VscF in T3SS1 Helps to Translocate VPA0226 in Vibrio parahaemolyticus

Abstract

In Vibrio parahaemolyticus, type III secretion system 1 (T3SS1) is a major virulence factor that delivers effectors into the host eukaryotic cytoplasm; however, studies on its infection mechanism are currently limited. To determine the function of the vscF gene, we constructed the vscF deletion mutant ΔvscF and complementation strain CΔvscF. Compared with those of wild-type POR-1 and CΔvscF, the cytotoxic, adherent, and apoptotic abilities of ΔvscF in HeLa cells were significantly reduced (P < 0.01). Furthermore, in infected HeLa cells, the mutant strain reduced the translocation rates of VP1683 and VP1686 effectors compared to the wild-type and complementation strains. A BLAST search showed that vscF is homologous to the MixH needle protein of Shigella flexneri, indicating that the vscF gene encodes the needle protein of T3SS1 in V. parahaemolyticus. Additional translocation assays showed that VPA0226 translocated into the HeLa eukaryotic cytoplasm via T3SS1, secretion assays showed that VPA0226 can be secreted to supernatant by T3SS1, indicating that VPA0226 belongs to the unpublished class of T3SS1 effectors. In conclusion, our data indicate an essential role of vscF in V. parahaemolyticus T3SS1 and revealed that VPA0226 can be secreted into the host cell cytoplasm via T3SS1. This study provides insights into a previously unexplored aspect of T3SS1, which is expected to contribute to the understanding of its infection mechanism.

Introduction

Vibrio parahaemolyticus is a gram-negative bacterium that often causes food poisoning in coastal areas and leads to gastroenteritis and septicemia (Daniels et al., 2000). With the improvement of living standards and increase in seafood consumption, it has become an important foodborne pathogen (Nair et al., 2007; Hu et al., 2020). The type III secretion system 1 (T3SS1) of V. parahaemolyticus is an essential virulence determinant and is encoded by the vp1656-1702 gene cluster on chromosome 1 (Park et al., 2004b; Enninga and Rosenshine, 2009), which consists of a basal body and an extracellular needle complex.

In Yersinia pestis, current data have comprehensively demonstrated the secretion mechanism of T3SS. For example, some researchers (Payne and Straley, 1999; Hoiczyk and Blobel, 2001; Edqvist et al., 2003; Journet et al., 2003; Wood et al., 2008) studied and reported the assembly of T3SS of Y. pestis. However, to our knowledge, although Park et al. (2004b) have reported the clustering of the T3SS gene, the T3SS1 infection and assembly mechanism remain unclear. Only a few studies have reported that VP1656 and VP1657 act as translocators, ensuring the normal translocation of effector proteins into the host eukaryotic cytoplasm (Shimohata et al., 2012). These effectors, including VP1680, VP1683, VP1686, and VPA0450, act as virulence factors that interfere with normal signaling pathways in host cells (Yarbrough et al., 2009; Broberg et al., 2010; Sreelatha et al., 2013; Sreelatha et al., 2015). VPA0451 acts as a chaperone to stabilize VPA0450 (Waddell et al., 2014). Moreover, VP1682, as a chaperone protein of VP1680, enhances the cytotoxicity of VP1680 and is jointly regulated by small RNA spots with VP1680 (Tanabe et al., 2015).

Most gram-negative bacteria that produce T3SS polymerize a 6-kDa single needle protein of the secretion machinery into extracellular needle components that can perforate the eukaryotic plasma membrane and form a secretion conduit for effector translocation (Kimbrough and Miller, 2000; Kubori et al., 2000; Tamano et al., 2000; Blocker et al., 2001). Similar to YscF (Y. pestis) (Torruellas et al., 2005), PrgI (Salmonella enterica SPI-1) (Kato et al., 2018), and MixH (Shigella Flexner) (Cordes et al., 2003), the T3SS1 needle in V. parahaemolyticus is also critical; however, the information about it remains rather limited. In addition, effectors transported to the host eukaryotic cytoplasm by T3SS enable the subversion of host homeostasis and immune defenses (Cornelis, 2006; Galan and Wolf-Watz, 2006; Santos and Orth, 2015), thus enhancing bacterial virulence (Chung et al., 2016; Ratner et al., 2016). However, studies on the T3SS1 secretion mechanism and effector number in V. parahaemolyticus remain rather limited compared to those on Y. enterocolitica. Hence, it is essential to explore the biological functions of T3SS1 components and identify unknown effectors to elucidate the pathogenic mechanism.

In this study, we assessed the biological functions of the VscF protein, both in terms of cytotoxicity and effector translocation. Additionally, we proposed a possible role of the vscF gene in V. parahaemolyticus virulence and examined the unknown T3SS1 effector VPA0226.

Materials and Methods

Strains, Cell Lines, and Culture Conditions

The bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table 1. In this study, V. parahaemolyticus RIMD2210633 with a ΔtdhAS derivative was used as the wild-type (WT) POR-1 strain and cultured in Luria Bertani (LB) medium (Park et al., 2004a). Escherichia coli SM10λpir strains were used for the general manipulation and mobilization of plasmids into V. parahaemolyticus via conjugation (Miller and Mekalanos, 1988). The pMMB207 shuttle plasmid was used as an overexpression plasmid (Liu et al., 2018). Thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose (TCBS) agar was used to screen mutant and complementation strains containing chloramphenicol (Orkin, 1990). Antibiotics were used at the following concentrations: ampicillin, 100 μg/mL; kanamycin, 50 μg/mL; and chloramphenicol, 10 μg/mL.

HeLa, Raw264.7, and Caco-2 cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) (Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS; Invitrogen).

Construction of Mutants

The technology for the construction of mutant strains was based on a previous report (Park et al., 2004b). Briefly, overlap PCR was used to amplify DNA fragments containing the in-frame deletion mutant vscF using appropriate primers, as listed in Table 2. The DNA fragments were then cloned into the suicide pYAK1 vector to construct pYAK1-ΔvscF plasmids, which were introduced into POR-1 strains to construct the mutant ΔvscF.

Furthermore, complementation strain CΔvscF was constructed using genetic complementation by inserting the vscF gene with a synonymous point mutation into the genome of the ΔvscF mutant. The vscF gene and its two flanking regions were amplified from the POR-1 genomic DNA, allowing a point mutation (T4A) in vscF. CΔvscF was screened and identified using a method similar to that used for the ΔvscF construction.

The same technology was used to generate the POR-1-Δvpa0226, POR-2-Δvpa0226, and POR-3-Δvpa0226 mutants, as well as POR-1-/POR-2-/POR-3-S151A.

Growth Curve

The growth curve was examined by turbidity measurements at 600 nm (OD600) using LB broth as previously described (Huang et al., 2019). Overnight-cultured WT POR-1, ΔvscF, and CΔvscF were transferred into 50 mL LB broth (volume ratio: 1:100) and cultured at 37°C with shaking at 220 rpm. Cultures were measured, and the OD600 values were recorded every 1 h. At least three independent experiments were conducted. GraphPad Prism was used to draw the growth curve and perform statistical analysis using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA).

Cytotoxicity Assay

Cytotoxicity was assessed via morphology and the release of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) using an LDH Cytotoxicity Assay Kit (Beyotime, C0016) (Liu et al., 2018). First, HeLa cells were infected with WT POR-1, ΔvscF, and CΔvscF for 3 h with 5% CO₂ at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 10 in DMEM supplemented with 1% FBS (Kodama et al., 2007), washed three times with sterile phosphate buffered saline (PBS), fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, and then permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100. Samples were incubated with Tubulin-Tracker Red (Beyotime, diluted 1:50 with 5% BSA) at room temperature (25°C) for 1 h, and then counterstained with DAPI at 37°C for 15 min. Finally, the samples were washed three times with sterile PBS, and cell morphology changes were observed in the experimental groups using a ZEISS Oxi0 Observer Inverted microscope.

HeLa, Caco-2, and Raw264.7 cells were infected with WT POR-1, ΔvscF, and CΔvscF using the above-mentioned method in sterile micro 96-well plates for 3 h at 37°C with 5% CO₂. The release of LDH into the medium was quantified using the LDH Cytotoxicity Assay Kit according to the first method in the manufacturer’s instructions. Uninfected cells and cell-free well plates were used as negative and background controls, respectively. The LDH released by the lysis of cells with 10% (vol/vol) LDH release reagent was defined as the maximum cell release. The release of LDH was measured at OD490, which subtracted the absorbance of the background control group, which was the actual value. Cytotoxicity was calculated as follows: % cytotoxicity (test LDH release—cell spontaneous release—bacteria spontaneous release)/(cell maximal release—cell spontaneous release). Three independent experiments were conducted.

The release of LDH was quantified using the same methods used for the quantification of vpa0226-related diverse mutants. At least three independent experiments were conducted.

Adhesion Assay

The adhesion ability of the WT and mutant strains was determined using HeLa cells. Strains were grown in LB at 37°C to logarithmic phase, harvested by centrifugation at 5000 g for 10 min at low temperature, washed three times with pre-cooled PBS, and suspended in DMEM supplemented with 1% FBS. HeLa cells were grown in sterilized 12-well plates with DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS to 80%–90%. The preprocessed bacterial suspension was used to replace the DMEM in 12-well plates, at a final MOI of 10, and then incubated at 37°C with 5% CO₂ in an incubator for 2 h. Subsequently, the non-adherent bacteria were removed by washing three times with PBS. HeLa cells were then lysed with 200 μL per well of 0.1% Triton X-100 (v/v) for 10 min. Bacterial cell counts were determined by serially diluting the samples on the LB medium plates. At least three independent experiments were conducted.

Detection of Apoptosis and Mortality of Cells

Due to caspase-3-induced apoptosis (Serapio-Palacios and Navarro-Garcia, 2016), in this study, the GreenNuc™ caspase-3 assay kit (Beyotime, C1168S) and propidium iodide (PI) were used to detect apoptotic cells and cells with damaged membranes, respectively. With the same infection method as adhesion assay, after infection, the cells were digested with 0.25% trypsin for 3–5 min, collected by centrifugation at 600 × g for 5 min and washed three times with sterile PBS. The sample cells were incubated with GreenNuc™ caspase-3 (5 μM) and PI (10 μmol/L) at room temperature (25°C) for 30 min and kept away from light. Fluorescence-activated cell sorting was used to screen and detect the fluorescent cells. Sterile PBS was added to the wells to infect HeLa cells as a blank control. At least three independent experiments were performed, and GraphPad Prism was used to perform the statistical analyses.

Construction of the Adenylate Cyclase Reporter

In 1994, the adenylate cyclase reporter vector system was first developed by Sory et al. to detect the translocation of prokaryotic bacterial effectors in eukaryotic cells (Sory and Cornelis, 1994). Subsequently, this system has been used in a variety of bacteria, including V. parahaemolyticus (Shimohata et al., 2012; Chakravarthy et al., 2017). In fact, it uses a fusion protein of the target effector protein and Bordetella pertussis adenylate cyclase toxin (CyaA) to complete its purpose. In this study, we used this system to determine whether the identified secreted proteins were translocated into eukaryotic cells. Initially, we amplified the DNA sequences vp1683, vp1686, vpa0226, and cyaA using appropriate primers, as listed in Table 2. We then constructed fusion DNA sequences via overlap PCR using the appropriate primers, as listed in Table 2. Ultimately, fusion sequences were cloned into the pMMB207 vector to construct pMMB207-vp1683-CyaA, pMMB207-vp1686-CyaA, and pMMB207-vpa0226-CyaA fusion protein expression plasmids using the One Step Cloning Kit (Vazyme, C112).

Quantitative Reverse Transcription-PCR

The transcription level of vpa0226-cyaA fusion sequence in bacteria was determined by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR). POR-1, ΔvscF, and CΔvscF containing pMMB207-vpa0226-CyaA overexpression plasmid were grown in LB medium at 37°C to logarithmic phase, and RNA was extracted using an E.Z.N.A. bacterial RNA kit (Omega, USA). The mRNA transcription levels of vpa0226 were examined using Step-One and Step-One Plus Real-Time PCR machine (Thermo Fisher) with TB Green (Takara) using appropriate primers, as listed in Table 2. Using 16sRNA as an internal reference for normalization, the relative expression ratio was calculated for vpa0226 gene using the delta–delta threshold cycle (Ct) method (Pfaffl, 2001).

Measurement of Cyclic AMP (cAMP) Production and Western Blot Analysis

The adenylate cyclase reporter plasmids with fusion secreted effectors (pMMB207-vp1683-CyaA, pMMB207-vp1686-CyaA, and pMMB207-vpa0226-CyaA) were introduced into POR-1, ΔvscF, and CΔvscF strains to fabricate expression strains. Owing to cytotoxicity up to 90% and cell lysis for 3 h, we used the expression strains to infect HeLa cells for 2 h to identify intracellular cAMP levels using a cAMP ELISA product kit (R&D Systems, USA.) Following the manufacturer’s instructions (Kodama et al., 2007), and western blot analysis was performed using CyaA antibody (Santa Cruz) (Ono et al., 2006; Shimohata et al., 2012). Densitometric analyses were performed using the ImageJ software.

Additionally, the pMMB207-vpa0226-CyaA plasmid was introduced into POR-1, ΔvcrD1 (POR-2), ΔvcrD2 (POR-3), and ΔvcrD1/ΔvcrD2 strains to determine translocations (Park et al., 2004b). The pMMB207-vp1683-CyaA and pMMB207-vp1686-CyaA plasmids served as positive controls. The same processes were employed to examine whether VPA0226 translocates into the HeLa eukaryotic cytoplasm via T3SS1. Densitometric analyses were performed using the ImageJ software.

Secretion Assay of VPA0226

The secretion assay of effector proteins was based on a previous report (Chimalapati et al., 2020) and made a slight change. Overnight grown V. parahaemolyticus POR-1, POR-2, POR-3, and ΔvcrD1/ΔvcrD2 strains containing pMMB207-vpa0226-CyaA plasmid in MLB at 30°C were diluted to an OD600 of 0.3 in LB broth, grown at 37°C for 3 h to an OD600 of 0.5. Bacterial cultures were collected by centrifugation at 5000× g for 5 min, washed three times with sterile PBS, and then resuspended in 1× PBS. The supernatants of bacterial culture were filtered with a 0.22-micron filter and concentrated with an ultrafiltration tube (aperture: 30kD) by centrifugation at 3000× g for 20 min at 4°C. After centrifugation, the membrane was washed with 1× PBS buffer to obtain the concentrated protein. The secretion amounts of VPA0226 were analyzed by western blotting. Densitometric analyses were performed using the ImageJ software.

Statistical Analyses

Statistical analyses were performed using the GraphPad Prism software. The t-test was used to analyze the differences between experimental groups. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

Results

VscF Is Required for V. parahaemolyticus Cytotoxicity and Adhesion

We determined whether vscF participates in regulating growth, virulence, cytotoxicity, and adhesion. As shown in Figure 1, the trend and speed of growth were not notably different (Figure 1A), whereas cytotoxicity and adhesion significantly decreased (Figures 1B, C) with vscF deletion. Moreover, under phase-contrast microscopy, HeLa morphology of the ΔvscF group contained only a few rounded cells that tended to the control group compared with those in the POR-infected group. Meanwhile, the red tubulin skeleton of the ΔvscF group was distributed in a radial pattern. HeLa cells again possessed a round shape, and red fluorescence gathered around the nucleus when vscF was complemented (Figure 1D).

Figure 1

VscF Is Involved in the Modulation of Host Apoptosis

To examine whether vscF has an influence on host cell apoptosis and cytotoxicity, caspase-3 and PI were used to detect apoptosis of host cells in the POR-1, ΔvscF, and CΔvscF infection groups. As shown in Figures 2A, B, the fluorescence of caspase-3 staining significantly decreased (P < 0.01, Figure 2C) from 91.9% to 10.1% in the ΔvscF group, which was supplemented to 75.2% in the CΔvscF group. Meanwhile, the fluorescence of PI staining significantly decreased (P < 0.01, Figure 2C) from 95.7% to 2.3% in the ΔvscF group, which was supplemented to 76.5% in the CΔvscF group. These results suggested that vscF is involved in the apoptosis of HeLa cells.

Figure 2

VscF, Named Needle, Controls T3SS1 Effector Translocation

To study whether vscF affects effector translocation, a translocation assay was performed using the adenylate cyclase reporter vector system. As shown in Figure 3, the cAMP ELISA product kit data showed that the intracellular cAMP level in the ΔvscF group was significantly lower than that of the POR-1 and CΔvscF groups (P < 0.01; Figure 3A). In addition, the results of western blotting showed that the intracellular level of CyaA protein decreased in the ΔvscF-infected HeLa group (Figure 3B) compared with that in the POR-1-infected group, which was consistent with the cAMP results. Densitometry and statistical analysis showed significant differences in the intracellular levels of CyaA protein between the POR-1- and ΔvscF-infected groups (Figure 3C).

Figure 3

In addition, as shown in Figure 3D, VscF aligned with other gram-negative bacteria T3SS needle proteins, and the transmembrane structure of VscF was predicted contain 1–23 signal peptides in N-Terminus using Phyre2. These results suggested that the vscF gene may encode needle proteins and that its deletion can prevent the translocation of VP1683 and VP1686 from bacteria into HeLa cells.

Bacterial Protein VPA0226 Translocates Into the Host Eukaryotic Cytoplasm, Probably via T3SS1, Whose Translocation May Be Manipulated by T3SS1 VscF and VscI

To investigate whether VPA0226 translocates into the host cell cytoplasm via T3SS1, a translocation assay was performed using the same methods as described above. As shown in Figure 4, the cAMP ELISA product kit data showed that the intracellular cAMP levels of the ΔvscF and ΔvscI groups were significantly lower than those of the POR-1, CΔvscF, and CΔvscI groups (P < 0.01; Figure 4A). Further, western blotting results showed that the translocated amounts of CyaA-fused protein decreased in the ΔvscF and ΔvscI groups (Figure 4B). Additionally, densitometry and statistical analysis showed that the decrease in the translocated amounts of CyaA-fused protein (Figure 4B) were significantly different (P < 0.01; Figure 4C).

Figure 4

To study whether the transcription level of vpa0226 leads to the above significant difference, qRT-PCR was performed and the results showed that there was no significant difference between POR-1, ΔvscF, and CΔvscF groups in vpa0226 mRNA level (Figure 4D). Therefore, the deletion of vscF affected the secretion of VPA0226 rather than the expression.

A protein motif search showed that VPA0226 might harbor GDSL (SGNH) hydrolases and several putative enzyme domains (Figure 4E). Thus, these data suggested that both vscF and vscI possess the ability to control VPA0226 translocation; that is, VPA0226 secretion may occur through T3SS1.

VPA0226 Secreted Protein Can Be Secreted via T3SS1 and Translocated Into the Host Eukaryotic Cytoplasm via T3SS1

To confirm that VPA0226 is transported to the host eukaryotic cytoplasm using T3SS1, although it is located on chromosome 2, a translocation assay was performed using traditional POR-1, POR-2, POR-3, and ΔvcrD1/ΔvcrD2 strains (Park et al., 2004b). As shown in Figure 5, the intracellular cAMP level was significantly lower in the POR-2 infection group than in the POR-1 and POR-3 infection groups (P < 0.01; Figure 5A), while the translocated amounts of VPA0226 decreased with ECL™ Prime western blotting detection (GE Healthcare) at 30 s and 120 s (Figure 5B), and densitometry and statistical analysis showed significant differences (P < 0.01; Figure 5C). The secretion assay of VPA0226 was performed using various V. parahaemolyticus strains, including POR-1, POR-2, POR-3, and ΔvcrD1/ΔvcrD2 strains containing pMMB207-vpa0226-CyaA plasmid. We observed that VPA0226 secretion (supernatant) was significantly decreased in POR-2 and ΔvcrD1/ΔvcrD2 compared with POR-1 group, while the pellet detection level of VPA0226 in POR-2 and ΔvcrD1/ΔvcrD2 was significantly increased (P < 0.01; Figures 5D–F). Therefore, these results demonstrated that the secreted protein VPA0226 can be secreted by T3SS1, and is translocated into the host eukaryotic cytoplasm by T3SS1 when V. parahaemolyticus infects eukaryotic host cells.

Figure 5

In addition, transmembrane helix prediction indicated that the N-terminus of VPA0226 contains 1–23 signal peptides, highlighting that VPA0226 can be secreted from the bacterial cytoplasm to the extracellular space (Figure 6A).

Figure 6

To identify the essential functional sites in VPA0226, the cytotoxicity levels of the diverse mutants were determined. As shown in Figure 6B, both the inactivation and point mutation (S151A) of VPA0226 reduced its cytotoxicity, confirming that Ser-151 is an important functional site (Figure 6B).

Discussion

V. parahaemolyticus is an important foodborne pathogen that is naturally found in marine environments, including estuaries (Broberg et al., 2011). T3SS1 is an essential bacterial survival mechanism that induces toxicity in eukaryotic cells (Park et al., 2004b). In this study, we constructed the inactivated and complemented strains of the vscF (vp1694) gene and showed that ΔvscF exhibited reduced cytotoxicity (Figure 1B), indicating that vscF is directly or indirectly involved in the regulation of bacterial virulence and plays a critical role in T3SS1.

In most pathogens, adhesion is an important virulence factor closely related to pathogenicity and is considered the first step in the pathogenesis of microbial infections (Stones and Krachler, 2016). Therefore, we examined whether vscF influences adhesion. Compared with WT POR-1, the mutant strain showed significantly reduced adhesion ability (Figure 1C), indicating that T3SS1 is also tightly associated with adhesion ability. In 1989, Yamamoto and Yokota (1989), (Jiang et al., 2014) demonstrated an association between type VI secretion system 2 and adhesion. Compared with T3SS2, a study by Zhou et al. (2014) showed that VopV can assist V. parahaemolyticus in adhering to host cells via “effacement” of microvilli. However, we did not study the mechanism by which T3SS1 or vscF mediates adhesion; only the adhesion phenotype was studied.

Apoptosis plays an important role in the progression of bacterial infections (Peters et al., 2013). Studies have reported that the death of HCT116 and HeLa cells caused by T3SS1 is actually apoptosis (Bhattacharjee et al., 2005; Ono et al., 2006), and Bi et al. reported that in Y. pestis T3SS, reduced apoptosis is related to the caspase-3 signaling pathway (Bi et al., 2009). In this study, we observed that the apoptosis of HeLa host cells in the ΔvscF-infected group was significantly lower than that in the POR-1- and CΔvscF-infected groups (Figure 2), indicating that vscF is involved in the apoptosis of HeLa cells.

T3SS introduces a range of effectors into host eukaryotic cells through a syringe-like transmembrane device (Shames and Finlay, 2012; Portaliou et al., 2016), and these effectors participate in manipulating the host protein function or signaling pathways to exert virulence (Bhattacharjee et al., 2006; Burdette et al., 2009; Yarbrough et al., 2009; Higa et al., 2013). Therefore, effector translocation is vital for bacterial infectivity, which was the focus of this study. Thus, we examined the translocation of prokaryotic V. parahaemolyticus effectors to eukaryotic cells using an adenylate cyclase reporter vector system (Sory and Cornelis, 1994). We observed that the intracellular levels of VP1683 and VP1686 proteins notably decreased in the ΔvscF group compared to those in the POR-1 and CΔvscF groups (Figures 3A–C), indicating that vscF is necessary for the assembly of the T3SS1 translocation device and translocation of effectors. In most gram-negative pathogens, T3SS is assembled from various proteins, and effectors can be transported to the host eukaryotic cytoplasm only when the structural components are highly coordinated (Blocker et al., 2008). Surprisingly, VscF is homologous to MixH needle proteins using DANMAN (Figure 3D). Needles of T3SS are the core structure of extracellular needle complexes that are responsible for the transport of effectors (Dey et al., 2019). Hoiczyk and Blobel (2001), Kusmierek et al. (2019) have demonstrated that, Y. enterocolitica polymerizes a single needle protein into needle punctures in eukaryotic cells.

To date, only four V. parahaemolyticus effectors have been reported, including VP1680, VP1683, VP1686, and VPA0450 (Bhattacharjee et al., 2006; Burdette et al., 2009; Yarbrough et al., 2009; Higa et al., 2013; Waddell et al., 2014). Based on our previous transcriptomics analysis (PRJNA601057) and the literature, we speculated that VPA0226 belongs to the T3SS effector protein of V. parahaemolyticus. In fact, a study on VPA0226 by Chimalapati et al. was recently first reported and has demonstrated that VPA0226, a constitutively secreted lipase, through T2SS secretion not T3SS, is required for the escape of V. parahaemolyticus from host cells (Chimalapati et al., 2020). The supernatant amounts of vpa0226 in the CAB2 and CAB4 strains was reduced compared to CAB3, but this difference was not quantified (like grayscale analysis) in the study of Chimalapati et al. So, we again studied the relationship between VPA0226 and T3SS1, and speculated that VPA0226 maybe also be secreted by T3SS1, except for T2SS. In addition, VPA0226 was considered to be homologous to the T3SS effector SseJ of Salmonella, although it is located on chromosome 2 of V. parahaemolyticus (Christen et al., 2009; Kolodziejek and Miller, 2015). Like VPA0450, it has been reported that it can be secreted by T3SS1, although it is located on chromosome 2. In our previous study, vscI was found to be critical for effector translocation. In the present study, our results demonstrated that VPA0226 was translocated in HeLa eukaryotic cytoplasm, and its translocated amounts significantly decreased in the ΔvscF and ΔvscI infection groups compared with those in the POR-1 and CΔvscF or CΔvscI infection groups (Figure 4). Hence, similar to VP1683 and VP1686, VPA0226 could be transported to host cells via T3SS1. qRT-PCR results showed that the mRNA level of vpa0226 had no difference between POR-1, CΔvscF and CΔvscF strains, which revealed that T3SS1 indeed can affected the translocation of VPA0226 (Figure 4D).

We further determined VPA0226 translocation rates and showed that the rates of POR-2 and ΔvcrD1/vcrD2 were significantly lower than those in POR-1 and POR-3 (Figures 5A–C), indicating that VPA0226 is closely related to T3SS1 and not T3SS2. Additionally, the data of secretion assay showed that the secretion amounts (supernatant) of VPA0226 in POR-1 was significantly higher than those in POR-2 and ΔvcrD1/ΔvcrD1. On the contrary, the VPA0226 protein in pellet of POR-2 and ΔvcrD1/vcrD2 were significantly higher than those in POR-1 (Figures 5D–F), which indicated that although the deletion of T3SS1 (POR-2) did not make it entirely lose the secretion of VPA0226, but the secretion amounts of VPA0226 was significantly reduced, indicating that the deletion of T3SS affects the secretion of VPA0226. Thus, we speculate that VPA0226 might be secreted into the host eukaryotic cytoplasm through T3SS1 and T2SS in V. parahaemolyticus. This result is not surprising considering what is known about the redundant mechanisms used by pathogens. For instance, Matsuda et al. (2019) discussed the export of a V. parahaemolyticus toxin by Sec and type III secretion machineries in tandem.

In summary, our results revealed that the vscF gene has vital effects on the virulence-associated traits of V. parahaemolyticus. The results of the phenotypic assays and sequence alignment suggested that the vscF gene encodes the needle protein of T3SS1 in V. parahaemolyticus. Moreover, VPA0226 was identified as an unpublished T3SS1 effector, and future studies on VPA0226 function are expected to provide insights into the mechanism by which V. parahaemolyticus causes a disease.

Funding

This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31871893), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFF0208600), Jiangsu Agricultural Independent Innovation Project (SCX (18)2011), The National “Youth Top-notch Talent” Support Program (W0270187), Introduction of Nanjing Agricultural University Scientific Research Grants Project (804121), Central Guidance for Local Science and Technology Development (No. YDZX20173100004528), Science and Technology Joint Project of the Yangtze River Delta (No.17395810102), and Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Meat Production and Processing.

References

• 1

  BhattacharjeeR. N.ParkK. S.OkadaK.KumagaiY.UematsuS.TakeuchiO.et al. (2005). Microarray analysis identifies apoptosis regulatory gene expression in HCT116 cells infected with thermostable direct hemolysin-deletion mutant of Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Biochem. Bioph. Res. Co.335, 328–334. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.07.080

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 2

  BhattacharjeeR. N.ParkK. S.KumagaiY.OkadaK.YamamotoM.UematsuS.et al. (2006). VP1686, a Vibrio type III secretion protein, induces Toll-like receptor-independent apoptosis in macrophage through NF-kappa B inhibition. J. Biol. Chem.281, 36897–36904. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M605493200

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 3

  BiY.DuZ.YangH.GuoZ.TanY.ZhuZ.et al. (2009). Reduced Apoptosis of Mouse Macrophages Induced by yscW Mutant of Yersinia pestis Results from the Reduced Secretion of YopJ and Relates to Caspase-3 Signal Pathway. Scand. J. Immunol.70, 358–367. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3083.2009.02297.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 4

  BlockerA.JouihriN.LarquetE.GounonP.EbelF.ParsotC.et al. (2001). Structure and composition of the Shigella flexneri ‘needle complex’, a part of its type III secreton. Mol. Microbiol.39, 652–663. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02200.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 5

  BlockerA. J.DeaneJ. E.VeenendaalA. K. J.RoversiP.HodgkinsonJ. L.JohnsonS.et al. (2008). What’s the point of the type III secretion system needle? Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.105, 6507–6513. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0708344105

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 6

  BrobergC. A.ZhangL.GonzalezH.Laskowski-ArceM. A.OrthK. (2010). A Vibrio effector protein is an inositol phosphatase and disrupts host cell membrane integrity. Science329, 1660–1662. doi: 10.1126/science.1192850

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 7

  BrobergC. A.CalderT. J.OrthK. (2011). Vibrio parahaemolyticus cell biology and pathogenicity determinants. Microbes Infect.13, 992–1001. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2011.06.013

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 8

  BurdetteD. L.SeemannJ.OrthK. (2009). Vibrio VopQ induces PI3-kinase-independent autophagy and antagonizes phagocytosis. Mol. Microbiol.73, 639–649. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06798.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 9

  ChakravarthyS.HuotB.KvitkoB. H. (2017). Effector Translocation: Cya Reporter Assay. Methods Mol. Biol.1615, 473–487. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7033-9_33

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 10

  ChimalapatiS.SantosM. D.LafranceA. E.RayA.LeeW. R.Rivera-CancelG.et al. (2020). Vibrio deploys type 2 secreted lipase to esterify cholesterol with host fatty acids and mediate cell egress. Elife9. doi: 10.7554/eLife.58057

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 11

  ChristenM.CoyeL. H.HontzJ. S.LaRockD. L.PfuetznerR. A.MillerS. I. (2009). Activation of a Bacterial Virulence Protein by the GTPase RhoA. Sci. Signal2. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2000430

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 12

  ChungL. K.ParkY. H.ZhengY. T.BrodskyI. E.HearingP.KastnerD. L.et al. (2016). The Yersinia Virulence Factor YopM Hijacks Host Kinases to Inhibit Type III Effector-Triggered Activation of the Pyrin Inflammasome. Cell Host Microbe20, 296–306. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2016.07.018

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 13

  CordesF. S.KomoriyaK.LarquetE.YangS. X.EgelmanE. H.BlockerA.et al. (2003). Helical structure of the needle of the type III secretion system of Shigella flexneri (vol 278, pg 17103, 2003). J. Biol. Chem.278, 36980–36980. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(20)83517-0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 14

  CornelisG. R. (2006). The type III secretion injectisome. Nat. Rev. Microbiol.4, 811–825. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1526

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 15

  DanielsN. A.MacKinnonL.BishopR.AltekruseS.RayB.HammondR.et al. (2000). Vibrio parahaemolyticus infections in the United State-1998. J. Infect. Dis.181, 1661–1666. doi: 10.1086/315459

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 16

  DeyS.ChakravartyA.Guha BiswasP.De GuzmanR. N. (2019). The type III secretion system needle, tip, and translocon. Protein Sci. Publ. Protein Soc.28, 1582–1593. doi: 10.1002/pro.3682

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 17

  EdqvistP. J.OlssonJ.LavanderM.SundbergL.ForsbergA.Wolf-WatzH.et al. (2003). YscP and YscU regulate substrate specificity of the Yersinia type III secretion system. J. Bacteriol.185, 2259–2266. doi: 10.1128/JB.185.7.2259-2266.2003

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 18

  EnningaJ.RosenshineI. (2009). Imaging the assembly, structure and activity of type III secretion systems. Cell. Microbiol.11, 1462–1470. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2009.01360.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 19

  GalanJ. E.Wolf-WatzH. (2006). Protein delivery into eukaryotic cells by type III secretion machines. Nature444, 567–573. doi: 10.1038/nature05272

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 20

  HigaN.TomaC.KoizumiY.NakasoneN.NoharaT.MasumotoJ.et al. (2013). Vibrio parahaemolyticus Effector Proteins Suppress Inflammasome Activation by Interfering with Host Autophagy Signaling. PloS Pathog.9. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003142

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 21

  HoiczykE.BlobelG. (2001). Polymerization of a single protein of the pathogen Yersinia enterocolitica into needles punctures eukaryotic cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.98, 4669–4674. doi: 10.1073/pnas.071065798

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 22

  HuY. Q.LiF. X.ZhengY. X.JiaoX. N.GuoL. Q. (2020). Isolation, Molecular Characterization and Antibiotic Susceptibility Pattern of Vibrio parahaemolyticus from Aquatic Products in the Southern Fujian Coast, China. J. Microbiol. Biotechn.30, 856–867. doi: 10.4014/jmb.2001.01005

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 23

  HuangJ.ChenY. X.ChenJ.LiuC. J.ZhangT.LuoS. L.et al. (2019). Exploration of the effects of a degS mutant on the growth of Vibrio cholerae and the global regulatory function of degS by RNA sequencing. Peerj7. doi: 10.7717/peerj.7959

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 24

  JiangW.HanX. G.WangQ.LiX. T.YiL.LiuY. J.et al. (2014). Vibrio parahaemolyticus enolase is an adhesion-related factor that binds plasminogen and functions as a protective antigen. Appl. Microbiol. Biot.98, 4937–4948. doi: 10.1007/s00253-013-5471-z

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 25

  JournetL.AgrainC.BrozP.CornelisG. R. (2003). The needle length of bacterial injectisomes is determined by a molecular ruler. Science302, 1757–1760. doi: 10.1126/science.1091422

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 26

  KatoJ.DeyS.SotoJ. E.ButanC.WilkinsonM. C.De GuzmanR. N.et al. (2018). A protein secreted by the Salmonella type III secretion system controls needle filament assembly. Elife7. doi: 10.7554/eLife.35886

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 27

  KimbroughT. G.MillerS. I. (2000). Contribution of Salmonella typhimurium type III secretion components to needle complex formation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.97, 11008–11013. doi: 10.1073/pnas.200209497

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 28

  KodamaT.AkedaY.KonoG.TakahashiA.ImuraK.IidaT.et al. (2002). The EspB protein of enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli interacts directly with alpha-catenin. Cell Microbiol.4, 213–222. doi: 10.1046/j.1462-5822.2002.00176.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 29

  KodamaT.RokudaM.ParkK. S.CantarelliV. V.MatsudaS.IidaT.et al. (2007). Identification and characterization of VopT, a novel ADP-ribosyltransferase effector protein secreted via the Vibrio parahaemolyticus type III secretion system 2. Cell Microbiol.9, 2598–2609. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2007.00980.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 30

  KolodziejekA. M.MillerS. I. (2015). Salmonella modulation of the phagosome membrane, role of SseJ. Cell. Microbiol.17, 333–341. doi: 10.1111/cmi.12420

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 31

  KuboriT.SukhanA.AizawaS. I.GalanJ. E. (2000). Molecular characterization and assembly of the needle complex of the Salmonella typhimurium type III protein secretion system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. States America97, 10225–10230. doi: 10.1073/pnas.170128997

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 32

  KusmierekM.HossmannJ.WitteR.OpitzW.VollmerI.VolkM.et al. (2019). A bacterial secreted translocator hijacks riboregulators to control type III secretion in response to host cell contact. PloS Pathog.15. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007813

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 33

  LiuJ.DongY. H.WangN. N.LiS. G.YangY. Y.WangY.et al. (2018). Tetrahymena thermophila Predation Enhances Environmental Adaptation of the Carp Pathogenic Strain Aeromonas hydrophila NJ-35. Front. Cell Infect. Mi8. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2018.00076

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 34

  MakinoK.OshimaK.KurokawaK.YokoyamaK.UdaT.TagomoriK.et al. (2003). Genome sequence of Vibrio parahaemolyticus: a pathogenic mechanism distinct from that of V cholerae. Lancet361, 743–749. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12659-1

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 35

  MatsudaS.OkadaR.TandhavanantS.HiyoshiH.GotohK.IidaT.et al. (2019). Export of a Vibrio parahaemolyticus toxin by the Sec and type III secretion machineries in tandem. Nat. Microbiol.4, 781–788. doi: 10.1038/s41564-019-0368-y

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 36

  MillerV. L.MekalanosJ. J. (1988). A Novel Suicide Vector and Its Use in Construction of Insertion Mutations - Osmoregulation of Outer-Membrane Proteins and Virulence Determinants in Vibrio-Cholerae Requires Toxr. J. Bacteriol.170, 2575–2583. doi: 10.1128/JB.170.6.2575-2583.1988

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 37

  MoralesV. M.BackmanA.BagdasarianM. (1991). A series of wide-host-range low-copy-number vectors that allow direct screening for recombinants. Gene97, 39–47. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(91)90007-X

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 38

  NairG. B.RamamurthyT.BhattacharyaS. K.DuttaB.TakedaY.SackD. A. (2007). Global dissemination of Vibrio parahaemolyticus serotype O3 : K6 and its serovariants. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.20, 39–3+. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00025-06

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 39

  OnoT.ParkK. S.UetaM.IidaT.HondaT. (2006). Identification of proteins secreted via Vibrio parahaemolyticus type III secretion system 1. Infect. Immun.74, 1032–1042. doi: 10.1128/IAI.74.2.1032-1042.2006

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 40

  OrkinS. (1990). Molecular-Cloning - a Laboratory Manual, 2nd Edition - Sambrook,J, Fritsch,Ef, Maniatis,T. Nature343, 604–605. doi: 10.1038/343604a0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 41

  ParkK. S.OnoT.RokudaM.JangM. H.IidaT.HondaT. (2004a). Cytotoxicity and enterotoxicity of the thermostable direct hemolysin-deletion mutants of Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Microbiol. Immunol.48, 313–318. doi: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.2004.tb03512.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 42

  ParkK. S.OnoT.RokudaM.JangM. H.OkadaK.IdiaT.et al. (2004b). Functional characterization of two type III secretion systems of Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Infect. Immun.72, 6659–6665. doi: 10.1128/IAI.72.11.6659-6665.2004

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 43

  PayneP. L.StraleyS. C. (1999). YscP of Yersinia pestis is a secreted component of the Yop secretion system. J. Bacteriol.181, 2852–2862. doi: 10.1128/JB.181.9.2852-2862.1999

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 44

  PetersK. N.DhariwalaM. O.HanksJ. M. H.BrownC. R.AndersonD. M. (2013). Early Apoptosis of Macrophages Modulated by Injection of Yersinia pestis YopK Promotes Progression of Primary Pneumonic Plague. PloS Pathog.9. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003324

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 45

  PfafflM. W. (2001). A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res.29. doi: 10.1093/nar/29.9.e45

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 46

  PortaliouA. G.TsolisK. C.LoosM. S.ZorziniV.EconomouA. (2016). Type III Secretion: Building and Operating a Remarkable Nanomachine. Trends Biochem. Sci.41, 175–189. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2015.09.005

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 47

  RatnerD.OrningM. P. A.ProulxM. K.WangD. H.GavrilinM. A.WewersM. D.et al. (2016). The Yersinia pestis Effector YopM Inhibits Pyrin Inflammasome Activation. PloS Pathog.12. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006035

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 48

  SantosM. D.OrthK. (2015). Subversion of the cytoskeleton by intracellular bacteria: lessons from Listeria, Salmonella and Vibrio. Cell. Microbiol.17, 164–173. doi: 10.1111/cmi.12399

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 49

  Serapio-PalaciosA.Navarro-GarciaF. (2016). EspC, an Autotransporter Protein Secreted by EnteropathogenicEscherichia coli, Causes Apoptosis and Necrosis through Caspase and Calpain Activation, Including Direct Procaspase-3 Cleavage. Mbio7. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00479-16

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 50

  ShamesS. R.FinlayB. B. (2012). Bacterial effector interplay: a new way to view effector function. Trends Microbiol.20, 214–219. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2012.02.007

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 51

  ShimohataT.MawatariK.IbaH.HamanoM.NegoroS.AsadaS.et al. (2012). VopB1 and VopD1 are essential for translocation of type III secretion system 1 effectors of Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Can. J. Microbiol.58, 1002–1007. doi: 10.1139/w2012-081

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 52

  SoryM. P.CornelisG. R. (1994). Translocation of a hybrid YopE-adenylate cyclase from Yersinia enterocolitica into HeLa cells. Mol. Microbiol.14, 583–594. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1994.tb02191.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 53

  SreelathaA.BennettT. L.ZhengH.JiangQ. X.OrthK.StaraiV. J. (2013). Vibrio effector protein, VopQ, forms a lysosomal gated channel that disrupts host ion homeostasis and autophagic flux. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.110, 11559–11564. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1307032110

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 54

  SreelathaA.BennettT. L.CarpinoneE. M.O’BrienK. M.JordanK. D.BurdetteD. L.et al. (2015). Vibrio effector protein VopQ inhibits fusion of V-ATPase-containing membranes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.112, 100–105. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1413764111

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 55

  StonesD. H.KrachlerA. M. (2016). Against the tide: the role of bacterial adhesion in host colonization. Biochem. Soc. T44, 1571–1580. doi: 10.1042/BST20160186

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 56

  TamanoK.AizawaS.KatayamaE.NonakaT.Imajoh-OhmiS.KuwaeA.et al. (2000). Supramolecular structure of the Shigella type III secretion machinery: the needle part is changeable in length and essential for delivery of effectors. EMBO J.19, 3876–3887. doi: 10.1093/emboj/19.15.3876

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 57

  TanabeT.MiyamotoK.TsujiboH.Ya mamotoS.FunahashiT. (2015). The small RNA Spot 42 regulates the expression of the type III secretion system 1 (T3SS1) chaperone protein VP1682 in Vibrio parahaemolyticus. FEMS Microbiol. Lett.362. doi: 10.1093/femsle/fnv173

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 58

  TorruellasJ.JacksonM. W.PennockJ. W.PlanoG. V. (2005). The Yersinia pestis type III secretion needle plays a role in the regulation of Yop secretion. Mol. Microbiol.57, 1719–1733. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04790.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 59

  WaddellB.SouthwardC. M.McKennaN.DevinneyR. (2014). Identification of VPA0451 as the specific chaperone for the Vibrio parahaemolyticus chromosome 1 type III-secreted effector VPA0450. FEMS Microbiol. Lett.353, 141–150. doi: 10.1111/1574-6968.12416

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 60

  WoodS. E.JinJ.LloydS. A. (2008). YscP and YscU switch the substrate specificity of the Yersinia type III secretion system by regulating export of the inner rod protein YscI. J. Bacteriol.190, 4252–4262. doi: 10.1128/JB.00328-08

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 61

  YamamotoT.YokotaT. (1989). Adherence Targets of Vibrio-Parahaemolyticus in Human Small-Intestines. Infect. Immun.57, 2410–2419. doi: 10.1128/IAI.57.8.2410-2419.1989

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 62

  YarbroughM. L.LiY.KinchL. N.GrishinN. V.BallH. L.OrthK. (2009). AMPylation of Rho GTPases by Vibrio VopS disrupts effector binding and downstream signaling. Science323, 269–272. doi: 10.1126/science.1166382

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 63

  ZhouX.MassolR. H.NakamuraF.ChenX.GewurzB. E.DavisB. M.et al. (2014). Remodeling of the Intestinal Brush Border Underlies Adhesion and Virulence of an Enteric Pathogen. Mbio5. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01639-14

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar