Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Cardiovasc. Med.

Sec. Cardiac Rhythmology

This article is part of the Research TopicPrecision Strategies for Atrial Fibrillation: Diagnosis, Risk, and Treatment InnovationsView all 11 articles

Evaluation of the Novel Multi-points Surface Thermometry Cryoballoon in the Treatment of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Provisionally accepted
Lu  BaiLu BaiRuikun  JiaRuikun JiaXiaochi  SunXiaochi SunJuan  ChanJuan ChanXinmeng  WangXinmeng WangShijie  WangShijie WangMing  LiuMing LiuYue  ShenYue ShenJiayu  SunJiayu Sun*Kaijun  CuiKaijun Cui*
  • West China School of Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Cryoballoon ablation(CBA)is extensively utilized to treat paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). The Multi-points Surface Thermometry Cryoballoon (CryoMST; Shanghai MicroPort Scientific Corp, China) has recently been introduced. Objectives: To evaluate the clinical efficiency and potential benefits of CryoMST in PAF. Methods: A propensity-score matched study compared 16 patients with PAF undergoing initial CBA with CryoMST against cohorts treated with Arctic Front Advance™ (n=48), radiofrequency ablation (RFA, n=48), and pulsed-field ablation (PFA, n=16). Peri-procedural and 12-month outcome data were compared among the four groups to assess the efficacy and safety of the CryoMST. Results: The CryoMST cohort showed significant reductions in total procedure time (83.00 [Q1, Q3: 75.00, 89.25] vs. 102.00 [Q1, Q3: 85.00, 127.75] min), ablation time (20.00 [Q1, Q3: 18.74, 21.00] vs. 46.00 [Q1, Q3: 38.00, 55.75] min), fluoroscopy time (12.93 [Q1, Q3: 11.15, 16.96] vs. 17.85 [Q1, Q3: 12.35, 23.38] min), fluoroscopy dose (81.80 [Q1, Q3: 69.93, 96.03] vs. 200.00 [Q1, Q3: 134.75, 311.50] mGy), and contrast agent volume (16.00 [Q1, Q3: 11.00, 22.00] vs. 52.50 [Q1, Q3: 45.00, 57.00] ml) compared to the Arctic Front Advance™ group (P < 0.05). CryoMST accurately predicted pulmonary vein occlusion, showing high concordance with pulmonary vein angiograph (sensitivity 89.3%, specificity 100.0%, Kappa value = 0.87, p < 0.001). At 12-month follow-up, rates of arrhythmia recurrence and complications did not differ among the groups. Conclusions: The CryoMST system demonstrates excellent diagnostic accuracy for pulmonary vein occlusion, obviating the need for routine venography. It significantly reduces procedure time, radiation exposure, and contrast use compared to conventional CBA, while maintaining comparable 12-month efficacy and safety to established ablation modalities for PAF.

Keywords: Atrial Fibrillation, Cryoballoon ablation, Multi-points Surface thermometry cryoballoon, Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), pulsed-field ablation (PFA)

Received: 11 Sep 2025; Accepted: 30 Nov 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Bai, Jia, Sun, Chan, Wang, Wang, Liu, Shen, Sun and Cui. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Jiayu Sun
Kaijun Cui

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.