Impact Factor 2.857

Frontiers journals are at the top of citation and impact metrics

Original Research ARTICLE

Front. Psychiatry, 07 December 2018 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00647

Improving Cognition to Increase Treatment Efficacy in Schizophrenia: Effects of Metabolic Syndrome on Cognitive Remediation's Outcome

Marta Bosia1,2*, Mariachiara Buonocore2, Margherita Bechi2, Laura Santarelli1, Marco Spangaro2, Federica Cocchi2, Carmelo Guglielmino2, Laura Bianchi2, Serena Bringheli3, Francesca Bosinelli3 and Roberto Cavallaro1,2
  • 1School of Medicine, Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
  • 2Department of Clinical Neurosciences, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
  • 3School of Psychology, Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy

Cognitive impairment, typically more severe in treatment resistant patients, is considered a hallmark of schizophrenia and the prime driver of functional disability. Recent evidence suggests that metabolic syndrome may contribute to cognitive deficits in schizophrenia, possibly through shared underlying mechanisms. However, results are still contradictory and no study has so far examined the influence of metabolic syndrome on cognitive outcome after cognitive remediation therapy (CRT). Based on these premises, this study aims to investigate the relationship between metabolic syndrome and cognition, specifically considering cognitive outcome after treatment. Secondary objectives include the analysis of the association between cognitive impairment and psychopathological status and, in a subgroup of patients, the evaluation of the effect of Sterol Regulatory Element Binding Transcription Factor 1 (SREBF-1) rs11868035 genetic polymorphism, previously associated with metabolic alterations, on both cognition and metabolic syndrome. One-hundred seventy-two outpatients with schizophrenia were assessed for metabolic parameters and neurocognitive measures and 138 patients, who completed CRT, were re-evaluated for cognition. A subsample of 51 patients was also genotyped for rs11868035 from peripheral blood sample. Results show a negative impact of metabolic syndrome on executive functions and global cognitive outcome after CRT. Data also revealed a significant effect of SREBF-1 polymorphism, with a higher prevalence of metabolic syndrome and worse processing speed performance among G/G homozygous subjects, compared the A allele carriers. Overall these findings support the hypothesis that metabolic alterations may hamper the capacity to restore cognitive deficits, as well as they highlight the need to further explore possible converging mechanisms underlying both cognitive and metabolic dysfunction. At the clinical level, results point to the importance of a comprehensive assessment including the metabolic status of patients and of individualized strategies addressing metabolic dysfunction in order to potentiate treatment outcome in schizophrenia.

Introduction

Cognitive deficits are core features of schizophrenia, detectable in at least 75% of patients (1). The cognitive impairment is the prime driver of significant disabilities in occupational, social, and economic functioning in patients with schizophrenia (2) and still represents one of the most critical dimension in schizophrenia treatment. Standard antipsychotic drugs have only minimal effects on neuropsychological performance, even in the case of good antipsychotic response (3). Although the relationship between the degree of cognitive impairment and the severity of psychotic symptoms is not so straight-forward, treatment-resistant patients exhibit significantly poorer neurocognitive performance on a broad range of cognitive domains, such as selective attention, verbal memory, processing speed, and executive functions, compared to treatment responders (46). On the other hand, interventions aimed at improving cognition also showed some positive effects on different symptoms domains (7, 8). So far non-pharmacological interventions, more specifically cognitive remediation therapy (CRT), represent the gold-standard treatment for cognitive impairment. Several studies proved CRT efficacy and recently it has been demonstrated that, in certain patients, it may lead to a proper functional recovery, through the achievement of cognitive performance falling into “normal” range (9). However, it's important to stress the concept that results vary across subjects and are influenced by several individual variables, including genetic underpinning (1015). Identifying factors affecting cognitive performance and thus putative predictors of cognitive remediation is of major importance in order to personalize interventions and improve outcome. In this view, recent literature suggested a role of metabolic syndrome (MetS). MetS, consisting of a set of cardio-metabolic alterations, has been shown to increase the risk of cognitive decline in the general population, probably because of its effect on cerebral circulation (1518). This issue of MetS is particularly relevant in patients with schizophrenia, also because of its increased prevalence in this population (19, 20). Although recent studies explored the contribution of MetS to cognitive deficits in patients with schizophrenia (21), results are still conflicting. On the one hand, Lindenmayer et al. reported how schizophrenia patients with MetS showed significant cognitive impairments in several cognitive domains (22). On the other hand, results of the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) study suggested an unexpected relationship between elevated cholesterol and triglycerides levels and better cognitive functioning (23). Moreover, it is important to note that the relationship between cognitive deficits and metabolic alterations might be bidirectional, since impaired neurocognitive abilities (which lead to poor decision making and unhealthy lifestyle) may contribute to the higher prevalence of MetS among patients with schizophrenia. Remarkably, despite this evidence, the effect of MetS on the outcome of CRT in patients affected by schizophrenia, has never been investigated.

The relationship between MetS and cognition might be mediated also by genetic factors. Among these, the Sterol Regulatory Element Binding Transcription Factor 1 (SREBF-1) gene, regulating the expression of Sterol Regulatory Element-Binding Protein 1 (SREBP1) is of particular interest. On the one hand, SREBP1 is fundamental for the biosynthesis of fatty acids, cholesterol, triglycerides and phospholipids and abnormal SREBP-1 activity has been linked with obesity, insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes (24). On the other hand, lipid homeostasis is also essential in the central nervous system to guarantee the integrity of myelin membranes, as they are highly enriched for cholesterol, phospholipids and glycosphingolipids, thus suggesting a link between SREB1 regulation and brain function (25). More in details, Chen et al. found that genes involved in the lipogenic pathway were suppressed in dysbindin knockout mice (a genetic model of schizophrenia) and that maturation of SREBP1 was necessary for induction of an immediate early gene,known to influence cognitive functioning and especially critical for learning and memory (26). This evidence thus points out to a role of SREBP1 modulation in brain development and cognitive function, with possible implications for schizophrenia.

In sum, current literature highlights that MetS may aggravate the cognitive deficits in patients with schizophrenia and that this effect may be mediated by shared genetic factors. Moreover, these data provide a rationale for the hypothesis that MetS may hamper the capacity to restore cognitive deficits through cognitive remediation interventions.

Based on these premises, this study aims at investigating the effect of MetS on cognitive abilities and, innovatively with respect to previous literature, on cognitive outcome after CRT. Secondary objectives include the analysis of the relationship between the cognitive deficit and psychopathological status and, in a subgroup of patients, the evaluation of the effect of SREBF1 rs11868035 genetic polymorphism on both cognitive functioning and MetS.

Materials and Methods

Sample

This is a monocentric retrospective study, enrolling 172 patients diagnosed with schizophrenia according to DSM-IV-TR (27) criteria, followed at the Disease Unit for Psychotic Disorders of IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.

After a complete description of the study, informed consent to participation was obtained. The protocol followed the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the local Ethical Committee.

To be included, patients had to satisfy DSM-IV-TR diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia and the following conditions:

• No significant changes in psychopathologic status (requiring hospitalization or major change in pharmacologic treatment) in the 3 months prior to evaluations.

• No evidence of substance dependence or abuse, comorbid diagnoses on Axis I or II, epilepsy, or any other major neurological illness or perinatal trauma, or mental retardation.

One-hundred and thirty-eight subjects underwent 3 months of three 1-h sessions a week of Computer-assisted Cognitive Remediation Therapy performed with the Cogpack Software® (28). The protocol is detailed in previous studies (29, 30). In brief, sessions consisted of domain-specific neurocognitive exercises, aimed at training the cognitive functions impaired in the patient. CRT was administered by trained psychologists, whose role was to motivate patients and assist them in completing exercises and trying different strategies, without giving them the solutions to the exercises.

Assessment

All patients were assessed for psychopathology, neurocognitive performance and metabolic parameters. In the subsample of patients treated with CRT, neurocognition was evaluated both at baseline and within 2 weeks from the end of the intervention, while metabolic parameters were collected within a 3 months range before starting CRT.

Psychopathology was assessed by means of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), administered by trained psychiatrists.

Neuropsychological functioning was assessed with the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS). The BACS is a neuropsychological battery, designed in two versions (A and B) to evaluate patients before and after rehabilitation programs, without the results being influenced by recall. The entire battery, lasting ~30 min, consists of the following tests: verbal memory (words recall); working memory (digit sequencing); psychomotor speed and coordination (token motor task); processing speed (symbol coding); verbal fluency (production of words after semantic and literal cue); executive functions (Tower of London). From raw scores of each BACS subtest, both adjusted scores (corrected for age, education, and sex) and equivalent scores were derived, based on normative values for the Italian population (31). Equivalent scores are ranked into a 5-point interval scale, in which 0 sets the limit for pathological performance, 1 is considered as a borderline value, 2 and 3 indicate intermediate “normal” performance and 4 is equal or better than the median value. A global measure of cognitive efficiency (Cognitive Index) is obtained from the equivalent scores mean with a cut-off of 1, in which a score lower than 1 is indicative of global cognitive deficit, while a score of 1 or higher is considered within the normal range.

Data on metabolic parameters (waist circumference measured in centimeters, triglycerides, HDL-cholesterol measured from blood tests, systolic, and diastolic blood pressure measured in sitting position and fasting glycaemia) were collected from clinical records of patients. The presence of metabolic syndrome has been identified based on measurements according to the ATPIIIA criteria (32).

Genotyping

Peripheral venous blood samples were collected and DNA was extracted from whole blood by a manual extraction, using the “Illustra blood genomic Prep Midi Flow kit” (GE Healthcare, Milan, Italy). To identify the single nucleotide polymorphism G/A rs11868035, a standard Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) was performed with the following primers: 5′-GAGGAGGCTTCTTTGCTGTG-3′ and 5′-GGGTCAGTTGTCCCTTCTCA-3′. The PCR was carried out in a 10 μl volume containing 150 ng genomic DNA, 1 μl of 1 × Hot Master Taq Buffer with Mg++ (Eppendorf), 0.1 μl of each primer [50 uM], 1 μl of dNTPs [200 μM], 0.1 μl of Hot Master Taq [5 U/μl] (Eppendorf) and 0.5 μl of Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). After an initial step of 3 min at 94°C, 35 cycles of amplification (30 s at 94°C, 30 s at 57°C, and 30 s at 70°C) and a final extension step of 6 min at 70°C were performed. The amplified fragment was then purified by Multi-Screen Colum Loader (MILLIPORE), filled up and packaged with Sephadex G-50 (Sigma-Aldrich's) to remove residual PCR reagents. An aliquot of purified PCR product was then used to perform sequencing reaction, using DYEnamic ET Dye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Kit (GE Healthcare, Milan, Italy). In its turn, sequencing reaction product was purified following the abovementioned protocol, to remove the excess of fluorescent dyes not incorporated in the DNA fragment and then loaded onto a 48 capillaries genetic analyzer (MegaBace 500, GE Healthcare, Milan, Italy).

For the analysis, patients were grouped in G/G homozygous vs. carriers of the A allele, as in previous literature (33).

Data Analysis

First, Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Chi Squared Test for dichotomous variables, were performed to evaluate significant differences in socio-demographic, clinical and cognitive measures at baseline between patients grouped according to the presence or absence of MetS.

Second, ANOVA was performed to evaluate significant differences in PANSS scores between patients grouped according to the presence or absence of global cognitive impairment based on the BACS Cognitive Index cut-off.

Third, a Repeated Measures ANCOVA was conducted to evaluate the effect of MetS on changes in cognitive measures after CRT, with adjusted scores of each BACS subtest and the Cognitive Index pre and post-CRT as dependent variables, the diagnosis of MetS (present vs. absent) as independent variable, duration of illness as covariate and time as fixed factor. Tukey Unequal Number HSD post-hoc test followed.

Last, the possible influence of SREBF-1 rs11868035 on both metabolic parameters and cognitive performance at baseline was investigated in a subsample of 51 patients. In details, Chi Squared test was used to assess differences in the prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome between genotype groups (G/G homozygous vs. A carriers), while ANOVA was performed to evaluated differences in metabolic indices and BACS subtests' adjusted scores as well as the Cognitive Index.

Results

Effect of Metabolic Syndrome on Clinical and Cognitive Measures at Baseline

Clinical and Socio-Demographic Variables

In the whole sample analyzed, composed by 172 subjects, of which 107 males and 65 females, we observed a prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome of 22%.

Clinical and socio-demographical variables among MetS and non-MetS patients are detailed in Table 1. As noted in the table, there are no significant differences between the two groups, except for therapy distribution, showing that patients undergoing clozapine treatment have a higher prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome than those treated with other antipsychotics (32.69 vs. 17.5%, p = 0.02).

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Clinical and socio-demographical variables of patients, stratified by Metabolic Syndrome's diagnosis.

Cognitive Performance

The ANOVA showed no significant differences between patients with or without metabolic syndrome on the cognitive domains assessed by each BACS subtest, nor on the Cognitive Index. Table 2 shows mean BACS scores in patients with or without metabolic syndrome.

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Cognitive measures (Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia-BACS adjusted scores) in patients stratified by metabolic syndrome's diagnosis.

Relationship Between the Cognitive Deficit and Psychopathological Status

The one-way ANOVA with Cognitive Index (poor vs. normal performance) as independent variable and PANSS as dependent variables, showed significant difference on PANSS Total, Positive and Negative scales, with higher scores in patients with cognitive deficit, while no significant differences were detected for General symptomatology. Detailed results are reported in Table 3.

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Symptoms' severity (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale- PANSS scores) in patients stratified according to presence or absence of global cognitive impairment.

Effect of Metabolic Syndrome on Cognitive Remediation Therapy Outcome

In the sample of patients treated with 3-months CRT (138 subjects, of which 86 males and 52 females), the Repeated Measures ANCOVA showed a significant effect of MetS for executive functions and global cognition. Detailed results are reported in Table 4, while Figures 1, 2 show trajectories, respectively, of executive functions and global cognition from pre- to post-CRT in patients with and without MetS. Post-hoc analyses showed a significant improvement from baseline after CRT for both executive functions (p = 0.0009) and global cognition (p = 0.0001) only among patients without a diagnosis of Metabolic Syndrome.

TABLE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4. Effects of metabolic syndrome on cognitive improvement after cognitive remediation therapy (Repeated Measures ANCOVA).

