Skip to main content

CLINICAL TRIAL article

Front. Psychiatry, 19 January 2024
Sec. Mood Disorders
This article is part of the Research Topic Chronic insomnia: Treatment and management View all 8 articles

Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy improves insomnia symptoms in individuals with recurrent depression: secondary analyses from a randomized controlled trial

  • 1Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
  • 2Department of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
  • 3Department of Biological and Medical Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway

Background: Embedded within a randomized efficacy trial, the present study aimed to investigate whether mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) for recurrent depression improved symptoms of insomnia.

Methods: Sixty-eight remitted participants with at least three prior episodes of depression were randomized to 8 weeks of MBCT (n = 33) or a waitlist control condition (n = 35). The Bergen Insomnia Scale was used to screen for insomnia symptoms before and after the intervention. The analyses were conducted using one-way between-groups analyses of covariance.

Results: Twenty-five MBCT participants and 30 waitlist controls completed the study (74.5% females; mean age 40.7 ± 12.9 years). At baseline, 83.6% screened positive for the insomnia diagnosis. Following the intervention and after controlling for corresponding insomnia parameters at baseline, MBCT completers reported significantly less severe insomnia symptoms (p = 0.017), as well as less problems with prolonged sleep onset (p = 0.047) and nocturnal awakenings (p = 0.023), relative to controls. No group differences were found on early morning awakening, daytime impairment, or dissatisfaction with sleep.

Conclusion: The results suggest that MBCT improves certain insomnia symptoms. However, additional sleep-specific interventions may be needed to further improve this population’s sleep.

Clinical Trial Registration: ISRCTN, ISRCTN18001392, registered 22/11/2018. URL: 10.1186/ISRCTN18001392.

1 Introduction

Recurrent depressive disorder, broadly defined as an episode of major depression disorder (MDD) along with a history of at least one previous depressive episode, is a highly prevalent, chronic, and often disabling mental health disorder (16). Depression has been associated with numerous adverse outcomes, including increased risk of medical and psychiatric conditions (7, 8) and increased societal costs (9). It is therefore important, both for the suffering individual and in societal terms, to reduce the rate of recurring MDD cases (10).

It is well-established that many patients with depression also suffer from insomnia, and that the two disorders are bidirectionally related (1113). Insomnia is a subjective sleep disorder characterized by problems initiating or maintaining sleep, or insufficient sleep quality (1, 11). To qualify for the chronic insomnia diagnosis, the International Classification of Sleep Disorders requires that at least one of the above sleep symptoms, along with daytime impairments (e.g., cognitive, social or occupational) and/or sleep-related worry, must have been present for at least three times per week for 3 months (11). Insomnia co-occurring with depression was previously assumed to be secondary to (i.e., a symptom of) the depressed state (12), and has consequently received little attention in the treatment context of MDD (10, 13). However, the past decades has recognized insomnia as a separate psychological disorder that in many cases develops prior to depression (14) and, once established, increases the risk of depressive relapse and recurrence (10, 1517). Such findings, along with the tendency of insomnia to persist if left untreated (18), indicate that treating co-existing insomnia may be essential to ensure long-term recovery from depression (10, 19, 20).

Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) (21) is effective in reducing the risk of depressive relapse and recurrence (2224), and is therefore recommended by the UK National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence for the treatment of recurrent MDD (25). However, despite of evidence that insomnia may predict relapse and recurrence of MDD, few previous studies have investigated MBCT’s potential effects on insomnia (26, 27). Consequently, it is unclear whether recurrently depressed individuals with co-existing insomnia symptoms should be offered additional sleep-directed treatment interventions, in addition to being treated with MBCT.

A growing body of research suggests that mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) may improve symptoms of insomnia (2629). Accordingly, MBIs have been raised as alternative treatment options to cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I), as some individuals do not respond adequately to this otherwise first-choice treatment for insomnia (2932). Potential mechanisms underpinning MBIs’ effects on insomnia are currently less understood (31). However, preliminary evidence suggest that these interventions may improve several of the psychological and behavioral processes assumed to perpetuate the disorder (31). For example, and of particular relevance for insomnia comorbid with recurrent MDD, the chronicity of both depression and insomnia appear to be related to tendencies toward ruminative thinking (i.e., repetitive thinking about potential causes, ongoing experience, and potential consequences of one’s current symptoms and distress) (3134). As MBCT has been found to improve ruminative thinking as well as several other psychological and behavioral processes characteristic for insomnia, it is reasonable to assume that MBCT may also improve insomnia, in addition to reducing the risk of depressive relapse and recurrence (31).

To the best of our knowledge, only one previous randomized controlled trial (RCT) has explored the potential effects of MBCT on sleep complaints among recurrently depressed individuals (3537). This trial resulted in two separate papers, both by Britton and colleagues (35, 36), with somewhat contradicting findings. Their 2010 paper, based on 26 antidepressant-free participants, indicated that neither polysomnographic- nor sleep-diary based sleep improved following MBCT, relative to a waitlist control condition. Instead, MBCT was associated with marginally increases in polysomnographic-bases awakenings and less slow-wave sleep. By contrast, their 2012 paper, based on 23 antidepressant users, suggested that MBCT was associated with reduced total wake time and improved sleep efficiency relative to the waitlist control condition. The contradicting results in the studies by Britton and colleagues, and the limited research base on potential effects of MBCT on insomnia symptoms, suggest that more research on this area is needed.

The present study aimed to explore whether MBCT for recurrent depression improved symptoms of insomnia among remitted individuals with at least three prior depressive episodes. It was also of interest to explore the prevalence rate of insomnia in this subpopulation of depression-afflicted individuals. Based on previous findings that MBCT has been shown effective in improving processes underlying the symptomatology of both recurrent MDD and insomnia (e.g., rumination) (33, 38, 39), we predicted that MBCT would alleviate symptoms of insomnia. Also, and based on the comorbid relationship between depression and insomnia (40, 41), it was predicted that a relatively high proportion of the sample would qualify for the insomnia diagnosis at baseline.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Trial design

The present study is part of a larger randomized wait-list controlled trial (Trial no ISRCTN18001392, registered 22/11/2018) (6) investigating the effects of MBCT on risk and protective factors of MBCT. Primary outcomes of this trial have been published with a detailed methods description (6), showing that MBCT effectively improved these patients’ emotion regulation strategies, depressive symptoms, and self-compassion- and mindfulness skills, while temporarily reducing their tendencies toward rumination and emotional reactivity to stress. The current study uses secondary analyses of data from baseline- and post-intervention assessments of insomnia, conducted before and after the eight-week MBCT intervention. The dependent variables were: (i) The overall severity of insomnia symptom at post-intervention, and (ii) levels of specific insomnia symptoms (sleep onset latency, wake after sleep onset, early morning awakening, non-restorative sleep, daytime impairment, and sleep-related dissatisfaction) following the intervention. This design would allow for detection of changes over time (baseline to post-assessments) while statistically controlling for within-subjects effects.

In the main trial of which the present was based (6), the minimum clinically meaningful difference between the treatments we sought to detect in Beck’s Depression Inventory (BDI) was 7. We also accepted a probability of Type 1 error of 5% with 80% power. Based on a previous study by Kuyken et al. (24) reporting an attrition rate of approximately 15% in their MBCT group, we expected an attrition rate below 20%. Based on this, approximately 30 participants were planned recruited to each treatment condition. A statistical power analysis (performed using G*power) indicated that this sample size would provide acceptable power.

2.2 Setting

Participants were recruited between May 2016 and August 2017, in three separate groups. All pre- and post-intervention assessments were administered at the University of Bergen, Norway, between January and October 2017. The pre- and post-intervention assessments were conducted within a time range of 2 weeks prior to and following the intervention period, respectively.

2.3 Participants

2.3.1 Eligibility criteria

Subjects were eligible for participation if they: (1) Were at least 18 years old; (2) met the criteria for recurrent depressive disorder in either partial or full remission; and (3) had experienced at least three prior depressive episodes. Continuation of antidepressant medication use was allowed if no changes in dosage were made between the baseline and post-intervention assessment phases.

2.3.2 Exclusion criteria

Potential participants were excluded if they: (1) Had any severe comorbid psychological disorder (schizophrenia, any lifetime history of psychosis, or bipolar disorder); (2) fulfilled the criteria for another treatment-needing disorder (borderline personality disorder, a serious eating disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, or severe obsessive-compulsive disorder); (3) had an ongoing substance use disorder; (4) had a neurological or hormonal disease; (5) had a lifetime history of severe cardiovascular disease; (6) contemporarily attended another form of psychotherapy at least two times per month; (7) had received any type of mindfulness-based treatment during the past 24 months; and/or (8) were currently pregnant or breastfeeding.

2.4 Sampling procedures

Participants were recruited through general practitioners and psychiatric outpatient clinics in Bergen, Norway, via newspapers advertisements, and through mental health-related groups on the social media channel Facebook. Subjects who were interested in participation were asked to contact the research team through e-mail or phone. A brief screening based on the inclusion criteria was thereafter administered via phone. Among these, 82 potential participants were further assessed for eligibility using a Norwegian version of the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.) (42, 43). The M.I.N.I. is a semi-structured, diagnostic interview based on the DSM-IV and ICD-10 criteria for the most common axis 1 psychological disorders, including major depressive disorder (first episode or recurrent), substance use disorder, psychotic disorders, and antisocial personality disorder. Levels of depressive symptoms were assessed using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) (44). In addition, the borderline personality disorder module of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV AXIS II personality disorders (SCID-II) (45) was carried out to exclude potential participants with borderline personality disorder. M.I.N.I. and SCID-II were administered by clinical psychologists with extensive clinical training and experience. Demographics, as well as participants’ estimated age of the first depressive episode and time in remission, were also collected during the assessment interviews, based on retrospective recall of the participants.

Following baseline assessments, participants were randomly assigned to either the MBCT condition or the waitlist control condition. To ensure that both conditions were equal in terms of gender, the randomization process was stratified by gender. The randomization process was carried out by a colleague not involved in the project, using the random number generation function of Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Inc., Redmond, WA). Four to eight weeks following the clinical assessments, participants were re-invited to the laboratory to complete self-report questionnaires, including symptoms of insomnia and depression.

