Skip to main content

BRIEF RESEARCH REPORT article

Front. Vet. Sci., 02 May 2023
Sec. Parasitology
Volume 10 - 2023 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2023.1177218

Pathological effects due to metacercariae of Clinostomum piscidium migration in snakeskin gourami (Trichopodus pectoralis) in Thailand

  • 1The International Graduate Program of Veterinary Science and Technology (VST), Department of Veterinary Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
  • 2Department of Veterinary Microbiology and Center of Excellence in Fish Disease, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
  • 3Parasitology Unit and Biomarkers in Animal Parasitology Research Group, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand

Clinostomum spp. is a fish-borne pathogen and a digenetic trematode with a global range. Despite its zoonotic relevance, the pathogenic impact of the parasite in Thai aquaculture is currently unclear. The present study deals with the pathogenic changes that fluke causes in their host, Trichopodus pectoralis, and the molecular confirmation of the Clinostomum piscidium by targeting 18 s rDNA and ITS gene. The metacercariae of C. piscidium were discovered in the body cavity of infected fish. The gross pathological examination revealed a few white migratory tracks on the surface of the liver and spleen. The migratory track showed histologically as a primary hemorrhage and necrosis of hepatic cells surrounded by a layer of macrophages and epithelioid cells, inflammatory cells, and eosinophilic granular cells in the cytoplasm of liver cells and close to the epithelial cells of the intestine. Also, the migratory track in the spleen appeared as a marked decrease of Red Blood Cell (RBC) count and changes in the necrotic tissue. Infection with this metacercaria produced hepatic tissue injury, which disrupted hepatic metabolism and decreased body weight in the fish hosts. The findings of the study suggest that the pathological effect of C. piscidium on farm T. pectoralis can cause significant economic loss by stunting fish development and predisposing fish to opportunistic pathogens in the environment. Hence, the treatment and control of C. piscidium infections are crucial for the viability of the aquaculture sector since this parasite has been found to cause pathological damage to the vital organs of fish.

1. Introduction

The snakeskin gourami (Trichopodus pectoralis, Regan 1910; Anabantoidei: Osphronemidae) is one of the most common air-breathing freshwater fishes in the Indo-China Peninsula (1, 2). It is one of the five most significant freshwater species farmed in Thailand (FAO, 2021; DoF Thailand, 2018). However, the rising prevalence of parasitic infections is one of the main challenges to cultivating T. pectoralis. In the past, it has been reported that infections caused by Clinostomum spp. have been the most important problem with T. pectoralis in pond culture, resulting in weight loss and a reduction in growth (3). Clinostomum spp. could also serve as a cause of secondary infection for fish species and zoonotic infections for humans (4). Previously, Clinostomum spp. has been reported to cause both farmed T. pectoralis and humans in Thailand (3, 5, 6).

In most aquatic ecosystems, fishes are hosts to parasites, and sometimes, these parasites can affect fish biology and health (7–10). Some of the most dramatic cases occur when fishes are intermediate hosts for parasites. It has been shown that parasites reduce fish production, affect fish health, make fish more vulnerable to other infections, and even result in fish deaths (11–13). Fish parasites lead to a reduction in economic returns and a decline in the availability of fish as protein-rich sources (14). Therefore, understanding the etiology of parasitic disorders, which influences the choice of possible control, requires accurate identification of parasites down to the genus and species level to apply an effective control or preventive approach.

Trichopodus pectoralis is a commercially significant aquaculture species in Thailand, necessitating parasitic research that ultimately leads to sustainable aquaculture management. Despite the commercial importance of farmed T. pectoralis in Thailand, the molecular identification of Clinostomum spp. and pathological studies have yet to be addressed. Therefore, this study performed molecular identification of Clinostomum parasites on T. pectoralis culturing central part of Thailand, and by analyzing the pathological parasite effect, this research emphasizes the information on the overall scenario of parasites burden in the farmed T. pectoralis.

