Impact Factor 3.161 | CiteScore 3.13
More on impact ›

Original Research ARTICLE

Front. Psychiatry, 09 October 2018 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00476

Changes in Post-migration Living Difficulties Predict Treatment Outcome in Traumatized Refugees

  • 1Department of Consultation Psychiatry and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
  • 2Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
  • 3School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia

Background: Refugee mental health is affected by traumatic stressors as well as post-migration living difficulties (PMLD). However, their interaction and causal pathways are unclear, and so far, no distinct treatment recommendations regarding exile-related stressors exist.

Methods: In a 3-year follow-up study, PMLD and symptoms of post-traumatic stress (PTS), depression and anxiety were examined in a clinical sample of severely traumatized refugees and asylum seekers (N = 71).

Results: In regression analysis, reduction in PMLD predicted changes over time in depression/anxiety, but not in PTS. The opposite models with PMLD changes as outcome variable proved not significant for PTS, and significant, though less predictive, for depression/anxiety.

Conclusions: In addition to well-established trauma-focused interventions for the treatment of PTS, psychosocial interventions focusing on PMLD might contribute to a favorable treatment response in traumatized refugees, particularly with regard to depression and anxiety.

Introduction

There are currently over 65 million people displaced worldwide due to conflict, violence, and persecution (1). Refugees, asylum-seekers and other forcibly displaced populations typically report exposure to a high number of potentially traumatic events in their countries of origin and during displacement. These experiences are often prolonged, repeated, and interpersonal in nature and have a pervasive negative impact on mental health (2, 3). Accordingly, refugees have consistently been observed to present with high prevalence rates of trauma related mental health problems, particularly posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, and anxiety (46).

In addition to past trauma, refugee mental health is also affected by difficulties arising after successful entry in a formally safe host country. Refugees usually face numerous daily challenges related to the post-migration environment, including those relating to lack of resources, family separation, social isolation, acculturation and discrimination, socioeconomic factors, and immigration and refugee policies. These displacement-related stressors have been shown to negatively impact on mental health over and above the effects of traumatic experiences (5, 79). Moreover, mental health problems of refugees are not limited to affected individuals, but can have a devastating impact on their families (10, 11).

While mental health problems due to traumatic and exile-related stressors can have a substantial impact on the psychological wellbeing of refugees and their close ones, they also lead to functional impairment. Refugees are usually expected, or legally obliged, to rapidly participate in the host society, particularly regarding language proficiency and financial independence. The process of social integration, however, implies high functional requirements in terms of cognitive and interpersonal capabilities, which refugees with psychological impairments are often not able to meet. Preliminary evidence shows that psychological impairment in refugees is associated with high levels of post-migration living difficulties (PMLD), and with poor social and economic integration (1214). Prompt and appropriate treatment of mental health problems in refugees is therefore not only an ethical, but also an economic concern in hosting societies in the sense that inadequate or unavailable treatment can lead to substantial long-term social costs. Accordingly, a recent study of severely traumatized refugees with severe trauma related disorders found treatment to be economically beneficial on family income level after 3 years (15).

While recent research suggests that mental health problems of refugees and asylum seekers are best captured by models integrating pre- and post-migration factors (1618), their complex interaction and causal pathways remain largely unclear. Accordingly, the therapeutic field is spread between two opposing assumptions: exponents of trauma-focused interventions consider trauma exposure the critical causal factor. They argue that an improvement of PTSD symptoms will lead to an improvement in functionality and better adaption to impending challenges of resettlement and acculturation. In contrast, for advocates of multimodal interventions, the attribution of causality focuses primarily on the overall stressful social and material conditions, suggesting a range of psychosocial interventions for the purpose of general stabilization, which, in turn, would allow better management of traumatic stress symptoms (8, 17). Evidence to date points to trauma-focused interventions being the most efficacious in reducing PTSD symptoms amongst refugees. In contrast, there has been little rigorous research investigating other approaches such as psychosocial interventions, and other diagnostic groups such as depression and anxiety disorders (17, 19).

Given the absence of a systematic framework to guide informed treatment decisions, research is urgently needed to examine the temporal and causal relationship between exposure to traumatic events and post-migration stressors, mental health, and real-life outcomes such as education, employment, or social integration (20). In view of the growing public health dimension of mental disorders in refugees, predictors and treatment moderators should be investigated in order to identify individuals for which specific approaches are indicated or those who fail to benefit from best practice interventions. Understanding the direction of causality between changes in psychological symptoms and changes in post-migration stressors would directly inform services tasked with supporting refugees in their host environment.

This study investigated the association between change in PTSD, depression and anxiety symptoms and change in post-migration stressors in a sample of refugees receiving treatment at a torture survivors' outpatient clinic. Participants were assessed at baseline and after a 3-year follow-up. To our knowledge, this is the first longitudinal study in a clinical sample of severely traumatized refugees to examine the relationship between PMLD and treatment trajectories. We hypothesized that participants would demonstrate reduced PTSD, depression and anxiety symptoms between baseline and follow-up assessment. We secondly hypothesized that improvements in PMLD scores between baseline and follow-up would relate to greater decreases in PTSD, depression and anxiety at follow-up. Finally, due to the exploratory character of the study and in consideration of a circular model, we had no hypothesis regarding the direction of causality between PMLD and psychiatric symptoms.

Methods

Participants

The sample consisted of participants of an earlier, cross-sectional study (N = 134, for details s. 12) who were re-assessed after a projected follow-up time of 3 years. Participants were refugees and asylum-seekers from a variety of countries of origin. They were in treatment in two psychiatric outpatient units for victims of torture and war in Zurich or Bern, Switzerland. Treatment included a variety of manualized trauma-specific as well as non-manualized unspecific psychotherapeutic interventions and medication, depending on symptom profiles and subjective focus of distress, individually adapted to the patients' needs and capacity with regard to content and dosage. In addition to treatment, all participants were offered social counseling, which individually addressed respective PMLD including accommodation, legal, financial or language problems, among others. Patients aged 18 years or older and speaking one of the study languages (German, English, Turkish, Arabic, Farsi, or Tamil) were included in the study. Current psychotic symptoms, severe dissociative symptoms, and acute suicidality led to exclusion. At follow-up, N = 44 participants could not be contacted any more, and N = 19 refused to participate. Only completers of the follow-up assessment were included in this study, resulting in a sample size of N = 71. Data collection took place between 2012 and 2013 (T1), and between 2015 and 2016 (T2), respectively. The follow-up time was M = 39.6 (SD = 4.6) months.

Measures

All measures used in the study were translated and back-translated, if necessary, by accredited translators in accordance with gold-standard translation practices (21). Discrepancies were rectified jointly by the research team and independent bilingual individuals who were experienced in working with health-related questionnaires.

Exposure to traumatic events was indexed using a measure derived from combining the trauma event lists of the Harvard Trauma Questionnaire [HTQ, (22)] and the Posttraumatic Diagnostic Scale [PDS, (23, 24)]. Overall trauma exposure was represented by a count of the number of traumatic event types (ranging from 0 to 23) experienced by each participant.

Symptoms of PTSD in the past month were measured using the PDS. The PDS contains 17 items assessing the occurrence of DSM-IV symptoms of PTSD in the previous four weeks on a 4-point Likert-scale (range 0–3). To account for the anticipated changes of the diagnostic criteria of PTSD in DSM-5 (25), which was not yet published at the beginning of the data collection, four additional items were added and one item was excluded, as it was no longer included in the DSM-5 diagnostic criteria. A comparison of DSM-IV and DSM-5 diagnostic criteria using part of this sample has been published elsewhere (26). We computed a total continuous score of PTSD symptoms (Range 0–60) and employed a DSM-5 based diagnostic algorithm to determine likely PTSD caseness. The scale has been used with numerous refugee groups [e.g., (27, 28)]. Cronbach's alpha at T1 in this study was 0.94.

Depression and anxiety in the past week were measured using the Hopkins Symptom Checklist HSCL-25 (29). This 25-item scale measuring psychological distress has been employed with a number of refugee groups [e.g., (30, 31)]. We computed subscale scores for anxiety and depression as well as a total continuous score (range 1–4). The validity of the often-used 1.75 cut-off criterion for clinically relevant anxiety and depression has been evaluated in relation to different populations around the world and found to be accurate (29, 32). Cronbach's alpha at T1 was 0.94.