2.5 Interventions

2.5.1 MBCT

Participants randomized to the MBCT condition received 8 weeks of MBCT, in line with the original manual by Segal and colleagues (21). The participants received the intervention in groups of eight to 14 participants at the University of Bergen, in three separate groups. In each weekly session, the participants were introduced to a theme relevant for understanding how habitual modes of thinking, feeling, and behaving may contribute to depressive relapse. The participants were also introduced to various practices that aimed to facilitate being mindful of, and relating to, bodily sensations, emotions, and thoughts in a more flexible manner. Participants were encouraged to relate mindfully not only to depression-related inner contents, but to any sort of psychological distress. Additionally, the participants were invited to conduct homework assignments between each session for approximately 45 min per day, 6 days a week. Materials necessary for the home assignments were translated into Norwegian and available for the participants through a webpage. The intervention was instructed in pairs of two clinical psychologists. In total, three therapists with extensive training in MBCT were involved.

2.5.2 Control condition

The control condition was a waitlist control (WLC) condition in which participants received no treatment during the 8 weeks between the baseline and post-intervention assessments. WLC participants were offered the MBCT program after the pre- and post-assessments had been conducted.

2.6 Baseline and outcome assessments

2.6.1 Beck depression inventory-II

A Norwegian validated translation of the Beck depression inventory-II (BDI-II) (46, 47) was used to assess levels of depression during the baseline- and post-intervention assessments. BDI-II is a 21-item self-report inventory assessing emotional, cognitive, physiological, and behavioral symptoms of depression. A total quantitative score of 0–13 indicates no or minimal depression; 14–19 indicates mild depression; 20–28 indicates moderate depression; and 29–63 indicates severe depression. The scale shows good psychometric properties (48). BDI-II had a high internal consistency in the current study (Cronbach’s α = 0.88).

2.6.2 Mini-international neuropsychiatric interview

The mini-international neuropsychiatric interview (M.I.N.I) was used both to assess for eligibility according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, including whether participants qualified for the recurrent subtype of Major depressive disorder. During the initial interviews, participants were also asked about time in remission and how many depressive episodes they had experienced.

2.6.3 Bergen insomnia scale

The Bergen Insomnia Scale (BIS) (49) was used to assess insomnia during the pre- and post-intervention assessments. BIS is a six-item self-report measure based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition (DSM-IV, 1994) criteria for insomnia (12, 49). The scale asks how many days per week, on average, each of six insomnia symptoms have been present during the past month along an 8-point scale, ranging from 0 to 7 days a week. The first item targets how many days per week (0–7), on average, the respondent has experienced sleep onset latency (SOL, defined as sleep onset >30 min). Item 2 targets problematic wake after sleep onset (WASO; defined as awakenings >30 min after the sleep first set in and before one’s final awakening time). Item 3 targets early morning awakening (EMA; defined as final awakening more than 30 min before one’s desired wake-up time). Item 4 asks how many days (0–7) the respondent’s sleep has been experienced as nonrestorative. Item 5 asks how many days per week (0–7) the respondent has experienced daytime sleepiness interfering with private, educational, or occupational activities. Finally, item 6 asks how many days per week (0–7) the respondent has been dissatisfied with her/his sleep.

The respondent is qualified for the insomnia diagnosis if at least one of items 1–4 and at least one of items 5 and 6 have been present for at least 3 days weekly during the past month. Additionally, a total score is obtained by adding up the value of each item, resulting in a total value ranging from 0 to 42 (referred to as “BIS Total” in the following sections), of which higher score indicates more severe overall burden of insomnia symptoms. The scale shows good psychometric properties (49). BIS had a Cronbach’s α of 0.69 in the present study.

For between-group comparisons (MBCT versus WLC), specific insomnia symptom (BIS items 1–6) as well as BIS Total were measured continuously along their respective 0–7 and 0–42 BIS scales. For exploration of the baseline insomnia rate, the full insomnia diagnosis was defined as met if participants fulfilled the BIS criteria for the insomnia diagnosis. Specific insomnia symptoms were defined as met if they were rated as present for an average of at least 3 days a week during the past month.

2.7 Ethics statement

The study followed the Helsinki declaration guidelines and the Vancouver rules. All pre-screening assessments were conducted by experienced clinical psychologists. No economic compensation was given for participation. However, WLC participants were offered MBCT after the post-intervention assessments were completed, and participation was free of charge. All participants provided written consent and were told they could withdraw from the study at any time. The study was approved by the Norwegian Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics of of South East Norway, University of Oslo, Norway (study number 2016/388).

2.8 Statistical methods

All analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics, version 25. Independent samples t-tests, chi-square tests for independence, and Fisher’s Exact Probability Test were performed to ensure that the treatment conditions were equal in terms of age, gender, and depression and insomnia levels, prior to the intervention. Additionally, Fisher’s Exact Probability Tests were performed to check whether the conditions differed in terms of comorbid psychiatric conditions, based on the initial M.I.N.I. screenings. Bivariate correlation analyses were conducted to check whether any of the included insomnia parameters correlated with time in remission or any of the other included insomnia variables. Preliminary checks were performed to test for violation of the assumptions of normality, linearity, homogeneity of variances, and homogeneity of regression slopes for each of the included insomnia parameters. The sample was checked for outliers, and missing values were replaced (for details, see Schanche et al., 2020) (6). All alpha levels were set at 0.05, two-tailed.

One-way between-groups analyses of covariance (ANCOVAs) were performed to compare the effects of MBCT and WLC on post-intervention levels of insomnia (BIS Total as well as BIS items 1–6) while adjusting for baseline levels of corresponding insomnia parameters.

