Abstract
Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), a vascular disease characterized by abnormal vessel development in the retina, has become a primary cause of blindness in children around the world. ROP can be developed during two different phases: vessel loss and vessel proliferation. Once preterm infants with immature retinal vessel growth are exposed to high level of oxygen inside the incubator, vessel loss can occur. When infants are exposed to room air, they may experience the proliferation of vessels in the retina. Although multiple factors are reported to be involved in the pathogenesis of ROP, including vaso-endothelial growth factors (VEGFs) and hypoxia-inducible factors, the pathogenesis of ROP is not completely understood. Although laser therapy and pharmacologic agents, such as anti-VEGF agents, have been commonly used to treat ROP, the incidence of ROP is rapidly rising. Given that current therapies can be invasive and long-term effects are not fully known, the search for novel therapeutic targets with less destructive properties needs to be considered. Within the last decade, the field of noncoding RNA therapy has shown potential as next-generation therapy to treat diverse diseases. In this review, we introduce various noncoding RNAs regulating ROP and discuss their role as potential therapeutic targets in ROP.
Introduction
Retinopathy of prematurity
Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a progressive retinal vascular disease that occurs in preterm infants. It is characterized by abnormal vessel growth in the retina. The incidence of ROP has gradually increased due to the development of neonatal care and has become a leading cause of childhood blindness (Freitas et al., 2018; Filippi et al., 2022). Various factors including oxygen supplementation, low birthweight or gestational age, blood transfusion, and sepsis can be risk factors for ROP (Alajbegovic-Halimic et al., 2015). The progression of the disease can be divided into two phases (Hartnett and Penn, 2012). During phase 1, retinal vessel development is delayed due to various factors, such as hyperoxia caused by oxygen supplementation, reactive oxygen stress, or low maternal-derived factors (Graziosi et al., 2020). As a result, a peripheral avascular region may occur in preterm infants. During phase 2, when the preterm infants are returned to room air, the proliferation of retinal vessels can occur in the avascular region of the retina causing vision loss (Hartnett and Penn, 2012).
Diverse molecular factors and signaling cascades are involved in the development of ROP (Hartnett, 2015; Ryu, 2022). There is evidence of downregulation of hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha (HIF1α), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and erythropoietin during phase 1, whereas these factors are upregulated during phase 2 (Ryu, 2022). Various signaling pathways, including HIF, VEGF, Wnt, Notch-Sox, and Semaphorin, are activated in ROP (Chen et al., 2011; Lee et al., 2014; Hartnett, 2015; Yang et al., 2015; Kim et al., 2016; Ramshekar and Hartnett, 2021).
Currently, laser photocoagulation has been used as a first-line therapy to treat ROP (Shulman and Hartnett, 2018; Linghu et al., 2022). Although laser therapy is a widely used method to treat ROP, it has been shown to increase the risk of myopia and other unfavorable ocular outcomes, such as macular dragging (Mintz-Hittner et al., 2011; Geloneck et al., 2014; Stahl et al., 2019). Anti-VEGF agents are the alternative therapy to treat ROP. Several anti-VEGF drugs including bevacizumab, ranibizumab, pegaptanib, and aflibercept have been investigated in the context of ROP, but only ranibizumab has received the indication for the treatment of ROP in Europe and Japan (Lee and Shirley, 2021). Although, long-term systemic effects of VEGF inhibition on other organs have been reported, there is no consensus on the optimal dosage and timing of anti-VEGF agent administration (Sato et al., 2012; Harder et al., 2014; Han et al., 2018; Hamad et al., 2020; Seery et al., 2020). Thus, it is worthwhile to investigate novel therapeutic targets to treat ROP and reveal more detailed mechanisms regulating ROP.
Noncoding RNAs
Noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) are RNAs that do not generally translate proteins. Various types of ncRNAs are reported to play a critical role in regulating heart, vascular, and neuronal diseases (Poller et al., 2018; Jae and Dimmeler, 2020; Ryu et al., 2021; Yoon et al., 2021; Ryu et al., 2022). Compared to messenger RNA (mRNA), the function of ncRNAs has not been thoroughly investigated. In this article, we will focus on the role of three different types of ncRNAs: microRNA (miRNA), long noncoding RNA (lncRNA), and circular RNA (circRNA).
miRNAs, relatively short ncRNAs with length around 22 nucleotides, have been widely studied in diverse diseases including ocular diseases. Various miRNAs were differentially expressed in vitreous humor of patients with ocular diseases (Ragusa et al., 2013). In addition, expression of miRNAs in vitreous humor of patients with uveal melanoma was analyzed and several miRNAs such as miR-146a were significantly upregulated suggesting their potential use as diagnostic biomarkers (Ragusa et al., 2015). miRNAs are highly conserved in mammals and function as modulators during post-transcription. They can bind to mRNA and inhibit protein translation or completely break down mRNA (Esteller, 2011). Single miRNAs can target multiple mRNAs and may involve in various biological processes (Hashimoto et al., 2013).
lncRNAs, longer-length ncRNAs, are typically longer than 200 nucleotides. Although lncRNAs have 5′ capped ends and are spliced showing similar characteristics as those of mRNAs, they lack open reading frames (ORF) resulting in the absence of protein-coding potential. Compared with mRNAs, the expression of lncRNAs is relatively weak and may differ depending on the types of species, tissue, or cell (Derrien et al., 2012). Moreover, the roles of lncRNAs may differ based on their localization. lncRNAs localized in the nucleus can modulate gene expression, whereas lncRNAs localized in the cytoplasm may function as miRNA sponges (Fatica and Bozzoni, 2014).
circRNAs, circular form RNA without 5′ and 3′ ends, are variable in length and are most frequently created by back-splicing events. Previously, circRNAs were considered as byproducts of mRNA processing; however, the diverse regulatory roles of circRNAs have been reported in various diseases. The most extensively studied function of circRNAs is their possible role as miRNA sponges (Hansen et al., 2013; Lasda and Parker, 2014). Additionally, circRNAs have been reported to act as protein sequesters or are involved in translation in cases where an ORF is included within the circRNAs. circRNAs are stable because they are not readily degraded by exonuclease due to their circular structure (Ryu et al., 2021). Thus, circRNAs may be a promising approach to treat various diseases. Recently, ncRNAs have also been investigated in various retinal vascular diseases. Compared to other retinal vascular diseases, the pharmacologic treatment options for ROP are limited. Thus, in this article, we review studies of ncRNAs in ROP and discuss their potential as novel therapeutic targets for the treatment of ROP.