Living difficulties were measured with the Post-Migration Living Difficulties Checklist (33, 34) adapted to the Swiss context (12). This 17-item scale (range = 0–68) examined the extent to which post-migration challenges had been a problem for the individual over the past 12 months. Items are rated on a five-point scale (0 = not a problem to 4 = very serious problem). Items scored at least 2 (“moderately serious problem”) were considered positive responses, yielding a total count of living difficulties. The PMLD scale has consistently been identified as a predictor of mental health among displaced populations (12, 31, 35).

Procedure

The study was approved by the Ethics Committees of the Cantons of Zurich and Bern. Written informed consent was obtained, with participants being informed they were free to withdraw from the study without influence on future treatment. Questionnaires were applied using a therapist-assisted computer-based assessment tool MAPSS [Multi-Adaptive Psychological Screening Software, (36)]. In MAPSS, self-report questionnaires are presented on an electronic tablet in both written and auditory form in the respondent's mother tongue. Assessments were supervised by a clinical psychologist or a masters-level student of clinical psychology. Participants were reimbursed CHF 40 (approx. USD 40) for participation.

Data Analysis

All statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS Version 25. Descriptive statistics are given in terms of means and standard deviations in continuous variables, and counts and percentages for categorical variables. Changes over time were calculated for all variables. Separate linear regression analyses (method: enter) were conducted for PTSD severity, depression/anxiety, and PMLD as outcome variables, respectively. Variables entered into the models included gender, trauma exposure, visa status (secure vs. insecure) and employment status (employed vs. unemployed) at T1, and change in PMLD between T1 and T2.

Results

Sample Characteristics

Sample characteristics are described in Table 1. Participants were from a variety of countries of origin, including Turkey (N = 42, 59.2%, with N = 34, 47.9% being Kurdish), Iran (N = 6, 8.5%), Sri Lanka (N = 6, 8.5%), Iraq (N = 4, 5.6%), Bosnia (N = 3, 4.2%), and other countries (N = 10, 14.1%, e.g. Afghanistan, Somalia, etc.). The education level was rather high with 75% of the sample having at least a high school degree. Despite an average stay in Switzerland of 10 years at baseline, only N = 14 (19.7%) had a fulltime or part-time employment, and roughly one fourth still had an insecure visa status. Participants reported severe lifetime trauma exposure with an average of 12.5 (SD = 4.3) potentially traumatic event types (PTE) experienced. The most commonly reported PTE included torture (85.9%), enforced isolation from others, combat situations (78.9% each), and imprisonment (77.9%). The least commonly reported were sexual assault by a stranger (26.8%) and sexual contact when younger than 18 (14.1%).

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Sample characteristics (N = 71).

A comparison on key variables between participants, who completed both time points versus those who completed Time 1 only, indicated significant differences exclusively regarding age and length of time in Switzerland, but not regarding symptoms scores, trauma exposure, and PMLD. Specifically, those who completed Time 2 were significantly older (t = 3.08, p = 0.002) and had lived in Switzerland for a longer time (t = 2.65, p = 0.01).

Symptom Scores

Symptom scores at baseline and follow-up are shown in Table 2. Symptoms of PTSD and depression/anxiety were significantly lower at follow-up. While 93% of the participants reported clinically relevant depressive symptoms at T1, only 62% did so at T2. With regard to anxiety, 88.7% were above the cut-off at T1, and 53.5% were above cut-off at T2. At T1, 47.9% had a probable PTSD diagnosis according to DSM-5 criteria as compared to 45.1% at T2. Fourteen participants (19.7%) reported symptom levels compatible with a new probable diagnosis of PTSD.

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2.Symptom severity (M/SD) of PTSD, depression and anxiety at T1 and T2.

Post-migration Living Difficulties

Frequencies of PMLD types at baseline and follow-up are shown in Table 3. More than half of PMLD types improved significantly along the treatment trajectory. Among the PMLD types with the most substantial improvement were issues related to visa status (“not being recognized as a refugee,” “being fearful of being sent back to your country of origin in the future,” “difficulties in interviews with immigration officials”). Frequently occurring PMLD types without improvement were mostly related to family members left back home (“worries about family back home,” “being unable to return to your home country in an emergency,” “separation from family”).

