SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article
Sec. Addictive Disorders
Excessive Exercise—A Meta-Review
- 1Department of Sport, Exercise and Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- 2Deutsche Hochschule für Gesundheit und Sport GmbH, Ismaning, Germany
- 3University Psychiatric Clinics, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
Background and Aims: While a number of studies have reported on individuals who exercise excessively, and feel unable to stop despite negative consequences, there is still insufficient evidence to categorize exercise as an addictive disorder. The aim of this meta-review is to summarize the published articles and to compile a list of symptoms reported in the qualitative literature in conjunction with excessive exercise. This list is compared with the DSM-5 criteria for gambling disorder, and initial diagnostic criteria for exercise addiction are suggested.
Methods: The databases MEDLINE, Web of Science and PsycInfo were searched for qualitative studies or case reports, in which excessive exercise was the main focus. All symptoms reported in conjunction with excessive exercise were extracted from each study and documented. Symptoms were also compared to the diagnostic criteria for gambling disorder.
Results: Seventeen studies were included in the review, yielding 56 distinct symptoms. The Critical Appraisal Skills Program tool showed that the majority of the studies were of acceptable quality. Exercise-related symptoms corresponded with seven of the nine DSM-5 criteria for gambling disorder. The ten suggested criteria for exercise addiction are: increasing volume, negative affect, inability to reduce, preoccupation, exercise as coping, continuation despite illness/injury, minimization, jeopardized relationships, continuation despite recognizing consequences, guilt when exercise is missed.
Discussion: Our results suggest that excessive exercise may constitute a behavioral addiction, based on the criteria of the DSM-5.
Conclusions: Subsequent studies should aim to systematically classify symptoms of excessive exercise; in addition, it should be noted that basic questionnaires may be need to be supplemented with detailed clinical examinations.
The fact that the typically healthy practice of exercise may in some cases become unhealthy has been discussed in the scientific literature for almost 50 years. Since Baekeland (1) reported that subjects recruited to a study on sleep were highly resistant to changing their exercise habits to meet his requirements, exercise has come to be seen as a potentially negative pursuit. Due to the fact that the characteristics of harmful exercise habits seem, at face value, to have much in common with substance-related disorders, the term “exercise addiction” has been employed since the late 70 s (2). These characteristics, which in subsequent years have been cataloged in a number of case studies, include escalation, tolerance, continuance despite acknowledged negative effects, social conflict and withdrawal symptoms (3, 4). Ostensibly affected individuals spend several hours per day exercising (5, 6), prioritize exercise sessions above everything else in their lives (7), and feel unable to stop this pattern (8, 9). Individuals who stop experience anguish and guilt, and generally resume the habit very soon. These symptoms represent a psychological burden on this affected individual, but also frequently entail physical or health impairments, such as injury, poor recovery from injury, and chronic upper respiratory infection (10).
In more recent years, prevalence estimates have been made, although these have varied widely (11). For instance, figures of between 40 and 50% have been reported for some exercising populations, while in others, prevalence has been reported at below 10%; in studies of general populations, figures tend to be below 1% (12). This variance has been attributed in part to the variety of measurement instruments which are used to asses risk for a potential exercise addiction. Certain questionnaires contain items which may be unsuitable for distinguishing professional or amateur athletes from those who feel compelled to exercise (13). As little is currently known about the etiology of an addiction to exercise, the questionnaires are currently based on theoretical conceptualizations, rather than well-established disease histories. To date, reviews have reported a higher prevalence among men (14), and players of team sports appear to be affected as frequently as individual athletes (though more research has been carried out with the latter group) (15). Between 38 and 45% of individuals with eating disorders are also reported to suffer from symptoms of a possible exercise addiction (12). This high prevalence has led some scholars to suggest that symptoms which are attributed to “exercise addiction” are in fact only manifestations of an eating disorder, and should not be understood in the context of a separate behavioral addiction (16). However, most scholars accept that there is also evidence of individuals who exercise excessively without concerns about weight or food consumption; this distinction is addressed in more detail in section Primary and Secondary Exercise Addiction, below.
Inclusion in the DSM
Currently, “exercise addiction” has not been universally accepted as a form of behavioral addiction (17, 18). To date, only gambling disorder is included in the DSM-5 as a non-substance-related disorder. The criteria for diagnosis resemble those for substance-related disorders (such as the development of a tolerance for the amount of time spent gambling and a corresponding need to increase it, continuance despite recognition of the negative consequences entailed by gambling, and feelings of anxiety and compulsion to continue when abstaining) but have some behavior-specific variations, such as the criteria referring to the urge to gamble to offset a “losing streak.” It has frequently been noted that the establishment of further behavioral addictions will involve similar tailored criteria (17). Broad theoretical frameworks for behavioral addictions in general have been proposed. The I-PACE model lays out a large number of variables which interact to foster a behavioral addiction, including individual characteristics, inhibitory control, and cue-reactivity (19). The core component of “gratification” can be fulfilled by a wide variety of behaviors or substances, and the model has gained widespread use in addiction research. A further component group, the specific needs, motives, and values of the individual, can also be adapted to specific behaviors. Consequently, the model does much to escape the criticism of some behavioral addiction research, namely that it is atheoretical and therefore owes too much to confirmatory studies of largely anecdotal evidence (18). The model also avoids including DSM criteria such as tolerance and withdrawal, which it has been argued do not have a place in behavioral addictions (20). Diagnostic criteria for exercise addiction can therefore be expected to resemble those of substance-related or gambling disorders, as certain key components are common to addictive disorders per se, but will include certain exercise-specific formulations or unique symptoms.
Partly as a consequence of the lack of conceptual work underpinning a possible exercise addiction, the phenomenon is not yet categorized as a non-substance related disorder in the DSM-5, nor recognized in the ICD 11. The American Psychological Association explicitly states that, as yet, there is insufficient evidence to definitively categorize the disorder, if it really is a disorder (21). However, a search of the PubMed database using the above-mentioned terms reveals that over 100 studies have addressed this phenomenon (13). A final key issue, therefore, is that these studies have not yet supplied enough information about core aspects of a potential exercise addiction.
Primary and Secondary Exercise Addiction
A second theoretical consideration, specific to exercise behaviors, is the posited existence of “primary” and “secondary” forms of exercise addiction (22). This distinction, introduced by De Coverley Veale in 1987, takes as its central focus the motivation behind the exercise behavior. “Primary exercise dependence” should only be considered after an eating disorder (specifically anorexia or bulimia nervosa) has been excluded. In this case, the motivation of the exerciser is not solely weight control, but pursuing exercise as an end in itself. In the presence of an eating disorder, the exercise behavior is understood as a means to an end, and is thus classed as “secondary.”
In summary, suspicions that exercise might constitute a behavioral addiction have not yet been backed up by strong evidence. While many avenues of research are required before a potential disorder can be fully characterized, a first step is to systematically synthesize what has to date been reported about the issue. It is also crucial to outline a possible path for future clinical interviews.
In this article, we chose not to use the term “exercise addiction,” as this would be akin to assuming a fact that we are trying to investigate. The same is true for terms such as “compulsive” or “obligatory” exercise, which imply psychological dimensions of the phenomenon that have not yet been satisfactorily demonstrated. We have used the term “excessive exercise,” without quotation marks from this point on, as this captures the necessary criterion of exercise going beyond with is healthy (or, in athletes, required) without invoking terminology from the psychological lexicon.
The primary aim of this study was to compile an exhaustive list of symptoms that have been associated with excessive exercise. Due to the limitations of questionnaire-based research in this field, noted above, and the lack of detailed symptom description in such studies (as respondents can only rate a standard list of statements, rather than detail their own experiences), this meta-review focused solely on case reports and clinical interviews. This pool of data presents an excellent source for examining symptoms which have been reported in the context of excessive exercise, as detailed feedback from study participants can be reported verbatim. To date, this data has never been synthesized. We have compared the resulting list of symptoms with the DSM-5 criteria for gambling disorder, in order to illustrate whether there are parallels which may inform the future categorization of excessive exercise. Furthermore, we have presented an initial suggestion for 10 criteria to be used in a clinical interview screening for possible “exercise addiction.”
The secondary aim was to identify any inconsistencies between questionnaire-based and qualitative investigations of excessive exercise, in qualitative studies which also employ quantitative measures. This is to enable an assessment of whether currently employed questionnaires are useful in assessing unhealthy exercise behavior.
