Abstract
Background:
Bullying victimization has been associated with depressive symptoms in Chinese university students. This study examined the moderating effect of possible avoidant personality disorder (APD) on association between bullying victimization and depressive symptoms in university freshmen.
Methods:
A total of 1,453 freshmen were recruited from a comprehensive university in Wuhan, China, and administered a self-report questionnaire. The APD subscale of Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire–Version 4 and Beck Depression Inventory were used to measure the presence of possible APD and depressive symptoms, respectively. The moderating effect of possible APD was examined by testing the statistical significance of the interaction between victimization and possible APD in multiple logistic regression analysis.
Results:
The prevalence of depressive symptoms was 24.8%. In multiple logistic regression analysis, the interaction between bullying victimization and possible APD was significantly associated with depressive symptoms (OR: 1.80, P = 0.029). Subsequent subgroup analyses according to the status of possible APD showed that, the victimization-depression association was stronger among freshmen with possible APD (OR: 3.23, P < 0.001) than those without possible APD (OR: 1.82, P = 0.001).
Conclusion:
In Chinese university freshmen, bullying victimization is significantly associated with depressive symptoms, and possible APD magnifies the victimization-depression association. Bullied freshmen, particularly freshmen with possible APD, could be considered as the target group of campus-based depression intervention programs.
Introduction
The transitioning from junior middle schools to universities is challenging for most university freshmen because of difficulties in adjusting to new surroundings, forming new self-identities, forging friendships, gaining independence, and overcoming academic pressure (1, 2). Accordingly, studies have shown the high risk of mental health problems in first-year university students, in particular depression; for example, as high as 35.4–41.4% of the Chinese university freshmen suffer from depressive symptoms (3, 4).
The etiology of depression is complex and multifactorial, and, in the population of university students, commonly reported factors associated with depressive symptoms were female sex, rural origin, low family income, inadequate social support, loneliness, negative life events, academic stress, and certain personality features such as high neuroticism (3–6). Despite extensive research on the epidemiology of depressive symptoms in university students, few studies have examined mechanisms linking these factors and depressive symptoms.
Bullying victimization refers to exposure to aggressive behavior repeatedly and over time from one or more perpetrators who have greater physical or social power than their victims (7). Convincing evidence has shown the causal association between being bullied and mental health problems in children and adolescents including anxiety, depression, non-suicidal self-injury, and suicidal behaviors (8). Although traditional bullying such as verbal and physical bullying is primarily recognized as a public health problem in primary and middle school students, bullying victimization is also prevalent among university students (9). For example, as high as 88.2% of the Chinese university freshmen experienced verbal bullying in the past 12 months and Chinese university students who are bullied are two times more likely than those who are not bullied to have depressive symptoms (9, 10).
The vulnerability–stress model of depression argues that personality interacts with stressors to influence the development of depressive symptoms (11–13). Several subtypes of personality psychopathology have been associated with the increased risk of major depression such as depressive, borderline, and avoidant personality disorders (14–17). In the literature, the mechanisms underlying associations between depressive and borderline personality disorders and depressive disorders have been extensively examined, but the way in which avoidant personality disorder (APD) increases the risk of depression remains poorly understood (18–20).
Persons with APD avoid intimate and social contact with others, are sensitive to negative criticism and rejection, and have a high level of fear of being ridiculed by others (20). Findings from a comparative study have shown that compared to university students without APD, those with APD have significantly lower levels of self-esteem and, therefore, are more likely to experience negative affect (21).
In Chinese universities, although only 0.54–0.66% of the students meet the DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for APD (22, 23), 30.4–33.4% of the students have possible APD, as defined by the APD subscale of Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire–Version 4 (PDQ-4), a widely used screener of personality disorders (24–26). Despite not a clinical diagnosis of APD, possible APD has been found to be a stable personality trait in Chinese university students and the severity of depressive symptoms is significantly associated with the APD subscale score of PDQ-4 in this population (26, 27). Because of the vulnerability of persons with APD, we speculated that Chinese university students with possible APD would experience more depressive symptoms if they were bullied. Since understanding the contextual roles of APD and other personality disorders on the relationship between bullying victimization and depressive symptoms would facilitate the development of campus-based depression prevention programs in Chinese universities, this study examined the moderating role of possible APD on the bullying-depression association in Chinese university freshmen, that is, whether the negative effect of bullying victimization on depressive symptoms differed between students with and without possible APD.
Materials and Methods
Participants
This study was part of a large-scale survey, which investigated mental health, quality of life, and personality among fresh students of a comprehensive university in Wuhan, China, between November and December 2019. Eligible respondents were first-year undergraduates who were of Chinese nationality and voluntary to join the study. We randomly selected seven schools from a total of 19 schools of the university and invited all the freshmen to participate in the survey.
The Ethics Committee of Wuhan Mental Health Center approved the study protocol. All respondents signed the informed consent before the formal survey.
Procedures and Instruments
We used a standardized self-administered questionnaire to gather data on sociodemographics, lifestyle, experience of being bullied, and depressive symptoms.
Sociodemographic factors included sex, age, ethnic group, place of origin (urban vs. rural), living arrangement (with roommates vs. with family members), self-rated family financial status (good, moderate, poor), the only-child status, and marital status of parents (married vs. others).
Lifestyle factors included current drinking and current smoking. According to the official manual of the Chinese Adolescent Health-Related/Risk Behavior Surveillance, current drinkers and smokers were defined as individuals who consumed any alcoholic beverage and smoked at least once in the past month, respectively (28).
Questions for assessing bullying victimization were adapted from previous school bullying studies in China (29–31), which asked respondents about the presence of any one of the seven subtypes of traditional bullying victimization at universities during any time of the past 12 months: “been teased in a mean or hurtful way,” “been asked for money or other possessions in a mean or hurtful way,” “been left out of a group or ignored on purpose in a mean or hurtful way”, “been threatened or intimidated in a mean or hurtful way,” “been hit, kicked, pushed, squeezed, or locked in a mean or hurtful way,” “had sexual jokes or gestures made to you in a mean or hurtful way,” and “had your things stolen or damaged in a mean or hurtful way”.
We used the APD subscale of the validated Chinese PDQ-4 to identify the possible presence of APD among respondents (32). The subscale has seven self-report questions and responses are in a true/false (1/0) format. According to previous studies (24, 33), a total score of four or higher was used to denote possible APD in Chinese university students.
Depressive symptoms were measured with the validated Chinese 21-item Beck Depression Inventory, the Second Edition (BDI-II), which is one of the most widely used scales for assessing the severity of depressive symptoms in both clinical and non-clinical populations in China, including university students (34–36). All BDI-II items use a 0–3 scale to rate the magnitude to which a persons has experienced each depressive symptom during the past 2 weeks. The total score ranges between zero and 63 with a cut-off score of 14 or more denoting the presence of depressive symptoms.
Statistical Analysis
Rates of depressive symptoms were calculated and comparisons between/across subgroups according to sociodemographics were made using the univariate logistic regression analysis. To examine the independent victimization-depression association, a multiple logistic regression analysis was performed, which entered bullying victimization as the main predictor; possible APD, sociodemographic factors, and lifestyle factors as the covariates; and depressive symptoms as the outcome variable (“main effect model”). To test whether the victimization-depression association differed between students with and without possible APD, an interaction term, the production of victimization and possible APD, was included as an additional independent variable in the main effect model (“interactive effect model”). A statistically significant interaction term suggested the presence of the moderating effect of possible APD on the victimization-depression association. Finally, we repeated the above multiple logistic regression analyses within samples with and without possible APD to estimate the adjusted victimization-depression associations in the contexts of the presence and absence of possible APD, respectively. We quantified the factor-outcome association by using odds ratio (OR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI). All statistical analyses were performed by using SPSS 25.0, assuming a two-sided test at the 0.05 level of statistical significance.
Results
Altogether, 1,557 freshmen were invited and 1,453 completed the survey questionnaire (response rate: 93.3%). Among the completers, 868 (59.7%) were boys and the mean age was 20.3 years (standard deviation: 0.9, range: 16–26). The prevalence rates of bullying victimization, possible APD, and depressive symptoms were 39.2, 31.7, and 24.8%, respectively. Other detailed sociodemographic and lifestyle characteristics of the study sample are displayed in Table 1.
Table 1
| Variables | n | Number of depressed students (%) | Univariate logistic regression analysis | Multiple logistic regression analysis | Multiple logistic regression analysis with the interaction term | Multiple logistic regression analysis in sample without possible APD | Multiple logistic regression analysis in sample with possible APD | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Odds ratio (95% CI) | P | Odds ratio (95% CI) | P | Odds ratio (95% CI) | P | Odds ratio (95% CI) | P | Odds ratio (95% CI) | P | ||||
| Bullying victimization × Possible APD | 1.80 (1.06, 3.04) | 0.029 | |||||||||||
| Sex | Male | 868 | 200 (23.0) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||
| Female | 585 | 161 (27.5) | 1.27 (0.99, 1.61) | 0.053 | 1.54 (1.17, 2.04) | 0.002 | 1.55 (1.17, 2.06) | 0.002 | 1.55 (1.17, 2.06) | 0.039 | 1.56 (1.02, 2.39) | 0.040 | |
| Age-group (years) | ≤ 20 | 861 | 216 (25.1) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||
| >20 | 592 | 145 (24.5) | 0.97 (0.76, 1.24) | 0.797 | 0.98 (0.75, 1.28) | 0.877 | 0.98 (0.75, 1.28) | 0.871 | 0.83 (0.58, 1.20) | 0.316 | 1.18 (0.79, 1.77) | 0.417 | |
| Ethnic group | Han | 1,339 | 330 (24.6) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||
| Minority | 114 | 31 (27.2) | 1.14 (0.74, 1.76) | 0.546 | 1.25 (0.78, 2.00) | 0.346 | 1.28 (0.80, 2.04) | 0.306 | 1.64 (0.93, 2.92) | 0.089 | 0.83 (0.38, 1.80) | 0.636 | |
| Place of origin | Urban | 1,050 | 246 (23.4) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| Rural | 403 | 115 (28.5) | 1.31 (1.01, 1.69) | 0.044 | 1.22 (0.88, 1.68) | 0.238 | 1.22 (0.88, 1.70) | 0.229 | 1.22 (0.79, 1.90) | 0.375 | 1.29 (0.79, 2.11) | 0.313 | |
| Living arrangement | With roommates | 1,418 | 349 (24.6) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||
| With family members | 35 | 12 (34.3) | 1.60 (0.79, 3.25) | 0.195 | 1.68 (0.76, 3.71) | 0.201 | 1.67 (0.76, 3.68) | 0.202 | 2.42 (0.93, 6.29) | 0.070 | 0.88 (0.25, 3.11) | 0.843 | |
| Self-rated family financial status | Good | 299 | 75 (24.1) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||
| Moderate | 1,027 | 242 (23.6) | 0.92 (0.68, 1.24) | 0.588 | 1.12 (0.80, 1.55) | 0.518 | 1.11 (0.80, 1.55) | 0.422 | 1.12 (0.70, 1.78) | 0.642 | 1.11 (0.69, 1.80) | 0.671 | |
| Poor | 127 | 44 (34.6) | 1.58 (1.01, 2.48) | 0.045 | 1.64 (0.94, 2.85) | 0.083 | 1.60 (0.91, 2.80) | 0.101 | 1.31 (0.59, 2.92) | 0.513 | 1.98 (0.87, 4.50) | 0.104 | |
| The only child | No | 373 | 92 (24.7) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||
| Yes | 1,080 | 269 (24.9) | 1.01 (0.77, 1.33) | 0.926 | 1.32 (0.93, 1.87) | 0.119 | 1.35 (0.95, 1.91) | 0.094 | 1.30 (0.89, 2.06) | 0.275 | 1.55 (0.90, 2.66) | 0.113 | |
| Marital status of parents | Married | 1,363 | 326 (23.9) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| Others* | 90 | 35 (38.9) | 2.02 (1.30, 3.15) | 0.002 | 1.83 (1.12, 2.99) | 0.016 | 1.87 (1.15, 3.06) | 0.012 | 1.97 (1.04, 3.74) | 0.038 | 1.87 (0.87, 4.02) | 0.108 | |
| Current drinking | No | 884 | 210 (23.8) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| Yes | 569 | 151 (26.5) | 1.16 (0.91, 1.48) | 0.231 | 1.28 (0.97, 1.68) | 0.085 | 1.28 (0.97, 1.69) | 0.08 | 1.36 (0.94, 1.98) | 0.105 | 1.18 (0.78, 1.80) | 0.436 | |
| Current smoking | No | 1,379 | 339 (24.6) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| Yes | 73 | 22 (30.1) | 1.33 (0.79, 2.22) | 0.286 | 1.19 (0.67, 2.11) | 0.550 | 1.21 (0.68, 2.16) | 0.512 | 1.44 (0.69, 3.01) | 0.327 | 0.95 (0.39, 2.29) | 0.901 | |
| Bullying victimization | No | 883 | 159 (18.0) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| Yes | 570 | 202 (35.4) | 2.50 (1.96, 3.19) | <0.001 | 2.39 (1.84, 3.10) | <0.001 | 1.84 (1.29, 2.61) | 0.001 | 1.82 (1.28, 2.59) | 0.001 | 3.23 (2.17, 4.82) | <0.001 | |
| Possible APD | No | 993 | 155 (15.6) | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| Yes | 460 | 206 (44.8) | 4.39 (3.41, 5.64) | <0.001 | 4.20 (3.24, 5.44) | <0.001 | 3.17 (2.21, 4.54) | <0.001 | |||||
Relationships across bullying victimization, possible avoidant personality disorder (APD), and depressive symptoms among Chinese university freshmen.
Others included never-married, remarried, cohabiting, separated, divorced, and widowed.
In both the univariate analysis and the main effect model, both bullying victimization and possible APD were significantly associated with depressive symptoms (OR: 2.50 and 4.39, P < 0.001; OR: 2.39 and 4.20, P < 0.001). In the interactive effect model, the interaction between bullying victimization and possible APD was significantly associated with depressive symptoms (OR: 1.80, P = 0.029). In the subsequent subgroup analyses according to the status of possible APD, the victimization-depression association was stronger among freshmen with possible APD (OR: 3.23, P < 0.001) than those without possible APD (OR: 1.82, P = 0.001) (Table 1).
Discussion
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study in China that examined both the victimization-depression association and the moderating effect of possible APD on the victimization-depression association among university freshmen. Compared to the 8.0% 12-month prevalence of bullying victimization in college students in Changsha, China (9), we found a much higher 12-month prevalence of bullying victimization in university freshmen (39.2%). However, due to the heterogeneity in definitions and timeframes of depressive symptoms, prevalence rate of depressive symptoms in our study are lower than those reported in prior studies (24.8% vs. 35.4–41.4%) (3, 4). Nevertheless, the figure, nearly one-fourth of the freshmen were depressed, still indicates that depressive symptoms are a substantial mental health problem in Chinese university freshmen and there is an urgent need for developing intervention programs to prevent or reduce depression in this population.
In the sample of Chinese university freshmen, we observed significant and independent associations of depressive symptoms with bullying victimization and possible APD, which are consistent with findings from studies with middle school students and other populations (8, 26). The significant victimization-APD interactive effect on depression and greater victimization-depression association in freshmen with than those without possible APD suggest that possible APD magnifies the negative effect of bullying victimization on emotional health in university freshmen. Since the interactive effect was independent from sociodemographic and lifestyle factors, we speculated that some core features of APD may explain the moderating role of possible APD on victimization-depression association. First, social support can buffer the negative effect of a stressful event on the mental health of individuals (37). Because persons with APD avoid social contact with others and are more likely to have insufficient social support to cope with stressful situations, freshmen with possible APD would be more likely to be depressed if they were bullied. Second, persons with APD are overly concerned with “looking foolish” and tend to adopt avoidance coping strategies to deal with stressful situations, so bullied students are more likely to be stressed and depressed if they had possible APD.
This stud has two limitations. First, our assessment of bullying victimization did not include cyberbullying victimization, which is also prevalent and associated with depression in university students (38). So the current study can not examine the moderating effect of possible APD on association between cyberbullying victimization and depression. Second, the sample was selected from a comprehensive university in Wuhan, China, and fresh students from universities of other cities and other categories (i.e., medical) were not included, so there might be selection bias in the study sample. Third, some psychosocial factors associated with depressive symptoms such as social support and possible dependent personality were not measured and included in the adjustment analysis. Further studies are needed to exclude the confounding effects of these unmeasured psychosocial factors.
In summary, in Chinese university freshmen, bullying victimization is significantly associated with depressive symptoms, and possible APD magnifies the victimization-depression association. Bullied freshmen, particularly freshmen with possible APD, could be considered as the target group of campus-based depression prevention programs. In addition, campus-based programs designed to prevent depression in freshmen may include bullying intervention program, psychosocial support, social skills training, and stress management training.
Funding
This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Number: 71774060). The funding source listed had no role in study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the paper for publication.
Publisher's Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Statements
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Ethics statement
The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by Ethics Committee of Wuhan Mental Health Center. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
Author contributions
Y-MX: acquisition and analysis of data for the study, drafting the paper, and interpretation of data for the study. Y-MX and S-SP: design and acquisition of data for the study. YL and B-LZ: drafting the paper, revising the paper for important intellectual content, and interpretation of data for the study. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank all the research staff for their team collaboration work and all the students involved in this study for their cooperation and support.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1.
ZhangCLXuYMZhongBL. The association between smoking and loneliness among Chinese university freshmen. Ann Transl Med. (2020) 8:649. 10.21037/atm-20-3523
2.
LuoWZhongBLChiuHF. Prevalence of depressive symptoms among Chinese university students amid the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. (2021) 30:e31. 10.1017/S2045796021000202
3.
TangWDaiQ. Depressive symptoms among first-year Chinese undergraduates: the roles of socio-demographics, coping style, and social support. Psychiatry Res. (2018) 270:89–96. 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.09.027
4.
YangHChenYQiuY. Epidemiologic survey on the depressive symptoms of college freshmen. Modern Prev Med. (2013) 40:3340–2.
5.
SongYHuangYLiuDKwanJSZhangFShamPCet al. Depression in college: depressive symptoms and personality factors in Beijing and Hong Kong college freshmen. Compr Psychiatry. (2008) 49:496–502. 10.1016/j.comppsych.2008.02.005
6.
Kokou-KpolouCKJumageldinovAParkSNieuviartsNNoorishadPGCenatJM. Prevalence of depressive symptoms and associated psychosocial risk factors among French university students: the moderating and mediating effects of resilience. Psychiatr Q. (2021) 92:443–57. 10.1007/s11126-020-09812-8
7.
PotardCCombesCKubiszewskiVPochonRHenryARoyA. Adolescent school bullying and life skills: a systematic review of the recent literature. Violence Vict. (2021) 36:604–37. 10.1891/VV-D-19-00023
8.
MooreSENormanRESuetaniSThomasHJSlyPDScottJG. Consequences of bullying victimization in childhood and adolescence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Psychiatry. (2017) 7:60–76. 10.5498/wjp.v7.i1.60
9.
YuQWuSTwayigiraMLuoXGaoXShenYet al. Prevalence and associated factors of school bullying among Chinese college students in Changsha, China. J Affect Disord. (2021) 297:62–7. 10.1016/j.jad.2021.10.010
10.
DiYJiangRZhouMWangTHuangY. Retrospective research between bullying behavior and suicidal ideation among freshmen. Chin J Health Psychol. (2012) 20:1260–2.
11.
SokratousSMerkourisAMiddletonNKaranikolaM. The association between stressful life events and depressive symptoms among cypriot university students: a cross-sectional descriptive correlational study. BMC Public Health. (2013) 13:1121. 10.1186/1471-2458-13-1121
12.
HankinBL. Personality and depressive symptoms: stress generation and cognitive vulnerabilities to depression in a prospective daily diary study. J Soc Clin Psychol. (2010) 29:369–401. 10.1521/jscp.2010.29.4.369
13.
Colodro-CondeLCouvy-DuchesneBZhuGCoventryWLByrneEMGordonSet al. A direct test of the diathesis-stress model for depression. Mol Psychiatry. (2018) 23:1590–6. 10.1038/mp.2017.130
14.
ZhengYSeverinoFHuiLWuHWangJZhangT. Co-Morbidity of DSM-iv personality disorder in major depressive disorder among psychiatric outpatients in China: a further analysis of an epidemiologic survey in a Clinical population. Front Psychiatry. (2019) 10:833. 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00833
15.
KonvalinFGrosse-WentrupFNenov-MattTFischerKBartonBBGoerigkSet al. Borderline personality features in patients with persistent depressive disorder and their effect on CBASP outcome. Front Psychiatry. (2021) 12:608271. 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.608271
16.
BagbyRMRyderAGSchullerDR. Depressive personality disorder: a critical overview. Curr Psychiatry Rep. (2003) 5:16–22. 10.1007/s11920-003-0004-6
17.
ZhouYGaoXLiuHXieXXieC. Comorbidity of depressive disorders and personality disorder. Shandong Arch Psychiatry. (2005) 18:17–20. 10.3969/j.issn.1009-7201.2005.01.006
18.
RaoSBroadbearJ. Borderline personality disorder and depressive disorder. Australas Psychiatry. (2019) 27:573–7. 10.1177/1039856219878643
19.
MarkowitzJCSkodolAEPetkovaEXieHChengJHellersteinDJet al. Longitudinal comparison of depressive personality disorder and dysthymic disorder. Compr Psychiatry. (2005) 46:239–45. 10.1016/j.comppsych.2004.09.003
20.
LampeLMalhiGS. Avoidant personality disorder: current insights. Psychol Res Behav Manag. (2018) 11:55–66. 10.2147/PRBM.S121073
21.
YeGYaoFFuWKongM. The relationships of self-esteem and affect of university students with avoidant personality disorder. Chin Mental Health J. (2011) 25:141–5. 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2011.02.014
22.
HuangYLiLLiuXDongWXuY. A cross-sectional study of personality disorder and related risk factors in freshmen of a key science and engineering university. Chin J Psychiatry. (2000) 33:44–6. 10.3760/j:issn:1006-7884.2000.01.014
23.
ChenXXuJWangYWangMGaoHZhouLet al. Epidemiology study on personality disorders of undergraduate students in a Shanghai university. World Chin Med. (2007) 2:208–10. 10.3969/j.issn.1673-7202.2007.04.005
24.
XuSLinWChenTXuJSunQ. A study of grade differences for abnormal personality traits in college students. J Psychiatry. (2015) 28:348–50. 10.3969/j.issn.2095-9346.2015.05.009
25.
LiJZhouD. The distribution and characteristics of students' personality disorder problems in an university. Adv Psychol. (2013) 3:256–61. 10.12677/AP.2013.35039
26.
WangDLiDChenF. The correlation between depressive symptoms and personality disorders in college freshmen. Nei Mongol J Trad Chin Med. (2013) 29:57–8. 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0979.2013.02.067
27.
XuJ. The Longitudinal Study of Personality Traits Among University Students. Nanjing: Nanjing Medical University (2015).
28.
JiC. Adolescent health-related/risk behavior surveillance: an important frontier in school health. Chin J Sch Health. (2009) 30:99–105.
29.
WuPXiaJTangFYanRYangRLvBet al. Experience of being bullied and its association with mental and behaviorial problems in adolescents in Jinshan, Shanghai. Chin J Sch Health. (2019) 40:608–11. 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2019.04.036
30.
LiCZhangJLvRDuanJLeiYLuoDet al. Self-harm and its association with bullying victimization among junior high school students in Beijing. Chin J Sch Health. (2020) 36:884–8. 10.11847/zgggws1123091
31.
ZhaoYZhaoYLiY. Tools for measuring school-bullying: a multi-perspective analysis and selection. J Southwest Univ. (2019) 45:118–24.
32.
YangYShenDWangJYangJ. The reliability and validity of PDQ-4+ in China. Chin J Clin Psychol. (2002) 10:165–8. 10.3969/j.issn.1005-3611.2002.03.002
33.
LiJXiangJ. The application of PDQ-4+ to postgraduates. Chin J Clin Psychol. (2006) 14:580–2. 10.3969/j.issn.1005-3611.2006.06.010
34.
WangYPGorensteinC. Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory-II: a comprehensive review. Braz J Psychiatry. (2013) 35:416–31. 10.1590/1516-4446-2012-1048
35.
YangWWuDPengF. Application of Chinese version of beck depression inventory-II to Chinese first-year college students. Chin J Clin Psychol. (2012) 20:762–4.
36.
JiangYYangW. Factor structure of the beck depression inventory-II of Chinese version among Chinese undergraduates. Chin J Clin Psychol. (2020) 28:299–305. 10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2020.02.017
37.
WangXCaiLQianJPengJ. Social support moderates stress effects on depression. Int J Ment Health Syst. (2014) 8:41. 10.1186/1752-4458-8-41
38.
WangWXieXWangXLeiLHuQJiangS. Cyberbullying and depression among Chinese college students: a moderated mediation model of social anxiety and neuroticism. J Affect Disord. (2019) 256:54–61. 10.1016/j.jad.2019.05.061
Summary
Keywords
bullying victimization, depressive symptoms, avoidant personality, freshmen, China
Citation
Xu Y-M, Pu S-S, Li Y and Zhong B-L (2022) Possible Avoidant Personality Disorder Magnifies the Association Between Bullying Victimization and Depressive Symptoms Among Chinese University Freshmen. Front. Psychiatry 13:822185. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.822185
Received
02 December 2021
Accepted
24 January 2022
Published
17 February 2022
Volume
13 - 2022
Edited by
Liye Zou, Shenzhen University, China
Reviewed by
Lan Xiao Cao, Shenzhen Children's Hospital, China; Chuanjun Zhuo, Tianjin Anding Hospital, China
Updates
Copyright
© 2022 Xu, Pu, Li and Zhong.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Yi Li psylee@163.comBao-Liang Zhong haizhilan@gmail.com
†These authors have contributed equally to this work
This article was submitted to Public Mental Health, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychiatry
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.