Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Vet. Sci., 05 December 2023
Sec. Animal Nutrition and Metabolism
Volume 10 - 2023 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2023.1335007

Editorial: Efforts to reduce feed-food competition

  • 1Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
  • 2Department of Life Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
  • 3Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
  • 4Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences, University of Milan, Lodi, Italy
  • 5Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment (Di3A), University of Catania, Catania, Italy

Editorial on the Research Topic
Efforts to reduce feed-food competition

Livestock is facing numerous challenges concerning safety and security, climate change and environmental emissions, and public opinion about animal welfare and sustainability. Moreover, fluctuations in the international market economy due to the recent conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East drive the whole chain of production toward a necessary increase in sustainability and circularity.

Feed-food competition has been defined as “the tensions and trade-offs between using edible crops and other resources to either feed people directly or feed livestock” (1). Increasing the recovery of critical raw materials is one of the key challenges in the transition to a more circular and resilient economy. In this scenario, feed-food competition is gaining attention, and researchers agree that alternatives to unsustainable feed ingredients need to be explored.

The main objective of the Research Topic was to collect data focused on reducing feed-food competition in a trans-disciplinary approach. In this Research Topic, five scientific articles have been published.

Insects are now recognized worldwide as a sustainable feed ingredient because they can utilize organic waste as a substrate for breeding, and the meal produced from them has been demonstrated to be an effective replacement for both soybean and fish meal. In their review, Belhadj Slimen et al. provided an overview of the use of the most studied insect species in poultry feed, focusing on nutritional value and digestibility, effects on live performance, product quality and health. Concerns about their safe use as feed ingredients have been addressed as well. Even if insects are acknowledged as a valuable source of proteins, MUFA, PUFA, minerals, and vitamins in feeds for poultry, authors recognize the need for a reduction of production costs and for strict control of contamination and spreading of pathogens. Nonetheless, more research on the role of antimicrobial peptides in association with chitin and chitosan should be performed to deepen the knowledge about their antimicrobial potentialities.

The study proposed by Bongiorno et al. explores the possibility of using live black soldier fly larvae as environmental enrichment in medium-growing chickens and their effects on in vivo, blood parameters, and slaughter performance. In this experiment, 240 male and female Label Naked Neck birds (21 days of age) were allotted to four experimental groups, according to sex and diet, and reared following European rules for organic farming (2). The results showed benefits deriving from the live larvae administration on in vivo performance more evident in early phases and in males compared to females. An interesting result has been achieved in gamma-glutamyl transferase concentration in the blood resulting in lower (P < 0.05) in supplemented groups compared to controls; authors indicate the chitin content of the larvae as possibly responsible for this positive outcome. Bursa of Fabricious and spleen resulted bigger in treated animals, suggesting a positive effect on immune functions.

Natural feed additives able to improve performance and feed utilization can represent an alternative to reduce feed food competition. In the study presented by Liu et al., Ganoderma lingzhi culture, a medicinal fungus, has been used as fermented feed for Sanhuang broilers; the aim was to explore its impact on growth performance, serum biochemical profile, meat quality, intestinal morphology, and gut health. A total of 192 chickens were allocated in the four experimental groups (112 days old, six replicates per group with eight broilers/pen). Authors recorded better performance in terms of FCR at the end of the trial, an increase in SOD and HDL serum levels and improved SCFA caecal concentrations. Accordingly, a higher diversity resulted from microbiota analyses, with a higher number of SCFAs-generating bacteria in the gut. It appears that the administration of fermented feed could positively affect the slow-growing chicken livestock system posing a new basis for developing biological feeds based on medicinal fungi fermentation.

As already stated, in recent years, many factors affected the availability of commonly used raw materials in animal nutrition. One of these cases is represented by fishmeal. Overfishing, climatic changes, and economic issues caused a worldwide systemic decline in fish meal availability. This pushed aquaculture to search for new and more sustainable feed ingredients. Lin et al. published a study aimed at substituting fish meal with corn gluten meal, a by-product of maize processing, for pacific white shrimp nutrition. In their experimental design corn gluten meal was included in six dietary groups up to 60% (0%, 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, and 60%) replacing fish meals, which were decreased from 300 g*kg−1 in the 0% group to 120 g*kg−1 in the 60% group. The authors analyzed growth, feed utilization, enzymatic activity, and nutrient digestibility in juvenile subjects. The higher replacement rate negatively affected the shrimp performance; the authors attribute these effects to a disbalance in amino acids of the feed. Interestingly, based on broken line regression analysis an optimal dietary corn gluten meal replacement was found at 27.47% of the total protein derived from fish meal.

Of the proposed solutions to face feed food competition, the use of former foods (FF) in animal feed constitutes a new area of research (1). FFs are “foodstuffs, […] manufactured for human consumption in full compliance with the EU food law, but which are no longer intended for human consumption […] and which do not present any health risks when used as feed” (3), Research proposed by Vastolo et al. investigated the nutritional characteristics of four different types of pasta to be included in pig diets. The authors analyzed the chemical composition and digestibility of pasta comparing the value obtained with barley as reference material. All the analyzed types of pasta (wholemeal, semolina, purple, and tricolor) resulted in higher protein and energy content (P < 0.001) and lower protein (P < 0.001) compared to barley. All the tested products showed higher values of resistant starch compared to barley, which was mainly composed of slowly digestible starch. The authors stated that the examined FFs seem suitable for swine nutrition, but the different starch digestibility should be considered.

In summary, the presented research articles present new insights for the further development of a more sustainable livestock system, able to reduce the feed food competition and face the growing interest of new consumers.

Author contributions

CF: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. DL: Writing – original draft. MT: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. DP: Writing – original draft. AN: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This Research Topic derives from a cooperation of the Universities within the PRIN2020 Project “Live-Haze—Hazelnut industrial by-product inclusion in livestock chains in Italy” funded by the Italian Ministry of University and Research (Protocol 2020244EWW).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Breewood H, Garnett T. What is Feed-food Competition? (Foodsource: building blocks). Oxford: Food Climate Research Network, University of Oxford (2020).

Google Scholar

2. European Commission. Commission Regulation (EC) N° 889/2008 of 5 September 2008 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 on organic production and labelling of organic products with regard to organic production, labelling and control. Off J Eur Union. (2008) 250:1–84.

Google Scholar

3. Regulation (EU) No 2017/1017 of 15 June 2017 Amending Regulation (EU) No 68/2013 on the Catalogue of Feed Materials. Available online at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32017R1017 (accessed November 3, 2023).

Google Scholar

Keywords: sustainability, circular economy, livestock, former foodstuff, insects, fermented feed

Citation: Forte C, Lo Fiego DP, Trabalza Marinucci M, Pravettoni D and Natalello A (2023) Editorial: Efforts to reduce feed-food competition. Front. Vet. Sci. 10:1335007. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1335007

Received: 08 November 2023; Accepted: 21 November 2023;
Published: 05 December 2023.

Edited and reviewed by: Domenico Bergero, University of Turin, Italy

Copyright © 2023 Forte, Lo Fiego, Trabalza Marinucci, Pravettoni and Natalello. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Claudio Forte, claudio.forte@unito.it

Download