Noncoding RNA studies in retinopathy of prematurity
We searched Pubmed and Embase databases for ncRNAs studies in the context of ROP, using the ncRNA-relevant search terms such as miRNA, lncRNA, and circRNA, and disease-related terms, such as retinopathy of prematurity, retinopathy, preterm infants, oxygen-induced retinopathy, retinal neovascularization, vaso-proliferation, vessel loss, and vaso-obliteration. We then manually reviewed the title and abstract of the articles to verify their relevance to our topic and selected articles for review (Tables 1, 2). By analyzing ncRNA studies in the context of ROP, we found that most studies focused on phase 2 of human ROP, in which retinal neovascularization (RNV) is maximized and the anti-angiogenic function of ncRNAs was investigated. Additionally, we found that the majority of studies were conducted in oxygen-induced retinopathy (OIR) in vitro or in vivo models. In the OIR in vitro model, human retinal microvascular endothelial cells (HRMECs), human retinal endothelial cells (HRECs), or human umbilical endothelial cells (HUVECs) were commonly used. Introducing cells to hyperoxia induced vaso-obliteration, whereas exposing cells to hypoxia promoted RNV. In addition, VEGF, H2O2, or CoCl2 was applied to cells to induce ROP. In the case of OIR in vivo models, mice or rats were commonly used, and the oxygen level was altered to mimic human ROP (Figure 1). miRNAs were the most commonly studied ncRNAs in ROP. Many miRNAs were found to target angiogenesis-related genes, such as VEGF, HIF1α, and Angiopoietin-2 (Figure 2). Compared to published research on miRNAs, there are comparatively few studies of lncRNAs and circRNAs in the context of ncRNAs in ROP. Most lncRNA and circRNAs were reported to function as miRNA sponges and indirectly regulate the target of miRNA (Figure 2).
TABLE 1
| miRNA | Expression | Study phase | Effects on ROP | Study model | Key findings | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18a-5p | Up | Phase 2 | Inhibits RNV | in vivo: OIR mice | Inhibits FGF1 and HIF1α | Guan et al. (2020) |
| 34a | Down | Phase 2 | Inhibits RNV | in vitro: VEGF-treated HRMECs in vivo: OIR rats | Inhibits Notch1 | Shi et al. (2019) |
| 96 | Down | Phase 1 | Inhibits vessel loss | in vitro: hyperoxia-induced HRMECs in vivo: OIR rats, vaso-obliteration model (80% O2) ex vivo: choroid isolated from rats at vaso-obliteration phase | Regulates VEGF and Angiopoietin-2 | Desjarlais et al. (2020) |
| 145 | Up | Phase 2 | Promotes RNV | in vitro: hypoxia-treated HRMECs in vivo: OIR mice | Inhibits TMOD3 | Liu et al. (2019) |
| 150 | Down | Phase 2 | Inhibits RNV | in vitro: VEGF-induced HRMECs in vivo: miR-150 KO mice ex vivo: aortic rings and choroidal explants from miR-150 KO mice | Inhibits CXCR4, DLL4, or FZD4 | Liu et al. (2015) |
| 181a-5p | Down | Phase 2 | Inhibits RNV | in vitro: VEGF-induced HRECs in vivo: OIR mice | Inhibits Endocan | Chen et al. (2020) |
| 182-5p | Down | Phase 2 | Inhibits RNV | in vitro: hypoxia-induced HRMECs in vivo: OIR mice | Inhibits ANG and BDNF | Li et al. (2022) |
| 299 | Down | Phase 2 | Inhibits RNV | in vitro: COCl2-induced HRECs in vivo: OIR mice | Inhibits VEGF-A | Wang et al. (2022) |
microRNAs regulating ROP.
ANG, angiogenin; BDNF, brain-derived neurotrophic factor; CXCR4, C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4; DLL4, delta like ligand 4; FGF1, fibroblast growth factor 1; FZD4, frizzled class receptor 4; HIF1a, hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha; HREC, human retinal endothelial cell; HRMEC, human retinal microvascular endothelial cells; KO, knockout; miRNA, microRNA; Notch1, neurogenic locus notch homolog protein 1; OIR, oxygen-induced retinopathy; RNV, retinal neovascularization; TMOD3, tropomodulin3; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor.
TABLE 2
| lncRNA | Expression | Study phase | Effects on ROP | Study model | Key findings | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MALAT1 | Up (P12) | Phase 2 | Promotes RNV | in vivo: OIR mice | Inhibition of MALAT1 reduced RNV | Wang et al. (2020) |
| Up | Phase 2 | Promotes RNV | in vitro: hypoxia-induced HUVECs in vivo: OIR mice | Functions as miR-124-3p sponge and regulates EGR1 Inhibition of MALAT1 reduced RNV | Xia et al. (2021) | |
| MEG3 | Down (P12) | Phase 2 | Inhibits RNV | in vivo: OIR mice | Overexpression of MEG3 inhibited RNV through PI3K/AKT/VEGF signaling pathway and reduced the expression of inflammatory factors | Di et al. (2022) |
| MIAT | Not applicable | Phase 2 | Promotes RNV | in vivo: OIR mice | Inhibition of MIAT1 reduced RNV by regulating PI3K/AKT/VEGF signaling pathway | Di et al. (2021) |
| TUG1 | Up | Phase 2 | Promotes RNV | in vitro: CoCl2-treated HRECs in vivo: OIR mice | Acts as miR-299 sponge and regulates VEGF-A | Wang et al. (2022) |
| circRNA | ||||||
| circPDE4B | Down | Phase 2 | Inhibits RNV | in vitro: hypoxia-induced HRECs in vivo: OIR mice | Acts as miR-181c sponge and regulates VHL | Deng et al. (2020) |
| circZNF609 | Up (P17) | Phase 2 | Promotes RNV | in vitro: H2O2 or CoCl2-treated HUVECs in vivo: OIR mice | Functions as miR-615-5p sponge and modulates MEF2A Inhibition of circZNF609 reduced vessel loss and pathological RNV | Liu et al. (2017) |
| OIR retinal circRNAs | Up/down | Phase 2 | Not applicable | in vivo: OIR mice | May work as ceRNAs in ROP | Zhou et al. (2019) |
long noncoding RNAs and circular RNAs regulating retinopathy of prematurity (ROP).
AKT, protein kinase B; ceRNA, competing endogenous RNA; circRNA, circular RNA; EGR1, early growth reponse 1; HREC, human retinal endothelial cell; HUVEC, human umbilical endothelial cells; lncRNA, long noncoding RNA; MALAT1, metastasis-associated lung adenocarcinoma transcript 1; MEF2A, myocyte Enhancer Factor 2A; MEG3, maternally expressed gene 3; MIAT, myocardial infarction-associated transcript; OIR, oxygen-induced retinopathy; PI3K, phosphoinositide 3-kinase; RNV, retinal neovascularization; ROP, retinopathy of prematurity; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; VHL, von Hippel-Lindau.
FIGURE 1
FIGURE 2
MicroRNAs regulating retinopathy of prematurity
Various miRNAs have been investigated for their effects on ROP (Table 1). The role of miR-18a-5p was studied in both in vivo and in vitro OIR model (Guan et al., 2020). miR-18a-5p was found to be upregulated in the OIR retina. Invitreal administration of the miR-18a-5p mimic, agomiR-18a-5p, significantly reduced the neovascular area in OIR mice retina. Similarly, agomiR-18a-5p-treated HRMECs showed reduced proliferation, migration, and tube formation. In addition, direct targets of miR-18a-5p, fibroblast growth factor 1 (FGF1) and HIF1α, were found. The mRNA expressions of FGF1 and HIF1α were significantly reduced after agomiR-18a-5p treatment in HRMECs. This study revealed that miR-18a-5p regulates pathological angiogenesis by targeting HIF1α and FGF1 in the OIR model.
The effect of miR-34a on retinal angiogenesis was studied in OIR in vitro and in vivo model (Shi et al., 2019). Previously, miR-34a was reported to inhibit tumor angiogenesis in endothelial cells, and the neurogenic locus notch homolog protein 1 (Notch1) pathway has been reported to play an important role in vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-treated angiogenesis (Liu et al., 2003; Kumar et al., 2012). Therefore, the potential relationship of miR-34a and Notch1 in retinal angiogenesis was also investigated. miR-34a was downregulated, whereas Notch1 was upregulated in the in vivo OIR rat models. Similarly, administration of miR-34a mimic significantly reduced the expression of Notch1 in VEGF-induced HRMECs. Additionally, silencing of Notch1 significantly suppressed proliferation, migration, and tube formation in VEGF-induced HRMECs. Thus, it was shown that miR-34a reduces retinal neovascularization through inhibition of Notch1.
The role of miR-96 was investigated by Desjarlais et al. (2022). Expression of miR-96 was found to be downregulated in OIR rats and hyperoxia-induced HRMECs. Moreover, miR-96 mimics upregulated pro-angiogenic factors, such as VEGF, Angiopoietin-2, and FGF2, whereas antagomiR-96 inhibited these factors. Additionally, intravitreal injection of miR-96 mimic before hyperoxia significantly suppressed the vessel loss, which suggests that miR-96 has vaso-protective properties.
miR-145 was found to play a significant role in the regulation of endothelial cells during pathological angiogenesis (Liu et al., 2019). The investigators revealed that miR-145 directly targets tropomodulin3 (TMOD3), an actin-capping protein. The expression of miR-145 was upregulated, whereas the expression of TMOD3 was downregulated in the retinas of the OIR mice model and hypoxia-treated HRMECs. The function of miR-145 was investigated in an in vitro and in vivo OIR model. miR-145 inhibitor reduced RNV, whereas miR-145 mimic promoted retinal angiogenesis in HRMECs. Administration of miR-145 mimic reduced expression of TMOD3 and altered the structure of actin and endothelial cells. Additionally, either miR-145 inhibitor or miR-145 inhibitor along with small interfering RNA (siRNA) of TMOD3 was administered intravitreally in the eyes of OIR mice. Compared to the control group, the mice group injected with miR-145 inhibitor showed a significant reduction in neovascular area. However, when TMOD3 was suppressed along with miR-145, the neovascular region increased significantly. These results demonstrated that miR-145 regulates TMOD3 and revealed the role of the miR-145/TMOD3 axis in pathological RNV of the OIR model.
miR-150 was reported to involve in the pathological RNV (Liu et al., 2015). The authors found that expression of miR-150 was reduced in the retinal vessels of OIR mice. miR-150 mimic significantly inhibited proliferation, migration, and tube formation in HRMECs and the neovascular region in an OIR in vivo model. Targets of miR-150, C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4 (CXCR4), delta-like ligand 4 (DLL4), and frizzled class receptor 4 (FZD4) were identified by using the seed region sequence of miR-150. The miR-150 mimics were shown to inhibit the expression of CXCR4, DLL4, and FZD4 in HRMECs. Moreover, compared to the control, significant enlargement of the sprouting area of the aortic ring and choroid was detected in ex vivo experiments of miR-150 knockout mice. This study revealed the anti-angiogenic role of miR-150 in retinal neovascularization and downstream target genes of miR-150.
The role of miR-181a-5p in RNV was investigated in an OIR model (Chen et al., 2020). Previously, endocan was found to regulate the expression of proangiogenic factors, such as VEGF-A and VEGF-C, and be involved in cell activation and angiogenesis of endothelial cells. Endocan was upregulated in an in vivo experiment using OIR mouse model retinas. Suppression of endocan reduced survival, proliferation and tube formation in VEGF-treated HRECs and the neovascular area in OIR mice retinas. Additionally, the target of endocan, miR-181a-5p, was predicted using bioinformatics analysis and verified through the use of a luciferase assay. miR-181a-5p mimic inhibited proliferation, tube formation, survival in VEGF-treated HRECs. Moreover, overexpression of miR-181a-5p reduced the neovascular area in OIR mice retinas. Although the authors found the anti-angiogenic function of miR-181a-5p and miR-181a-5p/endocan regulatory axis, the effects of miR-181a-5p on other angiogenic pathways remain to be discovered in further research.
In a study by Li et al. (2022) the target of angiogenin (ANG) and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) was revealed to be miR-182-5p. ANG was shown to be a pro-angiogenic factor that accelerates cell growth and endothelial tube formation (Miyake et al., 2015). Additionally, BDNF was found to promote migration and angiogenesis in endothelial cells (Matsuda et al., 2012). Through bioinformatics, the authors predicted that miR-182-5p was a potential target of ANG and BDNF. The expression level of miR-182-5p was downregulated, whereas the expressions of ANG and BDNF mRNA were upregulated in the retinas of OIR mice and hypoxia-induced HRMECs. In addition, when miR-182-5p mimic was introduced, the expression of ANG and BDNF was reduced in hypoxia-induced HRMECs. Compared to the scramble group, the miR-182-5p mimic group showed decreased cell migration and increased cell viability and tube formation in hypoxia-induced HRMECs (Li et al., 2022). Thus, the authors discovered that miR-182-5p, ANG, and BDNF can be potential targets to treat RNV.
Long noncoding RNAs regulating retinopathy of prematurity
Several lncRNAs have been investigated in terms of their role in ROP (Table 2). The pro-angiogenic role of lncRNA metastasis-associated lung adenocarcinoma transcript 1 (MALAT1) was revealed in two studies (Wang et al., 2020; Xia et al., 2021). Wang et al. reported that lncRNA MALAT1 expression was upregulated in OIR mice. Compared to the control, inhibition of MALAT1 reduced RNV and suppressed CCN1/Akt/VEGF pathway and inflammatory cytokines, including IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α, during hyperoxia (Wang et al., 2020). These results suggest that the inhibition of lncRNA MALAT1 may reduce the progression of ROP. In addition, Xia et al. revealed that lncRNA MALAT1 can act as an miR-124-3p sponge and modulate early growth response 1 (EGR1) (Xia et al., 2021). The expression levels of miRNAs, lncRNAs, and mRNAs in an OIR mice model were evaluated in the microarray. miR-124-3p, a significantly downregulated miRNA in microarray, was selected for further study. As shown in the microarray, expression of miR-124-3p expression was significantly reduced in a hypoxia-induced in vitro model. The addition of miR-124-3p inhibited proliferation and migration, whereas suppression of miR-124-3p promoted proliferation and migration of hypoxia-treated HUVECs. Through bioinformatics analysis, the interacting partners of miR-124-3p, lncRNA MALAT1, and EGR1 were predicted. The expression of EGR1 and lncRNA MALAT1 was upregulated in hypoxia-treated HUVECs and retinas of OIR mice. Overexpression of miR-124-3p or inhibition of MALAT1 also suppressed EGR1 in hypoxia-induced HUVECs. Thus, the results of the study revealed the novel regulatory axis of lncRNA MALAT1/miR-124-3p/EGR1 in OIR in vitro and in vivo models.
The role of the maternally expressed gene 3 (MEG3) in ROP was revealed by Di et al. (2022). Intravitreal injection of MEG3 overexpressing lentivirus reduced retinal angiogenesis via VEGF/phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (Akt) signaling pathway and suppressed inflammatory markers, such as IL-1β and IL-6 in OIR mice. Additionally, this research group also investigated the effect of lncRNA myocardial infarction-associated transcript (MIAT) in the OIR mice model (Di et al., 2021). The investigators found that silencing lncRNA MIAT by administering intravitreal injection suppressed retinal angiogenesis through downregulation of the VEGF/PI3K/Akt pathway. Thus, lncRNA MEG3 or MIAT may be a promising therapeutic target to treat ROP.
Lastly, Wang et al. explored the function of lncRNA TUG1 in retinal angiogenesis (Wang et al., 2022). Previously, lncRNA TUG1 was studied in various cancer; however, its role in retinal angiogenesis was not investigated. The authors found that the expression of TUG1 was upregulated in the retinas of OIR mice, whereas the expression of miR-299-3p was downregulated. They showed that knockdown of lncRNA TUG1 reduced RNV, apoptosis, inflammation, and the level of angiogenesis markers such as VEGF-A in OIR mice retinas. Moreover, lncRNA TUG1 was found to act as a miR-299-3p sponge and modulate VEGF-A. Overexpression of miR-299 inhibited VEGF and TUG1 and reduced tube formation, migration, and apoptosis in CoCl2-treated HRECs.
Circular RNAs regulating retinopathy of prematurity
There are a few studies in which the role of circRNA in ROP has been investigated (Table 2) (Liu et al., 2017; Zhou et al., 2019; Deng et al., 2020). Deng et al. reported that the expression of circPDE4B was decreased in hypoxia-treated HRECs and retinas of OIR mice (Deng et al., 2020). Overexpression of circPDE4B inhibited the expression of angiogenic factors, such as HIF1α and VEGF-A, cell proliferation, and vascular tube formation in vitro. Moreover, the authors found that circPDE4B works as a miR-181c sponge and modulates von Hippel-Lindau (VHL). This study revealed the anti-angiogenic function of circPDE4B and found that circPDE4B/miR-181c/VHL regulatory axis regulates ROP.
Liu et al. investigated the function of circZNF609 (Liu et al., 2017). The expression of circZNF609 was upregulated during hypoxia. Inhibition of circZNF609 promoted cell viability, migration, and tube formation and suppressed RNV in OIR mice model. Using bioinformatics databases, the investigators predicted miR-615-5p would interact with circZNF609. CircZNF609 was verified to act as a miR-615-5p sponge in H2O2-treated HUVECs. Subsequently, the downstream target of miR-615-5p, Myocyte Enhancer Factor 2A (MEF2A), was predicted using a bioinformatic database. Overexpression of MEF2A reduced cell migration and tube formation promoted by inhibition of circZNF609. Therefore, circZNF609/miR-615-5p/MEF2A axis was revealed to regulate vascular endothelial cell function.
CircRNA profiles of retinas from OIR and normal mice were analyzed by Zhou et al., 2019. They revealed differentially expressed circRNA, miRNA, and mRNA in the OIR mice model. Based on gene ontology analysis, angiogenesis was found to be one of the more prevalent biological processes. The potential of circRNA acting as competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) was predicted using a bioinformatics database, miRanda. The levels of expression of selected circRNA, miRNA, and mRNAs were verified using RT-qPCR, suggesting that various circRNA-miRNA-mRNA regulatory axes may be involved in the progression of ROP.
Strategies to modulate ncRNAs
By overexpressing or inhibiting ncRNAs, the progression and severity of ROP can be modulated. miRNA can be overexpressed by using miRNA mimics or microRNA expression vectors. miRNA mimic, a synthetic miRNA with the identical sequence as an endogenous miRNA, can be used to upregulate expression of miRNA. Double-stranded miRNA mimic is processed to single-stranded miRNA inside RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) and subsequently inhibit target mRNA (van Rooij and Kauppinen, 2014). Several miRNA mimics have been investigated in clinical trials. For example, MRX34, the miR-34a mimic, was investigated in phase 1 clinical trials with liver cancer (Beg et al., 2017; Hong et al., 2020). miRNA expression vectors are promoter-containing vectors designed to express miRNAs of interest (Ling et al., 2013). For instance, miR-26a expression vector was used to inhibit the progression of cancer in the in vitro and in vivo hepatocellular carcinoma model (Kota et al., 2009). On the other hand, miRNAs can be suppressed by anti-miR or miRNA sponge (Ling et al., 2013). Anti-miR is an antisense oligonucleotide that inhibit target miRNAs and has a partially or fully complementary sequence to its target endogenous miRNA. Miravirsen, miR-122 anti-miR, was tested for the treatment of hepatitis C virus infection in phase 2 clinical trial (Janssen et al., 2013). miRNA sponge vectors are designed to contain multiple complementary sequence sites of single or multiple miRNAs of interest (Ebert et al., 2007; Chang, 2018). For instance, the miR-122 sponge vector reduced miR-122 in liver and effectively inhibited cholesterol level for 25 weeks in miR-122 sponge vector-injected mice (Xie et al., 2012). Furthermore, backbone or sugars of miRNA mimics or miRNA inhibitors can be modified to enhance stability (Baumann and Winkler, 2014).
LncRNAs can be overexpressed by constructing lncRNA overexpression plasmids. For instance, promoter region of lncRNAs can be combined with CRISPR activator complex to upregulate transcription of lncRNA (Dominguez et al., 2016; Lim et al., 2020). Strategies to inhibit lncRNA vary depending on localization. Nuclear lncRNAs can be suppressed by antisense oligonucleotides via degradation through RNase H. On the other hand, cytoplasmic lncRNAs can be suppressed by siRNAs via RNA interference (Lennox and Behlke, 2016). In addition, CRISPR-Cas 13 system can be used to inhibit or degrade lncRNA (Cox et al., 2017; Zhang et al., 2020). CircRNA can be upregulated using the circRNA overexpression vector through induction of backsplicing (Kramer et al., 2015). On the contrary, circRNAs can be downregulated by siRNAs, given that most circRNAs are enriched in the cytoplasm (Jeck et al., 2013).
Future perspective on ncRNA therapy
Recently, RNA therapies have received attention, and several ncRNA therapeutics are under clinical trials (Huang et al., 2020; Winkle et al., 2021). Various ncRNAs have been investigated for their uses in diagnosis and treatment. To date, miRNA therapeutics have been explored in various diseases, including hepatitis C virus infection and cancer, and have undergone clinical trials (Janssen et al., 2013; Beg et al., 2017; van der Ree et al., 2017). Currently, there are few pharmacological options for the treatment of ROP, and laser therapy can be invasive and increase the risk of myopia and other undesirable ocular outcomes; thus, it is worth finding novel therapeutic targets (Ryu, 2022). Compared to conventional therapy, ncRNA therapy can be effective against targets that have been unresponsive to the currently available drugs and the stability of RNA therapy can be enhanced by using carriers, such as liposomes (Ozpolat et al., 2014; Damase et al., 2021). Additionally, RNA therapy does not cause gene alteration. Because ROP occurs in preterm infants, the incidence is low compared to other retinal diseases such as diabetic retinopathy, it may not be a promising research and development target for pharmaceutical companies. Thus, RNA therapy is a reasonable treatment option in ROP, especially given that it is less expensive to develop than conventional therapy.
Conclusion
Although laser therapy and anti-VEGF agents have been used to treat ROP, the ROP incidence has increased and current therapies pose risks due to invasive methods and lack of data on long-term safety issues and dosage. Recently, RNA therapy has been extensively investigated in diverse diseases and has shown potential as a novel therapy. Among the different types of RNAs, ncRNAs have been investigated as emerging therapeutics in many diseases. In this article, we discussed the role of ncRNAs, including miRNAs, lncRNAs, and circRNAs, that have been investigated in the context of ROP. Because ROP can be regulated through overexpression or inhibition of ncRNAs, modulation of ncRNA can be a novel therapeutic approach to treat ROP.
Statements
Author contributions
HK and JK. collected the available literature. HK, JK, and JR. analyzed and interpreted the literature. HK, JK, and JR. wrote the first draft. JR revised the manuscript. JR acquired funding.
Funding
This research was supported by funding from the Basic Science Research Program of the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) by the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning (NRF-2021R1C1C2009289 and 2020R1A5A2017323). The funder had no role in study design, data collection, analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Acknowledgments
Figures 1 and 2 were created with biorender.com.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
Alajbegovic-HalimicJ.ZvizdicD.Alimanovic-HalilovicE.DodikI.DuvnjakS. (2015). Risk factors for retinopathy of prematurity in premature born children. Med. Arch.69, 409–413. 10.5455/medarh.2015.69.409-413
2
BaumannV.WinklerJ. (2014). miRNA-based therapies: strategies and delivery platforms for oligonucleotide and non-oligonucleotide agents. Future Med. Chem.6, 1967–1984. 10.4155/fmc.14.116
3
BegM. S.BrennerA. J.SachdevJ.BoradM.KangY. K.StoudemireJ.et al (2017). Phase I study of MRX34, a liposomal miR-34a mimic, administered twice weekly in patients with advanced solid tumors. Investig. New Drugs35, 180–188. 10.1007/s10637-016-0407-y
4
ChangS. (2018). Construction of multi-potent MicroRNA sponge and its functional evaluation. Methods Mol. Biol.1699, 201–209. 10.1007/978-1-4939-7435-1_15
5
ChenJ.StahlA.KrahN. M.SeawardM. R.DennisonR. J.SapiehaP.et al (2011). Wnt signaling mediates pathological vascular growth in proliferative retinopathy. Circulation124, 1871–1881. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.040337
6
ChenX.YaoY.YuanF.XieB. (2020). Overexpression of miR-181a-5p inhibits retinal neovascularization through endocan and the ERK1/2 signaling pathway. J. Cell. Physiol.235, 9323–9335. 10.1002/jcp.29733
7
CoxD. B. T.GootenbergJ. S.AbudayyehO. O.FranklinB.KellnerM. J.JoungJ.et al (2017). RNA editing with CRISPR-Cas13. Science358, 1019–1027. 10.1126/science.aaq0180
8
DamaseT. R.SukhovershinR.BoadaC.TaraballiF.PettigrewR. I.CookeJ. P. (2021). The limitless future of RNA therapeutics. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.9, 628137. 10.3389/fbioe.2021.628137
9
DengY.LiS.LiS.YuC.HuangD.ChenH.et al (2020). CircPDE4B inhibits retinal pathological angiogenesis via promoting degradation of HIF-1α though targeting miR-181c. IUBMB Life72, 1920–1929. 10.1002/iub.2307
10
DerrienT.JohnsonR.BussottiG.TanzerA.DjebaliS.TilgnerH.et al (2012). The GENCODE v7 catalog of human long noncoding RNAs: Analysis of their gene structure, evolution, and expression. Genome Res.22, 1775–1789. 10.1101/gr.132159.111
11
DesjarlaisM.WirthM.RiveraJ. C.LahaieI.DabouzR.OmriS.et al (2020). MicroRNA-96 promotes vascular repair in oxygen-induced retinopathy-A novel uncovered vasoprotective function. Front. Pharmacol.11, 13. 10.3389/fphar.2020.00013
12
DiY.WangY.WangX.NieQ. Z. (2021). Effects of long non-coding RNA myocardial infarction-associated transcript on retinal neovascularization in a newborn mouse model of oxygen-induced retinopathy. Neural Regen. Res.16, 1877–1881. 10.4103/1673-5374.306098
13
DiY.WangY.WangY. X.WangX.MaY.NieQ. Z. (2022). Maternally expressed gene 3 regulates retinal neovascularization in retinopathy of prematurity. Neural Regen. Res.17, 1364–1368. 10.4103/1673-5374.327358
14
DominguezA. A.LimW. A.QiL. S. (2016). Beyond editing: Repurposing CRISPR-cas9 for precision genome regulation and interrogation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol.17, 5–15. 10.1038/nrm.2015.2
15
EbertM. S.NeilsonJ. R.SharpP. A. (2007). MicroRNA sponges: Competitive inhibitors of small RNAs in mammalian cells. Nat. Methods4, 721–726. 10.1038/nmeth1079
16
EstellerM. (2011). Non-coding RNAs in human disease. Nat. Rev. Genet.12, 861–874. 10.1038/nrg3074
17
FaticaA.BozzoniI. (2014). Long non-coding RNAs: New players in cell differentiation and development. Nat. Rev. Genet.15, 7–21. 10.1038/nrg3606
18
FilippiL.CammalleriM.AmatoR.CiantelliM.PiniA.BagnoliP.et al (2022). Decoupling oxygen tension from retinal vascularization as a new perspective for management of retinopathy of prematurity. New opportunities from β-adrenoceptors. Front. Pharmacol.13, 835771. 10.3389/fphar.2022.835771
19
FreitasA. M.MörschbächerR.ThorellM. R.RhodenE. L. (2018). Incidence and risk factors for retinopathy of prematurity: A retrospective cohort study. Int. J. Retina Vitr.4, 20. 10.1186/s40942-018-0125-z
20
GeloneckM. M.ChuangA. Z.ClarkW. L.HuntM. G.NormanA. A.PackwoodE. A.et al (2014). Refractive outcomes following bevacizumab monotherapy compared with conventional laser treatment: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Ophthalmol.132, 1327–1333. 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.2772
21
GraziosiA.PerrottaM.RussoD.GasparroniG.D'egidioC.MarinelliB.et al (2020). Oxidative stress markers and the retinopathy of prematurity. J. Clin. Med.9, E2711. 10.3390/jcm9092711
22
GuanJ. T.LiX. X.PengD. W.ZhangW. M.QuJ.LuF.et al (2020). MicroRNA-18a-5p administration suppresses retinal neovascularization by targeting FGF1 and HIF1A. Front. Pharmacol.11, 276. 10.3389/fphar.2020.00276
23
HamadA. E.MoinuddinO.BlairM. P.SchechetS. A.ShapiroM. J.QuiramP. A.et al (2020). Late-onset retinal findings and complications in untreated retinopathy of prematurity. Ophthalmol. Retina4, 602–612. 10.1016/j.oret.2019.12.015
24
HanJ.KimS. E.LeeS. C.LeeC. S. (2018). Low dose versus conventional dose of intravitreal bevacizumab injection for retinopathy of prematurity: A case series with paired-eye comparison. Acta Ophthalmol.96, e475–e478. 10.1111/aos.13004
25
HansenT. B.JensenT. I.ClausenB. H.BramsenJ. B.FinsenB.DamgaardC. K.et al (2013). Natural RNA circles function as efficient microRNA sponges. Nature495, 384–388. 10.1038/nature11993
26
HarderB. C.Von BaltzS.JonasJ. B.SchlichtenbredeF. C. (2014). Intravitreal low-dosage bevacizumab for retinopathy of prematurity. Acta Ophthalmol.92, 577–581. 10.1111/aos.12266
27
HartnettM. E. (2015). Pathophysiology and mechanisms of severe retinopathy of prematurity. Ophthalmology122, 200–210. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.07.050
28
HartnettM. E.PennJ. S. (2012). Mechanisms and management of retinopathy of prematurity. N. Engl. J. Med.367, 2515–2526. 10.1056/NEJMra1208129
29
HashimotoY.AkiyamaY.YuasaY. (2013). Multiple-to-multiple relationships between microRNAs and target genes in gastric cancer. PLoS One8, e62589. 10.1371/journal.pone.0062589
30
HongD. S.KangY. K.BoradM.SachdevJ.EjadiS.LimH. Y.et al (2020). Phase 1 study of MRX34, a liposomal miR-34a mimic, in patients with advanced solid tumours. Br. J. Cancer122, 1630–1637. 10.1038/s41416-020-0802-1
31
HuangC. K.Kafert-KastingS.ThumT. (2020). Preclinical and clinical development of noncoding RNA therapeutics for cardiovascular disease. Circ. Res.126, 663–678. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.119.315856
32
JaeN.DimmelerS. (2020). Noncoding RNAs in vascular diseases. Circ. Res.126, 1127–1145. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.119.315938
33
JanssenH. L.ReesinkH. W.LawitzE. J.ZeuzemS.Rodriguez-TorresM.PatelK.et al (2013). Treatment of HCV infection by targeting microRNA. N. Engl. J. Med.368, 1685–1694. 10.1056/NEJMoa1209026
34
JeckW. R.SorrentinoJ. A.WangK.SlevinM. K.BurdC. E.LiuJ.et al (2013). Circular RNAs are abundant, conserved, and associated with ALU repeats. Rna19, 141–157. 10.1261/rna.035667.112
35
KimK.KimI. K.YangJ. M.LeeE.KohB. I.SongS.et al (2016). SoxF transcription factors are positive feedback regulators of VEGF signaling. Circ. Res.119, 839–852. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.308483
36
KotaJ.ChivukulaR. R.O'donnellK. A.WentzelE. A.MontgomeryC. L.HwangH. W.et al (2009). Therapeutic microRNA delivery suppresses tumorigenesis in a murine liver cancer model. Cell.137, 1005–1017. 10.1016/j.cell.2009.04.021
37
KramerM. C.LiangD.TatomerD. C.GoldB.MarchZ. M.CherryS.et al (2015). Combinatorial control of Drosophila circular RNA expression by intronic repeats, hnRNPs, and SR proteins. Genes. Dev.29, 2168–2182. 10.1101/gad.270421.115
38
KumarB.YadavA.LangJ.TeknosT. N.KumarP. (2012). Dysregulation of microRNA-34a expression in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma promotes tumor growth and tumor angiogenesis. PLoS One7, e37601. 10.1371/journal.pone.0037601
39
LasdaE.ParkerR. (2014). Circular RNAs: Diversity of form and function. Rna20, 1829–1842. 10.1261/rna.047126.114
40
LeeA.ShirleyM. (2021). Ranibizumab: A review in retinopathy of prematurity. Paediatr. Drugs23, 111–117. 10.1007/s40272-020-00433-z
41
LeeS. H.LeeS.YangH.SongS.KimK.SaundersT. L.et al (2014). Notch pathway targets proangiogenic regulator Sox17 to restrict angiogenesis. Circ. Res.115, 215–226. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.303142
42
LennoxK. A.BehlkeM. A. (2016). Cellular localization of long non-coding RNAs affects silencing by RNAi more than by antisense oligonucleotides. Nucleic Acids Res.44, 863–877. 10.1093/nar/gkv1206
43
LiC.LieH.SunW. (2022). Inhibitory effect of miR1825p on retinal neovascularization by targeting angiogenin and BDNF. Mol. Med. Rep.25, 61. 10.3892/mmr.2021.12577
44
LimY. H.RyuJ.KookH.KimY. K. (2020). Identification of long noncoding RNAs involved in differentiation and survival of vascular smooth muscle cells. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids22, 209–221. 10.1016/j.omtn.2020.08.032
45
LingH.FabbriM.CalinG. A. (2013). MicroRNAs and other non-coding RNAs as targets for anticancer drug development. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov.12, 847–865. 10.1038/nrd4140
46
LinghuD.ChengY.ZhuX.DengX.YinH.JiangY.et al (2022). Comparison of intravitreal anti-VEGF agents with laser photocoagulation for retinopathy of prematurity of 1, 627 eyes in China. Front. Med.9, 911095. 10.3389/fmed.2022.911095
47
LiuC. H.SunY.LiJ.GongY.TianK. T.EvansL. P.et al (2015). Endothelial microRNA-150 is an intrinsic suppressor of pathologic ocular neovascularization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.112, 12163–12168. 10.1073/pnas.1508426112
48
LiuC. H.WangZ.HuangS.SunY.ChenJ. (2019). MicroRNA-145 regulates pathological retinal angiogenesis by suppression of TMOD3. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids16, 335–347. 10.1016/j.omtn.2019.03.001
49
LiuC.YaoM. D.LiC. P.ShanK.YangH.WangJ. J.et al (2017). Silencing of circular RNA-znf609 ameliorates vascular endothelial dysfunction. Theranostics7, 2863–2877. 10.7150/thno.19353
50
LiuZ. J.ShirakawaT.LiY.SomaA.OkaM.DottoG. P.et al (2003). Regulation of Notch1 and dll4 by vascular endothelial growth factor in arterial endothelial cells: Implications for modulating arteriogenesis and angiogenesis. Mol. Cell. Biol.23, 14–25. 10.1128/mcb.23.1.14-25.2003
51
MatsudaS.FujitaT.KajiyaM.TakedaK.ShibaH.KawaguchiH.et al (2012). Brain-derived neurotrophic factor induces migration of endothelial cells through a TrkB-ERK-integrin αVβ3-FAK cascade. J. Cell. Physiol.227, 2123–2129. 10.1002/jcp.22942
52
Mintz-HittnerH. A.KennedyK. A.ChuangA. Z. (2011). Efficacy of intravitreal bevacizumab for stage 3+ retinopathy of prematurity. N. Engl. J. Med.364, 603–615. 10.1056/NEJMoa1007374
53
MiyakeM.GoodisonS.LawtonA.Gomes-GiacoiaE.RosserC. J. (2015). Angiogenin promotes tumoral growth and angiogenesis by regulating matrix metallopeptidase-2 expression via the ERK1/2 pathway. Oncogene34, 890–901. 10.1038/onc.2014.2
54
OzpolatB.SoodA. K.Lopez-BeresteinG. (2014). Liposomal siRNA nanocarriers for cancer therapy. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.66, 110–116. 10.1016/j.addr.2013.12.008
55
PollerW.DimmelerS.HeymansS.ZellerT.HaasJ.KarakasM.et al (2018). Non-coding RNAs in cardiovascular diseases: Diagnostic and therapeutic perspectives. Eur. Heart J.39, 2704–2716. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx165
56
RagusaM.BarbagalloC.StatelloL.CaltabianoR.RussoA.PuzzoL.et al (2015). miRNA profiling in vitreous humor, vitreal exosomes and serum from uveal melanoma patients: Pathological and diagnostic implications. Cancer Biol. Ther.16, 1387–1396. 10.1080/15384047.2015.1046021
57
RagusaM.CaltabianoR.RussoA.PuzzoL.AvitabileT.LongoA.et al (2013). MicroRNAs in vitreus humor from patients with ocular diseases. Mol. Vis.19, 430
58
RamshekarA.HartnettM. E. (2021). Vascular endothelial growth factor signaling in models of oxygen-induced retinopathy: Insights into mechanisms of pathology in retinopathy of prematurity. Front. Pediatr.9, 796143. 10.3389/fped.2021.796143
59
RyuJ.AhnY.KookH.KimY. K. (2021). The roles of non-coding RNAs in vascular calcification and opportunities as therapeutic targets. Pharmacol. Ther.218, 107675. 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2020.107675
60
RyuJ.ChoeN.KwonD. H.ShinS.LimY. H.YoonG.et al (2022). Circular RNA circSmoc1-2 regulates vascular calcification by acting as a miR-874-3p sponge in vascular smooth muscle cells. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids27, 645–655. 10.1016/j.omtn.2021.12.031
61
RyuJ. (2022). New aspects on the treatment of retinopathy of prematurity: Currently available therapies and emerging novel therapeutics. Int. J. Mol. Sci.23, 8529. 10.3390/ijms23158529
62
SatoT.WadaK.ArahoriH.KunoN.ImotoK.Iwahashi-ShimaC.et al (2012). Serum concentrations of bevacizumab (avastin) and vascular endothelial growth factor in infants with retinopathy of prematurity. Am. J. Ophthalmol.153, 327–333. e321. 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.07.005
63
SeeryC. W.BeteshS.GuoS.ZarbinM. A.BhagatN.WagnerR. S. (2020). Update on the use of anti-VEGF drugs in the treatment of retinopathy of prematurity. J. Pediatr. Ophthalmol. Strabismus57, 351–362. 10.3928/01913913-20200824-02
64
ShiS.JinY.SongH.ChenX. (2019). MicroRNA-34a attenuates VEGF-mediated retinal angiogenesis via targeting Notch1. Biochem. Cell. Biol.97, 423–430. 10.1139/bcb-2018-0304
65
ShulmanJ. P.HartnettM. E. (2018). Pharmacotherapy and ROP: Going back to the basics. Asia. Pac. J. Ophthalmol.7, 130–135. 10.22608/APO.201853
66
StahlA.LeporeD.FielderA.FleckB.ReynoldsJ. D.ChiangM. F.et al (2019). Ranibizumab versus laser therapy for the treatment of very low birthweight infants with retinopathy of prematurity (RAINBOW): An open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet394, 1551–1559. 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31344-3
67
Van Der ReeM. H.De VreeJ. M.StelmaF.WillemseS.Van Der ValkM.RietdijkS.et al (2017). Safety, tolerability, and antiviral effect of RG-101 in patients with chronic hepatitis C: A phase 1B, double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet389, 709–717. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31715-9
68
Van RooijE.KauppinenS. (2014). Development of microRNA therapeutics is coming of age. EMBO Mol. Med.6, 851–864. 10.15252/emmm.201100899
69
WangY.WangX.WangY. X.MaY.DiY. (2020). Effect and mechanism of the long noncoding RNA MALAT1 on retinal neovascularization in retinopathy of prematurity. Life Sci.260, 118299. 10.1016/j.lfs.2020.118299
70
WangY.WangX.WangY. X.MaY.DiY. (2022). The long-noncoding RNA TUG1 regulates oxygen-induced retinal neovascularization in mice via MiR-299. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.63, 37. 10.1167/iovs.63.1.37
71
WinkleM.El-DalyS. M.FabbriM.CalinG. A. (2021). Noncoding RNA therapeutics - challenges and potential solutions. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov.20, 629–651. 10.1038/s41573-021-00219-z
72
XiaF.XuY.ZhangX.LyuJ.ZhaoP. (2021). Competing endogenous RNA network associated with oxygen-induced retinopathy: Expression of the network and identification of the MALAT1/miR-124-3p/EGR1 regulatory axis. Exp. Cell. Res.408, 112783. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2021.112783
73
XieJ.AmeresS. L.FriedlineR.HungJ. H.ZhangY.XieQ.et al (2012). Long-term, efficient inhibition of microRNA function in mice using rAAV vectors. Nat. Methods9, 403–409. 10.1038/nmeth.1903
74
YangW. J.HuJ.UemuraA.TetzlaffF.AugustinH. G.FischerA. (2015). Semaphorin-3C signals through Neuropilin-1 and PlexinD1 receptors to inhibit pathological angiogenesis. EMBO Mol. Med.7, 1267–1284. 10.15252/emmm.201404922
75
YoonG.LimY. H.JoD.RyuJ.SongJ.KimY. K. (2021). Obesity-linked circular RNA circTshz2-2 regulates the neuronal cell cycle and spatial memory in the brain. Mol. Psychiatry26, 6350–6364. 10.1038/s41380-021-01303-x
76
ZhangZ.ChenJ.ZhuZ.ZhuZ.LiaoX.WuJ.et al (2020). CRISPR-Cas13-Mediated knockdown of lncRNA-GACAT3 inhibited cell proliferation and motility, and induced apoptosis by increasing p21, bax, and E-cadherin expression in bladder cancer. Front. Mol. Biosci.7, 627774. 10.3389/fmolb.2020.627774
77
ZhouH.SongH.WuY.LiuX.LiJ.ZhaoH.et al (2019). Oxygen-induced circRNA profiles and coregulatory networks in a retinopathy of prematurity mouse model. Exp. Ther. Med.18, 2037–2050. 10.3892/etm.2019.7819
Summary
Keywords
microRNA, long noncoding RNA, circular RNA, retinopathy of prematurity, retinal vascular disease, noncoding RNA
Citation
Kim H, Kim J and Ryu J (2022) Noncoding RNAs as a novel approach to target retinopathy of prematurity. Front. Pharmacol. 13:1033341. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.1033341
Received
31 August 2022
Accepted
11 October 2022
Published
20 October 2022
Volume
13 - 2022
Edited by
Mario Damiano Toro, Federico II University Hospital, Italy
Reviewed by
Chunzhen Zhao, Weifang Medical University, China
Weiguo Feng, Weifang Medical University, China
Updates
Copyright
© 2022 Kim, Kim and Ryu.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Juhee Ryu, juheeryu@knu.ac.kr
This article was submitted to Experimental Pharmacology and Drug Discovery, a section of the journal Frontiers in Pharmacology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.