2. Methods

2.1. Study area and collection of parasites

The protocols for this research were authorized by the animal ethical requirements of Chulalongkorn University in Thailand, Protocol number: IBC 223103 and IACUC 2231043. Live specimens of 102 T. pectoralis were collected from March to November 2022 from aquaculture farms in Samut Prakan (Latitude:13°35′57.6″N and Longitude: 100°35′48.3″E), Samut Songkhram (Latitude: 13° 24′ 52.42″ N and Longitude:100° 00′ 9.50″ E), Samut Sakhon (Latitude:13° 32′ 51.11″ N and Longitude:100° 16′ 25.03″ E), and Kanchanaburi (Latitude: 14°00′14″ N and Longitude: 99°32′53″ E) province in Thailand. The fish were brought to the Parasitology Unit of the Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand, in aerated polyethylene and maintained in aquaria under proper aeration. Tricaine methane sulphonate (250 mg/L) was used to euthanize the fish. A standard protocol was followed for examining the fish for parasites (15). Necropsy was performed, and the exposed body cavity was checked for parasites with the naked eye. After counting the parasites, specific samples were processed for further examination.

2.2. Histopathological analysis

Infected liver, spleen, and intestine tissues were properly washed with water before being stored in buffered Formalin for around 24 h for histological examinations. Following thorough washing, the specimens were dehydrated in a succession of Ethyl Alcohols (50, 70, 90, and 100%) and Acetone before being cleared in Methyl Benzoate (16). After dehydration in a graded ethanol series, samples were embedded in paraffin. Paraffin blocks were formed from melted wax kept at 58°C. Histopathology and cellular infiltration at the attachment site were examined by cutting serial sections of 5 μm thickness using the Microtec rotatory microtome (Germany), then staining them with Heidenhain’s Hematoxylin and Eosin. The DPX-mounted sections were examined using an Olympus CX31 light microscope, and the photographs were taken using a Nikon Y-TV55 camera connected to the microscope.

2.3. DNA extraction, PCR, and phylogenetic analysis

All the metacercarial specimens were rinsed in saline before being preserved in 70% ethanol until DNA extraction. Genomic DNA from samples was extracted using a Nuleospin® DNA extraction kit (Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany), following the manufacturer’s instructions. To amplify 18 s rDNA coding gene region, a set of primer pairs (forward 5′-ATTCCGGAGGGAGCCCTG-3′ and reverse 5′-ATCAACCCAGTCAGCACCC-3′) of 395 product size was designed and used. Similarly, the primer pairs (forward 5’-CACCGCCCTGGCGTAATA-3′ and reverse primer 5′-CGACACTTCGAACGATTTCTAGA-3′) of 801 bp product size were used to amplify the sequences of ITS1-5.8S rDNA-ITS2. To amplify the 18 s rDNA coding and ITS1–5.8 S rDNA-ITS2 non-coding region of the parasites, the primer set was designed by using the Pimer3plus server (17). At first, the newly obtained sequences of the 18 s rDNA gene (Supplementary Table 1) and ITS1–5.8 S rDNA-ITS2 (Supplementary Table 2) gene of Clinostomum spp. were aligned with sequences from the Genbank database by MEGA 11. The final comparisons were edited and evaluated by Bioedit v.7.0.5.3 (18). PCR reaction was performed with a total volume of 25 μL, including containing 1 μL of each primer, 4 μL genomic DNA, 12.5 μL 2 × Go Taq® Master Mix (Madison, United States), and 6.5 μL distilled water. The early steps of the PCR cycle condition were carried out with denaturation at 94°C for 5 min; followed by 40 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, annealing at a specific primer at 65/60°C (65°C for 18 s rDNA and 60°C for ITS1-5.8S rDNA-ITS2) for 30 s, and 72°C for 1 min; with a final step of 72°C for 7 min. The PCR products were separated using a 1.5% agarose gel, expected product from PCR was purified using a commercial kit according to the manufacturer’s protocol (NucleoSpin® Gel and PCR Clean-up, Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany) and sequenced in both directions by commercial service for DNA sequencing (Celemics, Korea). Sequences were aligned using ClustalW multiple alignments of BioEdit version 7.0.5.3. The aligned sequences were compared with the identity with available sequences in the GenBank database using the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool.1 The phylogenetic tree was constructed using the maximum likelihood method with a bootstrap method test of phylogeny with 1,000 bootstrap replications; the nucleotides substitution type and the Poisson substitution model were used, and the pairwise distance homology was computed. MEGA X software program was used to construct the final 18 s rDNA and ITS gene phylogenetic tree (19).

3. Results

3.1. Collection of parasites and histopathological analysis

The metacercaria of C. piscidium was collected from the body cavity of the fishes, particularly from the surface of the intestine, spleen, and liver (Supplementary Figure 1). In this study, 21 out of the 102 T. pectoralis were infected with metacercaria of C. piscidium. The overall prevalence of infection was 20.58% and the total number of male and female fish was 41 and 61, respectively. Histologically, the liver was slightly yellowish, and non-infected fish showed a regular arrangement of hepatocytes into cords or plates (Figure 1A). The proliferation of bile ducts in a typical pattern around the portal vein of the liver was noticed (Figure 1B). Metacercariae of C. piscidium were found in a non-encysted form, either freely moving or attaching to the adipose tissue, and migratory track of the metacercaria had seen in the liver and spleen of the infected fish (Figures 1C,D). The liver of the non-infected fish showed significant pathological change and revealed hepatopancreases lying around a portal vein (Figure 1A). The liver of T. pectoralis harboring metacercariae of C. piscidium was marked by the presence of a migratory track and consecutive layers of macrophages and epithelioid cells near the migratory track (Figure 1C). Also, inflammatory cells were noticed in the liver (Figure 1E) followed by eosinophilic cells in the cytoplasm around the bile duct of the liver cell (Figure 1F). The metacercariae of C. piscidium adhered to the serosal surface of the intestine, and eosinophilic granular cells near the epithelial cells in the infected intestine were seen (Figure 1G). Several melano-macrophage cells were also noticed in the infected spleen of T. pectoralis (Figure 1H).

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Light micrographs of visceral organs of Trichopodus pectoralis non-infected (A) and infected (D–H) with Clinostomum piscidium (H&E stained). (A) Liver of non-infected fish shows the normal arrangement of hepatocytes (Hc) into cords or plates. Hepatopancreas (Pa) lies around a portal vein (Pv). (B) Normal arrangement of bile duct (Bd) proliferation around the portal vein of the liver cell, (C) Liver of infected fish shows migratory track (Mt), macrophages (Mp) near the migratory track, (D) Spleen of infected fish shows migratory track where the red blood cells are absent and changes in the necrotic tissue, (E) Inflammatory cells (Ic) in the periphery (asterisk) of the liver cells, (F) Eosinophilic cells (asterisk) in the cytoplasm around the bile duct of the liver cell, (G) Eosinophilic granular cells (Eg; asterisk) near the epithelial cells (Ec) in the infected intestine, and (H) Many melano-macrophage cells (MMc) in the infected spleen.

3.2. Molecular identification

A partial fragment of the 18S rDNA gene was generated using PCR amplification. After sequencing, a contig of 395 bp lengths was formed, for which GenBank Accession No. OP793985 and OP793986 were obtained. A phylogenetic tree was created using Schistosoma spindale as an outgroup and various clinostomid trematode isolates from diverse geographic locations (Figure 2). The phylogenetic tree indicated that our isolate (OP793985 and OP793986) had 95% similarity with Clinostomum piscidium from India (Figure 2; Supplementary Table 3).

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Based on a partial 18S rDNA sequence, the evolutionary relationships between clinostomids were determined using the maximum likelihood method.

For the molecular analysis and generating phylogenetic analysis, two accession numbers OQ396770 and OQ396771, an 801 bp fragment of C. piscidium ITS1-5.8 S rDNA-ITS2 was uploaded to GenBank. Sequences showing a similarity of 100% to (96–99%) were included in the phylogenetic analysis (Supplementary Table 4). The present partial sequence showed 100% homology with C. piscidium, isolated from India and Thailand. The isolated C. piscidium from Colisa fasciata, Bubulcus ibis, and Trichopodus pectoralis, and the current species were closely linked in phylogenetic analysis, putting them in the same clade with a high bootstrap value (98; Figure 3).

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. The phylogenetic tree constructed by maximum likelihood displays Clinostomum piscidium from Trichopodus pectoralis clustering next to the Indian and Thailand Groups of C. piscidium.

