ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Anesthesiol.
Sec. Perioperative Medicine
Volume 4 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fanes.2025.1610632
This article is part of the Research TopicEditors' Showcase: Perioperative MedicineView all 3 articles
Preliminary Insights into Cardiopulmonary Reserve and Hemodynamic Stability: Exploring Submaximal Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing Parameters as Potential Predictors of Intraoperative Hemodynamic Instability
Provisionally accepted- School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Abstract Background: Intraoperative hypotension (IOH) is associated with serious adverse outcomes after noncardiac surgery. Preoperative predictors of IOH remain poorly characterized. Intraoperative hemodynamic instability is strongly associated with IOH. The authors hypothesized that submaximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing (smCPET) measures of forced vital capacity (FVC) and gas-exchange derived pulmonary capacitance to peak oxygen uptake slope (GXCAP-VO2) would be associated with two measures of intraoperative hemodynamic instability: intraoperative vasopressor use and systolic average real variability (ARV), respectively. Methods: This secondary analysis of a feasibility study included adults >60 years undergoing elective noncardiac surgery and completed preoperative smCPET. Multiple cardiopulmonary measures, including FVC, peak oxygen uptake (VO2) and GXCAP-VO2 slope were collected. The primary outcome of intraoperative vasopressor use, and secondary outcome of ARV were tested with multivariable logistic regression and generalized linear models to assess associations supported by decision boundary and mediation analysis. Results: Among 101 participants, 54 had measured FVC (median 2.56 L) and 101 had measured GXCAP-VO2 slope (median 29.8). After adjustment, each standard deviation increase in FVC (0.89 L) was associated with halved odds of vasopressor use [2.47 liters (SD 0.88) vs. 2.9 liters (SD 0.86) adjusted Odds Ratio: 0.496 (95% CI: 0.25-1.01) p=0.052]. Participants with FVC <2.18 L and surgery duration >152 minutes had the highest risk of vasopressor use. Systolic ARV was negatively associated with increasing surgical time (p<0.001). For each 10-unit increase in GXCAP-VO2 slope, systolic ARV is expected to decrease by 9.8% (incidence rate ratio = 0.902, 95% CI [0.84, 0.97]). Conclusion: Lower measured FVC and GXCAP-VO2 slope were associated with measures of intraoperative hemodynamic instability in older adults undergoing noncardiac surgery. Preoperative assessment of pulmonary function and cardiopulmonary reserve may identify patients at higher risk for intraoperative hemodynamic instability. These exploratory observations establish a foundation for future research on smCPET measures for the prediction of perioperative complications, recognizing intraoperative hemodynamic instability as a complex interplay of patient, anesthetic, and surgical factors.
Keywords: Intraoperative hypotension, Intraoperative hemodynamic instability, Preoperative risk stratification, submaximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing, CpEt, Anesthesiology
Received: 12 Apr 2025; Accepted: 13 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Carr and Agarkov. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Zyad James Carr, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.