ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol., 20 January 2022

Sec. Clinical and Diagnostic Microbiology and Immunology

Volume 11 - 2021 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2021.788757

Identification of a New Pathogenicity Island Within the Large pAH187_270 Plasmid Involved in Bacillus cereus Virulence

  • RD

    Rozenn Dervyn †

  • DW

    Devon W. Kavanaugh †

  • DC

    Delphine Cormontagne

  • BG

    Benjamin Glasset

  • NR

    Nalini Ramarao *

  • Université Paris-Saclay, INRAE, Micalis Institute, Jouy-en-Josas, France

Abstract

Objectives:

Bacillus cereus is responsible for food poisoning and rare but severe clinical infections. The pathogenicity of B. cereus strains varies from harmless to lethal strains. The objective of this study was to characterize three B. cereus isolates isolated from the same patient and identify their virulence potentials.

Methods:

Three isolates of B. cereus were isolated from various blood samples from a patient who developed sepsis following a central venous catheter infection. The three isolates were compared by WGS, genotyping and SNP analysis. Furthermore, the isolates were compared by phenotypical analysis including bacterial growth, morphology, germination efficacy, toxin production, antibiotic susceptibility and virulence in an insect model of infection.

Results:

According to WGS and genotyping, the 3 isolates were shown to be identical strains. However, the last recovered strain had lost the mega pAH187_270 plasmid. This last strain showed different phenotypes compared to the first isolated strain, such as germination delay, different antibiotic susceptibility and a decreased virulence capacity towards insects. A 50- kbp region of pAH187_270 plasmid was involved in the virulence potential and could thus be defined as a new pathogenicity island of B. cereus.

Conclusions:

These new findings help in the understanding of B. cereus pathogenic potential and complexity and provide further hints into the role of large plasmids in the virulence of B. cereus strains. This may provide tools for a better assessment of the risks associated with B. cereus hospital contamination to improve hygiene procedure and patient health.

Introduction

Bacillus cereus is a Gram positive, spore-forming bacterium found in nearly all environments. The pathogenic potential of the strains of B. cereus ranges from beneficial to benign to pathogenic (). B. cereus is the 3rd most frequent bacterial agent responsible for food-borne outbreaks in Europe (). In addition, infection with B. cereus is associated with non-gastrointestinal diseases and can potentially result in pneumonia, septicaemia, endocarditis, and meningitis, with immunocompromised individuals and neonates being particularly susceptible (; ). B. cereus is able to persist in the environment over long periods and can cause recurrent nosocomial infections ().

Among the most widely studied toxins of B. cereus are those related to the diarrheal syndrome, which include non-haemolytic enterotoxin (Nhe), Haemolysin BL (Hbl), and Cytotoxins K (CytK1 and CytK2), all of which are pore-forming toxins (; ; ; ). Additionally, enzymatic proteins have been identified, which contribute to B. cereus toxicity, such as InhAs and CwpFM (; ). Furthermore, the causative agent of emesis, the dodecadepsipeptide cereulide, is restricted to strains carrying pXO-1-like megaplasmids (). Although these factors are involved in B. cereus pathogenicity, the differentiation of pathogenic from non-pathogenic strains has proven difficult, even with molecular methods ().

We have recently identified a subset of genes, not previously associated with virulence, which presence helps to discern clinical from harmless strains (). Considering the difficulty in discerning strains as well as the time required for phenotypic tests, it is anticipated that future methodologies will focus on risk-orientated differential diagnostics, through inclusion of methods for detection of toxins, toxin genes and markers of virulence ().

In the present study, 3 strains were isolated from the same patient over an 87-day period. The first two strains were virtually identical with the third having lost a mega plasmid that contains several of the recently identified biomarkers. This last isolated strain had a decreased capacity to germinate and to induce virulence in an insect model, strongly suggesting that the pAH187_270 plasmid promotes virulence.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial Strains and Growth Conditions

A 63-year-old male patient was admitted at a French University Hospital with Crohn’s disease and chronic renal failure. The patient further developed sepsis and a central venous catheter infection. B. cereus isolates were isolated from various blood samples from this patient.

The patient underwent intensive rounds of antibiotic treatment including amoxicillin, ciprofloxacin (21 days), gentamycin (3 days), imipenem (18 days) followed by ciprofloxacin and vancomycin (10 days) (). Three positive blood cultures yielding B. cereus isolates (12CEB42BAC_S94, 12CEB40BAC_S20, 12CEB43BAC_S95, further named S94, S20 and S95, respectively) were obtained during a span of 87 days. The first sample (S94) was collected before the patient received antibiotic treatments, the second sample (S20) was collected after 23 days of treatment, and the last sample (S95) was collected 64 days after the previous one. The isolated strains were confirmed as being B. cereus by MALDI-TOF and no other bacteria were isolated in the blood cultures. The patient was later released from hospital, presenting no further signs of infection.

DNA Extraction, Genome Sequencing, and Assembly

The bacterial strains were grown overnight in BHI medium at 37°C, 200 rpm until mid-exponential growth phase and bacteria were pelleted. Total DNA was extracted as previously described (; ) and quantified with the Qubit® Fluorimeter. DNA concentrations were adjusted to 30 ng/ml and sequenced by the MiSeq Illumina platform hosted at the Pasteur Institute, giving 2x150 bp paired-end reads.

Sequencing analysis was performed as previously described () and included quality control using FastQC and MultiQC, de novo assembly of draft genomes with SPAdes version 3.13.0. Raw WGS data are accessible through https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/ (accession number PRJEB46455).

The genome sequences of the 3 strains were aligned against the pAH187_270 plasmid from the strain B. cereus AH187 using NUCmer for sequence alignment and MUMmer/MUMmerplot for visualisation/coverage plots. Further analysis was performed using the Proksee server (https://beta.proksee.ca/) to create circular alignments of reads to the reference plasmid.

Genotyping, Genome Annotation, and SNPs Analysis

MLST was determined for the 3 strains using the online MLST tool available from the Centre for Genomic Epidemiology (). Genome annotation was carried out using the Prokka automatic annotation tool v [1.13] (). Core and accessory genomes were determined by Roary with default settings, with the core genome defined as genes present in at least 3 of 4 samples, including B. cereus AH187 as reference strain.

SNPs were identified using Snippy (), which infers polymorphisms at the nucleotide level by aligning the sequencing reads against the reference plasmid pAH187_270.

Molecular Analysis

M13 sequence-based polymerase chain reaction (M13-PCR), derived from a RAPD technique, allows differentiating between various strain patterns. M13 typing was performed as described (). The DNA profiles were analyzed with BioNumerics 7.1 software (Applied Maths). The software compared the DNA profiles and clustered the strains according to their similarity.

The toxin gene profiles were identified by assessing the presence of the cytK-1, cytK-2, HBLA, HBLC, HBLD, NHEA, NHEB, NHEC, hlyII and ces genes by PCR using specific primers (). The strains were then clustered into genetic signatures (GS) according to their different combinations of presence/absence patterns ().

The strains were affiliated to one of the seven known phylogenetic groups according to the partial sequencing of the panC gene (). The production of the enterotoxins NHE and HBL was tested with the immunological tests BCET-RPLA Toxin Detection (Oxoïd) and Tecra (BDE VIA, 3M-Tecra) kits, respectively ().

Plasmid Curing

Plasmid-curing was tempted to determine the influence of the 270 kb pAH187 plasmid on strain characteristics. Plasmid-curing was investigated through culturing the strains at increased temperature (41°C and 43°C), addition of antibiotics (ampicillin – 50µg/ml or novobiocin - 2ug/ml), or ethidium bromide (15, 100, 125 µg/ml) during repeated or prolonged culture between 5-10 days.

Pathogenicity Island (PAI) Deletion on the pAH187 Plasmid

Knock-out of the region corresponding to the PAI on the pAH187 plasmid carried by the S94 strain was accomplished by double-cross over region substitution. Briefly, using the available sequencing information of the pAH187 plasmid (NC_011655), 1 kb regions upstream (region 130550 to 131543) and downstream (region 174739 to 175734) of the identified PAI were synthesized by the Genecust company (Boynes, France). A spectinomycin-resistance cassette was obtained from pAT28 (). The two fragments upstream and downstream of the PAI were cloned at each side of the cassette into the pAT113 vector () by the Genecust company. The constructed plasmid was named as pAT113 Δpai-pAH187 and transformed into chemically competent E. coli ET12567 and then by conjugation into B. cereus S94 strain (; ). Briefly, the donor strain and receptor strains were mixed at ratio 14:1 on a sterile membrane filter with a pore size of 0.05 µm (VMWP02500 Milipore) deposited on BHI agar plates for 18 h at 37°C. After mating, bacteria were resuspended from filter with 1.5 mL of colicin solution (). The transconjugates were selected on BHI agar plates supplemented with 300 µg/mL of spectinomycin at 37°C. The deletion of the PAI by double recombination event was verified by PCR using primers located upstream and downstream of the cloned region. The corresponding mutant was named S94 Δpai. Due to the size of the entire PAI, it was technically not possible to obtain a complemented strain.

Growth and Morphology

All strains were inoculated into BHI broth and grown at 37°C, 200 rpm. Bacterial growth was followed by measuring the OD at 600 nm at regular intervals.

To determine cellular morphology and size, bacteria were observed on BHI plates. The size of 25 colonies per plate was measured with a graduated scale. Alternatively, bacteria harvested at the end of exponential growth phase were observed under an AxioObserver. ZI Zeiss inverted microscope.

Sporulation/Germination

The sporulation efficiency of the strains was determined in HCT plus 0.3% glucose as previously described (). For germination assays, the spores were incubated in BHI medium for 55 min. Samples were taken at 0, 7 min, 16 min, 25 min, 40 min, 55 min. The number of remaining spores was determined as heat-resistant (85°C for 15 min) CFU on BHI plates and normalized to the initial spore value at T0.

Insect Experiments

Spores were injected at various concentrations between the second and third body segment from the rear of 10 last instar Galleria mellonella larvae as previously described (). The mortality rate was measured after 24 h of infection at 37°C.

Antibiotic Susceptibility

The Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (MICs) of selected antimicrobial agents were measured by using concentration gradient strips (Etest®, BioMerieux) (). The following agents were tested: ampicillin$, cefotaxime, imipenem$, vancomycin$, gentamicin$, rifampicin$, tetracycline$, ciprofloxacin$, chloramphenicol$, azithromycin, sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim$ and clindamycin$. Due to scarce availability of interpretative criteria in the literature, clinical breakpoints were used when available ($) ().

Results

Comparison of the Three Isolates

Three B. cereus isolates were isolated from three different blood cultures of the same patient within a period of 87 days and following intensive antibiotic treatments. No other bacteria were isolated from the blood cultures.

The M13 profiles of the 3 isolates were compared and were highly similar for the 3 isolates, suggesting that the 3 isolates are identical or very similar strains (Figure 1A).

Figure 1

In order to further compare the isolates, their genomes were sequenced. Mean size of the draft genomes was 5,533,542bp (range 5318760 [S95] - 5643975 [S94]). Mean GC % was 35.3%. In silico MLST analysis determined each strain to belong to the same MLST type 26.

The strains were further characterized for the presence of 10 genes implicated in virulence, the production of Nhe and the phylogenic group. The three isolates possess the nhe gene and were high Nhe producers. The hbl and cytK genes were absent in all isolates. The 3 isolates belong to phylogenetic group III. However, the ces gene was present in the two first isolates (S94 and S20) and absent in the last isolate (S95).

The patient received an intensive antibiotic treatment. To assess the potential impact of this treatment on the antibiotic resistance of the strains, the CMI against major antibiotic were measures for the first S94 and the last S95 isolated strains. The two isolates were resistant to ampicillin and cefotaxime. The strains were sensitive to the antibiotics that were administered to the patient. Strikingly, the 94 strain was susceptible to rifampicin whereas S95 strain displayed resistance to rifampicin (Table 1).

Table 1

KeyAmpicillinCefotaximeImipenemVancomycinGentamicinRifampicinTetracyclinCiprofloxacinChloramphenicolAzithromycinSulf + TrimethoprimeClindamycin
Recommandation CLSIS< 0,25 - R >0,5S < 8 - R > 64S < 4 - R > 16S < 4S < 4 - R > 16S < 1 - R > 4S < 4 - R > 16S < 1 - R > 4S < 8 - R > 32?S < 2/38 - R > 4/76S < 0,5 - R > 4
S941,5640,04710,0940,190,380,04730,190,250,19
S953640,04730,1960,190,0941,50,1250,750,125

MIC results (Etest method) for S94 and S95 B. cereus strains for 12 antibiotics.

Identification of a Missing Plasmid in the Last Isolated Strain

Mash analysis of the 3 strains identified the closest strain to S94 and S20 to be AH187 with an average nucleotide identity of 99.9%. The AH187 strain possesses the pAH_187- 270 kb mega-plasmid. Analysis of the core and accessory genomes reveals that nearly all variability among the 3 patient strains results from the accessory genes located on this mega-plasmid (Figure 1B).

To further assess the differences among the patient-isolated strains, snps were examined via Snippy using the plasmid, pAH187_270, as reference. A significant amount of variation is evident when comparing the S95 patient strain against the mega-plasmid, pAH187_270 (Table 2).

Table 2

VariantspAH187_270 plasmid
StrainS94S20S95
Complex1414303
MNP1110
SNP6061833
Insertion002
Deletion111
Total76771149

Snippy SNP analysis of patient strains against the plasmid pAH187_270 as reference.

Consistently, the pAH187_270 plasmid sequence resulted in nearly 100% coverage for S20 and S94 strains. By contrast, the S95 strain did not demonstrate significant alignment to the pAH187_270 plasmid (Figure 1C).

Altogether, the 3 isolates have an almost identical chromosome but differed by the absence of the pAH187_270 plasmid in the S95 isolate compared to the S94 and S20 isolates.

Identification and Reconstruction of a Pathogenicity Island

A closer look at the pAH187_270 plasmid revealed that some of the biomarkers previously identified as characteristic of clinical strains () were present on this plasmid (i.e., araC, gshAB, BCQ_PI180) (Figure 1C).

We confirmed by WGS that S20 and S94 carried these biomarkers, whereas the S95 strain did not. In addition, S94 and S20 carried the ces gene located in the pAH187_270 plasmid whereas S95 did not (not shown).

Based on the NUCmer alignment results, the localisation of the plasmid-based biomarkers of the S94 strain was determined. These biomarkers were located within a 43 kb span of the pAH187_270 plasmid, being distant from the CES operon for cereulide production (Figure 1C). We named this region the pathogenicity island (PAI). At first glance, it was observed that the PAI is flanked by resolvases and transposons indicating that they may have been obtained during horizontal gene transfer (Figure 1D). Further investigation of the plasmid pAH187 and the PAI revealed typical features used in defining PAIs. First, there is an abundance of direct repeats found in the plasmid. When a higher upper limit is set for maximum size (10,000 bp), 57 repeats of varying size, with 10 repeats of 396 bp clustered in the 175,466 to 189,105 region. However, with a lower limit of 200 bp, 20 hits are detected, with repeats detected on either side of the PAI at approx. 135,000 bp and 185,000 bp. Interestingly, pAH187 possesses a large inverted repeat 2,654 bp long, located 127,621-130,299 and 163,537-160,858, (99% match) found within the PAI. Furthermore, within the PAI, there is an increased presence of resolvases and transposases, which diminish in prevalence immediately outside the PAI. These are believed to play a role in the mobility of the DNA elements and facilitate their transfer and integration. Terminating one end of the PAI, a region, which spans from 175,000bp to 190,000 bp contains numerous tandem repeats, and finally terminates with a Holliday junction resolvase, further confirming the presence of the PAI.

Lastly, PAIs are often accompanied by changes in GC content in the inserted region, and this may be attributed to the DNA arriving from a different species through horizontal gene transfer. The GC content of the PAI was above average, compared to the immediately surrounding regions. It is to note that B. cereus is a low-GC-content bacteria and an increase in the GC content may thus indicate an integration of the PAI from a different species. However, as the difference in GC content is not a stark change, it may also represent an insertion or even a fusion event, as B. cereus megaplasmids (>100kb) have previously been hypothesized to result from fusion of smaller plasmids given the presence of multiple minireplicons ().

Several genes are present in the PAI: araC, BCAH187_C0208, BCAH187_C0212 being found at one end, BCN_P218 and BCAH187_C0212_2 towards the middle, and BCQ_PI180, BCQ_PI181, gshAB, 3 germination proteins encoded (including Ger(x)C), and a single protein (DUF11 domain-containing protein) being found on the opposing end of the pathogenicity island (Table 3).

Table 3

Marker nameBCQ_PI180gshABBCQ_PI181gerX
Gene nameBCAH187_RS28565BCAH187_C0244BCAH187_RS28570BCAH187_RS28600
Gene position164163 | 164519
(plasmidic)
167109 | 169376
(plasmidic)
164642 | 165757
(plasmidic)
171639 | 172793
(plasmidic)
Gene length357 nt2268 nt1116 nt1155 nt
Potential functionhelix-turn-helix transcriptional regulatorbifunctional glutamate–cysteine ligase GshA/glutathione synthetase GshBS-(hydroxymethyl)glutathione dehydrogenase/class III alcohol dehydrogenaseGer(x)C germination protein
% in non clinical strains9999
% in clinical strains71717171

PAI genes with gene position (on the reference genome pAH187_270 - NC_011655.1), putative function and occurrence (%) in the strain collection.

Influence of Plasmid Presence on Strain Phenotypes

The first and last isolates, S94 and S95, were evaluated in various phenotypical and functional assays. The two strains have similar growth capacity over time although the S95 strain was slightly impaired (Figure 2A). The two strains show no apparent difference in morphology. However, the colony morphology on plate is different with S95 colonies being wider (Figure 2B). In average, the size of the colonies was 3 times higher for the S95 strain compared to the S94 strain. In addition, S95 strain showed a drastic diminution in its germination rate compared to the S94 strain (Figure 2C). Finally, the S95 strain was severely impaired in its virulence potential compared to the S94 strain in the insect model of infection (Figure 2D). The lethal doses 50 (LD50) were 1,16.106 CFU/mL for the S94 strain and 5,29.108 CFU/mL for the S95 strain, thus displaying a 456-fold difference.

Figure 2

Taken together, these data strongly suggest that the plasmid pAH187_270 carried by the S94 strain and lost by the S95 strain plays an essential role during B. cereus virulence.

Role of the PAI on Strain Phenotypes

To confirm that the pAH187_270 plasmid has an influence on the strain pathogenicity, we first tried to cure the S94 strain from this plasmid. However, all our attempts to cure the plasmid were unsuccessful. Thus, we focussed on the PAI region containing most of the markers previously identified as characteristic of clinical strains. To assess whether the genes located in the PAI may explain the difference in the strain pathogenicity, the S94 strain was deleted for its PAI and the Δpai-mutated strain was compared with the wild type strain in various phenotypical and functional assays.

The strains were observed under the microscope and bacterial morphology showed that the two strains were almost similar in cellular shape and size although the Δpai mutant was slightly impaired in its growth capacity (Figures 2A, B).

As at least two germination genes were identified within the PAI (Figure 1), the capacity of the wt and mutant strain to sporulate and germinate was assessed. No difference in the sporulation efficiency was observed (not shown). However, the Δpai mutant showed a drastic diminution in its germination rate (Figure 2C). The same difference was observed for the S95 and the Δpai mutant compared to the S94 strain, strongly suggesting that the PAI is responsible for the germination efficiency of the initial S94 strain.

Finally, to assess whether the genes located in the PAI may explain the difference in the strain pathogenicity, the S94 and the Δpai mutated strains were evaluated in the Galleria infection model (Figure 2D). Strikingly, the Δpai mutant was severely impaired in its virulence potential compared to the wild type strain. The lethal doses (LD) was 3.80E+07 CFU/mL for the Δpai mutant strain, thus displaying a 34.5 fold difference, indicating that the PAI plays an important role in B. cereus virulence capacity.

The S95 strain showed morphological difference to the Δpai mutant and was even more severely impaired in its virulence capacity. This implies that the genes located within the PAI play an important role during B. cereus virulence, but that other genes located elsewhere in the plasmid are also required.

Discussion

Here, we report the identification of a large plasmid, lost over time within the same patient. This plasmid plays an essential role during B. cereus germination and virulence in an insect model. Notably, in strain S94, several biomarkers were found on the single large plasmid pAH187_270 within a newly identified pathogenicity island, providing further insights into B. cereus pathogenicity and complexity.

Within the B. cereus sensu lato group, the carriage of different virulence plasmids was traditionally considered a major contributor to the phenotypic properties that were critical for the speciation of B. anthracis, B. cereus, and B. thuringiensis (; ). However, recent findings suggest a need to reconsider traditional species assignments upon plasmid-mediated pathogenic phenotypes, in particular with the isolation of several B. cereus strains from patients with respiratory anthrax-like symptoms and carrying a pXO1-like plasmid (). The identification of the pAH187_270 as an important plasmid for B. cereus pathogenicity paves the way for future investigation and may indicate that pAH187_270 could be a marker of clinically relevant B. cereus strains.

In particular, a previous study carried out on strains representative of B. cereus pathogenicity concluded that most clinical strains possess the combination of 4 genetic biomarkers, named adhB, agrC, thiJ and BCQ_PI180 (; ). Strikingly, the biomarker BCQ_PI180 could be exchanged with other genes (ie: gshAB, BCQ_PI181, ger(x)C) giving similar results during the AUC analysis, with an AUC of 0.955 in all cases (). We consistently showed here that these genes belong to the a PAI located on a large plasmid. The presence of these genes was assessed in a collection of clinical and non clinical strains and revealed that they were present in 25/35 (71%) clinical isolates and 2 of 21 (9%) of non clinical isolates, respectively (Table 3) (), further highlighting their importance during B. cereus pathogenesis.

The presence of the ces gene is normally associated with emetic B. cereus strains, which constitute a cluster of food-borne outbreak (FBO) related strains and represent less than 1% of the strains identified during FBO. This is not surprising as the emetic syndrome is due to the ingestion of the cereulide, pre-formed in food, and does not necessarily require ingestion of the emetic strain itself. However, it has been previously shown that several ces-positive strains induced non-emetic symptoms (). This may be due to the fact that other genes, carried by the same plasmid, may have induced these non-emetic symptoms. Similarly, we have previously shown that strains carrying the ces gene were found to induce non-gastrointestinal clinical symptoms (). The markers present on this plasmid may have been at the origin of the symptoms, independently of the ces gene. The pAH187 plasmid presents a high degree of sequence similarity to the B. anthracis pXO1 plasmid (), but lacks the pXO1 pathogenicity island. By contrast, we have shown that this plasmid contains a specific pathogenicity island that defines pathogenic B. cereus isolates.

Several bacteria carry some of their virulence determinants on specific chromosome or plasmid locations referred to as pathogenicity islands (; ). So far, a pathogenicity island had never been described for B. cereus. This island is approximately 50 kb and flanked by resolvases and transposases, likely indicating an acquisition or fusion event. The deletion of this region decreases B. cereus virulence in an insect model of infection. Together, it is tempting to speculate that this plasmid carrying the B. cereus pathogenic island may define clinical B. cereus in the same way that pXO1 and pXO2 define the B. anthracis species.

The new discovery of unknown factors located on this plasmid paves the way for future research on their exact roles during B. cereus virulence. These data provide new hints into the role of large plasmids and plasmid-hosted genes in the virulence within the B. cereus group.

The patient underwent a severe antibiotic treatment and finally recovered from the infection. As the three isolates from this patient were sensitive to the antibiotics used, the treatment might have been successful. On the other hand, it is tempting to speculate that the antibiotic pressure and/or the immune system might have led to a loss of the pAH187_270 plasmid and that the new isolate, cured of the plasmid was rendered less pathogenic and was thus cleared.

In addition, the last isolate showed an acquired resistance to rifampicin, although no rifampicin was given to the patient. Nevertheless, this strongly suggests that, similarly to S. aureus, rifampicin should be used with caution to treat B. cereus infections.

Taken together, these new findings help in the understanding of B. cereus pathogenic potential and complexity and provide further hints into the role of large plasmids in the virulence of B. cereus strains. This may provide tools for a better assessment of the risks associated with B. cereus hospital contamination to improve hygiene procedure and patient health.

Funding

This work was supported by the European EJP CARE project from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under Grant Agreement No. 773830.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Statements

Data availability statement

The data presented in this study are deposited in the https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/ repository, accession number PRJEB46455.

Ethics statement

Ethical review and approval were not required for the study on human participants in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent for participation was not required for this study in accordance with the national legislation and the institutional requirements.

Author contributions

DK, RD, DC, and BG: performed experiments and analyzed data. NR: supervision, analyzed data, writing of manuscript, and funding sources. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Acknowledgments

We warmly thank Laurent Cavalié for the three patient’s isolates. We thank Etienne Dervyn for his help in plasmid reconstruction as well as Valentin Loux for bioinformatics support. We are grateful to the INRAE MIGALE bioinformatics platform (http://migale.jouy.inra.fr) for providing computational resources.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  • 1

    AdamsV.LiJ.WisniewskiJ. A.UzalF. A.MooreR. J.McClaneB. A.et al. (2014). Virulence Plasmids of Spore-Forming Bacteria. Microbiol. Spectr.2 (6). doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.PLAS-0024-2014

  • 2

    BaldwinV. M. (2020). You Can’t B. Cereus - A Review of Bacillus Cereus Strains That Cause Anthrax-Like Disease. Front. Microbiol.11, 1731. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01731

  • 3

    BottoneE. J. (2010). Bacillus Cereus, a Volatile Human Pathogen. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.23 (2), 382–398. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00073-09

  • 4

    BuissonC.GoharM.HuilletE.Nielsen-LeRouxC. (2019). Bacillus Thuringiensis Spores and Vegetative Bacteria: Infection Capacity and Role of the Virulence Regulon PlcR Following Intrahaemocoel Injection of Galleria Mellonella. Insects10 (5), 129. doi: 10.3390/insects10050129

  • 5

    CadotC.TranS. L.VignaudM. L.De BuyserM. L.KolstoA. B.BrisaboisA.et al. (2010). InhA1, NprA and HlyII as Candidates to Differentiate Pathogenic From non-Pathogenic Bacillus Cereus Strains. J. Clin. Microbiol.48, 1358–1365. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02123-09

  • 6

    CarlinF.FrickerM.PielaatA.HeisterkampS.ShaheenR.SalonenM. S.et al. (2006). Emetic Toxin-Producing Strains of Bacillus Cereus Show Distinct Characteristics Within the Bacillus Cereus Group. Int. J. Food Microbiol.109 (1-2), 132–138. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2006.01.022

  • 7

    CormontagneD.RigourdV.VidicJ.RizzottoF.BilleE.RamaraoN. (2021). Bacillus Cereus Induces Severe Infections in Preterm Neonates: Implication at the Hospital and Human Milk Bank Level. Toxins (Basel).13 (2), 123. doi: 10.3390/toxins13020123

  • 8

    CossartP.LecuitM. (1998). Interactions of Listeria Monocytogenes With Mammalian Cells During Entry and Actin-Based Movement: Bacterial Factors, Cellular Ligands and Signaling. EMBO J.17, 3797–3806. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.14.3797

  • 9

    FagerlundA.LindbäckT.StorsetA.GranumP.HardyS. (2008). Bacillus Cereus Nhe is a Pore Forming Toxin With Structural and Functional Properties Similar to ClyA (HlyE, SheA) Family of Haemolysins, Able to Induce Osmotic Lysis in Epithelia. Microbiol154, 693–704. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.2007/014134-0

  • 10

    FrickerM.MesselhausserU.BuschU.SchererS.Ehling-SchulzM. (2007). Diagnostic Real-Time PCR Assays for the Detection of Emetic Bacillus Cereus Strains in Foods and Recent Food-Borne Outbreaks. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.73 (6), 1892–1898. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02219-06

  • 11

    GlassetB.HerbinS.GranierS.CavaliéL.LafeuilleE.GuérinC.et al. (2018). Bacillus Cereus, a Serious Cause of Nosocomial Infections: Epidemiologic and Genetic Survey. PloS One13 (5), e0194346. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194346

  • 12

    GlassetB.HerbinS.GuillierL.Cadel-SixS.VignaudM. L.GroutJ.et al. (2016). Bacillus Cereus-Induced Food-Borne Outbreaks in France, 2007 to 2014: Epidemiology and Genetic Characterisation. Euro Surveill21 (48), 30413. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2016.21.48.30413

  • 13

    GlassetB.SperryM.DervynR.HerbinS.BrisaboisA.RamaraoN. (2021). The Cytotoxic Potential of Bacillus Cereus Strains of Various Origins. Food Microbiol.98, 103759. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2021.103759

  • 14

    GranumP. E.LundT. (1997). Bacillus Cereus and its Food Poisoning Toxins. FEMS Microbiol. Lett.157 (2), 223–228. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1997.tb12776.x

  • 15

    GuinebretiereM. H.AugerS.GalleronN.ContzenM.De SarrauB.De BuyserM. L.et al. (2013). Bacillus Cytotoxicus Sp. Nov. Is a Novel Thermotolerant Species of the Bacillus Cereus Group Occasionally Associated With Food Poisoning. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.63 (Pt 1), 31–40. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.030627-0

  • 16

    GuinebretièreM. H.BroussolleV.Nguyen-TheC. (2002). Enterotoxigenic Profiles of Food-Poisoning and Food-Borne Bacillus Cereus Strains. J. Clin. Microbiol.40 (8), 3053–3056. doi: 10.1128/JCM.40.8.3053-3056.2002

  • 17

    GuinebretièreM. H.ThompsonF. L.SorokinA.NormandP.DawyndtP.Ehling-SchulzM.et al. (2008). Ecological Diversification in the Bacillus Cereus Group. Environ. Microbiol.10, 851–865. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01495.x

  • 18

    HaydarA.TranS. L.GuillemetE.DarrigoC.PerchatS.LereclusD.et al. (2018). InhA1-Mediated Cleavage of the Metalloprotease NprA Allows Bacillus Cereus to Escape From Macrophages. Front. Microbiol.23, 1063. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01063

  • 19

    HillC.HollandI. B. (1967). Genetic Basis of Colicin E Susceptibility in Escherichia Coli. J. Bacteriol94, 677–686. doi: 10.1128/jb.94.3.677-686.1967

  • 20

    HuysG.D’HaeneK.CollardJ. M.SwingsJ. (2004). Prevalence and Molecular Characterization of Tetracycline Resistance in Enterococcus Isolates From Food. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.70 (3), 1555–1562. doi: 10.1128/aem.70.3.1555-1562.2004

  • 21

    JournalT. E. (2009). The Community Summary Report on Food-Borne Outbreaks in the European Union in 2007. EFSA J.271.

  • 22

    KavanaughD.GlassetB.DervynR.GuérinC.PlancadeS.CormontagneD.et al. (2021). New Genetic Biomarkers to Differentiate Non-Pathogenic From Clinically Relevant Bacillus Cereus Strains. Clin. Microb. Infect. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.05.035

  • 23

    KavanaughD.PorriniC.DervynR.RamaraoN. (2022). The Pathogenic Biomarker Alcohol Dehydrogenase Protein Is Involved in Bacillus cereus Virulence and Survival Against Host Innate Defence. PLoSOne, in press. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259386

  • 24

    LarsenM. V.CosentinoS.RasmussenS.FriisC.HasmanH.MarvigR. L.et al. (2012). Multilocus Sequence Typing of Total-Genome-Sequenced Bacteria. J. Clin. Microbiol.50 (4), 1355–1361. doi: 10.1128/JCM.06094-11

  • 25

    ParsotC. (1994). Shigella Flexneri: Genetics of Entry and Intercellular Dissemination in Epithelial Cells. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol.192, 217–241. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-78624-2_10

  • 26

    RamaraoN.LereclusD. (2005). The InhA1 Metalloprotease Allows Spores of the B. Cereus Group to Escape Macrophages. Cell Microbiol.7 (9), 1357–1364. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2005.00562.x

  • 27

    RamaraoN.SanchisV. (2013). The Pore-Forming Haemolysins of Bacillus Cereus: A Review. Toxins5, 1119–1139. doi: 10.3390/toxins5061119

  • 28

    RamaraoN.TranS. L.MarinM.VidicJ. (2020). Advanced Methods for Detection of Bacillus Cereus and Its Pathogenic Factors. Sensors (Basel).20 (9), 2667. doi: 10.3390/s20092667

  • 29

    RaskoD. A.RosovitzM. J.OkstadO. A.FoutsD. E.JiangL.CerR. Z.et al. (2007). Complete Sequence Analysis of Novel Plasmids From Emetic and Periodontal Bacillus Cereus Isolates Reveals a Common Evolutionary History Among the B. Cereus-Group Plasmids, Including Bacillus Anthracis Pxo1. J. Bacteriol189 (1), 52–64. doi: 10.1128/JB.01313-06

  • 30

    SeemannT. (2014). Prokka: Rapid Prokaryotic Genome Annotation. Bioinformatics30 (14), 2068–2069. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153

  • 31

    Stenfors ArnesenL.FagerlundA.GranumP. (2008). From Soil to Gut: Bacillus Cereus and Its Food Poisoning Toxins. FEMS Microbiol. Rev.32, 579–606. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2008.00112.x

  • 32

    TranS. L.CormontagneD.VidicJ.Andre-LerouxG.RamaraoN. (2020). Structural Modeling of Cell Wall Peptidase CwpFM (EntFM) Reveals Distinct Intrinsically Disordered Extensions Specific to Pathogenic Bacillus Cereus Strains. Toxins (Basel).12 (9), 593. doi: 10.3390/toxins12090593

  • 33

    Trieu-CuotP.CarlierC.MartinP.CourvalinP. (1987). Plasmid Transfer by Conjugation From Escherichia Coli to Gram Positive Bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Lett.48, 289–294. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1987.tb02558.x

  • 34

    Trieu-CuotP.CarlierC.Poyart-SalmeronC.CourvalinP. (1990). A Pair of Mobilizable Shuttle Vectors Conferring Resistance to Spectinomycin for Molecular Cloning in Escherichia Coli and in Gram-Positive Bacteria. Nucleic Acids Res.18 (14), 4296. doi: 10.1093/nar/18.14.4296

  • 35

    Trieu-CuotP.CarlierC.Poyart-SalmeronC.CourvalinP. (1991). An Integrative Vector Exploiting the Transposition Properties of Tn1545 for Insertional Mutagenesis and Cloning of Genes From Gram-Positive Bacteria. Gene106 (1), 21–27. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(91)90561-o

  • 36

    WayneClinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) (2010). Methods for Antimicrobial Dilution and Disk Susceptibility Testing of Infrequently Isolated or Fastidious Bacteria; Approved Guideline. 2nd (CLSI), M45A2E.

  • 37

    ZhengJ.PengD.RuanL.SunM. (2013). Evolution and Dynamics of Megaplasmids With Genome Sizes Larger Than 100 Kb in the Bacillus Cereus Group. BMC Evol. Biol.13, 262. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-13-262

Summary

Keywords

Bacillus cereus, clinical infection, virulence, mega-plasmid, pathogenicity island

Citation

Dervyn R, Kavanaugh DW, Cormontagne D, Glasset B and Ramarao N (2022) Identification of a New Pathogenicity Island Within the Large pAH187_270 Plasmid Involved in Bacillus cereus Virulence. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 11:788757. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.788757

Received

03 October 2021

Accepted

21 October 2021

Published

20 January 2022

Volume

11 - 2021

Edited by

Costas C. Papagiannitsis, University of Thessaly, Greece

Reviewed by

Ibrahim Bitar, Charles University, Czechia; Alberto Antonelli, University of Florence, Italy

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Nalini Ramarao,

†These authors have contributed equally to this work

This article was submitted to Clinical Microbiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics