Abstract
Rhinovirus causes many types of respiratory illnesses, ranging from minor colds to exacerbations of asthma. Moraxella catarrhalis is an opportunistic pathogen that is increased in abundance during rhinovirus illnesses and asthma exacerbations and is associated with increased severity of illness through mechanisms that are ill-defined. We used a co-infection model of human airway epithelium differentiated at the air-liquid interface to test the hypothesis that rhinovirus infection promotes M. catarrhalis adhesion and survival on the respiratory epithelium. Initial experiments showed that infection with M. catarrhalis alone did not damage the epithelium or induce cytokine production, but increased trans-epithelial electrical resistance, indicative of increased barrier function. In a co-infection model, infection with the more virulent rhinovirus-A and rhinovirus-C, but not the less virulent rhinovirus-B types, increased cell-associated M. catarrhalis. Immunofluorescent staining demonstrated that M. catarrhalis adhered to rhinovirus-infected ciliated epithelial cells and infected cells being extruded from the epithelium. Rhinovirus induced pronounced changes in gene expression and secretion of inflammatory cytokines. In contrast, M. catarrhalis caused minimal effects and did not enhance RV-induced responses. Our results indicate that rhinovirus-A or C infection increases M. catarrhalis survival and cell association while M. catarrhalis infection alone does not cause cytopathology or epithelial inflammation. Our findings suggest that rhinovirus and M. catarrhalis co-infection could promote epithelial damage and more severe illness by amplifying leukocyte inflammatory responses at the epithelial surface.
Introduction
Rhinovirus (RV) infections can cause respiratory illnesses ranging from mild colds to lower respiratory tract infections with wheezing. The RV-A and RV-C types are particularly associated with wheezing illnesses and hospitalizations due to asthma exacerbations (; ). Moraxella catarrhalis is an opportunistic pathogen that can cause otitis media, sinusitis, and exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Moraxella catarrhalis abundance is also increased in nasal secretions of children during RV upper respiratory and wheezing illnesses (; ). RV infections precede increased bacterial detection during these illnesses, and their concurrent or sequential detection is associated with an increased incidence of wheezing illnesses and asthma exacerbations ().
Respiratory viruses can promote secondary bacterial infections by inducing receptors that increase bacterial binding, which is the first step in bacterial invasiveness. In studies using several respiratory viruses, virus infections increased the expression of respiratory epithelial receptors that can be used by Haemophilus influenzae (; ) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (). Moraxella catarrhalis has several outer membrane proteins (OMPs) (e.g., UspA1, UspA2, and Hemagglutinin [Hag/MID]) that can bind to multiple cellular proteins, including carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule (CEACAM) and matrix proteins, including fibronectin and laminin (). CEACAM1, CEACAM5 (carcinoembryonic antigen or CEA), and 6 are expressed in the respiratory epithelium in varying co-expression patterns (). Secreted CEACAM5 and 6 are detected in normal bronchial mucus (; ). CEACAM1 can serve as a receptor for the respiratory pathogens M. catarrhalis, non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae, and Neisseria meningitidis and the urogenital pathogen N. gonorrhoeae (; ). In addition to bacterial binding, CEACAM engagement also triggers endocytosis and transcytosis of N. gonorrhoeae allowing epithelial barrier function to remain intact (). Virus-induced interferon responses may promote respiratory tract colonization by pathobionts, including M. catarrhalis, by dampening innate immune responses necessary for bacterial clearance (; ). Finally, viral infections can disturb epithelial cell barrier function, and this activity can promote invasiveness. However, the specific mechanisms that cause RV-M. catarrhalis co-infections to increase the abundance of bacteria in the airways and the severity of illness are currently unknown.
In this study, we tested the hypothesis that RV infection promotes M. catarrhalis adhesion and survival on the respiratory epithelium by increasing the production of M. catarrhalis OMPs and upregulating CEACAM production on airway epithelial cells. To test this hypothesis, we used an in vitro model of differentiated bronchial epithelial cells and identified effects of RV co-infection on M. catarrhalis cell association, abundance, and cellular responses.
Results
Moraxella catarrhalis adherence and survival on differentiated airway epithelial cells
To determine the effects of M. catarrhalis on airway epithelial cells, we infected cultures of airway epithelial cells differentiated at air-liquid interface (ALI) with M. catarrhalis strain MC14 and monitored bacterial abundance and cellular responses. Over a 5-day incubation period, the number of cell-associated bacteria decreased by ~3 log units (Figure 1A). We did not observe any adverse effects of M. catarrhalis on bronchial epithelial cell morphology or ciliary motion throughout infection. Trans-epithelial resistance (TEER), a measure of epithelial barrier function, did not change at 24 h and tended to increase by 48 h post-infection (Figure 1B). This is in contrast to the effect of another common respiratory tract pathogen, S. aureus, which caused a decrease in TEER indicating damage to the epithelial barrier.
Figure 1
Rhinovirus effects on M. catarrhalis association with epithelial cells
To determine the effects of RV infection on M. catarrhalis adherence and survival, we inoculated the apical surface of differentiated bronchial epithelium with RV-A16, followed 2 hours later by infection with a clinical isolate of M. catarrhalis (strain MC14). Repeat experiments in cells from four epithelial cell donors demonstrated that RV-A16 infection significantly increased cell-associated M. catarrhalis (geometric means for MC = 2.2×104, MC+RV = 4.9×105; P = 0.003) (Figure 2A). Notably, M. catarrhalis did not influence RV replication (Figure 2B). RV infection caused significant cytotoxicity, as measured by LDH release (mean for control = 0.08, MC = 0.11, RV = 0.67, MC+RV = 0.64; control vs RV or MC+RV, P < 0.0001) (Figure 2C) that was not altered by M. catarrhalis. Both RV replication (ρ = 0.86, P = 0.0004) (Figure 2D) and cytotoxicity (ρ = 0.72, P = 0.007) (Figure 2E) were positively correlated with cell-associated M. catarrhalis. These findings suggest that RV replication promotes M. catarrhalis attachment or persistence. It is of note that of the four BEC donors that we analyzed, two of them (denoted by circle and squares), had greater bacterial burden with RV co-infection than the other donors. These donors also had more RV replication and RV-induced cytotoxicity. These observations suggest that some individuals may be more susceptible to M. catarrhalis colonization during RV infection.
Figure 2
Cellular response to M. catarrhalis
We next tested whether RV and/or M. catarrhalis infection influenced epithelial gene expression. Using principal component analysis (PCA), PC1 was related to RV infection and PC5 was related to M. catarrhalis infection (Figure 3A). RV induced a robust transcriptional response (5143 mRNAs), while M. catarrhalis alone upregulated only 15 mRNAs. There were no significant differences in gene expression between cells infected with RV vs. RV+MC (Figure 3B). Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis of significantly expressed genes revealed that RV induced a number of innate immune and antiviral pathways. Figure 3C shows the top 10 enriched pathways for each treatment. M. catarrhalis downregulated the expression of 15 genes that are associated with chemotaxis and cell proliferation. Among them were the transcription factors early growth response (EGR) 1, 2, and 3, which are involved in mitogenesis and fibrinogenesis suggesting that M. catarrhalis could inhibit epithelial regeneration.
