Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Surg., 24 November 2025

Sec. Orthopedic Surgery

Volume 12 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2025.1681209

This article is part of the Research TopicPerioperative Management and Clinical Challenges in Elderly Major Surgical PatientsView all 17 articles

Impact of tranexamic acid on hidden blood loss in intertrochanteric fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials


Yan Meng,&#x;Yan Meng1,†Yong Zhang,&#x;Yong Zhang2,†Hanzhong XueHanzhong Xue3Ning DuanNing Duan3Zhong LiZhong Li3Qian Wang
Qian Wang3*Yao Lu

Yao Lu3*
  • 1Department of Surgery, Honghui Hospital, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China
  • 2Department of Joint Surgery, Beidaihe Rest and Recuperation Center of PLA, Qinhuangdao, Hebei, China
  • 3Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Honghui Hospital, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China

Background: Intertrochanteric fractures (IFs) are a common type of fracture in the elderly and are often associated with substantial hidden blood loss (HBL) due to trauma and surgery. Tranexamic acid (TXA) has emerged as a potential intervention to reduce perioperative bleeding. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of TXA administration in elderly patients with IFs undergoing intramedullary nailing, through a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Methods: Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, and PubMed were searched for relevant RCTs published from inception to January 2025. Data on HBL, total blood loss (TBL), transfusion rate, and thromboembolic events were extracted. Review Manager 5.3.5 was used to assess the safety and efficacy of TXA.

Results: Eight RCTs involving 735 patients (363 in the TXA group and 372 in the control group) were included in the meta-analysis. The TXA group demonstrated significantly lower HBL [standard mean difference (SMD) = −0.59; 95% confidence interval (CI), −0.74 to −0.45] and TBL (SMD = −0.74; 95% CI, −0.91 to −0.58), as well as a reduced transfusion rate [relative risk (RR) = 0.50; 95% CI, 0.35–0.72] compared with the control group. Additionally, no significant difference in thromboembolic events was found between the two groups.

Conclusions: Current evidence indicates that TXA significantly reduces HBL and transfusion requirements without increasing the risk of thromboembolic events in elderly patients with IFs.

1 Introduction

Intertrochanteric fractures (IFs) are a common type of fracture in the elderly, often resulting from falls or trauma. These injuries significantly impair quality of life and increase the risk of long-term complications and healthcare costs, particularly in aging societies (1). Current treatment modalities for IFs include surgical fixation techniques such as intramedullary nailing. However, despite advancements in surgical techniques, patients frequently experience perioperative complications, including hidden blood loss, which can increase the need for blood transfusion and adversely affect recovery (2). Our previous study reported 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year mortality rates after IF surgery of 9.6%, 16.7%, and 24.4%, respectively (3). Perioperative anemia is an important risk factor for mortality following IF surgery (3, 4). Allogeneic blood transfusion is a common method used to treat severe anemia. However, it carries a higher risk of transfusion reactions and bacterial infection (5).

Tranexamic acid (TXA) is an antifibrinolytic agent that has received increasing attention in recent years for its potential to reduce perioperative blood loss in various surgical settings (68). Numerous studies have suggested that TXA administration may significantly reduce intraoperative and postoperative blood loss and lower transfusion requirements, without increasing the risk of thromboembolic complications during hip and knee replacement surgeries (8, 9). Most studies have focused on hip fractures, which include both IFs and femoral neck fractures. However, important distinctions exist between these two types of fractures, including differences in patient demographics, surgical interventions, and prognosis. Many questions remain regarding the efficacy and safety of TXA in elderly patients with IFs undergoing intramedullary nailing.

Therefore, the aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the effectiveness and safety of TXA in patients undergoing IF surgery with intramedullary nailing.

2 Materials and methods

This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines (10). As no individual participant data were collected, additional ethical approval was not required.

