REVIEW article

Front. Cardiovasc. Med.

Sec. Heart Failure and Transplantation

Clinical Research Progress of Renal Denervation for Heart Failure Treatment: Current Evidence, Controversies, and Future Directions

  • 1. Department of Clinical Laboratory, Wuhan Asia General Hospital, Wuhan, China

  • 2. Department of Critical Care Medicine, Wuhan Asia General Hospital, Wuhan Asia General Hospital Affiliated to Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430056, China, wuhan, China

Article metrics

View details

61

Views

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Abstract

Heart failure (HF) management continues to evolve, yet morbidity and mortality remain high, particularly among patients with comorbid hypertension and heightened sympathetic activity. In this narrative review, we summarize the mechanistic rationale for renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) in HF, synthesize available clinical evidence across HF phenotypes, and highlight key controversies and future research priorities. We emphasize differential responses across geographic regions and consider how ongoing trials may refine patient selection, procedural strategies, and endpoints. As evidence grows, RDN may become an adjunct device-based therapy for selected HF patients, but definitive outcome trials are still needed before routine implementation.

Summary

Keywords

Catheter-based intervention, Heart Failure, HFPEF, HFREF, Neuromodulation, renal denervation, Sympathetic Nervous System

Received

19 January 2026

Accepted

13 February 2026

Copyright

© 2026 Zhang, Wang, Wang, Yu and Liu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Bo Liu

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Share article

Article metrics