This review is important because reports of excessive exercise indicate that affected individuals not only suffer from a psychological burden comparable to that of other behavioral and substance-related addictions, but also because excessive exercise can have a negative impact on physical health. Studies report individuals training despite broken bones and severe muscular injury; furthermore, overtraining syndrome, which severely impacts the health of affected individuals, may also originate with excessive exercise. Diagnostic criteria for exercise addiction will therefore be an important step in identifying and offering treatment to those affected.
Materials and Methods
The current study was carried out following the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) (23).
A meta-review is a systematic extraction and synthesis of qualitative research findings. This method is suited to providing a description of a new phenomenon (24). As noted above, numerous quantitative studies have examined the phenomenon of excessive exercise. However, these studies do not involve asking affected individuals about their symptoms, and are therefore not suited to addressing a research aim that involves cataloging symptoms. We have therefore focused solely on qualitative studies, case reports, and resources which involve, by their nature, a description of the symptoms experienced. For this reason, numerous studies on excessive exercise have been excluded if they contain only quantitative data (see Figure 1), and the included studies are sometimes of poor quality (see Figure 2) or not peer-reviewed. The decision to include them was based on prioritizing the exhaustiveness of the search. However, the reader must be aware that such studies are presented here. While our approach is different from a traditional meta-analysis, and excludes a number of studies addressing the topic of excessive exercise, this study uniquely targets the experience of excessive exercise.
The MEDLINE, Web of Science and PsycINFO databases were searched. All studies from the date of database creation until the 10th of January 2019 were considered eligible. The following terms were used: “exercise addiction” or “exercise dependence” or “compulsive exercise” or “obsessive exercise” or “obligatory exercise” or “over-exercise” or “excessive exercise” AND “qualitative” or “interview” or “case.” While the terms were only entered in English, studies in English, French or German were included if they were identified following these methods. Manual searches of the reference list of articles identified as being relevant were also carried out. The titles and abstracts of retrieved studies were read, independently, by two team members (FC and RC). Studies meeting the inclusion criteria were gathered, and compared by the two researchers. Any discrepancies were discussed, and in case of uncertainty, were determined by a third team member (MW). The final list of studies included in the review is the result of this process.
Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
Studies which met the following criteria were included in the current meta-review: (a) high levels of physical activity or exercise, which are associated with psychological distress for the sufferer in some way, represent the main psychiatric issue, phenomenon or disorder under discussion, irrespective of the name ascribed to that issue; (b) qualitative interviewing or a case description was amongst the methods used. Qualitative studies including quantitative measure were therefore considered suitable; quantitative studies with no qualitative assessment were not.
The following exclusion criteria were applied: A disorder other than excessive exercise was the condition under examination, even though participants might have excessive exercise habits.
Following Lachal et al. (25) summary of possible approaches to study quality evaluation in meta-reviews, we employed the Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) tool (Critical Appraisal Skills Programme, 2018) for qualitative research. This simple checklist allows for a number of quality indicators relevant for qualitative studies to be categorized as totally met, partially met, or not met. The tool is among those recommended by the Cochrane Collaboration for the evaluation of qualitative studies. There is not standard cut-off value for this checklist. In view of the fact that we are seeking to summarize all available evidence related to our topic, we have not excluded any study based on poor quality. However, an overview of study quality may be useful in future research on this topic, so we have included the CASP checklist in Figure 2.
FC and RC independently read all included studies in full. The following parameters were extracted for this meta-review: study methodology, number of participants, participant characteristics, forms of exercise engaged in by participants, the volume (in hours) of training engaged in by study participants, problematic symptoms reported as a result of exercise habits, inconsistency between qualitative and quantitative findings, psychiatric comorbidities of the participants (at any time).
The comparison with DSM-5 criteria for gambling disorder was achieved by FC and MW independently agreeing on the symptoms from the initial list of 57 which best fit the criteria (in some cases, more than one symptom is matched to one criterion). The suggested criteria for a clinical interview were arrived independently by FC and MW, and agreed upon with RC. This two-step process involved first compiling all severe psychologically burdensome symptoms from the initial list of 57, and organizing these in line with the DSM criteria for addictive disorders. These are not to be understood as criteria for inclusion in the DSM framework at this stage, or an attempt to map exercise habits onto the current framework. Rather, this is a guide for clinical interviewing to support the establishment of evidence-based criteria in the future.
