 can promote the neuron-specific enolase (NSE) expression of rat BMSCs in low-glucose Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) with or without brain homogenates from rats with dementia; furthermore, this treatment prevented the brain homogenate (dementia rats) induced inhibition of neuronal differentiation and enhanced the differentiation of BMSCs into specific subpopulations of neuron-like cells that express nerve growth factor (NGF) mRNA (Zuo et al., 2007; Wu et al., 2011). Moreover, Rg1-loaded alginate-chitosan microspheres were also shown to promote the proliferation and neuron-like differentiation of human BMSCs, increasing the expression of Nestin, NSE, and GFAP (Guo et al., 2017). This finding suggests that Rg1 can be used in the drug delivery/release studies and tissue engineering. However, no studies have explored the detailed mechanism by which Rg1 induces MSCs to differentiate into neuron-like cells with specific functions. For example, studies investigating the regulatory effects of Rg1 on BMSC differentiation into dopaminergic neurons or cholinergic neurons are needed. Therefore, clarification of the regulatory methods and related mechanisms of Rg1 may also be a “breakthrough point” for the treatment of neuronal disease such as Parkinson's disease and Alzheimer's disease and related neurological disorders in vivo.
Rg1 can also promote the differentiation of human BMSCs into endothelial cells. Experiments involving BMSCs and human umbilical vein endothelial cells cocultured in a transwell system showed that 20 to 80 μg/ml Rg1 gradually increased the mRNA and protein levels of mature endothelial cell-specific markers in BMSCs, such as CD31, VWF, and VE-cadherin, in a dose-dependent manner. At the same time, electron microscopy showed that the characteristic endothelial Weibel-Palade bodies were observed in BMSCs (He et al., 2011). Animal experiments in vivo have also confirmed that Rg1 can stimulate the myocardial tissue secretion of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), which promotes the homing of rabbit BMSCs to myocardial tissue and differentiation into vascular endothelial cells. These changes reduced the myocardial infarct size and improved cardiac function (Wang et al., 2005). Notably, restenosis is the most common complication of stent surgery for cardiovascular diseases, and its pathological mechanism involves the delayed formation of vascular endothelial cells and the proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells (Nobuyoshi et al., 1991; Ferns and Avades, 2000; Tonino et al., 2009). The abovementioned study showed that Rg1 can promote the differentiation of MSCs into vascular endothelial cells. Thus, loading Rg1 or MSCs onto vascular balloons (Schwartz et al., 1990) or stents (Hoffmann et al., 1996; Nakatani et al., 2003) may be an effective method to promote endothelial cell regeneration. Besides, whether Rg1 can combine with MSCs to inhibit the proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells remains unknown. Therefore, demonstrating that Rg1 combined with MSCs can enhance endothelial cell proliferation while inhibiting smooth muscle cell proliferation will support this hypothesis and provide a strategy for restenosis therapy.
Rg1 can promote the osteogenic differentiation of rat BMSCs and has a protective effect on the malondialdehyde-inhibited osteogenic differentiation of mouse BMSCs. The molecular mechanism involved increased formation of calcium nodules and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity and upregulation of the mRNA and protein levels of ALP and Runt-related transcription factor 2 (Runx2) (Gu et al., 2016; Huang et al., 2016). In addition, Rg1 can mobilize glucocorticoid receptors to form homodimers and transfer to the rat BMSC nucleus, promoting the increased transcription of glucocorticoid receptor-sensitive genes, such as mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphatase-1 (MKP-1) and glucocorticoid-regulated kinase (SGK). Then, bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) is activated to increase the expression of p-Smad1/5/8 (glucocorticoid receptor-dependent BMP-2/Smad signaling pathway); upregulates the protein expression of osteogenic proteins such as ALP, CON, COL1, BMP-2, and Runx2 in BMSCs; enhances bone calcification; and finally, promotes bone healing in rats (Gu et al., 2016). The positive effect of Rg1 on the osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs has been established. However, periosteal tissues and periosteal stem cells are the main mobilization components involved in bone repair after a fracture (Tonna, 1960; Debnath et al., 2018). How Rg1 promotes the differentiation of BMSCs into bone cells in the bone “stem cell niche” to promote fracture healing still needs to be elucidated. Furthermore, whether the intraperitoneally injected Rg1 described in the above study mainly exerts osteogenic and bone-healing effects by directly acting on periosteal stem cells in rats requires further confirmation.
In α-MEM culture, addition of Rg1 (6.25 μmol/L) to cultured rat BMSCs for 30 days increased the mRNA levels of Nanog, c-Mcy, Oct, Klf4, and Sox2. Some scholars believe that Nanog-positive cells and embryonic stem cells are difficult to distinguish via their gene expression profiles. Therefore, based on gene expression analyses, they concluded that Rg1 may promote the conversion of BMSCs to induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSs) (Takahashi et al., 2007; Li et al., 2011). However, it is difficult to explain the iPS-promoting effect of Rg1 based only on gene expression. At the same time, one study also showed that 1 μg/ml Rg1 can effectively increase the efficiency of mouse embryonic fibroblast conversion to iPSs (Hu et al., 2014). The success rate of Rg1-induced iPSs and the tumorigenicity and safety of the induced iPSs in the above studies require further analyses.
Compared with BMSCs, adipose-derived MSCs (ADSCs) are easy to obtain and result in less trauma during tissue extraction, indicating that they are ideal seed cells for tissue engineering (Puissant et al., 2005; Kern et al., 2006; Bourin et al., 2013). Rg1 and platelet fibrin (PRF) can enhance the proliferation, differentiation, and soft tissue regeneration of human breast adipose ADSCs in collagen type I sponge scaffolds in vitro and in vivo. Three weeks after the subcutaneous transplantation of Rg1 in combination with PRF-treated human breast ADSC-loaded type I sponge scaffolds, the “adipose tissue block” wet weight, number of adipocytes, intracellular lipid levels, microvascular density, and gene and protein levels of VEGF, HIF-1α, and PPARγ were significantly improved, and a broad new organizational network was also formed. These results suggested that Rg1 and PRF combined with 3D culture can enhance the effects of MSCs in soft tissue regeneration in tissue engineering studies (Xu et al., 2016). However, the occurrence of related risk factors, such as tumors and cancer, must be considered in the formation of various new tissues. For instance, RUNX2 is a transcription factor belonging to the RUNX family and plays a key role in osteoblast differentiation (Komori, 2018). This molecule is also considered a marker of MSCs found in tumors and is involved in various signaling pathways of cancer growth processes (Ozaki et al., 2018). New research has found that lyophilized PRF can mediate Runx2-enhanced craniofacial bone regeneration (Li et al., 2014). Furthermore, Rg1 can stimulate human umbilical vein endothelial cells to undergo angiogenesis via the miR-23a/RUNX2/VEGF-A pathway (Wu et al., 2017). Therefore, key factors, such as the presence of bone tissue components in the “adipose tissue block” induced by PRF and Rg1 and the correlation between Runx2 expression in transplanted adipose stem cells and tumor formation, must be clarified before clinical trials.
