Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

EDITORIAL article

Front. Psychiatry, 11 August 2025

Sec. Mood Disorders

Volume 16 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1659734

This article is part of the Research TopicThe Role of Affect Regulation in Bipolar DisordersView all 7 articles

Editorial: The role of affect regulation in bipolar disorders

  • 1Nydalen District Psychiatric Center, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
  • 2Department of Research and Development, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
  • 3Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
  • 4Section for Psychosis Research, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway

Bipolar disorders (BD) are a group of complex mental illnesses with a lifetime prevalence of 2.4% (1), characterized by illness episodes with extreme alterations in mood and activity that typically emerge in early adulthood. Despite early detection and psychopharmacological treatment to manage episodes, many individuals respond only partially to treatment and continue to experience affective symptoms and impaired functioning. Difficulties with affect regulation are increasingly being highlighted as a pathway to understanding the persistent gaps in treatment outcomes (25). This change in focus is welcome and follows an important and emerging trend where affective dysregulation is seen as clinically significant transdiagnostic features, with important implications for both understanding and treatment across different mental disorders.

In BD, affective dysregulation including affective lability, defined as rapid, excessive and unpredictable fluctuations between different affective states (6), is observed prior to illness onset, during both depressed and elevated mood episodes, as well as during euthymic periods throughout the course of illness (712). It is linked to childhood trauma—which is prevalent in the BD population—and associated with anxiety, suicidality, impaired functioning and substance use (1316). It is important to recognize the role of affective dysregulation as a key contributing factor to complex clinical presentations, particularly in cases where state-of-the-art pharmacological treatments do not adequately alleviate symptoms or improve quality of life. Viewing core aspects of BD through this transdiagnostic lens also opens new opportunities to draw on advances in treatment and conceptual frameworks from other areas in mental health care. In this Research Topic, we proudly present a collection of papers that serve to advance our understanding of the role of affect regulation in BD.

In this Research Topic, a perspective article by Azevedo et al. provides an overview of how the European Network for Bipolar Emotion Regulation views the current evidence on affective dysregulation in BD and outlines specific steps to help bridge the gap between research and clinical practice. Importantly, they note that treatments such as Dialectical Behavior Therapy have already demonstrated effectiveness in improving affect regulation and supporting personal recovery in BD. To further support the development of interventions targeting affect regulation, the authors advocate for a greater focus on personal recovery and quality of life and emphasize the value of increasing user involvement in research design.

In line with this, Engen et al. present a feasibility study using both qualitative interviews and quantitative outcome data to evaluate the transdiagnostic treatment model the Unified Protocol (UP), delivered in a group setting. This pilot included patients with BD early in the course of treatment and found significant reductions in affective lability, along with improvements in well-being and functioning. The study concludes by outlining specific refinements to the treatment format, informed by insights from the participants.

An important study by Visalli et al. shows how dysregulated affect can impact outcomes through poorer self-care and reduced adherence to treatment. Their results indicate that hyperthymic temperament—as opposed to depressive or cyclothymic temperaments—was associated with better treatment adherence. Tokumitsu et al. further elaborate on the complex relationship between clinical features and illness course in a large Japanese outpatient sample (N = 2,392). In this study, alcohol dependence was found to be associated with BD I, manic episodes, comorbid psychiatric disorders, and suicidal ideation, especially among women. These studies highlight the relationship between dysregulated affect and maladaptive coping strategies, with important implications for intervention- and treatment planning.

The biological underpinnings of affective dysregulation are thoroughly reviewed in a paper by Durdurak et al. This narrative review describes how affective dysregulation in BD is linked to factors such as genetics, brain structure, neuroinflammation, circadian rhythm disturbances, and abnormalities in neuroplasticity. This comprehensive overview invites readers to consider the broad and interconnected biological mechanisms underlying affective dysregulation, while the paper by Wang et al. specifically investigates how the immune system biomarker Interleukin-17 (IL-17) is implicated in affective disturbances in BD.

Together, these contributions illustrate the diverse and multifaceted nature of affect regulation in BD. From biological mechanisms and clinical interventions to psychosocial influences and emerging treatment models, the papers in this Research Topic collectively underscore the importance of targeting affect regulation as a core component of future frameworks for understanding and treating BD.

Author contributions

ME: Conceptualization, Investigation, Project administration, Resources, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. TL: Conceptualization, Investigation, Project administration, Resources, Writing – review & editing. MH: Conceptualization, Investigation, Project administration, Resources, Writing – review & editing.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript. The first draft was written without generative AI. ChatGPT v 4o was then prompted to check and improve language. The manuscript was then reviewed and edited without the use of AI, and the authors take full responsibility for the written content.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Merikangas KR, Jin R, He J-P, Kessler RC, Lee S, Sampson NA, et al. Prevalence and correlates of bipolar spectrum disorder in the world mental health survey initiative. Arch Gen Psychiatry. (2011) 68:241–51. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.12

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Marwaha S, Price C, Scott J, Weich S, Cairns A, Dale J, et al. Affective instability in those with and without mental disorders: A case control study. J Affect Disord. (2018) 241:492–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.08.046

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Oliva V, De Prisco M, Fico G, Possidente C, Fortea L, Montejo L, et al. Correlation between emotion dysregulation and mood symptoms of bipolar disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. (2023) 148:472–90. doi: 10.1111/acps.13618

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Miola A, Cattarinussi G, Antiga G, Caiolo S, Solmi M, and Sambataro F. Difficulties in emotion regulation in bipolar disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. (2022) 302:352–60. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.01.102

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. O’Donnell LA, Ellis AJ, Van de Loo MM, Stange JP, Axelson DA, Kowatch RA, et al. Mood instability as a predictor of clinical and functional outcomes in adolescents with bipolar I and bipolar II disorder. J Affect Disord. (2018) 236:199–206. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.04.021

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Zwicker A, Drobinin V, MacKenzie LE, Howes Vallis E, Patterson VC, Cumby J, et al. Affective lability in offspring of parents with major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. (2020) 29:445–51. doi: 10.1007/s00787-019-01355-z

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Taylor RH, Ulrichsen A, Young AH, and Strawbridge R. Affective lability as a prospective predictor of subsequent bipolar disorder diagnosis: a systematic review. Int J Bipolar Disord. (2021) 9:33. doi: 10.1186/s40345-021-00237-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Howes OD, Lim S, Theologos G, Yung AR, Goodwin GM, and McGuire P. A comprehensive review and model of putative prodromal features of bipolar affective disorder. psychol Med. (2011) 41:1567–77. doi: 10.1017/S0033291710001790

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Aminoff SR, Jensen J, Lagerberg TV, Hellvin T, Sundet K, Andreassen OA, et al. An association between affective lability and executive functioning in bipolar disorder. Psychiatry Res. (2012) 198:58–61. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2011.12.044

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Henry C, Van den Bulke D, Bellivier F, Roy I, Swendsen J, M’Baïlara K, et al. Affective lability and affect intensity as core dimensions of bipolar disorders during euthymic period. Psychiatry Res. (2008) 159:1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2005.11.016

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Henry C, Swendsen J, Van den Bulke D, Sorbara F, Demotes-Mainard J, and Leboyer M. Emotional hyper-reactivity as a fundamental mood characteristic of manic and mixed states. Eur Psychiatry. (2003) 18:124–8. doi: 10.1016/S0924-9338(03)00041-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Gershon A and Eidelman P. Inter-episode affective intensity and instability: predictors of depression and functional impairment in bipolar disorder. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. (2015) 46:14–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2014.07.005

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Aas M, Aminoff SR, Lagerberg TV, Etain B, Agartz I, Andreassen OA, et al. Affective lability in patients with bipolar disorders is associated with high levels of childhood trauma. Psychiatry Res. (2014) 218:252–5. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2014.03.046

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Aas M, Henry C, Bellivier F, Lajnef M, Gard S, Kahn J-P, et al. Affective lability mediates the association between childhood trauma and suicide attempts, mixed episodes and co-morbid anxiety disorders in bipolar disorders. Psychol Med. (2017) 47:902–12. doi: 10.1017/S0033291716003081

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Høegh MC, Melle I, Aminof SR, Olsen SH, Lunding SH, Ueland T, et al. Affective lability and social functioning in severe mental disorders. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. (2022) 272:873–85. doi: 10.1007/s00406-022-01380-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Lagerberg TV, Aminoff SR, Aas M, Bjella T, Henry C, Leboyer M, et al. Alcohol use disorders are associated with increased affective lability in bipolar disorder. J Affect Disord. (2017) 208:316–24. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.09.062

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: bipolar disorders (BD), affect regulation, clinical interventions, biological mechanisms, perspectives, research targets, treatment models

Citation: Engen MJ, Lagerberg TV and Høegh MC (2025) Editorial: The role of affect regulation in bipolar disorders. Front. Psychiatry 16:1659734. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1659734

Received: 04 July 2025; Accepted: 21 July 2025;
Published: 11 August 2025.

Edited and Reviewed by:

Marcin Siwek, Jagiellonian University, Poland

Copyright © 2025 Engen, Lagerberg and Høegh. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Magnus Johan Engen, dXhlbm1mQG91cy1oZi5ubw==

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.