Yixuan Liu
Shujuan Yang- Department of Social Medicine and Health Management, School of Public Health, Jilin University, Changchun, China
Introduction: With the rapid aging population, the mental health of older adults is paid more and more attention. Anxiety is a common mental health illness in older adults. Therefore, the study aimed to explore the current situation of anxiety and its factors among the elderly in China.
Methods: Based on the data from 2018 Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey (CLHLS), a total of 10,982 respondents aged 60 and above were selected. Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) scale was used to assess the anxiety. Univariate and multivariate analysis were used to analyze the influencing factors of anxiety. Random forest was established to rank the importance of each influencing factors.
Results: The results showed that the prevalence of anxiety among the elderly was 11.24%. Anxiety was mainly associated with 14 factors from five aspects: sociodemographic characteristics, health status, psychological state, social trust and social participation, among which loneliness related to psychological status was the most important factor.
Discussion: The revelation of this study is that the present situation of anxiety among the elderly cannot be ignored, and it is necessary to take measures to prevent and control it from many aspects.
1. Introduction
In recent years, many countries around the world have experienced a rapid aging population, which has led to growing concern about the public health issues of elderly individuals, both physical and mental health. Similarly, as a country where the elderly comprise approximately 13.5% of its total population (1), China is currently facing the unprecedented challenges brought about by aging.
The pressure of the aging population includes a crushing global burden of disease and a greater demand for health services. In terms of mental health, a large number of studies have shown that more than 20% of elderly individuals suffer from different mental disorders, among which anxiety is one of the most common (2). As the sixth leading cause of disability worldwide (3), anxiety is a negative psychological emotion related to pain and mental discomfort (4). Studies have shown that 15–52% of older adults are affected by anxiety (5). Richardson et al. (6) found that more than 27% of elderly adults experienced anxiety symptoms, which significantly affected their mental health. Maatouk Imad et al. (7) analyzed data of the ESTHER-cohort study and found that the prevalence of anxiety among older adults form southwest Germany was 13.9%. In China, anxiety disorders were the most common class of disorders, with the lifetime prevalence of 7.6% (8). A cross-sectional study conducted among older adults in south China reported the prevalence of anxiety as 7.9% (9). A survey included 4,103 community-dwellings adults aged 60 and older from the West China showed that anxiety were prevalent in 20.8% of all participants (10). Although, the difference in the prevalence of anxiety might be attributed to different time-frame, research designs and studied population (limited by age, region, etc.). To be sure, due to population aging, especially in China, the absolute number of older people suffering from anxiety is increasing, which requires constant attention (11).
Compared with young people, the elderly with anxiety have difficulty paying attention, feel dizzy or faint, and experience nausea or diarrhea when worried, which can ultimately make them face debilitating pain (12). Previous research has indicated that elderly adults may experience decreased self-efficacy because of changes in their daily life and the environment (13). Furthermore, anxiety among the elderly is associated with numerous chronic physical illnesses and other negative emotions (14), such as pain and loneliness. Some studies of older people reported that the risk factors for anxiety involve being female, high neuroticism, hearing/visual impairments, lack of social participation and experiencing negative events (15, 16). By studying the relationship between anxiety and insomnia, Joshua et al. (17) found that anxiety and insomnia may share a common vulnerability to negative emotions, and they may sometimes be risk factors for each other. In summary, there are many factors linked with anxiety in elderly individuals, but the relative importance of these factors is still poorly understood and worthy of further in-depth study.
Anxiety is ubiquitous in elderly individuals, from the perspective of population aging, the pressure caused by anxiety includes the increasing global burden of disease, a greater needs for health services and increased mortality (5, 18, 19). For individuals, the negative outcomes of anxiety include diminished quality of life and well-being, disability, and even more severe physical and mental disorders (20). To prevent anxiety among the elderly, as well as provide meaningful support for subsequent therapeutic interventions, it is necessary to investigate and assess the contributing factors of anxiety adequately.
Most of the existing studies about anxiety among Chinese are based on specific populations [such as children and adolescents (21), some occupational groups (22), or patients with certain diseases (23)], medium sample size (10) (less than 10,000 respondents) and limited sample area (9) (studies are usually conducted in several cities or regions). The research method tends to be traditional logistic regression analysis. Few current studies have delved into anxiety among older adults using nationally representative data. As a machine learning algorithm, random forest is an excellent tool for learning feature representations because of its powerful classification ability and easily interpretable learning mechanism. In recent years, random forest has been widely used in the field of medicine to diagnose and classify diseases (24), predict clinical outcomes (25), and estimate the importance of exposure to pathogenic factors (26). Therefore, this study aimed to understand the prevalence of anxiety among the elderly in China through nationally representative data. Meanwhile, the study also analyzed the factors that may be related to anxiety from multiple perspectives, and measured the importance of these factors by random forest. This can provided an extremely significant reference for relieving anxiety symptoms and promoting overall mental health among elderly individuals.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Study population
The data of this study came from Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey (CLHLS), which is organized by the Center for Healthy Aging and Development Studies (CHADS) of Peking University. Its collection began in 1998 and was followed up in 2000, 2002, 2005, 2008/2009, 2011/2012, 2014, and 2018, covering basic demographic characteristics, social, economic and health aspects. The sampling design of CLHLS adopted a multi-stage disproportionate and targeted random sampling method which makes the sample data representative and reliable (27). The data is nationally representative and has great value in theoretical study. The CLHLS study has got the approval of the Biomedical Ethics Committee of Peking University (IRB00001052-13074). Based on the 2018 CLHLS, the study selected the people aged 60 and above as respondents. We removed samples with answers like “I don’t know,” “I refuse to answer,” “not applicable,” and missing values for key variables. Finally, a total of 10,982 participants were included in the study for analysis.
2.2. Dependent variable
Anxiety was used as the dependent variable in this study. Participants’ anxiety was assessed by the 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) scale translated into Chinese language (28). The scale has been proved to be applicable to Chinese older adults (29, 30). GAD-7 is composed of 7 items, including “feeling uneasy, worried and annoyed,” “can’t stop or can’t control worry,” “is worried too much about all kinds of things,” “is very nervous and it is difficult to relax,” “is very anxious, so you can’t sit still,” “becomes easy to get annoyed or easily irritated,” “feels like something terrible happens.” The options vary from 0 to 3 for each question (0 = never, 1 = for several days, 2 = more than half of days, and 3 = almost every day). The total score ranges from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating more severe levels of anxiety among the elderly. A score greater than 4 was considered significant anxiety symptoms (31). The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient in this study was 0.914.
2.3. Independent variable
In this study, we classified the factors that might be associated with anxiety into 7 aspects: sociodemographic characteristics, lifestyle, health status, psychological state, social trust, social support and social participation. Specifically, the sociodemographic characteristics were as follows: age (0 = 81∼, 1 = 60∼80), gender (0 = male, 1 = female), occupation (0 = agriculture, 1 = non-agricultural), the area of residence (0 = rural, 1 = urban), and self-rated economic status(SRE) (1 = very rich to 5 = very poor). Marital status was coded into the following two categories: 0 = not married (never married, divorced or widowed), 1 = married (married or cohabitating). The form of residence was categorized as “non-alone” (with household member(s) or in an institution) and “alone.” Self-rated quality of life (SRL) and self-rated sleep quality (SRS) were recorded on a five-point scale as follows: 1 = very good; 2 = good; 3 = so-so; 4 = bad; and 5 = very bad.
Lifestyle consisted of current smoking status (0 = non-smoker, 1 = smoker), current drinking status (0 = non-drinker, 1 = current drinker), and current exercise or not (0 = no, 1 = yes).
Health status was assessed through seven areas: (1) Self-rated health status (SRH). Self-rated health status was assessed on a five-point scale: 1 = very good; 2 = good; 3 = so-so; 4 = bad; 5 = very bad. (2) Two-week morbidity. Two-week morbidity was evaluated with the following question: “Have you been feeling not-well within the past 2 weeks?” (3) Number of chronic disease. Total number of chronic diseases was grouped as 0, 1 and ≥2 (32). (4) Sensory impairment was identified including hearing and visual impairment. Hearing impairment referred to both complete and partial loss of the ability to hear. In the questionnaire, the interviewer assessed the hearing function of the respondents by asking them if they have difficulty listening. To assess visual impairment, the interviewer shone a flashlight at the circle on the chart and asked participants if they could see the circle and distinguish the direction of the break in the circle without glasses. There were four options: ➀ can see and distinguish; ➁ can see only; ➂ can’t see; ➃ blind. If respondents chose options 2–4, they were classified as visual impairment. (5) Obesity. According to previous studies and the constitution of Chinese people, waist circumference > 85 cm for males and >80 cm for females was considered as central obesity (33). (6) Activity of daily living (ADL) disability. ADL disability was measured by Katz Index (34), which includes six items: bathing, dressing, toileting, indoor transferring, feeding, control of defecation and urination. The answer of participants for each item was divided into three levels: ➀ without assistance; ➁ one part assistance; ➂ more than one part assistance. Participants who chose either ➁ or ➂ were considered ADL disability. As long as one of the six items was counted as disabled, they were assessed as having ADL disability. (7) Falls. Falls were evaluated through a single question: “Have you fallen in the past year?” The option was “Yes” or “No.”
In terms of psychological state, we applied a question to measure loneliness: “Do you feel lonely?” The scores ranged from 1 to 5, which meant that the lower the scores were, the greater the loneliness. Similarly, social trust was also measured by a five-point question: “Do you often feel that people around you are not trustworthy?” Higher scores indicated better trust in society.
Social participation refers to individuals’ reasonable participation in social activities (35). According to previous studies (30), social participation among the elderly was measured by group activities and self-recreation activities. Group activities were indicated by the following three aspects: outdoor activities (Tai Ji, square dance, visit and interact with friends, other outdoor activities), playing cards or mah-jong and some social activities. Self-recreation activities included garden work, reading newspapers/books, raising domestic animals/pets, watching TV or listening to the radio. The answers were recorded as 1 (almost every day) to 5 (never). We rated 1 to 3 as participating (Yes) and 4 to 5 as little or never participating (No). People who participated in any activity could be regarded as participating in group or self-recreation activities. Social support is divided into formal social support and informal social support. Formal social support refers to social security and social services provided by government agencies, enterprises and communities (36). Informal social support is defined as material support and non-material support provided by family, spouse and friends (37). In this study, social security was evaluated as whether the respondents had medical security (basic medical insurance and commercial medical insurance) and endowment security (including a pension and endowment insurance). We denoted social services using 9 items of services available for the elderly provided by the community: personal care services, home visit services, psychological consulting services, daily shopping services, social and recreation services, legal aid services, healthcare education service, neighborhood-relation services, and other social services. Respondents who answered that their community had one or more of these services were defined as “yes,” otherwise, they were defined as “no.” The study assessed informal social support using intergenerational material and non-material support for the elderly from children and grandchildren. Intergenerational material support was measured as whether respondents had received cash or in-kind contributions from their children or grandchildren in the past year (0 = no, 1 = yes). Intergenerational non-material support was measured by whether the respondents’ children or grandchildren visited or contacted them regularly and provided daily care when the respondents were unwell or ill (0 = no, 1 = yes).
2.4. Random forest
Random Forest is a machine learning method based on a classification tree, which can deal with both classification and regression analysis (38). The basic principle is that the bootstrap repeated sampling method is adopted to randomly extract some observed values of dependent variables from the dataset and select a specified number of variables among independent variables to determine the nodes of the classification tree. Random forest is an ensemble of hundreds or thousands of classification or regression trees that are created from a random selection of samples derived from the training data (39). The out-of-bag (OOB) proportion of the data left over during tree construction is used as validation data to calculate classification errors. The OOB method can be used to measure the importance of each independent variable. The values of each variable in the OOB sample were randomly arranged in turn, and the OOB error was calculated. If the OOB errors increase as the permutation value increases, it indicates that the variable is important. The greater the change is, the more important the variable is to the prediction of the dependent variable (38). In the aspect of evaluating the importance of variables, random forest algorithm estimates the error of the model through the OOB error (unbiased estimation of the prediction error), and the model has strong generalization ability, which makes its prediction results better than other machine algorithms such as back propagation neural networks (40).
2.5. Statistics analysis
IBM SPSS Statistics version 24 and RStudio were used for data analysis. First of all, descriptive analysis was performed on the samples. Chi-square test was used for univariable analysis. Secondly, the factors with statistical significance in univariate analysis were included in binary logistic regression to explore the influencing factors of anxiety in the elderly. In addition, RStudio was used to establish the random forest to evaluate and rank the importance of the influencing factors of anxiety. The level of statistical significance was P < 0.05(two-sided).
3. Results
3.1. Description of the sample
As shown in Table 1, a total of 10,982 respondents were included in this study, among which 1,234 had anxiety symptoms, accounting for 11.24%. In terms of age, 43.1% of the respondents were aged 60–80. The gender ratio was relatively even, with 46.3% males and 53.7% females. More than 70% of the respondents lived in rural areas (77.1%) and worked in agriculture (52.1%) and 47.1% were married. The overwhelming majority of the respondents were “non-alone” (83.3%), meaning they lived with family member(s) or in an institution. Seventy percent of the respondents believed their economic status were at the middle level of society, 70.4% were satisfied with their quality of life, and more than half slept well (52.7%). In terms of lifestyle, a minority of respondents were currently smoking (16.1%) or drinking (15.7%), and 66.4% had the habit of exercise. From the perspective of health status, 48% of the respondents rated their health as “good” or “very good.” In terms of psychological state, 25.4% of the respondents had a significant sense of loneliness, and most of them believed that people around them were trustworthy (74.2%). A number of respondents were involved in some group (66%) or self-recreation activities (78.4%). In addition, various social security and social services provided by the government, enterprises and communities basically covered more than half of the respondents, and most of them also received material and non-material support from their children or grandchildren, accounting for 76.8 and 96.3%, respectively.
Table 1. The demographic characteristics distribution of anxiety among the elderly and univariate analysis.
This study found that the prevalence of anxiety was 11.24%. Compared with participants without anxiety, participants with anxiety were more likely to be older, female, not married, work in agriculture and live in rural areas. At the same time, the distribution of anxiety among the elderly with different characteristics was obtained by univariate analysis, which indicated that all sociodemographic factors and the variables included in life style, psychological state, social trust and social participation were significantly related to anxiety (p < 0.05). In terms of health status, except for ADL disability, the other six factors were significantly related to anxiety (p < 0.05). Regarding social support, only informal social support including intergenerational material and non-material support proved to be linked with anxiety (p < 0.05). Table 1 provides detailed information about the participants’ characteristics in this study.
3.2. Results of binary logistics regression
We further explored the influencing factors of anxiety among the elderly through binary logistics regression. The statistical results were shown in Table 2. According to the odds ratio, the elderly aged 60 to 80 had higher rates of anxiety than those aged 81 and over (OR = 1.621; 95% CI: 1.375, 1.911). Females were more likely to suffer from anxiety than males (OR = 1.503; 95% CI: 1.284, 1.759). People who were married had higher rates of anxiety than those who were not married (OR = 1.309; 95% CI: 1.104, 1.551). The elderly living in urban areas had a lower risk of anxiety than those living in rural areas (OR = 0.784; 95% CI: 0.644, 0.953). The respondents who rated themselves with a poor quality of sleep and life and in poor economic and health status had a significantly higher proportion with anxiety. Two-week morbidity (OR = 1.798, 95% CI: 1.534, 2.108) and falls (OR = 1.383, 95% CI: 1.191, 1.606) were also associated with anxiety. A lower level of loneliness (OR = 0.528, 95% CI: 0.494, 0.565) and a good sense of social trust (OR = 0.791, 95% CI: 0.748, 0.836) appeared to produce a certain protective effect against anxiety. People with hearing impairment were more likely to be anxious than those without hearing impairment (OR = 1.200; 95% CI: 1.034, 1.394). People who participated in group activities had a lower risk of developing anxiety (OR = 0.767; 95% CI: 0.658, 0.894).
Table 2. Binary logistic regression analysis of anxiety in the elderly.
3.3. Results of random forest
To further evaluate the importance of each influencing factor, we coded each factor as V1–V14 and then randomly selected 70% of the overall data as the training set and 30% as the test set to establish a random forest with parameters mtry 3 and ntree 500. The random forest algorithm measures the influence of each variable on the dependent variable by the variable importance score; that is, the greater the average reduction of the Gini index, the more important this variable is (41). Figure 1 and Table 3 showed the ranking results of influencing factors according to the mean reduction of Gini, which indicated that loneliness was the key factor related to anxiety of the elderly, and other influencing factors were ranked in order of importance as follows: SRS, social trust, SRH, SRL, SRE, 2-week morbidity, age, hearing impairment, group activities, gender, marital status, fall, area of residence.
Figure 1. Ranking of the importance of different factors on anxiety among the elderly.
Table 3. The rank of importance of the factors influencing anxiety among the elderly.
4. Discussion
Based on the data from 2018 Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey (CLHLS), this study explored the current situation of anxiety and its influencing factors among Chinese elderly people aged 60 and above. The study found that the prevalence of anxiety was 11.24%, which was consistent with previous studies for Chinese elderly adults (42). Furthermore, a random forest model was established to detect the importance of each factor more clearly. This study has reference significance for further understanding the current situation of anxiety among Chinese elderly individuals, and it also provides certain valuable enlightenment for the prevention of anxiety among the elderly. The crucial finding of this study showed that anxiety was mainly related to five aspects: sociodemographic characteristics, health status, psychological state, social trust and social participation. According to the random forest, loneliness had a great impact on anxiety, which meant that lonely older people were, more likely to become anxious. A longitudinal study among an older Irish population showed that loneliness was predictive of anxiety symptoms (43). As a specific psychological state, loneliness is defined as feelings and thoughts of isolation or disconnection from others (44). In China, the elderly traditionally live with family members, especially their spouses and adult children. However, with the development of urbanization, the traditional extended family is gradually disintegrating (45). Many children are leaving their parents and hometown to live in other cities or regions (46). Although many elderly people can take care of themselves, living apart from their adult children still causes them to feel deep loneliness. In addition, the changes of social roles make the quality of personal relationships among the elderly tend to decline (47). There is evidence that approximately one-third of older people suffer from loneliness at the end of their lives because of lacking family care and emotional comfort (48), while those aged 80 and over report feeling lonely all the time (49). Previous research has indicated that loneliness among older adults is a risk factor for poor mental and physical health outcomes such as anxiety (50). A strong sense of loneliness is generally associated with severe negative emotional states and negative psychological consequences, which can contribute to a wide range of physical and emotional health problems, as in the case of anxiety (51).
Self-rated sleep quality reflects the individual’s subjective perception of their daily sleep, and is also a general indicator widely used in assessment of sleep quality (52). Results from this study confirmed the effect of self-rated sleep quality on anxiety among the elderly. We found that older adults with poor quality of sleep were associated with higher levels of anxiety. Approximately 20−40% of older adults have complained of sleep problems or poor sleep quality (53). Evidence suggested that poor sleep quality negatively affected mental health and was a proximal contributor to individual mental disorders (54). Previous research also found that anxiety and sleep disturbances frequently go hand in hand (55). As a result, when the elderly feel like they are sleeping poorly, anxiety goes with them.
Another interesting finding of this study was that a good sense of social trust could effectively alleviate anxiety among the elderly. In essence, social trust is the embodiment of social relationship. It is a collection of various factors that shape interpersonal relationship, with universality and stability (56). Empirical studies have shown that social trust at the individual level is strongly associated with anxiety (57). Social trust is believed to relieve individual emotional responses to anxiety by increasing perceived or actual social support (58). In China, especially for elderly adults, social trust is mainly reflected in the family or a narrow circle of interpersonal relationships, such as trust in family members, neighbors, and friends (59). Elderly individuals with a good sense of social trust have the lower likelihood of reporting anxiety, because they can obtain more information and emotional support from the person around them to handle problems, which, in turn, reduces anxiety (60). Moreover, there is evidence that people with higher levels of social trust are more likely to report good health, which plays a protective role in reducing anxiety (61). To a certain extent, a higher level of social trust could protect the elderly from the adverse impact of negative emotion by acting as a “buffer” and preventing development of anxiety.
In addition to the above three most important factors related to anxiety among the elderly, we also found that the impact of health-related factors on anxiety was also noteworthy. The study showed that people with a lower level of self-rated health had a higher risk of anxiety. Similarly, 2-week morbidity, hearing impairment and falls may also cause anxiety. There is evidence that people may fear the potential consequences of poor health status, which would trigger the development of anxiety (62). As a means of measuring health status, SRH and 2-week morbidity are important predictors of anxiety. Hearing impairment and falls mean limited mobility and reduced independence. It is likely to erode older adults’ overall self-efficacy and aggravate their anxiety and uncertainty about life (63). In a word, all of these risk factors may increase the level of anxiety in older adults.
The study also proved that SRL and SRE were linked with anxiety among the elderly (ranked fourth and fifth in terms of importance). SRL and SRE can be regarded as people’s subjective evaluation of the quality of life and economic situation. The negative correlation between quality of life and anxiety has been well confirmed in many studies (64, 65). Previous studies have shown that lower quality of life was predictive of negative mental health outcomes (66). Likewise, it was also previously established that economic status has an impact on mental health through the material and psychosocial pathways (67). Higher economic status is associated with more affluent material conditions, which reduces the psychosocial stress caused by financial hardship (68). Compared with counterparts, people with low economic status are more likely to be affected by mental disorders such as anxiety due to their reduced self-esteem and increased life pressures (69). Past research has shown that the distinguishing characteristics among many patients diagnosed with anxiety include low income levels and economic status (70). Most elderly people have experienced changes in their social and life roles, which can affect their quality of life and financial situation. The elderly with lower life quality or economic status are more prone to mental health problems such as anxiety (71). Moreover, some sociodemographic characteristics (age, gender, marital status, and the area of residence) have also been found to have a certain influence on anxiety among the elderly. As people grow older and their life cycle draws to its close, some older adults find themselves unable to accept the death and illness of spouses or peers. They feel anxious about facing the increasing health limitations and their own impending death (72). In terms of gender, females have a higher prevalence of anxiety disorders than males, which can be attributed to the fact that females are more vulnerable to negative emotions (73). At the same time, there are the benefits of a supportive partner, which also have a positive effect on the elderly’s psychological wellbeing (74). The relatively higher socioeconomic status, accessible health-care services and adequate social basic resources for the Chinese urban elderly can make up for negative feelings and reduce anxiety compared to their rural counterparts (75). Regarding the role of social participation, participation in group activities could reduce the risk of anxiety. The reason is that participation in group social activities increases more opportunities of communication with others and emotional catharsis, which significantly reduces the feeling of anxiety among the elderly (29).
5. Limitations
The results of this study are based on cross-sectional data, and it is difficult to infer causality, which should be further verified by longitudinal studies. In addition, the study only explored the relationship between loneliness and anxiety. More measures of other psychological state should be introduced in the future. Finally, some variables were evaluated by single or self-reported items. The participants’ subjective awareness may affect the authenticity of the measurement results. In future research, enriching the diversity and objectivity of indicators will better guarantee the quality of the study.
6. Conclusion
In this study, we explored the prevalence of anxiety among elderly people aged 60 and above and analyzed the importance of various influencing factors of anxiety using random forest model. According to the results, loneliness, self-rated sleep quality and social trust had a great impact on anxiety, followed by self-rated health status, self-rated quality of life, self-rated economic status, 2-week morbidity, age, hearing impairment, group activities, gender, marital status, fall and area of residence. Based on this, we call on the whole society to pay attention to the mental health of the elderly. Relevant departments and policy-makers should formulate targeted actions to improve the health literacy of the elderly, such as carrying out health education, providing emotional care for lonely elderly group, encouraging the elderly to participate in social activities and enriching their interpersonal relationship, improving regional infrastructure and increasing social welfare and living standards of elderly individuals. These measures are meaningful to attenuate the impact of negative emotions such as anxiety and maintain the psychological health of the elderly.
Data availability statement
Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study. This data can be found here: https://opendata.pku.edu.cn/dataverse/CHADS.
Ethics statement
The CLHLS has been approved by the research ethics committees of Peking University (IRB00001052-13074). Written informed consent was not required as per local legislation and institutional requirements.
Author contributions
SY: conceptualization, validation, and writing — original draft. YL: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, and writing — review and editing. YX and XY: formal analysis and writing — review and editing. GM and YW: editing. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful for the data provided by the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey (CLHLS).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. National Bureau of Statistics. A main data of the seventh national census. (2021). Available online at: http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/tjgb/rkpcgb/qgrkpcgb/202106/t20210628_1818824.html (accessed July 18, 2022).
2. Manaf MR, Mustafa M, Rahman MR, Yusof KH, Aziz NA. Factors influencing the prevalence of mental health problems among malay elderly residing in a rural community: a cross-sectional study. PLoS One. (2016) 11:e0156937. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156937
3. Baxter AJ, Vos T, Scott KM, Ferrari AJ, Whiteford HA. The global burden of anxiety disorders in 2010. Psychol Med. (2014) 44:2363–74. doi: 10.1017/S0033291713003243
4. Ollonen P, Lehtonen J, Eskelinen M. Anxiety, depression, and the history of psychiatric symptoms in patients with breast disease: a prospective case-control study in Kuopio, Finland. Anticancer Res. (2005) 25:2527–33.
5. Ryan J, Scali J, Carrière I, Scarabin P, Ritchie K, Ancelin M. Estrogen receptor gene variants are associated with anxiety disorders in older women. Psychoneuroendocrinology. (2011) 36:1582–6. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2011.04.011
6. Richardson TM, Simning A, He H, Conwell Y. Anxiety and its correlates among older adults accessing aging services. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. (2011) 26:31–8. doi: 10.1002/gps.2474
7. Maatouk I, Herzog W, Böhlen F, Quinzler R, Löwe B, Saum K, et al. Association of hypertension with depression and generalized anxiety symptoms in a large population-based sample of older adults. J Hypertens. (2016) 34:1711–20. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001006
8. Huang Y, Wang Y, Wang H, Liu Z, Yu X, Yan J, et al. Prevalence of mental disorders in China: a cross-sectional epidemiological study. Lancet Psychiatry. (2019) 6:211–24. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30511-X
9. Ding K, Wang S, Xu W, Lin L, Liao D, Chen H, et al. Low mental health literacy and its association with depression, anxiety and poor sleep quality in Chinese elderly. Asia Pac Psychiatry. (2022) 14:e12520. doi: 10.1111/appy.12520
10. Zhao W, Zhang Y, Liu X, Yue J, Hou L, Xia X, et al. Comorbid depressive and anxiety symptoms and frailty among older adults: findings from the West China health and aging trend study. J Affect Disord. (2020) 277:970–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.08.070
11. Rechel B, Grundy E, Robine J, Cylus J, Mackenbach JP, Knai C, et al. Ageing in the European union. Lancet. (2013) 381:1312–22. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62087-X
12. Gonçalves DC, Byrne GJ. Who worries most? Worry prevalence and patterns across the lifespan. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. (2013) 28:41–9. doi: 10.1002/gps.3788
13. Cybulski M, Cybulski L, Krajewska-Kulak E, Cwalina U. The level of emotion control, anxiety, and self-efficacy in the elderly in Bialystok, Poland. Clin Interv Aging. (2017) 12:305–14. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S128717
14. Vancampfort D, Koyanagi A, Hallgren M, Probst M, Stubbs B. The relationship between chronic physical conditions, multimorbidity and anxiety in the general population: a global perspective across 42 countries. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. (2017) 45:1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2016.11.002
15. de Beurs E, Beekman AT, Deeg DJ, Dyck RV, Tilburg W v. Predictors of change in anxiety symptoms of older persons: results from the longitudinal aging study Amsterdam. Psychol Med. (2000) 30:515–27. doi: 10.1017/S0033291799001956
16. Santabárbara J, Villagrasa B, Lopez-Anton R, De la Cámara C, Gracia-García P, Lobo A. Anxiety and risk of vascular dementia in an elderly community sample: the role of sex. Brain Sci. (2020) 10:265. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10050265
17. Magee JC, Carmin CN. The relationship between sleep and anxiety in older adults. Curr Psychiatry Rep. (2010) 12:13–9. doi: 10.1007/s11920-009-0087-9
18. Bergua V, Meillon C, Potvin O, Bouisson J, Goff ML, Rouaud O, et al. The STAI-Y trait scale: psychometric properties and normative data from a large population-based study of elderly people. Int Psychogeriatr. (2012) 24:1163–71. doi: 10.1017/S1041610212000300
19. Mohammadpourhodki R, Sargolzaei MS, Basirinezhad MH. Evaluating the effect of massage based on slow stroke back massage on the anxiety of candidates for cataract surgery. Rom J Ophthalmol. (2019) 63:146–52. doi: 10.22336/rjo.2019.22
20. Xu W, Lin L, Ding K, Ke Y, Huang J, Hou C, et al. The role of depression and anxiety in the relationship between poor sleep quality and subjective cognitive decline in Chinese elderly: exploring parallel, serial, and moderated mediation. J Affect Disord. (2021) 294:464–71. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.07.063
21. Shao R, He P, Ling B, Tan L, Xu L, Hou Y, et al. Prevalence of depression and anxiety and correlations between depression, anxiety, family functioning, social support and coping styles among Chinese medical students. BMC Psychol. (2020) 8:38. doi: 10.1186/s40359-020-00402-8
22. Xi X, Lu Q, Wo T, Pei P, Lin G, Hu H, et al. Doctor’s presenteeism and its relationship with anxiety and depression: a cross-sectional survey study in China. BMJ Open. (2019) 9:e028844. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028844
23. Zhai X, Yu J, Ma Y, Xiang S, Li G, He C, et al. Prevalence of and risk factors for anxiety and depression in Chinese patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms treated by endovascular intervention. BMC Psychiatry. (2020) 20:430. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02834-3
24. Asadi S, Roshan S, Kattan MW. Random forest swarm optimization-based for heart diseases diagnosis. J Biomed Inform. (2021) 115:103690. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2021.103690
25. Yang L, Wu H, Jin X, Zheng P, Hu S, Xu X, et al. Study of cardiovascular disease prediction model based on random forest in eastern China. Sci Rep. (2020) 10:5245. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-62133-5
26. Andraud M, Bougeard S, Chesnoiu T, Rose N. Spatiotemporal clustering and random forest models to identify risk factors of African swine fever outbreak in Romania in 2018-2019. Sci Rep. (2021) 11:2098. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-81329-x
27. Zeng Y, Chen H, Shi X, Yin Z, Yang Z, Gu J, et al. Health consequences of familial longevity influence among the Chinese elderly. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. (2013) 68:473–82. doi: 10.1093/gerona/gls203
28. Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Löwe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. (2006) 166:1092–7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092
29. Li W, Sun H, Xu W, Ma W, Yuan X, Wu H, et al. Leisure activity and cognitive function among Chinese old adults: the multiple mediation effect of anxiety and loneliness. J Affect Disord. (2021) 294:137–42. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.07.051
30. Yue Z, Liang H, Gao X, Qin X, Li H, Xiang N, et al. The association between falls and anxiety among elderly Chinese individuals: the mediating roles of functional ability and social participation. J Affect Disord. (2022) 301:300–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.01.070
31. Crockett MA, Martínez V, Ordóñez-Carrasco JL. [Psychometric properties of the generalized anxiety disorder 7-item (GAD-7) scale in Chilean adolescents]. Rev Med Chile. (2022) 150:458–64. doi: 10.4067/S0034-98872022000400458
32. Zhang Y, Ge M, Zhao W, Liu Y, Xia X, Hou L, et al. Sensory impairment and all-cause mortality among the oldest-old: findings from the Chinese longitudinal healthy longevity survey (CLHLS). J Nutr Health Aging. (2020) 24:132–7. doi: 10.1007/s12603-020-1319-2
33. Liu Z, Yang H, Chen S, Cai J, Huang Z. The association between body mass index, waist circumference, waist-hip ratio and cognitive disorder in older adults. J Public Health. (2019) 41:305–12. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdy121
34. Katz S, Ford AB, Moskowitz RW, Jackson BA, Jaffe MW, et al. Studies of illness in the aged. The index of adl: a standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. JAMA. (1963) 185:914–9. doi: 10.1001/jama.1963.03060120024016
35. Hsu HC. Does social participation by the elderly reduce mortality and cognitive impairment? Aging Ment Health. (2007) 11:699–707. doi: 10.1080/13607860701366335
36. Fan X, Guo X, Ren Z, Li X, He M, Shi H, et al. The prevalence of depressive symptoms and associated factors in middle-aged and elderly Chinese people. J Affect Disord. (2021) 293:222–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.06.044
37. Li C, Jiang S, Zhang X. Intergenerational relationship, family social support, and depression among Chinese elderly: a structural equation modeling analysis. J Affect Disord. (2019) 248:73–80. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.01.032
38. Grekousis G, Feng Z, Marakakis I, Lu Y, Wang R. Ranking the importance of demographic, socioeconomic, and underlying health factors on US COVID-19 deaths: a geographical random forest approach. Health Place. (2022) 74:102744. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2022.102744
39. Kanerva N, Kontto J, Erkkola M, Nevalainen J, Männist S. Suitability of random forest analysis for epidemiological research: exploring sociodemographic and lifestyle-related risk factors of overweight in a cross-sectional design. Scand J Public Health. (2018) 46:557–64. doi: 10.1177/1403494817736944
40. Breiman L. Random forests, machine learning 45. J Clin Microbiol. (2001) 2:199–228. doi: 10.1023/A:1010933404324
41. Groemping U. Variable importance assessment in regression: linear regression versus random forest. Am Stat. (2009) 63:308–19. doi: 10.1198/tast.2009.08199
42. Wu Y, Tao Z, Qiao Y, Chai Y, Liu Q, Lu Q, et al. Prevalence and characteristics of somatic symptom disorder in the elderly in a community-based population: a large-scale cross-sectional study in China. BMC Psychiatry. (2022) 22:257. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-03907-1
43. Domènech-Abella J, Mundó J, Haro JM, Rubio-Valera M, et al. Anxiety, depression, loneliness and social network in the elderly: longitudinal associations from the irish longitudinal study on ageing (TILDA). J Affect Disord. (2019) 246:82–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.12.043
44. Wang G, Zhang X, Wang K, Li Y, Shen Q, Ge X, et al. Loneliness among the rural older people in Anhui, China: prevalence and associated factors. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. (2011) 26:1162–8. doi: 10.1002/gps.2656
45. Wang G, Hu M, Xiao S, Zhou L. Loneliness and depression among rural empty-nest elderly adults in Liuyang, China: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. (2017) 7:e016091. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016091
46. He W, Jiang L, Ge X, Ye J, Yang N, Li M, et al. Quality of life of empty-nest elderly in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol Health Med. (2020) 25:131–47. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2019.1695863
47. Victor CR, Bowling A. A longitudinal analysis of loneliness among older people in Great Britain. J Psychol. (2012) 146:313–31. doi: 10.1080/00223980.2011.609572
48. Yan Z, Yang X, Wang L, Zhao Y, Yu L. Social change and birth cohort increase in loneliness among Chinese older adults: a cross-temporal meta-analysis, 1995-2011. Int Psychogeriatr. (2014) 26:1773–81. doi: 10.1017/S1041610214000921
49. Dykstra PA. Older adult loneliness: myths and realities. Eur J Ageing. (2009) 6:91–100. doi: 10.1007/s10433-009-0110-3
50. Holt-Lunstad J, Smith TB, Baker M, Harris T, Stephenson D. Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for mortality: a meta-analytic review. Perspect Psychol Sci. (2015) 10:227–37. doi: 10.1177/1745691614568352
51. Hawkley LC, Cacioppo JT. Loneliness matters: a theoretical and empirical review of consequences and mechanisms. Ann Behav Med. (2010) 40:218–27. doi: 10.1007/s12160-010-9210-8
52. Li MC, Wang N, Dupre ME. Association between the self-reported duration and quality of sleep and cognitive function among middle-aged and older adults in China. J Affect Disord. (2022) 304:20–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.02.039
53. Morin CM, Jarrin DC. Epidemiology of insomnia: prevalence, course, risk factors, and public health burden. Sleep Med Clin. (2022) 17:173–91. doi: 10.1016/j.jsmc.2022.03.003
54. Short NA, Ennis CR, Oglesby ME, Boffa JW, Joiner TE, Schmidt NB. The mediating role of sleep disturbances in the relationship between posttraumatic stress disorder and self-injurious behavior. J Anxiety Disord. (2015) 35:68–74. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2015.09.004
55. Mehta KM, Simonsick EM, Penninx BW, Schulz R, Rubin SM, Satterfield S, et al. Prevalence and correlates of anxiety symptoms in well-functioning older adults: findings from the health aging and body composition study. J Am Geriatr Soc. (2003) 51:499–504. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2003.51158.x
56. Silva MJ, McKenzie K, Harpham T, Huttly SR. Social capital and mental illness: a systematic review. J Epidemiol Community Health. (2005) 59:619–27. doi: 10.1136/jech.2004.029678
57. Silva MJ, Huttly SR, Harpham T, Kenward MG. Social capital and mental health: a comparative analysis of four low income countries. Soc Sci Med. (2007) 64:5–20. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.08.044
58. Jhang FH. Changes in trust and trait anxiety: the mediating role of changes in self-rated health among older adults in Taiwan. Geriatr Gerontol Int. (2020) 20:833–8. doi: 10.1111/ggi.13981
59. Fukuyama F. Social capital, civil society and development. Third World Q. (2001) 22:7–20. doi: 10.1080/713701144
60. Musalia J. Social capital and health in Kenya: a multilevel analysis. Soc Sci Med. (2016) 167:11–9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.08.043
61. Nakamine S, Tachikawa H, Aiba M, Takahashi S, Noguchi H, Takahashi H, et al. Changes in social capital and depressive states of middle-aged adults in Japan. PLoS One. (2017) 12:e0189112. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189112
62. Zhang YX, Chen YJ, Ma LN. Depression and cardiovascular disease in elderly: current understanding. J Clin Neurosci. (2018) 47:1–5. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2017.09.022
63. Ward-Griffin C, Hobson S, Melles P, Kloseck M, Vandervoort A, Crilly R. Falls and fear of falling among community-dwelling seniors: the dynamic tension between exercising precaution and striving for independence. Can J Aging. (2004) 23:307–18. doi: 10.1353/cja.2005.0028
64. Olatunji BO, Cisler JM, Tolin DF. Quality of life in the anxiety disorders: a meta-analytic review. Clin Psychol Rev. (2007) 27:572–81. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2007.01.015
65. Mogotsi M, Kaminer D, Stein DJ. Quality of life in the anxiety disorders. Harv Rev Psychiatry. (2000) 8:273–82. doi: 10.1080/hrp.8.6.273
66. Hoertel N, Blanco C, Oquendo MA, Wall MM, Olfson M, Falissard B, et al. A comprehensive model of predictors of persistence and recurrence in adults with major depression: results from a national 3-year prospective study. J Psychiatr Res. (2017) 95:19–27. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2017.07.022
67. Said MA, Thangiah G, Majid HA, Ismail R, Pin TM, Rizal H, et al. Income disparity and mental wellbeing among adults in semi-urban and rural areas in Malaysia: the mediating role of social capital. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2022) 19:6604. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19116604
68. Golberstein E. The effects of income on mental health: evidence from the social security notch. J Ment Health Policy Econ. (2015) 18:27–37.
69. Sareen J, Afifi TO, McMillan KA, Asmundson GJ. Relationship between household income and mental disorders: findings from a population-based longitudinal study. Arch Gen Psychiatry. (2011) 68:419–27. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.15
70. Mojtabai R, Stuart EA, Hwang I, Susukida R, Eaton WW, Sampson N, et al. Long-term effects of mental disorders on employment in the national comorbidity survey ten-year follow-up. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. (2015) 50:1657–68. doi: 10.1007/s00127-015-1097-z
71. Fergusson DM, McLeod GF, Horwood LJ, Swain NR, Chapple S, Poulton R. Life satisfaction and mental health problems (18 to 35 years). Psychol Med. (2015) 45:2427–36. doi: 10.1017/S0033291715000422
72. Roest AM, Zuidersma M, de Jonge P. Myocardial infarction and generalised anxiety disorder: 10-year follow-up. Br J Psychiatry. (2012) 200:324–9. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.111.103549
73. Kiely KM, Brady B, Byles J. Gender, mental health and ageing. Maturitas. (2019) 129:76–84. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2019.09.004
74. Taqui AM, Itrat A, Qidwai W, Qadri Z. Depression in the elderly: does family system play a role? A cross-sectional study. BMC Psychiatry. (2007) 7:57. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-7-57
Keywords: anxiety, influencing factors, random forest, mental health, aging
Citation: Liu Y, Xu Y, Yang X, Miao G, Wu Y and Yang S (2023) The prevalence of anxiety and its key influencing factors among the elderly in China. Front. Psychiatry 14:1038049. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1038049
Received: 06 September 2022; Accepted: 17 January 2023;
Published: 02 February 2023.
Edited by:
Marco Grados, Johns Hopkins University, United StatesReviewed by:
Lin Chen, Beijing Normal University, Zhuhai, ChinaŞenol Turan, İstanbul Üniversitesi-Cerrahpaşa, Türkiye
Copyright © 2023 Liu, Xu, Yang, Miao, Wu and Yang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Shujuan Yang, 
ysj@jlu.edu.cn