2.1 Search strategy

The electronic databases Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, and PubMed were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published from database inception to January 2025. Two independent researchers conducted the literature search using the following keywords: “Tranexamic Acid”, “TXA”, “Intertrochanteric Fractures”, “Subtrochanteric Fractures”, “proximal femoral nail anti-rotation”, “PFNA”, “intramedullary nailing”, and “IMN”. The search strategy is shown in Supplementary Material 1. In addition, the reference lists of relevant reviews were screened to identify additional studies eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis.

2.2 Eligibility criteria

The inclusion criteria for this study were as follows: (1) adult patients diagnosed with intertrochanteric fractures; (2) intervention group receiving intravenous (IV) TXA treatment; (3) control group receiving placebo, saline, or no intervention; (4) study design as a randomized controlled trial (RCT); (5) undergoing IF surgery with intramedullary nailing; and (6) reporting of hidden blood loss as an outcome indicator. The exclusion criteria were: (1) reviews, conference abstracts, commentaries, or other non-original research articles; (2) animal studies; (3) retrospective studies, cohort studies, case reports, and case series; and (4) duplicate publications or multiple reports based on the same dataset, in which case only the study with the most comprehensive information was included.

2.2.1 Data extraction and quality assessment

Two investigators independently extracted data according to the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The extracted information included the first author's name and publication year, study design, basic characteristics of the study population (sample size, age, and gender composition), fixation method, intervention details, follow-up duration, and outcomes [total blood loss (TBL), hidden blood loss (HBL), transfusion rate, and thromboembolic events]. After completing the data extraction, the investigators exchanged and reviewed their extraction tables. Any discrepancies were resolved through discussion. The Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool was used to assess the quality of the included RCTs (11).

2.2.2 Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using RevMan version 5.3.5 and Stata version 14.0. For continuous data, the standard mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was calculated. For dichotomous data, relative risk (RR) with 95% CIs was used. Heterogeneity among studies was assessed using the chi-square test and the I2 statistic. A fixed-effects model was applied when I2 ≤ 50%, while a random-effects model was used when I2 > 50%. Egger's test was conducted to evaluate the presence of significant publication bias.

3 Results

3.1 Included studies

The results of the literature search and screening process are presented in Figure 1. A total of 390 articles were retrieved from electronic databases (PubMed: 45; Embase: 58; Web of Science: 287). After removing 93 duplicates, 297 records remained. Screening of titles and abstracts led to the exclusion of 269 articles that did not meet the inclusion criteria. Full-text reviews were then conducted on the remaining 28 articles, of which 20 were excluded. Ultimately, 8 articles were included in the meta-analysis (1219). Out of the 8 RCTs included in this study, 4 have clinical trial registration numbers (1619).

Figure 1
Flowchart of a study selection process. It begins with 390 records identified through database searches and none added from other sources. After removing duplicates, 297 records remain. All are screened, 269 are excluded, leaving 28 full-text articles for eligibility assessment. Of these, 20 are excluded for reasons including non-randomized controlled trials, conference proceedings, retrospective studies, and others. Eight studies are included in both qualitative and quantitative synthesis.

Figure 1. PRISMA flowchart.

3.2 Study characteristics and quality evaluation

Eight RCTs comprising a total of 735 patients were included in the analysis, with sample sizes ranging from 55 to 122 patients. Among these, 363 patients were in the TXA group and 372 in the control group. The majority of participants (62.31%) were female, with an age range of 72–83 years. All patients were diagnosed with intertrochanteric fractures and underwent closed reduction and internal fixation using intramedullary nails. All included studies administered TXA via the IV route (Table 1). The quality of the included studies was rated as moderate to high. A summary of the risk of bias for each study is presented in Figure 2.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. The characteristics of the included patients.

Figure 2
A risk of bias summary table for various studies, showing evaluations across seven domains: random sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding of participants, blinding of outcome assessment, incomplete outcome data, selective reporting, and other bias. Each cell contains a symbol indicating risk: green plus for low risk, yellow question mark for unclear risk, and red minus for high risk. The studies assessed range from 2017 to 2024.

Figure 2. The risk of bias for each study.

3.3 Meta-analysis results

3.3.1 HBL

A total of eight studies reported outcomes on HBL. There was no significant heterogeneity among these studies (I2 = 32.4%, p = 0.169); therefore, a fixed-effects model was used for the analysis. The pooled results indicated that the amount of HBL in the TXA group was significantly lower than in the control group (SMD = −0.59; 95% CI, −0.74 to −0.45; Figure 3).

Figure 3
Forest plot showing the standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for various studies from 2017 to 2024. The SMD values range from -0.12 to -0.90. Weights vary from 7.78% to 16.03%. The overall effect is indicated as -0.59, with I-squared equal to 32.4% and a p-value of 0.169. The plot includes horizontal lines for each study with a diamond shape representing the overall effect.

Figure 3. Forest plot for hidden blood loss.

3.3.2 TBL

Seven studies investigated TBL. No heterogeneity was observed among the studies (I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.522), and a fixed-effects model was applied. The pooled data showed that TBL in the TXA group was significantly lower than in the control group (SMD = −0.74; 95% CI, −0.91 to −0.58; Figure 4).

Figure 4
Forest plot showing standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals for several studies: Lei 2017 (-0.55), Tian 2018 (-0.66), Zhou 2019 (-1.07), Wang 2021 (-0.66), Ekinci 2022 (-0.65), Zhang 2022 (-0.93), Zhu 2024 (-0.53). Overall effect is -0.74 (I-squared = 0.0%, p = 0.522), displayed as a diamond. Weights vary, with Zhang 2022 having the highest at 19.00%.

Figure 4. Forest plot for total blood loss.

3.3.3 Transfusion rate

Transfusion rate outcomes were reported in seven studies. The transfusion rate was 27.4% (84/307) in the TXA group and 51.6% (163/316) in the control group. Significant heterogeneity was identified in the pooled analysis (I2 = 53.2%, p = 0.046); thus, a random-effects model was used. The pooled results demonstrated that the transfusion rate in the TXA group was significantly lower than in the control group (RR = 0.50; 95% CI, 0.35–0.72; Figure 5).

Figure 5
A forest plot depicting the relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for various studies from 2017 to 2024. Each study is represented by a line and square on a horizontal axis with a dashed vertical line at 1.0, denoting no effect. The studies are listed with their respective RRs and weights, with a summary diamond at the bottom indicating the overall effect (I-squared = 53.2%, p = 0.046). The weights come from a random effects analysis. Studies include Lei 2017, Tian 2018, Zhou 2019, Wang 2021, Ekinci 2022, Zhang 2022, and Zhu 2024.

Figure 5. Forest plot for transfusion rate.

3.3.4 Thromboembolic events

Thromboembolic events include lower-limb deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). Seven studies reported data on DVT events. The incidence of lower-limb DVT in the TXA group was 6.9% (23/330), while it was 6.1% (21/340) in the control group. No heterogeneity was observed among the studies (I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.977), and a fixed-effects model was used for the analysis. The meta-analysis indicated that there was no significant difference in DVT events between the TXA and control groups (RR = 1.19; 95% CI, 0.68–2.09; Figure 6A). Five studies reported data on PE events. The incidence of PE in the TXA group was 6.9% (9/224), while it was 6.1% (11/234) in the control group. No heterogeneity was observed among the studies (I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.921), and a fixed-effects model was used for the analysis. The meta-analysis indicated that there was no significant difference in PE events between the TXA and control groups (RR = 0.98; 95% CI 0.45–2.12; Figure 6B).

Figure 6
Forest plot with two panels labeled A and B. Each panel displays a series of studies with risk ratios (RR), confidence intervals (95% CI), and weight percentages. Panel A lists seven studies with overall RR of 1.19, CI of 0.68 to 2.09, and I-squared of 0.0%, p-value 0.977. Panel B lists five studies with overall RR of 0.98, CI of 0.45 to 2.12, and I-squared of 0.0%, p-value 0.921. Horizontal lines represent confidence intervals around each study’s RR.

Figure 6. Forest plot for thromboembolic events. (A) DVT. (B) PE.

3.3.5 Sensitivity analysis and publication bias

As shown in Figure 7, the results of the Egger test for all four outcomes—HBL (p = 0.805), TBL (p = 0.229), transfusion rate (p = 0.08), DVT (p = 0.289) and PE (p = 0.911) — were not statistically significant (all p > 0.05), indicating no evidence of significant publication bias.

Figure 7
Five scatter plots labeled A to E depict the standard normal deviate (SND) of the effect estimate against precision. Each plot shows data points, a regression line, and a ninety-five percent confidence interval for the intercept. The precision values and distribution of data points vary among the plots, indicating different trends and correlations in each study.

Figure 7. Publication bias. (A) HBL; (B) TBL; (C) Transfusion rate; (D) DVT; (E) PE.

The results of the sensitivity analysis indicated that excluding any single study did not significantly affect the pooled SMD (HBL, TBL, transfusion rate, DVT and PE) (Figure 8), suggesting that the findings of this meta-analysis are relatively robust.

Figure 8
Five forest plots labeled A to E show meta-analysis estimates with specific studies omitted. Each plot displays studies from Lei 2017 to Zhu 2024, highlighting the lower confidence limit, estimate, and upper confidence limit. The x-axes differ by plot, illustrating the range and impact of omitting each study on the overall estimates.

Figure 8. Sensitivity analysis. (A) HBL; (B) TBL; (C) Transfusion rate; (D) DVT; (E) PE.

4 Discussion

IF is a common injury among the elderly, often resulting from falls or traumatic incidents. These fractures significantly impair the quality of life of affected individuals and increase the risk of long-term complications, including prolonged immobility and elevated healthcare costs (1). As the global population ages, the incidence of IF is expected to rise, making effective treatment and prevention strategies increasingly important (1). Current management options primarily include surgical stabilization; however, challenges such as postoperative bleeding, hematoma formation, and delayed recovery persist (2022). Therefore, exploring new therapeutic approaches—such as the use of antifibrinolytic agents like TXA—to reduce postoperative blood loss is crucial for improving outcomes in this population (2224).

The present study aimed to provide high-quality evidence on the efficacy and safety of intravenous TXA administration in patients with IF undergoing intramedullary nailing, through a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. The primary findings of this study are as follows: (1) intravenous TXA was associated with significantly lower HBL, TBL, and transfusion rates compared to the control group; and (2) there was no significant difference in the incidence of thromboembolic events between the TXA and control groups. These results provide clinically relevant evidence supporting the use of TXA in IF management and may inform future clinical practice and research in this area.

HBL is a significant yet often underestimated phenomenon observed in patients undergoing surgical procedures, particularly in the context of IF (2). HBL refers to the blood loss that is not readily apparent or directly measured during surgery, in contrast to overt blood loss, which is visibly identifiable and quantifiable. HBL may result from various physiological and surgical factors and can lead to a substantial decline in hemoglobin levels without obvious external bleeding. Although the intramedullary nailing technique is a widely used treatment for IF and effectively reduces intraoperative blood loss due to its minimally invasive nature and stable fixation, it is still associated with considerable total perioperative blood loss—averaging 911.3 ml, with approximately 84.5% classified as HBL (22). Furthermore, HBL after intramedullary nailing for intertrochanteric fractures has been shown to exceed intraoperative blood loss significantly (15, 25). Perioperative anemia is an important risk factor for mortality following IF surgery (3, 4). Postoperative anemia exacerbates underlying health conditions, delays functional recovery, and increases postoperative mortality rates (26, 27). Patients with postoperative anemia often present with multiple comorbidities, such as congestive heart failure and chronic anemia, which significantly limit their ability to tolerate any compensatory decline in oxygen-carrying capacity. This context is crucial for understanding the impact of postoperative anemia on mortality in these patients (3, 4, 26, 27).

TXA is an antifibrinolytic agent that acts by binding to the lysine-binding sites of plasminogen, thereby inhibiting the breakdown of fibrin clots. TXA is frequently used in orthopedic procedures, particularly in joint arthroplasty (6, 28). Despite its well-established cost-effectiveness in minimizing blood loss during elective surgical procedures, concerns remain regarding its efficacy and, more importantly, its safety in the context of fracture repair (29). Previous research has largely focused on the use of TXA in various surgical fields; however, its specific application in IF has not been adequately addressed (3033). Our prior study also demonstrated that a sequential intravenous TXA regimen in elderly patients with IF undergoing surgery helped maintain hemoglobin levels and reduce transfusion rates (34). In the present meta-analysis, the amount of HBL in the TXA group was significantly lower than in the control group (SMD = −0.59; 95% CI, −0.74 to −0.45). The pooled results also showed that TBL in the TXA group was significantly lower than in the control group (SMD = −0.74; 95% CI, −0.91 to −0.58). The transfusion rate in the TXA group was 27.4% (84/307), compared with 51.6% (163/316) in the control group. The pooled results demonstrated that the transfusion rate in the TXA group was significantly lower than in the control group (RR = 0.50; 95% CI, 0.35–0.72). This study represents a meaningful advancement in understanding the role of TXA in reducing HBL among elderly patients with IF. Our findings show that TXA not only significantly reduces hidden and total blood loss but also decreases the need for blood transfusion. These findings are consistent with a previous meta-analysis by Jiakai Zhang et al. (24), which similarly found no increased risk of adverse events associated with transfusion.

Although evidence supports the efficacy of TXA in reducing blood loss, concerns have been raised regarding a potential increase in thrombotic events. One report noted a vascular event rate of 16% in the TXA group vs. 6% in the placebo group within six weeks postoperatively (35). However, the difference was not statistically significant (35). A randomized controlled trial by Gang Luo et al. (16) similarly reported no significant difference in the incidence of thromboembolic events between groups receiving repeated intravenous doses of TXA in elderly patients with IF. Additionally, a recent meta-analysis (36) involving 1,397 patients with IF—699 of whom received intravenous TXA and 698 received normal saline—concluded that TXA administration was safe and did not increase the risk of thromboembolic events. In our study, the incidence of DVT in the lower limbs was 7.4% (27/353) in the TXA group and 6.5% (24/372) in the control group. The pooled analysis showed no significant difference in thromboembolic events (DVT, RR = 1.19; 95% CI, 0.68–2.09 and PE, RR = 0.98; 95% CI 0.45–2.12) between the TXA and control groups. These findings are consistent with previous study results.

Furthermore, our results corroborate the findings of Veronique et al. (37), who reported that TXA effectively reduced blood loss in patients undergoing hip arthroplasty, thereby reinforcing its potential benefits in geriatric populations. The implications of our findings extend to both clinical practice and policy development in the management of intertrochanteric fractures. The significant reductions in hidden blood loss and transfusion rates suggest that TXA may serve as a valuable adjunct therapy in this patient population, potentially improving postoperative outcomes and lowering healthcare costs associated with transfusion. Incorporating TXA into standard surgical protocols for elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures may enhance recovery trajectories and mitigate complications related to perioperative blood loss, which are particularly concerning in this vulnerable population (38, 39). These findings support the broader adoption of TXA in clinical guidelines and promote evidence-based practices aimed at improving patient outcomes and optimizing healthcare resource utilization.

4.1 Limitations

This study is not without limitations. Although the analysis incorporated predominantly high-quality, level I evidence, the relatively small sample size—eight RCTs comprising 735 patients—may limit the generalizability of our findings. Additionally, some studies included follow-up durations of only one month, providing insufficient data to evaluate long-term outcomes. The short follow-up period restricts our ability to assess delayed complications associated with TXA use. Future research should aim to conduct larger, multicenter trials with extended follow-up to further validate the safety and efficacy of TXA in this clinical context. Furthermore, in the current meta-analysis, patients in the intervention group received intravenous TXA, but the optimal dosage and timing of administration to minimize blood loss remain unclear. Regarding the possibility of a sub-group analysis, we initially considered this; however, the sample size and the variability in patient demographics and surgical procedures limited our ability to conduct a meaningful sub-group analysis. The type of IF and the experience and expertise of the operating surgeon can influence per operative blood loss in IF. Despite these constraints, our analysis incorporated the most recent high-quality RCTs, and the findings were supported by robust statistical evidence.

In conclusion, this meta-analysis demonstrates that TXA significantly reduces hidden blood loss, total blood loss, and transfusion requirements in patients with intertrochanteric femoral fractures, without increasing the risk of thromboembolic events. These findings support the clinical use of TXA as an effective strategy for minimizing perioperative blood loss and transfusion dependency. However, further investigation is warranted to assess TXA's efficacy across different patient subgroups and treatment strategies, thereby strengthening its role in improving surgical outcomes in this vulnerable geriatric population.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Author contributions

YM: Writing – original draft. YZ: Data curation, Writing – review & editing. HX: Supervision, Writing – review & editing. ND: Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing. ZL: Validation, Writing – review & editing. QW: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing. YL: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2025.1681209/full#supplementary-material

References

1. Wang Y, Wang Z, Chen B, Chen B, Fang R, Zeng H, et al. Global epidemiology of lower limb fractures: trends, burden, and projections from the GBD 2021 study. Bone. (2025) 193:117420. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2025.117420

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Lou L, Xu L, Wang X, Xia C, Dai J, Hu L. Comprehensive assessment of risk factors and development of novel predictive tools for perioperative hidden blood loss in intertrochanteric femoral fractures: a multivariate retrospective analysis. Eur J Med Res. (2024) 29:626. doi: 10.1186/s40001-024-02244-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Lu Y, Huang Q, Xu Y, Ren C, Sun L, Dong W, et al. Predictors of long-term mortality after intertrochanteric fractures surgery: a 3-year retrospective study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. (2022) 23:472. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05442-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Stacey J, Bush C, DiPasquale T. The hidden blood loss in proximal femur fractures is sizeable and significant. J Clin Orthop Trauma. (2021) 16:239–43. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2021.02.012

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Arshi A, Lai WC, Iglesias BC, McPherson EJ, Zeegen EN, Stavrakis AI, et al. Blood transfusion rates and predictors following geriatric hip fracture surgery. Hip Int. (2021) 31:272–9. doi: 10.1177/1120700019897878

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Fahmy M, Karim MA, Abdelazeem AH, Abdelrazek AM. Intravenous injection of tranexamic acid in patients with pelvic fractures: a prospective randomized trial. Hip Pelvis. (2025) 37:64–71. doi: 10.5371/hp.2025.37.1.64

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Mutlu T, Arıcan M, Karaduman ZO, Turhan Y, Kaban İ, Dalaslan RE, et al. Effect of oral + topical and only topical tranaxamic acid application on blood loss and postoperative transfusion in primary total hip arthroplasty. J Clin Med. (2025) 14:1275. doi: 10.3390/jcm14041275

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Zouche I, Ketata S, Sallemi A, Bousarsar M, Sahnoun N, Keskes M, et al. [Effects of desmopressin versus tranexamic acid on reducing bleeding in knee arthroplasty: a double-blind randomized study]. Pan Afr Med J. (2024) 49:67. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2024.49.67.43551

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Wakasa J, Iwakiri K, Ohta Y, Minoda Y, Kobayashi A, Nakamura H. Perioperative bleeding control in total hip arthroplasty: hemostatic powder vs. Tranexamic acid-a prospective randomized controlled trial. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. (2024) 144:3797–805. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05475-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Br Med J. (2021) 372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Chandler J, Welch VA, Higgins JP, et al. Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (2019) 10:ED000142. doi: 10.1002/14651858.ED000142

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Wang H, Wang Y, Lü Z, Li P, Wang S, Wang Y. Effect of repeated intravenous tranexamic acid in the perioperative period of proximal femoral nail antirotation for femoral intertrochanteric fracture. Chin J Tissue Eng Res. (2021) 25:3319–23.

Google Scholar

13. Tian S, Shen Z, Liu Y, Zhang Y, Peng A. The effect of tranexamic acid on hidden bleeding in older intertrochanteric fracture patients treated with PFNA. Injury. (2018) 49:680–4. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.01.026

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Zhou XD, Zhang Y, Jiang LF, Zhang JJ, Zhou D, Wu LD, et al. Efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid in intertrochanteric fractures: a single-blind randomized controlled trial. Orthop Surg. (2019) 11:635–42. doi: 10.1111/os.12511

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Zhu C, Ji Z, Zhu J, Xu H, Li S, Liu C, et al. Perioperative administration of tranexamic acid and low molecular weight heparin for enhanced blood management in intertrochanteric fractures: a randomized controlled study. Med Sci Monit. (2024) 30:e944063. doi: 10.12659/MSM.944063

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Luo G, Liu J, Ni W, Huang W. The role of post-traumatic antifibrinolysis in the perioperative blood management of elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures treated with PFNA: a randomised controlled trial. Injury. (2024) 55:111877. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2024.111877

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Ekinci M, Ok M, Ersin M, Günen E, Kocazeybek E, Sırma SÖ, et al. A single dose of tranexamic acid infusion is safe and effective to reduce total blood loss during proximal femoral nailing for intertrochanteric fractures: a prospective randomized study. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. (2022) 28:1627–33. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2022.67137

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Lei J, Zhang B, Cong Y, Zhuang Y, Wei X, Fu Y, et al. Tranexamic acid reduces hidden blood loss in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures with PFNA: a single-center randomized controlled trial. J Orthop Surg Res. (2017) 12:124. doi: 10.1186/s13018-017-0625-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Zhang S, Xiao C, Yu W, Long N, He F, Cai P, et al. Tranexamic acid safely reduces hidden blood loss in patients undergoing intertrochanteric fracture surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. (2022) 48:731–41. doi: 10.1007/s00068-020-01387-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Miller ND, Cho T, Gokula L, Liu J. Intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly treated with different intramedullary devices: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on comparison studies. JBJS Rev. (2025) 13. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.24.00203

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Ricci WM. Stability of intertrochanteric femur fractures. J Orthop Trauma. (2023) 37:S1–1S4. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002675

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Yang X, Wu Q, Wang X. Investigation of perioperative hidden blood loss of unstable intertrochanteric fracture in the elderly treated with different intramedullary fixations. Injury. (2017) 48:1848–52. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.06.017

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Wei H, Xiao Q, He J, Huang T, Xu W, Xian S, et al. Effect and safety of topical application of tranexamic acid to reduce perioperative blood loss in elderly patients with intertrochanteric fracture undergoing PFNA. Medicine (Baltimore). (2021) 100:e27123. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000027123

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Zhang J, Fan X, Zheng Y, Wu J, Yuan X. Intravenous application of tranexamic acid in intramedullary nailing for the treatment of geriatric intertrochanteric fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. (2023) 24:614. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06725-y

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Boonyanuwat W, Noree N, Kongmalai P. Comparative efficacy in pertrochanteric fractures: a randomized controlled trial of the shortest versus Various short-length cephalomedullary nails. Adv Orthop. (2025) 2025:6689145. doi: 10.1155/aort/6689145

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Shander A, Javidroozi M, Naqvi S, Aregbeyen O, Caylan M, Demir S, et al. An update on mortality and morbidity in patients with very low postoperative hemoglobin levels who decline blood transfusion (CME). Transfusion. (2014) 54:2688–95; quiz 2687. doi: 10.1111/trf.12565

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Vochteloo AJ, Borger van der Burg BL, Mertens B, Niggebrugge AH, de Vries MR, Tuinebreijer WE, et al. Outcome in hip fracture patients related to anemia at admission and allogeneic blood transfusion: an analysis of 1262 surgically treated patients. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. (2011) 12:262. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-262

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Pfister RM, Pfister BF, Hager RL, Sandholtz N, Abulafia D, Bradshaw D. From research to practice: bridging the implementation gap on the use of tranexamic acid in total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg Res. (2025) 20:111. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05475-y

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Lin ZX, Woolf SK. Safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of tranexamic acid in orthopedic surgery. Orthopedics. (2016) 39:119–30. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20160301-05

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Zhao YK, Zhang C, Zhang YW, Li RY, Xie T, Bai LY, et al. Efficacy and safety of orally and intravenously administration of tranexamic acid in patients with elderly femoral neck fracture. Orthop Surg. (2024) 16:1581–91. doi: 10.1111/os.14089

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Ahmed F, Chatterji G, Agrawal U, Ankitha KS, Shukla S. Does multiple intravenous tranexamic acid doses in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty using kinematic alignment without tourniquet application show any difference in blood loss. Transfusion requirements and hospital stays: a randomized controlled study. J Orthop Case Rep. (2025) 15:281–8. doi: 10.13107/jocr.2025.v15.i03.5412

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Artykbay S, Susantitaphong P, Tantavisut S. Efficacy and safety of topical tranexamic acid in elderly hip fractures undergoing surgical treatment: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Orthop Surg. (2025) 17:16–28. doi: 10.4055/cios24184

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Sönmez E, Gökmen MY, Pazarcı Ö. The effects of prophylactic administration of tranexamic acid on the operative time and the amount of blood transfused during open fixation of pelvis and acetabulum fractures. J Orthop Surg Res. (2024) 19:606. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-05100-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Cui Y, Lu Y, Huang Q, Zhang C, Sun L, Ren C, et al. Clinical application effects of different preoperative blood management schemes in older patients with delayed intertrochanteric fracture surgery. Clin Interv Aging. (2022) 17:825–35. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S362020

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Zufferey PJ, Miquet M, Quenet S, Martin P, Adam P, Albaladejo P, et al. Tranexamic acid in hip fracture surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Br J Anaesth. (2010) 104:23–30. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep314

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Klingemann CA, Lauritzen JB, Jørgensen HL. Efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid use on postoperative blood transfusion in hip fracture patients- a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. (2025) 51:164. doi: 10.1007/s00068-025-02846-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. van Rijckevorsel V, Roukema GR, Kuijper TM, de Jong L. Clinical outcomes of tranexamic acid in acute hip hemiarthroplasties in frail geriatric patients. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. (2022) 108:103219. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2022.103219

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Davis SL, Solomito MJ, Kumar M. Intravenous versus locally injected tranexamic acid in a fragility hip fracture population: a retrospective review. J Orthop Trauma. (2024) 38:e79–84. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002737

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Shah FA, Naeemullah Ali MA, Iqbal MJ. Efficacy of preoperative tranexamic acid in patients undergoing intertrochanteric hip fracture surgery: a randomized placebo controlled trial. Pak J Med Sci. (2023) 39:1601–5. doi: 10.12669/pjms.39.6.7667

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: intertrochanteric fractures, tranexamic acid, hidden blood loss, hip fractures, mortality

Citation: Meng Y, Zhang Y, Xue H, Duan N, Li Z, Wang Q and Lu Y (2025) Impact of tranexamic acid on hidden blood loss in intertrochanteric fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Front. Surg. 12:1681209. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1681209

Received: 7 August 2025; Accepted: 20 October 2025;
Published: 24 November 2025.

Edited by:

Plinio Cirillo, University of Naples Federico II, Italy

Reviewed by:

Faaiz Ali Shah, Lady Reading Hospital, Pakistan
Taiceer Abdulwahab, Mediclinic City Hospital, United Arab Emirates

Copyright: © 2025 Meng, Zhang, Xue, Duan, Li, Wang and Lu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Qian Wang, cWlhbnl1bnFpbGFpQDE2My5jb20=; Yao Lu, ZHJsdXlhb0AxNjMuY29t

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.