Skip to main content

REVIEW article

Front. Vet. Sci., 26 May 2022
Sec. Animal Reproduction - Theriogenology
Volume 9 - 2022 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.881232

A Review on Canine and Feline Prostate Pathology

Chiara Palmieri1* Carlos Eduardo Fonseca-Alves2 Renee Laufer-Amorim2
  • 1School of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD, Australia
  • 2School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Sao-Paulo State University-UNESP, Botucatu, Brazil

Prostatic diseases are very common in male dogs, accounting for 3–10% of cases submitted to the veterinary practitioners. Commonly reported canine prostatic disorders include prostatic hyperplasia, prostatitis, prostatic cysts and prostatic carcinoma. However, clinical signs may be non-specific, or many cases are asymptomatic, thus leading to a difficult estimation of the actual prevalence of clinical cases. On the other side, because of the rare occurrence of prostate disease in cats, very little is known about pathogenesis, diagnostic approaches and treatment. The goal of this review is to provide detailed clinical and pathological overview of the feline and canine prostatic pathology, including the most up-to-date classification systems and histological findings. Emphasis is places on gross, cytological and histological features that are critical to reach a definitive diagnosis for a proper treatment and prognosis.

Introduction

Diseases of the prostate are common in older male dogs, while occasionally reported in cats. The main challenge from a clinical perspective is the overlap of clinical signs referring to dysfunctions of the urinary and/or intestinal tract that may be observed in the majority of the disease processes. Moreover, some cases may be asymptomatic and go unnoticed or different lesions can be present simultaneously. It has been estimated that 75.6% of dogs that die of disease unrelated to the prostate have however prostatic disorders at post-mortem examination (1).

This means that estimating the prevalence of these disorders is quite difficult. This is particularly obvious when examining prostatic lesions in cats, while in dogs it is well known that some disorders (e.g., prostatic hyperplasia) accounts for the majority of cases of prostatic diseases, followed by prostatitis, tumors and squamous metaplasia, although a combination of different disease processes is very common (e.g., prostatitis concurrent with prostatic hyperplasia).

This article provides a comprehensive overview of prostatic lesions in dogs and cats, covering common diseases affecting this accessory gland of the male reproductive tract, as well as updates and terminologies that have been proposed in the last decade. However, it should be taken into consideration that the information reported by the previous and current literature may not be a real representation of the prevalence of different prostatic disorders due to the paucity of available data, the different frequency of castration in the country of origin of the studies that may influence the incidence of hormone-induced prostatic atrophy and the perception of a higher incidence of prostatic tumors in castrated dogs and sensitivity of the diagnostic procedures of choice.

Prostate Anatomy and Histology

The prostate is the only accessory sex gland of the canine male reproductive tract, while cats possess both prostate and bulbourethral gland. The canine prostate is an ovoid-shaped, bilobed organ that completely envelopes the proximal portion of the urethra close to the neck of the bladder (2). The feline prostate is more caudally placed than in dogs, located 2–3 cm from the urinary bladder, behind the cranial border of the pelvic symphysis under the ventral wall of the rectum (3). It covers the urethra only dorsally and laterally (4). The canine prostate is enveloped by a fibromuscular capsule that receives smooth muscle fibers from the wall of the urinary bladder. The gland has a dorso-medial sulcus and a median septum that divides the prostate into right and left lobe. Each lobe is further separated into lobules by capsular trabeculae. The vas deferens enters the cranio-dorsal surface of each prostate lobe, ending up in the urethra by the colliculus seminalis (2).

There is a marked development of the canine prostate after birth between 24 and 32 weeks of age reflecting the increase in number of Leydig cells in the testis after 28 weeks of age and increased plasma testosterone levels (5, 6). The prostate from sexually immature dogs consists of a branching ductular system radiating from the prostatic urethra admixed with not well-developed acini scattered in the external portion of the gland. These small glandular structures lack any lumen until 8 weeks of age. Most of the prostatic tissue is occupied by connective tissue stroma (7). Between 24 and 32 weeks of age, there is a progressive increase in number and size of the glandular alveoli, increased height of the glandular epithelium, formation of small epithelial projections within the lumen and intraluminal accumulation of proteinaceous material that marks the beginning of the secretory function of the prostatic epithelium (7) (Figures 1A,B). Sexual maturity in dogs varies according to the breed and even according to the bodyweight within the same breed (6, 8). Therefore, it is recommended to examine the testes together with the prostate to determine the age of sexual maturity. This may be extremely important for toxicologic studies since immature acini could lead to a misdiagnosis of treatment-related effect of glandular atrophy, while it may just be expression of the stage of sexual maturity.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Normal prostate gland from a sexually immature dog. Tissue section. (A) Prostate at 12 weeks of age with radiating branching ducts from the prostatic urethra (not visible; on the right-hand side). Hematoxylin-eosin staining. Bar = 400 μm. (B) Prostate at 24 weeks of age: irregular glands with a small lumen and moderate amount of stroma. Hematoxylin-eosin staining. Bar = 200 μm.

About 63% of dogs develop progressive enlargement of the prostate with age after puberty (9). On the other side, following castration, the canine prostate undergoes an involution because of androgen deprivation with the serum testosterone concentration reaching very low baseline values already in the 1 week post-castration (10). A 70% reduction of the size of the organ is already obvious 7–14 days after castration and this is likely to occur also in cats (11, 12).

Material from the prostate for cytological evaluation may be obtained through the urethra (prostatic massage), ejaculation or direct fine needle aspirate (FNA) (13, 14) and the collection technique influences the morphology of the epithelial cells and the number of other cell types in the cytological samples. Normal prostatic epithelial cells obtained from aspiration from normal dogs usually occur in small to medium clusters, are uniform in shape and size, cuboidal to lowly columnar with small to moderate amount of occasionally vacuolated basophilic cytoplasm, round to oval central nuclei with a reticular chromatin pattern and small to inconspicuous nucleoli (Figure 2). Individual or small cluster of mostly round epithelial cells with the same nuclear and cytoplasmic features as described above are instead observed in cytological samples collected by prostatic massage. Other cell types that may be present are spermatozoa, squamous epithelial cells and urothelial cells (13, 14). The number of other cell types in cytologic samples depends on the collection technique: spermatozoa are most frequently found in ejaculated material, while squamous cells deriving from the distal urethra or the external genitalia and urothelial cells can be found in samples obtained by both prostatic massage and ejaculation (13, 14).

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Prostate aspirate showing normal prostatic epithelial cells in small cluster with centrally located nuclei, finely stippled or reticular chromatin pattern and finely granular cytoplasm. Prostate fine needle aspirate (FNA), smear. Wright-Giemsa stain. Bar = 12 μm.

Histologically, the glandular portion of the prostate consists of tubuloalveolar glands producing secretions that are conveyed to the prostatic urethra through small periurethral ducts. Small ducts are also present in the periphery of the prostate, but they cannot be easily discerned without specific staining. The normal epithelium of the prostate consists of two cell layers: a luminal or secretory cell layer and a basal cell layer (Figure 3A). A third cell type in the normal human prostatic epithelium is the neuroendocrine (NE) cell (15), whose existence in cats and dogs is controversial (16, 17). In two of the most recent studies on identification of NE cells in dogs and cats, rare serotonin-positive cells have been described in normal and hyperplastic canine prostates with their number increasing after castration (18) and serotonin—and chromogranin A-positive cells in the prostate of sexually mature healthy cats (19). Basal cells are scarce, round to oblong, but occasionally flattened, with scant amount of dense eosinophilic cytoplasm and a small hyperchromatic nucleus. Small nucleoli may be occasionally seen. The immunophenotype of basal cells is distinctive and can be of diagnostic utility. Antibodies directed against high molecular weight cytokeratin (HMWK), cytokeratin 5 (CK5), and p63 react with basal cells (Figure 3B) while the same cells are mostly PSA (Prostate Specific Antigen)-, AR (Androgen receptor)-, and CK8/18-negative (2022). Basal epithelial cells form a discontinuous layer in the canine prostate, while the lack of a continuous basal cell layer in humans is a strong indicator of prostatic carcinoma (23). The precise function of normal prostatic basal cells is unclear in dogs, although it is likely that the basal cell population harbors stem cells (24). The secretory or luminal cells make up the bulk of the epithelial volume. They are cuboidal to columnar with nuclei in the basal or midportion of the cell, an hyperosinophilic granular cytoplasm with occasional vacuolations, and small round nuclei with fine evenly dispersed chromatin. Nucleoli are not usually evident or are pinpoint in size. Secretory cells are PSA-, CK8/18-, and AR-positive (2022) (Figures 3C,D). The columnar cells of the prostatic acini gradually change to a single lining of cuboidal epithelial cells within the ducts.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Histological and immunohistochemical features of the normal canine prostate. (A) Tubuloalveolar gland lined by secretory columnar cells with low number of basal cells (arrows). Hematoxylin-eosin staining. Bar = 25 μm. (B) Nuclear expression of p63 by basal cells. IHC. DAB chromagen. Meyer's hematoxylin counterstain. Bar = 100 μm (mouse monoclonal anti-mouse p63, Dako, 1:150). (C) Cytoplasmic expression of CK8/18 by columnar secretory cells. IHC. DAB chromagen. Meyer's hematoxylin counterstain. Bar = 25 μm (mouse monoclonal anti-human Ck8/18, Novocastra, 1:600). (D) Nuclear positive staining for androgen receptor (AR) by columnar secretory cells. IHC. DAB chromagen. Meyer's hematoxylin counterstain. Bar = 25 μm (rabbit polyclonal anti-human AR, Santa Cruz Biotech., 1:1,000).

Canine Prostate Pathology

Although large-scale epidemiologic studies on the prevalence of prostatic disorders are lacking, prostatic hyperplasia and acute or chronic prostatitis are definitely the most common lesions observed in dogs with an incidence of 46–55.3% and 28–38.5% respectively. These are followed by prostatic cysts (2.6–14%) and prostatic neoplasia (0.2–0.35%) (2530).

Prostatic Hyperplasia

Prostatic hyperplasia (PH)—traditionally called benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)—is the most common prostatic disorder in intact dogs. Approximately 50% of dogs may have histologic changes of PH by 4–5 years of age and more than 90% by 8 years of age (31). Since the term hyperplasia is already defining a benign process, it is preferable to use PH instead of BPH, as recommended by the canine prostate cancer subgroup of the Oncology Pathology Working Group (OPWG), a joint initiative of the Veterinary Cancer Society and the American College of Veterinary Pathologists (32). The estrogen: testosterone ratio is increased in affected dogs. Estrogens enhance androgen receptors and acts synergistically with an overproduction of dihydrotestosterone (DHT) in potentiating the hyperplastic process (33). This explains why the administration of androgens in combination with estrogens to orchiectomized dogs induces prostatic hyperplasia (34).

Clinical signs are present only once the prostate is large enough and affected animals may be presented with urethral discharge, tenesmus, hematuria, fertility abnormalities and occasionally a stilted gait caused by prostatic pain (25, 26, 35). Cytologically, the hyperplastic epithelial cells are very similar to the normal prostatic epithelium, although the cellularity of the sample may be higher (13, 14) (Figure 4). Mild increase in cell size and anisokaryosis may be noted. Cells can exfoliate in large sheets in a honeycomb pattern (13, 14).

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Prostate aspirate showing a large cluster of uniform prostatic epithelial cells from a dog with prostatic hyperplasia. The cells have moderate amount of granular cytoplasm and round, central to eccentric nucleus with finely stippled to reticular chromatin. Note the pink granular material on the background, most likely indicating the secretory proteinaceous activity of the glandular epithelial cells. Prostate FNA, cytospin. Wright-Giemsa stain. Bar = 50 μm.

Grossly, PH-affected dogs have a uniformly enlarged prostate and frequently variable-sized cysts (Figure 5). PH is a spontaneous morphologic change associated with aging and sex hormone dysregulation and can be histologically classified into glandular and complex hyperplasia (31, 32, 36). A breed predisposition (Rhodesian ridgeback) has been reported by Beining et al. (37), although this finding should be further investigated and confirmed in a large-scale study. Glandular hyperplasia occurs in dogs as early as 2–3 years of age and consists of a uniform glandular enlargement of the prostatic alveoli, increased papillary infoldings and increased number of columnar secretory cells (7, 38) (Figure 6A). The hyperplastic epithelial cells have basal nuclei and prominent granules in the apical cytoplasm. It is important to emphasize that early hyperplastic changes are histologically indistinguishable from a normal prostate and the weight of the gland relative to the age, bodyweight and breed may help in most but not all cases. Complex hyperplasia occurs in dogs older than 6 years of age and is characterized by the presence of cystic lesions admixed with areas of glandular hyperplasia and atrophic glands, separated by an increased amount of stroma (collagen, smooth muscle) (36) (Figure 6B). Interestingly, DeKlerk et al. (38) induced canine PH in Beagle dogs by administering both 17β-estradiol and either 5α-androstane-3α, 17β-diol or dihydrotestosterone. Young dogs developed glandular hyperplasia, while cystic/complex hyperplasia was never observed in this age group (38). Therefore, aging represents an important contributing factor for the development of cystic hyperplasia. In some cases of PH, chronic inflammation with infiltration of mononuclear cells may be present (5, 38) (Figure 6B).

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. Transverse cross-section of a canine prostate with evidences of prostatic hyperplasia. Enlarged prostate with multifocal small cystic lesions. Bar = 0.35 cm.

FIGURE 6
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 6. Histological subtypes of prostatic hyperplasia in dogs: (A) Glandular hyperplasia: large alveoli with numerous intraluminal papillary projections admixed with a reduced amount of stroma. Hematoxylin-eosin staining. Bar = 100 μm. (B) Complex hyperplasia: multifocal lesion with dilated and cystic alveoli. Note the randomly scattered aggregates of inflammatory cells (arrows). Hematoxylin-eosin staining. Bar = 200 μm.

Prostatitis

Prostatitis is a common histologic finding in prostates of intact dogs. Reports in castrated dogs are exceptionally rare and usually associated with a history of recent castration before presentation. This inflammatory process may be subclinical or clinically relevant, especially in the acute stage with the infiltration of large number of neutrophils within the interstitium and in the lumen of the glandular acini (32, 39) (Figure 7A). These acute inflammatory forms are usually caused by Escherichia coli or Proteus vulgaris ascending from the urethra. Other common isolates are Staphylococcus spp., Streptococcus spp., Pseudomonas spp., Klebsiella spp., Enterobacter spp., Pasteurella, Haemophilus (11, 33, 40). Other inflammatory cells can also be identified in histological sections such as macrophages, lymphocytes, and plasma cells either in the prostatic acini or stroma (32, 39) (Figure 7B). According to the severity of the infection, additional histologic findings may be interstitial edema, hemorrhage and/or necrosis. Cytological samples from cases of bacterial prostatitis contains high number of neutrophils (Figure 7C), mostly with degenerative changes, exfoliated hyperplastic prostatic epithelial cells, intracellular and extracellular bacteria (in the absence of previous antibiotic therapy) and occasional macrophages and lymphocytes, especially if the infection is becoming chronic (13, 14). Acute prostatitis is usually associated with fever, anorexia, depression, straining to urinate or defecate, caudal abdominal pain, hematuria, pain on rectal palpation and sporadically edema of the scrotum, prepuce and hindlimb (41).

FIGURE 7
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 7. Histological (A,B,D) and cytological (C) features of three different types of prostatitis in dogs (A). Acute prostatitis with infiltration of high number of neutrophils (asterisks) and occasional reactive changes in the glandular epithelial cells (large nuclei, prominent nucleoli) (arrows). Hematoxylin-eosin staining. Bar = 60 μm. (B) Infiltration of high number of neutrophils and macrophages with severe destruction of the gland (pyogranulomatous prostatitis). Hematoxylin-eosin staining. Bar = 60 μm. (C) Prostate aspirate showing cytological features of acute prostatitis with high number of neutrophils with minimal nuclear degeneration and rare prostatic epithelial cells. Prostate FNA, cytospin. Wright-Giemsa stain. Bar = 30 μm. (D) Mild multifocal chronic lymphoplasmacytic prostatitis (arrows). Hematoxylin-eosin staining. Bar = 120 μm.

Prostatitis may be also observed with Brucella canis infection (chronic interstitial prostatitis) (42), dissemination of fungal organisms through a systemic infection (Blastomyces dermatitis, Cryptococcus neoformans, Coccidioides immitis) causing a granulomatous prostatitis (40, 43, 44) and rarely Mycoplasma canis and Leishmania spp. (45, 46). On the other hand, chronic prostatitis might occur in dogs without any clinical signs. When present, clinical signs of chronic prostatitis are non-specific, with affected dogs experiencing recurrent urinary tract infections, poor semen quality, infertility, decreased libido, intermittent urethral discharge (41). Histopathology reveals focal or multifocal infiltration of mononuclear cells in the prostatic stroma and variable degree of atrophy of the prostatic secretory cells and fibrosis (32) (Figure 7D).

Prostatic Abscess

Prostatic abscess is usually considered a sequela of chronic prostatitis (26) or can occur in association with acute bacterial prostatitis and cystic hyperplasia (40). Rarely, prostatic abscess may be secondary to bacteremia (26, 28). The diagnosis is usually made by history, clinical examination, ultrasonography of the prostate, laboratory findings and bacterial culture of the urine and/or prostatic fluid (40). Clinical signs may be variable depending on the size of the lesion and whether the infection becomes systemic. They include tenesmus and dysuria caused by the progressive enlargement of the prostate or urethral discharge or systemic symptoms caused by endotoxemia (33). Histologically, prostatic abscesses are characterized by a severe neutrophil infiltration, with gland destruction and necrosis.

Prostatic Cystic Conditions

Prostatic and paraprostatic cysts are grouped under the same paragraph as conditions characterized by the presence of cystic lesions, although they have different pathogenesis and distribution. Clinical signs are uncommon, unless the size of the cyst becomes large enough to cause dysuria, tenesmus and hematuria (33). Cytologically, they may be acellular or containing few normal epithelial cells, rare non-degenerative neutrophils, macrophages, small lymphocytes and/or erythrocytes and cellular debris (13, 14). Prostatic cysts are traditionally considered a further evolution of a cystic PH with grossly detectable cysts within the prostatic parenchyma and a classical “honeycomb” appearance (26) (Figure 5). Histologically, prostatic cysts are large acini with or without intraluminal proteinaceous material lined by atrophic glandular cells. Intraprostatic cysts may also occur in association to squamous metaplasia and prostatitis or when ducts are obstructed leading to accumulation of prostatic fluid, hence the definition of prostatic retention cysts. Some paraprostatic cysts arise from a cystic uterus masculinus, a remnant of the paramesonephric duct, and are commonly located in the craniolateral or dorsal aspect of the prostate (47). Grossly, they are large nodular structures, usually palpable through the pelvic cavity (they can reach up to 30 cm in diameter), enclosed within a fibrocollagenous capsule that might undergo ossification and mineralization (26, 48). Mineralization of paraprostatic cyst is reported to be uncommon (4951), although Renfrew et al. (52) have observed mineralized cysts in 3 out of 6 affected dogs, concluding that this process is actually more common than implied in the literature.

Prostatic Atrophy

Prostatic atrophy in dogs can be classified into atrophy secondary to neutering (hormonal atrophy) and atrophy associated with chronic inflammation (32). The hormonal atrophy has no clinical significance and may also be secondary to the administration of antiandrogenic drugs (32) and GnRH agonists and antagonists (53). Castration induces a progressive shrinkage of the prostatic acini with relative increase of the fibromuscular tissue until only low number of tubules with a single epithelial lining remains in the advanced stage (54) (Figure 8). On the other hand, prostatic atrophy can occur in intact or castrated dogs in association with a focal, multifocal or diffuse lymphoplasmacytic inflammatory infiltrate. At low magnification, these atrophic glands show a hyperchromatic appearance, surrounded by the inflammatory infiltrate. At higher magnifications, the atrophic acini containing at least two layers: (1) basal cell layer and (2) secretory atrophic layer (Figure 9A). Both cell populations have reduced cytoplasm and hyperchromatic nuclei. Although these cells are morphologically atrophic, they are also proliferative (“paradox” atrophy) and this specific lesion is defined as Proliferative Inflammatory Atrophy (PIA) in humans. PIA is considered a precursor of Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia (PIN) and prostate cancer (55). Although there are still no studies demonstrating a strict correlation between PIA and progression to cancer in dogs, PIA-like lesions have been described in dogs, both in normal and neoplastic prostates (29, 5658). The cell population of these lesions in dogs show an intermediate phenotype, expressing both luminal and basal cell markers (59) (Figures 9B,C).

FIGURE 8
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 8. Histology of the prostate from a castrated dog: hormonal atrophy with relative increase of the interstitial stroma and tubules lined by a single epithelial layer. Hematoxylin-eosin staining. Bar = 120 μm.

FIGURE 9
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 9. Histological and immunohistochemical features of glandular atrophy associated with chronic inflammation (PIA-like lesions). (A) Gland with attenuated epithelium and surrounding chronic inflammatory infiltrate (asterisk). Hematoxylin-eosin staining. Bar = 120 μm. (B) Cytoplasmic expression of CK8/18 by epithelial cells of the PIA-like lesions. IHC. DAB chromagen. Meyer's hematoxylin counterstain. Bar = 120 μm (mouse monoclonal anti-human Ck8/18, Novocastra, 1:600). (C) Cytoplasmic expression of CK5 by epithelial cells of the PIA-like lesions. IHC. DA chromagen. Meyer's hematoxylin counterstain. Bar = 120 μm (mouse monoclonal anti-human CK5, Novocastra, 1:300).

Squamous Metaplasia

When the prostate undergoes squamous metaplasia, the columnar glandular epithelium becomes stratified squamous, with keratin squames shed into the lumen together with sloughed epithelial cells (Figure 10). The metaplastic epithelium may be observed in the glandular acini only or even in the ducts. Inflammatory cells (degenerated neutrophils and/or macrophages) may be also present in the lumen, especially if the metaplastic lesion is secondary to chronic prostatitis. In the latter case, squamous metaplasia is a very subtle change and usually a focal finding.

FIGURE 10
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 10. Histology of squamous metaplasia in a dog with Sertoli cell tumor. The glandular alveoli are lined by a pluristratified squamous epithelium with intraluminal accumulation of keratin squames and sloughed epithelial cells (asterisks). Hematoxylin-eosin staining. Bar = 200 μm.

Cytological samples contain aggregates of large, angular and flattened, well-differentiated squamous epithelial cells with abundant pale to light blue cytoplasm and a central, pyknotic or karyorrhectic nucleus. Squamous cells may be admixed with inflammatory cells, bacteria or hyperplastic prostatic cells according to the underlying disease process (13, 14).

This lesion may occur spontaneously in association with the estrogen-producing Sertoli cell tumor (60) or following the administration of estrogens (61). Clinical signs usually related to hyperestrogenism. Short-term exposure to estrogens causes metaplastic changes in the periurethral duct tissue, while changes in the entire gland are secondary to long-term administration of estrogens (62). Interestingly, metaplastic prostates return to the normal morphology once the estrogen stimulation is removed (63, 64). It is likely that estrogens induce proliferation of the basal cells with squamous differentiation rather than androgen-driven differentiation into secretory cells (54). Squamous metaplasia of the canine prostate is not considered a pre-neoplastic change, but it can lead to the formation of cysts and/or abscesses.

Prostatic Tumors

Prostatic tumors are rare in dogs, with variable incidence according to the studies. The lack of specific markers for prostatic cancer in dogs as well as effective diagnostic screening tests makes early diagnosis difficult and therefore the issue of underestimation of cases in the canine population is real.

Prostatic carcinoma is considered androgen-independent and metastasize rapidly in ~70–80% of cases. Reported sites of metastases are regional lymph nodes, pelvic musculature, vertebral bodies, lung, liver, urethra and urinary bladder, colon and rectum, spleen, heart, kidney, distant lymph nodes and adrenal glands (36). Although there is a common belief that there is an increased risk of carcinoma in castrated dogs (65, 66), carcinoma of the prostate occurs with the same prevalence in sexually intact and neutered dogs (6771).

Many dogs do not show any clinical signs until late in the course of the disease. When present, the most common clinical signs—excluding those related to potential metastases—are prostatomegaly, painful abdominal palpation, stranguria, dysuria, hematuria, constipation, tenesmus, anorexia, weight loss, pain and paresis of hind limb (26, 28).

Grossly, the prostate may be asymmetrically and irregularly enlarged (Figure 11A), with or without invasion of the surrounding organs. In other cases, the prostate present little changes and only a slight enlargement may be detected.

FIGURE 11
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 11. Gross (A) and cytological (B,C) features of prostatic carcinoma in dogs. (A) The prostate is irregularly enlarged, showing a multinodular gross aspect (entire prostate removed from the connections with the urinary bladder and penile urethra). Bar = 1 cm. (B) Prostate aspirate showing a small group of neoplastic cells with cytological features of malignancy (pleomorphism, large nuclei, multiple prominent nucleoli). Prostate FNA, smear. Wright-Giemsa stain. Bar = 25 μm. (C) Prostate aspirate showing neoplastic epithelial cells from a urothelial carcinoma of the prostate with intracytoplasmic vacuoles containing bright pink material (arrows). Prostate FNA, smear. Wright-Giemsa stain. Bar = 20 μm.

Canine prostatic carcinoma is classified into prostatic adenocarcinoma (AC) and prostatic urothelial carcinoma (UC), although a mixed phenotype can also occur (32). In classical cases, cytological samples consist of variably sized clusters, sheets or scattered single cells with marked criteria of malignancy, including single to multiple nuclei, coarse to clumped chromatin, multiple and prominent nucleoli, severe anisocytosis and anisokaryosis, nuclear molding (Figure 11B). Mitoses are common and may be bizarre (13, 14). Prostatic adenocarcinoma and prostatic urothelial carcinoma may be difficult to distinguish cytologically. Some acinar structures may be observed in AC, while urothelial cells show tailed shapes and sporadic cytoplasmic vacuoles with bright-pink material (Figure 11C), although these features may not be consistently present in all cases and are not pathognomonic for UC (13, 14).

Prostatic adenocarcinoma (AC) originates from the glandular epithelium and displays a high degree of morphological heterogeneity in terms of growth patterns and histological subtypes, occurring individually or in combination. The simple tubular pattern is characterized by the formation of small acini and tubules (Figure 12A). The solid pattern is composed of solid sheets, cords or isolate pleomorphic epithelial cells, that can occasionally be spindle shaped (Figure 12B). In the papillary subtypes, cuboidal to columnar cells neoplastic cells form papillary projections with a delicate fibrovascular core within an extended duct (Figure 12C). Cribriform prostatic adenocarcinoma shows irregular fenestrated proliferation of the tumor cells filling the lumen of the gland (Figure 12D), usually with central necrotic debris (comedonecrosis) (Figure 12E) (29, 32). Other less common patterns are micropapillary and sarcomatoid (29, 72).

FIGURE 12
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 12. Histological subtypes of canine prostatic carcinoma. (A) Tubular carcinoma: small tubules lined by neoplastic epithelial cells. Hematoxylin-eosin staining. Bar = 120 μm. (B) Solid carcinoma: pleomorphic neoplastic cells arranged in sold nests without a glandular structure. Hematoxylin-eosin staining. Bar = 40 μm. (C) Papillary carcinoma: neoplastic cells forming papillary projection within the lumen. Hematoxylin-eosin staining. Bar = 120 μm. (D) Cribriform carcinoma: neoplastic cells filling the lumen with the formation of regular fenestrae. Bar = 120 μm. (E) Cribriform carcinoma with central area of necrosis (comedonecrosis) (asterisks). Hematoxylin-eosin staining. Bar = 500 μm. (F) Perineurial invasion: neoplastic cells encircle and proliferate around nerves (asterisk). Hematoxylin-eosin staining. Bar = 120 μm.

In all the subtypes, the mitotic index is moderate to high, except for the tubular pattern that usually exhibits a low mitotic rate. It is not unusual to find additional histologic features, such as lymphatic invasion, squamous differentiation, perineurial invasion (Figure 12F) (29, 32).

Prostatic urothelial carcinoma (UC) arises from the urothelial cells of the prostatic urethra or the periurethral ducts. Neoplastic cells are extremely heterogeneous, ranging from small polyhedral to large cells, with low to abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm, hyperchromatic or large vesicular nucleus and high mitotic index. Melamed-Wolinska bodies—intracytoplasmic eosinophilic bodies—can be an important morphologic feature that helps in the diagnosis of urothelial cell tumors (32).

Distinction between urothelial and prostatic origin can be difficult in most cases, except with the tubular histotype that is more aligned with a diagnosis of prostatic adenocarcinoma. The location of the tumor, close to the prostatic urethra, favors a urothelial origin. Neoplastic cells with cytoplasmic vacuoles (signet cells) and absence of tubules and acini would be more supportive of a UC, although signet cells can also be present in areas of urothelial metaplasia within a prostatic adenocarcinoma. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) can be performed if needed (uroplakin III, CK7), although a definitive marker to differentiate urothelial from glandular origin of the tumor is still lacking. It is common practice to rule in a urothelial carcinoma when IHC reveals immunoreactivity of the neoplastic cells to UPIII and CK7 (73). However, cytokeratin 7, previously thought to be expressed by urothelial cells of the prostatic urethra and periurethral prostatic ducts only (74), is actually found even in the glandular epithelium, so that positive staining can be similarly observed in AC and UC (75). Uroplakin III is more sensitive and specific for urothelial tumors in dogs, although it may be negative in 10% of cases, the staining is not uniform within the same tumor and positive regions may be missed and it is consistently negative in undifferentiated tumors (73). As an additional complicating factor, some tumors show a combination of prostatic adenocarcinoma and urothelial carcinoma (73, 75).

Prostatic squamous cell carcinoma shows closely packed non-keratinizing epithelial cells with moderate to large eosinophilic cytoplasm and occasional prominent intracellular bridges and keratin pearls. Primary prostatic squamous cell carcinoma should be differentiated from urinary bladder squamous carcinoma invading the prostate or prostatic urothelial carcinoma with squamous differentiation.

Mesenchymal prostatic tumors, such as fibrosarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, hemangiosarcoma can occur, with features similar to other organs (7678). Lymphoma has also been described in the canine prostatic gland, mainly in the disseminated disease (79, 80).

In humans, prostate carcinoma may evolve from a well-defined and characterized lesion, called prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN), that defines a proliferation of atypical epithelial cells within preexisting ducts and acini (15). High-grade PIN (HGPIN) lesions have been described in the prostate of dogs with and without prostate cancer (8083). Typical HGPIN consists of glands with nuclear crowding and stratification, luminal cells with enlarged nuclei, large and prominent nucleoli and size and shape variation (84). A critical review of the literature describing these lesions in the canine prostate (32) have evidenced the possibility that these lesions may be or (a) expression of a retrograde invasion of the normal glands by adjacent neoplastic glands; or (b) reactive lesions secondary to an inflammatory reaction in the surrounding stroma or (c) atypical/dysplastic changes. Therefore, a certain degree of caution should be applied when reporting these lesions in a diagnostic setting.

Prostatic Calculi, Corpora Amylacea and Polyglucosan Bodies

In the human prostate, prostatic calculi are usually associated with inflammation, prostatic hyperplasia or prostatic cancer (15), while this correlation has not been demonstrated in dogs yet. Prostatic calculi can be infrequently seen in the canine prostate as an incidental finding (85, 86). They can originate from the bladder through the prostatic urethra and then the prostatic duct system (exogenous calculi) or form within the prostate itself, usually within a cyst (endogenous calculi). Exogenous calculi contain constituents of the urine, while endogenous calculi can be formed by the precipitation of element present in the prostatic secretions (87).

Corpora amylacea are eosinophilic inspissated secretions that usually assume characteristic concentrical lamellations (15). They are extremely common in the normal human prostate gland, while they are rarely seen in the dog prostate. They can calcify and contributes to the formation of prostatic endogenous calculi. PAS-positive polyglucosan bodies have been described in the smooth muscle cells of the canine prostatic stroma by Kamiya et al. (88), most commonly in aged animals.

Feline Prostate Pathology

Prostatic Tumors

Prostatic disorders in cats are exceedingly rare, and, despite the lack of studies on the prevalence of prostatic lesions in cats, prostatic carcinoma is the most commonly reported lesion in case descriptions available in the literature (8995). Affected cats are 6–11 years old and are usually presented with hematuria, dysuria, stranguria, acute urinary obstruction, urinary incontinence, occasionally constipation, inappetence, weight loss and lethargy. Prostatic carcinoma has been described both in intact (91, 94, 95) and neutered (8993, 96) animals without a specific breed predisposition (domestic shorthair, mixed breed, domestic longhair, Siberian) (97). Definitive risk factors have not been identified due to the sparse number of reports and lack of epidemiologic data. Prostatic carcinoma in cats has not been classified in any histologic subtypes, although most cases are characterized by high degree of cellular pleomorphism, occasional scirrhous reaction, acinar or solid or tubular growth pattern, high mitotic rate and lymphovascular invasion. One case of sarcomatoid carcinoma with neoplastic epithelial cells arranged in acini and tubules surrounded by haphazardly arranged pleomorphic spindle cells has been described by Zambelli et al. (93).

Prostatitis

Bacterial prostatitis is also less common in cats than in dogs, presumably due to the uncommon occurrence of other predisposing factors, such as primary prostatic hyperplasia and squamous metaplasia. In addition, most of all the cases of bacterial prostatitis begin secondary to the invasion of pathogens in the urinary tract (98), but bacterial urinary tract infections occur much less frequently in cats than in dogs, with only 1–2% of cats affected during their lifetime (99). Prostatitis in cats may be acute or chronic (100, 101), with predominant neutrophilic or pyogranulomatous inflammation. Occasional abscesses may be observed at gross examination in animals with fever, anorexia, and constipation (102). The most common isolate in cats is Escherichia coli (100, 102).

Squamous Metaplasia

Squamous metaplasia of the prostate with secondary prostatitis has been described in only one cat with interstitial cell neoplasm in a retained testis (103). The histologic features of this lesion are similar to those observed in dogs with prostatic glandular acini lined by multiple layers of squamous epithelial cells.

Paraprostatic Cyst

Only a single case of paraprostatic cyst has been reported in a 3-year-old neutered male domestic, short-haired cat with a history of pollakiuria. The cyst was lined with transitional epithelium multifocally continuous with the epithelium of the prostatic ducts (104).

Conclusions

This overview covers all the different disorders affecting the canine and feline prostate providing comprehensive clinical and pathological aspects that may inform pathologists and practitioners in their diagnostic investigation and examination of clinical cases, recognizing the difficulties in making a final diagnosis due to non-specific clinical signs and overlap of different diseases. On the other side, as highlighted by the amount of information included in this review, prostatic diseases are not as infrequent as believed and comparative studies may actually reveal new pathological lesions or pathogenesis that will add another level of complexity to these disorders in domestic animals.

Author Contributions

CP, CF-A, and RL-A conceived and designed this review, performed literature review and data collection, wrote the manuscript, and reviewed the drafts. CP supervised the project. All authors have read and approved the final submitted manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2022.881232/full#supplementary-material

References

1. Mukaratirwa S, Chitura T. Canine subclinical prostatic disease: histological prevalence and validity of digital rectal examination as a screening test. J S Afr Vet Assoc. (2007) 78:66–8. doi: 10.4102/jsava.v78i2.292

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Evans HE, Christensen GC. The urogenital system. In: Miller's Anatomy of the Dog. Philadelphia, WB: Saunders (1993). p. 514–516.

Google Scholar

3. Dimitrov R, Yonkova P, Vladova D, Kostov D. Computed tomography imaging of the topographical anatomy of canine prostate. Trakia J Sci. (2010) 8:78–82.

Google Scholar

4. Saldivia PMM, Seguel BF. Anatomy of the Prostate Gland and Seminal Colículos of the Canine (Canis lupus familiaris). Anatomy Physiol Biochem Int J. (2019) 5:555670. doi: 10.19080/APBIJ.2019.05.555670

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Lowseth LA, Gerlach RF, Gillett NA, Muggenburg BA. Age-related changes in the prostate and testes of the beagle dog. Vet Pathol. (1990) 27:347–53. doi: 10.1177/030098589002700507

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Kawakami E, Tsutsui T, Ogasa A. Histological observation of the reproductive organs of the male dog from birth to sexual maturity. J Vet Med Sci. (1991) 53:41–48. doi: 10.1292/jvms.53.241

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Leav I, Schelling KH, Adams JY, Merk FB, Alroy J. Role of canine basal cells in postnatal prostatic development, induction of hyperplasia, and sex hormone-stimulated growth; and the ductal origin of carcinoma. Prostate. (2001) 48:210–24. doi: 10.1002/pros.1100

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Dorso L, Chanut F, Howroyd P, Burnett R. Variability in weight and histological appearance of the prostate of beagle dogs used in toxicology studies. Toxicol Pathol. (2008) 36:917–25. doi: 10.1177/0192623308324958

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Ruel Y, Barthez PY, Mailles A, Begon D. Ultrasonographic evaluation of the prostate in healthy intact dogs. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. (1998) 39:212–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8261.1998.tb00342.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Cazzuli G, Damian JP, Molina E, Pessina P. Post-castration prostatic involution: a morphometric and endocrine study of healthy canines and those with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Reprod Dom Anim. (2021) 57:157–64. doi: 10.1111/rda.14036

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Johnston SD, Root Kustritz MVR, Olson PNS. Disorders of the Canine Prostate. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders (2001). p.1029.