The PRISMA flow diagram in Figure 1 shows the number of studies identified, screened and included. Following screening, 749 articles were excluded as they were not relevant to the question addressed here. Reasons for further exclusions are presented in Figure 1.
Seventeen studies (5–9, 26–37) were included in this meta-review. Sample sizes ranged between 1 (5, 6, 9, 31, 33, 35, 36) and 134 (34). This comprised seven case descriptions (5, 6, 9, 26, 31, 33, 36), six qualitative semi-structured interviews (7, 8, 27–30) (of which two are in fact separate analyses of a single data pool), one qualitative structured interview (34), one written questionnaire with open questions (37), and two qualitative interviews of unclear form (32, 35). Nine also employed quantitative instruments to assess problems related to exercise (7, 26–29, 31, 34, 35, 37). For the following section on study characteristics, the two articles which report on a single data pool (8, 30) were only be counted once (although both citations have been listed).
Fourteen studies reported on the general form of exercise engaged in by the participants (5–9, 26–31, 33, 35–37). In five studies, participants from a variety of exercise forms were represented (8, 27–30, 38). Among all studies, individual exercise was reported in 13 cases (6–9, 26–31, 33, 35–37), competitive sport participation in seven cases (5, 7, 8, 27, 29, 30, 39), professional sporting activity in 3 cases (7, 28, 29), and team sport participation in one case (29).
Ten studies reported the approximate volume (in hours) of exercise engaged in by their participants (7–9, 26, 28–31, 33, 35). Hours per week range from 1 (29) to 24 (28) (this includes figures from studies involving individuals who do not exercise excessively).
Ten studies reported that at least some respondents had been diagnosed with, or met the diagnosis criteria for, a psychiatric comorbidity (6–8, 27, 29–34, 36). In all but one case (31), the diagnosis was an eating disorder, and in six (7, 8, 27, 30, 33, 34), participants were at least partially recruited through eating disorder treatment centers or organizations. This is an important potential confounder for this study, as a number of symptoms listed here may in fact result directly and solely from eating disorders. We have included these studies, because, as stated above, they examine exercise as the primary problematic behavior. In our symptom list, we also highlighted all symptoms identified in studies where a comorbidity was diagnosed (n = 36).
Six studies reported some degree of inconsistency between the various measurements of excessive exercise employed (7, 27–29, 34, 35). Typically, this is between qualitative and quantitative instruments.
All studies and extracted data are presented in Table 1.
Table 2 provides an exhaustive list of symptoms described in the included studies (n = 56). These symptoms were reported as being consequences of the participants' exercise habits; however, in a number of cases, the participants also report other psychiatric disorders, so an overlap of symptoms from, for example, eating disorders cannot be excluded. For this reason, we have marked all symptoms reported in a study including other comorbidities with an asterisk.
We have grouped the identified symptoms into seven distinct categories: Body, Food, Negative Experiences, Positive Experiences, Control, Withdrawal Symptoms and Other Characteristics. In the case of Withdrawal Symptoms, all items in the category were explicitly listed as being withdrawal symptoms in the text. In all other cases, the categorization was made post-hoc by the authors.
Symptoms Fitting DSM-5 Criteria for Gambling Disorder
In Table 3, we listed the 9 DSM-5 criteria for diagnosing gambling disorder, and the symptoms identified in this review which correspond to these criteria. The criterion for which parallels were most frequently found is “needs to gamble with increasing amounts of money in order to achieve the desired excitement.” In the case of excessive exercise, this is characterized by increasing exercise duration, in some cases specifically against the directions of a coach.
In two cases (“After losing money gambling, often returns another day to get even”; “Relies on others to provide money or relieve a desperate financial situation caused by gambling.”), no parallels in exercise behavior were identified.
In Table 3, we also presented initial suggestions for ten criteria to use in a clinical interview where excessive exercise appears to be a factor. These criteria reflect both the gambling disorder and substance-related disorder criteria of the DSM-5. This suggestion is a first approach to developing criteria based on empirical evidence drawn from the first meta-review of symptoms accompanying excessive exercise. It is neither exhaustive nor complete without further detailed screenings, but may serve as a guideline for clinical interviewing that aims to establish more about the nature of excessive exercise.
The results of the quality assessment were presented in Figure 2. The majority of the studies were found to be of acceptable quality, with most criteria being fulfilled or at least partially fulfilled. Three studies (6, 36, 40) had mostly partially fulfilled or unfulfilled criteria. Notably, the issues of the researcher-participant relationship and the ethical issues considered in the study design were frequently categorized as being only partially or not at all fulfilled. As noted above, no studies were excluded on the grounds of poor quality. Consequently, the results of this meta-review include poor quality and non-peer-reviewed studies.
This meta-review provides, for the first time, a list of symptoms reported as arising in individuals who exercise excessively. Excessive exercise is reported to result in physical and psychological problems for those affected, and consequently may require treatment to improve mental and physical well-being. This review is intended to contribute to the categorization of excessive exercise as either a symptom cluster which accompanies other disorders, or a definable behavioral addiction. The results indicate that there is sufficient evidence to further explore the phenomenon in terms of a behavioral addiction. While our findings cannot be compared with a prospective study to identify disease history, combining results from a variety of narrative reviews and case studies enables us to obtain detailed information about the nature of this phenomenon.
Fulfilling the DSM-5 Criteria for a Non-substance Related Addictive Disorder
A key question is whether the evidence gathered here indicates that exercise should indeed be considered as a form of behavioral addiction. Based on the findings of the meta-review, there is evidence that excessive exercise does indeed resemble gambling disorder, and hence that it could be considered a behavioral addiction. The symptoms identified represent a psychological (and sometimes physical) burden to the affected individuals which are comparable to those of the DSM-5 criteria for non-substance related disorders, and based on these, a similar list of diagnostic criteria has been established. The diagnostic criteria suggested here include an increase in exercise volume to avoid feeling lazy, an inability to reduce exercise volume, lying to family and friends about time spent exercising, and continuing despite illness or injury. These criteria resemble those of substance-related or gambling disorder, but are specifically based on experiences reported in the context of excessive exercise.
Importantly, it should be emphasized that a number of the symptoms identified were categorized as “positive experiences.” As with most addictive substances and behaviors, sport is often enjoyed by humans, and can, according to certain reports, lead to a “high” sensation (41). Seeking these positive experiences, to the degree that control over consumption or activity is lost, is sometimes cited as a feature of an addictive disorder. While not explicitly reflected in the DSM-5 criteria (5), it is a feature of the ICD-11 guidelines on disorders due to substance use (42). While the positive experiences become increasingly overshadowed by negative ones as an addiction to substances develops, certain positive elements can still remain (43). The same may be the case in excessive exercise.
Following our initial categorization, we have also sought to identify symptoms which appear to match the DSM-5 criteria for gambling disorder. Our reason for this was to present an initial example of whether exercise behaviors could fit an established framework of a behavioral addiction. By first creating an exhaustive list of symptoms, and only then searching to establish parallels with other addictive disorders (rather than slipping the word “exercise” into the DSM criteria a priori), we present empirical evidence for excessive exercise to be categorized as a behavioral addiction. To date, gambling disorder is the only behavioral addiction with established criteria in the DSM-5. However, gambling and exercise behaviors naturally differ greatly, and mapping one onto the other is not a viable approach to establishing a diagnosis. Our aim here was to present evidence that excessive exercise has characteristics understood, in other contexts, to constitute an addiction; the inclusion of “exercise addition” in the DSM framework would certainly entail the development of exercise specific criteria, as we have suggested with our examples here. However, this step must be preceded by a thorough investigation of the etiological process that underlies excessive exercise behavior, to avoid the pitfalls of reification that have affected work on other behavioral addictions (17).
Finally, criteria for “exercise addiction” will need to be precise enough to avoid automatically including highly motivated or elite athletes. While a number of studies seem to indicate that athletes (as opposed to fitness and recreational exercisers) report equally high or higher scores on exercise addiction questionnaires, compared to other exercisers, this findings have been received critically by several authors. Szabo et al. (11) summarize the quantitative data on this topic, and point out that high level athletes are very unlikely to have lost control of their behavior, or exercise beyond what is required to excel at their sport; they will also, by necessity, recognize the benefits of recovery to improve performance. In their study reporting that athletes have higher scores for exercise addiction, but also passion for sport, de la Vega et al. (44) suggest that athletes interpret exercise addiction questionnaires differently; for example, they may indeed be “unable” to reduce time spent exercising, but this is because they understand that completing a planned session is a part of attaining their goals, perhaps as instructed by a coach; it is not due to pathological compulsion. The lack of sensitivity of existing questionnaires, which may result in athletes being incorrectly characterized as at risk of addiction, is further discussed in the section Quantitative Measures below. A more precise screening instrument could, potentially, also contain items which reduce the overall score, such as “Are you a professional or performance athlete?”, and “Are you training for a specific event?”
A potential confounder of our results is that a number of the studies included here represent respondents diagnosed with eating disorders. It has been suggested that excessive exercise habits are always “secondary” to an eating disorder. In other words, while exercise might still constitute a behavioral addiction, it would appear only in individuals with eating disorders (27). On this understanding, our results might be “contaminated” with symptoms that are really the result of an eating disorder. As noted above, the majority of symptoms in our exhaustive list were mentioned in studies with sufferers of eating disorders. However, twenty are not, and of those which are, it cannot conclusively be stated that they are fully explained by the eating disorder (some studies, for example, have samples which include individuals with and without eating disorders). It is also possible that in individuals who are addicted to exercise, disordered eating patterns emerge later, perhaps as a consequence of exercise-induced malnutrition (45). It is clear that excessive, perhaps compulsive exercising plays a role in a number of eating disorder types, and is engaged in by up to 50% of sufferers (46). Our results here, which include a study where a diagnosis of anorexia was an exclusion criterion (28), provide initial evidence that excessive exercise is more than just an eating disorder symptom.
In certain studies, quantitative methods were used to categorize or otherwise assess participants. Instruments used included the Exercise Addiction Inventory, the Exercise Dependence Scale, and the Exercise Dependence Questionnaire. As noted in the Introduction, these instruments are not based on diagnostic criteria for exercise addiction, but follow conceptual developed from addiction research in general. Due to the noted issues with varying prevalence estimates which have arisen following the use of these questionnaires, there have been concerns about their usefulness. A key aim of the current study was therefore the elaboration of criteria which are based solely on empirical reports of excessive exercise, an approach which has to date not been employed in the development of instruments assessing the risk of exercise addiction.
Our approach permits a valuable comparison of qualitative results with certain quantitative measures, allowing these to be given some context, based on the experiences of affected individuals. The category of “inconsistency” in Table 1 was introduced to illustrate when discrepancies seem to occur between the results of questionnaires and interview responses. Concretely, an inconsistency is an instance of a questionnaire and a qualitative questioning technique yielding different results with regards to an individual's risk of exercise addiction.
Johnston et al. (29) explicitly address this issue when describing their results:
“For example, Linda (categorized as a non-obligatory exerciser) stated: I often think that if I…became ill or I had an injury that would prevent me from exercising, would be just the worst possible thing that could happen in my life! At the other extreme, Deborah, a 77-year-old with arthritis whose sole exercise involved walking her dog, was classified as an obligatory exerciser.”
As the content of questionnaires in the field of excessive exercise have been the subject of debate (13), this is a useful indicator of the potential and limitations of these quick screening tools. As the previous example suggests, an individual who reports that they have to exercise and cannot reduce the volume may very well be carrying out a responsibility, in this case dog-walking. Developing questionnaires based on a systematic examination of excessive exercise habits and behaviors appears to be of importance.
Classifying excessive exercising as a behavioral addiction will have implications for the therapeutic approaches employed to manage it. Primarily, if it is to be distinguished from other mental disorders such as eating disorders, the focus of therapeutic discussions will be substantially different. The aim of our initial clinical diagnostic criteria is to serve as a guide to the development of clinical and therapeutic approaches to excessive exercise. A status as an addictive disorder would, for example, suggest that attention might need to be paid to the positive reinforcing effects of exercise, with cessation of activity potentially negatively impacting mood in a manner that requires targeted treatment. Any physiological similarities to other addictive disorders (e.g., dopaminergic activity, reduced prefrontal cortical activity) may also guide treatment strategies by employing methods or pharmacotherapies used for other diagnoses.
We chose to focus only on qualitative research in this study. Consequently, many high-quality studies have been excluded because they report only quantitative results. While the aims of our study could only be met by employing qualitative data, we acknowledge that a large amount of the research into excessive exercise is not represented here.
By including studies that focus on excessive exercise, rather than other psychiatric conditions where excessive exercise habits happen to be present, we necessarily excluded a number of studies which may mention symptoms linked to excessive exercise (47, 48). We adopted this approach in order to ensure, as far as possible, that our symptom list contained findings that represent the literature on excessive exercise. In order to include as many case studies as possible, we opted to include papers, such as Letters to the Editor, which are not peer-reviewed.
We sought to provide as complete a list as possible of symptoms and characteristics that have been reported in association with excessive exercise. We established category headings in order to make this more user-friendly. However, we fully acknowledge that our categorizations may represent certain biases, and that certain readers may disagree with separating themes such as “Food” and “Body,” particularly in a context linked to eating disorders.
It must also be noted that in certain cases, authors have reported symptoms within the framework of a definition of addiction. Consequently, it is possible that certain symptoms have been described in a specific way, and other potentially underemphasized or overlooked, as the authors sought to match symptoms with a categorization of “addiction.” This approach necessarily influences the contents of our list, and must be borne in mind for its interpretation.
This meta-review of studies suggests that a number of symptoms reported by individuals affected by excessive exercise resemble symptoms of other addictive disorders. The findings therefore indicate that there is sufficient evidence to further explore the phenomenon in terms of a behavioral addiction. The results further suggest that there is some inconsistency between risk for “exercise addiction” as measured by self-reports, and the presence of symptoms and diagnostic criteria reported in detailed clinical interviewing. While we conclude that the evidence suggests excessive exercise is likely to be a behavioral addiction, future studies must analyze the relevance of other co-occurring mental disorders, and employ more sensitive interviewing techniques on excessive exercise patterns.
Data Availability Statement
The datasets analyzed in this article are not publicly available. Requests to access the datasets should be directed to Flora Colledge, email@example.com.
FC developed the research question, carried out the database search, and drafted the manuscript. RC replicated the database search and revised the manuscript. UB, AS, UP, MG, GW, and UL revised the manuscript. MW developed the research question, resolved differences regarding studies to be included, and revised the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
This study was funded by the Gertrud Thalmann Fonds.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
4. Freimuth M, Moniz S, Kim SR. Clarifying exercise addiction: differential diagnosis, co-occurring disorders, and phases of addiction. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2011) 8:4069. doi: 10.3390/ijerph8104069
9. Vitale C, Santangelo G, Verde F, Amboni M, Sorrentino G, Grossi D, et al. Exercise dependence induced by pramipexole in Parkinson's disease-a case report. Mov Disord. (2010) 25:2893–4. doi: 10.1002/mds.23323
12. Cook B, Karr TM, Zunker C, Mitchell JE, Thompson R, Sherman R, et al. Primary and secondary exercise dependence in a community-based sample of road race runners. J Sport Exerc Psychol. (2013) 35:464–9. doi: 10.1123/jsep.35.5.464
13. Colledge F, Buchner UG, Schmidt A, Walter M. Does exercise addiction exist? A brief review on current measurement tools and future directions. Ment Health Addict Res. (2019) 4:1–4. doi: 10.15761/MHAR.1000181
15. Lichtenstein MB, Larsen KS, Christiansen E, Støving RK, Bredahl TVG. Exercise addiction in team sport and individual sport: prevalences and validation of the exercise addiction inventory. Addict Res Theory. (2014) 22:431–7. doi: 10.3109/16066359.2013.875537
16. Cunningham HE, Pearman S III, Brewerton TD. Conceptualizing primary and secondary pathological exercise using available measures of excessive exercise. Int J Eat Disord. (2016) 49:778–92. doi: 10.1002/eat.22551
17. Kardefelt-Winther D, Heeren A, Schimmenti A, van Rooij A, Maurage P, Carras M, et al. How can we conceptualize behavioural addiction without pathologizing common behaviours? Addiction. (2017) 112:1709–15. doi: 10.1111/add.13763
18. Billieux J, Schimmenti A, Khazaal Y, Maurage P, Heeren A. Are we overpathologizing everyday life? A tenable blueprint for behavioral addiction research. J Behav Addict. (2015) 4:119–23. doi: 10.1556/2006.4.2015.009
19. Brand M, Wegmann E, Stark R, Müller A, Wölfling K, Robbins TW, et al. The interaction of person-affect-cognition-execution (I-PACE) model for addictive behaviors: update, generalization to addictive behaviors beyond internet-use disorders, and specification of the process character of addictive behaviors. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. (2019) 104:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.06.032
20. Ko C-H, Yen J-Y. Commentary on: are we overpathologizing everyday life? A tenable blueprint for behavioral addiction research. Excessive behaviors are not necessarily addictive behaviors. J Behav Addict. (2015) 4:130–1. doi: 10.1556/2006.4.2015.015
23. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. (2009) 6:e1000097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
26. Anandkumar S, Manivasagam M, Kee VTS, Meyding-Lamade U. Effect of physical therapy management of nonspecific low back pain with exercise addiction behaviors: a case series. Physiother Theory Pract. (2018) 34:316–28. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2017.1394410
28. Cox R, Orford J. A qualitative study of the meaning of exercise for people who could be labelled as “addicted” to exercise –can “addiction” be applied to high frequency exercising? Addict Res Theory. (2004) 12:167–88. doi: 10.1080/1606635310001634537
30. Kolnes L-J, Rodriguez-Morales L. The meaning of compulsive exercise in women with anorexia nervosa: an interpretative phenomenological analysis. Ment Health Phys Act. (2016) 10:48–61. doi: 10.1016/j.mhpa.2015.12.002
32. Long C. Assessment and managem ent of eating disordered patients who over-exercise: a four-year follow-up of six single case studies. J Ment Health. (1995) 4:309–16. doi: 10.1080/09638239550037604
34. Müller A, Zander H, Herberg A, Müller V, de Zwaan M. Does the German version of the exercise dependence scale (EDS-21) measure exercise dependence? Psychol Sport Exerc. (2014) 15:288–92. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2013.12.003
35. Szabo A. Addiction, Passion, or confusion? new theoretical insights on exercise addiction research from the case study of a female body builder. Europe J Psychol. (2018) 14:296–316. doi: 10.5964/ejop.v14i2.1545
39. Szabo A, Griffiths MD, Aarhus Hoglid R, Demetrovics Z. Drug, nicotine, and alcohol use among exercisers: does substance addiction co-occur with exercise addiction? Addict Behav Rep. (2018) 7:26–31. doi: 10.1016/j.abrep.2017.12.001
41. Raichlen DA, Foster AD, Gerdeman GL, Seillier A, Giuffrida A. Wired to run: exercise-induced endocannabinoid signaling in humans and cursorial mammals with implications for the “runner's high.” J Exp Biol. (2012) 215:1331–6. doi: 10.1242/jeb.063677
42. International Classification of Diseases 11th Edition (ICD-11). World Health Organization (2018). Available online at: https://icd.who.int/browse11/l-m/en
43. Schmidt A, Denier N, Magon S, Radue EW, Huber CG, Riecher-Rossler A, et al. Increased functional connectivity in the resting-state basal ganglia network after acute heroin substitution. Transl Psychiatry. (2015) 5:e533. doi: 10.1038/tp.2015.28
44. de la Vega R, Parastatidou IS, Ruiz-Barquin R, Szabo A. Exercise addiction in athletes and leisure exercisers: the moderating role of passion. J Behav Addict. (2016) 5:325–331. doi: 10.1556/2006.5.2016.043
46. Dalle Grave R, Calugi S, Marchesini G. Compulsive exercise to control shape or weight in eating disorders: prevalence, associated features, and treatment outcome. Compr Psychiatry. (2008) 49:346–52. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2007.12.007
47. Davis C, Kennedy SH, Ralevski E, Dionne M, Brewer H, Neitzert C, et al. Obsessive compulsiveness and physical activity in anorexia nervosa and high-level exercising. J Psychosom Res. (1995) 39:967–76. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(95)00064-X
Keywords: exercise addiction, behavioral addiction, review, symptomatology, diagnostic criteria, diagnosis
Citation: Colledge F, Cody R, Buchner UG, Schmidt A, Pühse U, Gerber M, Wiesbeck G, Lang UE and Walter M (2020) Excessive Exercise—A Meta-Review. Front. Psychiatry 11:521572. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.521572
Received: 19 December 2019; Accepted: 26 October 2020;
Published: 20 November 2020.
Edited by:Luigi Janiri, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Italy
Reviewed by:Roser Granero, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Spain
Heather Hausenblas, Jacksonville University, United States
Copyright © 2020 Colledge, Cody, Buchner, Schmidt, Pühse, Gerber, Wiesbeck, Lang and Walter. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Flora Colledge, firstname.lastname@example.org