Prevalence of Mycobacterium bovis in deer in mainland China: a systematic review and meta-analysis

1 Introduction

Deer tuberculosis (Deer TB) is a chronic bacterial disease caused by Mycobacterium bovis (1), which is mainly manifested in the formation of tuberculous nodular granulomas comprising necrotic foci and abscesses (2). Deer tuberculosis is an important zoonotic infectious disease, which not only affects deer breeding, but also threatens public health security (3). According to the global tuberculosis report released by the WHO in 2020, Mycobacterium bovis is the most common cause of bovine tuberculosis and zoonotic tuberculosis worldwide (4). At present, the transmission of bovine TB among deer mainly occurs by indirect oral transmission between cattle and deer (5); host transmission systems of common cattle-deer-wild boar in Europe (6); a rat-deer transmission system in New Zealand; and kinship transmission between individuals in the same population (7).

Domesticated deer are important economic animals in several regions, including Asia (5). In recent years, with the increase in deer breeding density and the frequent domestic and foreign trade, once bovine TB occurs, it will spread widely, posing a threat to the health of deer and humans (3). At the same time, the homogeneous distribution of TB-infected wild deer and TB cattle has deprived many European countries (e.g., Italy, Portugal, and Spain) of the opportunity to obtain official tuberculosis-free (OTF) status (6). Many developed countries have implemented effective control and eradication strategies, and strict food safety standards for zoonotic TB caused by M. bovis, while in developing countries and economically less developed regions, zoonotic TB caused by M. bovis might have higher actual infection rates and cause more severe economic losses in human and animal populations than the available data suggests (8). To date, China has introduced a series of policies and assistance funds to encourage and support intensive farming, at the same time, the awareness of farmers regarding the prevention and control of deer TB was strengthened, and disease eradication programs were implemented on farms (9).

Some articles have reported the epidemic situation of deer TB in certain areas of China; however, these studies are fragmentary and cannot explain the epidemic status and influencing factors of deer TB in mainland China. In addition, as far as we know, there is no national summary report on the prevalence of deer TB in mainland China, and no article on the systematic evaluation of deer TB has been published. Therefore, in this study, we summarized cross-sectional studies on deer TB in mainland China from 1981 to December, 2023 and conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the overall prevalence of deer TB in mainland China during this period. We also analyzed various risk factors that affect deer TB prevalence (climate, altitude, annual average sunshine radiation, annual average precipitation, annual temperature, average temperature, geographical distribution, age, species, and detection techniques). The data are intended to assist in assessing the prevalence of deer TB, and to assess the potential risk factors for M. bovis infection in deer in mainland China. Our analysis also provides a basis for developing future rational disease control strategies and the accurate assessment of the association between the economy, health, and disease prevalence.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Article retrieval strategy

The study was conducted according to the PRISMA (2020) Checklist item (Supplementary Table S1) (10). The languages were restricted to English and Chinese. We searched PubMed, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, Chinese Web of Knowledge (CNKI), WanFang, and Chongqing VIP databases for studies reporting bovine tuberculosis (bTB) infection in deer in mainland China from1981 to December 25, 2023.

We established retrieval formulas based on the retrieval patterns of six databases, and to obtain more comprehensive research data, we also conducted supplementary searches (Supplemental searches increase the number of duplicates, but our review of all included articles began with duplicate exclusion) (Supplementary Table S3), with no time limit for the publication in the searched journals, and included synonym extensions in search processes. When we conduct a full-text review of articles that met the inclusion criteria, we also reviewed each reference one by one to identify other studies that were not found during the database search process. We did not attempt to verify unpublished reports.

2.1.1 Inclusion criteria

1. A cross-sectional study in which the study species was deer and the study site was in mainland China where the pathogen was Mycobacterium bovis (3, 11–29);

2. Randomized trial: Including an epidemiological survey of deer tuberculosis in a certain area (11, 12, 14, 16, 17, 22, 24, 27, 29); method establishment and method comparative study (13, 15, 18–21, 23, 25, 26, 28); research paper (3);

3. Studies that can be obtained in full text and downloaded (3, 11–29);

4. Studies of natural infection with the disease (3, 11–29);

5. Studies with a total sample size greater than 30 (3, 11–29);

6. Studies that provide sample information (including sampling time, location, breed, age, sex, testing methods, etc.) (3, 11–29).

2.1.2 Exclusion criteria

1. Duplicate articles (n = 1890);

2. Cross-over trials (n = 323) and Treatment research program (n = 343); nonoriginal studies, including Reviews (n = 342), Letters (n = 17), Proceedings of a meeting (n = 544), Books or guides (n = 405), Non-disease studies (genes, proteins, etc.) (n = 443), Studies with suspected diseases or entry quarantine diseases (n = 14).

3. Data duplication studies (n = 10);

4. Studies with conflicting data on article content (n = 2);

5. Studies with comments but no data (n = 8);

6. Studies in which the samples in the data are only positive samples (n = 4);

7. Non-epidemiological survey articles (Studies with suspected diseases or entry quarantine diseases) (n = 6);

8. Unable to download (n = 1);

9. Sample size<30 (n = 28) (Figure 1).

Figure 1

Figure 1. Flow diagram of eligible studies for searching and selecting. The inclusion and exclusion criteria only to this study.

Our study was a single rate meta-analysis and did not have a test group or control group, and therefore did not group the included studies.

2.2 Literature screening

Endnote (Clarivate, London, UK) was used for the statistical collation of the retrieved articles. Four authors (DNL, XYL, YHS and YXJ) independently reviewed all retrieved articles, firstly by comparing titles, author information and abstracts to exclude duplicate studies; secondly by reviewing titles and abstracts to exclude articles that did not meet the criteria for this study (e.g., studies of tuberculosis in non-Chinese mainland deer, reports of conferences, case reports, etc.); and lastly by downloading the full text of the included articles and reading the full-text content carefully, and further excluded studies that did not meet the inclusion criteria based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and all the studies that met the criteria were cross-sectional studies (Figure 1).

2.3 Data extraction

The data were extracted into Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA, United States). Data from each study were independently extracted by authors DNL XYL and DL. During the data extraction process, any opinions and uncertainties in the data extraction were discussed with the main author of this study (DL), and the data were extracted based on the discussion results. We extracted nine data items from each study (Sampling years, Province (Region), Variety, Detection method, Breeding mode, Season, Gender, Age, Score applied to this study) (30–32). At the same time, we obtained data on altitude, climate, annual rainfall, annual average temperature, and annual maximum sunshine hours based on the sampling time and location of each research data (data source: CMDC). The effect measures extracted for each study were the number of positives, the total sample size and the positivity rate.

2.4 Quality assessment

We evaluated the quality of the included studies based on the GRADE method (33). Authors (D-NL, X-YL, and DL) scored each study during independent extraction of data from each study based on whether the study had a clear detection method, whether it had a clear sampling year, whether it had randomized sampling, whether it had a clear method of sample collection, and the presence of four or more risk factors (Supplementary Table S4), which were ultimately used to evaluate the risk of bias of the included studies. According to the scoring criteria, the articles included in the study were awarded 0–5 points (Table 1). A score of 4–5 was considered a high-quality article; 0–1 points indicated a low-quality article (32) (The scoring criteria are only applicable to this meta-analysis and do not serve as a quality assessment of the original study).

Table 1

Table 1. Included studies of tuberculosis in deer in mainland China.

2.5 Statistical analysis

The extracted data were analyzed using the R program, using the “meta” data package to estimate the model (31, 34, 35). The positive rates of various studies were subjected to Poisson-Lognormal (PLN) analysis and the combined effects were estimated using a meta-analysis package (Table 2). Cochran’s Q-statistic was used to analyze heterogeneity, while Higgin’s statistic analyzed the differences in heterogeneity (I² > 50% heterogeneity was considered significant) (36, 37). By analyzing the forest map, the estimated values included in the study data were summarized and the sources of heterogeneity were shown. Based on the estimated heterogeneity, we selected the random-effects model (RE Model) for overall effect estimation and subgroup analysis. To further determine publication bias or small data volume bias, we analyzed funnel plots (symmetry) and used Egger’s test; and used the trim and fill analysis method for verification and sensitivity analysis. To further analyze the potential sources of heterogeneity, we conducted subgroup and meta regression analysis. We analyzed and evaluated subgroups such as regional location, province, sampling time, positive diagnosis method, sampling season, feeding mode, and age in the research data (Table 3). To further analyze and evaluate the potential sources of heterogeneity, we also conducted an analysis and evaluation of geographical factor subgroups, including longitude and latitude, and annual average temperature (Table 4). The code used for R program statistical analysis is shown in Supplementary Table S5.

Table 2

Table 2. Normal distribution test for the normal rate and the different conversion of the normal rate.

Table 3

Table 3. Pooled prevalence of tuberculosis in deer in mainland China.

Table 4

Table 4. Geographical factors prevalence of tuberculosis in deer in mainland China.

3 Results

3.1 Research inclusion results

The literature retrieval strategy retrieved 4,400 studies (Figure 1), and then we selected 20 eligible studies through established inclusion and exclusion criteria. For each of the 20 (3, 11–29) studies eligible for inclusion, the three authors (DNL, XYL and DL) independently extracted data for each of the nine data items (Sampling years, Province (Region), Variety, Detection method, Breeding mode, Season, Gender, Age, Score applied to this study) (Table 1). Based on the quality scoring criteria, the 20 studies were categorized as, 10 medium quality and 10 high quality.

3.2 Publication bias and sensitivity analysis

We performed PLN conversion on the positive rate to ensure that the combined effect size data was closer to a normal distribution (Table 2), and the results showed high heterogeneity in the included studies (I² = 100%, p = 0; Figure 2). A funnel plot can qualitatively identify publication bias, and the asymmetry of the scatter distribution indicated the existence of publication bias and/or small sample size bias in the study (Figure 3). The Egger linear regression method further validated the existence of publication bias (p < 0.001; Figure 4; Supplementary Table S6). To confirm the reliability of the results, sensitivity analysis showed that the results remained unchanged when any study was removed from the analysis (Figure 5). This further proved that the meta-analysis was reliable. The trim and filling analysis showed that after the scatter distribution was symmetrical, the estimated value of the overall effect size did not change significantly, thus the effect of publication bias on the results was not obvious (Figure 6).

Figure 2

Figure 2. Forest plot of prevalence of tuberculosis in deer amongst studies conducted in mainland China.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Funnel plot with pseudo 95% confidence interval limits for the examination of publication bias.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Egger’s test for publication bias.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Sensitivity analysis.

Figure 6

Figure 6. Funnel plot with trim and fill analysis of the publication bias.

3.3 Meta-analysis of tuberculosis in deer in mainland China

There were differences in the prevalence among different breeding locations in mainland China (all prevalence are the combined values from 1981 to 2023). Analysis of each subgroup showed that the prevalence was highest in Central China (17.5, 95% confidence interval (CI):14.0–21.9; 63/362) and lowest in Eastern China (4.7, 95% CI:2.4–9.3; 8/170; Table 3). At the province level, the prevalence was highest in Heilongjiang province (26.5, 95% CI:13.2–53.0; 1557/4291), and lowest in Qinghai province (4.3, 95% CI:1.8–10.1; 5/117; Table 5).

Table 5

Table 5. Estimated pooled of tuberculosis by provincial regions in deer in mainland China.

Subgroup analysis showed that sampling time, breed, positive rate detection method, breeding pattern, season, and age of deer were the factors that affected the prevalence of TB. Among them, the prevalence after 2000 (14.5, 95%CI:9.9–21.2; 371/2430) was higher than that before 2000 (13.4, 95%CI:5.4–33.3; 1795/8583). Elaphurus davidianus was the most susceptible species, with a prevalence of 35.3% (95% CI:18.5–67.2; 6/17), followed by Cervus nippon 14.5% (95% CI:5.6–37.1; 2160/13358). The subgroup of disease detection methods includes common detection methods for bTB, namely the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), indocyanine green angiography (ICG), the interferon gamma release assay (IGRA), the indirect hemagglutination (IHA) test, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), the protein energy malnutrition (PEM) test, and the single intradermal cervical tuberculin test (SICT). Among them, the PEM detection method indicated the highest prevalence (21.7, 95% CI:15.4–30.4; 2802/7226). The prevalence of tuberculosis in free-range deer (25.9, 95% CI:4.7–100.0; 73/170) was higher than that in captive deer (15.3, 95% CI:10.0–23.4; 5294/22045). In the seasonal subgroup analysis, the prevalence was highest in winter to spring (28.9 95% CI:12.2–68.5; 63/224). In the age subgroup analysis, the prevalence of tuberculosis in breeding deer was the highest (17.8, 95% CI:13.9–21.7; 195/1068). Articles with a quality score of 2–3 indicated the highest prevalence (18.1, 95% CI:10.7–30.8; 4621/17798; Table 3).

In the geographical subgroup analysis, the prevalence was highest in the region with a latitude of 40–45° (15.0, 95% CI:5.1–28.9; 1848/9260), longitude 120–125° (15.5, 95% CI:0.0–59.2; 1160/2465), and at altitudes of 0 $–$150 m (17.2, 95% CI:0.0–73.2; 1085/1455). The study on the influence of average annual temperature at sampling sites found that the prevalence was highest when the average temperature was 5–10°C (12.1, 95% CI:8.7–15.8; 718/6930; Table 4).

4 Discussion

The spread of deer tuberculosis has seriously restricted the development of deer industry. To understand, prevent and control the spread and prevalence of deer tuberculosis, it is essential to identify and control risk factors. The meta-analysis of deer tuberculosis showed that the average prevalence of tuberculosis in deer in mainland China between 1981 and 2023 was 16.1% (95% CI:10.5–24.6; 5367/22215), which was lower than that in free-range deer herds in southern Spain (18.5%, 2008) (38, 39), and higher than that in New Zealand (0.18%) (40), Italy (0.19%) (41), and Minnesota, United States (0.25%) (42). This reflects the fact that the control of deer TB in mainland China remains a huge challenge. There is no official vaccine to control deer TB; therefore, countries around the world mainly use the “quarantine-cull” approach to control TB in other animals, which is difficult to achieve for wild deer herds (43). Therefore, many developed countries have introduced policies related to deer TB, and in countries such as Australia and the United States, herding measures and targeted programs have been mainly implemented to control deer TB (44). New Zealand has introduced a program for the diagnosis and slaughter of TB-infected deer, comprising laboratory testing of suspect animals, necropsy of slaughtered animals, and ongoing surveillance of all carriers, under which all infected animals can be dynamically controlled, which reduced the prevalence of approximately 1.5% in 2004 to less than 0.2% by 2012, the prevalence of deer TB was further reduced to 0.18% by the end of 2013 (40, 45). In 2012, China issued the “Standard for Prevention and Control of Tuberculosis and Brucellosis in Deer,” which stipulates the management requirements, quarantine, immunization, disease reporting, and treatment of sick deer and pens to prevent the transmission of tuberculosis and brucellosis in deer (46). Considering the above successful control experience of deer TB in the United States and Canada, China could also consider long-term continuous surveillance of suspected infected deer and pay special attention to their isolation from cattle.

In the subgroup of breeding model, the prevalence was significantly higher in free range deer (25.9, 95% CI:4.7–100.0; 73/170) than in captive deer (15.3, 95% CI:10.0–23.4; 5294/22045), which is caused by many factors, such as population size, transmission by other susceptible animals in the vicinity, and the environment and morphological structure of the stocking area (47, 48). Observations of infected free-range deer in New Zealand showed a significant reduction in the prevalence of deer TB following control of TB-infected possums, suggesting that deer might be a frequent spillover host for possum infection (48). In Switzerland, the disease has been eradicated from free-range deer because of the successful reduction in the prevalence of TB in cattle (49). Ingestion of contaminated feed or water might play an important role in transmission of M. bovis among animals. Indeed, M. bovis infections frequently occur via the oral route (50). Therefore, free-range deer exposed to an M. bovis-contaminated environment for a longer period are more likely to come into contact with infected possums or cattle, with a greater chance of infection. To reduce the spread of deer TB in concentrated breeding areas, some regions have issued prevention and control guidelines (3). Since China’s accession to the World Trade Organization, the awareness of breeding management and deer breeding protection among breeders has gradually increased, making China’s deer breeding industry more standardized (43). Implementing scientific breeding techniques is an important guarantee to promote the healthy development of the deer breeding industry and is an important means to improve economic efficiency. Overall, the intensive breeding model still has shortcomings. Therefore, we recommend that when developing large-scale intensive deer farming, standardizing breeding management, improving the environment of the livestock sheds, and improving animal welfare, might produce better prevention and control effects (51).

Analysis showed that in the age subgroups, the prevalence of TB in young deer (13.4, 95% CI:10.5–16.3; 72/529) was lower than that in older deer, which might be related to the consciousness of breeders to strengthen the feeding management of young deer. Many deer farms have adopted the preventive measures of disinfecting and isolating fawns immediately after birth, and artificially nursing and raising healthy fawns, which effectively controls the transmission of TB to fawns and lays a good foundation for the elimination of TB from deer herds (52). In this study, the highest prevalence was found in breeding deer (17.8, 95% CI:13.9–21.7; 195/1068) and the lowest in adult deer (9.5, 95% CI:2.7–16.4; 275/2101), which is inconsistent with previous studies showing that the prevalence of infection increases with age (30). The reason for this might be that most of the studies on the disease in breeding deer and young deer in the articles screened for this study were from areas with a high prevalence of deer TB, such as Liaoning province (20.8, 95% CI:1.0–100.0; 1203/4656) and Jilin province (13.2, 95% CI:6.9–25.3; 880/8423).

The analysis results showed that in the seasonal subgroups, the prevalence in winter to spring (28.9, 95% CI:12.2–68.5; 63/224) was significantly higher than that in summer to autumn (7.5, 95% CI:3.6–15.6; 317/5069). Deer are climate-sensitive ungulates (53), and temperature changes during the spring and winter seasons might be the main reason for the high prevalence. This result was further analyzed in the context of geographical factors: The spring and winter seasons are colder in the Northeastern part of China, and studies have shown that the growth and reproduction of northern deer species are closely related to summer nutrition; for example, the population dynamics of moose are influenced by the availability of nitrogen in summer food (54). In addition, researchers generally agree that winter nutrition limits the growth of ungulates (55). Klein’s theory suggests that the feeding status of large herbivores in spring and summer largely influences their growth, body weight, and sustained fecundity in autumn (56). Related studies have fleshed out Klein’s theory, showing that breeding animals take in more food in the summer and autumn to increase their internal storage capacity (57). This feeding behavior is mainly used to increase protein storage to cope with the severe winter cold period. Protein is an important nutrient for animal survival and reproduction, and deer in summer and autumn have high protein storage capacities and are more resistant to disease; therefore, this might be one of the reasons for the low prevalence of TB in deer in summer and autumn (58). This viewpoint is also supported by the analysis of the annual temperature subgroups. TB prevalence correlated positively with temperature rises below 10°C, and negatively with temperature rises above 10°C, with the highest prevalence occurring over an average temperature between 5 to 10°C (12.1, 95% CI:8.7–5.8; 718/6930). M. bovis does not readily survive in hot and dry environments (59). Therefore, we speculated that a temperature of 5$–$10°C might promote the survival or transmission of M. bovis in deer. In the humidity subgroup analysis, deer raised in a humidity of 70–85% had the highest prevalence of TB (10.9, 95% CI,5.1–18.5125/706), which is consistent with the trend in the meta-analysis of dairy cattle TB (31); therefore, we speculated that a humid environment also favors TB spread. The sample size in the winter to spring (number of studies: 224) group was much smaller than that in the summer and autumn (number of studies:5069) group; therefore, the research effect is small. Further research is needed to investigate the relationship between the two.

In the regional subgroup analysis, during the study period, the prevalence of deer tuberculosis in Central China (17.5, 95% CI:14.0–21.9; 63/362) was higher than that in the other regions, followed by Northeast China (16.2, 95% CI:8.3–31.6; 3640/17370). The latitude and longitude subgroups showed the highest prevalence in the longitude range 120–125° (15.5, 95% CI:0.0–59.2; 1160/2465) and latitude range 40–45°(15.0, 95% CI:5.1–28.9; 1848/9260). Latitude was significantly associated with seasonal peaks of TB: the greater the latitude, the greater the magnitude of the seasonal peaks (60, 61). Different latitudes result in different winter temperatures and sunlight UV levels. Northeast China is a region with high latitude, and in the spring and winter, the short daylight time and large temperature difference between day and night, will reduce the time deer spend outdoors in deer farms, thus decreasing the opportunity for deer to supplement vitamin D through sunlight. While skin exposure to solar UV radiation is the main source of vitamin D, another small portion comes from dietary intake (62). A positive correlation between the severity of tuberculosis in deer and the concentration of vitamin D was found in the serum of M. bovis-infected animals (63), and this vitamin enhances the ability of macrophages to kill mycobacteria (64).

In the province subgroup analysis, the highest prevalence of deer TB was found in Heilongjiang province (26.5, 95% CI:13.2–53.0; 1557/4291), followed by Liaoning province (20.8, 95% CI:1.0–100.0; 1203/4656), which corresponds to the high prevalence of deer tuberculosis in northeast China. This is probably caused by the temperate monsoon climate in northeastern China, which is characterized by simultaneous rain and heat, a dense network of rivers, sufficient water supply, fertile soil, and high vegetation cover in the black soil area, which can provide sufficient food and water for deer. Moreover, the northeastern region is sparsely populated, so it is very favorable for deer breeding (65). Since the beginning of this century, because of the financial crisis and other reasons, China’s deer breeding industry has been in a downturn. The slaughter volume around the rapid rise of TB, and the high rate of culling sick deer, have played a role in the control of tuberculosis, and since 2008, it has been influenced by the national policy of supporting the breeding industry and the rise of international antler prices, consequently, the volume of deer breeding in the northeast has grown significantly; however, the development of quarantine work for TB is slow, and the contradiction between the two is an important reason for the increased prevalence of deer TB in Northeast China (52), and has contributed to the high prevalence of the disease (2006, 64/563; 2010,210/1086) (52, 66). Field research by the China Animal Husbandry Association Deer Branch in Jilin province, Heilongjiang province and other places concluded that the local government of Heilongjiang Province needs to further increase its emphasis on deer breeding and scientific research, and increase funding and policy support to establish breeding standards and feed nutrition standards to meet the needs of high-level development of deer factories (67). However, there were few studies in multiple provinces included in the present meta-analysis, which might have affected the stability of the results. Therefore, we suggest that the relevant departments of provinces and cities should strengthen the monitoring of deer TB to clarify the regional differences in deer TB in mainland China. In the meta-analyses of deer TB prevalence, the different assays used were the main source of heterogeneity. The 20 studies included in the meta-analysis used seven methods (SICT, ELISA, IGRA, IHA, PEM, PCR, and ICG) to detect the prevalence of deer tuberculosis. In the detection methods subgroup analysis, PEM indicated the highest prevalence (21.0, 95% CI:15.4–30.4; 2802/7226), followed by ELISA (15.8, 95% CI:5.6–44.5; 2203/10347), which was the most commonly used method (7/22; Table 3). ELISA is simple to master, has good sensitivity, allows objective results judgment, and has been widely used in clinical diagnosis (68). IHA had the lowest detection rate (4.3, 95% CI:3.7–5.1; 156/3601). The advantages of this method are simple equipment, easy operation, and easy determination of results; however, it is not stable enough and the judgment of results is easily influenced by subjective factors (69). The PCR assay has the advantages of rapidity, sensitivity, and specificity compared with traditional assays, and is particularly suitable to detect slow-growing, difficult-to-culture pathogens. PCR assays can be used not only for the amplification of genomic DNA, but also for the rapid detection of trace amounts of Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA directly from histopathology and other samples to indicate the presence of pathogens, greatly reducing the time taken to detect M. tuberculosis (70, 71). M. tuberculosis IGRA (TB-IGRA) is an in vitro immunological method recommended by WHO to diagnose M. tuberculosis infection, and China added TB-IGRA to the industry standard for tuberculosis diagnosis (WS 288–2017) in 2017 (72). TB-IGRA detects tuberculosis mainly using the proteins encoded by the RD1 and RD16 regions of M. tuberculosis, which have good specificity (73); however, their sensitivity is limited (71, 74). At present, the detection of tuberculosis in mainland China mainly uses the bovine Mycobacterium purified protein derivative (PPD) method for the SICT, and the positive animals detected are isolated or eliminated. Although SICT is less specific, it has high sensitivity, and universal detection of the whole deer herd using SICT is beneficial for the early detection of TB infection in areas where TB is endemic. However, in areas where TB is controlled or shows stable control, SICT alone tends to produce more nonspecific interference, which is not conducive to tuberculosis purification (75). The prevalence of deer tuberculosis varies in different regions, environments, and conditions of deer breeding in mainland China; therefore, the detection and diagnosis methods should be selected and applied according to local conditions. In areas with a high prevalence of deer tuberculosis [such as Heilongjiang province (26.5, 95% CI:13.2–53.0; 1557/4291)], sensitive, simple, and low-cost testing methods should be used to achieve rapid diagnosis, timely isolation, treatment, and elimination of diseased animals, to allow quick and efficient control of the epidemic. In areas with low prevalence, such as Qinghai province (4.3, 95% CI:1.8–10.1; 5/117), multiple testing and diagnostic methods should be adopted to eliminate latent diseased animals, reduce the risk factors of epidemic outbreaks, and reduce unnecessary economic losses. At the same time, it is particularly important for researchers to develop more accurate, convenient and cheaper detection and diagnosis methods to prevent and control deer TB. Combining data concerning the occurrence and development of the disease and the actual local situation, would make rapid screening of diseased animals an effective means to reduce the prevalence of deer TB.

This study is the first to analyze the prevalence of tuberculosis in deer in mainland China. The sample range of the study is wide and the method was rigorous, including a comprehensive analysis of various influencing factors, thus providing an effective reference for the prevention and control of tuberculosis in deer in mainland China. However, some limiting factors might make some of the results of this meta-analysis unstable. There were few articles examining deer TB, although we used several different search formats based on six databases to retrieve more eligible studies. However, only 20 articles ultimately met our screening criteria. This left the analysis under-powered for certain subgroups and might have led to inconsistent results.

5 Conclusion

Our research showed that deer tuberculosis is widespread in mainland China (16.1,95% CI:10.5–24.6; 5367/22215; 1981 to 2023). Geographical distribution, seasons, and detection methods are factors affecting the assessment of the prevalence of deer tuberculosis. Based on the results of our study on the epidemic factors of deer TB in mainland China, we recommend the establishment of scientific breeding bases, scientific feeding programs, strengthening technical training, increasing the attention of regulatory authorities to deer breeding research, and improving deer feeding and disease diagnostic techniques according to different local feeding methods, geographical factors, and climatic conditions. This is especially important in the northeast region, where breeding is concentrated. In addition, deer tuberculosis control and epidemic prevention systems should be established in all breeding areas. Researchers should carry out epidemiological investigations in more breeding areas to further refine the risk factors for deer tuberculosis epidemics, with the aim of providing a solid foundation for the prevention and control of deer tuberculosis in mainland China.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Author contributions

DL: Investigation, Software, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft. D-NL: Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing. X-YL: Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing. Y-HS: Data curation, Writing – review & editing. X-TL: Formal analysis, Software, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. SS: Supervision, Writing – review & editing. Y-XJ: Writing – review & editing. YZ: Funding acquisition, Resources, Writing – review & editing. J-ML: Writing – review & editing. KS: Writing – review & editing. XL: Writing – review & editing. FL: Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. N-CD: Writing – review & editing. F-LZ: Conceptualization, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing, Funding acquisition. Q-LG: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. RD: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Resources, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This study was supported by the Scientific and Technology Development Plan Project of the Jilin Province (20220304003YY), Innovative and Entrepreneurial Talents of Jilin Provincial Department of Human Resources and Social Security (2023DJ07), and Jilin Provincial Department of Education Science and Technology Research Project (JJKH20230410KJ).

Acknowledgments

We thank the scientists and personnel of the Laboratory of Production and Product Application of Sika Deer of Jilin Province, Jilin Agricultural University, for their collaboration.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2024.1333975/full#supplementary-material

References

1. World Organization for Animal Health (2024) (WOAH) Article 1.3.1. Available at: https://www.woah.org/en/what-we-do/animal-health-and-welfare/animal-diseases/

Google Scholar

2. Zhai, J, Su, FY, and Zhang, AW. Research progress in molecular diagnosis of deer tuberculosis. HL Anim Sci Vet Med. (2017):89–91. doi: 10.13881/j.cnki.hljxmsy.2017.0131

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Zhang, XX. Epidemiological investigation of tuberculosis in sika deer and development of immunization program in Jilin Province. In: MA thesis. Jilin (Changchun): Jilin Agricultural University (2023).

Google Scholar

4. World Health Organization. (2020). Global tuberculosis report. [Accessed May 15, 2023]. Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/336069.

Google Scholar

5. Thacker, TC, Palmer, MV, Robbe-Austerman, S, and Stuber, TP. Anatomical distribution of Mycobacterium bovis genotypes in experimentally infected white-tailed deer. Vet Microbiol. (2015) 180:75–81. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2015.07.006

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Hardstaff, JL, Marion, G, Hutchings, MR, and White, PC. Evaluating the tuberculosis hazard posed to cattle from wildlife across Europe. Res Vet Sci. (2013) 97:S86–93. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2013.12.002

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Blanchong, JA, Scribner, KT, Kravchenko, AN, and Winterstein, SR. TB-infected deer are more closely related than non-infected deer. Biol Lett. (2006) 3:104–6. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2006.0547

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Luciano, SA, and Roess, A. Human zoonotic tuberculosis and livestock exposure in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review identifying challenges in laboratory diagnosis. J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health. (2020) 67:97–111. doi: 10.1111/zph.12684

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Zhang, Y. M. (2016). The breeding and culture of reindeer. China's animal husbandry industry 21, 85–86. Available at: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=p7sfyaWOx3NR51V7GOELEUSltuY2A1Vf2PyCxZg1ZgfzAXbalkRvvaz7PqcFbwpuLM9zv8MWLvfph2-A1_1m06NwBrPuYd54rlyq_Ex8WIU9VkR27FcbhMAS_uiGJIIE35nMGBvES9aMvLj6J9J7uQ==&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS

Google Scholar

10. Page, MJ, McKenzie, JE, Bossuyt, PM, Boutron, I, Hoffmann, TC, Mulrow, CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. (2021) 372:n71. Published 2021 Mar 29. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Chen, Y, Yan, Y, Gao, Y, Li, Y, Zhang, K, Zhou, M, et al. An outbreak of tuberculosis in endangered northern pig-tailed macaques (Macaca leonina) and milu deer (Elaphurus davidianus) from a zoo in China. Vet Med Sci. (2023) 9:992–8. doi: 10.1002/vms3.1014

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Deng, RG, Zhang, SX, Li, XM, Wang, RL, and Miu, FZ. Investigation of tuberculosis in some domesticated wild animals in Ningxia. China Anim. Health Insp. (1996) 1:25–6. Available at: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=p7sfyaWOx3NvqYzHJAExdVt595rCI_2BTYVo34-NW-4wRVVCZNG5gvp4poiXGoNGyWm7HNNGjCqNsqSE79VJb7JBOoSXTnM3-AWJHDUIyUxFiw6Fr5DuwvScR78NZ82_HBHNOCsONdw=&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS

Google Scholar

13. Duan, CF, Xing, DK, and Song, KZ. Observation on the effect of BCG vaccine in preventing deer tuberculosis. Chinese veterinary. Science. (1983) 4:58–9. Available at: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=p7sfyaWOx3PIVh3_TKEGJZ-p2N8bl6g1d49mCRM9lxrNGx6UBXOGhFfXdiQl7F5jghFc4L28dMe6yrzpqdsuXlotbQgx1lOcQsKOgIceZMvOO8DTNU50SBneV8tQelc5klHfsclypXw=&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS

Google Scholar

14. Fu, ZJ, Song, ZY, Feng, X, Wang, ZG, Hou, HY, Wang, CY, et al. Seroepidemiological survey of Para-tuberculosis, tuberculosis and brucellosis in sika deer in Jilin Province. Chinese J Vet Sci. (2013) 33:1696–9. Available at: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=p7sfyaWOx3P8qq3n9WV91-QLx5tXhurkwSikGcSg6txVHN_78YDrWEoICS1_5JViDiOGzBq0QaVuYgP-8aO5dAU8D_VETmKEW2XQDwVMs364qMuDwbKymutpdp_s9yGy-lQtvJPlUCg=&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS

Google Scholar

15. Huang, YT, Xu, JP, Tian, WD, Tan, YS, Lv, MK, and Yang, LY. Diagnosis of tuberculosis in Tarim red deer. Chin Vet Sci. (1995) 8:39. Available at: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=p7sfyaWOx3PU_aGrqh3AINtJmGDcxcu-TzL_gT6rp2iSvYquGRaql0zGoD0MrNzw7lbuaslZDXjmkp6ISUtelBFTRKfTHZkBKKTPAemOjcSoGmkLiLd3Lp1MolbV1ruh9vBOeVMjHFU=&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS

Google Scholar

16. Li, WT, Wu, ZL, Mei, YL, Wang, RK, Chen, W, Yang, YC, et al. Investigation on Mycobacterium bovis of sika deer in Zhejiang Province in 2016. Zhejiang J Anim Sci Vet Med. (2018) 43:37–9. Available at: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=p7sfyaWOx3PhSh2rD61cPIvgCuXCtg7GWdJEn3rVy5AeCVmW8-Q0rLVD25PuIfSm2pnCRB1xxUkByeYiCRby-N-KSAfvINSq7NLhLtjqiQdZj0yp18t24G5c1pfJihFo8HmqzZyHv1jGCY0cOENGSw==&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS

Google Scholar

17. Li, YM, and Wang, QK. Serological investigation of two diseases among sika deer in three northern provinces. China Anim Health Inspect. (2006) 44:39–41. Available at: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=p7sfyaWOx3N2pIXaVgeKXM8JSL233aMGl_YktaWj0w3wW_bSq6DndymPZdIJdhmKEX0HeBtBK37xl996z2u9ttysxrlj75c4PPnIkqLqIsAr9i6UmJcE6jrnIkIhNdqs8xeUra89rtU=&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS

Google Scholar

18. Liu, Y. (2010). Cloning and expression of IFN-γ gene in sika deer and its application in the diagnosis of tuberculosis. Huazhong Agricultural University https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=p7sfyaWOx3OQ28OF2asRm593DvsRsqg8PzxtiryHxj2XPVWyVwxcpU9gXyQ_Bw92JQASPxIEK2POVrdqeE4wGAHPUMnlOcocc5IWarDpNe5bwbss_Hi17-Qp8XAMa5gM9H4SNjNgtGFtBjdXT9PskQ==&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS

Google Scholar

19. Liu, QH, Hu, WQ, Hu, GX, and Wang, SZ. Diagnosis of deer tuberculosis by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. J Jilin Agric Univ. (1994) 4:98–103. Available at: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=p7sfyaWOx3Mj63MB87SD_XkWSny3jIG8jN0sUZvFgIfDMXTtpNiYq60mXagNjMVlT9NhS11mJeg4VYf4Oeht83sQUEj_BEBPrkPoPW-ahTYC4U2PcUPNdugftJsC8EIf_U6-LA6Nc7w=&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS

Google Scholar

20. Liu, QH, Wang, QK, Hu, WQ, Cui, GY, Hu, GX, and Wang, SZ. Study on the diagnosis of deer tuberculosis by allergic reaction method. J Jilin Agric Univ. (1994) 2:69–73. 80. Available at: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=p7sfyaWOx3OYh2GxhI_8BYM3ArZQ6Rz6J8Y7KHRwXvnWJt59Z2BBlbXHwBsA2ioL8SzoVxS4x1mouKP1Mmf4M3g_n4gaTrR3pBKWQDRveiFFQlPsWBXBjfWYzhNobDAr8st-rIODGnk=&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS

Google Scholar

21. Ma, GF, Lin, YH, Liu, HZ, Chen, GC, Shan, Z, and Shao, WY. Study on diagnosis and control of tuberculosis in deer. Chinese journal of. Prev Vet Med. (1985) 2:17–20. Available at: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=p7sfyaWOx3PndHcwjuaGumG-W4u7haqT_oSxCiKj0y4ERnE1YX121Y847uBM2FR72ZUhQwEyV3qcwYkinfI78r2jUdKV1qIoiEWQOoAux0vfgchT6sGKynfeCibxqYXuHCF0-CIfJ1M=&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS

Google Scholar

22. Quan, YH. Investigation report of tuberculosis outbreak in a deer farm in Yan bian. Jilin Anim Husb Vet Med. (1984) Available at: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=p7sfyaWOx3MtWa0D46d4OpaW4yH2n80gQFKUJMEOJhYskNrGynxaoE0462reTA9O-eZRchBC2fhnk-k9ZATXYXxd6sAIGasEHp9S0SQOnm5xzTftwyr1LuDYkyD035wU1x2uLsaJoQ4=&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS

Google Scholar

23. Wang, X. D., Duan, C. F., and Song, K. Z. (1981). Laboratory diagnosis of tuberculosis in deer. Special wild economic animal and plant Research (02): 21–22. Available at: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=p7sfyaWOx3M0gj68oa2gus3jZ1nan4XwpG9o4_X0-OzhHely6OWfvBZJ9feAOBYgC8ClqxVGE1RTJIQW3amLMTg_IwoKP6Mcu33cVTELokA7Pv1c63xvO1-fbfHzWGWel_UmPN9HDo8=&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS

Google Scholar

24. Wang, CY, Yang, L, Wang, QK, Song, ZY, Liu, JH, Zhou, L, et al. Epidemiological investigation of deer tuberculosis in Jilin Province. China Anim Husb Vet Med. (2010) 37:204–6. Available at: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=p7sfyaWOx3NhFxQBvvGsZzA69RL4jLnllqN5cYi8raNhqGgMGfj-bVSgbnSAHyQoVKorKdNDyZxG8T0i2Hpg3sWZk7nVTdBmGEMdN_-Ti6k6pRVckL-ZbHWYOUlt54rNHxvL9G825w0PlD8Bq-sxmA==&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS

Google Scholar

25. Wu, X. White-lipped deer tuberculosis allergy test. Chin Vet Sci. (2002) 9:32–3. Available at: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=p7sfyaWOx3N-rUqfAKH4WCowGXCNsl_M0dMhxBQKdjJIEylU9ssv2aHiEApJGtEiO3V93bjOPqT4ofwxkgURv9aeYNrrtoKsEf2jruyL8Twm5XL1h0a0pqMXPrZx7boGhi-UzKlAdf8=&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS

Google Scholar

26. Yang, L, and Hua, YP. Detection of deer tuberculosis by polymerase chain reaction. Chin J Vet Med. (2007) 9:37–8. Available at: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=p7sfyaWOx3MHtmqkUvqqjI_EarNLzrdVrqO4isIZ6ofPQu2bL_M6zXJbqJ-HF8ggkkLiq-EFDK6X4iced_yGJUPjP9dWl3Nh-3xJt-UNZj0LGitKjYgwcojRcqUxXo28WPt8GHUWPSU=&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS

Google Scholar

27. Yu, M., Zeng, F. L., Shi, K., Li, J. M., Diao, Y., Liu, X., et al. (2011). Serological investigation of tuberculosis and brucellosis in deer in Shenyang area. Progress in veterinary medicine. Available at: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=p7sfyaWOx3Ml2tZ0Yz5a0CsyrTdswqREM_qG4gKimkyD7-mw_0llmVdUpCDjFq_SaT5u_K4J4N7_sTWHPWeBWm-jxEULbi7p43ZuBmBemsTKkMBY9jid10q7a4XZLejx-y1YHu5VnnE=&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS

Google Scholar

28. Zhao, HX, Li, YZ, Yue, F, Yu, JJ, and Duan, YQ. Sample survey of tuberculosis in reindeer. Animal Husb Feed Sci. (2005) 5:56–7. Available at: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=p7sfyaWOx3PXDdf9JE9vr03LAWKVVs7hmMd34IlHmCNXxdVbZgfpxTfYvHb0BnIyr0qx-7bw34dKA06FZi3at59MC_mrfPw7td0rKpHR_xeDZkWu9ZioI2XspCC61mXPVKVEX_-f0gE=&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS

Google Scholar

29. Zhao, WY, Lu, FL, Cao, D, Zhao, HY, Lian, Z, Zhang, YS, et al. Indirect hemagglutination method was used to diagnose deer tuberculosis. Chinese J Vet Med. (1992) 1:13–4. Available at: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=p7sfyaWOx3OJiNqbp3JQYDXAYhyOKRC8jHtjRYnS5UwY5cAbtd9_-IqncBMa9ZvTUdCi41jtJ95_ylGZcMcUSqNW6zLcN4VR2Pe8EBs7Je6Y_QKVjSrAhRRVAZcd7lY860Yq9XShNuU=&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS

Google Scholar

30. Wang, ZD, Wang, SC, Liu, HH, Ma, HY, Li, ZY, Wei, F, et al. (2017) prevalence and burden of toxoplasma gondii infection in HIV-infected people: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet HIV. (2017) 4:e177–88. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(17)30005-X

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Gong, QL, Chen, Y, Tian, T, Wen, X, Li, D, Song, YH, et al. Prevalence of bovine tuberculosis in dairy cattle in China during 2010-2019: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. (2021) 15:e0009502. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009502

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Song, YH, Li, D, Zhou, Y, Zhao, B, Li, JM, Shi, K, et al. (2021) prevalence of bovine tuberculosis in yaks between 1982 and 2020 in mainland China: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. (2021) 21:397–405. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2020.2687

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Guyatt, GH, Oxman, AD, Vist, GE, Kunz, R, Falck-Ytter, Y, Alonso-Coello, P, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. (2008) 336:924–6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Viechtbauer, W. Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. J Stat Software. (2010) 36:48. doi: 10.18637/jss.v036.i03

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Schwarzer, G, Carpenter, JR, and Rucker, G. (2015). Meta-analysis with R[M]. Cham: springer.

Google Scholar

36. Cochran, WG. The combination of estimates from different experiments. Biometrics. (1954) 10:101–29. doi: 10.2307/3001666

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Higgins, JPT, Thompson, SG, Deeks, JJ, and Altman, DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. Br Med J. (2003) 327:557–60. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Gortázar, C, Torres, MJ, Vicente, J, Acevedo, P, Reglero, M, de la Fuente, J, et al. Bovine tuberculosis in Doñana biosphere reserve: the role of wild ungulates as disease reservoirs in the last Iberian lynx strongholds. PLoS One. (2008) 3:e2776. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002776

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Martín-Hernando, MP, Torres, MJ, Aznar, J, Negro, JJ, Gandía, A, and Gortázar, C. Distribution of lesions in red and fallow deer naturally infected with Mycobacterium bovis. J Comp Pathol. (2009) 142:43–50. doi: 10.1016/j.jcpa.2009.07.003

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Hutchings, SA, Hancox, N, and Livingstone, PG. A strategic approach to eradication of bovine TB from wildlife in New Zealand. Transbound Emerg Dis. (2013) 60:85–91. doi: 10.1111/tbed.12079

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Fink, M, Schleicher, C, Gonano, M, Prodinger, WM, Pacciarini, M, Glawischnig, W, et al. Red deer as maintenance host for bovine tuberculosis, alpine region. Emerg Infect Dis. (2015) 21:464–7. doi: 10.3201/eid2103.141119

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Glaser, L, Carstensen, M, Shaw, S, Robbe-Austerman, S, Wunschmann, A, Grear, D, et al. Descriptive epidemiology and whole genome sequencing analysis for an outbreak of bovine tuberculosis in beef cattle and white-tailed deer in northwestern Minnesota. PLoS One. (2016) 11:e0145735. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145735

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Ge, P, Wang, JR, and Wang, J. Progress in the prevalence and control of deer tuberculosis. Chin J Vet Med. (2018) 38:428–32. doi: 10.16303/j.cnki.1005-4545.2018.02.34

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Miller, RS, and Sweeney, SJ. Mycobacterium bovis (bovine tuberculosis) infection in north American wildlife: current status and opportunities for mitigation of risks of further infection in wildlife populations. Epidemiol Infect. (2013) 141:1357–70. doi: 10.1017/S0950268813000976

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Gao, L, Xiao, JH, and Wang, HB. Epidemic situation of deer tuberculosis. Spec Res. (2006) 2:74–7. doi: 10.16720/j.cnki.tcyj.2006.02.023

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

46. T/CAAA 075-2021 technical specifications for comprehensive prevention and control of tuberculosis and brucellosis in sika deer and wapiti breeding farm. (2023). Animal husbandry industry. Available at: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=3uoqIhG8C44YLTlOAiTRKibYlV5Vjs7ioT0BO4yQ4m_mOgeS2ml3UIwRq10v6azGCXuqAPgnAdkLwi4BE98RPAMBA0SYccxp&uniplatform=NZKPT.

Google Scholar

47. Graham, DA, Gallagher, C, Carden, RF, Lozano, JM, Moriarty, J, and O'Neill, R. A survey of free-ranging deer in Ireland for serological evidence of exposure to bovine viral diarrhoea virus, bovine herpes virus-1, bluetongue virus and Schmallenberg virus. Iran Vet J. (2017) 70:13. doi: 10.1186/s13620-017-0091-z

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Rhyan, J, Aune, K, Hood, B, Clarke, R, Payeur, J, Jarnagin, J, et al. Bovine tuberculosis in a free-ranging mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) from Montana. J Wildl Dis. (1995) 31:432–5. doi: 10.7589/0090-3558-31.3.432

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Griffin, JF, and Mackintosh, CG. Tuberculosis in deer: perceptions, problems and progress. Vet J. (2000) 160:202–19. doi: 10.1053/tvjl.2000.0514

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Ghielmetti, G, Hilbe, M, Friedel, U, Menegatt, IC, Bacciarini, L, Stephan, R, et al. Mycobacterial infections in wild boars (Sus scrofa) from southern Switzerland: diagnostic improvements, epidemiological situation and zoonotic potential. Transbound Emerg Dis. (2021) 68:573–86. doi: 10.1111/tbed.13717

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Kemal, J, Sibhat, B, Abraham, A, Terefe, Y, Tulu, KT, Welay, K, et al. Bovine tuberculosis in eastern Ethiopia: prevalence, risk factors and its public health importance. BMC Infect Dis. (2019) 19:39. doi: 10.1186/s12879-018-3628-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Wang, CY, Yang, L, Wang, QK, Song, ZY, Liu, JH, Zhou, L, et al. Epidemiological investigation of deer tuberculosis in Jilin province. Chin Anim Husbandry Vet Med. (2010) 37:204–6. Available at: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=sSXGFc3NEDI8s8SZ_NGCApncgaCloeHwxInvTHINPTbutkh6U1ja9oP4_qdg2F7KWgi8_VYXfGKufH29vtTqhI96XciibmFkyHPIKnJZZPguCBKPnlKD6hstqA9iicWXBfRfG9DFS_E=&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS

Google Scholar

53. Bao, H. (2020). Study on the seasonal adaptation strategies of moose habitat selection, nutrition, and intestinal microflora. [doctoral thesis]. [China (HL)]: Northeast Forestry University. Available at: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=SSV49NPffwf5QtOFxIauRiUwZOeARfpOYtdchuODSnQYHfocShjOvxlpIlainKkCUlzhnCWepcXEideKElHcR4iwcjOfdypqJNp9gG6yyYUTZ3ZIm3LY4bCuYTsasBvGSXpLEgqmDrTmBHh_35JgTg==&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS.

Google Scholar

54. McArt, SH, Spalinger, DE, Collins, WB, Schoen, ER, Stevenson, T, and Bucho, M. Summer dietary nitrogen availability as a potential bottom-up constraint on moose in south-Central Alaska. Ecology. (2009) 90:1400–11. doi: 10.1890/08-1435.1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Mysterud, A, and Ostbye, E. Effect of climate and density on individual and population growth of roe deer Capreolus capreolus at northern latitudes: the Lier valley. Norway Wildl Biol. (2006) 12:321–9. doi: 10.2981/0909-6396(2006)12[321:EOCADO]2.0.CO;2

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Klein, DR. Tundra ranges north of the boreal forest. J Range Manag. (1970) 23:8–14. doi: 10.2307/3896000

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Turbill, C, Ruf, T, Mang, T, and Arnold, W. Regulation of heart rate and rumen temperature in red deer: effects of season and food intake. J Exp Biol. (2011) 214:963–70. doi: 10.1242/jeb.052282

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Cook, JG, Johnson, BK, Cook, RC, Riggs, RA, Delcurto, T, Bryant, LD, et al. Effects of summer-autumn nutrition and parturition data on reproduction and survival of elk: Wildlife. Wildl Monogr. (2004) 155. doi: 10.2307/3830773

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

59. HUANG, ZYX, XU, C, van LANGEVELDE, F, PRINS, HHT, BEN JEBARA, K, and de BOER, WF. Dilution effect and identity effect by wildlife in the persistence and recurrence of bovine tuberculosis. Parasitology. (2014) 141:981–7. doi: 10.1017/S0031182013002357

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Narula, P, Sihota, P, Azad, S, and Lio, P. Analyzing seasonality of tuberculosis across Indian states and union territories. J Epidemiol Glob Health. (2015) 5:337–46. doi: 10.1016/j.jegh.2015.02.004

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Maclachlan, JH, Lavender, CJ, and Cowie, BC. Effect of latitude on seasonality of tuberculosis, Australia, 2002-2011. Emerg Infect Dis. (2012) 18:1879–81. doi: 10.3201/eid1811.120456

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Saraff, V, and Shaw, N. Sunshine and vitamin D. Arch Dis Child. (2014) 101:190–2. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2014-307214

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Risco, D, Salguero, FJ, Cerrato, R, Gutierrez-Merino, J, Lanham-New, S, Barquero-Pérez, O, et al. Association between vitamin D supplementation and severity of tuberculosis in wild boar and red deer. Res Vet Sci. (2016) 108:116–9. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2016.08.003

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Waters, WR, Nonnecke, BJ, Rahner, TE, Palmer, MV, Whipple, DL, and Horst, RL. Modulation of Mycobacterium bovis-specific responses of bovine peripheral blood mononuclear cells by 1, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D (3). Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. (2001) 8:1204–12. doi: 10.1128/CDLI.8.6.1204-1212.2001

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Hou, FJ, Chang, SH, and Yu, YW. Introduction to the deer situation in China. Prataculture. (2003) 11:47–50. Available at: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=p7sfyaWOx3OTgPwbL8w3Dk0QfOAR9fkzXBnow0cqS7gmkPhlsJoPyDhGGzskfCfM0C_lsVvZYgApRlCTpcU6SZCeDq_MBIpxgUMzFvIWry1oxARul-C8Rq9HcYQ6QE0idXtylsL_wzU=&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS

Google Scholar

66. Li, YM, and Wang, QK. Serological investigation of two diseases among sika deer in three northern provinces. China Anim Health Insp. (2006) 44:39–41. Available at: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=pFbCq-yO4FD7gAIYtv6mYzVnRu9hRbiQ3typaYKWeBPej2vcEQEOuz05pP52Ec0dwXs_M3dtndGe9rQ2uQSAcPRj21a2w4DKbw52CSuJgyzxgXoeunjGZlZZ7rjwSePvokoEBzTrTeg=&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS

Google Scholar

67. Fu, LX. Where is the road to high-quality development of deer farming, report on on-site research conducted by the deer industry branch in Jilin province, Heilongjiang province, and other places. Anim Husbandry Ind. (2020) 383:46–9. Available at: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=3uoqIhG8C44YLTlOAiTRKibYlV5Vjs7i8oRR1PAr7RxjuAJk4dHXojg876L-zlDiIFKs_T1sg94wC6NJrWhuazbwuKCjs0cu&uniplatform=NZKPT

Google Scholar

68. Zhang, G. R. (2006). Establishment and preliminary application of indirect ELISA for detection of bovine tuberculosis specific antibody. [Master's thesis]. [China (HB)]: Huazhong Agricultural University. Available at: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=SSV49NPffwebvVagtnzwrWJmJCW_1sYfWvlnIM7Rryoxt-Rpqy85fp_s5aBSuvMvMJELkr2e03D6pwrPWUoDP8XbQIG6I7Kjp7_DcrJGHyrj9pz1XXQJlPsgHJm62V6bdOLQO6GDsaHnhKLZO-rK0w==&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS

Google Scholar

69. Zhao, WY, Lu, FL, and Cao, D. Diagnosis of deer tuberculosis by indirect hemagglutination. Chin J Vet Med. (1992) 1:13–4. Available at: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=3uoqIhG8C44YLTlOAiTRKjkpgKvIT9NkyGkCpOZCCafPFlZFjI03BI7FB_N5HxXk8fgfAdrt42g_5_z7lgiVINtoYiSbmPfP&uniplatform=NZKPT

Google Scholar

70. Wu, WH, Yang, MS, and Yang, L. Establishment and preliminary application of PCR detection method for bovine tuberculosis. GZ Agric Sci. (2009) 37:87–9. Available at: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=3uoqIhG8C44YLTlOAiTRKgchrJ08w1e75TZJapvoLK0HPgmTbv4vC541jP4w9IKHxhJAvLE2saI_tFPJmy8Stj5_PEb0xziy&uniplatform=NZKPT

Google Scholar

71. de Kantor, IN, and Ritacco, V. An update on bovine tuberculosis programmes in Latin American and Caribbean countries. Vet Microbiol. (2006) 112:111–8. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2005.11.033

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

72. Xu, N, Zheng, D, and Mao, XQ. Tuberculosis γ-analysis of the results and influencing factors of interferon enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay release test. Chin J Lab Diagn. (2021) 25:89–92. Available at: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=3uoqIhG8C44YLTlOAiTRKibYlV5Vjs7iy_Rpms2pqwbFRRUtoUImHTFRyOxp9siW0mXRIohP9VnSfUSD4rMkxhr0ZodFdmEy&uniplatform=NZKPT

Google Scholar

73. Diagnostic criteria for pulmonary tuberculosis (WS 288-2017) [J]. Electronic Journal of Emerging Infectious Diseases. (2018) 3:59–61. doi: 10.19871/j.cnki.xfcrbzz.2018.01.017

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

74. Liu, YL, Zhang, KY, and Han, W. Research progress on TB-IGRA, T lymphocyte subpopulations and tuberculosis immunity. Mod Clin Med. (2023) 49:55–7. Available at: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=3uoqIhG8C44YLTlOAiTRKibYlV5Vjs7ioT0BO4yQ4m_mOgeS2ml3UJRAoKmFRiRCdRz5WgnVPKOJOXq0OrP4jQWRDJqDwbu&uniplatform=NZKPT

Google Scholar

75. Duan, ZT, and Zhuang, YJ. Application of SICT and ELISA in the detection of cow tuberculosis. ZJ. Anim. Husbandry. Vet Med. (2015) 40:4–5. Available at: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=3uoqIhG8C44YLTlOAiTRKibYlV5Vjs7ir5D84hng_y4D11vwp0rrtQFJ_i_7MgLXJ1n0vYjafgpbVYa0QWfS7_qNZNro0s5E&uniplatform=NZKPT

Google Scholar