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Post-migration Living Difficulties experienced as moderately serious, serious or very serious (N = 71).

Predicting Change in Symptom Levels Over Time

The results of the regression analysis for PTSD and depression/anxiety controlled for gender, trauma exposure, visa status, education and changes over time in PMLD are shown in Table 4. Reduction in PMLD predicted changes over time in depression/anxiety as assessed with HSCL-25, accounting for 17.7% of the variance. The overall model was not associated with changes in PTSD, though the individual predictor was significant.

TABLE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4. Summary of the multiple regression analyses (N = 71).

In order to examine directionality of findings, we analyzed the opposite models with PMLD changes as outcome variable, and change in PTSD and depression/anxiety as the predictor variables, which proved not to be significant [F(5, 64) = 1.300, p = 0.275] for PTSD, but significant for depression/anxiety [F(5, 64) = 3.086, p = 0.015], respectively, explaining 13.1% of the variance.

Discussion

This 3-year longitudinal study investigated the association between changes in symptoms of PTSD, depression/anxiety and changes in post-migration living difficulties (PMLD) in a sample of severely traumatized refugees receiving treatment and social counseling in a specialized outpatient center.

Our hypothesis of generally lower symptom scores of PTSD and depression/anxiety at follow-up was fully supported by our findings. Along with mental health improvements, we found a significant reduction in more than half of the examined PMLD types as well as of the mean PMLD scores. Remarkably, while PTSD symptom scores on average improved under treatment, 14 participants (19.7%) who scored below the cut-off of probable PTSD diagnosis at baseline, exceeded this cut-off at follow-up. As all participants had a clinically established diagnosis of PTSD at the beginning of treatment (being a requirement for treatment uptake), it seems that after initially benefitting from therapy until the baseline assessment, some patients later experienced increased posttraumatic stress again. This finding has been described in other studies investigating refugees in the post-migration (37, 38). It can be hypothesized that, in our sample, additional traumatic experiences occurring during follow-up, and/or actualization of past traumatic experiences, e.g., due to political aggravation in the countries of origin, as was the case in Turkey, accounted for elevated PTS scores. Further longitudinal research is required to investigate this hypothesis.

The relationship between the observed improvements in PMLD and improvements in symptom scores was examined in various regression models with changes in PMLD, symptoms of depression/anxiety (as measured by the HSCL-25), and PTSD, respectively, as outcome variables. The best predictive model was that with depression/anxiety as outcome und PMLD changes as independent variable (17.7% of variance explained, p ≤ 0.001), while the models with changes in PTSD and PMLD as either outcome or independent variable proofed not significant. These findings connect to earlier studies showing that, in general, trauma-related factors seem to explain more variance in rates of PTSD, while post-migration or displacement-related stressors appear to particularly influence rates of mood and anxiety disorders, over and above the effects of past trauma [for overview s. (7, 8)]. In addition to the existing cross-sectional evidence, our longitudinal data suggest that, in a treatment-seeking sample of severely traumatized refugees and asylum seekers in the post-migration, improvements in PMLD predict a favorable treatment trajectory with regard to depression and anxiety, and could therefore be valuable targets of therapeutic interventions. This finding, though preliminary in nature and in need of replication, contributes to several fields of discussion and potentially has substantial implications:

A first implication appears with regard to explanatory models and causality. There is solid evidence that refugee mental health is related to both pre-migration, traumatic as well as post-migration stressors (7, 17). The scientific discourse on how these aspects are causally related, however, is prototypically divided between two opposing models (8, 39, 40): The war-exposure model on the one hand focuses on traumatic experiences and consecutive PTSD. Post-migration living difficulties are at least partly considered a consequence of trauma-related psychological impairment and supposed to be manageable after symptoms have improved. Accordingly, trauma-focused interventions within a cognitive-behavioral framework are considered first-line approaches. On the other hand, representatives of multimodal or psychosocial interventions primarily target general sources of distress, particularly exile-related stressors, with the objective of secondary psychological stabilization.