3 Results

3.1 Participant flow

Sixty-eight participants were rated as eligible for participation and randomly allocated to either MBCT (n = 33) or WLC (n = 35). Twenty-eight participants allocated to the MBCT condition received the intervention and attended the baseline- and post-intervention assessments. Two participants randomized to the MBCT condition were excluded from further analyses due to low attendance rate (less than four sessions) during the MBCT course. One further MBCT participant was excluded as this participant did not respond to any of the BIS items neither during the baseline- or post-intervention assessments. Among the 35 participants allocated to WLC, five withdrew due to schedule conflicts; two during the baseline assessments and another three during the post-assessment phase. Thus, the final analyzed sample comprised 55 participants (mean age = 40.7 years; SD = 12.9; 74.5% females); 30 WLC and 25 MBCT participants. All participants of the final analyzed sample responded to all BIS items during both pre- and post-intervention assessments. For detailed flow of participants, please see Figure 1.

Figure 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Flow over participants.

3.2 Baseline analyses

For baseline distribution of the included insomnia parameters, please see Table 1. No differences in terms of age, gender, the rate of participants screening positive for the insomnia diagnosis, comorbid psychiatric conditions according to the M.I.N.I. screenings, BIS Total or BDI-II scores were found between the treatment conditions at baseline (all p-values >0.05). Most of the participants reported being married/cohabiting and fulltime working, and the majority reported having education above high school and/or vocational qualification. Furthermore, less than a third of the sample reported using some sort of antidepressant medication. For further details on participant characteristics, please see Schanche and colleagues, 2020 (6).

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Baseline descriptive statistics for each treatment condition (MBCT or WLC) and the overall sample among study completers.

Descriptive analyses showed that 46 of the 55 participants (83.6% of the overall sample) screened positive for the insomnia diagnosis at baseline. The most prevalent insomnia symptom was nonrestorative sleep, as reported by 83.6% of the sample, followed by prolonged sleep onset (reported by 60.0% of the sample).

3.3 Treatment effect

Estimated marginal means and standard errors of all ANCOVA analyses are presented in Table 2. After the intervention, MBCT participants reported less severe overall insomnia symptoms, relative to control participants (p = 0.017). In terms of specific insomnia symptoms, MBCT participants reported less problems with SOL (p = 0.047) and WASO (p = 0.023) compared to control participants. However, the groups did not report differences on EMA (p = 0.169) or nonrestorative sleep (p = 0.429) at post-intervention after controlling for corresponding sleep parameters at baseline. Likewise, no group differences were found on sleep-related daytime functioning (p = 0.190) or dissatisfaction with sleep (p = 0.067, Table 2) following intervention when adjusting for corresponding baseline variables.

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Results from one-way between-groups analyses of covariance (ANCOVAs) for each treatment condition (MBCT or waitlist control), showing the distribution of insomnia symptoms based on estimated marginal means and standard errors.

4 Discussion

The present study aimed to investigate whether Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) (21) for recurrent depressive disorder alleviated symptoms of insomnia. The majority (83.6%) of the participants screened positive for the insomnia diagnosis as baseline, as assessed through the Bergen Insomnia Scale (BIS). Following 8 weeks of either MBCT or a waiting list control condition, MBCT participants’ overall insomnia symptom severity improved, relative to controls. In terms of specific insomnia symptoms, MBCT participants improved on prolonged sleep onset latency (SOL) and wake after sleep onset (WASO), compared to control participants.

The finding that MBCT participants reported lower overall symptoms of insomnia following the intervention supported the main hypothesis, that MBCT for recurrent depression would alleviate symptoms of insomnia. Furthermore, the improvements in SOL and WASO suggest that MBCT’s effect on the overall burden of insomnia lied in improvement of these specific insomnia symptoms. The results are in line with a growing line of research suggesting that mindfulness-based interventions enhance sleep (26, 27), and indicate that MBCT improves symptoms of insomnia among recurrently depressed individuals.

The findings that MBCT improved participants’ insomnia symptoms are partly in line with Britton and colleagues’ 2012 study, who found that MBCT had beneficial effects on several sleep parameters (35), including total wake time. However, contrary to the present study, Britton’s 2012 study found no benefits of MBCT on prolonged sleep onset or nocturnal awakenings specifically. Results of the present study are also inconsistent with Britton and colleagues’ 2010 trial, which suggested that mindfulness training had some negative effects on participants’ sleep, and no benefits over controls in self-reported sleep (36). The inconsistent findings may lie in methodological disparities between Britton and colleagues’ and the present study. For example, both studies by Britton relied on sleep diaries and polysomnographic assessments, whereas the present study relied on a questionnaire designed to address symptoms typical for insomnia. While polysomnography is often considered the “gold standard” for assessing sleep, insomnia is yet a subjective disorder based on the patients’ perception of their sleep (11). Furthermore, the present study relied on a considerably larger sample size compared to both studies by Britton and colleagues, which may have provided more power to the analyses (50). Nevertheless, the inconsistent results may indicate that additional research on MBCT’s effects on insomnia is needed to fully understand how MBCT affects insomnia.

