In the published article, there was an error in Figures 2, 3 as published. The y-axes values for these figures had been calculated incorrectly. The corrected Figures 2, 3 and their captions appear below.
Figure 2
Predicted proportions of lying animals that had outstretched legs at different k-values across days. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals of predicted proportions. Predicted proportions were calculated as predicted numbers divided by the average number of sheep lying at each time point (12.48).
Figure 3
Predicted proportions of animals lying with their head down that place their head on a conspecific at different k-values across days. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals of predicted proportions. Predicted proportions were calculates as predicted numbers divided by the average number of sheep lying at each time point (6.69).
In the published article, there was an error in the Conflict of interest statement. The original statement was:
“Author JM was employed by Jemora Pty Ltd. The study received funding from Meat and Livestock Australia Pty Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.”
The corrected statement is:
“Author JM was employed by Jemora Pty Ltd. The study received funding from Meat and Livestock Australia Pty Ltd. The funder was not involved in the study design, collection, analysis, interpretation of data, the writing of this article or the decision to submit it for publication. All authors declare no other competing interests.”
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Summary
Keywords
live export, faecal glucocorticoid metabolites, lying positions, allometry, ruminant welfare
Citation
Mayes BT, Tait LA, Cowley FC, Morton JM, Doyle BP, Arslan MA and Taylor PS (2022) Corrigendum: Stocking density, restricted trough space, and implications for sheep behaviour and biological functioning. Front. Vet. Sci. 9:1077412. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.1077412
Received
22 October 2022
Accepted
11 November 2022
Published
22 November 2022
Volume
9 - 2022
Edited and reviewed by
Edward Narayan, The University of Queensland, Australia
Updates
Copyright
© 2022 Mayes, Tait, Cowley, Morton, Doyle, Arslan and Taylor.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Bonnie T. Mayes bmayes@myune.edu.au
This article was submitted to Animal Behavior and Welfare, a section of the journal Frontiers in Veterinary Science
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.