While the direction of causality is clear regarding traumatic experiences and trauma-related disorders, it is much less clear with PMLD and psychiatric symptoms: post-migration stressors could promote mental disorders such as depression and anxiety, and the latter could lead to functional impairment and, therefore, to PMLD. The findings in our sample now suggest that PMLD have a permissive or even causal role regarding the development of depression and anxiety in traumatized refugees, rather than vice versa. From a clinical perspective, this makes sense as many of the most distressing PMLD, such as insecure visa status, separation from family members, or restrictive asylum policies, are unswayable for affected persons, even if psychological impairment is successfully treated. However, while changes in PMLD were predictive for changes in depression/anxiety, the inverse model was statistically significant as well, though less predictive. The assumption of a unidirectional model seems therefore less conclusive than a circular model with PMLD contributing to mental health problems, and, to a minor degree, vice versa.

A second implication touches the question of how refugee mental health should best be addressed in the context of service provision. While the effectiveness of trauma-focused interventions with regard to symptoms of PTSD is well documented, this applies only to a minor degree to other psychiatric disorders such as depression and anxiety disorders, and (so far) not to psychosocial interventions (17). Our findings provide preliminary support that addressing PMLD via psychosocial interventions within a multimodal framework, including trauma-focused approaches, could enhance treatment response with regard to depression and anxiety and, therefore, justify the delivery of respective treatment options. Remarkably, in our sample, not all PMLD types were equally amenable to change. Most significant improvements were found in stressors related to visa status. Unfortunately, this issue is entirely out of reach for therapeutic as well as psychosocial interventions. On the other hand, no significant improvement at all could be achieved with regard to stressors related to separation from family members in participants' home countries. Therefore, the most promising targets of psychosocial interventions seem to be those post-migration stressors related to social integration such as language and employment.

A third important implication relates to immigration policies and social integration. In many high-income countries, the barriers for asylum seekers are high in order to avoid pull-factors. Many aspects of daily life of asylum seekers such as long asylum procedures, placement in camps, restrictive access to labor market, or prohibition of family reunion are intentionally harshened by the authorities. In contrast, after obtaining a residency permit, refugees are usually expected to rapidly engage in the host societies, particularly regarding language proficiency and financial independence. An earlier, cross-sectional study on partly the same sample found a high correlation between psychological impairment and integration difficulties (12). In addition, our longitudinal findings suggest that host societies could facilitate successful social integration of mentally ill asylum seekers and refugees by complementing timely and appropriate treatment with psychosocial interventions targeting PMLD. This is in line with a recent study of severely traumatized refugees which found multimodal treatment including social counseling to foster economic integration on family income level (15). Conversely, restrictive policies aiming at establishing stressful living conditions for refugees and asylum seekers might fuel PMLD and consecutive mental health problems, with negative consequences for social integration.

This study has a number of limitations. First, the sample size was small. This may have reduced our statistical power in uncovering relationships between variables. Second, participants were examined in different stages of therapy, rather than in proper pre-post-assessments, which may limit the comparability of trajectories. Due to the clinical character of the sample, our findings are not generalizable to subclinical refugee populations. Third, though we used transculturally validated measures whenever available, participants were from numerous cultural backgrounds, and thus, it was not possible to use measures validated with each cultural group. Yet, the use of a tablet-based therapist-assisted assessment tool allowed participants to be assessed in their respective mother tongues independently of their level of education. Finally, self-report measures were implemented instead of clinician-administered diagnostic interviews and an objective index of PMLD. It may be the case that those participants with high symptom scores were more likely to perceive objective stressors as more stressful.

Conclusions

This study provides preliminary evidence for the causal role of PMLD with regard to mental health problems of refugees and asylum seekers. Our findings support an ecological model of refugee mental health, which suggests that both pre-migration and post-migration stressors contribute to mental health outcomes (16). In addition to well-established trauma-focused interventions for the treatment of PTSD, our data suggest that psychosocial interventions focusing on PMLD might be able to contribute to a favorable treatment response, particularly with regard to depression and anxiety, and may therefore be a legitimate and valuable add-on in a multimodal treatment approach. Future research should examine (a) what PMLD topics are causing the most distress and impairment, (b) what topics are amenable to therapeutic interventions, and (c) what interventions are the most effective ones in order to achieve the greatest relief. Policy makers should recognize the role of daily stressors in contributing to psychological distress and their negative impact on social integration. It may be in the interest of host societies to support aid agencies, caseworkers or settlement service providers in addition to psychological treatment.

In addition, psychosocial interventions may be of particular interest in view of the fact that the highest share of displaced persons in need of support are not located in high-income countries, but in conflict, post-conflict or neighboring countries without access to (appropriate mental) health services. Non-medical approaches such as accessing social support and problem management, provided by helpers without health-professional background, are urgently needed (41). The required task-shifting from highly-qualified specialists to less specialized workers with fewer qualifications may be more likely to succeed with interventions addressing daily stressors than specific diagnoses (42).

Author Contributions

MS was involved in the conception of the study, in the interpretation of the data and the drafting of the manuscript. NM was involved in the conception and design of the study, the acquisition, analysis and interpretation of the data, and the drafting of the manuscript. PM was involved in the analysis and interpretation of the data, and the drafting and revision of the manuscript. US, RB, and AN designed the study and contributed to the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Parrotia Foundation, the Swiss Federal Office for Migration (3a-12-0495), and the Swiss Federal Office for Health (12.005187). The funders played no role in the design and conduct (i.e., data collection, analysis, interpretation) of this study.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

1. UNHCR. Global Trends 2016 (2017). Available online at: http://www.unhcr.org/5943e8a34.pdf

2. Karunakara UK, Neuner F, Schauer M, Singh K, Hill K, Elbert T, et al. Traumatic events and symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder amongst Sudanese nationals, refugees and Ugandans in the West Nile. Afr Health Sci. (2004) 4:83–93.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

3. Mollica RF, McInnes K, Pham T, Smith Fawzi MC, Murphy E, Lin L. The dose-effect relationships between torture and psychiatric symptoms in Vietnamese ex-political detainees and a comparison group. J Nerv Ment Dis. (1998) 186:543–53. doi: 10.1097/00005053-199809000-00005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Johnson H, Thompson A. The development and maintenance of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in civilian adult survivors of war trauma and torture: a review. Clin Psychol Rev. (2008) 28:36–47. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2007.01.017

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Bogic M, Njoku A, Priebe S. Long-term mental health of war-refugees: a systematic literature review. BMC Int Health Hum Rights (2015) 15:29. doi: 10.1186/s12914-015-0064-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Steel Z, Chey T, Silove D, Marnane C, Bryant RA, Van Ommeren M. Association of torture and other potentially traumatic events with mental health outcomes among populations exposed to mass conflict and displacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA (2009) 302:537–49. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1132

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Li SS, Liddell BJ, Nickerson A. The relationship between post-migration stress and psychological disorders in refugees and asylum seekers. Curr Psychiatry Rep. (2016) 18:82. doi: 10.1007/s11920-016-0723-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Miller KE, Rasmussen A. War exposure, daily stressors, and mental health in conflict and post-conflict settings: bridging the divide between trauma-focused and psychosocial frameworks. Soc Sci Med. (2010) 70:7–16. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.09.029

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Kartal D, Alkemade N, Eisenbruch M, Kissane D. Traumatic exposure, acculturative stress and cultural orientation: the influence on PTSD, depressive and anxiety symptoms among refugees. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. (2018) 53:931–41. doi: 10.1007/s00127-018-1532-z

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Schick M, Morina N, Klaghofer R, Schnyder U, Muller J. Trauma, mental health, and intergenerational associations in Kosovar Families 11 years after the war. Eur J Psychotraumatol. (2013) 4:21060. doi: 10.3402/ejpt.v4i0.21060

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Sangalang CC, Vang C. Intergenerational trauma in refugee families: a systematic review. J Immigr Minor Health. (2017) 19:745–54. doi: 10.1007/s10903-016-0499-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Schick M, Zumwald A, Knöpfli B, Nickerson A, Bryant RA, Schnyder U, et al. Challenging future, challenging past: the relationship of social integration and psychological impairment in traumatized refugees. Eur J Psychotraumatol. (2016) 7:28057. doi: 10.3402/ejpt.v7.28057

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. De Vroome T, Van Tubergen F. The employment experience of refugees in the Netherlands1. Int Migr Rev. (2010) 44:376–403. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-7379.2010.00810.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Bakker L, Dagevos J, Engbersen G. The importance of resources and security in the socio-economic integration of refugees. a study on the impact of length of stay in asylum accommodation and residence status on socio-economic integration for the four largest refugee groups in the Netherlands. J Int Migr Integration (2014) 15:431–48. doi: 10.1007/s12134-013-0296-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Bager L, Hansen KS, Andersen CJ, Wang S-JS. Does multidisciplinary rehabilitation of tortured refugees represent ‘value-for-money'? A follow-up of a Danish case-study. BMC Health Serv Res. (2018) 18:365. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3145-3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Miller K, Rasmussen A. The mental health of civilians displaced by armed conflict: an ecological model of refugee distress. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. (2016) 26:129–38. doi: 10.1017/S2045796016000172

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Nickerson A, Bryant RA, Silove D, Steel Z. A critical review of psychological treatments of posttraumatic stress disorder in refugees. Clin Psychol Rev. (2011) 31:399–417. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.10.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Silove D. The ADAPT model: a conceptual framework for mental health and psychosocial programming in post conflict settings. Intervention (2013) 11:237–48. doi: 10.1097/WTF.0000000000000005

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Pedersen D, Kienzler H, Guzder J. Searching for best practices: a systematic inquiry into the nature of psychosocial interventions aimed at reducing the mental health burden in conflict and postconflict settings. Sage Open (2015) 5:2158244015615164. doi: 10.1177/2158244015615164

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Nickerson A, Liddell B, Asnaani A, Carlsson JM, Fazel M, Knaevelsrud C, et al. Trauma and Mental Health in Forcibly Displaced Populations. An Int. Soc. Traumatic Stress Stud. (2017). Availabe Online at: http://www.istss.org/education-research/briefing-papers/trauma-and-mental-health-in-forcibly-displaced-pop.aspx

Google Scholar

21. Bontempo R. Translation fidelity of psychological scales: an item response theory analysis of an individualism-collectivism scale. J Cross-Cultural Psychol. (1993) 24:149–66. doi: 10.1177/0022022193242002

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Mollica RF, Caspi-Yavin Y, Bollini P, Truong T, Tor S, Lavelle J. The harvard trauma questionnaire. validating a cross-cultural instrument for measuring torture, trauma, and posttraumatic stress disorder in indochinese refugees. J Nerv Ment Dis. (1992) 180:111–6.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

23. Foa EB. Posttraumatic Diagnostic Scale Manual. Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems (1996).

24. Foa EB, Cashman L, Jaycox L, Perry KJ. The validation of a self-report measure of posttraumatic stress disorder: the posttraumatic diagnostic scale. Psychol Assess. (1997) 9:445–51. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.9.4.445

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, (DSM-5®). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing (2013).

26. Schnyder U, Müller J, Morina N, Schick M, Bryant RA, Nickerson A. A comparison of DSM-5 and DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder in traumatized refugees. J Trauma Stress. (2015) 28:267–74. doi: 10.1002/jts.22023

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Neuner F, Schauer M, Klaschik C, Karunakara U, Elbert T. A comparison of narrative exposure therapy, supportive counseling, and psychoeducation for treating posttraumatic stress disorder in an african refugee settlement. J Consult Clin Psychol. (2004) 72:579–87. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.72.4.579

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Norris AE, Aroian KJ. Assessing reliability and validity of the Arabic language version of the Post-traumatic Diagnostic Scale (PDS) symptom items. Psychiatry Res. (2008) 160:327–34. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2007.09.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Mollica RF, Wyshak G, de Marneffe D, Khuon F, Lavelle J. Indochinese versions of the Hopkins Symptom Checklist-25: a screening instrument for the psychiatric care of refugees. Am J Psychiatry (1987) 144:497–500.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

30. Carlsson J, Mortensen E, Kastrup M. A follow-up study of mental health and health-related quality of life in tortured refugees in multidisciplinary treatment. J Nerv Ment Dis. (2005) 193:651–7. doi: 10.1097/01.nmd.0000180739.79884.10

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Schweitzer R, Melville F, Steel Z, Lacherez P. Trauma, post-migration living difficulties, and social support as predictors of psychological adjustment in resettled Sudanese refugees. Aust New Zealand J Psychiatry (2006) 40:179–88. doi: 10.1080/j.1440-1614.2006.01766.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Veijola J, Jokelainen J, Laksy K, Kantojarvi L, Kokkonen P, Jarvelin MR, et al. The hopkins symptom checklist-25 in screening DSM-III-R axis-I disorders. Nord J Psychiatry (2003) 57:119–23. doi: 10.1080/08039480310000941

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Silove D, Sinnerbrink I, Field A, Manicavasagar V, Steel Z. Anxiety, depression and PTSD in asylum-seekers: assocations with pre-migration trauma and post-migration stressors. Br J Psychiatry (1997) 170:351–7. doi: 10.1192/bjp.170.4.351

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Steel Z, Silove D, Bird K, McGorry P, Mohan P. Pathways from war trauma to posttraumatic stress symptoms among Tamil asylum seekers, refugees, and immigrants. J Trauma Stress (1999) 12:421–35. doi: 10.1023/A:1024710902534

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Nickerson A, Steel Z, Bryant R, Brooks R, Silove D. Change in visa status amongst Mandaean refugees: relationship to psychological symptoms and living difficulties. Psychiatry Res. (2011) 187:267–74. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2010.12.015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Morina N, Ewers SM, Passardi S, Schnyder U, Knaevelsrud C, Müller J, et al. Mental health assessments in refugees and asylum seekers: evaluation of a tablet-assisted screening software. Conflict and health. (2017) 11:18. doi: 10.1186/s13031-017-0120-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Lamkaddem M, Stronks K, Deville W, Olff M, Gerritsen A, Essink-Bot M-L. Course of post-traumatic stress disorder and health care utilisation among resettled refugees in the Netherlands. BMC Psychiatry (2014) 14:90. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-14-90

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Schock K, Böttche M, Rosner R, Wenk-Ansohn M, Knaevelsrud C. Impact of new traumatic or stressful life events on pre-existing PTSD in traumatized refugees: results of a longitudinal study. Eur J Psychotraumatol. (2016) 7:32106. doi: 10.3402/ejpt.v7.32106.

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Miller KE, Rasmussen A. Mental health and armed conflict: the importance of distinguishing between war exposure and other sources of adversity: a response to Neuner. Soc Sci Med. (2010) 71:1385–9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.07.020

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Neuner F. Assisting war-torn populations–Should we prioritize reducing daily stressors to improve mental health? Comment on miller and rasmussen (2010). Soc Sci Med. (2010) 71:1381–4. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.06.030

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Sijbrandij M, Acarturk C, Bird M, Bryant RA, Burchert S, Carswell K, et al. Strengthening mental health care systems for Syrian refugees in Europe and the Middle East: integrating scalable psychological interventions in eight countries. Eur J Psychotraumatol. (2017) 8(Supp. 2):1388102. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2017.1388102

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Organization WH. mhGAP Intervention Guide for Mental, Neurological and Substance Use Disorders in Non-Specialized Health Settings. Version 1.0. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, 2010. 2017.

Keywords: refugees, asylum seekers, refugee mental health, posttraumatic stress disorder, psychosocial interventions, post-migration living difficulties, social integration

Citation: Schick M, Morina N, Mistridis P, Schnyder U, Bryant RA and Nickerson A (2018) Changes in Post-migration Living Difficulties Predict Treatment Outcome in Traumatized Refugees. Front. Psychiatry 9:476. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00476

Received: 09 June 2018; Accepted: 11 September 2018;
Published: 09 October 2018.

Edited by:

Michael Noll-Hussong, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Germany

Reviewed by:

Jutta Lindert, University of Applied Sciences Emden Leer, Germany
Graham R. Davidson, Retired, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Yesim Erim, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany

Copyright © 2018 Schick, Morina, Mistridis, Schnyder, Bryant and Nickerson. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Matthis Schick, matthis.schick@usz.ch