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Executive functions (Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia-BACS, Tower of London adjusted mean scores and 0.95 confidence intervals) from pre- to post-cognitive remediation therapy in patients stratified by metabolic syndrome.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Global cognitive performance (Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia-BACS, Cognitive Index mean scores and 0.95 confidence intervals) from pre- to post-cognitive remediation therapy in patients stratified by metabolic syndrome.

Effect of SREBF1 Polymorphism on Metabolic Syndrome and Cognitive Measures

In the subsample of 51 patients, genotyped for SREBF1 rs11868035, the relative frequencies of the genotypes were 6% A/A, 53% GA, and 41% GG. The genotype distribution is in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (Chi2 = 2.24).

Significant differences between genotype groups emerged both in metabolic indices and cognition. As reported in Table 5, we found a significantly higher prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome, as well as significantly higher triglycerides values among G/G homozygous compared to A carriers.

TABLE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Table 5. Mean and standard deviation of metabolic indices in patients stratified by SREBF-1 genotype.

Regarding cognition, the ANOVA showed a significant difference between genotypes only for processing speed, with poorer performance among G/G homozygous compared to A carriers. Detailed results are provided in Table 6.

TABLE 6
www.frontiersin.org

Table 6. Cognitive measures (Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia-BACS adjusted scores) in patients stratified by SREBF-1 genotype.

Discussion

Cognitive dysfunction is a core feature of schizophrenia, with a significant negative impact on long-term functional outcome (34), thus representing a critical treatment issue. Currently available antipsychotic drugs seem to have only limited effects on cognition (35, 36) and, while some antipsychotics may outperform others in certain domains, no antipsychotic shows a global uniform cognitive profile (37). So far, cognitive remediation strategies are considered the best tool to improve cognition in schizophrenia, but there is still a high variability in results, pointing to the need of identifying predictors. Moreover, cognitive deficits are not only the main determinants of functional disability in treatment responders, but they are also associated with treatment resistance and a better clarification of the individual's factors associated with cognitive function may thus impact on global outcome. Among such factors, metabolic syndrome has gained increasing attention as a possible cause of more pronounced cognitive deterioration.

Based on these premises, innovatively with respect to previous literature, we investigated the relationship between MetS, cognition and outcome after CRT, in a sample of patients with chronic schizophrenia with the hypothesis that metabolic alterations may hamper the capacity to restore cognitive deficits. Secondary aims include the analysis of the association between the cognitive impairment and psychopathological status and, in a subgroup of patients, the evaluation of the effect of SREBF1 rs11868035 genetic polymorphism on both cognitive functioning and MetS.

Concerning the relationship between cognitive abilities and psychopathology, our results showed that patients with global cognitive deficit had more severe positive and negative symptoms, as assessed with the PANSS. These data add to the still open debate on the relationship between cognitive measures and symptoms' domains and are in line with previous evidence of an association between poorer cognitive performance and both positive and negative symptoms (38, 39).

Addressing metabolic syndrome, the prevalence in the sample was 22%, in line with the meta-analysis of Malhotra et al. reporting that the prevalence in patients treated with antipsychotics varies across studies from 11–69% (19). However, more recent meta-analyses indicate an overall rate of MetS of over 30% in patients with schizophrenia, with increased risk related to duration of illness and specific antipsychotic treatments (40, 41). The relatively low prevalence recorded in our sample may depend on the younger mean age (under 35) compared to other studies, as well as on the different antipsychotic treatments.

When analyzing the relationship between metabolic status and cognitive measures at baseline, no significant differences emerged between patients with or without MetS. The lack of a significant association between the diagnosis of Mets and poorer baseline cognitive abilities is in line with results of CATIE, reporting no relationship between MetS and cognitive deficit (23). However, several studies have found associations between some cognitive domains and both Metabolic Syndrome, as well as its components (21, 42).

The mechanisms by which MetS may influence cognition have been investigated in non-psychiatric populations. Several reviews (17, 43, 44) show how MetS and its components not only affect the peripheral circulation, but also induce structural and functional alterations in the cerebral vessels, including resistance, stiffening, and remodeling. For instance, changes in cerebral microcirculation also contribute to the development of cerebral small vessel disease possibly leading to white matter lesions, changes in gray matter microstructure, cerebral microbleeds, and neuronal atrophy. However, this association may be less detectable in subjects with schizophrenia, as these patients already present a pronounced cognitive impairment. The biological processes contributing to the core cognitive impairment are extremely relevant also in a therapeutic perspective. Interestingly CRT, which is the current gold standard for treatment of cognitive deficit has been proved to induce several structural and functional brain changes, probably through modulation of neuroplasticity (45, 46).

With the hypothesis that metabolic status could influence the patient's response to CRT, we analyzed the effects of MetS diagnosis on cognitive outcome in a sample of patients who completed a 3-months CRT protocol. In particular, we observed significant effects of the diagnosis of metabolic syndrome on executive functions, in its subcomponent of planning tested with the Tower of London, and on the Cognitive Index, a measure of global cognitive efficiency. Planning is a core domain of cognition, typically impaired in schizophrenia. It can be defined as a higher cognitive function, relying on a broad neural network that involves also other specific and lower level cognitive functions (i.e., memory and attention), also directly trained through CRT (47). Our results, showing a significant improvement in executive functions, as well as in the cognitive index only among patients without MetS, suggest that the standard CRT protocol may not be sufficient for patients with MetS. It is important to remind that, as explained above, MetS creates changes in brain microcirculation and in gray matter microstructure. Even though the mechanisms underlying CRT are not yet clarified, it can be hypothesized that the molecular processes and subsequent brain changes associated with MetS may provide a disadvantageous environment, negatively affecting CRT.

Although CRT currently represents the best available tool to treat cognitive deficits, effect sizes of improvements fall into a low-to-medium range, outlining the need to look for individual predictors of response, also as possible target for further potentiation. Our results suggest that future studies should address strategies for treatment of MetS, in order to make CRT much more effective in people affected by schizophrenia. For instance, recent evidence supports the effect of simple aerobic exercise (AE) on cognition, as AE also induces a cascade of molecular processes and brain volume changes (48). These data provide a biological rationale for a synergy of AE and CRT, with the hypothesis that a combined intervention will produce greater improvements that may be particularly relevant in patients affected by MetS, with additional benefits on physical health.

Further supporting a convergence in the biological mechanisms underlying both MetS and cognition, our results also revealed significant effect of SREBF-1 genetic polymorphism. In details, concerning MetS, a significant difference between the two genotypes emerged, showing that G/G homozygous subjects have higher triglycerides, as well as an increased prevalence of MetS, compared to carriers of the A allele. It is known that SREBPs are implicated in the synthesis of fatty acids, triglycerides, and cholesterol in all organs (49) and our finding supports previous literature showing an association between the G allele and the risk to develop Type II Diabetes, as well as other metabolic disturbances in both non-psychiatric populations and patients with schizophrenia (50, 51). Regarding cognitive functions, the role of SREBF on cognition is less explored and far from being clear. Our results evidenced significantly lower scores among patients G/G homozygous, compared to A carriers in processing speed. This domain is particularly relevant in schizophrenia, as it correlates with poor prognosis and functional disability (52). Moreover, processing speed usually shows only modest improvement after CRT (53). Interestingly, in a neuroimaging study, Bollettini et al. observed that the rs11868035 G/G genotype is associated with increased fractional anisotropy in several white matter tracts mainly located in the left hemisphere of patients affected by schizophrenia (54). Although they did not explore neuropsychological correlates, increases in fractional anisotropy have been associated with poorer cognitive performance in visuo-spatial abilities in neurological conditions (55). Our finding is also in line with a recent study of Chen et al. which showed, in an animal model of schizophrenia, that SREBP1 modulates an immediate early gene, known to influence cognitive functioning (26). This evidence thus points out to a role of SREBP1 modulation in brain development and cognitive function, with possible implications for schizophrenia.

This study presents some limits that need to be acknowledged. First, this is a retrospective study and the association between MetS and cognitive outcome after CRT still needs more exhaustive investigation through prospective clinical trials, also including a control group. Moreover, patients were not stratified according to different pharmacological treatments and age groups, relevant aspects that need to be taken into account in future studies. Furthermore, it is to notice that all patients were taking chronic pharmacological treatment and we cannot exclude that medications may cause both disturbances in cognition and metabolic syndrome, rather than there being any direct link. Finally, the analysis on the genotype is conducted on a very limited sample size, which hampers the statistical power and therefore no conclusions can be drawn.

Despite these limitations, results suggest that MetS influences CRT-induced dynamic modulation of cognitive functions. The data also point out possible effects of SREBF-1 polymorphism on both cognition and metabolic syndrome, highlighting the need to further explore putative converging mechanisms underlying both conditions. At the clinical level, results emphasize the importance to comprehensively assess the metabolic status of patients in rehabilitation settings in order to implement individualized strategies to reach a better global outcome in patients with schizophrenia. In this view, the evaluation of MetS before starting CRT may allow to identify a sub-population of “difficult-to-treat” patients, requiring an integrated and more intensive approach to improve cognition. On the one hand, these patients may benefit from a concomitant intervention specifically addressing MetS, such as aerobic exercise, on the other they may also obtain further gains with a longer duration of CRT.

Ethics Statement

This study was carried out in accordance with the recommendations of Good Clinical Practice with written informed consent from all subjects. All subjects gave written informed consent in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The protocol was approved by the Ethics Commitee of ASL Città di Milano and prorogated by the Ethics Commitee of Ospedale San Raffaele di Milano.

Author Contributions

MBo: Undertook the data analysis. MBo, MBu, and LS: Drafted the manuscript. MBu, MBe, FC, LB, CG, MS, FB, and SB: Collected the data and contributed to data interpretation. FB and SB: Performed bibliographic search. MBo, MBu, MBe, and MS: Were engaged in forming the concept and designing the study, supervised by RC. All authors critically revised the manuscript, contributed to and have approved the final manuscript.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

1. Keefe RS, Harvey PD. Implementation considerations for multisite clinical trials with cognitive neuroscience tasks. Schizophr Bull. (2008) 34:656–63. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbn042

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Green MF, Kern RS, Braff DL, Mintz J. Neurocognitive deficits and functional outcome in schizophrenia: are we measuring the “right stuff”? Schizophr Bull. (2000) 26:119–36. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a033430

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Keefe RS, Bilder RM, Davis SM, Harvey PD, Palmer BW, Gold JM, et al. Neurocognitive effects of antipsychotic medications in patients with chronic schizophrenia in the CATIE Trial. Arch Gen Psychiatry (2007) 64:633–47. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.64.6.633

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. de Bartolomeis A, Balletta R, Giordano S, Buonaguro EF, Latte G, Iasevoli F. Differential cognitive performances between schizophrenic responders and non-responders to antipsychotics: correlation with course of the illness, psychopathology, attitude to the treatment and antipsychotics doses. Psychiatry Res. (2013) 210:387–95. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2013.06.042

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Frydecka D, Beszłej JA, Gościmski P, Kiejna A, Misiak B. Profiling cognitive impairment in treatment-resistant schizophrenia patients. Psychiatry Res. (2016) 235:133–8. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2015.11.028

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Anderson VM, McIlwain ME, Kydd RR, Russell BR. Does cognitive impairment in treatment-resistant and ultra-treatment-resistant schizophrenia differ from that in treatment responders? Psychiatry Res. (2015) 230:811–8. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2015.10.036

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Mahmood Z, Clark JMR, Twamley EW. Compensatory cognitive training for psychosis: effects on negative symptom subdomains. Schizophr Res. (2018). doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2018.09.024. [Epub ahead of print].

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Prikken M, Konings MJ, Lei WU, Begemann MJH, Sommer IEC. The efficacy of computerized cognitive drill and practice training for patients with a schizophrenia-spectrum disorder: a meta-analysis. Schizophr Res. (2018). doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2018.07.034. [Epub ahead of print].

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Bosia M, Buonocore M, Bechi M, Spangaro M, Pigoni A, Croci M, et al. Cognitive remediation and functional improvement in schizophrenia: is it a matter of size? Eur Psychiatry (2017) 40:26–32. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2016.06.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Bosia M, Bechi M, Marino E, Anselmetti S, Poletti S, Cocchi F, et al. Influence of catechol-O-methyltransferase Val158Met polymorphism on neuropsychological and functional outcomes of classical rehabilitation and cognitive remediation in schizophrenia. Neurosci Lett. (2007) 417:271–4. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2007.02.076

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Bosia M, Bechi M, Pirovano A, Buonocore M, Lorenzi C, Cocchi F, et al. COMT and 5-HT1A-receptor genotypes potentially affect executive functions improvement after cognitive remediation in schizophrenia. Health Psychol Behav Med. (2014) 2:509–16. doi: 10.1080/21642850.2014.905206

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Bosia M, Zanoletti A, Spangaro M, Buonocore M, Bechi M, Cocchi F, et al. Factors affecting cognitive remediation response in schizophrenia: the role of COMT gene and antipsychotic treatment. Psychiatry Res. (2014) 217:9–14. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2014.02.015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Lindenmayer JP, Khan A, Lachman H, McGurk SR, Goldring A, Thanju A, et al. COMT genotype and response to cognitive remediation in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. (2015) 168:279–84. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2015.07.037

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Buonocore M, Bosinelli F, Bechi M, Spangaro M, Piantanida M, Cocchi F, et al. The role of premorbid adjustment in schizophrenia: focus on cognitive remediation outcome. Neuropsychol Rehabil. (2018) 19:1–14. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2018.1433048

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Kontis D, Huddy V, Reeder C, Landau S, Wykes T. Effects of age and cognitive reserve on cognitive remediation therapy outcome in patients with schizophrenia. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry (2013) 21:218–30. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2012.12.013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Yaffe K, Kanaya A, Lindquist K, Simonsick EM, Harris T, Shorr RI, et al. The metabolic syndrome, inflammation, and risk of cognitive decline. JAMA (2004) 292:2237–42. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.18.2237

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Mellendijk L, Wiesmann M, Kiliaan A. Impact of nutrition on cerebral circulation and cognition in the metabolic syndrome. Nutrients (2015) 7:9416–39. doi: 10.3390/nu7115477

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Philippou E, Michaelides MP, Constantinidou F. The role of metabolic syndrome factors on cognition using latent variable modeling: the neurocognitive study on aging. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. (2018) 40:1030–43. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2018.1483487

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Malhotra N, Grover S, Chakrabarti S, Kulhara P. Metabolic syndrome in schizophrenia. Indian J Psychol Med. (2013) 35:227–40. doi: 10.4103/0253-7176.119471

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Gupta A, Dadheech G, Yadav D, Sharma P, Gautam S. Metabolic issues in schizophrenic patients receiving antipsychotic treatment. Indian J Clin Biochem. (2014) 29:196–201. doi: 10.1007/s12291-013-0415-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Bora E, Akdede BB, Alptekin K. The relationship between cognitive impairment in schizophrenia and metabolic syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol Med. (2017) 47:1030–40. doi: 10.1017/S0033291716003366

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Lindenmayer JP, Khan A, Kaushik S, Thanju A, Praveen R, Hoffman L, et al. Relationship between metabolic syndrome and cognition in patients with schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. (2012) 142:171–6. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2012.09.019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Lieberman JA, Stroup TS, McEvoy JP, Swartz MS, Rosenheck RA, Perkins DO, et al. Effectiveness of antipsychotic drugs in patients with chronic schizophrenia. N Engl J Med. (2005) 353:1209–23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa051688

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Müller-Wieland D, Knebel B, Haas J, Kotzka J. SREBP-1 and fatty liver.Clinical relevance for diabetes, obesity, dyslipidemia and atherosclerosis. Herz (2012) 37:273–8. doi: 10.1007/s00059-012-3608-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Steen VM, Skrede S, Polushina T, López M, Andreassen OA, Fernø J, et al. Genetic evidence for a role of the SREBP transcription system and lipid biosynthesis in schizophrenia and antipsychotic treatment. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. (2017) 27:589–98. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2016.07.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Chen Y, Bang S, McMullen MF, Kazi H, Talbot K, Ho MX, et al. Neuronal activity-induced Sterol Regulatory Element Binding Protein-1 (SREBP1) is disrupted in dysbindin-null mice-potential link to cognitive impairment in schizophrenia. Mol Neurobiol. (2017) 54:1699–709. doi: 10.1007/s12035-016-9773-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association (2000).

Google Scholar

28. Marker KR. COGPACK. The Cognitive Training Package Manual. Heidelberg: Marker Software (2007). Available online at: http://www.markersoftware.com.

29. Cavallaro R, Anselmetti S, Poletti S, Bechi M, Ermoli E, Cocchi F, et al. Computer-aided neurocognitive remediation as an enhancing strategy for schizophrenia rehabilitation. Psychiatry Res. (2009) 169:191–6. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2008.06.027

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Poletti S, Anselmetti S, Bechi M, Ermoli E, Bosia M, Smeraldi E, et al. Computer-aided neurocognitive remediation in schizophrenia: durability of rehabilitation outcomes in a follow-up study. Neuropsychol Rehabil. (2010) 20:659–74. doi: 10.1080/09602011003683158

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Anselmetti S, Poletti S, Ermoli E, Bechi M, Cappa S, Venneri A, et al. The brief assessment of cognition in schizophrenia. Normative data for the Italian population. Neurol Sci. (2008) 29:85–92. doi: 10.1007/s10072-008-0866-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Daniels SR, Donato KA, Eckel RH, Franklin BA, et al. Diagnosis and management of the metabolic syndrome: an American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Scientific Statement. Circulation (2005) 112:2735–52. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.169404

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Peng XE, Chen FL, Liu W, Hu Z, Lin X. Lack of association between SREBF-1c gene polymorphisms and risk of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in a Chinese Han population. Sci Rep. (2016) 6:32110. doi: 10.1038/srep32110

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Bowie CR, Reichenberg A, Patterson T L, Heaton RK, Harvey PD. Determinants of real-world functional performance in schizophrenia subjects: correlations with cognition, functional capacity, and symptoms. Am J Psychiatry (2006) 163:418–25. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.163.3.418

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Lindenmayer JP, Iskander A, Park M, Apergi FS, Czobor P, Smith R, et al. Clinical and neurocognitive effects of clozapine and risperidone in treatment-refractory schizophrenic patients: a prospective study. J Clin Psychiatry (1998) 59:521–7. doi: 10.4088/JCP.v59n1005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Hill SK, Bishop JR, Palumbo D, Sweeney JA. Effect of second-generation antipsychotics on cognition: current issues and future challenges. Expert Rev Neurother. (2010) 10:43–57. doi: 10.1586/ern.09.143

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Nielsen RE, Levander S, Kjaersdam Telleus G, Jensen SOW, Östergaard Christensen T, Leucht S. Second-generation antipsychotic effect on cognition in patients with schizophrenia—a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Acta Psychiatr Scand. (2015) 13:185–96. doi: 10.1111/acps.12374

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Ince E, Üçok A. Relationship between persistent negative symptoms and findings of neurocognition and neuroimaging in schizophrenia. Clin EEG Neurosci. (2018) 49:27–35. doi: 10.1177/1550059417746213

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Jenkins LM, Bodapati AS, Sharma RP, Rosen C. Working memory predicts presence of auditory verbal hallucinations in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder with psychosis. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. (2018) 40:84–94. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2017.1321106

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Mitchell AJ, Vancampfort D, Sweers K, van Winkel R, Yu W, De Hert M. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome and metabolic abnormalities in schizophrenia and related disorders–a systematic review and meta-analysis. Schizophr Bull. (2013) 39:306–18. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbr148

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Vancampfort D, Stubbs B, Mitchell AJ, De Hert M, Wampers M, Ward PB. et al. Risk of metabolic syndrome and its components in people with schizophrenia and related psychotic disorders, bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis World Psychiatry (2015) 14:339–47. doi: 10.1002/wps.20252

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Li C, Zhan G, Rao S, Zhang H. Metabolic syndrome and its factors affect cognitive function in chronic schizophrenia complicated by metabolic syndrome. J Nerv Ment Dis. (2014) 202:313–8. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000124

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Siervo M, Harrison SL, Jagger C, Robinson L, Stephan BCM. Metabolic syndrome and longitudinal changes in cognitive function: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Alzheimers Dis. (2014) 41:151–61. doi: 10.3233/JAD-132279

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Kim B, Feldman EL. Insulin resistance as a key link for the increased risk of cognitive impairment in the metabolic syndrome. Exp Mol Med. (2015) 47:e149. doi: 10.1038/emm.2015.3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Lett TA, Voineskos AN, Kennedy JL, Levine B, Daskalakis ZJ. Treating working memory deficits in schizophrenia: a review of the neurobiology. Biol Psychiatry (2014) 75:361–70. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.07.026

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Malchow B, Keeser D, Keller K, Hasan A, Rauchmann B-S, Kimura H, et al. Effects of endurance training on brain structures in chronic schizophrenia patients and healthy controls. Schizophr Res. (2016) 173:182–91. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2015.01.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Buonocore M, Bosia M, Bechi M, Spangaro M, Cavedoni S, Cocchi F, et al. Is longer treatment better? A comparison study of 3 versus 6 months cognitive remediation in schizophrenia. Neuropsychology (2017) 31:467–73. doi: 10.1037/neu0000347

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Cassilhas RC, Tufik S, de Mello MT. Physical exercise, neuroplasticity, spatial learning and memory. Cell Mol Life Sci. (2016) 73:975–83. doi: 10.1007/s00018-015-2102-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Espenshade PJ. SREBPs: sterol-regulated transcription factors. J Cell Sci. (2006) 119:973–6. doi: 10.1242/jcs02866

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Musso G, Bo S, Cassader M, De Michieli F, Gambino R. Impact of sterol regulatory element-binding factor-1c polymorphism on incidence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and on the severity of liver disease and of glucose and lipid dysmetabolism. Am J Clin Nutr. (2013) 98:895–906. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.113.063792

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Yang L, Chen J, Liu D, Yu S, Cong E, Li Y, et al. Association between SREBF2 gene polymorphisms and metabolic syndrome in clozapine-treated patients with schizophrenia. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry (2015) 56:136–41. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2014.08.015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Dickinson D, Ramsey ME, Gold JM. Overlooking the obvious: a meta-analytic comparison of digit symbol coding tasks and other cognitive measures in schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry (2007) 64:532–42. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.64.5.532

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Wykes T, Huddy V, Cellard C, McGurk SR, Czobor P. A meta-analysis of cognitive remediation for schizophrenia: methodology and effect sizes. Am J Psychiatry (2011) 168:472–85. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.10060855

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Bollettini I, Barberi I, Poletti S, Radaelli D, Pirovano A, Lorenzi C, et al. Sterol regulatory element binding transcription factor-1 gene variation and medication load influence white matter structure in schizophrenia. Neuropsychobiology (2015) 71:112–9. doi: 10.1159/000370076

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Hoeft F, Barnea-Goraly N, Haas BW, Golarai G, Ng D, Mills D, et al. More is not always better: increased fractional anisotropy of superior longitudinal fasciculus associated with poor visuospatial abilities in Williams syndrome. J Neurosci. (2007) 27:11960–5. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3591-07.2007

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: psychosis, neuroremediation, neuropsychology, rehabilitation, metabolic alterations

Citation: Bosia M, Buonocore M, Bechi M, Santarelli L, Spangaro M, Cocchi F, Guglielmino C, Bianchi L, Bringheli S, Bosinelli F and Cavallaro R (2018) Improving Cognition to Increase Treatment Efficacy in Schizophrenia: Effects of Metabolic Syndrome on Cognitive Remediation's Outcome. Front. Psychiatry 9:647. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00647

Received: 24 July 2018; Accepted: 16 November 2018;
Published: 07 December 2018.

Edited by:

Mirko Manchia, Università degli studi di Cagliari, Italy

Reviewed by:

Virginio Salvi, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Italy
Catherine Harmer, Warneford Hospital, United Kingdom

Copyright © 2018 Bosia, Buonocore, Bechi, Santarelli, Spangaro, Cocchi, Guglielmino, Bianchi, Bringheli, Bosinelli and Cavallaro. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Marta Bosia, bosia.marta@hsr.it