Rg1 can increase the proliferation and neurodifferentiation of human ADSCs. In human ADSCs grown in nerve-inducing medium, Rg1 at concentrations of 10, 50, and 100 μg/ml can gradually increase proliferation; enhance the gene transcription levels of growth-associated protein 43 (GAP-43), neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM), and synapse protein 1 (SYN-1); and increase the protein expression levels of NSE and microtubule-associated protein-2 (MAP-2) (Xu et al., 2014). In addition, Rg1 can increase the expression of miRNA-124, degrade the protein expression of the neuronal differentiation inhibitor small C-terminal domain phosphatase 1, and increase the protein levels of nestin and βIII-tubulin, thereby promoting the differentiation of ADSCs into nerve-like cells after induction by isobutylmethylxanthine (IBMX) (Dong et al., 2017). In cartilage-inducing medium, Rg1 can enhance the proliferative capacity of third-generation human breast ADSCs in the early stage (6 days after seeding) and promote the phenotypic differentiation of chondrocytes in the late phase (2 weeks after seeding) by, for example, enhancing the mRNA levels of collagen type II (CO-II), collagen type XI (CO-XI), acid phosphatase (CO-XI), cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP), and ELASTIN (elastin). Researchers have suggested that third-generation human ADSCs can be used for in vitro cartilage regeneration and that the addition of Rg1 at different time points can effectively regulate the proliferation and cartilage differentiation of human breast ADSCs (Xu et al., 2015).
Rg1 can promote the proliferation of dental pulp and PDLSCs, the differentiation of human dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) into odontoblasts, and the differentiation of human PDLSCs into osteoblasts, indicating its promising application prospects in the field of dental and oral and maxillofacial regenerative medicine. Rg1 can promote the proliferation and differentiation of human DPSCs via 2059 differentially expressed genes; for example, Rg1 increases the gene expression of DSPP, DMP1, ALP, OCN, BMP-2, and FGF2 and the protein expression of BMP-2 and FGF2 in DPSCs (Wang et al., 2012, 2014). At the same time, the combination of Rg1 and rhBMP-2 can enhance the odontogenetic differentiation of human DPSCs (Wang and Yaping, 2012). Therefore, the application of Rg1 as a pulp capping agent in clinical pulp capping surgery may be a new breakthrough for the promotion of DPSC proliferation and differentiation, which will be beneficial for regenerating dental pulp and promoting the subsequent formation of reparative dentin. A 10 µmol/L Rg1 solution can increase the proliferation of PDLSCs and enhance the ALP, RUNX2, collagen I, osteopontin (OPN), and osteocalcin (OCN) expression in hPDLSCs, ultimately promoting the osteogenic differentiation of human PDLSCs. However, concentrations of Rg1 exceeding 100 μmol/L inhibited cell proliferation (Yin et al., 2015). Interestingly, dental pulp, periodontal ligaments, dentin, cementum, and intrinsic alveolar bone all originate from ectodermal mesenchymal tissue (exo-mesenchymal), which is developed from ectodermal neural crest cells. Nerve-supporting cells or neurogliocytes (Schwann cells and Schwann cell precursors, etc.) transfer to the dental pulp tissues during early development to form dental pulp MSCs (Kaukua et al., 2014). This phenomenon indicates that the MSCs stored in the connective tissue of the oral cavity, especially in dents, may be different from traditional mesenchymal-derived MSCs and may show enhanced neurological differentiation.
Rg1 Relieves the Aging of MSCS
With the increase in MSC passage number in vitro and the aging of human organs, telomere length shortens after each division cycle, which leads to gradual senescence (Fehrer and Lepperdinger, 2005; Alt et al., 2012). The mean telomere length of BMSCs decreased from 9.19 kbp to 8.7 kbp from passages 1 to 9 (Bonab et al., 2006). Mesenchymal and hematopoietic stem cells can form a unique bone marrow niche, the members of which are closely related and influence each other (Wilson and Trumpp, 2006; Méndez-Ferrer et al., 2010). Rg1 can enhance the antiaging effects of hematopoietic stem cells and the hematopoietic microenvironment (partly by regulating the secretion of MSCs), prevent cognitive impairment and hippocampus senescence, antagonize spleen and thymus damage induced by D-galactose (D-gal), and ameliorate induced aging animal models by alleviating oxidative stress injury and downregulating the expression of senescence-associated proteins (Zhu et al., 2014; Tang et al., 2015; Sun et al., 2018). Similarly, Rg1 has antiaging effects on MSCs and cooperates with other supporting cells to protect tissues and organs. After rats were treated with D-gal and Rg1, BMSCs were extracted from the bone marrow for culture. In three-passage cultures, the MSCs isolated from Rg1-treated rats showed enhanced antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties and a strong ability to resist hematopoietic microenvironment senescence, exhibiting features such as a reduced percentage of SA-β-gal+ cells, reduced reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels, reduced malondialdehyde (MDA) activity, and reduced expression of inflammatory markers (IL-6, IL-2, TNF-α) and senescence-associated proteins (p16, p21, p53) as well as an increased S phase cell percentage, increased superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity, and increased stem cell factor (SCF) expression. At the same time, Rg1 also showed increased antioxidant and partial anti-inflammatory properties in normal rats (Hu et al., 2015). These results indicate that Rg1 can regulate MSCs to affect the microenvironment and thus enhance hematopoiesis. This finding suggests a new strategy for addressing the insufficient hematopoietic stem cell quantity, the low homing rate of transplanted hematopoietic stem cells, and the delayed implantation of hematopoietic stem cells in the bone marrow during hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
Furthermore, the fact that different culture environmental conditions can also affect telomeres and significantly increase or decrease the culture life span in vitro (von Zglinicki et al., 1995) still needs to be addressed. Thus, the culture and treatment of MSCs with Rg1 may minimize the effect of serum-free medium, the culture temperature, and the oxygen content on aging in vitro, which need to be investigated before MSCs can be used therapeutically.
Rg1 Inhibits MSC Apoptosis
To maintain a stable environment in the body, genes control the autonomous and orderly death of cells (Wyllie et al., 1980; Schwartz and Osborne, 1993). A study showed that more than 99% of MSCs injected into the left ventricle of CB17 SCID/beige adult mice died within 4 days of injection, which reflects the harsh, proapoptotic microenvironment of the infarcted heart; this environment may not be conducive to MSC survival (Geng, 2003). Hence, protection of MSCs from apoptosis may improve their success rate in treating tissue ischemia and hypoxia-related diseases (Zhu et al., 2006).
Rg1 has extensive antiapoptotic effects in different apoptotic models (Table 3, Figure 3). Rg1 can reduce apoptosis and increase the water content in the brain tissues of ischemia-reperfusion rats. Transplanted human BMSCs in rats can differentiate into neurons and neurogliocytes to improve cerebral ischemia. More importantly, Rg1 combined with human BMSCs showed better antiapoptotic effects and resulted in better brain recovery than single Rg1 or BMSC treatments (Bao et al., 2015). Rg1 can counteract the apoptosis of BMSCs induced by various stimuli, and the expression levels and ratio of Bcl-2/Bax are key factors in the Rg1-induced resistance of BMSCs to apoptosis. Rg1 can reduce Bax expression and enhance Bcl-2 expression to protect against hypoxia-reoxygenation-induced apoptosis of human BMSCs (Guo et al., 2017), MDA-induced apoptosis of mouse BMSCs (Li et al., 2013), and hypoxia and serum deprivation-induced apoptosis of rat BMSCs (Fu and Zheng, 2013). Rg1 can also activate the phosphoinositide 3-kinase/protein kinase B (PI3K/Akt) signaling pathway to protect against the hydrogen peroxide (H2O2)-induced apoptosis of rat BMSCs. The mechanism involves downregulating Bax, cleaving caspase-3, and upregulating Bcl-2 and phosphorylated Akt at the protein level (Hu et al., 2016). Furthermore, in an in vivo experiment involving the in situ injection of Rg1-treated rat BMSCs to treat hindlimb arterial embolization in rats, Rg1 improved the survival of transplanted BMSCs and protected BMSCs from apoptosis induced by ischemia. The Rg1 mechanisms in the above study involve the activation and upregulation of miR-494-3p to inhibit ROCK-1 gene expression, upregulation of the antiapoptotic gene Bcl-2, downregulation of the proapoptotic genes Bax and Bad, inhibition of the Bax and Bcl-2 protein interaction to prohibit heterodimer formation, and inhibition of the release of cytochrome C from mitochondria and caspase-3 activation (Zheng et al., 2018).
Table 3
| Study | MSC source | Reagent for cell apoptosis | Effects | Related mechanism |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gu et al. (2016) | Rat bone marrow | Dexamethasone? | Inhibit apoptosis; Annexin V/propidium iodide↓ |
|
| Hu et al. (2016) | Rat bone marrow | H2O2 | inhibit apoptosis; TUNEL staining, Annexin V/propidium iodide↓ |
Cleaved caspase-3/total caspase-3↓; Bcl-2/Bax, p-Akt/Akt↑ |
| Liu et al. (2016) | Human umbilical cord blood | Tert-Butyl hydroperoxide | Inhibit apoptosis; Annexin V-FITC/7-AAD, TUNEL-positive cells, condensation and fragmentation of nuclei↓ |
Activate the Akt-FoxO3a-Bim pathway; LDH, MDA, cleaved caspase-3, Bim, FoxO3a (nucleus)↓; Bcl-2/Bax, SOD, pAKT/AKT, pFoxO3a/FoxO3a, FoxO3a (cytoplasm)↑ |
| Guo et al. (2017) | Human bone marrow | Hypoxia-reoxygenation | Inhibit apoptosis | Bcl-2↓; Bax↑ |
| Li et al. (2013) | Mouse bone marrow | Malondialdehyde | Rg1-loaded alginate-chitosan microspheres inhibit apoptosis; TUNEL-positive cells↓ |
Bax, caspase-3↓; Bcl-2↑ |
| Fu and Zheng (2013) | Rat bone marrow | Hypoxia/serum deprivation | Inhibit apoptosis; Annexin V-FITC/propidium iodide↓ |
Stable mitochondrial membrane structure and function; caspase-3 activity, Bad, Bax↓;Bcl-2↑ |
Ginsenoside Rg1 inhibits MSC apoptosis in vitro.
Figure 3
The main molecular mechanism by which Rg1 affects the apoptosis of MSCs (Bad, Bcl2-associated agonist of cell death; Bcl-2, B cell lymphoma 2; Bax, B cell lymphoma/leukemia-2-associated X protein; ROCK-1, Rho-associated coiled-coil containing protein kinase 1; PI3K, phosphoinositide 3-kinases; AKT, protein kinase B; FoxO3, forkhead box O3; p-FoxO3, phosphorylated forkhead box O3).
Tert-butyl hydroperoxide (t-BHP) was shown to reduce the Bcl-2/Bax ratio and stimulate ROS formation to enhance apoptosis (Kowaltowski and Fiskum, 2005; Lee et al., 2012). Rg1 can enhance the survival rate and antiapoptotic effects of human umbilical cord blood-derived stromal cells (hUCBDSCs) induced by t-BHP. The mechanism involves activation of the PI3K-Akt pathway and induction of FoxO3a phosphorylation, resulting in the translocation of FoxO3a from the nucleus to the cytoplasm; these changes reduce Bim expression and increase the Bcl-2/Bax ratio to inhibit apoptosis (Liu et al., 2016). Interestingly, MSCs can reside in a state of reversible growth arrest, or quiescence, for prolonged periods of time, and cells in this state are called “idle” stem cells (van Velthoven and Rando, 2019). Do nonapoptotic MSCs protected by Rg1 remain in an “idle” state? Clarifying this question may explain the mechanism underlying the functional maintenance of quiescent “idle” MSCs and activation of MSCs to modify tissue homeostasis in a specific environment, such as hypoxia and ischemia.
Conclusions and Remarks
We comprehensively visualized the main molecular mechanism by which Rg1 affects the proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis of MSCs described in the above papers (Figures 2 and 3). This result may provide a useful reference and ideas for further experimental research on Rg1. In summary, Rg1 shows promising application prospects with regard to MSCs and its microenvironmental regulatory effects in vitro and in several animal disease models in vivo (Table 4). During the expansion of pretreatment MSCs in vitro, various uncontrollable factors, such as differences in culture systems, culture environment, and reagents, may be encountered, which may affect the MSC quality before clinical infusion or use in tissue engineering. The application of Rg1 may provide an effective solution for these issues. Furthermore, although current studies have shown that Rg1 can effectively regulate the proliferation and differentiation of MSCs while controlling senescence and apoptosis in vivo, how to minimize the toxicity of Rg1, how Rg1 functions in a specific “stem cell niche,” how to utilize Rg1 to precisely regulate MSC-directed differentiation in the microenvironment, and how Rg1 affects the balance between “idle” and activated MSC populations to maintain homeostasis or repair the human body still require additional, in-depth studies.
Table 4
| Study | Animal model | Rg1 dosage | Administration methods | Study object | Therapeutic effect | Related mechanism |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xu et al. (2016) | Untreated nude mice | 10 μg/ml | Collagen scaffold-loaded adipose MSCs plus Rg1 or/and PRF mouse subcutaneous transplantation | Scaffold transplant | Wet weight of the transplant, adipogenesis, microvessel density↑ | PPARγ, HIF-1α, VEGF↑ |
| Gu et al. (2016) | Rat tibial fracture model | 20 mg/kg per day | Rg1 intraperitoneal injection | Fractured tibia | Improved H&E staining, Safranin-O/Light Green Red staining, bone mineral density, bone volume, trabecular number, trabecular separation | |
| Hu et al. (2015) | D-Galactose-induced aged rat model | 20 mg/kg per day | Rg1 intraperitoneal injection of rats and extracted BMSCs for analysis | BMSCs from aged rats | SA-β-gal+ cell%, ROS, MDA, IL-2, IL-6, TNF-α, p16INK4a, p21Cip1/Waf1, p53 pro↓; cell proliferation, S phase%, SOD activity, stem cell factor↑ |
|
| Hu et al. (2015) | Normal rats | 20 mg/kg per day | Rg1 intraperitoneal injection of rats and extracted BMSCs for analysis | BMSCs from aged rats | SA-β-gal+ cell%, G1 phase %, ROS, MDA, IL-6,p16↓; cell proliferation, TNF-α, S phase %, SOD activity↑ |
|
| Bao et al. (2015) | MCAO and reperfusion models (intraluminal vascular occlusion method) | 20 mg/kg per day | Rat BMSC venous transplantation followed by Rg1 intraperitoneal injection | Rat ipsilateral and contralateral hemispheres | Brain edema, infarct volume↓; neurological outcome↑ |
TUNEL staining, Bax pro↓; neuron-specific enolase, glial fibrillary acidic pro, Bcl-2 pro, Bcl-2/Bax↑ |
| Zheng et al. (2018) | Hind limb ischemia model | 100 μg/ml (cultured with BMSCs) | BMSCs treated with Rg1 orthotopic transplantation | Gastrocnemius and tibialis anterior muscle | Improved the survival of transplanted BMSCs and enhanced the therapeutic effects | ROCK-1, MLC-2, Bad, Bax↓; Bcl-2, miR-494-3p↑ |
| Wang et al. (2005) | Rabbit myocardial infarction model | 10 mg/(kg·d) | Rabbit BMSC iliac transplantation followed by Rg1 treatment | Rabbit heart | Area of myocardial infarction↓; cardiac function; regeneration of myocardial endothelial cells↑ |
Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in cardiac muscle↑ |
Animal experimental studies of ginsenoside Rg1 regulating MSCs in vivo.
Funding
This work was supported by the Master's Startup Fund of Zunyi Medical College (Yuan Zi [2017] No. 29) and the Traditional Chinese Medicine and Ethnic Medicine Science and Technology Research Project of Guizhou Province (QZYY-2018-113).
Statements
Author contributions
Conceptualization: FH. Methodology: FH and TL. Software: FH. Validation: FH. Formal analysis: FH and CY. Investigation: FH and HJ. Resources: FH. Data curation: FH. Writing—original draft preparation: FH. Writing—review and editing: FH and CY. Visualization: FH. Supervision: FH. Project administration: FH and TL. Funding acquisition: FH.
Acknowledgments
We thank Professor Limei Yu and Dr. Yuxiang Li for their support.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2019.01565/full#supplementary-material
References
1
Alison M. R. Poulsom R. Jeffery R. Dhillon A. P. Quaglia A. Jacob J. et al . (2000). Hepatocytes from non-hepatic adult stem cells. Nature406, 257. doi: 10.1038/35018642
2
Alt E. U. Senst C. Murthy S. N. Slakey D. P. Dupin C. L. Chaffin A. E. et al . (2012). Aging alters tissue resident mesenchymal stem cell properties. Stem Cell Res.8, 215–225. doi: 10.1016/j.scr.2011.11.002
3
Bao C. Wang Y. Min H. Zhang M. Du X. Han R. et al . (2015). Combination of ginsenoside Rg1 and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in the treatment of cerebral ischemia reperfusion injury in rats. Cell. Physiol. Biochem.37, 901–910. doi: 10.1159/000430217
4
Bonab M. M. Alimoghaddam K. Talebian F. Ghaffari S. H. Ghavamzadeh A. Nikbin B. (2006). Aging of mesenchymal stem cell in vitro. BMC Cell Biol.7, 14. doi: 10.1186/1471-2121-7-14
5
Bourin P. Bunnell B. A. Casteilla L. Dominici M. Katz A. J. March K. L. et al . (2013). Stromal cells from the adipose tissue-derived stromal vascular fraction and culture expanded adipose tissue-derived stromal/stem cells: a joint statement of the International federation for adipose therapeutics and science (IFATS) and the international society for cellular therapy (ISCT). Cytotherapy15, 641–648. doi: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2013.02.006
6
Bruder S. P. Jaiswal N. Haynesworth S. E. (1997). Growth kinetics, self-renewal, and the osteogenic potential of purified human mesenchymal stem cells during extensive subcultivation and following cryopreservation. J. Cell. Biochem.64, 278–294. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4644(199702)64:2<278::AID-JCB11>3.0.CO;2-F
7
Bruder S. P. Kurth A. A. Shea M. Hayes W. C. Jaiswal N. Kadiyala S. (1998). Bone regeneration by implantation of purified, culture-expanded human mesenchymal stem cells. J. Orthop. Res.16, 155–162. doi: 10.1002/jor.1100160202
8
Chamberlain G. Fox J. Ashton B. Middleton J. (2007). Concise review: mesenchymal stem cells: their phenotype, differentiation capacity, immunological features, and potential for homing. Stem Cells25, 2739–2749. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2007-0197
9
Chan R. Y. Chen W. F. Dong A. Guo D. Wong M. S. (2002). Estrogen-like activity of ginsenoside Rg1 derived from Panax notoginseng. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.87, 3691–3695. doi: 10.1210/jcem.87.88717
10
Crigler L. Robey R. C. Asawachaicharn A. Gaupp D. Phinney D. G. (2006). Human mesenchymal stem cell subpopulations express a variety of neuro-regulatory molecules and promote neuronal cell survival and neuritogenesis. Exp. Neurol.198, 54–64. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2005.10.029
11
Deans R. J. Moseley A. B. (2000). Mesenchymal stem cells: biology and potential clinical uses. Exp. Hematol.28, 875–884. doi: 10.1016/S0301-472X(00)00482-3
12
Debnath S. Yallowitz A. R. McCormick J. Lalani S. Zhang T. Xu R. et al . (2018). Discovery of a periosteal stem cell mediating intramembranous bone formation. Nature562, 133–139. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0554-8
13
Dong J. Zhu G. Wang T. C. Shi F. S. (2017). Ginsenoside Rg1 promotes neural differentiation of mouse adipose-derived stem cells via the miRNA-124 signaling pathway. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B18, 445–448. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B1600355
14
Ellis J. M. Reddy P. (2002). Effects of Panax ginseng on quality of life. Ann. Pharmacother.36, 375–379. doi: 10.1345/aph.1A245
15
Fang H. Limei Y. (2016). Effects of ginsenoside Rg1 on characteristics and functions of adult stem cells. Chin. Pharmacol. Bull.32, 319–322. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1978.2016.03.005
16
Fehrer C. Lepperdinger G. (2005). Mesenchymal stem cell aging. Exp. Gerontol.40, 926–930. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2005.07.006
17
Ferns G. A. Avades T. Y. (2000). The mechanisms of coronary restenosis: insights from experimental models. Int. J. Exp. Pathol.81, 63–88. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2613.2000.00143.x
18
Fu X.-K. Zheng H.-Z. (2013). The protective effect of ginsenoside Rg1 on rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell apoptosis. Chin. J. Clin.7, 3454–3459. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2013.08.105
19
Geng Y. J. (2003). Molecular mechanisms for cardiovascular stem cell apoptosis and growth in the hearts with atherosclerotic coronary disease and ischemic heart failure. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci.1010, 687–697. doi: 10.1196/annals.1299.126
20
Gu Y. Zhou J. Wang Q. Fan W. Yin G. (2016). Ginsenoside Rg1 promotes osteogenic differentiation of rBMSCs and healing of rat tibial fractures through regulation of GR-dependent BMP-2/SMAD signaling. Sci. Rep.6, 25282. doi: 10.1038/srep25282
21
Guo Y. H. Zhao S. Du Y. X. Xing Q. J. Chen B. L. Yu C. Q. (2017). Effects of ginsenoside Rg1-loaded alginate-chitosan microspheres on human bone marrow stromal cells. Biosci. Rep.37 (3), BSR20160566. doi: 10.1042/bsr20160566
22
He W. Wu W. K. Wu Y. L. Yang X. H. Lin Q. X. Yu W. H. (2011). Ginsenoside-Rg1 mediates microenvironment-dependent endothelial differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells in vitro. J. Asian Nat. Prod. Res.13, 1–11. doi: 10.1080/10286020.2010.535519
23
He F. Zhou A. Feng S. (2018a). Use of human amniotic epithelial cells in mouse models of bleomycin-induced lung fibrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PloS One13, e0197658. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197658
24
He F. Zhou A. Feng S. Li Y. Liu T. (2018b). Mesenchymal stem cell therapy for paraquat poisoning: a systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical studies. PloS One13, e0194748. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194748
25
Hoffmann R. Mintz G. S. Dussaillant G. R. Popma J. J. Pichard A. D. Satler L. F. et al . (1996). Patterns and mechanisms of in-stent restenosis. A serial intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation94, 1247–1254. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.94.61247
26
Hu W. Zuo Q. Fang Z. Qiu Z. Zhang S. (2014). Roles of ginsenoside Rg1 in the induction of mouse induced pluripotent stem cells. Neural Inj. Funct. Reconstr.9, 184–186. doi: 10.3870/sjsscj.2014.03.004
27
Hu W. Jing P. Wang L. Zhang Y. Yong J. Wang Y. (2015). The positive effects of ginsenoside Rg1 upon the hematopoietic microenvironment in a D-galactose-induced aged rat model. BMC Complement. Altern. Med.15, 119. doi: 10.1186/s12906-015-0642-3
28
Hu J. Gu Y. Fan W. (2016). Rg1 protects rat bone marrow stem cells against hydrogen peroxide-induced cell apoptosis through the PI3K/Akt pathway. Mol. Med. Rep.14, 406–412. doi: 10.3892/mmr.20165238
29
Huang S.-Y. Chen J.-Y. Wang Y.-A. Zhang J. Li Y. (2016). Protective effect of ginsenoside Rg1 against MDA-suppressed osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Life Sci. Res.20, 140–144. doi: 10.16605/j.cnki.1007-7847.2016.02.009
30
Ikada Y. (2006). Challenges in tissue engineering. J. R. Soc Interface3, 589–601. doi: 10.1098/rsif.20060124
31
Ikebe C. Suzuki K. (2014). Mesenchymal stem cells for regenerative therapy: optimization of cell preparation protocols. BioMed. Res. Int.2014, 11. doi: 10.1155/2014/951512
32
Jiang Y. Jahagirdar B. N. Reinhardt R. L. Schwartz R. E. Keene C. D. Ortiz-Gonzalez X. R. et al . (2002). Pluripotency of mesenchymal stem cells derived from adult marrow. Nature418, 41–49. doi: 10.1038/nature00870
33
Jin S. Jeon J. H. Lee S. Kang W. Y. Seong S. J. Yoon Y. R. et al . (2019). Detection of 13 ginsenosides (Rb1, Rb2, Rc, Rd, Re, Rf, Rg1, Rg3, Rh2, F1, compound K, 20(S)-protopanaxadiol, and 20(S)-protopanaxatriol) in human plasma and application of the analytical method to human pharmacokinetic studies following two week-repeated administration of red ginseng extract. Molecules24, 2618. doi: 10.3390/molecules24142618
34
Kaukua N. Shahidi M. K. Konstantinidou C. Dyachuk V. Kaucka M. Furlan A. et al . (2014). Glial origin of mesenchymal stem cells in a tooth model system. Nature513, 551–554. doi: 10.1038/nature13536
35
Kern S. Eichler H. Stoeve J. Kluter H. Bieback K. (2006). Comparative analysis of mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow, umbilical cord blood, or adipose tissue. Stem Cells24, 1294–1301. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2005-0342
36
Komori T. (2018). Runx2, an inducer of osteoblast and chondrocyte differentiation. Histochem. Cell Biol.149, 313–323. doi: 10.1007/s00418-018-1640-6
37
Kowaltowski A. J. Fiskum G. (2005). Redox mechanisms of cytoprotection by Bcl-2. Antioxid. Redox Signal.7, 508–514. doi: 10.1089/ars.2005.7.508
38
Le Blanc K. Ringden O. (2007). Immunomodulation by mesenchymal stem cells and clinical experience. J. Intern. Med.262, 509–525. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2007.01844.x
39
Le Blanc K. Rasmusson I. Sundberg B. Gotherstrom C. Hassan M. Uzunel M. et al . (2004). Treatment of severe acute graft-versus-host disease with third party haploidentical mesenchymal stem cells. Lancet363, 1439–1441. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(04)16104-7
40
Lee C. H. Kim J. H. (2014). A review on the medicinal potentials of ginseng and ginsenosides on cardiovascular diseases. J. Ginseng Res.38, 161–166. doi: 10.1016/j.jgr.2014.03.001
41
Lee Y. J. Chung E. Lee K. Y. Lee Y. H. Huh B. Lee S. K. (1997). Ginsenoside-Rg1, one of the major active molecules from Panax ginseng, is a functional ligand of glucocorticoid receptor. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol.133, 135–140. doi: 10.1016/S0303-7207(97)00160-3
42
Lee E. J. Ko E. Lee J. Rho S. Ko S. Shin M. K. et al . (2004). Ginsenoside Rg1 enhances CD4(+) T-cell activities and modulates Th1/Th2 differentiation. Int. Immunopharmacol.4, 235–244. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2003.12.007
43
Lee H. Kim J. Lee S. Y. Park J. H. Hwang G. S. (2012). Processed Panax ginseng, sun ginseng, decreases oxidative damage induced by tert-butyl hydroperoxide via regulation of antioxidant enzyme and anti-apoptotic molecules in HepG2 cells. J. Ginseng Res.36, 248–255. doi: 10.5142/jgr.2012.36.3.248
44
Leung K. W. Wong A. S. (2010). Pharmacology of ginsenosides: a literature review. Chin. Med.5, 20. doi: 10.1186/1749-8546-5-20
45
Li J.-W. Zhang M.-X. Zhou T. Torao I. Wang X.-Y. (2011). Effects of ginsenoside Rg1 on the expressions of Nanog, c-Myc, Oct, Klf4, Sox2 mRNA during the differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells into pluripotent stem cells. Chin. J. Tissue Eng. Res.15, 6032–6035. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8225.2011.32.032
46
Li Y. Wang Y. A. Pan X. Wang B. (2013). Protective effect of ginsenoside Rg1 on MDA-induced apoptosis in mesenchymal stem cells derived from murine bone marrow. Acta Laser Biol. Sin.22, 337–342. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7146.2013.04.009
47
Li Q. Reed D. A. Min L. Gopinathan G. Li S. Dangaria S. J. et al . (2014). Lyophilized platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) promotes craniofacial bone regeneration through Runx2. Int. J. Mol. Sci.15, 8509–8525. doi: 10.3390/ijms15058509
48
Liu P. Xu Y. Yin H. Wang J. Chen K. Li Y. (2005). Developmental toxicity research of ginsenoside Rb1 using a whole mouse embryo culture model. Birth Defects Res. B Dev. Reprod. Toxicol.74, 207–209. doi: 10.1002/bdrb.20038
49
Liu P. Yin H. Xu Y. Zhang Z. Chen K. Li Y. (2006). Effects of ginsenoside Rg1 on postimplantation rat and mouse embryos cultured in vitro. Toxicol. In Vitro20, 234–238. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2005.06.029
50
Liu Y. Yi L. Wang L. Chen L. Chen X. Wang Y. (2016). Ginsenoside Rg1 protects human umbilical cord blood-derived stromal cells against tert-Butyl hydroperoxide-induced apoptosis through Akt-FoxO3a-Bim signaling pathway. Mol. Cell. Biochem.421, 75–87. doi: 10.1007/s11010-016-2786-y
51
Méndez-Ferrer S. Michurina T. V. Ferraro F. Mazloom A. R. MacArthur B. D. Lira S. A. et al . (2010). Mesenchymal and haematopoietic stem cells form a unique bone marrow niche. Nature466, 829–834. doi: 10.1038/nature09262
52
Mastrolia I. Foppiani E. M. Murgia A. Candini O. Samarelli A. V. Grisendi G. et al . (2019). Concise review: challenges in clinical development of mesenchymal stromal/stem cells. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 8 (11), 1135–1148. doi: 10.1002/sctm.19-0044
53
Mohammed O. J. Latif M. L. Pratten M. K. (2016). Evaluation of embryotoxicity for major components of herbal extracts using the chick embryonic heart micromass and mouse D3 embryonic stem cell systems. Reprod. Toxicol.59, 117–127. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2015.12.003
54
Mohanan P. Subramaniyam S. Mathiyalagan R. Yang D.-C. (2018). Molecular signaling of ginsenosides Rb1, Rg1, and Rg3 and their mode of actions. J. Ginseng Res.42, 123–132. doi: 10.1016/j.jgr.2017.01.008
55
Nakatani M. Takeyama Y. Shibata M. Yorozuya M. Suzuki H. Koba S. et al . (2003). Mechanisms of restenosis after coronary intervention: difference between plain old balloon angioplasty and stenting. Cardiovasc. Pathol.12, 40–48. doi: 10.1016/S1054-8807(02)00135-7
56
Nobuyoshi M. Kimura T. Ohishi H. Horiuchi H. Nosaka H. Hamasaki N. et al . (1991). Restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: pathologic observations in 20 patients. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.17, 433–439. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(10)80111-1
57
Ong C. O. Chan L. Y. Yung P. B. Leung T. N. (2005). Use of traditional Chinese herbal medicine during pregnancy: a prospective survey. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand.84, 699–700. doi: 10.1111/j.0001-6349.2005.00659.x
58
Ossoukhova A. Owen L. Savage K. Meyer M. Ibarra A. Roller M. et al . (2015). Improved working memory performance following administration of a single dose of American ginseng (Panax quinquefolius L.) to healthy middle-age adults. Hum. Psychopharmacol.30, 108–122. doi: 10.1002/hup2463
59
Ozaki T. Yu M. Yin D. Sun D. Zhu Y. Bu Y. et al . (2018). Impact of RUNX2 on drug-resistant human pancreatic cancer cells with p53 mutations. BMC Cancer18, 309. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4217-9
60
Phinney D. G. Pittenger M. F. (2017). Concise review: MSC-derived exosomes for cell-free therapy. Stem Cells35, 851–858. doi: 10.1002/stem2575
61
Pittenger M. F. Mackay A. M. Beck S. C. Jaiswal R. K. Douglas R. Mosca J. D. et al . (1999). Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science284, 143–147. doi: 10.1126/science.284.5411.143
62
Puissant B. Barreau C. Bourin P. Clavel C. Corre J. Bousquet C. et al . (2005). Immunomodulatory effect of human adipose tissue-derived adult stem cells: comparison with bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Br. J. Haematol.129, 118–129. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2005.05409.x
63
Radad K. Gille G. Moldzio R. Saito H. Rausch W. D. (2004). Ginsenosides Rb1 and Rg1 effects on mesencephalic dopaminergic cells stressed with glutamate. Brain Res.1021, 41–53. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2004.06.030
64
Scholey A. Ossoukhova A. Owen L. Ibarra A. Pipingas A. He K. et al . (2010). Effects of American ginseng (Panax quinquefolius) on neurocognitive function: an acute, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Psychopharmacol. (Berl.)212, 345–356. doi: 10.1007/s00213-010-1964-y
65
Schwartz L. M. Osborne B. A. (1993). Programmed cell death, apoptosis and killer genes. Immunol. Today14, 582–590. doi: 10.1016/0167-5699(93)90197-s
66
Schwartz R. Murphy J. Edwards W. Camrud A. Vliestra R. Holmes D. (1990). Restenosis after balloon angioplasty. A practical proliferative model in porcine coronary arteries. Circulation82, 2190–2200. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.82.62190
67
Shin K. Guo H. Cha Y. Ban Y. H. Seo da W. Choi Y. et al . (2016). Cereboost, an American ginseng extract, improves cognitive function via up-regulation of choline acetyltransferase expression and neuroprotection. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol.78, 53–58. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2016.04.006
68
Shyh-Chang N. Ng H. H. (2017). The metabolic programming of stem cells. Genes Dev.31, 336–346. doi: 10.1101/gad.293167.116
69
Sotaniemi E. A. Haapakoski E. Rautio A. (1995). Ginseng therapy in non-insulin-dependent diabetic patients. Diabetes Care18, 1373–1375. doi: 10.2337/diacare.18.101373
70
Sun J. Zhang L. Zhang J. Ran R. Shao Y. Li J. et al . (2018). Protective effects of ginsenoside Rg1 on splenocytes and thymocytes in an aging rat model induced by d-galactose. Int. Immunopharmacol.58, 94–102. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2018.03.017
71
Takahashi K. Tanabe K. Ohnuki M. Narita M. Ichisaka T. Tomoda K. et al . (2007). Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell131, 861–872. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.11.019
72
Tang Y. L. Zhou Y. Wang Y. P. Wang J. W. Ding J. C. (2015). SIRT6/NF-kappaB signaling axis in ginsenoside Rg1-delayed hematopoietic stem/progenitor cell senescence. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol.8, 5591–5596.
73
Tian J. Shi J. Wei M. Qin R. Ni J. Zhang X. et al . (2016). The efficacy and safety of Fufangdanshen tablets (Radix Salviae miltiorrhizae formula tablets) for mild to moderate vascular dementia: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials17, 281. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1410-5
74
Tiran D. (2003). The use of herbs by pregnant and childbearing women: a risk-benefit assessment. Complement. Ther. Nurs. Midwifery9, 176–181. doi: 10.1016/s1353-6117(03)00045-3
75
Tonino P. A. De Bruyne B. Pijls N. H. Siebert U. Ikeno F. van' t Veer M. et al . (2009). Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. NEJM360, 213–224. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0807611
76
Tonna E. A. (1960). Periosteal osteoclasts, skeletal development and ageing. Nature185, 405–407. doi: 10.1038/185405a0
77
van Velthoven C. T. J. Rando T. A. (2019). Stem cell quiescence: dynamism, restraint, and cellular idling. Cell Stem Cell24, 213–225. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2019.01.001
78
von Zglinicki T. Saretzki G. Docke W. Lotze C. (1995). Mild hyperoxia shortens telomeres and inhibits proliferation of fibroblasts: a model for senescence?Exp. Cell Res.220, 186–193. doi: 10.1006/excr.19951305
79
Wagers A. J. Weissman I. L. (2004). Plasticity of adult stem cells. Cell116, 639–648. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(04)00208-9
80
Wang P. Z. Yaping W. (2012). Effect of ginsenoside Rgl and recombinant bone morphogenetic protein 2 on differentiation of human dental pulp stem cells in vitro. Laser J.33, 89–91. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-2743.2012.03.045
81
Wang N. Y. Lu C. J. Chen X. H. (2005). Study on effect of ginsenoside Rg1 in promoting myocardiac vascular endothelial cell regeneration through induction on bone marrow stem cell's migration and differentiation in rabbits of myocardial infarction. Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi25, 916–919. doi: 10.7661/CJIM.2005.10.916
82
Wang L. Wu X. Lu X.-Z. Ji P. Wang J.-H. Hou M.-H. et al . (2007). The mechanisms of ginsenosides Rg1 on the proliferation of bone marrow stromal cells. Chin. Pharmacol. Bull.23, 1480–1484. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-1978.2007.11.019
83
Wang P. Wei X. Zhou Y. Wang Y. P. Yang K. Zhang F. J. et al . (2012). Effect of ginsenoside Rg1 on proliferation and differentiation of human dental pulp cells in vitro. Aust. Dent. J.57, 157–165. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2012.01672.x
84
Wang P. Wei X. Zhang F. Yang K. Qu C. Luo H. et al . (2014). Ginsenoside Rg1 of Panax ginseng stimulates the proliferation, odontogenic/osteogenic differentiation and gene expression profiles of human dental pulp stem cells. Phytomedicine21, 177–183. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2013.08.021
85
Wang S. Zhu R. Li H. Li J. Han Q. Zhao R. C. (2019). Mesenchymal stem cells and immune disorders: from basic science to clinical transition. Front. Med.13, 138–151. doi: 10.1007/s11684-018-0627-y
86
Wei H. J. Yang H. H. Chen C. H. Lin W. W. Chen S. C. Lai P. H. et al . (2007). Gelatin microspheres encapsulated with a nonpeptide angiogenic agent, ginsenoside Rg1, for intramyocardial injection in a rat model with infarcted myocardium. J. Control Release120, 27–34. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2007.04.005
87
Wilson A. Trumpp A. (2006). Bone-marrow haematopoietic-stem-cell niches. Nat. Rev. Immunol.6, 93–106. doi: 10.1038/nri1779
88
Wu W. Yang J. Liu B. Wang X. (2011). The effect of ginsenoside Rg1 on differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells into neuron-like cells in homogenate of dementia rats. J. Apoplexy Nervous Dis.28, 204–207. doi: CNKI:SUN:ZFSJ.0.2011-03-004
89
Wu X. D. Guo T. Liu L. Wang C. Zhang K. Liu H. Q. et al . (2017). MiR-23a targets RUNX2 and suppresses ginsenoside Rg1-induced angiogenesis in endothelial cells. Oncotarget8, 58072–58085. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.19489
90
Wyllie A. H. Kerr J. F. Currie A. R. (1980). Cell death: the significance of apoptosis. Int. Rev. Cytol.68, 251–306. doi: 10.1016/S0074-7696(08)62312-8
91
Xu S. F. Yu L. M. Fan Z. H. Wu Q. Yuan Y. Wei Y. et al . (2012). Improvement of ginsenoside Rg1 on hematopoietic function in cyclophosphamide-induced myelosuppression mice. Eur. J. Pharmacol.695, 7–12. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2012.07.050
92
Xu F. T. Li H. M. Yin Q. S. Cui S. E. Liu D. L. Nan H. et al . (2014). Effect of ginsenoside Rg1 on proliferation and neural phenotype differentiation of human adipose-derived stem cells in vitro. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol.92, 467–475. doi: 10.1139/cjpp-2013-0377
93
Xu F. T. Li H. M. Zhao C. Y. Liang Z. J. Huang M. H. Li Q. et al . (2015). Characterization of chondrogenic gene expression and cartilage phenotype differentiation in human breast adipose-derived stem cells promoted by ginsenoside Rg1 in vitro. Cell. Physiol. Biochem.37, 1890–1902. doi: 10.1159/000438550
94
Xu F. T. Liang Z. J. Li H. M. Peng Q. L. Huang M. H. Li D. Q. et al . (2016). Ginsenoside Rg1 and platelet-rich fibrin enhance human breast adipose-derived stem cell function for soft tissue regeneration. Oncotarget7, 35390–35403. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget9360
95
Yin L. H. Cheng W. X. Qin Z. S. Sun K. M. Zhong M. Wang J. K. et al . (2015). Effects of ginsenoside Rg-1 on the proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of human periodontal ligament stem cells. Chin. J. Integr. Med.21, 676–681. doi: 10.1007/s11655-014-1856-9
96
Zhan S. Guo W. Shao Q. Fan X. Li Z. Cheng Y. (2014). A pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of drug-drug interaction between ginsenoside Rg1, ginsenoside Rb1 and schizandrin after intravenous administration to rats. J. Ethnopharmacol.152, 333–339. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2014.01.014
97
Zheng H. Z. Fu X. K. Shang J. L. Lu R. X. Ou Y. F. Chen C. L. (2018). Ginsenoside Rg1 protects rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells against ischemia induced apoptosis through miR-494-3p and ROCK-1. Eur. J. Pharmacol.822, 154–167. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2018.01.001
98
Zhu W. Chen J. Cong X. Hu S. Chen X. (2006). Hypoxia and serum deprivation-induced apoptosis in mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells24, 416–425. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2005-0121
99
Zhu J. Mu X. Zeng J. Xu C. Liu J. Zhang M. et al . (2014). Ginsenoside Rg1 prevents cognitive impairment and hippocampus senescence in a rat model of D-galactose-induced aging. PloS One9, e101291. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101291
100
Zuo W. Zuo J. Zhang Y. Zhang Z. Wang X. Sun J. (2007). The effect of ginsenoside Rg1 on differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells into neuron-like cells. J. Apoplexy Nervous Dis.24 (3), 282–284. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-2754.2007.03.008
Summary
Keywords
ginsenoside Rg1, mesenchymal stem cells, proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, senescence, preclinical study
Citation
He F, Yu C, Liu T and Jia H (2020) Ginsenoside Rg1 as an Effective Regulator of Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Front. Pharmacol. 10:1565. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.01565
Received
21 August 2019
Accepted
03 December 2019
Published
23 January 2020
Volume
10 - 2019
Edited by
Vincent Kam Wai, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macau
Reviewed by
Patrick Ying Kit Yue, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong; Qiang Wu, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macau
Updates
Copyright
© 2020 He, Yu, Liu and Jia.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Fang He, hfwyyx@yeah.net; Changyin Yu, ycynerve@163.com; Tao Liu, ltcells@163.com
†These authors share first authorship
This article was submitted to Ethnopharmacology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Pharmacology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.