Google Scholar

12. Lai CL, van der Ham R, van Lendeers G, van der Lugt J, Teske E. Comparative characterization of the canine normal prostate in intact and castrated animals. Prostate. (2008) 68:498–507. doi: 10.1002/pros.20721

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Clark SD, Nabity MB. Male reproductive tract: prostate, testes, penis, and semen. In: Valenciano AC, Cowell RL editors. Cowell and Tyler's Diagnostic Cytology and Hematology of the Dog and Cat, 5th edition. St Louis, MO: Elsevier (2019). p. 406–11.

Google Scholar

14. Solano-Gallego L, Masserdotti C. Reproductive system. In: Raskin RE, Meyer DJ, editors. Canine and Feline Cytology: A Color Atlas and Interpretation Guide. St Louis, MO: Elsevier (2016). p. 313–52.

Google Scholar

15. Humphrey PA. Prostate Pathology. Chicago: ASCP Press (2003). p. 2–494.

Google Scholar

16. Hanyu S, IwanagaT, Kano K, Fujita T. Distribution of serotonin-immunoreactive paraneurons in the lower urinary tract of dogs. Am J Anat. (1987) 180:349–56. doi: 10.1002/aja.1001800405

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Angelsen A, Mecsei R, Sandvik AK, Waldum HL. Neuroendocrine cells in the prostate of the rat, guinea pig, cat and dog. Prostate. (1997) 33:18–25. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0045(19970915)33:1<18::aid-pros4>3.0.co;2-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Ismail HR, Landry F, Aprikian AG, Chevalier S. Androgen ablation promotes neuroendocrine cell differentiation in dog and human prostate. Prostate. (2002) 51:117–25. doi: 10.1002/pros.10066

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Dimitrov R, Gulubova M, Vodenicharov A. Localization of serotonin-and chromogranin A-positive neuroendocrine cells in feline prostate gland. Bulg J Vet Med. (2010) 13:154–61.

Google Scholar

20. Wang Y, Hayward S, Cao M, Thayer K, Cunha G. Cell differentiation lineage in the prostate. Differentiation. (2001) 68:270–9. doi: 10.1046/j.1432-0436.2001.680414.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Akter SH, Lean FZX, Lu J, Grieco V, Palmieri C. Different growth patterns of canine prostatic carcinoma suggests different models of tumor-initiating cells. Vet Pathol. (2015) 52:1027–33. doi: 10.1177/0300985815574008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Palmieri C, Story M, Lean FZX, Akter SH, Grieco V, De Marzo AM. Diagnostic utility of Cytokeratin-5 for the identification of proliferative inflammatory atrophy in the Canine Prostate. J Comp Pathol. (2018) 158:1–5. doi: 10.1016/j.jcpa.2017.10.172

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Leroy BE, Northrup N. Prostate cancer in dogs: comparative and clinical aspects. Vet J. (2009) 180:149–62. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2008.07.012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Costa CD, Justo AA, Kobayashi PE, Story MM, Palmieri C, Laufer Amorim R et al. Characterization of OCT3/4, Nestin, NANOG, CD44 and CD24 as stem cell markers in canine prostate cancer. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. (2019) 108:21–8. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2019.01.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Krawiec DR, Heflin D. Study of prostatic disease in dogs: 177 cases (1981–1986). J Am Vet Med Assoc. (1992) 200:1119–22.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

26. Smith J. Canine prostatic disease: a review of anatomy, pathology, diagnosis and treatment. Theriogenology. (2008) 70:375–83. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.04.039

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Foster RA. Common lesions in the male reproductive tract of cats and dogs. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. (2012) 42:527–45. doi: 10.1016/j.cvsm.2012.01.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Levy X, Nizanski W, von Heimendahl A, Mimouni P. Diagnosis of common prostatic conditions in dogs: an update. Reprod Domest Anim. (2014) 49 (Suppl. 2):50–7. doi: 10.1111/rda.12296

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Palmieri C, Lean FZ, Akter SH, Romussi S, Grieco VA. Retrospective analysis of 111 canine prostatic samples: histopathological findings and classification. Res Vet Sci. (2014) 97:568–73. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2014.11.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Polisca A, Troisi A, Fontaine E, Menchetti L, Fontbonne AA. Retrospective study of canine prostatic diseases from 2002 to 2009 at the Alfort Veterinary College in France. Theriogenology. (2016) 85:835–40. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2015.10.030

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Berry SJ, Strandberg JD, Saunders WJ, Coffey DS. Development of canine benign prostatic hyperplasia with age. Prostate. (1986) 9:363–73. doi: 10.1002/pros.2990090406

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Palmieri C, Foster RA, Grieco V, Fonseca-Alves CE, Wood GA, Culp WTN, et al. Histopathological terminology standards for the reporting of prostatic epithelial lesions in dogs. J Comp Pathol. (2019) 171:30–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcpa.2019.07.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Barsanti JA, Finco DR. Canine prostatic diseases. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. (1986) 16:587–99. doi: 10.1016/s0195-5616(86)50063-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Mahapokai V, van Sluijs FJ, Schalken JA. Models for studying benign prostatic hyperplasia. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. (2000) 3:28–33. doi: 10.1038/sj.pcan.4500391

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Gobello C, Corrada Y. Noninfectious prostatic diseases in dogs. Compend Contin Educ. (2002) 24:99–107.

Google Scholar

36. Sun F, Bae-Diaz C, Sanchez-Margallo FM. Canine prostate models in preclinical studies of minimally invasive interventions: part II, benign prostatic hyperplasia models. Transl Androl Urol. (2017) 6:547–55. doi: 10.21037/tau.2017.03.62

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Beining FW, Urhausen C, Wolf K, Schmicke M, Rohn K, Schuler G et al. Rhodesian Ridgebacks have an increased risk to develop benign prostatic hyperplasia. Reprod Domest Anim. (2020) 55:283–92. doi: 10.1111/rda.13616

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. DeKlerk DP, Coffey DS, Ewing LL, McDermott IR, Reiner WG, Robinson CH et al. Comparison of spontaneous and experimentally induced canine prostatic hyperplasia. J Clin Invest. (1979) 64:842–9. doi: 10.1172/JCI109532

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Cowan LA, Barsanti JA, Crowell W, Brown J. Effects of castration on chronic bacterial prostatitis in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc. (1991) 199:346–50.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

40. Johnston SD, Kamolpatana K, Root-Kustritz MV, Johnston GR. Prostatic disorders in the dog. Anim Reprod Sci. (2000) 60–61:405–15. doi: 10.1016/s0378-4320(00)00101-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Dorfman M, Barsanti JA, Dorfman M, Barsanti JA. CVT update: treatment of canine bacterial prostatitis. In: Bonagura JD, Kirk WRW editors. Current Veterinary Therapy XII. Philadelphia: WB Saunders (1995). p. 1029–32.

Google Scholar

42. Barr SC, Eilts BE, Roy AF, Miller R. Brucella suis biotype 1 infection in a dog. J Am Vet Med Assoc. (1986) 189:686–7.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

43. Reed LT, Balog KA, Boes KM, Messick JB, Miller MA. Pathology in practice. Granulomatous pneumonia, prostatitis and uveitis with intralesional yeasts consistent with Blastomyces. J Am Vet Med Assoc. (2010) 236:411–3. doi: 10.2460/javma.236.4.411

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Totten AK, Ridgway MD, Sauberli DS. Blastomyces dermatitidis prostatic and testicular infection in eight dogs (1992-2005). J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. (2011) 47:413–8. doi: 10.5326/JAAHA-MS-5622

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. L'Abee-Lund TM, Heiene R, Friis NF, Ahrens P, Sorum H. Mycoplasma canis and urogenital disease in dogs in Norway. Vet Rec. (2003) 153:231–5. doi: 10.1136/vr.153.8.231

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Mir F, Fontaine E, Reyes-Gomez E, Carlus M, Fontbonne A. Subclinical leishmaniasis associated with infertility and chronic prostatitis in a dog. J Small Anim Pract. (2012) 53:419–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-5827.2012.01224.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Kutzler MA. Prostatic disease. In: Eric M, editor. Small Animal Soft Tissue Surgery. Somerset: Wiley Blackwell (2012). p. 668.

Google Scholar

48. Bigliardi E, Denti L, Bertocchi M, di Ianni F, Rizzi M, Passeri B, et al. Metaplastic ossification of a giant paraprostatic cyst in a dog: a case report. Top Companion Anim Med. (2022) 48:100639. doi: 10.1016/j.tcam.2022.100639

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Vititoe KP, Grosso FV, Thomovsky S, Lim CK, Heng HG. Inguinal herniation of a mineralized paraprostatic cyst in a dog. Can Vet J. (2017) 58:1309–12.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

50. White RAS, Herrtage ME, Dennis R. The diagnosis and management of paraprostatic and prostatic retention cysts in the dog. J Small Anim Pract. (1987) 28:551–74.

Google Scholar

51. Zekas LJ, Forrest LJ, Swainson S, Phillips LA. Radiographic diagnosis: mineralised paraprostatic cyst in a dog. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. (2004) 45:310–1. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8261.2004.04058.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Renfrew H, Barrett EL, Bradley KJ, Barr FJ. Radiographic and ultrasonographic features of canine paraprostatic cysts. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. (2008) 49:444–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8261.2008.00404.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Nizanski W, Levy X, Ochota M. Pasikowska J. Pharmacological treatment for common prostatic conditions in dogs – benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostatitis: an update. Reprod Domest Anim. (2014) 49 (Suppl. 2):8–15. doi: 10.1111/rds.12297

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Hohbach C. Ultrastructural and enzyme-histochemical studies of the prostate of the dog under the effect of estradiol. Beitr Pathol. (1977) 160:260–73. doi: 10.1016/s0005-8165(77)80051-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Putzi MJ, De Marzo AM. Morphologic transitions between proliferative inflammatory atrophy and high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Urology. (2000) 56:828–32. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(00)00776-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Fonseca-Alves CE, Rodrigues MMP, de Moura VMBD, Rogatto SR, Laufer-Amorim R. Alterations of c-myc, nkk3.1, and E-cadherin expression in canine prostate carcinogenesis. Microsc Res Tech. (2013) 76:1250–6. doi: 10.1002/jemt.22292

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Rodrigues MMP, Rema A, Gartner MF, Laufer-Amorim R. Role of adhesion molecules and proliferation in hyperplastic, preneoplastic and neoplastic lesions in the canine prostate. Pak J Biol Sci. (2013) 16:1324–9. doi: 10.3923/pjbs.2013.1324.1329

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

58. de Godoy Fernandes G, Pedrina B, de Faria Lainetti P, Kobayashi PE, Govoni VM, Palmieri C, et al. Morphological and molecular characterization of proliferative inflammatory atrophy in canine prostatic samples. Cancers (Basel). (2021) 13:1887. doi: 10.3390/cancers13081887

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Fonseca-Alves CE, Kobayashi PE, Calderon LGR, Felisbino SL, Rinaldi JdC, Drigo SA et al. Immunohistochemical panel to characterize canine prostate carcinomas according to aberrant p63 expression. PLoS ONE. (2018) 13:e0199173. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199173

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Lindberg R, Jonsson OJ, Kasstrom H. Sertoli cell tumor associated with feminization, prostatitis and squamous metaplasia of the renal tubular epithelium in a dog. J Small Anim Pract. (1976) 17:451–8.

Google Scholar

61. O'Shea JD. Studies on the canine prostate gland. II Prostatic neoplasms. J Comp Path. (1963) 73:244–52. doi: 10.1016/s0368-1742(63)80027-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Paclikova K, Kohout P, Vlasin M. Diagnostic possibilities in the management of canine prostatic disorders. Vet Med. (2006) 51:1–13. doi: 10.17221/5511-VETMED

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Huggins C, Clark PJ. Quantitative studies on prostatic secretion: II. The effect of castration and of estrogen injection on the hyperplastic prostate glands of dogs. J Exp Med. (1940) 72:747–60. doi: 10.1084/jem.72.6.747

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Mulligan RM, Becker DL. Residual tissue changes in male dogs following cessation of orally administered stilbestrol. Am J Pathol. (1947) 23:299–311.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

65. Teske E, Naan EC, Van Dijk EM, Van Garderen E, Schalken JA. Canine prostate carcinoma: epidemiological evidence of an increased risk in castrated dogs. Mol Cell Endocrinol. (2002) 197:251–5. doi: 10.1016/S0303-7207(02)00261-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

66. Bryan JN, Keeler MR, Henry CJ, Bryan ME, Hahn AW, Caldwell CW, et al. Population study of neutering status as a risk factor for canine prostate cancer. Prostate. (2007) 67:1174–81. doi: 10.1002/pros.20590

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

67. Shidaifat F, Gharaibeh M, Bani-Ismail Z. Effect of castration on extracellular matrix remodeling and angiogenesis of the prostate gland. Endocr J. (2007) 54:521–9. doi: 10.1507/endocrj.K07-009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

68. L'Eplattenier HF, van Nimwegen SA, Van Sluijs FJ, Kirpensteijn J. Partial prostatectomy using Nd: YAG laser for management of canine prostate carcinoma. Vet Surg. (2006) 35:406–411. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2006.00165.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

69. Schrank M, Romagnoli S. Prostatic neoplasia in the intact and castrated dog: how dangerous is castration? Animals (Basel). (2020) 10:85. doi: 10.3390/ani10010085

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

70. Obradovich J, Walshaw R, Goullaud E. The influence of castration on the development of prostatic carcinoma in the dog 43 Cases (1978–1985). J Vet Intern Med. (1987) 1:183–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.1987.tb02013.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

71. Bell RW, Klausner JS, Hayden DW, Feeney DA, Johnston SD. Clinical and pathologic features of prostatic adenocarcinoma in sexually intact and castrated dogs: 31 cases (1970-1987). J Am Vet Med Assoc. (1991) 199:1623–30.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

72. Lai CL, van den Ham R, van Leenders G, van der Lugt J, Mol JA, Teske E. Histopathological and immunohistochemical characterization of canine prostate cancer. Prostate. (2008) 68:477–88. doi: 10.1002/pros.20720

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

73. Meuten D. Tumors in Domestic Animals. Fifth edition. Iowa: Iowa Press (2020).

Google Scholar

74. Steinberg J. Immunochemistry of prostatic carcinoma. Vet Clin Pathol. (2008) 37:143. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-165X.2008.00034.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

75. Le Roy BE, Nadella MVP, Toribio BE, Leav I, Rosol TJ. Canine prostate carcinomas express markers of urothelial and prostatic differentiation. Vet Pathol. (2004) 41:131–40. doi: 10.1354/vp.41-2-131

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

76. Hayden DW, Bartges JW, Bell FW, Klausner JS. Prostatic hemangiosarcoma in a dog: clinical and pathologic findings. J Vet Diagn Invest. (1992) 4:2009–211. doi: 10.1177/104063879200400222

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

77. Hayden DW, Klausner JS, Waters DJ. Prostatic leiomyosarcoma in a dog. J Vet Diagn Invest. (1999) 11:283–6. doi: 10.1177/104063879901100313

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

78. McEntee K. Reproductive Pathology of Domestic Mammals. New York: Academic Press (1990). p. 338.

Google Scholar

79. Mainwaring CJ. Primary lymphoma of the prostate on a dog. J Small Anim Pract. (1990) 31:617–19.

Google Scholar

80. Assin R, Baldi R, Citro G, Spugnini EP. Prostate as sole unusual recurrence site of lymphoma in a dog. In Vivo. (2008) 22:75–7.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

81. Waters DJ, Bostwick DG. The canine prostate is a spontaneous model of intraepithelial neoplasia and prostate cancer progression. Anticancer Res. (1997) 17:1467–70.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

82. Waters DJ, Hayden DW, Bell FW, Klausner JS, Qian J, Bostwick DG. Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in dogs with spontaneous prostate cancer. Prostate. (1997) 30:92–7. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0045(19970201)30:2<92::aid-pros4>3.0.co;2-m

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

83. Aquilina JW, McKinney L, Pacelli A, Richman LK, Waters DJ, Thompson I et al. High grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in military working dogs with and without prostate cancer. Prostate. (1998) 36:189–93. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0045(19980801)36:3<189::aid-pros7>3.0.co;2-c

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

84. Zhou M, Magi-Galluzzi C. Prostatic adenocarcinoma, prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and intraductal carcinoma. Surg Pathol Clin. (2008) 1:43–75. doi: 10.1016/j.path.2008.08.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

85. Lumb WV. Prostatic calculi in a dog. J Am Vet Med Assoc. (1952) 121:14–16.

Google Scholar

86. Park B, Choo SH. The burden of prostatic calculi is more important than the presence. Asian J Androl. (2017) 19:482–5. doi: 10.4103/1008-682X.181193

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

87. Huyn JS. Clinical significance of prostatic calculi: a review. World J Mens Health. (2018) 36:15–21. doi: 10.5534/wjmh.17018

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

88. Kamiya S, Yoshimura H, Okada K, Yoshida A, Fukuda Y, Yamamoto M et al. Polyglucosan bodies in the prostatic stromal smooth muscles of aged dogs. Histol Histopathol. (2017) 32:499–502. doi: 10.14670/HH-11-818

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

89. Caney SM, Holt PE, Day MJ, Rudorf H, Gruffydd-Jones TJ. Prostatic carcinoma in two cats. J Small Anim Pract. (1998) 39:140–3. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-5827.1998.tb03619.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

90. Hubbard BS, Vulgamott JC, Liska WD. Prostatic adenocarcinoma in a cat. J Am Vet Med Assoc. (1990) 197:1493–4.

Google Scholar

91. LeRoy BE, Lech ME. Prostatic carcinoma causing urethral obstruction and obstipation in a cat. J Feline Med Surg. (2004) 6:397–400. doi: 10.1016/j.jfms.2004.04.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

92. Tursi M, Costa T, Valenza F, Aresu L. Adenocarcinoma of the disseminated prostate in a cat. J Feline Med Surg. (2008) 10:600–2. doi: 10.1016/j.jfms.2008.02.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

93. Zambelli D, Cunto M, Raccagni R, Merlo B, Morini M, Bettini G. Successful surgical treatment of a prostatic biphasic tumor (sarcomatoid carcinoma) in a cat. J Feline Med Surg. (2010) 12:161–5. doi: 10.1016/j.jfms.2009.07.016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

94. Lapshin A, Kondratova I. Prostatic adenocarcinoma in tomcat. Clin Case Rep Vetpharma. (2015) 3.

Google Scholar

95. De Oliveira M, Barni B, Schuster L, Gerardi D, Contesini E, Alievi M, et al. Feline prostatic carcinoma. Acta Sci Vet. (2019) 47. doi: 10.22456/1679-9216.98793

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

96. Hawe RS. What is your diagnosis? Prostatic adenocarcinoma. J Am Vet Med Assoc. (1983) 182:1257–8.

Google Scholar

97. Stans J. Clinical aspects of feline prostate cancer: a literature review. J Hellenic Vet Med Soc. (2021) 72:2803–8.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

98. Bartges JW, Barsanti JA. Bacterial urinary tract infections in cats. In: Bonagura JD, editor. Kirk's Current Veterinary Therapy XIII. Saunders, Philadelphia (PA): WB (2000). p. 880–2.

Google Scholar

99. Dorsch R, Teichmann-Knorrn S, Lund HS. Urinary tract infection and subclinical bacteriuria in cats: a clinical update. J Feline Med Surg. (2019) 21:1023–38. doi: 10.1177/1098612X19880435

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

100. Roura X, Camps-Palau MA, Lloret A, Garcia F, Espada I. Bacterial prostatitis in a cat. J Vet Intern Med. (2002) 16:593–7. doi: 10.1892/0891-6640(2002)016 <0593:bpiac>2.3.co;2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

101. Pointer E, Murray L. Chronic prostatitis, cystitis, pyelonephritis, and balanoposthitis in a cat. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. (2011) 47:258–61. doi: 10.5326/JAAHA-MS-5627

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

102. Mordecai A, Liptak JM, Hofstede T, Stalker M, Kruth S. Prostatic abscess in a neutered cat. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. (2008) 44:90–4. doi: 10.5326/0440090

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

103. Tucker AR, Smith JR. Prostatic squamous metaplasia in a cat with interstitial cell neoplasia in a retained testis. Vet Pathol. (2008) 45:905e9. doi: 10.1354/vp.45-6-905

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

104. Newell SM, Mahaffey MB, Binhazim A, Greene CE. Paraprostatic cyst in a cat. J Small Anim Pract. (1992) 33:399–401.

Google Scholar

Keywords: dog, cat, prostate, pathology, review

Citation: Palmieri C, Fonseca-Alves CE and Laufer-Amorim R (2022) A Review on Canine and Feline Prostate Pathology. Front. Vet. Sci. 9:881232. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.881232

Received: 22 February 2022; Accepted: 04 May 2022;
Published: 26 May 2022.

Edited by:

Cristina Gobello, National University of La Plata, Argentina

Reviewed by:

Maria Anjos Pires, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal
Rita Payan Carreira, University of Evora, Portugal

Copyright © 2022 Palmieri, Fonseca-Alves and Laufer-Amorim. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Chiara Palmieri, c.palmieri@uq.edu.au

These authors share first authorship

Download