Validation of Three Different Sterilization Methods of Tilapia Skin Dressing: Impact on Microbiological Enumeration and Collagen Content

Introduction

Biological dressings, such as amnion, allografts, xenografts, bioengineered tissues, and cultured-wound healing cells, have been used recently for topical treatment of burns and skin wounds (1). Collagen dressings are widely used due to their beneficial properties including low antigenicity, enhanced inflammation and hemostasis, and accelerated fibroplasia and epithelization (2). Collagen dressings derived from cattle and pig skin or chicken waste are inappropriate due to the risk of disease transmission or religious and cultural reasons (3, 4). Marine fish skin is a good source of collagen, with antibacterial and antioxidant properties due to collagen peptides and omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids, particularly eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA). Thus, it is unlikely to be a source of infectious disease (3, 5–8).

The use of Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) skin as a potential natural material in the management of burns and wounds arose because of its collagenous, histological, and mechanical comparability to human skin (9–11). Tilapia skin is a readily available, quality, safe, inexpensive material that is easy to apply (12). Nile tilapia skin also has a high level of biocompatibility in nature as the collagen extract is a biocompatible type I collagen with potential as a biomedical material for use in clinical regenerative medicine (13–16).

The sterilization of wound dressings before use on a patient is critical to guarantee the well-being of the patient and the healing process of the skin wound. Ordinary methods used to sterilize skin grafts are ethylene oxide gas sterilization, irradiation, and chemical sterilization (17–19). Ethylene oxide is a toxic gas which likewise generates harmful reaction products with potential hazards to the patient (20, 21). Sterilization of skin grafts with irradiation worsened the structure of the skin matrix since it can cause collagen matrix cross-linking or breakage of the peptide bonds within the collagen molecules (22). Unlike mammalian skin grafts, which require harsh chemical sterilization, Tilapia skin grafts require a gentle processing method because the colony forming units found in the tilapia skin samples suggested the existence of a normal, non-infectious microbiota (23). However, the fish skin may be contaminated with different microorganisms, such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Aeromonas sobria, Klebsiella pneumonie, Enterococus faecalis, Aeromonas hydrophila, Proteus mirabilis, Globicatella sanguinis, Aeromonas veronii, Streptococcus uberis, Candida parapsilosis, and Streptococcus suis from water environment or other sources of contamination (23, 24).

Chlorhexidine and povidone iodine are routinely used for sterilization and disinfection of grafting procedures as they are effective against Gram-negative, Gram-positive bacteria and fungi and kill by disruption of the cell membrane (17, 25–28). Silver nanoparticles have long been known as an antimicrobial agent and are used as silver-containing wound dressings and for disinfection of the wound graft (19, 29).

An effective sterilization method must eliminate or minimize microbial populations without changing the structure, bioactive composition, or biocompatibility of the skin grafts (17–19). To author's knowledge, there is a lack of studies on fish skin sterilization methods and effects on structure or function (17). The study purpose is to compare microbial count, collagen properties and histology of fish skin following three different sterilization times and methods.

Materials and Methods

Fish Skin Collection

Tilapia skin was collected from fresh Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fish (700 ± 40 gm, 22 ± 3 cm standard length), obtained from The Aquatic Medicine Unit's tanks, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt. The fish were euthanized physically by decapitation according to The American Association of Zoo Veterinarians (AAZV) Guidelines for euthanasia (30). Fresh skin samples were obtained by sharp and blunt dissection from the underlying muscles and washed with a sterile normal saline solution to remove any trace of blood and other impurities. The skin samples were then placed into a sterile normal saline solution and transected into strips 3 × 3 cm. Tilapia skin strips were immediately subjected to three different sterilization procedures (three skin samples in triplicate for each treatment), each at three contact times (5, 10, and 15 min) as described below.

Sterilization Procedures

Sterilization procedures were carried out using three different sterilizing agents; the chlorhexidine gluconate 4% (CHG) (Hibiclens Mölnlycke Health Care, Norcross, GA), povidone iodine 10% (PVP-I) (BETADINE, El- Nile Co. for Pharmaceutical and Chemical Industries, Egypt), and silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) (25 μg/mL). The Tilapia skin strips were allocated randomly into four main groups (3 skin strips for each); CHG, PVP-I, and AgNPs groups. Each group was then incubated for different contact time points (5, 10, and 15 min). In addition to a control group (C) treated with normal saline for the three different times. The tilapia skin strips were subjected to bacteriological and histological evaluation following each sterilization treatment at the indicated time points.

Preparation of Silver Nanoparticles

Stable silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) <100 nm were synthesized in a typical one-step protocol as described before (31). Briefly, 1.0 g of soluble starch was added to 100 mL of deionized water and heated until complete dissolution. One milliliter of 100 mM aqueous solution of silver nitrate (AgNO₃) crystal (ACS AgNO₃, F.W 169, 87 Gamma laboratory chemicals, Sigma-Aldrich, Germany, Assay: Min 99.0%) was added and stirred well. This mixture was put into a dark glass bottle and autoclaved. The resulting solution was clear yellow in color indicating the silver nanoparticles formation.

The stock solution of AgNPs was kept in dark glass bottles away from direct sunlight and at room temperature (25°C). The concentration and size of the particles were measured before using. The morphology and size of AgNPs were measured by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (JEOL-JEM-100CX II) at the Electron Microscopy Unit, Assiut University (Supplementary Figure 1). The concentration of AgNPs stock was measured by Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption Model 210VGP at the Faculty of Science, Assiut University.

Microbiological Evaluation

Microbiological evaluation of the fish skin strips was performed according to APHA (32) and Qazi et al. (33). An area of 3 × 3 cm² was aseptically swabbed for microbial count. Each of Plate count agar “HMESIA- Ref -M091A,” Manitol Salt Agar “Oxoid CM0085,” MacConkey Agar OMRI W/O Crystal violet “Biolife “and Difco^TM Potato Dextrose Agar- Ref 213400 were used for Total viable bacteria, Staphylococci, Coliforms, Yeasts and Molds count, respectively. The Pour plate method was used for the enumeration of colony-forming units (CFU/cm²) on Plate Count Agar. The swab was transferred immediately into 10 ml sterile nutrient broth. One milliliter from the broth was transferred aseptically into a sterilized petri-dish in triplicate. Ten to fifteen milliliter of the dissolved Plate count agar media was cooled in water bath to a temperature of 44–46°C and poured aseptically into each plate. The dish was moved in a circular motion several times to ensure homogeneity of the sample with the medium. The plate was left until the hardening of the medium, and then incubated upside down in the incubator at a temperature of 37°C for 24 h. After incubation period the total number of each replicate of the sample was counted and the mean extracted and multiplied by the inverse of dilution. The resulting colonies expressed as CFU/ml. The same technique was used for Staphylococci, Coliforms, Yeasts and Molds count. Staphylococcal count was plated on Manitol Salt Agar “Oxoid CM0085” at 37°C for 24 h, Coliform count on MacConkey Agar OMRI W/O Crystal violet “Biolife at 37°C for 18–24 h, and Yeasts and Molds was plated on Difco^TM Potato Dextrose Agar- Ref 213400 incubated at 28 ± 2°C for 24–72 h.

Sterilization Efficiency

The efficiency of each sterilization procedure was calculated by comparing the bacterial count before and after each treatment for each contact time via the following equation:

Disinfection efficacy % = (C₀ – C)/C₀ × 100, where (C₀) is the initial bacterial count (control negative) and (C) is the count of bacteria after a certain contact time of the sterilizing agent (34).

Histological Evaluation

Specimens (0.5 × 0.5 cm) of the Tilapia skin strips were collected from the groups following each sterilization treatment at different times and fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin. The formalin-fixed skin samples were routinely processed and embedded in paraffin. They were then sectioned at 5 μm thickness and stained with Mayer's hematoxylin (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and eosin (Sigma, Missouri, USA). Afterwards, the slides were examined microscopically and the histological evaluation was performed in a blind fashion on coded samples, and a comparison was made with the sections from the control-treated group. Histological evaluation to assess integrity and organization of collagen fibers was based on 0–3 scale (35, 36). Collagen integrity scores: 0 = continue, long fiber, 1 = slightly fragmented, 2 = moderately fragmented, 3 = severely fragmented. Collagen organization scores: 0 = compact and parallel, 1 = slightly loose and wave, 2 = moderately loose, wavy and cross to each other, 3 = no identifiable pattern.

Histochemical Staining of Collagen

Sirius red stain was used for evaluation of the collagen content (37). Paraffin-embedded sections were deparaffinized in xylene and rehydrated in a graded series of ethanol solutions [into 0.1 M phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), pH 7.2] to distilled water. The sections were then stained with Sirius red stain following the manufacturer's protocol, dehydrated in graded alcohol, made transparent with xylene, and mounted. Afterwards, slides were observed under the microscope to check for collagen staining with red color. The collagen content was evaluated according to the depth of the red color.

Using threshold area fraction determination, the percentage of collagen positive area was calculated using ImageJ (17). The amount of collagen was reported as a percentage from the total number of pixels in the optical view as a percentage and expressed as mean ± SEM.

Negative Image Study Using CMEIAS Color Segmentation

An improved computing technology has been used to process color images by segmenting background object pixels from the foreground object (38, 39), making this technique especially useful due to the complex color that existed for this analysis.

Statistical Analyses and Software

Statistical analyses were performed by one-way ANOVA using GraphPad Prism software version 5.03 (GraphPad Software Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). P-values of < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Figures were generated using Adobe Photoshop CS6 and Prism 5 version 5.03.

Results

Microbiological Evaluation of the Treated Skin

The effectiveness of chlorhexidine gluconate 4%, povidone iodine 10%, and silver nanoparticles (25 μg/mL) on the microbial count of the fish skin at the different three contact time points was summarized in Table 1. The silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) achieved a 100% reduction percentage against aerobic bacterial, Staphylococcal, Coliform, and Yeast and Mold counts throughout the treatment time points (5, 10, 15 min). However, povidone-iodine achieved a 100% reduction against the Coliform and Yeast and Mold counts at the contact time of 10 min, and against the aerobic bacterial and Staphylococcal counts at the contact time of 15 min. Chlorhexidine gluconate achieved 100% reduction against Staphylococcal and Yeast and Mold counts after the treatment time of 15 min.

TABLE 1

Table 1. Mean value of microbial count before and after application of antiseptics.

Histological Evaluation of the Treated Fish Skin

Histological analysis of the fish skin samples from the control group showed compactly arranged bundles of collagen fibers in the dermis and occasionally focal epithelial coating and superficial melanophores were seen. The collagen fibers were well organized and distributed in a parallel pattern with no evidence of disaggregation (Figures 1A,B).

FIGURE 1

Figure 1. Histological and histochemical evaluation of Tilapia fish skin in the control group (treated with normal saline). (A,B) Hematoxylin and eosin stained sections. (C) Sirius red stained sections for collagen. (D) Negative image for (C) using CMEIAS Color Segmentation. The scale bars in (A) = 100 μm and (B–D) = 50 μm.

Fish skin treated with CHG for 5 min showed well organized and parallel collagen fibers (Figures 2A,B) with mild changes in the collagen fibers after 10 min treatment (Figures 2E,F). However, disorganized and disaggregated collagen fibers were obviously seen after 15 min treatment (Figures 2I,J,5) (P < 0.0001).

FIGURE 2

Figure 2. Histological and histochemical evaluation of Tilapia fish skin in the chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) group. Hematoxylin and eosin stained sections treated with CHG for 5 min (A,B), 10 min (E,F), and 15 min (I,J). (C,G,K) Sirius red stained sections for collagen. (D,H,I) Negative images for (C,G,K), respectively, using CMEIAS Color Segmentation. The scale bars in (A,E,I) = 100 μm and (B–D,F–H,J–L) = 50 μm.

In the PVP-I-treated group, the structure of the collagen fibers has not been changed after 5 min treatment (Figures 3A,B). Disorganization and disaggregation of the collagen fibers were observed after 10 min and 15 min treatment and were more prominent at 15 min treatment (Figures 3E,F,I,J,5) (P < 0.0001).

FIGURE 3

Figure 3. Histological and histochemical evaluation of Tilapia fish skin in the povidone iodine (PVP-I) group. Hematoxylin and eosin stained sections treated with PVP-I for 5 min (A,B), 10 min (E,F), and 15 min (I,J). (C,G,K) Sirius red stained sections for collagen. (D,H,I) Negative images for (C,G,K), respectively, using CMEIAS Color Segmentation. The scale bars in (A,E,I) = 100 μm and (B–D,F–H, J–L) = 50 μm.

However, there was no change in the organization pattern of disaggregation of the collagen fibers in the AgNPs-treated group after 5–15 min treatment in comparing with control samples (Figures 4A,B,E,F,I,J).

FIGURE 4

Figure 4. Histological and histochemical evaluation of Tilapia fish skin in the silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) (25 μg/mL) group. Hematoxylin and eosin stained sections treated with AgNPs for 5 min (A,B), 10 min (E,F), and 15 min (I,J). (C,G,K) Sirius red stained sections for collagen. (D,H,I) Negative images for (C,G,K), respectively, using CMEIAS Color Segmentation. The scale bars in (A,E,I) = 100 μm and (B–D,F–H,J–L) = 50 μm.

Histochemical Evaluation of the Treated Fish Skin

We further examined the organization of the collagen fibers by staining the skin samples from the control and treated groups with Sirius red stain and measured the collagen intensity in the fish skin using ImageJ. The fish skin treated with CHG for 5 min (Figures 2C,D) or PVP-I for 5 min (Figures 3C,D) showed well-organized of the collagen fibers and the preservation of the collagen intensity compared to control samples (Figures 1C,D). There was mild change in the disposition pattern of collagen fibers and the collagen intensity after sterilization for 10 min with CHG (Figures 2G,H, 5) or PVP-I (Figures 3G,H,5). However, the reduction in intensity of the collagen in the fish skin was statistically significant (P < 0.0001) after sterilization for 15 min with CHG or PVP-I (Figures 2K,L,3K,L,5). On the other hand, the sterilization of the fish skin with AgNPs showed well organized collagen fibers (Figures 4C,D,G,H,K,L) with non-significant change in the intensity of the collagen (Figure 5), regardless of the treated time.

FIGURE 5

Figure 5. Evaluation of the collagen integrity, organization, and intensity in Tilapia fish skin under various sterilization methods. Collagen integrity (A) and organization (B) were evaluated based on 0–3 scale as described in the materials and methods. The collagen intensity (C) was quantified using ImageJ. The results are expressed as a percentage from the total number of pixels, and are normalized to control-treated group. Differences were evaluated using one-way ANOVA. **p < 0.001; ***p < 0.0001.

Discussion

Use of Tilapia skin xenografts as a biologic dressing for wound management is expanding (1). The fish skin is characterized by large amounts of moisture and collagen proteins at levels comparable to human skin. This prevents scarring while promoting the healing of wounds. In addition, unlike the gauze bandages, the tilapia skin does not need to be changed every day (3, 5, 6, 9–11).

Critical to fish skin use is applying a sterilization process with minimal impact on its positive qualities, especially with respect to zoonotic disease. The zoonotic diseases associated with fish contact are primarily bacterial infections. Most persons have been infected via an existing wound or fresh puncture wound while handling live or dead fish. These include Mycobacterium, Erysipelothrix, Campylobacter, Aeromonas, Vibrio, Edwardsiella, Escherichia, Salmonella, Klebsiella, and Streptococcus iniae (40–43). Therefore, the present study compared three different sterilization procedures; chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG), povidone iodine (PVP-I), and silver nanoparticles (AgNPs). Our results indicated that AgNPs are more efficient in reducing the microbial counts and preserving the structural components of the fish skin, thereby fulfilling the ideal sterilization agent requirement.

CHG has been used to disinfect the skin before surgery and sterilize surgical instruments and biological dressings (17, 28, 44). Consistent with previous data (17), our results showed that 4% CHG was effective in the reduction of microbial load of tilapia fish skin in variable degrees and the bactericidal effect increased with increasing contact time. CHG is a bisbiguanide compound that has a broad spectrum of activity against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria and fungi, even in the presence of interfering materials, such as blood or serum (25, 44). It dissociates and releases the positively charged chlorhexidine cation. In turn, this cation binds to the negatively charged bacterial cell walls resulting in leakage of cellular contents, precipitation of intracellular compounds, and inhibition of adenosine triphosphate, which eventually inactivate or kill the bacteria (25, 44). In this study, complete inhibition of microbial contamination of fish skin was not achieved even with increasing the contact time till 15 min. This may be attributed to the fact that CHG is a more potent antiseptic against gram-positive than gram-negative bacteria and the development of resistance to gram-negative bacteria such as Pseudomonas spp. (45, 46).

On the other hand, the arrangement and content of the collagen fibers were not affected after CHG treatment for 5 min. However, long exposure to CHG for 10 or 15 min resulted in dissociation and disintegration of collagen fibers with decrease in the collagen intensity. Our results are in accordance with that reported by Alomar et al. (25) and are contradictory to Alves et al. (17).

PVP-I is routinely used as an antiseptic agent with a broad spectrum activity against bacteria, fungi, and yeast. It is a complex of polyvinylpyrrolidone iodine that gradually releases iodine as a free iodine, which provides antimicrobial efficacy through lipid iodination and oxidation of cytoplasmic and membrane compounds. Additionally, polyvinylpyrrolidone has a high affinity for cell membranes, supplying free iodine directly to the target cell and contributing to rapid microbial kill (44, 47, 48).

The current study demonstrated that fish skin treated with PVP-I had significantly reduced microbial count up to 100% by increasing the contact time up to 15 min. These findings were in accordance with Mann-Salinas et al. (28). Although PVP-I has a minimal toxic potential compared to CHG, it also induced alterations in the collagen fibers (dissociation and disintegration of collagen fibers) of the tilapia fish skin treated with PVP-I for 10 or 15 min, while, these changes were not noted in skin samples submitted for 5 min treatment.

Silver has been widely used in chronic wounds and burns care. Moreover, a number of silver-impregnated dressings have been developed (49–52). Silver has broad spectrum antimicrobial properties against a wide spectrum of gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. It binds to negatively charged components in proteins and nucleic acids, thereby effecting structural changes in bacterial cell walls, membranes, and nucleic acids that affect viability. It is believed that it inhibits proteins by binding to and denaturing their thiol groups and preventing DNA replication by its condensation (49–52). Therefore, silver impregnation of biological-derived wound dressings has been recently used and it has been reported that silver impregnation of amniotic membranes combats microbial infection without any change on the physical characteristics (19, 29).

Interestingly, the microbial growth was rapidly and completely vanished by using AgNPs as an antiseptic for fish skin at all used treatment times (5–15 min) compared to CHG or PVP-I. Furthermore, the rapid antimicrobial activity of AgNPs is an obvious option so that the operative time is not extended beyond the minimum necessary.

By controlling the bioburden, AgNPs facilitate less toxic metabolites production, which result in a better collagen fibers preservation in the Tilapia skin. Furthermore, eukaryotic cells are less prone to silver toxicity than prokaryotes, which is thought due to an increased degree of structural and functional stability in eukaryotes (53). However, it should be noted that this study has a potential limitation, the storage of the fish skin after processing and sterilization. Therefore, further studies should address the storage and preservation of the sterilized fish skin samples.

Conclusion

Sterilization of Tilapia fish skin, used as a biological dressing, using AgNPs is effective with a 100% reduction against microbial growth and without any change in the collagen content at three different times (5, 10, and 15 min). This is the first study to report the excellent performance of AgNPs as a quick and efficient sterilizer procedure for the Tilapia fish skin, relevant for clinical use as a biological dressing.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics Statement

The animal study was reviewed and approved by National Ethical Committee of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt.

Author Contributions

AI, SK, and MS designed the study, helped data interpretation, discussed the results, and edited the manuscript. AI, SK, NK, and MS performed the experiments. AI, SK, DH, and MS analyzed the data. MS wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2020.597751/full#supplementary-material

Supplementary Figure 1. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) micrograph of silver nanoparticles showing spherical-shaped particles ranging from 8 to 35 nm (scale bar = 100 nm).

References

1. Gomez JH, Hanson RR. Use of dressings and bandages in equine wound management. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract. (2005) 21:91–104. doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2004.11.004

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Shettigar UR, Jagannathan R, Natarajan R. Collagen film for burn dressings reconstituted from animal intestines. Artif Organs. (1982) 6:256–60. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.1982.tb01670.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Hu Z, Yang P, Zhou C, Li S, Hong P. Marine collagen peptides from the skin of Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus): characterization and wound healing evaluation. Mar Drugs. (2017) 15:102. doi: 10.3390/md15040102

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Potaros T, Raksakulthai N, Runglerdkreangkrai J, Worawattanamateekul W. Characteristics of collagen from nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) skin isolated by two different methods. Kasetsart J. (2009) 43:584–93.

Google Scholar

5. Ennas N, Hammami R, Gomaa A, Bédard F, Biron É, Subirade M, et al. Collagencin, an antibacterial peptide from fish collagen: activity, structure and interaction dynamics with membrane. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. (2016) 473:642–7. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.03.121

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Wang B, Wang YM, Chi CF, Luo HY, Deng SG, Ma JY. Isolation and characterization of collagen and antioxidant collagen peptides from scales of Croceine Croaker (Pseudosciaena crocea). Mar Drugs. (2013) 11:4641–61. doi: 10.3390/md11114641

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Anderson EJ, Thayne KA, Harris M, Raza Shaikh S, Darden TM, Lark DS, et al. Do fish oil omega-3 fatty acids enhance antioxidant capacity and mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation in human atrial myocardium via PPARγ activation. Antioxidants Redox Signal. (2014) 21:1156–63. doi: 10.1089/ars.2014.5888

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Sakai C, Ishida M, Ohba H, Yamashita H, Uchida H, Yoshizumi M, et al. Fish oil omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids attenuate oxidative stress-induced DNA damage in vascular endothelial cells. PLoS ONE. (2017) 12:e0187934. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187934

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Guo ZQ, Qiu L, Gao Y, Li JH, Zhang XH, Yang XL, et al. Use of porcine acellular dermal matrix following early dermabrasion reduces length of stay in extensive deep dermal burns. Burns. (2016) 42:598–604. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2015.10.018

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Mathangi Ramakrishnan K, Babu M, Mathivanan Jayaraman V, Shankar J. Advantages of collagen based biological dressings in the management of superficial and superficial partial thickness burns in children. Ann Burns Fire Disasters. (2013) 26:98–104.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

11. Norbury W, Herndon DN, Tanksley J, Jeschke MG, Finnerty CC. Infection in burns. Surg Infect. (2016) 17:250–5. doi: 10.1089/sur.2013.134

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Costa BA, Lima Júnior EM, de Moraes Filho MO, Fechine FV, de Moraes MEA, Silva Júnior FR, et al. Use of Tilapia skin as a xenograft for pediatric burn treatment: a case report. J Burn Care Res. (2019) 40:714–7. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irz085

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Pati F, Datta P, Adhikari B, Dhara S, Ghosh K, Mohapatra PKD. Collagen scaffolds derived from fresh water fish origin and their biocompatibility. J Biomed Mater Res Part A. (2012) 100A:1068–79. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.33280

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Yamada S, Yamamoto K, Ikeda T, Yanagiguchi K, Hayashi Y. Potency of fish collagen as a scaffold for regenerative medicine. Biomed Res Int. (2014) 2014:302932. doi: 10.1155/2014/302932

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Tang J, Saito T. Biocompatibility of novel type I collagen purified from Tilapia Fish scale: an in vitro comparative study. Biomed Res Int. (2015) 2015:139476. doi: 10.1155/2015/139476

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Song WK, Liu D, Sun LL, Li BA, Hou H. Physicochemical and biocompatibility properties of type I collagen from the skin of Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) for biomedical applications. Mar Drugs. (2019) 17:137. doi: 10.3390/md17030137

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Alves APNN, Lima Júnior EM, Piccolo NS, de Miranda MJB, Lima Verde MEQ, Ferreira Júnior AEC, et al. Study of tensiometric properties, microbiological and collagen content in nile tilapia skin submitted to different sterilization methods. Cell Tissue Bank. (2018) 19:373–82. doi: 10.1007/s10561-017-9681-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Chiu T, Burd A. “Xenograft” dressing in the treatment of burns. Clin Dermatol. (2005) 23:419–23. doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2004.07.027

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Kesting MR, Wolff KD, Hohlweg-Majert B, Steinstraesser L. The role of allogenic amniotic membrane in burn treatment. J Burn Care Res. (2008) 29:907–16. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e31818b9e40

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Ge L, Zhang X, Cao C, Gu Z, Liu Z, Liu L, et al. Feasibility study of the sterilization of pigskin used as wound dressings by neutral electrolyzed water. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. (2012) 72:1584–7. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318243a1dc

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Mendes GC, Brandão TR, Silva CL. Ethylene oxide sterilization of medical devices: a review. Am J Infect Control. (2007) 35:574–81. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2006.10.014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Conrad BP, Rappe' M, Horodyski M, Farmer KW, Indelicato PA. The effect of sterilization on mechanical properties of soft tissue allografts. Cell Tissue Bank. (2013) 14:359–66. doi: 10.1007/s10561-012-9340-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Lima Junior EM, Bandeira T de JPG, Miranda MJB, Ferreira GE, Parente EA, Piccolo NS, et al. Characterization of the microbiota of the skin and oral cavity of Oreochromis niloticus. J Heal Biol Sci. (2016) 4:193–7. doi: 10.12662/2317-3076jhbs.v4i3.767.p193-197.2016

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Dosoky R, Kotb S, Farghali M. Efficiency of silver nanoparticles against bacterial contaminants isolated from surface and ground water in Egypt. J Adv Vet Anim Res. (2015) 2:175–84. doi: 10.5455/javar.2015.b79

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Alomar ZA, Gawri R, Roughley PJ, Haglund L, Burman M. The effects of chlorhexidine graft decontamination on tendon graft. Am J Sports Med. (2012) 40:1646–53. doi: 10.1177/0363546512443808

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Bigbie R, Schumacher J, Swaim S, Purohit RC, Wright JC. Effects of amnion and live yeast cell derivative on second-intention healing in horses. Am J Vet Res. (1991) 52:1376–82.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

27. Kim SH, Tan KL, Lee SY, Kim DW, Shin S, Jin HR. Effect of chlorhexidine pretreatment on bacterial contamination at rhinoplasty field. Springerplus. (2016) 5:2116. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-3679-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Mann-Salinas EA, Joyner DD, Guymon CH, Ward CL, Rathbone CR, Jones JA, et al. Comparison of decontamination methods for human skin grafts. J Burn Care Res. (2015) 36:636–40. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000188

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Singh R, Kumar D, Kumar P, Chacharkar MP. Development and evaluation of silver-impregnated amniotic membrane as an antimicrobial burn dressing. J Burn Care Res. (2008) 29:64–72. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e31815f5a0f

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Hartman KH. Fish. In: Baer CK, editor. Guidelines for Euthanasia of Nondomestic Animals. Yulee, FL: American Association of Zoo Veterinarians (AAZV) (2006). 111 p.

Google Scholar

31. Vigneshwaran N, Nachane RP, Balasubramanya RH, Varadarajan PV. A novel one-pot ‘green' synthesis of stable silver nanoparticles using soluble starch. Carbohydr Res. (2006) 341:2012–18. doi: 10.1016/j.carres.2006.04.042

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. APHA (American Public Health Association). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 21st ed. Washington, DC: APHA, Inc (2005).

33. Qazi J, Asif H, Shahid R. Economical method for estimation of bacterial viable count. Pakistan J Zool. (2008) 40:289–94.

Google Scholar

34. Li Y, Leung P, Yao L, Song QW, Newton E. Antimicrobial effect of surgical masks coated with nanoparticles. J Hosp Infect. (2006) 62:58–63. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2005.04.015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Chen J, Yu Q, Wu B, Lin Z, Pavlos NJ, Xu J, et al. Autologous tenocyte therapy for experimental Achilles tendinopathy in a rabbit model. Tissue Eng Part A. (2011) 17:2037–48. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2010.0492

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Farfaras S, Ejerhed LE, Hallström EK, Hultenby K, Mekna K, Movin T, et al. More histologic and ultrastructural degenerative signs in the subscapularis tendon and the joint capsule in male patients with shoulder impingement. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthosc. (2018) 26:79–87. doi: 10.1007/s00167-017-4442-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Junqueira LCU, Bignolas G, Brentani RR. Picrosirius staining plus polarization microscopy, a specific method for collagen detection in tissue sections. Histochem J. (1979) 11:447–55. doi: 10.1007/BF01002772

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Abd-Elkareem M. Cell-specific immuno-localization of progesterone receptor alpha in the rabbit ovary during pregnancy and after parturition. Anim Reprod Sci. (2017) 180:100–20. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2017.03.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Gross CA, Reddy CK, Dazzo FB. CMEIAS color segmentation: an improved computing technology to process color images for quantitative microbial Ecology studies at single-cell resolution. Microb Ecol. (2010) 59:400–14. doi: 10.1007/s00248-009-9616-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Lehane L, Rawlin GT. Topically acquired bacterial zoonoses from fish: a review. Med J Aust. (2000) 173:256–9. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2000.tb125632.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Boylan S. Zoonoses associated with fish. Vet Clin North Am Exot Anim Pract. (2011) 14:427–38. doi: 10.1016/j.cvex.2011.05.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Weir M, Rajic' A, Dutil L, Cernicchiaro N, Uhland FC, Mercier B, et al. Zoonotic bacteria, antimicrobial use and antimicrobial resistance in ornamental fish: a systematic review of the existing research and survey of aquaculture-allied professionals. Epidemiol Infect. (2012) 140:192–206. doi: 10.1017/S0950268811001798

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Gauthier DT. Bacterial zoonoses of fishes: a review and appraisal of evidence for linkages between fish and human infections. Vet J. (2015) 203:27–35. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.10.028

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Southwood LL, Baxter GM. Instrument sterilization, skin preparation, and wound management. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract. (1996) 12:173–94. doi: 10.1016/S0749-0739(17)30278-X

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Gomes BP, Ferraz CC, Vianna ME, Berber VB, Teixeira FB, Souza-Filho FJ. In vitro antimicrobial activity of several concentrations of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine gluconate in the elimination of Enterococcus faecalis. Int Endod J. (2001) 34:424–8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00410.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Weber DJ, Rutala WA, Sickbert-Nennett EE. Outbreaks associated with contaminated antiseptics and disinfectants. Antimicrob Agents and Chemother. (2007) 51:4217–24. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00138-07

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Bigliardi PL, Alsagoff SAL, El-Kafrawi HY, Pyon JK, Cheuk Wa CT, Villa MA. Povidone iodine in wound healing: a review of current concepts and practices. Int J Surg. (2017) 44:260–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.06.073

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Durani P, Leaper D. Povidone-iodine: use in hand disinfection, skin preparation and antiseptic irrigation. Int Wound J. (2008) 5:376–87. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2007.00405.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Edwards-Jones V. The benefits of silver in hygiene, personal care and healthcare. Lett Appl Microbiol. (2009) 49:147–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2009.02648.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Ip M, Liu SL, Poon VKM, Lung I, Burd A. Antimicrobial activities of silver dressings: an in vitro comparison. J Med Microbiol. (2006) 55:59–63. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.46124-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Pandian SRK, Deepak V, Kalishwaralal K, Viswanathan P, Gurunathan S. Mechanism of bactericidal activity of silver nitrate - a concentration dependent bi-functional molecule. Braz J Microbiol. (2010) 41:805–9. doi: 10.1590/S1517-83822010000300033

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Wilkinson LJ, White RJ, Chipman JK. Silver and nanoparticles of silver in wound dressings: a review of efficacy and safety. J Wound Care. (2011) 20:543–9. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2011.20.11.543

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Wijnhoven SWP, Peijnenburg WJGM, Herberts CA, Hagens WI, Oomen AG, Heugens EHW, et al. Nano-silver - a review of available data and knowledge gaps in human and environmental risk assessment. Nanotoxicology. (2009) 3:109–38. doi: 10.1080/17435390902725914

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar