Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychiatry, 22 October 2021
Sec. Schizophrenia
This article is part of the Research Topic Substance Use and the Psychosis Spectrum View all 11 articles

Problematic Drug Use Among Outpatients With Schizophrenia and Related Psychoses

  • 1Research Division, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore, Singapore
  • 2Department of Mood and Anxiety, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore, Singapore
  • 3Department of Psychosis, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore, Singapore

Background: Problematic drug use is common among psychiatric patients and is linked with poorer course and outcomes of illness. The aim of this study is to assess the prevalence of problematic drug use, and to explore its sociodemographic correlates and associations with health behaviors and outcomes among outpatients with schizophrenia and related psychoses in Singapore.

Methods: Data from 397 individuals who were aged 21–65 years and were seeking treatment for schizophrenia and related psychoses in the outpatient clinics of a tertiary psychiatric hospital were analyzed. The Drug Abuse Screening Test (DAST-10) was used to assess problematic drug use. Information on sociodemographics, smoking status, alcohol use, symptoms severity and quality of life were collected. Multivariable logistic regressions were conducted to explore correlates and associations of problematic drug use.

Results: The prevalence of problematic drug use was 5.8% (n = 23) in the sample, and 10.6% (n = 42) of the participants reported having problematic drug use and/or problematic alcohol use. More males than females reported having problematic drug use (p = 0.021), and also problematic drug and/or alcohol use (p = 0.004). Significant associations were observed between problematic drug use and smokers with nicotine dependence, and with physical health domain of quality of life. Individuals with greater symptom severity were approximately twice as likely to have problematic drug use and/or alcohol use.

Conclusion: While the prevalence of problematic drug use in this sample population is relatively lower compared to other countries, there is a considerable number who might be at risk. Routine screening and close monitoring of drug use is recommended as part of psychiatric assessment, particularly among males and patients with nicotine dependence.

Introduction

Drug use is common among individuals with schizophrenia. The rate of comorbid substance use disorder in persons with schizophrenia ranges widely between 10 and 70%, with variations largely attributed to methodological differences such as study population and variability in definitions of substance use (1). Data from the US Epidemiological Catchment Area Study showed that 47.0% of individuals with a lifetime diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizophreniform disorder met the criteria for any substance use (abuse and dependence), 27.5% met the criteria for any drug (other than alcohol) disorder, and 33.7% met criteria for an alcohol disorder (2). The odds of having these comorbid conditions were three to six times higher among those with schizophrenia as compared to the general population. A case-control study similarly reported higher number of patients with schizophrenia who had problem use of drugs and alcohol as compared to matched controls from the general population (3). More recently, a meta-analysis established a lifetime rate of cannabis use disorder at 27.1% among clinical samples of patients with schizophrenia (4). Drug use contributes to increased risk of psychosis (5) and while for some individuals such substance-induced psychosis could be a transient state, the clinical conditions could persist, mimicking the positive and negative symptoms observed in schizophrenia (6). The transition from substance-induced psychosis to primary psychotic disorder has been reported in the literature (7, 8).

Problematic use of drugs as discussed in this article generally refers to the use of drugs that resulted in physical, psychological, social and legal problems [for definitions, see Refs. (9) and (10)]. It has been linked with poorer course and outcomes for patients with schizophrenia. Drug abuse was a significant predictor of self-harm and suicide among those with schizophrenia (11, 12), and individuals with a dual diagnosis of substance use disorder and schizophrenia reported higher positive and negative symptoms, and were more likely to be medication non-compliant and depressed compared to those with a single diagnosis of schizophrenia (13). A longitudinal study among patients with recent onset of psychosis found that those with persistent use of cannabis had more positive symptoms and a continuous illness (i.e., no remission longer than 6 months) at follow-up (14). Furthermore, substance abuse in patients with schizophrenia was associated with increased rates of hospitalizations, incarceration and use of emergency services, as well as higher treatment expenditure (15, 16).

There is some evidence in the literature showing the effectiveness of treating drug-related problems among patients with a dual diagnosis of schizophrenia and substance use disorder (1719). This included improvements in psychiatric outcomes in areas of global functioning, positive symptoms and quality of life, and in substance-related outcomes in terms of relapse and days abstinent. However, some studies have reported limited evidence on the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions (20, 21), and the absence of high-quality randomized controlled trials precluded definitive conclusions (22). Nonetheless, given the negative outcomes of substance use disorder in patients with schizophrenia and the potential improvement in outcomes with interventions, it remains important to identify the extent of problematic drug use in this population.

Singapore is a multi-ethnic city-state located in Southeast Asia with a resident population of 4.04 million (23). While the lifetime prevalence of schizophrenia and psychotic disorder in Singapore was established at 2.3% in the general population (24), little is known about the prevalence of problematic drug use among those with the condition. In the general population, the total number of individuals arrested for illicit drug use was 3,014 in 2020, a 15% drop from the previous year, and Methamphetamine remained the most commonly used drug (25). To date, only one study has been conducted in Singapore among patients with schizophrenia to examine substance abuse [alcohol and other substances; (26)], and two studies have examined hazardous alcohol use among patients with first episode psychosis, and among a mixed sample of outpatients with schizophrenia and depressive disorders (27, 28). Given the paucity of research particularly on drug use, this study was thus conducted with the aim to (i) establish the prevalence of problematic drug use in a clinical sample of patients with schizophrenia and related psychoses, (ii) identify sociodemographic correlates of problematic drug use, and (iii) explore associations between problematic drug use and smoking status, symptoms severity as well as quality of life.

Methods

Study Design and Sample

The study utilized data collected from a cross-sectional study conducted at the Institute of Mental Health (IMH), a tertiary psychiatric hospital in Singapore. Recruitment of participants took place between October 2019 and March 2021, with a temporary suspension between April 2020 and June 2020 due to a nationwide lockdown in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Face-to-face recruitment and data collection resumed after which, subsequent participants were given the option to complete the study online should they prefer. Participants were outpatients seeking treatment at IMH and were recruited through convenience sampling following referrals from clinicians and other mental healthcare professionals (e.g., case managers, researchers). They were invited to participate in the study if the following inclusion criteria were met: (1) Singapore citizens or permanent residents aged 21–65 years; (2) clinically diagnosed with schizophrenia or having related psychoses, as determined by a psychiatrist following the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV (29) criteria; and (3) able to read and understand English. Prior to data collection, written informed consent was obtained from participants who were recruited face-to-face, while online electronic consent was taken from those who completed the study online. The study was approved by the relevant institutional ethics committee (National Healthcare Group Domain Specific Review Board).

Measures

Drug Abuse Screening Test (DAST)

The DAST-10 is a brief self-reported instrument to assess misuse of drugs, excluding alcohol and tobacco, in the past year (30). Items were given a score of 1 for a “yes” response (except for Item 3 which is reversed scored, where “no” was given a score of 1) to questions related to maladaptive drug use behavior and its consequences (e.g., “Have you used drugs other than those required for medical reasons?”; “Have you neglected your family because of your use of drugs?”), and a total score was obtained by summing items across the scale. The total score can be interpreted as the degree of problematic drug use, with categories reflecting “none” (0), “low” (1–2), “moderate” (3–5), “substantial” (6–8) and “severe” (9–10) level of problems. For this study, a cut-off score of ≥3 was used to index significant problematic drug use as it has demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity in validation studies among psychiatric population (31, 32). The scale showed good internal consistency in this study sample with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.73.

Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND)

Information on smoking behavior was collected by first asking participants if they were current smokers. Those who responded “yes” proceeded to complete the 6-item FTND which assessed physiological dependence on tobacco smoking (33). Items in the scale were summed to yield a total score ranging from 0 to 10. Following studies conducted in the local general population and among psychiatric patients, a cut-off score of ≥5 was used to indicate nicotine dependence (34, 35). Participants were then classified as either “non-smokers,” “smokers without nicotine dependence” or “smokers with nicotine dependence”.

Cut-Annoyed-Guilty-Eye (CAGE)

The CAGE questionnaire uses four items to assess self-reported problems related to alcohol use (36). These items were prefaced by a screening question that asked “Was there ever a period in your life when you drank at least 12 drinks in a year?” Participants who answered “yes” to the screening question completed the four items in the CAGE tool regarding their drinking habits. Endorsing two or more items in the CAGE tool was indicative of problematic alcohol use in this study. Those who answered “no” to the screening or indicated that they had never drunk alcohol were directed to skip the CAGE questionnaire. Participants were thus classified as either “non-drinkers,” “drinkers without problems” or “drinkers with problematic alcohol use.” The tool has been validated (37) and has been used to examine alcohol consumption in the local population (38). A moderate internal consistency of this scale was obtained for this sample (α = 0.69).

Symptoms Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R)

The SCL-90-R is a widely used instrument that provides a measure of psychiatric distress and severity of psychopathology symptoms (39). The checklist consists of 90 items and respondents were asked to rate how much they were bothered by the symptoms in the past week using a five-point Likert scale from 0 = Not at all to 4 = Extremely. Total scores for nine primary symptom dimensions and three global measures of psychological distress can be obtained from the scale. The Global Severity Index (GSI) was calculated by taking the average of all items, with higher scores indicating greater distress and symptom severity. Internal consistency of the scale was high for the study sample (α = 0.99).

World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF)

This 26-item instrument assesses subjective evaluation of personal health and well-being over the past 2 weeks using a 5-point Likert scale (40). It covers four domains: physical health, psychological health, social relationships, and environment. Domain scores were calculated by taking the mean score of items within each domain and multiplied by 4 to transform the value to a 4–20 scale; higher scores reflect greater satisfaction and higher QoL in the domain. The scale has previously been validated in Singapore and has obtained sound psychometric properties (41, 42).

Sociodemographic information including age, gender, ethnicity, highest educational attainment, marital status and monthly personal income [in Singapore dollars (SGD)] were collected.

Statistical Analysis

Descriptive analyses were performed to describe the participant profile. Mean and standard deviations were calculated for continuous variables, and frequencies and percentages were computed for categorical variables. In order to produce more reliable estimates, ethnicity was reclassified as Chinese vs. non-Chinese, and the “primary and below” and “secondary” categories for educational attainment were regrouped as a single category “secondary and below” for subsequent analyses. Independent T-test, Chi-square test and Fisher's exact test were conducted to explore sociodemographic correlates of problematic drug use at a bivariate level. Associations between problematic drug use and smoking status, symptoms severity and quality of life were assessed using multivariable logistic regression. Problematic drug use was treated as outcome variable and symptom severity, smoking status, and quality of life (all four domains) as independent variables. To improve stability of the model and its estimates, sociodemographic variables found to be significant in bivariate analyses were included in the regression model. Noting the relatively low prevalence of problematic drug use in this study sample, the same set of analyses were conducted to further examine correlates and associations with “problematic drug use and/or alcohol use” as the outcome variable. All statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 23 (IBM Corp., Armonk, N.Y., USA), except for Fisher's exact test which was conducted using Stata version 17, and statistical significance was set at p-value <0.05.

Results

Sample Characteristics

A total of 400 participants were recruited for the study. However, three cases were excluded from analysis for the following reasons: (i) one person being enrolled twice in the study, (ii) one participant requested to withdraw from study, and (iii) one participant was above the age limit of the study. The final study sample consisted of 397 participants.

The mean age of participants was 36.2 years (SD = 10.9; Table 1). There was an approximately equal number of male and female participants and the majority of them were Chinese (74.8%) and single (80.6%). The mean SCL-90-R Global Severity Index was 0.94 (SD = 0.9).

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Profile of study sample (n = 397).

Prevalence of Problematic Drug Use and Its Correlates

The prevalence of problematic drug use (DAST-10 score ≥3) in this sample was 5.8% (n = 23; Table 1). Though not meeting the DAST-10 cut-off score, 4.6% of the participants had a low degree of problematic drug use. 5.3% (n = 21) of the study sample reported having drinking problems, and the prevalence of problematic drug use and/or alcohol use was 10.6% (n = 42).

Gender was the only significant correlate found to be associated with problematic drug use at bivariate level (males 8.5% vs. females 3.1%, p = 0.021; Table 2). There were also significantly more males than females (15.1 vs. 6.2%) who reported having problematic drug use and/or alcohol use (p = 0.004).

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Sociodemographic correlates of problematic drug use and/or alcohol use.

Associations With Smoking Status, Symptoms Severity and Quality of Life

Problematic drug use was significantly associated with smoking status. Compared to non-smokers, smokers with nicotine dependence were ~5 times as likely to have problematic use of drugs (OR = 4.79, 95% CI: 1.57–14.61; Table 3). A higher score in physical health domain of quality of life was associated with lower odds of problematic drug use (OR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.48–0.88), while a higher score in the environmental domain was associated with higher odds of problematic drug use (OR = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.01–1.65).

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Associations with smoking status, symptoms severity, and quality of life.

Similar associations were observed between problematic drug use and/or alcohol use and smoking status as well as quality of life. Smokers with nicotine dependence were ~4 times as likely to have problematic drug use and/or alcohol use than non-smokers (OR = 3.81, 95% CI: 1.51–9.61). Higher score in the physical health domain of quality of life was associated with lower odds of problematic drug use and/or alcohol use (OR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.57–0.90), and higher score in the environmental domain was associated with higher odds of problematic drug use and/or alcohol use (OR = 1.26, 95% CI: 1.03–1.53). Additionally, greater symptom severity was associated with increased odds of problematic drug use and/or alcohol use (OR = 1.89, 95% CI: 1.16–3.09).

Discussion

The present study aimed to establish the prevalence of problematic drug use among patients with schizophrenia and related psychoses. It was found that 5.8% of patients surveyed in this study reported misusing drugs in the past 1 year, and 10.6% had problems with drug use and/or alcohol use. Notwithstanding the differences in study methodologies, our finding suggests that problematic drug use is less common among patients with schizophrenia in Singapore as compared to other countries (3, 4).

In general, the use of illicit drugs is lower in Singapore than most other countries, and this largely reflects Singapore's zero tolerance approach to drugs (43) and the success of anti-drug movement in the country. The Central Narcotics Bureau is the primary drug enforcement agency in Singapore and has four main strategies in place to keep the nation drug-free: preventive drug education, rigorous enforcement, treatment and rehabilitation, and aftercare and continued rehabilitation. These efforts are supported by other agencies including the Singapore Anti-Narcotics Association and the Yellow Ribbon Singapore. In the recent years, a rehabilitative and integrative approach toward individuals with drug related offenses has been embraced, and through community-based programs where efforts in early reintegration of these individuals into the community are made (44). Nonetheless, some challenges may remain in drug control and treatment strategies such as a need to focus on familial interventions and more research in the area of drug addiction (45, 46).

Results from the study revealed a considerable number of patients with schizophrenia who may be at risk of significant problematic drug use. Though not meeting the threshold in this study to be classified as having significant problematic drug use, 4.6% of those surveyed had a low degree of problematic drug use (i.e., DAST-10 score: 1–2). It remains that this group should be closely monitored for their drug use and brief counseling may be recommended for them (47). Given that several reasons have been identified for illicit drug use among individuals with psychotic disorders, including social reasons and as coping mechanism for symptoms and side-effects of medications (48, 49), future studies can aim to explore drug use motivations within this at-risk group to effectively intervene at an early stage. Furthermore, understanding the frequency and types of drugs used would be essential. In the local context, the study by Verma et al. (26) found that benzodiazepine was one of the frequently abused substances among patients with schizophrenia and the authors called for caution when prescribing these medications.

Consistent with studies in the literature which identified gender as a significant correlate of substance use (5053), the current study found that more males than females had problematic drug use, and also problematic drug and/or alcohol use. Data from national statistics have shown that there were consistently more males than females who used illicit drugs in Singapore (54). Such a gender disparity could reflect differences in opportunity to use drug rather than vulnerability; males were found to have greater opportunities to use drug, but when once presented with the opportunity, females were as likely as males to initiate drug use (55). While the severity of substance use between both genders might be similar (56), females might be more susceptible to the negative effects of drugs use (57, 58) and also more likely to relapse following abstinence (59). Additionally, males and females with serious mental illness were found to differ in drug use behavior including ways to drugs access and reasons for drug use. Women were more likely to have drugs given to them by a significant other, and to report using drugs to test their ability to control drug use (60). In terms of hazardous alcohol use, several biological risk factors (e.g., genetic risks and gender differences in physiological effects of alcohol) and psychosocial risk factors (e.g., relating to social norms and general roles) have been proposed to account for the gender differences (61). These findings collectively suggest that effective treatment plans targeting problematic drug and alcohol use among patients with schizophrenia and related psychoses would need to consider such gender differences.

In line with studies that established the link between smoking and drug and alcohol use in patients with schizophrenia (62, 63) and also in the general population (64, 65), this study found that smoking behavior in patients with schizophrenia is significantly associated with problematic drug use. Smokers with nicotine dependence were five times more likely to have problematic drug use as compared to non-smokers, and four times more likely to have problematic drug use and/or alcohol use. These findings provided additional evidence of the close association between substance misuse and schizophrenia. Many hypotheses have been proposed to explain for this phenomenon, including common underlying genetic factors that predispose individuals to substance use behavior and schizophrenia, and also the self-medication hypothesis which suggests that patients use substance to cope with their psychiatric symptoms and the side-effects of medications (66). There also exist evidence for the gateway hypothesis which posits that smoking serves as a gateway substance to illicit drug use (67, 68). Given the high co-occurrence of problematic drug use and alcohol use along with nicotine dependence, it is recommended that routine assessments of nicotine use be conducted among patients with schizophrenia and related psychoses to closely evaluate for potential problems with drug use and alcohol use.

This study found that patients with greater symptoms severity were more likely to have problematic drug use and/or alcohol use. A study by Spencer et al. (69) similarly demonstrated symptoms severity as a significant predictor of cannabis or alcohol use among individuals with psychotic disorder, and this was mediated by their motives for using substances; worse symptoms resulted in stronger motives which in turn lead to stronger psychological dependence on substances. It may also be plausible that the problematic use of drug and alcohol contributed to greater symptoms severity. A study among older adults with schizophrenia found that higher levels of alcohol consumption was associated with higher levels of general psychopathology, and among them individuals with comorbid alcohol abuse had more severe negative symptoms and general psychopathology (70). Similarly, in a longitudinal study among persons with psychotic disorder, a reduction in the quantity of alcohol consumed predicted reduction in depressive symptoms, though not with anxiety nor psychotic symptoms (71). However, contradictory findings have been reported in the literature where some patients experienced symptom reduction (decreased anxiety and depression) following alcohol and cannabis use (72), which may in part be due to differences in the types of substance examined and study methodologies.

A significant negative association was observed between physical health domain of quality of life and problematic drug use and/or alcohol use. It may be plausible that patients who perceived poor health from the physical side effects of anti-psychotic medications used illicit drugs or alcohol to relieve such negative experiences (49, 73). It is equally plausible that poor health could be directly attributed to the consequences of misusing drugs (74). Prior studies have similarly reported poorer quality of life among patients with schizophrenia who were current substance users (75) and among those with current stimulant drug use (76). However, contrary to these findings, the study by Herman (77) found that inpatients with comorbid schizophrenia and substance abuse disorder reported better quality of life than those non-substance abusing inpatients. The author attributed this disparity to group differences in terms of lower levels of psychopathology and better executive functioning in the former group. Future studies may look into exploring these clinical variables in understanding the associations of problematic drug use in patients with schizophrenia and related psychoses.

There are a few limitations of this study to be considered when interpreting the results. Firstly, participant's self-reported data was used and thus the extent of problematic drug use could be underestimated due to social desirability bias. However, measures were taken to reduce such bias whereby participants were reassured regarding data confidentiality and were given the privacy to complete the questionnaire on their own. Next, the data collection period overlapped with the COVID-19 pandemic and the demand and supply of illicit drugs could have been affected due to movement restrictions across country borders. This might have influenced the availability and thus frequency of drug use among the study participants. The cross-sectional design of the study limits the ability to draw conclusions on the causal effects of associations examined. Lastly, as participants recruited in this study were outpatients, findings may not be generalizable to inpatient setting where clinical profile of patients differs (e.g., severity of psychotic symptoms, higher comorbidity with substance use) and is likely to influence the prevalence and associations established in this study.

Despite its limitations, this study in many ways contributed to extant literature on problematic drug use among patients with schizophrenia and related psychoses. Most studies have explored substance misuse in psychiatric population and relatively few have focused solely on non-alcohol misuse. Having a clearer differentiation and studying a distinct category of substance misuse allows researchers and healthcare professionals to disentangle correlates and effects of different substances. This study has examined both problematic drug use, and also problematic drug and/or alcohol use among patients with schizophrenia and related psychoses. Given the paucity of related research conducted in Singapore, results from this study can provide valuable insights into drug misuse in the local context and inform healthcare professionals when developing care plans tailored to patients' needs.

Data Availability Statement

Data may be available upon reasonable request and subjected to approval by the institutional review board (IRB). This is a requirement mandated for this research study by our IRB and funders. Requests to access the dataset should be directed to the senior author, Mythily Subramaniam, mythily@imh.com.sg.

Ethics Statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by National Healthcare Group Domain Specific Review Board. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author Contributions

AJ, YM, SV, and MS were involved in the design and conception of the study. SC, AJ, JL, SS, ES, and LC were involved in participant recruitment and data collection. SC undertook the data analysis with assistance from JL. SC drafted the manuscript with supervision from AJ and MS. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

The study was funded through the Singapore Ministry of Health's National Medical Research Council under the Centre Grant Programme (Grant No: NMRC/CG/M002/2017_IMH).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Dixon L. Dual diagnosis of substance abuse in schizophrenia: prevalence and impact on outcomes. Schizophr Res. (1999) 35(Suppl.):S93–100. doi: 10.1016/S0920-9964(98)00161-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Regier DA, Farmer ME, Rae DS, Locke BZ, Keith SJ, Judd LL, et al. Comorbidity of mental disorders with alcohol and other drug abuse. Results from the Epidemiologic Catchment Area (ECA) Study. JAMA. (1990) 264:2511–8. doi: 10.1001/jama.1990.03450190043026

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. McCreadie RG. Use of drugs, alcohol and tobacco by people with schizophrenia: case-control study. Br J Psychiatry. (2002) 181:321–5. doi: 10.1192/bjp.181.4.321

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Koskinen J, Löhönen J, Koponen H, Isohanni M, Miettunen J. Rate of cannabis use disorders in clinical samples of patients with schizophrenia: a meta-analysis. Schizophr Bull. (2010) 36:1115–30. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbp031

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Barkus E, Murray RM. Substance use in adolescence and psychosis: clarifying the relationship. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. (2010) 6:365–89. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.121208.131220

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Martinotti G, De Risio L, Vannini C, Schifano F, Pettorruso M, Di Giannantonio M. Substance-related exogenous psychosis: a postmodern syndrome. CNS Spectr. (2021) 26:84–91. doi: 10.1017/S1092852920001479

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Crebbin K, Mitford E, Paxton R, Turkington D. First-episode drug-induced psychosis: a medium term follow up study reveals a high-risk group. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. (2009) 44:710–5. doi: 10.1007/s00127-008-0490-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Murrie B, Lappin J, Large M, Sara G. Transition of substance-induced, brief, and atypical psychoses to schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Schizophr Bull. (2020) 46:505–16. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbz102

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Schlag AK. Percentages of problem drug use and their implications for policy making: a review of the literature. Drug Science, Policy and Law. (2020) 6:2050324520904540. doi: 10.1177/2050324520904540

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Seddon T. What is a problem drug user? Addict Res Theory. (2011) 19:334–43. doi: 10.3109/16066359.2010.512109

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Haw C, Hawton K, Sutton L, Sinclair J, Deeks J. Schizophrenia and deliberate self-harm: a systematic review of risk factors. Suicide Life Threat Behav. (2005) 35:50–62. doi: 10.1521/suli.35.1.50.59260

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Limosin F, Loze J-Y, Philippe A, Casadebaig F, Rouillon F. Ten-year prospective follow-up study of the mortality by suicide in schizophrenic patients. Schizophr Res. (2007) 94:23–8. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2007.04.031

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Margolese HC, Malchy L, Negrete JC, Tempier R, Gill K. Drug and alcohol use among patients with schizophrenia and related psychoses: levels and consequences. Schizophr Res. (2004) 67:157–66. doi: 10.1016/S0920-9964(02)00523-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Grech A, Van Os J, Jones PB, Lewis SW, Murray RM. Cannabis use and outcome of recent onset psychosis. Eur Psychiatry. (2005) 20:349–53. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2004.09.013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Bartels SJ, Teague GB, Drake RE, Clark RE, Bush PW, Noordsy DL. Substance abuse in schizophrenia: service utilization and costs. J Nerv Ment Dis. (1993) 181:227–32. doi: 10.1097/00005053-199304000-00003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Garnick DW, Hendricks AM, Drainoni M, Horgan CM, Comstock C. Private sector coverage of people with dual diagnoses. J Ment Health Adm. (1996) 23:317–28. doi: 10.1007/BF02522305

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Barrowclough C, Haddock G, Tarrier N, Lewis SW, Moring J, O'Brien R, et al. Randomized controlled trial of motivational interviewing, cognitive behavior therapy, and family intervention for patients with comorbid schizophrenia and substance use disorders. Am J Psychiatry. (2001) 158:1706–13. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.158.10.1706

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Haddock G, Barrowclough C, Tarrier N, Moring J, O'Brien R, Schofield N, et al. Cognitive-behavioural therapy and motivational intervention for schizophrenia and substance misuse. 18-month outcomes of a randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry. (2003) 183:418–26. doi: 10.1192/bjp.183.5.418

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Shaner A, Eckman T, Roberts LJ, Fuller T. Feasibility of a skills training approach to reduce substance dependence among individuals with schizophrenia. Psychiatr Serv. (2003) 54:1287–9. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.54.9.1287

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Baker A, Bucci S, Lewin TJ, Kay-Lambkin F, Constable PM, Carr VJ. Cognitive-behavioural therapy for substance use disorders in people with psychotic disorders: Randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry. (2006) 188:439–48. doi: 10.1192/bjp.188.5.439

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Barrowclough C, Haddock G, Wykes T, Beardmore R, Conrod P, Craig T, et al. Integrated motivational interviewing and cognitive behavioural therapy for people with psychosis and comorbid substance misuse: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. (2010) 341:c6325. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c6325

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Hunt GE, Siegfried N, Morley K, Brooke-Sumner C, Cleary M. Psychosocial interventions for people with both severe mental illness and substance misuse. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (2019) 12:CD001088. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001088.pub4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Department of Statistics Singapore. Population Trends 2020. (2020). Available online at: https://www.singstat.gov.sg/-/media/files/publications/population/population2020.pdf (accessed May 29, 2021).

24. Subramaniam M, Abdin E, Vaingankar JA, Sambasivam R, Zhang YJ, Shafie S, et al. Lifetime prevalence and correlates of schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders in singapore. Front Psychiatry. (2021) 12:249. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.650674

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Central Narcotics Bureau of Singapore. Drug Situation Report 2020 (2020).

26. Verma SK, Subramaniam M, Chong S-A, Kua EH. Substance abuse in schizophrenia. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. (2002) 37:326–8. doi: 10.1007/s00127-002-0553-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Cetty L, Shahwan S, Satghare P, Devi F, Chua BY, Verma S, et al. Hazardous alcohol use in a sample of first episode psychosis patients in Singapore. BMC Psychiatry. (2019) 19:91. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2073-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Subramaniam M, Mahesh MV, Peh CX, Tan J, Fauziana R, Satghare P, et al. Hazardous alcohol use among patients with schizophrenia and depression. Alcohol. (2017) 65:63–9. doi: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2017.07.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders : DSM-IV. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association (1994).

Google Scholar

30. Skinner HA. The drug abuse screening test. Addict Behav. (1982) 7:363–71. doi: 10.1016/0306-4603(82)90005-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Maisto SA, Carey MP, Carey KB, Gordon CM, Gleason JR. Use of the AUDIT and the DAST-10 to identify alcohol and drug use disorders among adults with a severe and persistent mental illness. Psychol Assess. (2000) 12:186–92. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.12.2.186

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Yudko E, Lozhkina O, Fouts A. A comprehensive review of the psychometric properties of the Drug Abuse Screening Test. J Subst Abuse Treat. (2007) 32:189–98. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2006.08.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Heatherton TF, Kozlowski LT, Frecker RC, Fagerström KO. The Fagerström Test for nicotine dependence: a revision of the fagerström tolerance questionnaire. Br J Addict. (1991) 86:1119–27. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1991.tb01879.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Asharani PV, Ling Seet VA, Abdin E, Siva Kumar FD, Wang P, Roystonn K, et al. Smoking and mental illness: prevalence, patterns and correlates of smoking and smoking cessation among psychiatric patients. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2020) 17:5571. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17155571

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Shahwan S, Abdin E, Shafie S, Chang S, Sambasivam R, Zhang Y, et al. Prevalence and correlates of smoking and nicotine dependence: results of a nationwide cross-sectional survey among Singapore residents. BMJ Open. (2019) 9:e032198. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032198

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Ewing JA. Detecting alcoholism: the CAGE questionnaire. JAMA. (1984) 252:1905–7. doi: 10.1001/jama.1984.03350140051025

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Dhalla S, Kopec JA. The CAGE questionnaire for alcohol misuse: a review of reliability and validity studies. Clin Invest Med. (2007) 30:33–41. doi: 10.25011/cim.v30i1.447

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Ong CW, Sagayadevan V, Abdin E, Shafie SB, Jeyagurunathan A, Eng GK, et al. Screening for drinking problems in the elderly in singapore using the CAGE questionnaire. Ann Acad Med Singapore. (2016) 45:456–65.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

39. Derogatis LR, Lazarus L. SCL-90—R, brief symptom inventory, and matching clinical rating scales. In: The Use of Psychological Testing for Treatment Planning and Outcome Assessment. Hillsdale, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. (1994). p. 217–48.

40. Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. The WHOQOL Group. Psychol Med. (1998) 28:551–8. doi: 10.1017/s0033291798006667

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Cheung YB, Yeo KK, Chong KJ, Khoo EY, Wee HL. Reliability and validity of the English-, Chinese- and Malay-Language versions of the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL-BREF) questionnaire in Singapore. Ann Acad Med Singapore. (2017) 46:461–9.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

42. Suárez L, Tay B, Abdullah F. Psychometric properties of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF Quality of Life assessment in Singapore. Qual Life Res. (2018) 27:2945–52. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1947-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Chok S. Singapore's War on Drugs : A Historical Overview. ScholarBank@NUS Repository (2018). doi: 10.25818/3etp-a53b

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Panesilvam L, Silvaraj SI, Binti Haji Mohamed Omar NHB, Binte Sudarmo S, Subramaniam M. Understanding the desistance journey of female drug offenders in Singapore through their lived experiences: the impact of family relationships. Women Crim Justice. (2021) 1–22. doi: 10.1080/08974454.2021.1958730

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Osman MM. Drug and alcohol addiction in singapore: issues and challenges in control and treatment strategies. J Soc Work Pract Addict. (2002) 2:97–117. doi: 10.1300/J160v02n03_07

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Peh ALH, Lim YC, Winslow RM. Addiction in Singapore: changing patterns and evolving challenges. Singapore Med J. (2012) 53:435–7.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

47. Skinner HA. Guide for Using the drug Abuse Screening Test (DAST) (n.d.). Available online at: https://socwel.ku.edu/sites/socwel/files/documents/Research%20Projects/Family%20First/Survey%20Measures/DAST%20Guide%202019%20-%20Remediated.pdf (accessed June 10, 2021).

Google Scholar

48. Asher CJ, Gask L. Reasons for illicit drug use in people with schizophrenia: Qualitative study. BMC Psychiatry. (2010) 10:94. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-10-94

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Charles V, Weaver T. A qualitative study of illicit and non-prescribed drug use amongst people with psychotic disorders. J Ment Health. (2010) 19:99–106. doi: 10.3109/09638230802523039

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Brunette MF, Mueser KT, Babbin S, Meyer-Kalos P, Rosenheck R, Correll CU, et al. Demographic and clinical correlates of substance use disorders in first episode psychosis. Schizophr Res. (2018) 194:4–12. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2017.06.039

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Cantor-Graae E, Nordström LG, McNeil TF. Substance abuse in schizophrenia: a review of the literature and a study of correlates in Sweden. Schizophr Res. (2001) 48:69–82. doi: 10.1016/S0920-9964(00)00114-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Kavanagh DJ, Waghorn G, Jenner L, Chant DC, Carr V, Evans M, et al. Demographic and clinical correlates of comorbid substance use disorders in psychosis: multivariate analyses from an epidemiological sample. Schizophr Res. (2004) 66:115–24. doi: 10.1016/S0920-9964(03)00130-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Moore E, Mancuso SG, Slade T, Galletly C, Castle DJ. The impact of alcohol and illicit drugs on people with psychosis: the second Australian national survey of psychosis. Austral N Zeal J Psychiatry. (2012) 46:864–78. doi: 10.1177/0004867412443900

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Van Etten ML, Anthony JC. Male-female differences in transitions from first drug opportunity to first use: searching for subgroup variation by age, race, region, and urban status. J Womens Health Gender Based Med. (2001) 10:797–804. doi: 10.1089/15246090152636550

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Drapalski A, Bennett M, Bellack A. Gender differences in substance use, consequences, motivation to change, and treatment seeking in people with serious mental illness. Subst Use Misuse. (2011) 46:808–18. doi: 10.3109/10826084.2010.538460

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Gearon JS, Bellack AS. Sex differences in illness presentation, course, and level of functioning in substance-abusing schizophrenia patients. Schizophr Res. (2000) 43:65–70. doi: 10.1016/S0920-9964(99)00175-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Lynch WJ, Roth ME, Carroll ME. Biological basis of sex differences in drug abuse: preclinical and clinical studies. Psychopharmacology. (2002) 164:121–37. doi: 10.1007/s00213-002-1183-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Becker JB, Hu M. Sex differences in drug abuse. Front Neuroendocrinol. (2008) 29:36–47. doi: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2007.07.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Gearon JS, Nidecker M, Bellack A, Bennett M. Gender differences in drug use behavior in people with serious mental illnesses. Am J Addict. (2003) 12:229–41. doi: 10.1111/j.1521-0391.2003.tb00651.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Nolen-Hoeksema S, Hilt L. Possible contributors to the gender differences in alcohol use and problems. J Gen Psychol. (2006) 133:357–74. doi: 10.3200/GENP.133.4.357-374

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Yee A, Bt Nek Mohamed NN, Binti Hashim AH, Loh HS, Harbajan Singh MK, Ng CG, et al. The effect of nicotine dependence on psychopathology in patients with schizophrenia. Biomed Res Int. (2015) 2015:730291. doi: 10.1155/2015/730291

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Ziedonis DM, Kosten TR, Glazer WM, Frances RJ. Nicotine Dependence and Schizophrenia. Psychiatr Serv. (1994) 45:204–6. doi: 10.1176/ps.45.3.204

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Degenhardt L, Hall W, Lynskey M. Alcohol, cannabis and tobacco use among Australians: a comparison of their associations with other drug use and use disorders, affective and anxiety disorders, and psychosis. Addiction. (2001) 96:1603–14. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2001.961116037.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Goodwin RD, Sheffer CE, Chartrand H, Bhaskaran J, Hart CL, Sareen J, et al. Drug use, abuse, and dependence and the persistence of nicotine dependence. Nicotine Tobacco Res. (2014) 16:1606–12. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntu115

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

66. Batel P. Addiction and schizophrenia. Eur Psychiatry. (2000) 15:115–22. doi: 10.1016/S0924-9338(00)00203-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

67. Lai S, Lai H, Page JB, McCoy CB. The association between cigarette smoking and drug abuse in the United States. J Addict Dis. (2000) 19:11–24. doi: 10.1300/J069v19n04_02

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

68. Maldonado-Molina MM, Lanza ST. A framework to examine gateway relations in drug use: an application of latent transition analysis. J Drug Issues. (2010) 40:901–24. doi: 10.1177/002204261004000407

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

69. Spencer C, Castle D, Michie PT. Motivations that maintain substance use among individuals with psychotic disorders. Schizophr Bull. (2002) 28:233–47. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a006934

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

70. Bowie CR, Serper MR, Riggio S, Harvey PD. Neurocognition, symptomatology, and functional skills in older alcohol-abusing schizophrenia patients. Schizophr Bull. (2005) 31:175–82. doi: 10.1093/jschbul/sbi001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

71. Barrowclough C, Eisner E, Bucci S, Emsley R, Wykes T. The impact of alcohol on clinical outcomes in established psychosis: a longitudinal study. Addiction. (2014) 109:1297–305. doi: 10.1111/add.12599

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

72. Dixon L, Haas G, Weiden P, Sweeney J, Frances A. Acute effects of drug abuse in schizophrenic patients: clinical observations and patients' self-reports. Schizophr Bull. (1990) 16:69–79. doi: 10.1093/schbul/16.1.69

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

73. Pettersen H, Ruud T, Ravndal E, Landheim A. Walking the fine line: self-reported reasons for substance use in persons with severe mental illness. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. (2013) 8:21968. doi: 10.3402/qhw.v8i0.21968

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

74. Henry JA. Metabolic consequences of drug misuse. Br J Anaesth. (2000) 85:136–42. doi: 10.1093/bja/85.1.136

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

75. Addington J, Addington D. Effect of substance misuse in early psychosis. Br J Psychiatry Suppl. (1998) 172:134–6. doi: 10.1192/S0007125000297791

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

76. Desalegn D, Girma S, Abdeta T. Quality of life and its association with current substance use, medication non-adherence and clinical factors of people with schizophrenia in Southwest Ethiopia: a hospital-based cross-sectional study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. (2020) 18:82. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01340-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

77. Herman M. Neurocognitive functioning and quality of life among dually diagnosed and non-substance abusing schizophrenia inpatients. Int J Ment Health Nurs. (2004) 13:282–91. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-0979.2004.00346.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: drug misuse, drug use, schizophrenia, DAST, substance misuse

Citation: Chang S, Jeyagurunathan A, Lau JH, Shafie S, Samari E, Cetty L, Mok YM, Verma S and Subramaniam M (2021) Problematic Drug Use Among Outpatients With Schizophrenia and Related Psychoses. Front. Psychiatry 12:762988. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.762988

Received: 23 August 2021; Accepted: 22 September 2021;
Published: 22 October 2021.

Edited by:

Umut Kirli, Ege University, Turkey

Reviewed by:

Giovanni Martinotti, University of Studies G. d'Annunzio Chieti and Pescara, Italy
Massimo Tusconi, University of Cagliari, Italy

Copyright © 2021 Chang, Jeyagurunathan, Lau, Shafie, Samari, Cetty, Mok, Verma and Subramaniam. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Sherilyn Chang, sherilyn_sh_chang@imh.com.sg

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.