4. Discussion

In the present investigation, severe histopathological damage was observed in the liver, spleen, and intestine of infected T. pectoralis, which was marked by the presence of a migratory track produced by the fluke and from host response by chronic inflammation. Granuloma development was revealed by the presence of macrophages and epithelioid cells that had infiltrated the outside rim of the tracks in the liver cells. Similarly, the histopathology of liver damage seen in Channa punctata after it had been parasitized with encysted metacercaria of Euclinostomum heterostomum revealed a wide area of metacercariae cysts and damaged hepatic tissue (20). Two primary mechanisms could be responsible for the formation of the tracks in the hepatic parenchyma: the first is the mechanical damage caused by the prehensile action of the oral sucker, in conjunction with the mechanical abrasion caused by spines on the fluke’s tegument after they have burrowed and migrated in the liver. In addition, it is possible that the toxic effects of the parasite’s excretory-secretory (ES) products are what caused the damage to the hepatic parenchyma (21). The ES products that are secreted by the metacercaria of Clinostomids have been identified as the cysteine protease that can break down the proteins of the host (22, 23). These products include an enzyme necessary for the progression of the immature flukes’ movement and development. They use these compounds to invade the host tissue and get nutrients for themselves (24). Infection with metacercariae of various digenean is often accompanied by increased eosinophils (25, 26). Adeyemo and Agbede (25) observed eosinophilic granular cell growth in the gills of Oreochromis niloticus parasitized with C. tilapia metacercariae. In the heart of Mastacembelus armatus infected with Tetracotyle metacercariae, an increase in the number of eosinophilic granular cells was reported in the region between the host tissue and the parasite (26). In addition, histopathological alterations of Nandus nandus parasitized with C. complanatum were seen in the liver, characterized by loosening of hepatic tissue, eccentrically located nuclei of hepatocytes, and necrosis (20). Milbourne and Howell (27) suggested that the fluke ES product works similarly to interleukin-5 (IL-5), a cytokine that stimulates myeloid precursor cells, causing differentiation and activation of eosinophils. The current research found that the presence of eosinophilic granular cells in the periphery of the liver reflects the host immune response to the ES antigen on the metacercariae. The infection with metacercariae of C. piscidium may compromise the function of the host’s liver and pancreas because of the mechanical damage and toxicity caused by ES products (3). This may occur because ES product causes toxicity. In fish, the liver is considered to be the most important digestive gland since it handles several tasks that are essential to its survival. It substantially impacts the metabolic processes involving carbohydrate, proteins, and lipids, as well as the storage of glycogen. Additionally, this is where the detoxification process takes place (28). Therefore, the massive necrosis of hepatic tissues may be responsible for disturbing the metabolic processes, which may, in turn, disrupt the overall metabolic process of the host, resulting in decreased growth potential.

Melano-macrophages and migratory track were also discovered in the spleen of the infected fish in this study. Increases in pigmented macrophages might be linked to stress and a lack of food (29). To our knowledge this is the first pathological observation of C. piscidium in the spleen and intestine of infected fish. In the only previous histopathological report of the attachment sites of Clinostomum metacercaria in T. pectoralis, an intense hepatic necrosis was found in the liver (3). However, in the species we have studied, this digenea can have significant pathogenic effects on the spleen and intestine, including alterations to necrotic tissue and the presence of eosinophilic granular cells close to the epithelial cells. In addition, the presence of melano-macrophage centers in the infected spleen, can lead to resistant of intracellular bacteria, from which chronic infections may develop (30). A schematic overview of the pathological effect of the C. piscidium in the liver, spleen and intestine of the host fish is shown in Figure 4.

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Schematic diagram of the pathological effects of Clinostomum piscidium on Trichogaster pectoralis.

Localized hemorrhage caused by C. piscidium infection in T. pectoralis has been documented in earlier research (3). Fish infected with clinostomatid metacercaria showed retarded development of fish, according to the study (31). Generally, encysted and non-encysted metacercariae of Clinostomids have been distinguished inside the host tissue. The metacercaria of the C. piscidium species are the only ones that can survive within the cavity of the second intermediate host without being encysted (3). As a result of their ability to move freely through the visceral organs of the host fish, the non-cysted metacercaria of this species has the potential to inflict far more severe injury to infected fish (32). In the current investigation, C. piscidium metacercariae were exclusively collected from the abdominal cavity of infected fish. These provide evidence of the specialized microhabitat that the parasite occupies inside its hosts. Consequently, severe necrosis of hepatic tissues may disrupt metabolic processes, disrupting the fish’s metabolism and stunted development (3).

Furthermore, our data suggest that 18 s rDNA and ITS-1 and ITS-2 sequences are more successful in distinguishing between closely related Clinostomidae taxa (33–35). Figures 2, 3 depicts that our C. piscidium isolate from T. pectoralis is in the same cluster as an Indian C. piscidium isolate from fish and avian hosts.

Overall, Thailand’s commercial aquaculture relies heavily on the Trichopodus pectoralis, although the species is very vulnerable to parasite diseases, especially digenean trematode, due to intensive aquaculture practices. Clinostomum spp. is an economically important group of parasites among freshwater fishes, snails, and birds throughout the globe. Accurate identification of parasites to the genus and species level is necessary for effective management or preventative measures. Previously, no study had been carried out to establish the molecular identification of Clinostomum spp. in T. pectoralis in Thailand. It is possible that the pathogenic effects of C. piscidium on T. pectoralis would inhibit growth and significantly reduce aquaculture production (36, 37). To minimize the economic losses due to Clinostomum infection in fish, preventative measures must be implemented via the biocontrol of snails, or research on vaccine development and chemotherapy deserves particular attention. The results of this research will help the fisheries community, the government, and other interested parties understand how common Clinostomum parasites are in T. pectoralis aquaculture and enhance our capacity to recognize parasites, monitor their behavior, connect their expansion to environmental circumstances, and comprehend their contribution to disease etiology. The research covers an essential aspect of food safety and aquaculture sustainability since T. pectoralis is a significant source of nutrition for the people in Thailand.

Data availability statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/Supplementary material.

Ethics statement

The animal study was reviewed and approved by Chulalongkorn University Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC 2231043). Written informed consent was obtained from the owners for the participation of their animals in this study.

Author contributions

SI and PT conceptualized and reviewed the manuscript. SI, CR, and PT collected data and contributed to data interpretation and manuscript preparation. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This research project is funded by the Thailand Science Research and Innovation Fund, Chulalongkorn University (FOOD66310019).

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Noppadon pirrarat for his kind suggestion on histopathology results. The authors are also thankful to ASEAN-NON ASEAN scholarship.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2023.1177218/full#supplementary-material

Footnotes

References

1. Eegan, C. The Asiatic fishes of: the family Anabantidne. J Zool. (2009) 79:767–87. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1910.tb06972.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Morioka, S, Vongvichith, B, Phommachan, P, and Chantasone, P. Growth and morphological development of laboratory-reared larval and juvenile giant gourami Osphronemus goramy (Perciformes: Osphronemidae). Ichthyol Res. (2013) 60:209–17. doi: 10.1007/s10228-013-0334-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Tansatit, T, Sobhon, P, Sahaphong, S, Sangsuriya, P, and Klinsrithong, S. Prevalence and histopathology of Trichogaster pectoralis Harbouring Metacercaria of Clinostomum piscidium (Southwell and Prashad, 1918) in Central Thailand. Thai J Vet Med. (2014) 44:223–30.

Google Scholar

4. Ukoli, F. On the life history, growth and development from the metacercarial stage to adulthood, of Clinostomum tilapiae Ukoli, 1966. J Helminthol. (1966) 40:215–26. doi: 10.1017/S0022149X00034209

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Tiewchaloern, S, Udomkijdecha, S, Suvouttho, S, Chunchamsri, K, and Waikagul, J. Clinostomum trematode from human eye. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. (1999) 30:382–4.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

6. Yooyen, T, Wongsawad, C, Kumchoo, K, and Chaiyapo, M. A new record of Clinostomum philippinensis (Valasquez, 1959) in Trichogaster microlepis (Gunther, 1861) from bung Borapet, Nakhon Sawan, Thailand. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. (2006) 37:99–103.

Google Scholar

7. Ahmad, I, and Kaur, H. Redescription and histopathology of two species of Myxozoans infecting gills of fingerlings of Indian major carps. J Fish. (2017) 11:001–10.

Google Scholar

8. Ahmad, I, and Kaur, H. Prevalence, site and tissue preference of myxozoan parasites infecting gills of cultured fingerlings of Indian major carps in district Fatehgarh sahib, Punjab (India). J Parasit Dis. (2018) 42:559–69. doi: 10.1007/s12639-018-1035-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Ahmad, I, Ahmed, I, Reshi, QM, Jan, K, Gupta, A, Dar, SA, et al. Morphological, histopathological and molecular characterization of Myxobolus szekelyianus n. sp. (Cnidaria: Myxosporea: Myxobolidae) causing acute gill disease in Schizothorax esocinus (Heckel 1838) from river Jhelum of Kashmir Himalayan region. India Aquac Res. (2021) 52:6537–49. doi: 10.1111/are.15524

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Lafferty, KD. Ecosystem consequences of fish parasites*. J Fish Biol. (2008) 73:2083–93. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2008.02059.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Adams, AM, Murrell, KD, and Cross, JH. Parasites of fish and risks to public health. Rev Sci Tech. (1997) 16:652–60. doi: 10.20506/rst.16.2.1059

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Kaur, H, and Ahmad, I. Morphological description of Myxobolus markiwi n. sp. (Cnidaria: Myxosporea: Myxozoa) infecting gills of fingerlings of aquaculture ponds from Punjab. India Species. (2016) 17:141–9.

Google Scholar

13. Kaur, H, and Ahmad, I. A report on two new myxozoan parasites infecting gills of fingerlings of Indian major carps cultured in nursery ponds in Punjab (India). J Parasit Dis. (2017) 41:987–96. doi: 10.1007/s12639-017-0923-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Barber, I. Parasites grow larger in faster growing fish hosts. Int J Parasitol. (2005) 35:137–43. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2004.11.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Fernando, C. H. (1972). Methods for the study of freshwater fish parasites.

Google Scholar

16. Jithila, PJ, and Prasadan, PK. Histopathology and other aspects of the Clinostomum Complanatum infection in the freshwater fish, Pseudosphromenus Cupanus from the South Western Ghats. Pakistan J Parasitol. (2019) 2019:33–8.

Google Scholar

17. Kumar, A, and Chordia, N. In silico PCR primer designing and validation. Methods Mol Biol. (2015) 1275:143–51. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2365-6_10

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Hall, TA. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser. (1999)

Google Scholar

19. Newman, L, Duffus, A, and Lee, C. Using the free program MEGA to build phylogenetic trees from molecular data. Am Biol Teach. (2016) 78:608–12. doi: 10.1525/abt.2016.78.7.608

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Kaur, P, Qureshi, TA, and Shrivastav, R. Histo-architectural alterations induced by Euclinostomum heterostomum (metacercariae) infected liver of Channa punctata (Bloch). J Paras Dis. (2012) 36:197–9. doi: 10.1007/s12639-012-0102-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Shareef, PA, and Abidi, S. Incidence and histopathology of encysted progenetic metacercaria of Clinostomum complanatum (Digenea: Clinostomidae) in Channa punctatus and its development in experimental host. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. (2012) 2:421–6. doi: 10.1016/s2221-1691(12)60068-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Shareef, P, and Abidi, S. Cysteine protease is a major component in the excretory/secretory products of Euclinostomum heterostomum (Digenea: Clinostomidae). Parasitol Res. (2013) 113:65–71. doi: 10.1007/s00436-013-3627-5

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Shareef, P., Rizvi, A.T.F., Saifullah, M.B B.M S., and Abidi, S. (2010). “Preliminary analysis of in vitro released excretory/ secretory (E/S) cysteine proteases of the progenetic metacercariae of Clinostomum complanatum.” in XII International Congress of Parasitology (ICOPA).

Google Scholar

24. Kasny, M, Mikeš, L, Hampl, V, Dvořák, J, Caffrey, C, Dalton, J, et al. Chapter 4 peptidases of trematodes. Adv Parasitol. (2009) 69:205–97. doi: 10.1016/S0065-308X(09)69004-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Adeyemo, AO, and Agbede, SA. Histopathology of Tilapia tissues harbouring Clinostomum tilapiae parasites. Afr J Biomed Res. (2010) 11:115–118. doi: 10.4314/ajbr.v11i1.50677

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Prasanna, A, and Chikkam, V. Histopathology of heart of freshwater spiny eel, Mastacembelus armatus naturally infected with Tetracotyle Metacercaria (Trematoda: Strigeidae). Res J Parasitol. (2013) 8:45–54. doi: 10.3923/jp.2013.45.54

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Milbourne, EA, and Howell, MJ. Eosinophil differentiation in response to Fasciola hepatica and its excretory/secretory antigens. Int J Parasitol. (1993) 23:1005–9. doi: 10.1016/0020-7519(93)90120-N

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Akiyoshi, H, and Inoue, A. Comparative histological study of teleost livers in relation to phylogeny. Zool Sci. (2004) 21:841–50. doi: 10.2108/zsj.21.841

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Shinya, M, Misaka, N, Miyakoshi, Y, Takeuchi, K, and Kasahara, N. Effects of starvation on melano-macrophages in the kidney of masu salmon (Oncorhynchus masou). Aquaculture. (2002) 209:247–55. doi: 10.1016/S0044-8486(01)00716-5

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Agius, C, and Roberts, RJ. Melano-macrophage centres and their role in fish pathology. J Fish Dis. (2003) 26:499–509. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2761.2003.00485.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Roberts, T. Systematic review of the Mastacembelidae or spiny eels of Burma and Thailand, with description of two new species of Macrognathus. Jpn J Ichthyol. (1986) 33:95–109. doi: 10.1007/BF02905838

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Echi, P, Eyo, J, Okafor, F, Onyishi, G, and Ivoke, N. First record of co – infection of three Clinostomatid parasites in cichlids (Osteichthyes: Cichlidae) in a tropical freshwater Lake. Iran J Public Health. (2012) 41:86–90.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

33. Curran, S, Tkach, V, and Overstreet, R. A review of Polylekithum Arnold 1934 and its familial affinities using morphological and molecular data, with description of Polylekithum catahoulensis sp. nov. Acta Parasitol. (2006) 51:238–48. doi: 10.2478/s11686-006-0037-1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Lotfy, W, Brant, S, Ashmawy, K, Devkota, R, Mkoji, G, and Loker, E. A molecular approach for identification of paramphistomes from Africa and Asia. Vet Parasitol. (2010) 174:234–40. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.08.027

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Phalee, A, and Wongsawad, C. Prevalence of infection and molecular confirmation by using ITS-2 region of Fasciola gigantica found in domestic cattle from Chiang Mai province, Thailand. Asian Pac J Trop Med. (2014) 7:207–11. doi: 10.1016/S1995-7645(14)60022-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Calhoun, DM, Leslie, KL, Riepe, TB, Achatz, TJ, McDevitt-Galles, T, Tkach, VV, et al. Patterns of Clinostomum marginatum infection in fishes and amphibians: integration of field, genetic, and experimental approaches. J Helminthol. (2019) 94:e44. doi: 10.1017/s0022149x18001244

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Kaur, P, Qureshi, TA, and Shrivastav, R. Histopathological and Haematological investigations on Nandus nandus (ham.) parasitized by metacercariae of Clinostomum complanatum (Rudolphi, 1819). Int J Environ Sci. (2012) 2:1324–30. doi: 10.6088/ijes.00202030019

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: aquaculture, digenean trematode, ITS, pathology, Thailand

Citation: Islam SI, Rodkhum C and Taweethavonsawat P (2023) Pathological effects due to metacercariae of Clinostomum piscidium migration in snakeskin gourami (Trichopodus pectoralis) in Thailand. Front. Vet. Sci. 10:1177218. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1177218

Received: 01 March 2023; Accepted: 17 April 2023;
Published: 02 May 2023.

Edited by:

Patrick Mathews Delgado, University of São Paulo, Brazil

Reviewed by:

Ishtiyaq Ahmad, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, India
Igor Hamoy, Federal Rural University of the Amazon, Brazil

Copyright © 2023 Islam, Rodchum and Taweethavonsawat. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Piyanan Taweethavonsawat, Piyanan.T@Chula.ac.th

Download