The non-significant differences in daytime impairment and sleep-related dissatisfaction indicate that although MBCT significantly improved several sleep parameters, the participants did not necessarily perceive their sleep as less problematic following the intervention. Given that the majority of the sample screened positive for the insomnia diagnosis at baseline, and that insomnia seems to predict depressive relapse and recurrence (15, 16), these non-significant findings imply that additional, sleep-specific interventions (i.e., sleep-specific cognitive or behavioral techniques) may be necessary to further improve sleep among recurrently depressed individuals undergoing MBCT. In support of this, an RCT by Ong and colleagues (51) found that mindfulness-based stress reduction, of which MBCT is based (21), was more effective in improving insomnia when combined with sleep-specific treatment components (i.e., from CBT-I). Another possible explanation of the non-significant changes in symptoms among MBCT completers may be that not all participants qualified for insomnia at baseline. This implies that potential benefits of MBCT may have been underestimated to some extent, as one could not expect improvements of insomnia symptoms among insomnia-free participants. Also, it should be noted that the BIS is not validated for investigating single BIS items (e.g., daytime impairment) separately. For future studies, we will therefore recommend including validated tools (e.g., daytime sleepiness scales) to further address how MBCT potentially affects daytime functioning and sleep-related dissatisfaction among insomnia-afflicted individuals.

As the current study was not primarily designed to address MBCT’s effects on insomnia, potential chance mechanisms underlying MBCT’s effects on insomnia were not investigated. Thus, it remains unclear how MBCT was related to the observed improvements of insomnia symptoms. One possibility is that improvements within the emotional, cognitive, and self-relational domains previously shown to improve following MBCT (6, 52) helped MBCT participants overcoming dysfunctional psychological processes assumed to underlie chronic insomnia. For example, and as mentioned previously, it is evident that individuals with insomnia tend to get caught into ruminative thinking when unable to sleep (i.e., repetitively thinking about one’s sleep problem and potential consequences this may have the following day) (32, 53). As ruminative thinking has been linked to increased cognitive and physiological arousal (33), which may increase wakefulness during the pre-sleep period (32), it is likely that reduction in rumination following the MBCT course improved participants’ sleep. Although rumination data were available (6), the sample- and effect sizes were judged too small to include rumination as a potential mediator of the insomnia improvements [see, for example, Qin, 2023; (54)]. In future studies, we will therefore recommend replication using a larger sample size to investigate potential mediators of MBCT’s effects on insomnia.

Furthermore, the finding that 83.6% of the participants screened positive for the insomnia diagnosis at baseline supported the assumption that insomnia would be highly prevalent among recurrently depressed individuals. It is noteworthy that the insomnia rate in the present study exceeded the insomnia rates reported in several epidemiological studies (41, 55), particularly given that participants of the current study were in remission from depression, rather than actively depressed. This finding suggests that recurrently depressed individuals may represent a depression subgroup who are particularly susceptible for developing insomnia. However, as the present findings relied on a small sample size relative to epidemiological studies and the diagnosis of insomnia relied on screening solely, the results should be considered as preliminary and potentially replicated in larger samples with more accurate diagnostic methods.

4.1 Strengths and limitations

A strength of the present trial is that it is among few controlled studies to have examined the effects of MBCT on sleep in a sample consisting of individuals diagnosed with recurrent depressive disorder. To our knowledge, the current study is also among the largest RCTs on the effects of MBCT for recurrent depression on insomnia symptoms conducted to date. Results may increase insight in how sleep should be targeted among recurrently depressed individuals.

The present study also had several limitations. First, it should be noted that the BIS does not differentiate between clinical insomnia and other sleep disorders which may yield similar symptoms (i.e., delayed sleep–wake phase disorder, which may easily be confused with prolonged sleep onset due to insomnia, or non-restorative sleep caused by obstructive sleep apnea (11)). For future research, it may therefore be beneficial to include clinical interviews and additional assessment tools to better differentiate between insomnia and other potential sleep disorders. Furthermore, the present trial did not include any exact sleep time estimates. Thus, although MBCT participants improved on several sleep measures relative to controls, it remains unclear whether this change was associated with improvements in, for instance, participants’ sleep duration. Nevertheless, as the diagnostic criteria for insomnia rely solely on subjectively experienced symptoms (1, 11), we argue that subjective measures were appropriate for the present study. Also, it should be noted that as the current study was not designed to address MBCT’s effects on insomnia specifically, the sample size calculations were based on the Beck’s Depression Inventory. Also, as the study was secondary to a larger randomized controlled trial and seven participants did have any no sleep data available at follow-up, no intention to treat analyses were performed. However, when intention to treat analyses were performed in the original trial, the effects of MBCT on the change mechanisms of investigation among completers were either attuned or became non-significant (6). Also, and as reported in the initial publication of the original trial, seven of the non-completers had experienced more than 10 previous depressive episodes, meaning that the program, for example, may have been too comprehensive for these participants (6). Accordingly, the results of the current study should be considered as valid only among completers. Furthermore, it should be noted that the study did not include an active control group. Consequently, it remains unclear whether the observed insomnia improvements could be explained by non-specific treatment factors or placebo effects. Also, and although the study to date is among the largest conducted on potential effects of mindfulness-based interventions on sleep, the sample size was yet relatively small. Finally, the education level in the current sample was generally higher than in the general population. It is therefore uncertain whether the results are generalizable to individuals with lower education levels.

5 Conclusion

In conclusion, the rate of participants screening positive for the insomnia diagnosis was high (83.6%) at baseline. Following the eight weeks intervention and when adjusting for baseline insomnia levels, MBCT participants screened lower on the overall severity of insomnia symptoms, as well as on prolonged sleep onset and nocturnal awakenings, compared to waitlist control participants. The results imply that insomnia is highly prevalent in recurrently depressed individuals, and that MBCT may have several beneficial effects on insomnia. However, additional sleep-enhancing interventions may be necessary to further improve sleep among recurrently depressed individuals treated with MBCT.

Statement of significance

Recurrent depressive disorder is a highly prevalent and often disabling disorder. Research suggests that insomnia increases the risk of relapse and recurrence of depression. Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) is currently the recommended first-line option for recurrent depression, according to the UK National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence; however, few controlled trials have previously investigated whether MBCT affects insomnia. The present secondary study demonstrated that MBCT improved several insomnia parameters among remitted adult patients with at least three prior episodes of depression. To our knowledge, this is the largest controlled studies on the effects of MBCT on insomnia symptoms conducted to date. Results may enhance the understanding of how insomnia is manifested among recurrently depressed individuals specifically, as well as of how MBCT affects insomnia.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary materials, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics statement

The study was carried out in accordance with the recommendations and approval of the Regional Committee for Medical Research Ethics of Southeast Norway, University of Oslo, Norway, study number 2016/388. All subjects were informed about the study and gave a written informed consent in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All participants provided written consent participate and were told they could withdraw from the study at any time.

Author contributions

ES and LS conceived and designed the trial. LE wrote the manuscript. ES, LS, LE, and colleges at the Department of Clinical Psychology and the Department of Biological and Medical Psychology at the University of Bergen, Norway, acquired the data. All authors contributed to the conception and hypotheses of the current study, contributed substantially to the statistical analyses and interpretation of data, read and revised the final manuscript, and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Funding

The project was financed by several of the researchers’ positions at the University of Bergen, Norway, including two PhD grants from the same institution.

Acknowledgments

We want to thank the participants of this study for their courage and their valuable effort of working toward increased psychological flexibility. We will also thank Jon Vøllestad, Petter Franer, Per Einar Binder, Endre Visted, and Julie Lillebostad Svendsen, as well as Linn Achre Tveit who partook as an MBCT instructor.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. World Health Organization. The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders, clinical description and diagnostic guidelines. Geneva: World Health Organization (1992).

Google Scholar

2. World Health Organization. Depression and other common mental disorders: Global health estimates [Internet]. Geneva, Switzerland: Who Document Production Services (2017) Available at: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/254610/1/WHO-MSD-MER-2017.2-eng.pdf?ua=1 (Accessed May 17, 2023).

Google Scholar

3. Hasin, DS, Sarvet, AL, Meyers, JL, Saha, TD, Ruan, WJ, Stohl, M, et al. Epidemiology of adult DSM-5 major depressive disorder and its specifiers in the United States. JAMA Psychiatry. (2018) 75:336–46. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.4602

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Mueller, TI, Leon, AC, Keller, MB, Solomon, DA, Endicott, J, Coryell, W, et al. Recurrence after recovery from major depressive disorder during 15 years of observational follow-up. Am J Psychiatry. (1999) 156:1000–6. doi: 10.1176/ajp.156.7.1000

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Iancu, SC, Wong, YM, Rhebergen, D, van Balkom, A, and Batelaan, NM. Long-term disability in major depressive disorder: a 6-year follow-up study. Psychol Med. (2020) 50:1644–52. doi: 10.1017/s0033291719001612

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Schanche, E, Vøllestad, J, Visted, E, Svendsen, JL, Osnes, B, Binder, PE, et al. The effects of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy on risk and protective factors of depressive relapse – a randomized wait-list controlled trial. BMC Psychol. (2020) 8:57. doi: 10.1186/s40359-020-00417-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Thaipisuttikul, P, Ittasakul, P, Waleeprakhon, P, Wisajun, P, and Jullagate, S. Psychiatric comorbidities in patients with major depressive disorder. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. (2014) 10:2097–103. doi: 10.2147/ndt.S72026

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Farmer, A, Korszun, A, Owen, MJ, Craddock, N, Jones, L, Jones, I, et al. Medical disorders in people with recurrent depression. Br J Psychiatry. (2008) 192:351–5. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.107.038380

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Greenberg, PE, Fournier, AA, Sisitsky, T, Pike, CT, and Kessler, RC. The economic burden of adults with major depressive disorder in the United States (2005 and 2010). J Clin Psychiatry. (2015) 76:155–62. doi: 10.4088/JCP.14m09298

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Nutt, D, Wilson, S, and Paterson, L. Sleep disorders as core symptoms of depression. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. (2008) 10:329–36. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2008.10.3/dnutt

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. American Academy of Sleep Medicine. International classification of sleep disorders. 3rd ed. Darien, IL: American Academy of Sleep Medicine (2014).

Google Scholar

12. American Psychiatric Association, D. S. M. T. F., & American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders - DSM-5. (Vol. 5, No. 5). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association (2013).

Google Scholar

13. Fang, H, Tu, S, Sheng, J, and Shao, A. Depression in sleep disturbance: a review on a bidirectional relationship, mechanisms and treatment. J Cell Mol Med. (2019) 23:2324–32. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.14170

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Baglioni, C, Battagliese, G, Feige, B, Spiegelhalder, K, Nissen, C, Voderholzer, U, et al. Insomnia as a predictor of depression: a meta-analytic evaluation of longitudinal epidemiological studies. J Affect Disord. (2011) 135:10–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2011.01.011

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Dombrovski, AY, Cyranowski, JM, Mulsant, BH, Houck, PR, Buysse, DJ, Andreescu, C, et al. Which symptoms predict recurrence of depression in women treated with maintenance interpersonal psychotherapy? Depress Anxiety. (2008) 25:1060–6. doi: 10.1002/da.20467

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Reynolds, CF 3rd, Frank, E, Houck, PR, Mazumdar, S, Dew, MA, Cornes, C, et al. Which elderly patients with remitted depression remain well with continued interpersonal psychotherapy after discontinuation of antidepressant medication? Am J Psychiatr. (1997) 154:958–62. doi: 10.1176/ajp.154.7.958

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Perlis, ML, Giles, DE, Buysse, DJ, Tu, X, and Kupfer, DJ. Self-reported sleep disturbance as a prodromal symptom in recurrent depression. J Affect Disord. (1997) 42:209–12. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0327(96)01411-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Morin, CM, Bélanger, L, LeBlanc, M, Ivers, H, Savard, J, Espie, CA, et al. The natural history of insomnia: a population-based 3-year longitudinal study. Arch Intern Med. (2009) 169:447–53. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2008.610

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Bei, B, Asarnow, LD, Krystal, A, Edinger, JD, Buysse, DJ, and Manber, R. Treating insomnia in depression: insomnia related factors predict long-term depression trajectories. J Consult Clin Psychol. (2018) 86:282–93. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000282

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Franzen, PL, and Buysse, DJ. Sleep disturbances and depression: risk relationships for subsequent depression and therapeutic implications. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. (2008) 10:473–81. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2008.10.4/plfranzen

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Segal, Z, Williams, M, and Teasdale, J. Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for depression. 2nd ed. New York: The Guilford Press (2013).

Google Scholar

22. Kuyken, W, Hayes, R, Barrett, B, Byng, R, Dalgleish, T, Kessler, D, et al. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy compared with maintenance antidepressant treatment in the prevention of depressive relapse or recurrence (PREVENT): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. (2015) 386:63–73. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(14)62222-4

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Piet, J, and Hougaard, E. The effect of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for prevention of relapse in recurrent major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev. (2011) 31:1032–40. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2011.05.002

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Kuyken, W, Byford, S, Taylor, RS, Watkins, E, Holden, E, White, K, et al. Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy to prevent relapse in recurrent depression. J Consult Clin Psychol. (2008) 76:966–78. doi: 10.1037/a0013786

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Depression in adults. Treatment and management: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2022). Available at: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng222/chapter/Recommendations#preventing-relapse

Google Scholar

26. Rusch, HL, Rosario, M, Levison, LM, Olivera, A, Livingston, WS, Wu, T, et al. The effect of mindfulness meditation on sleep quality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann N Y Acad Sci. (2019) 1445:5–16. doi: 10.1111/nyas.13996

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Chan, SH, Lui, D, Chan, H, Sum, K, Cheung, A, Yip, H, et al. Effects of mindfulness-based intervention programs on sleep among people with common mental disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Psychiatry. (2022) 12:636–50. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v12.i4.636

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Rash, JA, Kavanagh, VAJ, and Garland, SN. A Meta-analysis of mindfulness-based therapies for insomnia and sleep disturbance: moving towards processes of change. Sleep Med Clin. (2019) 14:209–33. doi: 10.1016/j.jsmc.2019.01.004

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Shallcross, AJ, Visvanathan, PD, Sperber, SH, and Duberstein, ZT. Waking up to the problem of sleep: can mindfulness help? A review of theory and evidence for the effects of mindfulness for sleep. Curr Opin Psychol. (2019) 28:37–41. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.10.005

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. van Straten, A, van der Zweerde, T, Kleiboer, A, Cuijpers, P, Morin, CM, and Lancee, J. Cognitive and behavioral therapies in the treatment of insomnia: a meta-analysis. Sleep Med Rev. (2018) 38:3–16. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2017.02.001

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Shallcross, AJ, and Visvanathan, PD. Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for insomnia In: SJ Eisendrath, editor. Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy: Innovative applications. Cham: Springer International Publishing (2016). 19–29.

Google Scholar

32. Harvey, A. A cognitive theory and therapy for chronic insomnia. J Cogn Psychother. (2005) 19:41–59. doi: 10.1891/088983905780907289

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Palagini, L, Moretto, U, Dell'Osso, L, and Carney, C. Sleep-related cognitive processes, arousal, and emotion dysregulation in insomnia disorder: the role of insomnia-specific rumination. Sleep Med. (2017) 30:97–104. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2016.11.004

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Baer, RA. Mindfulness, assessment, and transdiagnostic processes. Psychol Inq. (2007) 18:238–42. doi: 10.1080/10478400701598306

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Britton, WB, Haynes, PL, Fridel, KW, and Bootzin, RR. Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy improves polysomnographic and subjective sleep profiles in antidepressant users with sleep complaints. Psychother Psychosom. (2012) 81:296–304. doi: 10.1159/000332755

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Britton, WB, Haynes, PL, Fridel, KW, and Bootzin, RR. Polysomnographic and subjective profiles of sleep continuity before and after mindfulness-based cognitive therapy in partially remitted depression. Psychosom Med. (2010) 72:539–48. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e3181dc1bad

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Shahar, B, Britton, W, Sbarra, D, Figueredo, A, and Bootzin, R. Mechanisms of change in mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for depression: preliminary evidence from a randomized controlled trial. Int J Cogn Ther. (2010) 3:402–18. doi: 10.1521/ijct.2010.3.4.402

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Figueroa, CA, DeJong, H, Mocking, RJT, Fox, E, Rive, MM, Schene, AH, et al. Attentional control, rumination and recurrence of depression. J Affect Disord. (2019) 256:364–72. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.05.072

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Michalak, J, Hölz, A, and Teismann, T. Rumination as a predictor of relapse in mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for depression. Psychol Psychother. (2011) 84:230–6. doi: 10.1348/147608310x520166

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Park, SC, Kim, JM, Jun, TY, Lee, MS, Kim, JB, Jeong, SH, et al. Prevalence and clinical correlates of insomnia in depressive disorders: the CRESCEND study. Psychiatry Investig. (2013) 10:373–81. doi: 10.4306/pi.2013.10.4.373

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Sivertsen, B, Salo, P, Mykletun, A, Hysing, M, Pallesen, S, Krokstad, S, et al. The bidirectional association between depression and insomnia: the HUNT study. Psychosom Med. (2012) 74:758–65. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e3182648619

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Sheehan, DV, Lecrubier, Y, Sheehan, KH, Amorim, P, Janavs, J, Weiller, E, et al. The Mini-international neuropsychiatric interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. J Clin Psychiatry. (1998) 59:22–33, quiz 34–57.

Google Scholar

43. Leikenes, KA, Malt, U, Malt, EA, and Leganger, S. M.I.N.I. MINI Internasjonalt Neuropsykiatrisk Intervju. Norsk versjon 5.0.0 Oslo: Psykosomatisk avdeling, Rikshospitalet (2007).

Google Scholar

44. Hamilton, M. A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. (1960) 23:56–62. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.23.1.56

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

45. First, MB, Gibbon, M, Spitzer, RL, Williams, JBW, and Benhamin, LS. Structured clinical interview for DSM-VI axis II personality disorders (SCID-II). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association (1997).

Google Scholar

46. Beck, A, Steer, R, and Brown, G. Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory-II. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation (1996).

Google Scholar

47. Aasen, H. An empirical investigation of depression symptoms: norms, psychometric characteristics and factor structure of the Beck depression inventory II. Bergen: University of Bergen (2001).

Google Scholar

48. Dozois, DJA, Dobson, KS, and Ahnberg, JL. A psychometric evaluation of the Beck depression inventory–II. Psychol Assess. (1998) 10:83–9. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.10.2.83

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Pallesen, S, Bjorvatn, B, Nordhus, IH, Sivertsen, B, Hjørnevik, M, and Morin, CM. A new scale for measuring insomnia: the Bergen insomnia scale. Percept Mot Skills. (2008) 107:691–706. doi: 10.2466/pms.107.3.691-706

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Andrade, C. Sample size and its importance in research. Indian J Psychol Med. (2020) 42:102–3. doi: 10.4103/ijpsym.Ijpsym_504_19

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Ong, JC, Manber, R, Segal, Z, Xia, Y, Shapiro, S, and Wyatt, JK. A randomized controlled trial of mindfulness meditation for chronic insomnia. Sleep. (2014) 37:1553–63. doi: 10.5665/sleep.4010

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

52. van der Velden, AM, Kuyken, W, Wattar, U, Crane, C, Pallesen, KJ, Dahlgaard, J, et al. A systematic review of mechanisms of change in mindfulness-based cognitive therapy in the treatment of recurrent major depressive disorder. Clin Psychol Rev. (2015) 37:26–39. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2015.02.001

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Harvey, AG. Pre-sleep cognitive activity: a comparison of sleep-onset insomniacs and good sleepers. Br J Clin Psychol. (2000) 39:275–86. doi: 10.1348/014466500163284

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Qin, X. Sample size and power calculations for causal mediation analysis: a tutorial and shiny app. Behav Res Methods. (2023). doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02118-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Stewart, R, Besset, A, Bebbington, P, Brugha, T, Lindesay, J, Jenkins, R, et al. Insomnia comorbidity and impact and hypnotic use by age group in a national survey population aged 16 to 74 years. Sleep. (2006) 29:1391–7. doi: 10.1093/sleep/29.11.1391

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: MBCT, mindfulness, psychotherapy, recurrent depression, insomnia, sleep

Citation: Evanger LN, Flo-Groeneboom E, Sørensen L and Schanche E (2024) Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy improves insomnia symptoms in individuals with recurrent depression: secondary analyses from a randomized controlled trial. Front. Psychiatry. 14:1231040. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1231040

Received: 29 May 2023; Accepted: 27 December 2023;
Published: 19 January 2024.

Edited by:

Kittisak Sawanyawisuth, Khon Kaen University, Thailand

Reviewed by:

Huirong Zheng, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, China
Simen Berg Saksvik, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway
Kaia Kjørstad, Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH), Norway

Copyright © 2024 Evanger, Flo-Groeneboom, Sørensen and Schanche. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Linn Nyjordet Evanger, linn.evanger@uib.no

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.