ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol., 23 November 2020

Sec. Microbiome in Health and Disease

Volume 10 - 2020 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2020.524769

Proof of Concept of Culturomics Use of Time of Care

  • 1. Aix Marseille Univ, IRD, AP-HM, France, MEPHI, Marseille, France

  • 2. Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire Méditerranée Infection, Marseille, France

Abstract

Culturomics, a high throughput culture method with rapid identification of the colonies by Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization/Time Of Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS), has demonstrated its contribution to the exploration of the gut microbiota over the past 10 years. However, the cost, work time and workload, considerably limit its use on a large scale or emergency context. Here, by testing two different stool samples, including a stool sample from a patient requiring rapid immunotherapy treatment, we tested a new fast culturomic protocol using two pre-incubation media, blood culture bottle and YCFA modified medium. Both media were supplemented with 2 ml of rumen fluid filtered at 0.2 μm and 2 ml of defibrinated and sterile sheep blood. Unlike the standard culturomics, subculturing of blood culture bottle were performed at reduced incubation time (3 h, 6 h, 9 h, 24 h) and at a longer incubation time (3 days, 7 days, and 10 days) at 37°C. By testing 5,200 colonies per MALDI-TOF MS and obtaining a comparable number of cultured bacterial species (131 to 143) in a stool sample, this new protocol reduced the number of colonies tested by 57%, working time by 78.6% and cost by 72.2%. In addition, we highlighted that the proportion of strict anaerobic species has increased by 24%, known to be the preferential targets for biotherapy, including Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Akkermansia muciniphila, Christensenella minuta, and Phascolarctobacterium faecium. Finally, this work showed that some bacterial species grew earlier but disappeared with prolonged incubation times.

Introduction

The culturomics of the bacterial species of the digestive tract probably represents an indispensable step toward biotherapy in the coming years for colitis, especially Clostridioides difficile colitis (), but also in the context of obesity (), malnutrition () and cancer immunotherapy (). In this context, the problematic aspect of culturomics is that, in its current state, it is extremely restrictive in terms of time, equipment and culture medium (). Thus, on average, in recent years, to have a clear vision of the cultivable microbial flora, we have to test 18 different culture conditions and test 10,000 spots by MALDI-TOF MS to obtain 100 different bacterial species (). Moreover, it is becoming increasingly clear that strict or facultative anaerobic bacterial species are the preferred biotherapy targets (; ; ; ). We were able to have a case for proof of concept in a patient (who is our colleague) in whom we wanted to find the bacterial species positively associated with the immunotherapy support. This allowed us to compare a method to quickly determine, before treatment was initiated, whether he had the bacterial species associated with a response to his treatment with antiPD-1 monoclonal antibody at the time of treatment (; ).

Materials and Methods

Patients and Samples

During this work, two stools were grown in the culturomics laboratory of the “Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire Méditerranée Infection” in Marseille, France to explore the intestinal microbiota of these individuals. In the urgent need to obtain the exploration of the intestinal microbiota of a patient requiring rapid treatment with anti-PD1 (), we analyzed his stool sample using a new fast culturomics protocol (see methods, Section culture). We cultivated a first stool sample from a 59-year-old Caucasian male patient. The second sample was collected from a 29-year-old healthy Caucasian woman. The stool was placed in a between-open stool culture pot and placed in a Zip bag (Oxoid, Dardilly, France) containing an anaerobic GasPak (Becton Dickinson, Le Pont de Claix, France) to undermine the anaerobic atmosphere. The stools were then introduced directly into an anaerobic chamber (Don Whitley Scientific, Bingley, UK) with limited oxygen exposure (less than 2 min) via the system presented above. In total, the first stool was analyzed using a direct inoculation of the stool on agar and two enrichments in liquid medium (Supplementary Table 1). The second stool was also cultured using a standard culture by direct agar inoculation, as well as with three liquid enrichments using blood culture bottle (Supplementary Table 1).

Culture

Standard Culturomics

First, all samples were performed in laminar flow hood at room temperature. The stool samples were aliquoted and frozen at −80°C before use. One gram of stool sample was diluted in 1 ml of phosphate buffered saline (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Illkirch, France) and the diluted samples were introduced with a syringe for pre-incubation into aerobic and anaerobic blood culture bottles (BioMerieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France) different culture conditions have been comprehensively detailed in previous publications (). Then, the blood culture vials were incubated at 37°C or 28°C depending on the culture conditions (). Inoculation on blood agar of the pre-incubated samples in blood culture bottles was performed for one month on different incubation days; Day 1, Day 3, Day 7, Day 10, Day 15, Day 21, Day 30 (). To this end, the preincubated stool samples were diluted from 10−1 to 10−10 in phosphate buffer saline (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Illkirch, France) to dilute the sample and identify the maximum number of bacterial species. Then, 50 µl of diluted sample was deposed and homogenized on blood agar plates (Biomerieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France). Each agar plate was incubated for 24 h at 37°C or 28°C (depending on the culture conditions) for aerobic conditions, or 48 h at 37°C or 28°C for anaerobic conditions, mimicked with Zip bag (Oxoid, Dardilly, France) containing an anaerobic GasPak (Becton Dickinson, Le Pont de Claix, France). Bacterial colonies different in appearance, size, or color were subcultured on blood agar (Biomerieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France) (; ). These agars were then incubated according to the culture condition previously described. Any isolated colony was applied to mass spectrometry for identification.

Fast Culturomics

All samples were cultivated in anaerobic chamber at 37°C. A summary of the methodology is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1

Direct Inoculation Method

First, a direct inoculation of the stool was performed. To do so, one gram of stool sample was diluted in 1 ml of phosphate buffer saline (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Illkirch, France). Then, 100 μl was taken from the sample, deposited and then homogenized in a second tube containing 900 μl of phosphate buffer saline (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Illkirch, France). This step was carried out several times in order to perform a cascade dilution at 1/10th (from 10-2 to 10-10). Subsequently, 50 μl of each tube was deposited and spread homogeneously on YCFA modified agar (DSMZ : Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen, Germany) (https://www.dsmz.de/microorganisms/medium/pdf/DSMZ_Medium1611.pdf) + 0.5g/L of Na2S + 1 g/L of sodium acetate () + 100 mg/L of Vitamin K2 () + 5% of sheep blood (BioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France) and on Columbia agar plates + 5% of blood (Cos, Biomerieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France). The agar plates are then incubated at 37°C under anaerobic condition, mimicked with Zip bag (Oxoid, Dardilly, France) containing an anaerobic GasPak (Becton Dickinson, Le Pont de Claix, France) for 48 h.

Patient 1 - Stool Sample 1

A liquid enrichment of the first stool sample at 37°C was performed in two anaerobic blood culture bottles (Supplementary Table 1). The first vial contained an anaerobic liquid medium (BioMerieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France) supplemented with 2 ml of rumen fluid filtered at 0.2 μm () and 2 ml of defibrinated and sterile sheep blood (BioMerieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France). The second blood culture bottle contained YCFA modified medium (DSMZ) supplemented with 0.5 g/L Na2S, 1 g/L sodium acetate (), 100 mg/L Vitamin K2 (), 15 mg/L Streptomycin and 20 mg/L of Trimethoprim. Subculture of the initially incubated blood culture bottle was performed after 3 h, 6 h, 9 h, 24 h, 3 days, 7 days, and 10 days of incubation at 37°C. For this, a cascade dilution (from 10-2 to 10-10) was carried out, 100 μl were taken from the most concentrated preincubated sample, deposited and then homogenized in a second tube containing 900 μl of phosphate-buffered saline (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Illkirch, France). Subsequently, 50 μl of each tube were deposited and spread homogeneously on Columbia agar + 5% blood (Biomerieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France) as well as on YCFA modified agar (DSMZ) + 5% sheep blood (BioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France) for the blood culture bottle containing the modified liquid YCFA medium, and only on blood agar for the blood culture bottle containing the defibrinated and sterile sheep blood (BioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France) and rumen fluid filtered at 0.2 μm (). The different plates of agar were then incubated at 37°C under anaerobic conditions for 48 h.

Stool Sample 2 Named Megagut

The second stool was analyzed according to the same protocol as the previous one, by direct inoculation and liquid enrichment, except that the blood culture containing the modified YCFA medium (DSMZ) + 0.5 g/L Na2S, 1 g/L of acetate sodium (), 100 mg/L of Vitamin K2 (), 15 mg/L of Streptomycin and 20 mg/L of Trimethoprim was supplemented with 2 ml of rumen fluid filtered at 0.2μm () and 2 ml of defibrinated and sterile sheep blood (BioMerieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France) (Supplementary Table 1). In addition, a third blood culture containing YCFA modified medium (DSMZ) supplemented with 0.5 g/L of Na2S, 1 g/L of sodium acetate (), 100 mg/L of vitamin K2 () without antibiotics was also tested for this sample and was then inoculated on the two types of agar plates of this work, YCFA (DSMZ) and Columbia agar + 5% blood (BioMerieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France) respectively.

Subculturing on Agar Plates

The isolation of the different bacterial colonies in terms of morphological aspect, size or color was carried out and the colonies were deposited on Columbia agar + 5% blood (Biomerieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France) at the rate of 8 colonies per petri dish (). Then, they were reincubated at 37°C under anaerobic condition.

Identification

Identification by MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry

The bacterial identification was performed using the high throughput MALDI-TOF MS technique based on the analysis of ionic entities by their displacement in an electric field (; ). The Microflex LT tool (Bruker Daltonik, Bremen, Germany), together with its FlexControl acquisition software and its MALDI Biotyper RTC analysis software, allow to compare the different spectra obtained. For this, we used the Bruker database upgraded by the addition of spectra of previously known bacterial species and new culturomics bacterial species found in our laboratory (). These databases contained at the time of submission of this study, 7,854 main spectrum (MSP) (each of main spectrum contained a concatenation of a minimum of 10 spectra) in Bruker database (RUO v.8), supplemented with 6,032 MSP updated in our laboratory (https://www.mediterranee-infection.com/acces-ressources/base-de-donnees/urms-data-base/). If this score was ≥1.9 at the two corresponding spots, the colony was considered identifiable mass spectrometric verification. However, if this score was less than 1.9 or if the results obtained differ for the two bacterial deposits, the identification was considered erroneous. Indeed, a score between 1.7 and 1.9 showed that the identification of the bacterial genus is possible, but the bacterial species identification was not interpretable. In parallel, a score below 1.7 did not allow for possible identification. In this case, the colony is again transplanted and reincubated under appropriate conditions, to be controlled again.

Molecular Identification

Identification by Sequencing of Ribosomal 16S RNA

The identification of bacterial colonies was initially performed using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. However, if identification is not possible and the spectral quality was correct and verified by the Flexanalysis software (Bruker), a Polymerase Chain Reaction targeting the ribosomal 16S RiboNucleic Acid (RNA) was performed, as previously demonstrated (; ). A new species was defined by a 16S rRNA sequence homology of less than 98.7% with the closest species proposed by the GenBank ().

Identification by Genome Sequencing

Genomic DNA was extracted as described above (See Methods, Section Identification) and DNA extracts were sequenced using MiSeq technology (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) with the paired end strategy and prepared with the Nextera XT Paired end kit (Illumina), as previously described (). The degree of genomic similarity of these two strains with their closely related species was estimated using phylogenetic tree, Digital DNA-DNA hybridization () and Orthologous Average Nucleotide Identity software ().

Results

Overall, testing 4,988 colonies by MALDI-TOF MS, 121 different bacterial species were cultivated from a standard agar plate culture and two liquid enrichments in stool sample (Sample 1) from a patient requiring rapid immunotherapy treatment (Supplementary Table 1 and 2). Of these 121 species, 1 bacterial species was previously unknown from human and 2 bacterial species were unknown to the human gut microbiota (Supplementary Table 2). The average number of colonies tested to identify one bacterial species was 41.2 (= 4,988/121), the working time required was 3 weeks, equivalent to 105 working h, for a cost of €2,949. Most of the bacteria isolated were strictly anaerobic bacteria (103/121, 85%) (Supplementary Table 3). During this work, 58 bacterial species were cultured using direct plating of the stool on agar and of these 58 bacterial species, 3 bacteria were found only in this culture condition and were lost after pre-incubation in liquid medium (Figure 2A and Supplementary Table 4A).

Figure 2

In addition, a short pre-incubation in the liquid medium for 3 h, 6 h, 9 h, and 24 h allowed the culture of 70, 55, 53, and 43 different bacterial species, respectively (Figure 2A and Supplementary Table 4A). A longer pre-incubation of stool in a liquid medium at 37°C for 3, 7, and 10 days induced the culture of 42, 47, and 47 bacterial species (Figure 2A and Supplementary Table 4A). Therefore, 14/121 bacterial species were identified only before 24 h and were not identified beyond 24 h of pre-incubation in a liquid medium. In parallel, 12/121 bacterial species were identified only after pre-incubation for 24 h (Figures 2A, C and Supplementary Table 4A). Of the 121 bacterial species cultivated from this sample, 104 started growing within 24 h, while 17 bacterial species started growing after 24 h (Figures 3A, B and Supplementary Table 4A). In parallel, 45 bacterial species appeared to finish their growth before 24 h against 76 after 24 h (Figures 3A, B and Supplementary Table 4A). Indeed, Figure 3 summarizes the duration of growth of the different bacterial species and shows that several bacterial species started and ended their growth before a 24-h pre-incubation. These data demonstrated that not all bacteria require prolonged pre-incubation time to grow, but rather reduced time and could be lost over time.

Figure 3

To confirm the effectiveness of this new method, we conducted the study of the gut microbiota of a second stool sample using this fast culture protocol. It is interesting to note that we were able to compare the results with our basic method of the 18 conditions because we have already tested a sample of the same person (). During this work, 5,200 colonies were tested by MALDI-TOF MS, allowing the identification of 131 bacterial species (Figure 4 and Supplementary Table 2). An average of 39.7 spots were tested in order to obtain one bacterial species (=5,200/131) (Figure 4). This culture was carried out for 3 weeks, representing 105 working h, at a cost of €2,999, and 87% (=114/131) of the cultivated species were strict anaerobic bacterial species (Figure 4 and Supplementary Table 3). Of these 131 species, 3 bacterial species were unknown to the human gut microbiota (Supplementary Table 2). Direct inoculation on agar allowed the culture of 29 different bacterial species (Figure 2B and Supplementary Table 4B). A short pre-incubation in a liquid medium for 3 h, 6 h, 9 h, and 24 h allowed the culture of 62, 37, 40 and 30 different bacterial species, respectively (Figure 2B and Supplementary Table 4B). A longer pre-incubation for 3, 7 and 10 days allowed the culture of 52, 37 and 52 bacterial species, respectively (Figure 2B and Supplementary Table 4B). Thus, 37 bacterial species were identified only before 24 h compared to 26 bacterial species after 24 h (Figures 2B, C and Supplementary Table 4B). Of the 131 bacterial species cultivated, 97 bacterial species started growing before 24 h, while 34 started growing after 24 h (Figures 3C, D and Supplementary Table 4B). In parallel, 54 bacterial species appeared to have completed their growth before 24 h compared to 77 after 24 h (Figures 3C, D and Supplementary Table 4B). These results confirm that there are bacterial species that complete their growth at reduced pre-incubation times in liquid medium.

Figure 4

When compared to the gold standard of culturomics, the workload had lasted 14 weeks, representing 490 working h, at a cost of €10,600 (Figure 4). We tested 13,238 colonies by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry and 143 different bacteria were cultured, including 1 new bacterial species named Lactobacillus caccae (16S rRNA gene and genome sequences were deposited in Genbank under accession number LT671596.1 and FTOY00000000.1; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) respectively (Figure 4 and Supplementary Table 3). On average, 92.5 colonies tested by MALDI-TOF MS were required to identify one bacterial species (Figure 4). Overall, 63% of bacterial species were strict anaerobic (Figure 4 and Supplementary Table 3). When adding both the standard and fast protocol, 218 bacteria were identified from this individual, with 87 bacteria found using only the 18 culture conditions, 75 using only the fast culturomics and 56 isolated by both techniques (Figure 4). In conclusion, in order to isolate a comparable number of bacterial species, this new protocol reduces the number of colonies tested by 57%, the work time by 78.6% and the cost for one stool sample by 72.2% (Figure 4). The proportion of strict anaerobic species was increased by 24% (Figure 4).

Discussion

Culturomics offers a considerable new perspective on the human gut microbiota knowledge, including recent clinical implications (; ; ). Nevertheless, so far, the main weaknesses of culturomics are both a significant cost and considerable workload (). This new culture protocol is faster and cheaper than gold standard culturomics. Using this new fast culturomic protocol, it was possible to cultivate a comparable number of bacterial species in one stool sample. Fast culturomics dramatically reduced the number of colonies tested, the work time and the cost, and increased the proportion of strict anaerobic species. Of these strictly anaerobic bacterial species, this new protocol of culturomics has made it possible to cultivate and identify bacterial species positively associated with the immunotherapy support of a patient treated by anti-PD1 monoclonal antibody (; ). We are confident in our results because we used negative and positive controls, as previously described ().

First, we compared our data with two significant publications that deal with bacterial species involved in cancer immunotherapy (; ). We showed that with standard culturomics, it was possible to cultivate 2/3 of bacterial species (Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron and Bacteroides uniformis) associated with anticancer immunotherapy according to , and 5/11 bacterial species of anticancer bacteria consortium according to (Bacteroides uniformis, Parabacteroides distasonis, Parabacteroides johnsonii, Eubacterium limosum, Phascolarctobacterium faecium). In parallel, with fast culturomics protocol, we cultivated 3/3 (Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron, Bacteroides fragilis and Bacteroides uniformis) and 6/11 (Bacteroides uniformis, Parabacteroides distasonis, Parabacteroides gordonii, Alistipes senegalensis, Eubacterium limosum, Phascolarctobacterium faecium) of bacterial species associated with anticancer immunotherapy (; ). In addition to being faster and cheaper, this technique has made it possible to identify more intestinal bacterial species positively associated with the immunotherapy support by anti-PD1 monoclonal antibody, than standard culturomics.

According to the current scientific literature, it has often been assumed that rare and fastidious bacterial species have a slow growth and can increase their proportion after prolonged incubation time (; , 11). Nevertheless, in this study, the majority of bacteria could be identified within 24 h of their pre-incubation in a liquid medium (Figures 2 and 3). Indeed, this new culture technique consists in using the liquid YCFA medium supplemented with defibrinated sheep blood and filtered rumen at 0.22 μm at reduced incubation times in liquid medium (Direct inoculation, 3 h, 6 h and 9 h, 24 h) as well as longer times (3 days, 7 days, and 10 days). We used YCFA medium because previous study showed YCFA medium facilitated the growth of rare and fastidious bacteria (). Other studies have shown that the incubation time does not influence the number of rare bacterial species that can be cultivated (; ). It has also been suggested that several bacterial species may be rare in the community because of a poor competitive ability compared to more abundant species (). All of these data suggest a more precise definition of « fastidious bacterial species ».

The strength of this work is that it responds to the disadvantages of standard culturomics. On the one hand, we noticed both a reduction of the workload and working time, as well as the total cost of the experiment. On the other hand, one of the major advantages of this work is that we cultivated fastidious bacterial species involved in human health and diseases. The scientific literature showed that the aforementioned bacterial species required a prolonged pre-incubation time (). However, in our study, Akkermansia muciniphila, which is involved in the regulation of PD1-based immunotherapy () and Barnesiella intestinihominis, which is involved in cyclophosphamide-induced therapeutic immunomodulatory effects () were cultivated in only 3 h in liquid medium (Supplementary Table 4a and Supplementary 4b). Other target bacteria in biotherapy, such as Faecalibacterium prausnitzii () and Alistipes senegalensis () strains were cultivated after pre-incubation in liquid medium of only 3 h (Supplementary Table 4a). This study also allowed the incrementation of our knowledge of the human microbiota as we showed that bacterial species were for the first time cultivated in humans or in the human gut (Supplementary Table 2). Nevertheless, this work was a proof of concept and was based only on the analysis of two samples. In addition, it would be useful to consider the use of aerobic culture condition supplemented with, for example, Metronidazole, in order to compensate for the lack of obligate aerobic bacterial species cultured. Moreover, to achieve a complete optimization of this proof of concept, we propose to carry out longer cultures in order to grow bacterial species that require a longer culture time.

In conclusion, for a comparable number of cultivated bacterial species, this new culturomic protocol allows a faster analysis of the intestinal microbiota. It also shows that bacterial species have a precocious grow (a few hours) and disappear over time. In addition, facultative and strict anaerobic bacterial species, that are preferential targets for biotherapy, appear to grow more rapidly and not to be prolonged over time. This is why, in future clinical applications, it would be possible to use this new technique as a pre-therapeutic assessment in patients requiring emergency PD1 treatment in order to select the best protocol for cancer treatment ().

Funding

This study was supported by the National Research Agency under the program « Investissements d’avenir », reference ANR-10-IAHU-03. This work was supported by the Région Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur and European funding FEDER PRIMI.

Statements

Data availability statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/Supplementary Material.

Ethics statement

The study was approved by the “Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire Méditerranée Infection”, under agreement number N ° 2016-011. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author contributions

SN performed the experiments and wrote the manuscript. J-CL and DR reviewed the drafts of the manuscript. SK proposed the use of culturomics at reduced times. DM performed the experiments of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry for rapid culturomics. ND performed the culturomics experiments. J-CL and DR were responsible for the data interpretation and critically revised the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Acknowledgments

We thank Yanis Roussel for helping us calculate the cost of the culturomics.

Conflict of interest

SK and DR are coinventors of a patent on the culture of anaerobic bacteria (CAS 28-FR1757574). SK, J-CL, and DR are coinventors of a patent for the preservation of bacteria (1H53 316 CAS 25). DR and SK are cofounder of Culture Top.

The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcimb.2020.524769/full#supplementary-material

References

  • 1

    AmraneS.HocquartM.AfoudaP.KueteE.PhamT.-P.-T.DioneN.et al. (2019). Metagenomic and culturomic analysis of gut microbiota dysbiosis during Clostridium difficile infection. Sci. Rep.9 (1), 12807. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-49189-8

  • 2

    AuchA. F.von JanM.KlenkH.-P.GökerM. (2010). Digital DNA-DNA hybridization for microbial species delineation by means of genome-to-genome sequence comparison. Stand Genomic Sci.2, 117–134. doi: 10.4056/sigs.531120

  • 3

    DaillèreR.VétizouM.WaldschmittN.YamazakiT.IsnardC.Poirier-ColameV.et al. (2016). Enterococcus hirae and Barnesiella intestinihominis Facilitate Cyclophosphamide-Induced Therapeutic Immunomodulatory Effects. Immunity45, 931–943. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.09.009

  • 4

    DaoM. C.EverardA.Aron-WisnewskyJ.SokolovskaN.PriftiE.VergerE. O.et al. (2016). Akkermansia muciniphila and improved metabolic health during a dietary intervention in obesity: relationship with gut microbiome richness and ecology. Gut65, 426–436. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308778

  • 5

    DiakiteA.DubourgG.DioneN.AfoudaP.BellaliS.NgomI.IIet al. (2019). Extensive culturomics of 8 healthy samples enhances metagenomics efficiency. PloS One14 (10), e0223543. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223543

  • 6

    DrancourtM.BergerP.RaoultD. (2004). Systematic 16S rRNA gene sequencing of atypical clinical isolates identified 27 new bacterial species associated with humans. J. Clin. Microbiol.42, 2197–2202. doi: 10.1128/jcm.42.5.2197-2202.2004

  • 7

    DubourgG.BaronS.CadoretF.CoudercC.FournierP.-E.LagierJ.-C.et al. (2018). From Culturomics to Clinical Microbiology and Forward. Emerg. Infect. Dis.24, 1683–1690. doi: 10.3201/eid2409.170995

  • 8

    DuncanS. H.HoldG. L.HarmsenH. J. M.StewartC. S.FlintH. J. (2002). Growth requirements and fermentation products of Fusobacterium prausnitzii, and a proposal to reclassify it as Faecalibacterium prausnitzii gen. nov., comb. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.52, 2141–2146. doi: 10.1099/00207713-52-6-2141

  • 9

    EverardA.BelzerC.GeurtsL.OuwerkerkJ. P.DruartC.BindelsL. B.et al. (2013). Cross-talk between Akkermansia muciniphila and intestinal epithelium controls diet-induced obesity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.110, 9066–9071. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1219451110

  • 10

    FennK.StrandwitzP.StewartE. J.DimiseE.RubinS.GurubacharyaS.et al. (2017). Quinones are growth factors for the human gut microbiota. Microbiome5, 161. doi: 10.1186/s40168-017-0380-5

  • 11

    ForsterS. C.KumarN.AnonyeB. O.AlmeidaA.VicianiE.StaresM. D.et al. (2019). A human gut bacterial genome and culture collection for improved metagenomic analyses. Nat. Biotechnol.37, 186–192. doi: 10.1038/s41587-018-0009-7

  • 12

    HibbingM. E.FuquaC.ParsekM. R.PetersonS. B. (2010). Bacterial competition: surviving and thriving in the microbial jungle. Nat. Rev. Microbiol.8, 15–25. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2259

  • 13

    HoldemanL. V.GoodI. J.MooreW. E. (1976). Human fecal flora: variation in bacterial composition within individuals and a possible effect of emotional stress. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.31, 359–375. doi: 10.1128/AEM.31.3.359-375.1976

  • 14

    KatoS.YamagishiA.DaimonS.KawasakiK.TamakiH.KitagawaW.et al. (2018). Isolation of Previously Uncultured Slow-Growing Bacteria by Using a Simple Modification in the Preparation of Agar Media. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.84 (19), e00807–18. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00807-18

  • 15

    KhamisA.RaoultD.La ScolaB. (2005). Comparison between rpoB and 16S rRNA gene sequencing for molecular identification of 168 clinical isolates of. Corynebacterium. J. Clin. Microbiol.43, 1934–1936. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.4.1934-1936.2005

  • 16

    KurmV.van der PuttenW. H.HolW. H. G. (2019). Cultivation-success of rare soil bacteria is not influenced by incubation time and growth medium. PloS One14, e0210073. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210073

  • 17

    LagierJ.-C.ArmougomF.MillionM.HugonP.PagnierI.RobertC.et al. (2012). Microbial culturomics: paradigm shift in the human gut microbiome study. Clin. Microbiol. Infect.18, 1185–1193. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12023

  • 18

    LagierJ.-C.EdouardS.PagnierI.MediannikovO.DrancourtM.RaoultD. (2015a). Current and past strategies for bacterial culture in clinical microbiology. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.28, 208–236. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00110-14

  • 19

    LagierJ.-C.HugonP.KhelaifiaS.FournierP.-E.La ScolaB.RaoultD. (2015b). The rebirth of culture in microbiology through the example of culturomics to study human gut microbiota. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.28, 237–264. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00014-14

  • 20

    LagierJ.-C.KhelaifiaS.AlouM. T.NdongoS.DioneN.HugonP.et al. (2016). Culture of previously uncultured members of the human gut microbiota by culturomics. Nat. Microbiol.1, 16203. doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.203

  • 21

    LagierJ.-C.DubourgG.MillionM.CadoretF.BilenM.FenollarF.et al. (2018). Culturing the human microbiota and culturomics. Nat. Rev. Microbiol.16, 540–550. doi: 10.1038/s41579-018-0041-0

  • 22

    LagierJ.-C.MillionM.TogoA. H.KhelaifiaS.RaoultD. (2019). Culturomics provide critical prokaryotes strains for anti-Listeria and anti-cancer probiotics. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents54 (4), 407–409. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2019.05.017

  • 23

    LeeI.Ouk KimY.ParkS.-C.ChunJ. (2016). OrthoANI: An improved algorithm and software for calculating average nucleotide identity. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.66, 1100–1103. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.000760

  • 24

    LoC.IISankarS. A.FallB.Sambe-BaB.DiawaraS.GueyeM. W.et al. (2016). High-quality draft genome sequence and description of Haemophilus massiliensis sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci.11, 31. doi: 10.1186/s40793-016-0150-1

  • 25

    MartínR.MiquelS.BenevidesL.BridonneauC.RobertV.HudaultS.et al. (2017). Functional Characterization of Novel Faecalibacterium prausnitzii Strains Isolated from Healthy Volunteers: A Step Forward in the Use of F. prausnitzii as a Next-Generation Probiotic. Front. Microbiol.8, 1226. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01226

  • 26

    RappéM. S.ConnonS. A.VerginK. L.GiovannoniS. J. (2002). Cultivation of the ubiquitous SAR11 marine bacterioplankton clade. Nature418, 630–633. doi: 10.1038/nature00917

  • 27

    RoutyB.Le ChatelierE.DerosaL.DuongC. P. M.AlouM. T.DaillèreR.et al. (2018). Gut microbiome influences efficacy of PD-1-based immunotherapy against epithelial tumors. Science359, 91–97. doi: 10.1126/science.aan3706

  • 28

    SengP.DrancourtM.GourietF.La ScolaB.FournierP.-E.RolainJ. M.et al. (2009). Ongoing revolution in bacteriology: routine identification of bacteria by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Clin. Infect. Dis.49, 543–551. doi: 10.1086/600885

  • 29

    SengP.AbatC.RolainJ. M.ColsonP.LagierJ.-C.GourietF.et al. (2013). Identification of rare pathogenic bacteria in a clinical microbiology laboratory: impact of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry. J. Clin. Microbiol.51, 2182–2194. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00492-13

  • 30

    SongJ.OhH.-M.ChoJ.-C. (2009). Improved culturability of SAR11 strains in dilution-to-extinction culturing from the East Sea, West Pacific Ocean. FEMS Microbiol. Lett.295, 141–147. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2009.01623.x

  • 31

    StackebrandtE. (2011). Molecular taxonomic parameters. Microbiol. Aust.32, 59–61. doi: 10.1071/MA11059

  • 32

    TanoueT.MoritaS.PlichtaD. R.SkellyA. N.SudaW.SugiuraY.et al. (2019). A defined commensal consortium elicits CD8 T cells and anti-cancer immunity. Nature565, 600–605. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-0878-z

  • 33

    Tidjani AlouM.MillionM.TraoreS.IIMouelhiD.KhelaifiaS.BacharD.et al. (2017). Gut Bacteria Missing in Severe Acute Malnutrition, Can We Identify Potential Probiotics by Culturomics? Front. Microbiol.23 (8), 899. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00899

  • 34

    VétizouM.PittJ. M.DaillèreR.LepageP.WaldschmittN.FlamentC.et al. (2015). Anticancer immunotherapy by CTLA-4 blockade relies on the gut microbiota. Science350, 1079–1084. doi: 10.1126/science.aad1329

Summary

Keywords

culturomics, gut microbiota, fastidious bacteria, anti-PD1 monoclonal antibodies, rapid culture

Citation

Naud S, Khelaifia S, Mbogning Fonkou MD, Dione N, Lagier J-C and Raoult D (2020) Proof of Concept of Culturomics Use of Time of Care. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 10:524769. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.524769

Received

06 January 2020

Accepted

22 October 2020

Published

23 November 2020

Volume

10 - 2020

Edited by

Tao Lin, Baylor College of Medicine, United States

Reviewed by

Ondrej Šedo, Masaryk University, Czechia; Volkan Özenci, Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Didier Raoult,

This article was submitted to Microbiome in Health and Disease, a section of the journal Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics