Trends in the Epidemiology of Leishmaniasis in the City of Barcelona (1996–2019)

Introduction

Leishmaniasis is a zoonosis produced by 20 different flagellated parasites of the Leishmania genus, a protozoan transmitted to humans and other vertebrates by the bite of dipteran insects of Phlebotominae subfamily (1, 2). The parasites that cause leishmaniasis are present in 98 countries around the world, causing between 700,000 and 1 million new cases annually, with an estimated 350 million people at risk of infection worldwide (1–4). There are three main clinical forms visceral leishmaniasis (VL), cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL), and mucocutaneous leishmaniasis (ML) (1, 4). VL is the most serious form of leishmaniasis and causes a systemic disease characterized by irregular episodes of fever, spleen and liver enlargement, weight loss and anemia. CL is the most frequent presentation and causes skin lesions that evolve from nodules to painless ulcers, which can leave long lasting scars. ML is the most uncommon form of leishmaniasis, and leads to the destruction of nasooropharyngeal mucosa, usually after years of the initial skin lesions. Diagnosis is established through direct observation or molecular detection of Leishmania parasites in tissue specimens, mainly from skin lesions, for cutaneous leishmaniasis, or from bone marrow, for visceral leishmaniasis, although serological tests could also be used in different situations (2). The wide diversity of Leishmania species is associated with a difference in the clinical presentation, routes of transmission (zoonotic vs. anthroponotic) and treatment resistance (2, 5). In this sense, VL is usually caused by L. donovani or L. infantum, while CL can be caused by L. infanfum, L braziliensis, or L. tropica, between others (2).

In urban, periurban and domestic environments, dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) are usually considered main reservoirs of the parasite, although synanthropic rodents (e.g., Rattus norvegicus), wild rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus), hares (Lepus granatensis), and cats (Felis catus domesticus) can also play a relevant role as reservoir host (6–12).

In endemic developing countries, leishmaniasis mainly affects people of lower socioeconomic status, in rural areas with poor housing conditions, with little or no access to health services (1, 13). Within the risk groups, visceral leishmaniasis can present non-specific symptoms in children, and can be fatal without adequate treatment (14). Although coinfection with HIV is considered a public health problem in various parts of the world (15), the introduction of highly effective antiretroviral treatment in developed countries since 1997 has helped to decrease the HIV coinfection (16), so nowadays it is a pathology more common in immunosuppression non-HIV-related (17).

Incidence of Leishmaniasis in Mediterranean countries and across Europe has been described on the rise (1). Autochthonous cases have been recently described in non-endemic areas, like Southern Germany (18), and the number of imported cases has increased in areas such as Sweden or London (19, 20). In Sweden, an increase in diagnoses has been observed since 2013, especially in those under 18 years of age and migrants, mainly from Syria and Afghanistan (19). In London, most diagnoses occurred in tourists returning from the Mediterranean region and soldiers returning from other territories where the pathogen is endemic (20).

Climate change is expected to extend the geographical distribution and seasonality of phlebotomine vectors (7, 21). In Morocco, the increase in minimum temperatures has increased the survival of the sandfly larvae through the winters, extending their activity season. This combined with the increase in human circulation and tourism is thought to be one of the main causes for dissemination of cutaneous leishmaniasis (22). Spain has also experienced an increase in cases, though this phenomenon has been attributed to multiple factors, including improvements in notification, the seasonality of sandflies (16) and a growing urbanization that favors the contact between reservoirs and humans (23).

Studies in different areas of Spain have reported seroprevalence varying from 4 to 35% in dogs, with a high proportion of them not showing any clinical signs of leishmaniasis (24, 25). Phlebotomus perniciosus and Phlebotomus ariasi are the main vectors of Leishmania infantum in the Iberian Peninsula (23, 26). Moreover, in Spain, leishmaniasis is a hypoendemic, mandatory notifiable disease since 1995 (27), but reporting is compulsory for every Autonomous Region (CCAA) through the National Surveillance Network since 2015 (28). During the 2005–2017 period, Spain had an incidence rate of 0.62 cases per 100,000 inhabitants (16, 25), with a heterogeneous distribution, mainly affecting the Mediterranean region (the Valencian Community, Catalonia, the Balearic Islands and Andalusia), except for the Community of Madrid, where a large community outbreak was identified in 2009 and 2010 linked to a newly identified reservoir (26). The objective of this study is to characterize the epidemiology and temporal trends in the incidence of human leishmaniasis in the city of Barcelona, between the years 1996 and 2019.

Methodology

Study Design and Population

A population-based, analytical observational study was conducted with all reported leishmaniasis cases between 1996 and 2019. Data were drawn from the registry of notifiable diseases of the Epidemiology Service of the Public Health Agency of Barcelona (ASPB). The registry includes cases individually notified to the Epidemiology Service by healthcare professionals and, since 2016, it also includes laboratory notifications to the Catalan Microbiologic Notification System (SNMC) (29).

Variables

The registry of notifiable diseases contains the information included in the epidemiological surveys of cases carried out by public health nurses from the Epidemiology Service.

The epidemiological survey contains clinical, diagnostic, and epidemiological data, among others (Annex 1). The variables of interest included: age, sex, country of birth, date of onset of symptoms (onset, diagnosis, and notification data), type of leishmaniasis, history of immunosuppressive disease or immunosuppressive treatment, as well as history of contact with an infected dog or another animal suspected of infection and travel to an endemic country according to WHO's current guidelines at the time of the survey (30).

Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

All cases of leishmaniasis from patients who resided in the city of Barcelona and who met the case definition according to local guidelines were included (Annex 2). Cases were excluded if the patients resided in another city than Barcelona.

Analysis

Annual incidence-rates and its confidence interval (95%) were calculated by sex, age, and country of birth, in relation to the municipal registry of the city of Barcelona (31). The microbiological confirmation and national surveillance system were modified in 2016 (28). Consequently, to test for temporal changes in the influence of these variables on the incidence of leishmaniasis, the study period was divided into three periods: 1996–2005 (n = 55), 2006–2015 (n = 52), and 2016–2019 (n = 70).

The risk factors obtained from the survey were analyzed by the three proposed periods and the clinical presentation of the leishmaniasis. Cases were classified according to the Available Family Income Index of the municipal district of residence (IRFD for “Index renda familiar disponible”), into disadvantaged (IRFD < 1) or favored (IRFD > 1) neighborhood (32). In 2019, 62.2% of Barcelona's population lived in disadvantaged neighborhoods (31). A chi-squared or a Fisher's exact test were performed, as appropriate, and a p < 0.05 was considered significant. All the analyses were done using the program STATA version 15.

Results

Between 1996 and 2019, 177 cases of leishmaniasis were reported in Barcelona (Table 1). The median age was 34 years [interquartile range (IQR): 10–48]. 66.8% (n = 121) of the diagnoses occurred in men. According to origin, most cases occurred in native population (Table 1), however, a sustained increase in cases from foreign-born population were observed since 2003 (Figure 1). The main type of leishmaniasis was cutaneous (45.2%, n = 80), followed by visceral (34.5%, n = 61), and only 2.3% (n = 4) was mucocutaneous. 61.6% (n = 109) of the cases occurred in people who lived in disadvantaged municipal districts. 68.4% (n = 121) of the cases progressed to healing without sequel, 6.21% (n = 11) progressed with sequel, and 1.63% (n = 3) died (Table 1). The diagnosis were made by biopsy in 61% of the cases (n = 108), by a serological test in 21.5% (n = 38) and by culture in 19.4% (n = 21).

TABLE 1

Table 1. Descriptive statistics of the leishmaniasis cases reported in Barcelona between 1996 and 2019 (n = 177).

FIGURE 1

Figure 1. Total number of cases of leishmaniasis, in Spanish born population (native) and foreigner country of birth, in Barcelona between 1996 and 2019 (n = 177 cases).

The cumulative incidence during the study period was 0.47 per 100,000 inhabitants (Table 2), with the highest incidence found in 2017 (1.6 per 100,000 inhabitants) and the lowest in 2012 (Figure 2). Incidence was generally higher in men than women (0.68 vs. 0.27 per 100,000 inhabitants) and in foreign-born over Spanish-born population (0.74 vs. 0.41 per 100,000 inhabitants). Slight changes in incidence were observed between the first and second period (0.36–0.32 per 100,000), increasing significantly to 1.08 per 100,000 after 2016. An increase of the incidence was observed in all age groups, especially in the third period, with the higher incidence found in the 0–4-year-old group (1.73 per 100,000 inhabitants) (Table 2).

TABLE 2

Table 2. Incidence of leishmaniasis per 100,000 inhabitants and confidence interval (95%), by complete study time and periods 1996–2005 (n = 55), 2006–2015 (n = 52), and 2016–2019 (n = 70), Barcelona.

FIGURE 2

Figure 2. Annual incidence of leishmaniasis per 100,000 inhabitants, by complete sample and sexes. Barcelona, 1996–2019. (n = 177 cases).

During the three studied periods there was an increase of the cutaneous leishmaniasis in the second and third period (0–51.9 to 75.7%, p < 0.001), and a decrease of the visceral leishmaniasis in the final period (54.6 to 46.2% to a 10%, p < 0.001) (Table 3). Male sex accounted for over 80% of the cases in ages 25–64, without greater differences during the studied periods. Over 60% of cases occurred in disadvantaged neighborhoods during the three periods (p = 0.261). Leishmaniasis in foreign subjects increased over time, but only accounted for a third of the total cases in the last period. A significant decrease in cases related to any immunosuppression (due to disease or treatment) was observed (p < 0.001).

TABLE 3

Table 3. Cases of leishmaniasis according to type of disease and risk factors, during the three studied periods.

All types of leishmaniasis occurred mainly in Spanish born, men, and people from disadvantaged neighborhoods (Table 4). Visceral leishmaniasis was present in 40.9% of the cases that referred contact with an animal and 26% of the cases that referred intravenous drug use. A 33.8% of the cases who referred travel to an endemic country presented a cutaneous type of leishmaniasis (endemic country according to WHO's current guidelines at the time of the survey). Most of the visceral leishmaniasis required a hospital admission and it was the only leishmaniasis type related to a fatal outcome.

TABLE 4

Table 4. Type of Leishmaniasis according to risk factors and evolution.

Even if the current epidemiological survey does not systematically collect information on type of comorbidities, homelessness status, species of Leishmania or the type of animals that could have acted as a reservoir, it was possible to extract some of this information from the comments included by interviewers. Regarding comorbidities, it was observed that an 18.4% (n = 35) of the studied population had a diagnosis of HIV and two cases were described as Hepatitis C positive. Four cases were informed to be homeless. Seven cases were characterized as Leishmania donovani, and one case was described as Leishmania braziliensis.

Discussion

The results of this study have shown an increase in the incidence of leishmaniasis in the city of Barcelona from 1996 to 2019. This increase only appears as statistically significant for the period 2016-2019. The establishment of the Catalan Microbiologic Notification System as a consequence of the decree 203/2015 (29), which requires mandatory notification of all identified cases by laboratories, is likely to have contributed greatly to the observed trend, together with other factors such as the improvement in diagnostic tools and possibly a real change in disease burden. The increase is observed in all ages, being greater in the younger population and male adults. The number of foreign-born cases has increased since 2003 while the number of cases associated to immunosuppression has decreased. There is also a change in the type of leishmaniasis in the three studied periods, with an increase of cutaneous leishmaniasis.

The cumulative incidence during these 24 years of observation was higher than previously reported in analysis of the same database (0.33 per 100,000 inhabitants between 1997 and 2014) (33) but lower than the reported incidence of Spain (16, 25). After the modification of the confirmation and surveillance system (28, 29), there was a significant increase of the total incidence probably due to an improved reporting, and because a possible increase in the clinical suspicion at primary care level.

Our study has shown that men between 25 and 64 years old present a higher incidence of leishmaniasis in all the studied periods. Previous studies have associated this correlation with the incidence of HIV in this group (33). However, the reasons why men of working age have a higher incidence of leishmaniasis are diverse, and cannot be exclusively related to this comorbidity, even when the data obtained through the epidemiological survey does not allow us to test for further causality. In this population, men accounted for 91.9% of the cases related to alcoholism, 81.3% of cases with a history of intravenous drug use and 70% of traveling to endemic countries. Studies have described a male bias in certain infectious diseases (34), including leishmaniasis (35), proposing physiological and behavioral theories. However, the evidence is not conclusive, and we cannot exclude that man are more exposed to infected vectors because of their social or working activities.

By age groups, there was a consistent high incidence in cases under 5 years of age, but also a rise in the cases over 65 years since 2001. In the younger population, the main causes are associated to a lack of effective immune response (14, 33). In our sample, an 88.9% of the age group 0-4 was from native origin, a 66.7% presented a visceral type of leishmaniasis, and 85.19% evolved to healing without sequel. Is important to notice that there was no differences between native or foreign-born population in this age group during the three studied periods (Fisher's p = 0.142). Moreover, cases in the 0-4 age group during the third studied period (2016–2019), only occurred in Spanish-born population. In the elderly group, there was a rise in the diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis, being 64% of the total cases over 65 years of age. This group only presented a 20% history of immunosuppression and a 24% foreign origin. A 76% of the cases evolved to healing without sequel. The reasons for this increase are unclear and may be related to a change in the diagnosis system and access to dermatological services from primary care, but further investigation is required.

Among population from foreign country of birth, there is a persistent increase of incidence since 2003, consistent with a rise in foreign population migrating to Barcelona (3.8% of the total population in 1996 to 25.7% in 2019) (31), but also to international traveling to endemic areas, due to tourism, visiting relatives and work (22, 36). The difference between autochtonous and imported cases is difficult to establish due to the long incubation period of leishmaniasis (2 weeks to several years), and inconsistencies in the reporting of identified Leishmania species. Thus, our data might be overestimating the burden of locally acquired Leishmania. The introduction risk supposed by Leishmania braziliensis imported cases is thought to be limited due to the reported absence of competent vectors in Europe (7), although a possible competence of P. perniciosus to L. tropica should be accounted (37–39). Improvements in the registry should allow for the systematic report of the species of Leishmania involved in the clinical cases.

In relation to vulnerable populations, there was a decrease in cases related to immunosuppression, due to disease or treatment. This decrease could correspond to the improve of the antiretroviral treatments for HIV population (16), as well as improvements in the care of immunosuppressed patients, like transplanted, who presents a very low incidence of cases. In this study, most of the cases occurred in disadvantaged districts of Barcelona, without changes in time. Homeless cases are at a higher risk to get lost to follow up, facing a challenge to the prevention and surveillance strategy for years to come. Even when we did not have access to information of the individual's socio-economic status, the use of the Available Family Income Index is a good proxy to evaluate inequalities within the city (32).

Leishmaniasis is the most relevant endemic zoonosis in the last years in the Mediterranean basin, due to the coexistence of Leishmania protozoa; reservoirs such as hare (11, 40), rabbits (10), rodents and dogs (9, 41), and competent vectors (sandflies from the genus Phlebotomus). As a Mediterranean city, Barcelona has the appropriate climatic characteristics for local transmission of Leishmania sp. The presence of the two main vectors, Phlebotomus perniciosus and Phlebotomus ariasi, are known due to the monitoring of the city of Barcelona by the ASPB, the institution responsible for the vector surveillance and control in the city (42). Furthermore, recent research indicates that Norway rat, a synanthropic murid that shows high abundance and deeply distribution in the sewer system of the city (6), could play a relevant role as host reservoir of Leishmaniasis (43). At this point, it is important to emphasize the sewers have been also recorded as suitable breeding site for sandflies in Barcelona (unpublished data).

Climate change is affecting the geographical distribution and seasonality of many species, including sandflies, and increased connectivity has facilitated the expansion of different insect vectors into new geographical areas (7, 21). A climate change induced expansion of vector competent species will at the same time lead to an expansion of the risk area for leishmaniasis. The expansion of the green areas across the city due to the Climate change action plan (44) should consider the potential risk of increase in competent vector distribution and reservoirs. Overall, there is a need to enforce the surveillance system of leishmaniasis. Therefore, we recommend undertaking surveys in the city to characterize the distribution and abundance of different vectors, as a strategy to establish an effective surveillance and control program to reduce the risk of transmission.

Our results show that that autochthonous transmission is occurring in the city of Barcelona and consequently a more in-depth study of the vectors present in the city should be carried out, in order to know their distribution, abundance, and blood feeding behavior and thus have a diagnosis of the risk of transmission and spillover into humans. Epidemiological, vectorial and health surveillance must have in consideration the high risk groups, like homeless and exposed workers, as those who work in sewer systems, together with vector control programs associated to renovation works affecting the underground structure that may facilitate the movement of Phlebotomus into inhabited areas (3).

The main limitations of this study are the loss of follow up of some cases, and the lack of information regarding significant variables. There is a regular loss of cases each year, which may be due to cases that occurred in the homeless, or people that were in transit and the clinical history is incomplete. There is a clear need to review the current epidemiological survey to systematically collect information on the detected leishmania species, the type of treatment used and its efficacy, as well as homelessness status, to better characterize the impact of leishmaniasis on vulnerable populations. Identifying the domestic animals that act as reservoirs and ensuring they receive the necessary treatments to reduce the risk of new transmissions to humans should also be a priority to reduce the risk of local outbreaks (45, 46). It is also important to quantify the role that non-domestic animal species may play as reservoirs associated to human infection cases in the city (5, 47). Collaboration at an epidemiological and entomological level is one of the pillars to reduce the risks of transmission, thus trying to work on a One Health concept that integrates the different fields involved in the transmission processes.

Even though leishmaniasis is an endemic disease in Spain, the city of Barcelona will continue to be a highly transited city, with a higher migration rate and tourism, which may favor the occurrence of imported cases. This constitutes an entomological, clinical, and epidemiological challenge, due to the variety of clinical presentations and adaptation to vectors or local reservoirs.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics Statement

Ethical review and approval was not required for the study on human participants in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent from the participants' legal guardian/next of kin was not required to participate in this study in accordance with the national legislation and the institutional requirements.

Author Contributions

TM, J-PM, and CR worked in the conception and first design of the work. LM, PS, and EM were in charge of the acquisition of the data, and organization of the database. DP performed the statistical analysis and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. DP, LM, and JF worked in the interpretation of data for the work. DP and LM were in charge of drafting the work. RB-M, JF, PS, EM, CR, and TM critically revised the manuscript. All authors provide their final approval of the version to be published and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

To the nursing team of the ASPB, for their work in the follow-up of cases that has allowed us to carry out this study.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2021.653999/full#supplementary-material

References

1. Inceboz T. Epidemiology and ecology of leishmaniasis. In: Rodriguez-Morales AJ, editor. Current Topics in Neglected Tropical Diseases. IntechOpen (2019). 487 p. doi: 10.5772/intechopen.86359

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Burza S, Croft SL, Boelaert M. Leishmaniasis. Lancet. (2018) 392:951–70. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31204-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. de Vries HJ, Reedijk SH, Schallig HD. Cutaneous leishmaniasis: recent developments in diagnosis and management. Am J Clin Dermatol. (2015) 16:99–109. doi: 10.1007/s40257-015-0114-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. World Health Organization. Leishmaniasis Key Facts. (2020). Available online at https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/leishmaniasis (accesed December 23, 2020).

Google Scholar

5. World Health Organization. Control de las leishmaniasis. Serie de Informes Técnicos. Tech Rep Ser 949:1–186 (2010). 200 p. Available online at: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/82766/WHO_TRS_949_spa.pdf;jsessionid=5D05F70187908572FB89D8C1F49ABEF7?sequence=1 (accesed December 23, 2020).

Google Scholar

6. Galán-Puchades MT, Gómez-Samblás M, Suárez-Morán JM, Osuna A, Sanxis-Furió J, Pascual J, et al. Leishmaniasis in Norway Rats in Sewers, Barcelona, Spain. Emerg Infect Dis. (2019) 25:1222–4. doi: 10.3201/eid2506.181027

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Ready PD. Leishmaniasis emergence in Europe. Euro Surveill. (2010) 15:19505. doi: 10.2807/ese.15.10.19505-en

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Velez R, Ballart C, Domenech E, Abras A, Fernández-Arévalo A, Gómez SA, et al. Seroprevalence of canine Leishmania infantum infection in the Mediterranean region and identification of risk factors: the example of North-Eastern and Pyrenean areas of Spain. Prev Vet Med. (2019) 162:67–75. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2018.10.015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Abbate JM, Arfuso F, Napoli E, Gaglio G, Giannetto S, Latrofa MS, et al. Leishmania infantum in wild animals in endemic areas of southern Italy. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. (2019) 67:101374. doi: 10.1016/j.cimid.2019.101374

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Jiménez M, González E, Martín-Martín I, Hernández S, Molina R. Could wild rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) be reservoirs for Leishmania infantum in the focus of Madrid, Spain? Vet Parasitol. (2014) 202:296–300. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.03.027

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Molina R, Jiménez MI, Cruz I, Iriso A, Martín-Martín I, Sevillano O, et al. The hare (Lepus granatensis) as potential sylvatic reservoir of Leishmania infantum in Spain. Vet Parasitol. (2012) 190:268–71. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.05.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Martín-Sánchez J, Acedo C, Muñoz-Pérez M, Pesson B, Marchal O, Morillas-Márquez F. Infection by Leishmania infantum in cats: epidemiological study in Spain. Vet Parasitol. (2007) 145:267–73. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.11.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Okwor I, Uzonna J. Social and economic burden of human leishmaniasis. Am J Trop Med Hyg. (2016) 94:489–93. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.15-0408

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Ramos JM, Clavijo A, Moral L, Gavilan C, Salvador T, González de Dios J. Epidemiological and clinical features of visceral leishmaniasis in children in Alicante Province, Spain. Paediatr Int Child Health. (2018) 38:203–8. doi: 10.1080/20469047.2018.1468585

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Graepp-Fontoura I, Soeiro Barbosa D, Paes A, Santos FS, Santos Neto M, Fontoura VM, et al. Epidemiological, clinical and laboratory aspects of human visceral leishmaniasis (HVL) associated with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) coinfection: a systematic review. Parasitology. (2018) 145:1801–18. doi: 10.1017/S003118201800080X

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Fernández Martínez B, Gómez Barroso D, Cano Portero R. La leishmaniasis en España: evolución de los casos notificados a la Red Nacional de Vigilancia Epidemiológica desde 2005 a 2017 y resultados de la vigilancia de 2014 a 2017. Bol Epidemiol Sem. (2019) 27:15–27.

Google Scholar

17. Horrillo L, Castro A, Matía B, Molina L, García-Martínez J, Jaqueti J, et al. Clinical aspects of visceral leishmaniasis caused by L. infantum in adults. Ten years of experience of the largest outbreak in Europe: what have we learned? Parasit Vectors. (2019) 12:359. doi: 10.1186/s13071-019-3628-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Haeberlein S, Fischer D, Thomas SM, Schleicher U, Beierkuhnlein C, Bogdan C. First assessment for the presence of phlebotomine vectors in Bavaria, Southern Germany, by combined distribution modeling and field surveys. PLoS One. (2013) 8:e81088. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081088

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Söbirk SK, Inghammar M, Collin M, Davidsson L. Imported leishmaniasis in Sweden 1993-2016. Epidemiol Infect. (2018) 146:1267–74. doi: 10.1017/S0950268818001309

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Wall EC, Watson J, Armstrong M, Chiodini PL, Lockwood DN. Epidemiology of imported cutaneous leishmaniasis at the Hospital for Tropical Diseases, London, United Kingdom: use of polymerase chain reaction to identify the species. Am J Trop Med Hyg. (2012) 86:115–8. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2012.10-0558

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Chalghaf B, Chemkhi J, Mayala B, Harrabi M, Benie GB, Michael E, et al. Ecological niche modeling predicting the potential distribution of Leishmania vectors in the Mediterranean basin: impact of climate change. Parasit Vectors. (2018) 11:461. doi: 10.1186/s13071-018-3019-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Kholoud K, Bounoua L, Sereno D, El Hidan M, Messouli M. Emerging and re-emerging leishmaniases in the mediterranean area: what can be learned from a retrospective review analysis of the situation in Morocco during 1990 to 2010? Microorganisms. (2020) 8:1511. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8101511

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Arce A, Estirado A, Ordobas M, Sevilla S, García N, Moratilla L, et al. Re-emergence of Leishmaniasis in Spain: community outbreak in Madrid, Spain, 2009 to 2012. Euro Surveill. (2013) 18:20546. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES2013.18.30.20546

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. World Health Organization. Leishmaniasis Country Profiles. Spain (2020). Available online at: https://www.who.int/leishmaniasis/burden/Leishmaniasis_Spain/en/ (accessed November 23, 2020).

Google Scholar

25. Gálvez R, Montoya A, Cruz I, Fernández C, Martín O, Checa R, et al. Latest trends in Leishmania infantum infection in dogs in Spain, Part I: mapped seroprevalence and sand fly distributions. Parasit Vectors. (2020) 13:204. doi: 10.1186/s13071-020-04081-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. González E, Molina R, Jiménez M. Rabbit trypanosome detection in Phlebotomus perniciosus sand flies from the leishmaniasis outbreak in Madrid, Spain. Acta Trop. (2018) 187:201–6. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2018.08.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Real Decreto 2210/1995, de 28 de diciembre, por el que se crea la red nacional de vigilancia epidemiológica. Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo.

Google Scholar

28. Orden SSI/445/2015, de 9 de marzo por la que se modifican los anexos I, II y III del Real Decreto 2210/1995, de 28 de diciembre, por el que se crea la red nacional de vigilancia epidemiológica, relativos a la lista de enfermedades de declaración obligatoria modalidades de declaración y enfermedades endémicas de ámbito regional. Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo.

Google Scholar

29. Generalitat de Catalunya. Decret 203/2015, de 15 de setembre, pel qual es crea la Xarxa de Vigilància Epidemiològica i es regulen els sistemes de notificació de malalties de declaració obligatòria i brots epidèmics.

Google Scholar

30. World Health Organization. Status of Endemicity of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis. (2019). Available online at: https://apps.who.int/neglected_diseases/ntddata/leishmaniasis/leishmaniasis.html (accessed March 24, 2021).

Google Scholar

31. Ajuntament de Barcelona. Xifres Oficials de la Población. Departament de Estadísticas y Difusió de dades (2020). Available online at: http://www.bcn.cat/estadistica/catala/dades/tpob/pad/ine/index.htm (accessed November 30, 2020).

Google Scholar

32. Ajuntament de Barcelona. Distribució Territorial de la Renda Familiar. Departament de Estadísticas y Difusió de dades (2020). Available online at: https://www.bcn.cat/estadistica/catala/dades/economia/renda/rdfamiliar/index.htm (accessed November 30, 2020).

Google Scholar

33. Riera C, Napp S, Manzanares S. Epidemiología de la leishmaniasis humana en la ciudad de Barcelona (1997-2014). Rev Enf Emerg. (2016) 15:68–76.

Google Scholar

34. Guerra-Silveira F, Abad-Franch F. Sex Bias in infectious disease epidemiology: patterns and processes. PLoS One. (2013) 8:e62390. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062390

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Cloots K, Burza S, Malaviya P, Hasker E, Kansal S, Mollett G, et al. Male predominance in reported Visceral Leishmaniasis cases: Nature or nurture? A comparison of population-based with health facility-reported data. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. (2020) 14:e0007995. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007995

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Orduna T, Lloveras S, Gonzalez GD, Falcone CC, Garro SL, Echazarreta SE. Abstract 32.025: new world cutaneous Leishmaniasis in travelers (1994-2008) experience in Argentina. In: International Congress on Infectious Diseases (ICID) Abstracts. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2010.02.1797

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Di Muccio T, Scalone A, Bruno A, Marangi M, Grande R, Armignacco O, et al. Epidemiology of imported leishmaniasis in Italy: implications for a European endemic country. PLoS One. (2015) 10:e0129418. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129418

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Bongiorno G, Di Muccio T, Bianchi R, Gramiccia M, Gradoni L. Laboratory transmission of an Asian strain of Leishmania tropica by the bite of the southern European sand fly Phlebotomus perniciosus. Int J Parasitol. (2019) 49:417–421. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2018.12.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Vaselek S, Volf P. Experimental infection of Phlebotomus perniciosus and Phlebotomus tobbi with different Leishmania tropica strains. Int J Parasitol. (2019) 49:831–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2019.05.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Jiménez M, González E, Iriso A, Marco E, Alegret A, Fúster F, et al. Detection of Leishmania infantum and identification of blood meals in Phlebotomus perniciosus. from a focus of human leishmaniasis in Madrid, Spain. Parasitol Res. (2013) 112:2453–9. doi: 10.1007/s00436-013-3406-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Montoya-Alonso JA, Morchón R, Costa-Rodríguez N, Matos JI, Falcón-Cordón Y, Carretón E. Current distribution of selected Vector-Borne Diseases in dogs in Spain. Front Vet Sci. (2020) 7:564429. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.564429

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Agència de Salut Pública de Barcelona. Memoria d'activitat del Servei de Vigilància i Control de Plagues Urbanes. (2018). Available online at: https://www.aspb.cat/arees/plagues-urbanes/vigilancia-i-control-de-plagues-ambientals/

Google Scholar

43. Pascual J, Franco S, Bueno-Marí R, Peracho V, Montalvo T. Demography and ecology of Norway rats, Rattus norvegicus, in the sewer system of Barcelona (Catalonia, Spain). J Pest Sci. (2020) 93:711–22. doi: 10.1007/s10340-019-01178-6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Ajuntament de Barcelona. Plan Clima 2018-2013. (2020). Available online at: https://ajuntament.barcelona.cat/ecologiaurbana/ca/que-fem-i-per-que/energia-i-canvi-climatic/pla-clima (accessed December 23, 2020).

Google Scholar

45. Postigo JA. Leishmaniasis in the World Health Organization Eastern Mediterranean Region. Int J Antimicrob Agents. (2010) 36(Suppl 1):S62–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2010.06.023

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. World Health Organization. Manual on Case Management and Surveillance of the Leishmaniasis in the WHO European Region. (2017). Available online at: https://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/341970/MANUAL-ON-CASE-MANAGEMENT_FINAL_with-cover-and-ISBN.pdf (accessed March 24, 2021).

Google Scholar

47. Alemayehu B, Alemayehu M. Leishmaniasis: a review on parasite, vector and reservoir host. Health Sci J. (2017) 4:519. doi: 10.21767/1791-809X.1000519

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar