Abstract
Background: μ-opioid receptor knockout (MOP-KO) mice display baseline hyperalgesia. We have recently identified changes in tissue volume in the periaqueductal gray matter (PAG) using magnetic resonance imaging voxel-based morphometry. Changes in the structure and connectivity of this region might account for some behavior phenotypes in MOP-KO mice, including hyperalgesia.
Methods: Adult male MOP-KO and wild-type (WT) mice were studied. Immunohistochemistry was performed to detect microglia, astrocytes, and neurons in the PAG using specific markers: ionized calcium-binding adaptor molecule 1 (Iba-1) for microglia, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) for astrocytes, and the neuronal nuclei antigen (NeuN; product of the Rbfox3 gene) for neurons, respectively. Cell counting was performed in the four parallel longitudinal columns of the PAG (dorsomedial, dorsolateral, lateral, and ventrolateral) at three different locations from bregma (−3.5, −4.0, and −4.5 mm).
Results: The quantitative analysis showed larger numbers of well-distributed Iba1-IR cells (microglia), NeuN-IR cells (neurons), and GFAP-IR areas (astrocytes) at all the anatomically distinct regions examined, namely, the dorsomedial (DM) PAG, dorsolateral (DL) PAG, lateral (L) PAG, and ventrolateral (VL) PAG, in MOP-KO mice than in control mice.
Conclusions: The cellular changes in the PAG identified in this paper may underlie aspects of the behavioral alterations produced by MOP receptor deletion, and suggest that alterations in the cellular structure of the PAG may contribute to hyperalgesic states.
Introduction
Studies in knockout (KO) mice have demonstrated that μ-opioid (MOP) receptors play crucial roles in several physiological functions, including nociception, stress responses, tolerance, reward learning, and immune function (1–5). Although these effects of MOP deletion have been generally thought to result simply from elimination of MOP signaling (6), as would be expected from elimination of opiate reinforcement in MOP-KO mice (7, 8), effects on drug reinforcement extend to abused drugs acting through diverse mechanisms [(9–11), see summary in Hall et al. (12)]. This may still just indicate a role for MOP in drug reinforcement generally, just as baseline hyperalgesia may indicate a role of MOP in basal nociception (1, 8). However, there certainly is evidence for neuroadaptations to the elimination of MOP. Most recently, we have found brain volume differences in the periaqueductal gray matter (PAG), olfactory bulb, arcuate nucleus, and several cerebellar regions using magnetic resonance imaging voxel-based morphometry (13).
Several factors are likely to be involved in the brain volume abnormalities in the PAG caused by the deletion of MOP receptors. The brains of several strains of mutant mice exhibit structural changes, that correlate with behavioral consequences of the genetic modifications (14). Since glial cells take up a large portion of neural tissue, it is likely that glial changes may account for some of these differences in tissue volume (although that does not exclude changes in the volume of the neuropil as well, which would be likely to drive changes in glial numbers or volume). Indeed, glial changes are found in altered pain states in the spinal cord, as well as marked changes in specific brain regions (15–17). Changes in some regions may involve a role of opioids in brain development, but others may involve adult plasticity. Hippocampal neurogenesis is affected by MOP deletion (18). Although opioid systems modulate neural stem cell progenitor differentiation and influence aspects of neural development, it is important to note that opioid agonists also affect neurogenesis in adult animals (19, 20), indicating that these effects are not necessarily developmental in nature. Current evidence support genetic factors affect brain functional connectivity and organization (21). MOP receptor gene alters the widespread brain functional connectome and remodels the reward/aversion circuit (22). Such connectivity remodeling may account for brain morphology alterations.
Thus, it is likely that alterations in MOP signaling may have broader effects on developmental and adult neuroplasticity, in addition to simply altering MOP activity. This might be evidenced as altered brain morphology and connectivity. In our previous study, finding increased size of the PAG in MOP-KO mice, histological analysis did not reveal apparent cellular pathological changes, based on conventional hematoxylin and eosin/Klüver-Barrera staining, although there were increased neural cell numbers (13). Consequently, the aim of the present study was to investigate the contribution of different neural cell types to the volume and cell number differences in the PAG resulting from genetic elimination of MOP receptors.
Materials and methods
Animals
All animals were treated in compliance with the “Principles of Laboratory Animal Care” (National Society for Medical Research) and the “Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals” (National Academies of Sciences). The Animal Care and Use Committee of the Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine approved this study.
Congenic homozygous male MOP-KO (N = 7) and wild-type (WT, N = 7) mice that had been backcrossed for at least 20 generations to C57BL/6J mice were used (1). All mice were housed at the Institute for Animal Experimentation, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, in a colony maintained at an ambient temperature of 22 ± 2°C, on a 12 h light:12 h dark cycle (lights on: 08:00–20:00) with food and water available ad libitum. Four to six mice were housed per cage. All mice were 12 weeks old at the time of sacrifice for immunohistochemical analysis.
Immunohistochemistry
Each mouse was anesthetized by intraperitoneal administration of a combination of medetomidine (0.3 mg/kg, Medetomin; Meiji Seika Pharma, Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and butorphanol (2 mg/kg, Betrorphal; Meiji Seika Pharma, Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). Local anesthesia, with 2% lidocaine (diluted to 0.5%, 3 mg/kg), was performed at the incision site. Animals were perfused transcardially with cold 0.1 M phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4) followed by 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M PBS for 30 min, at rate of 7 mL/min. After perfusion, the brains were removed and post-fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M PBS. After post-fixation, tissues were embedded in paraffin using a specialized automated tissue processing system (Tissue-Tek, Sakura Finetek Japan Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) at 58°C; 5-μm coronal sections were cut from the three anatomically distinct regions of the PAG (bregma: −3.5, −4.0, and −4.5 mm) for each of the brains from MOP-KO and WT mice (23). For each of the three regions, 5 serial sections (total number of sections: 15 per mouse) were collected.
Each formalin-fixed and paraffin wax-embedded tissue section was cleaned in xylene and rehydrated with decreasing concentrations of ethanol. For studying microglia, each section was subjected to a standard antigen retrieval procedure consisting of 5 min autoclaving at 120°C in antigen retrieval buffer, using pretreatment regent (Deparaffinization/Antigen Retrieval Solution, pH 9; Nichirei Bioscience, Tokyo, Japan), for ionized calcium-binding adapter molecule 1 (Iba1). The sections were cooled at 4°C for 30–45 min and incubated with the primary antibody (anti-Iba1 antibody, goat polyclonal, 1:2,000; Abcam, Tokyo, Japan) overnight at 4°C. The next day, the sections were washed three times with 0.01 M PBS (10 min per wash), and endogenous enzyme activity was blocked using 1% H2O2 for 20 min. Each section was stained using the indirect immunoperoxidase method (Histofine Simple Stain Max PO (G); Nichirei Bioscience), and a chromogen complex, 3,3′-diaminobenzidine tetrachloride (Simple Stain DAB Solution; Nichirei Bioscience) was used to visualize the targeted antigens; the sections were then counterstained with hematoxylin (Chroma, Köngen, Germany).
To label astrocytes, a similar protocol was used for polyclonal rabbit anti-glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) (1:2,000; Dako, Tokyo, Japan). Immunoreactivity was examined using the indirect immunoperoxidase method (Histofine Simple Stain Max PO (R); Nichirei Bioscience).
In order to detect neuronal nuclei (NeuN) expression in neurons, the antigen was retrieved by heating the samples in a microwave for 15 min at 100°C in 0.01 mol/L citrate buffer (pH 6.0). After the slides were washed, they were incubated with Blocking Reagent A (Nichirei Bioscience) for 1 h at room temperature. The sections were incubated with primary antibody (Anti-NeuN antibody, mouse monoclonal, 1:1,000; Millipore, CA, USA) overnight at 4°C. The next day, the sections were washed three times with 0.01 M PBS (10 min per wash) and endogenous enzyme activity was blocked using 1% H2O2 for 20 min. Each section was stained using the indirect immunoperoxidase method (Histofine Simple Stain Max PO (M); Nichirei Bioscience), and a chromogen complex, 3,3′-diaminobenzidine tetrachloride (Simple Stain DAB Solution, Nichirei Bioscience) was used to visualize the targeted antigens; the sections were then counterstained with hematoxylin, followed by incubation with Blocking Reagent B (Nichirei Bioscience).
The immunoreactivity of each antibody (GFAP, Iba1, and NeuN) for paraffin-embedded sections was confirmed using the procedures recommended in each product's data sheet.
Image analysis
The number of immunoreactive (IR) nuclei (for Iba1-IR and NeuN-IR, that show distinct cells) and the immunoreactive area (for GFAP-IR, that shows a more diffuse staining) were quantified using a light microscope equipped with a computer-based automated cell counting system (BZ-9000, KEYENCE, Tokyo, Japan) at the four columns in the PAG (dorsomedial: DM, dorsolateral: DL, lateral: L, and ventrolateral: VL) and three different locations from the bregma (−3.5, −4.0, and −4.5 mm) in 300 × 300 μm2 fields, following standard mouse brain coordinates (23). While viewing the automated cell counting system monitor, upper and lower thresholds of immunostaining gray level were set such that only Iba1-IR, GFAP-IR and NeuN-IR was accurately discriminated from the background in outlined PAG area. The boundaries of each PAG column were defined based on previously published anatomical criteria (24, 25).
Statistical analysis
A P-value of 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The Mann-Whitney U-test with post hoc Bonferroni-Dunn corrected means comparisons were used to evaluate individual group differences. Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics 2.4 (IBM, Chicago, IL, USA), GraphPad Prism Version 7.0 (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA), and SigmaPlot Version 13.0 (Systat Software, Inc., CA, USA). Data is presented as median (interquartile range), unless mentioned otherwise.
Results
The quantitative analysis showed larger numbers of well-distributed microglia (Iba1-IR), neurons (NeuN-IR) and astrocytes (GFAP-IR) at all the anatomically distinct regions examined, namely, the DMPAG, DLPAG, LPAG, and VLPAG, in MOP-KO mice than in control mice. The analysis showed that MOP-KO mice displayed greater numbers of Iba1-IR cells at −3.5 mm from bregma (WT: 3 [2–4] vs. MOP-KO: 8 [7–9], P < 0.001, n = 105), −4.0 mm from bregma (WT: 3 [2–4] vs. MOP-KO: 7 [6–8], P < 0.001, n = 105), and −4.5 mm from bregma (WT: 3 [2–4 vs. MOP-KO: 8 [7–9], P < 0.001, n = 105) in the DMPAG; −3.5 mm from bregma (WT: 3 [2–4] vs. MOP-KO: 7 [6–8], P < 0.001, n = 105), −4.0 mm from bregma (WT: 3 [2–4] vs. MOP-KO: 8 [7–9], P < 0.001, n = 105), and −4.5 mm from bregma (WT: 4 [3–5] vs. MOP-KO: 8 [7–9], P < 0.001, n = 105) in the DLPAG; −3.5 mm from bregma (WT: 2 [1–3] vs. MOP-KO: 6 [5–7], P < 0.001, n = 105), −4.0 mm from bregma (WT: 2 [1–3] vs. MOP-KO: 6 [5–7], P < 0.001, n = 105), −4.5 mm from bregma (WT: 3 [2–4] vs. MOP-KO: 7 [6–8], P < 0.001, n = 105) in the LPAG; and −4.5 mm from bregma (WT: 3 [2–4] vs. MOP-KO: 8 [7–9], P < 0.001, n = 105) in the VLPAG. These data are illustrated in Figure 1 (also see the representative photomicrographs in Figure 4).
Figure 1
MOP-KO mice displayed larger GFAP-IR area (μm2) at −3.5 mm from bregma (WT: 471.0 [455.8–486.0] vs. MOP-KO: 699.0 [685.0–711.3], P < 0.001, n = 105), −4.0 mm from bregma (WT: 548.0 [538.8–554.3] vs. MOP-KO: 854.5 [843.8–866.3], P < 0.001, n = 105), and −4.5 mm from bregma (WT: 351.0 [344.0–357.3] vs. MOP-KO: 923.0 [899.0–934.0], P < 0.001, n = 105) in the DMPAG; −3.5 mm from bregma (WT: 60.0 [58–62.0] vs. MOP-KO: 158.0 [153.0–164.3], P < 0.001, n = 105), −4.0 mm from bregma (WT: 63.0 [59.8–66.0] vs. MOP-KO: 248.5 [243.0–251.0], P < 0.001, n = 105), and −4.5 mm from bregma (WT: 51.0 [49.0–53.0] vs. MOP-KO: 350.5 [349.0–354.3], P < 0.001, n = 105) in the DLPAG; −3.5 mm from bregma (WT: 102.0 [99.0–108.3] vs. MOP-KO: 451.0 [450.0–455.0], P < 0.001, n = 105), −4.0 mm from bregma (WT: 99.0 [94.0–102.0] vs. MOP-KO: 437.0 [429.8–450.0], P < 0.001, n = 105), and −4.5 mm from bregma (WT: 131.0 [128.0–137.0] vs. MOP-KO: 609.5 [600.8–617.0], P < 0.001, n = 105) in the LPAG; and −4.5 mm from bregma (WT: 62.5 [59.8–68.0] vs. MOP-KO: 395.0 [388.8–403.0], P < 0.001, n = 105) in the VLPAG. These data are illustrated in Figure 2 (also see the representative photomicrographs in Figure 4).
Figure 2
The analysis showed that MOP-KO mice had larger numbers of NeuN-IR cells at −3.5 mm from bregma (WT: 65.0 [60.5–69.0] vs. MOP-KO: 121.0 [116.5–127.0], P < 0.001, n = 105), −4.0 mm from bregma (WT: 98.0 [91.5–102.5] vs. MOP-KO: 142.0 [130.5–147.0], P < 0.001, n = 105), and −4.5 mm from bregma (WT: 105.0 [102.0–109.0] vs. MOP-KO: 150.0 [144.0–154.5], P < 0.001, n = 105) in the DMPAG; −3.5 mm from bregma (WT: 80.0 [75.0–82.0] vs. MOP-KO: 122.0 [117.0–126.0], P < 0.001, n = 105), −4.0 mm from bregma (WT: 90.0 [86.0–97.0] vs. MOP-KO: 143.0 [138.5–149.0], P < 0.001, n = 105), and −4.5 mm from bregma (WT: 84.0 [80.0–86.0] vs. MOP-KO: 147.0 [141.5–151.0], P < 0.001, n = 105) in the DLPAG; −3.5 mm from bregma (WT: 85.0 [81.0–90.0] vs. MOP-KO: 160.0 [154.0–165.0], P < 0.001, n = 105), −4.0 mm from bregma (WT: 75.0 [72.0–79.0] vs. MOP-KO: 130.0 [128.0–136.0], P < 0.001, n = 105), and −4.5 mm from bregma (WT: 100.0 [98.0– 105.0] vs. MOP-KO: 140 [133.0–145.5], P < 0.001, n = 105) in the LPAG; and −4.5 mm (WT: 90.0 [88.0–93.0] vs. MOP-KO: 151.0 [146.0–155.0], P < 0.001, n = 105) in the VLPAG. These data are illustrated in Figure 3 (also see the representative photomicrographs in Figure 4).
Figure 3
Figure 4
Discussion
The aim of this study was to determine the contribution of changes in the numbers of different neural cell types (or area for astrocytes) to the volume changes in the PAG of MOP-KO mice. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed that enlarged brain size was accompanied by an increase in the number of microglia and neurons, and area of astrocyte immunoreactivity, in all of the anatomically distinct regions of the PAG that were examined (these included three different locations from the bregma [−3.5, −4.0, and −4.5 mm] and four different columns in the PAG [dorsomedial, dorsolateral, lateral, and ventrolateral].
Regulation of neurodevelopment by the endogenous opioid system is an important concept for the interpretation of our findings. Firstly, it is of interest to note that opioid receptor blockade increases DNA synthesis in germinal neural cells (26). Opioid antagonists exert a marked, stereospecific influence on the growth of neural tissues, depending on the duration of opioid receptor blockade (27). Continuous daily blockade of opioid receptors increases the number of cells in the cerebellum, whereas intermittent opioid receptor blockade decreases the number of these cells (26). Quantitative analysis has demonstrated that all cerebellar cell types, including granule cells, Purkinje cells, and glial cells, contribute to this cerebellar plasticity (28). Given these facts, our findings are in line with the cerebellar structural changes induced by continuous daily blockade of opioid receptor using naltrexone in postnatal rats (27).
However, the specific mechanisms by which MOP receptors regulate neural development in specific brain areas is yet to be determined, and likely to involve more than just MOP receptor density. Distribution and levels of MOP receptors in the brain do not predict those areas in which increased cell numbers are observed, such as the cerebellum and PAG, since neither of those areas contain high levels of MOP receptors (29), and many regions with high levels of MOP expression do not seem to be affected.
Our results indicate that structural abnormalities in the PAG may not relate to the anatomical locations and cellular organization of PAG circuits because increased cell numbers were observed in all cell types, in all PAG columns—there is just more of everything. Each anatomical subdivision of the PAG does have a role in distinct physiological functions that include the control and expression of pain, analgesia, fear, and anxiety (30, 31). Briefly, dorsolateral PAG stimulation evokes active coping strategies, such as fight/flight behaviors, non-opioid-mediated analgesia, hypertension, and tachycardia. The lateral PAG appears to coordinate non-opioid analgesia, active defensive behaviors, and exerts a hypertensive effect. Ventrolateral stimulation, on the other hand, evokes passive defensive behaviors, such as quiescence, opioid-mediated analgesia, hypotension, and bradycardia (25, 31, 32). Our findings do not necessarily indicate a large shift in these behavioral circuits mediated by PAG since all areas were affected, although these areas were not entirely equally affected. It will require more work to determine if these small differences affect the activity of individual PAG subregions and the behavior circuits that they influence.
A number of studies have demonstrated the importance of several brain sites in modulating nociception and/or mediating analgesic effects, including the PAG (33, 34), thalamus (35), hypothalamus, and amygdala (34). It is well-known that the endogenous descending pain modulatory circuit originates in the PAG and includes neurons in the rostral ventromedial medulla and spinal cord dorsal horn (36). Evidence indicates that glial plasticity in specific brain areas affect pain states, beyond the changes in numbers of glia occurring in the spinal cord and the peripheral nerves (15–17). Marked structural glial modifications may also occur in the PAG of MOP-KO mice that have baseline hyperalgesia, but the present study demonstrates that increased numbers of neuronal cells also contribute to volume abnormalities in that brain region. Neuronal changes in specific brain areas associated with chronic pain states, including hyperalgesia and allodynia, remain to be fully elucidated, so the extent to which these changes are specifically involved in hyperalgesia remains to be seen.
Our study has some limitations. Firstly, the examination was performed at 12 weeks of age, and our findings require corroboration from investigations at earlier stages of life. Secondly, increased regional gray matter volume in MOP-KO mice was observed in other brain regions, such as the hypothalamus and olfactory bulb (13). Further investigation of these brain regions is warranted to determine whether changes in all neural cell types are also detected in these regions as well. Thirdly, we did not examine baseline cytokine levels, or other potential mediators beyond MOP in MOP-KO mice that show baseline hyperalgesia. Specific cytokines may influence the numbers of glial cells observed in the PAG due to the deletion of MOP receptors. Finally, further study is warranted to clarify the sex-bias in each genotype since we did not analyze the data by sex.
In conclusion, the present study shows that increased numbers of microglia, and neurons, and greater astrocytic area, in the PAG in MOP-KO mice might result from developmental roles of by the endogenous opioid system. Further investigations based on the present findings are necessary to elucidate whether structural changes are observed earlier in life, and if so, why these changes are induced in specific brain areas, and what phenotypic outcomes are mediated by these cellular changes.
Statements
Author contributions
KS study design, immunohistochemistry, data interpretation, statistical analysis, and preparation of the manuscript. FH, GU, and IS data interpretation and preparation of the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (Start-up 26893009).
Acknowledgments
We would like to acknowledge the Platform of Experimental Animal Pathology at the Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University for the excellent technical help.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1.
SoraITakahashiNFunadaMUjikeHRevayRSDonovanDMet al. Opiate receptor knockout mice define mu receptor roles in endogenous nociceptive responses and morphine-induced analgesia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (1997) 94:1544–9.
2.
WangJCharboneauRBarkeRALohHHRoyS. μ-opioid receptor mediates chronic restraint stress-induced lymphocyte apoptosis. J Immunol. (2002) 169:3630–6. 10.4049/jimmunol.169.7.3630
3.
IdeSMinamiMSatohMUhlGRSoraIIkedaK. Buprenorphine antinociception is abolished, but naloxone-sensitive reward is retained, in mu-opioid receptor knockout mice. Neuropsychopharmacology (2004) 29:1656–63. 10.1038/sj.npp.1300463
4.
IdeSSoraIIkedaKMinamiMUhlGRIshiharaK. Reduced emotional and corticosterone responses to stress in mu-opioid receptor knockout mice. Neuropharmacology (2010) 58:241–7. 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2009.07.005
5.
KomatsuHOharaASasakiKAbeHHattoriHHallFSet al. Decreased response to social defeat stress in mu-opioid-receptor knockout mice. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. (2011) 99:676–82. 10.1016/j.pbb.2011.06.008
6.
MizoguchiHWuHENaritaMSoraIHallSFUhlGRet al. Lack of μ-opioid receptor-mediated G-protein activation in the spinal cord of mice lacking Exon 1 or Exons 2 and 3 of the MOR-1 gene. J Pharmacol Sci. (2003) 93:423–9. 10.1254/jphs.93.423
7.
SoraIElmerGFunadaMPieperJLiXFHallFSet al. Mu opiate receptor gene dose effects on different morphine actions: evidence for differential in vivo mu receptor reserve. Neuropsychopharmacology (2001) 25:41–54. 10.1016/s0893-133x(00)00252-9
8.
HallFSLiXFGoebMRoffSHoggattHSoraIet al. Congenic C57BL/6 μ opiate receptor (MOR) knockout mice: baseline and opiate effects. Genes Brain Behav. (2003) 2:114–21. 10.1034/j.1601-183X.2003.00016.x
9.
HallFSSoraIUhlGR. Ethanol consumption and reward are decreased in μ-opiate receptor knockout mice. Psychopharmacology (2001) 154:43–9. 10.1007/s002130000622
10.
HallFSGoebMLiXFSoraIUhlGR. mu-Opioid receptor knockout mice display reduced cocaine conditioned place preference but enhanced sensitization of cocaine-induced locomotion. Brain Res Mol Brain Res. (2004) 121:123–30. 10.1016/j.molbrainres.2003.10.024
11.
MoriyaYKasaharaYHallFSSakakibaraYUhlGRTomitaHet al. Sex differences in the effects of adolescent social deprivation on alcohol consumption in mu-opioid receptor knockout mice. Psychopharmacology (2015) 232:1471–82. 10.1007/s00213-014-3784-y
12.
HallFSSoraIUhlGR. Molecular mechanisms underlying behavioral effects of cocaine: lessons from knockout mice. Curr Pharmacogenom. (2004) 2:185–202. 10.2174/1570160043377673
13.
SasakiKSumiyoshiANonakaHKasaharaYIkedaKHallFSet al. Specific regions display altered grey matter volume in mu-opioid receptor knockout mice: MRI voxel-based morphometry. Br J Pharmacol. (2015) 172:654–67. 10.1111/bph.12807
14.
NiemanBJLerchJPBockNAChenXJSledJGHenkelmanRM. Mouse behavioral mutants have neuroimaging abnormalities. Hum Brain Mapp. (2007) 28:567–75. 10.1002/hbm.20408
15.
KuzumakiNNaritaMNaritaMHareyamaNNiikuraKNagumoYet al. Chronic pain-induced astrocyte activation in the cingulate cortex with no change in neural or glial differentiation from neural stem cells in mice. Neurosci Lett. (2007) 415:22–7. 10.1016/j.neulet.2006.12.057
16.
ZhaoPWaxmanSGHainsBC. Modulation of thalamic nociceptive processing after spinal cord injury through remote activation of thalamic microglia by cysteine cysteine chemokine ligand 21. J Neurosci. (2007) 27:8893–902. 10.1523/jneurosci.2209-07.2007
17.
MiyamotoKKumeKOhsawaM. Role of microglia in mechanical allodynia in the anterior cingulate cortex. J Pharmacol Sci. (2017) 134:158–65. 10.1016/j.jphs.2017.05.010
18.
HarburgGCHallFSHarristAVSoraIUhlGREischAJ. Knockout of the mu opioid receptor enhances the survival of adult-generated hippocampal granule cell neurons. Neuroscience (2007) 144:77–87. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2006.09.018
19.
EischAJBarrotMSchadCASelfDWNestlerEJ. Opiates inhibit neurogenesis in the adult rat hippocampus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2000) 97:7579–84. 10.1073/pnas.120552597
20.
ArguelloAAHarburgGCSchonbornJRMandyamCDYamaguchiMEischAJ. Time course of morphine's effects on adult hippocampal subgranular zone reveals preferential inhibition of cells in S phase of the cell cycle and a subpopulation of immature neurons. Neuroscience (2008) 157:70–9. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.08.064
21.
ThompsonPMGeTGlahnDCJahanshadNNicholsTE. Genetics of the connectome. Neuroimage (2013) 80:475–88. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.013
22.
MechlingAEArefinTLeeHLBienertTReisertMBenHamida Set al. Deletion of the mu opioid receptor gene in mice reshapes the reward-aversion connectome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2016) 113:11603–8. 10.1073/pnas.1601640113
23.
FranklinKPaxinosG. The Mouse Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates 3rd ed. Boston, MA: ElsevierAcademic Press (2004).
24.
BandlerRShipleyMT. Columnar organization in the midbrain periaqueductal gray: modules for emotional expression?Trends Neurosci. (1994) 17:379–89.
25.
BandlerRKeayKAFloydNPriceJ. Central circuits mediating patterned autonomic activity during active vs. passive emotional coping. Brain Res Bull. (2000) 53:95–104. 10.1016/S0361-9230(00)00313-0
26.
ZagonISMcLaughlinPJ. Endogenous opioid systems regulate cell proliferation in the developing rat brain. Brain Res. (1987) 412:68–72.
27.
ZagonISMcLaughlinPJ. Naltrexone modulates body and brain development in rats: a role for endogenous opioid systems in growth. Life Sci. (1984) 35:2057–64.
28.
ZagonISMcLaughlinPJ. Opioid antagonist (naltrexone) modulation of cerebellar development: histological and morphometric studies. J Neurosci. (1986) 6:1424–32.
29.
GackenheimerSLSuterTMPintarJEQuimbySJWheelerWJMitchCHet al. Localization of opioid receptor antagonist [3H]-LY255582 binding sites in mouse brain: comparison with the distribution of mu, delta and kappa binding sites. Neuropeptides (2005) 39:559–67. 10.1016/j.npep.2005.09.006
30.
BehbehaniMM. Functional characteristics of the midbrain periaqueductal gray. Prog Neurobiol. (1995) 46:575–605.
31.
LinnmanCMoultonEABarmettlerGBecerraLBorsookD. Neuroimaging of the periaqueductal gray: state of the field. Neuroimage (2012) 60:505–22. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.11.095
32.
DampneyR. Emotion and the cardiovascular system: postulated role of inputs from the medial prefrontal cortex to the dorsolateral periaqueductal gray. Front Neurosci. (2018) 12:343. 10.3389/fnins.2018.00343
33.
LewisVAGebhartGF. Evaluation of the periaqueductal central gray (PAG) as a morphine-specific locus of action and examination of morphine-induced and stimulation-produced analgesia at coincident PAG loci. Brain Res. (1977) 124:283–303.
34.
ManningBHFranklinKB. Morphine analgesia in the formalin test: reversal by microinjection of quaternary naloxone into the posterior hypothalamic area or periaqueductal gray. Behav. Brain Res. (1998) 92:97–102.
35.
CohenSRMelzackR. Morphine injected into the habenula and dorsal posteromedial thalamus produces analgesia in the formalin test. Brain Res. (1985) 359:131–9.
36.
OsbornePBVaughanCWWilsonH IChristieMJ. Opioid inhibition of rat periaqueductal grey neurones with identified projections to rostral ventromedial medulla in vitro. J Physiol. (1996) 490 (Pt 2):383–9.
Summary
Keywords
μ opioid, μ opioid receptor knockout (MOP-KO), periaqueductal gray matter (PAG), microglia, astrocytes, neuron, immunohistochemistry
Citation
Sasaki K, Hall FS, Uhl GR and Sora I (2018) Larger Numbers of Glial and Neuronal Cells in the Periaqueductal Gray Matter of μ-Opioid Receptor Knockout Mice. Front. Psychiatry 9:441. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00441
Received
28 June 2018
Accepted
28 August 2018
Published
19 September 2018
Volume
9 - 2018
Edited by
Lawrence Toll, Florida Atlantic University, United States
Reviewed by
Kabirullah Lutfy, Western University of Health Sciences, United States; Emmanuel Darcq, McGill University, Canada
Updates
Copyright
© 2018 Sasaki, Hall, Uhl and Sora.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Ichiro Sora sora@med.kobe-u.ac.jp
This article was submitted to Psychopharmacology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychiatry
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.