Figure 3
We next tested whether M. catarrhalis altered the epithelial immune responses to RV. RV-A16 infection alone significantly increased secretion of chemokines (CXCL5, CXCL10, eotaxin-3, and G-CSF) and proinflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α). RV-A16 infection also led to the secretion of TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) which activates cell death by binding to the TRAIL receptor (
Effects of RV species and bacterial isolate on cell-associated M. catarrhalis
RV-A and RV-C cause more severe respiratory illness and are more often associated with increased detection of M. catarrhalis in vivo compared to RV-B (
Figure 4

RV-A and RV-C, but not RV-B, cause increased adherence of M. catarrhalis. Differentiated cell cultures from two epithelial cell donors were infected with two representative types from each RV species (A16, A35, B52, B72, C2 and C15) (A–C) followed by the addition of M. catarrhalis strain MC14. After co-infection the following parameters were measured: (A) Adherent M. catarrhalis in cell lysate (P vs. uninfected control [“MC”]), (B) RV replication (P value vs B72), and (C) cytotoxicity (P vs. uninfected control [“MC-/RV-”]). Bars represent geometric mean ± SD. Results are from 3 independent experiments (ordinary one-way ANOVA; *P < 0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001, ****P<0.0001). (D) Following infection with RV-C15, four strains of M. catarrhalis (MC14, RSM43, RSM163, and 035E) were added to the culture. After co-infection, quantitative PCR was used to quantify the cell-associated M. catarrhalis. Bars represent geometric means ± SD (n = minimum of 3 per strain; unpaired t-test).
To identify the factors that contribute most to M. catarrhalis cell association, we used a mixed-effects model that included RV species, RV replication, epithelial cell donor, and cytotoxicity. In this model M. catarrhalis cell association was significantly related to RV species (C > A > B, P = 0.003) and RV replication (P = 0.05).
Moraxella catarrhalis adheres to epithelial cells infected with RV
As we were able to show that RV-C species had the greatest effect on M. catarrhalis cell association and epithelial outcomes such as cytotoxicity, we used RV-C15 as a representative to look at the timeline of infection. To determine how soon M. catarrhalis binds to RV-infected cells, we infected ALI cultures with RV-C15 for 16 h (approximately one replication cycle) and then added M. catarrhalis for 2-36 h. Moraxella catarrhalis had increased cell adhesion starting 2 h post-infection and persisting for at least 36 h post-infection (Figure 5A). As M. catarrhalis showed maximal adhesion at 8 h after infection, we used this time point to evaluate conditions affecting bacterial adhesion in subsequent experiments.
We next used immunohistochemistry to visualize M. catarrhalis-cellular interactions. Cells were infected with RV-C15 for 16 h and then incubated with M. catarrhalis for 8 h. Without RV infection, few bacteria adhered to the epithelium. In contrast, M. catarrhalis attached to the apical surface of RV-infected cells, particularly cells that stained positive for RV and that were extruded from the infected epithelium and are dying (Figures 5B, C). While M. catarrhalis has been reported to internalize into lung epithelial cell lines and primary cells by macropinocytosis (
Figure 5

M. catarrhalis adheres to epithelial cells undergoing cell death due to RV-C15 infection. (A) ALI cultures were infected with RV-C15 (16 hours) and then with M. catarrhalis MC14. Live CFU counts were obtained by plating dilutions of apical washes taken after incubation with M. catarrhalis for 2, 8, 16, 24, and 36 hours. Symbols represent geometric mean ± SD (n = 4; multiple unpaired t-tests. For (B, C), differentiated epithelial cell cultures were infected with RV-C15 (16 hours), M. catarrhalis MC14 (8 hours), or sequentially with RV-C15 (16 hours) followed by M. catarrhalis (8 hours). Representative histological sections were imaged (M. catarrhalis, red; RV-C15, green; DNA, blue) using an (B) 20✕ and a (C) 100✕ silicone immersion objective (n = 4; scale bar = 10 μm). (D) Intensity analysis of red (R = UspA) and green (G = VP1) signals from histological sections obtained in (B). Bars represent geometric mean ± SD (n = 4, ****P < 0.0001).
UspA is involved in the adhesion of M. catarrhalis to the respiratory epithelium
M. catarrhalis contains several OMPs that are important for adhesion. These include lipooligosaccharide (
Figure 6

UspA1 and UspA2 contribute to the adhesion of M. catarrhalis to BECs To evaluate RV-induced CEACAM1 expression in AECs, differentiated ALI cultures (A) from four epithelial cell donors were infected with RV-A16 for 2 hours and then with M. catarrhalis MC14 for 48 hours. Cell donors are represented by different symbols, and expression is relative to donor 1 (circles) (n = 2 per donor; unpaired t-test test). (B) ALI cultures from donor 1 were infected with RV species (A16, A35, B52, B72, C2 and C15) for 2 hours and then with M. catarrhalis MC14 for 48 hours. CEACAM1 expression was evaluated by qPCR. For (C) ALI cultures were infected with RV-C15 for 16 hours and then with M. catarrhalis. CEACAM1 expression was evaluated at 2, 8, 16, 24, and 36 hours following M. catarrhalis infection (n = 4, multiple unpaired t-tests). (D) Following RV-C15 infection for 16 hours, ALI cultures were incubated with mouse anti-pan CEACAM antibodies for 1 hour before adding M. catarrhalis MC14 for 8 hours. Cell-associated M. catarrhalis were quantified by qPCR. Bars represent geometric mean ± SD (n = 4, unpaired t-test). (E)M. catarrhalis strain MC14 was incubated with mouse anti-UspA antibodies for 1 hour and the mixture was added onto the apical surface of the epithelium for 8 or 24 hours following RV-C15 infection. Cell-associated M. catarrhalis was quantified by qPCR. White bars = no antibodies, black bars = anti-UspA antibodies, grey bars = isotype control (Iso). Bars represent geometric mean ± geometric SD (n = 4; unpaired t-test). *P < 0.05, **P<0.01, ****P<0.0001.
Discussion
Using a fully differentiated in vitro model of the human airway epithelium, we demonstrated that M. catarrhalis, an opportunistic pathogen of the human respiratory tract, was well tolerated and did not cause epithelial damage (Figure 1). During co-infection with RV-A or RV-C, there was a significant increase in cell-associated M. catarrhalis (Figures 2, 4). This suggests that the increased replication rates for RV-A and RV-C compared to RV-B species leads to more epithelial damage which supports the cell association of M. catarrhalis (
Our observations are consistent with other studies showing that viral infections can induce the adhesion of bacterial pathogens. Respiratory syncytial virus infection increases the virulence of S. pneumoniae by directly binding to bacteria and upregulating genes required for virus binding and bacterial invasiveness (
We observed that M. catarrhalis formed clusters around dying cells on the apical surface of the epithelium and in cell debris in the mucin layer (Figure 6). Therefore, it is possible that cellular damage also leads to the release of nutrients providing an environment conducive for M. catarrhalis growth as seen in the GI tract, where colonocytes undergoing apoptosis release small molecules that are a source of nutrition for bacterial growth, a process known as death-induced nutrient release (
Upper airway colonization with M. catarrhalis is widespread in healthy preschool children (
Our study’s main strength was the co-infection model using fully differentiated respiratory epithelium, providing a multicellular model of the cellular responses to bacterial and viral infection. We also tested multiple types of RV and different strains of M. catarrhalis to understand their similarities and differences. The RV were all cloned from clinical isolates, and three of the four M. catarrhalis strains used in the study were isolated from clinical samples to mimic conditions in vivo. Our study also has limitations that should be considered in interpreting these results. The small number of cell donors in our study limited the power to explore individual variability. Second, multicellular models containing epithelial and immune cells are needed to test the effects of M. catarrhalis adhesion on leukocyte-mediated inflammation. Although we did not observe an epithelial cytokine response to M. catarrhalis infection, RV infection recruits neutrophils and other leukocytes into the airway. It is possible that interactions between epithelial cells, adherent bacteria and neutrophils could amplify inflammatory responses at the epithelial surface to increase the severity of illness. In this study we only looked at a possible interaction between CEACAM and UspA proteins. It is possible that use of polyclonal blocking antibodies instead of monoclonal antibodies as used in this study, may give better blockage of the bacterial binding epitopes of CEACAM. We have not looked at possible interactions between other OMPs and extracellular matrix proteins and therefore cannot exclude the possibility that these proteins may play a role in RV-induced cell association of M. catarrhalis.
In conclusion, our study revealed that M. catarrhalis increases association with respiratory epithelial cells during RV infection by adhering to infected cells and those extruded from the epithelial surface. These findings suggest that virus-induced cell death promotes adherence and survival of this common bacterial pathogen. The lack of M. catarrhalis-induced inflammation or cytotoxicity further suggests that this bacterium could intensify the severity of viral illness by focusing leukocyte-mediated inflammation at the epithelial surface. This suggests a possible mechanism by which RV and M. catarrhalis co-infection increases the severity of respiratory illness in children.
Methods
Bacteria and viruses
Moraxella catarrhalis strain MC14 was isolated from a clinical specimen by the University of Wisconsin Clinical Pathology Laboratory. In addition, M. catarrhalis strains RSM43 and RSM163 were isolated from the nasal secretions of children with acute respiratory illnesses (
RV strains were cloned from clinical isolates and grown as described previously (
Isolation of genomic DNA from M. catarrhalis isolates
Moraxella catarrhalis was cultured overnight in 3 ml brain-heart-infusion (BHI) broth at 37 °C. The cultures were centrifuged at 21,130 × g for 5 min at ambient temperature and washed in 1 ml of Buffer 1 (150 mM NaCl, 10 mM EDTA, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8). The cells were resuspended in 1 mL of fresh Buffer 1 with 10 µL of 100 mg/mL RNase A and 163 µl of 10% [wt/vol] SDS. The samples were incubated at 37 °C for 90 min. Subsequently, 20 µl of 20 mg/ml proteinase K were added and the samples were incubated at 65 °C for 20 min. After an additional incubation at 37 °C for 16 h to ensure complete lysis, genomic DNA was purified using standard phenol-chloroform extraction and precipitated with isopropanol. Genomic libraries for Illumina MiSeq 2×150-bp paired-end sequencing were prepared and sequenced by the University of Wisconsin-Madison Biotechnology Center. The raw reads were corrected using fastp 0.20.0 (
Culture of airway epithelium at air-liquid interface
Human bronchial and tracheal epithelial cells were obtained from residual tissue from lungs destined for transplantation in collaboration with the University of Wisconsin - Health Lung Transplant Program. The protocol was reviewed by the University of Wisconsin Institutional Review Board and was deemed “not human subjects research.” Cryopreserved aliquots of cells were thawed and expanded as monolayers in PneumaCult-Ex Plus Medium (StemCell Technologies) supplemented with 0.1% [vol/vol] gentamicin (Sigma) and 0.1% [vol/vol] fluconazole (Novaplus). Once the cells reached 80% confluence, they were transferred to 12-well plates with Transwell semi-permeable inserts (Corning 3460) and were allowed to differentiate in PneumaCult-ALI medium (StemCell Technologies) supplemented with 0.1% [vol/vol] gentamicin (Sigma) and 0.1% [vol/vol] fluconazole (Novaplus) at the air-liquid interface for at least 21 days when ciliary motion was observed. The culture medium was changed to an antibiotic-free medium containing 0.05% [vol/vol] hydrocortisone 48 hours prior to RV infection. All ALI cultures were used between 28 – 35 days of air lifting.
RV and M. catarrhalis infection of epithelial cultures
The apical surface of the epithelium was washed with pre-warmed phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) supplemented with 100 mg/l of Ca2+ and Mg2+and then infected with 107 PFU of RV (in 50 μl of antibiotic-free culture medium) at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 10. The cells were incubated at 34 °C for 2 h, after which the apical surface was washed (3×) with pre-warmed PBS (containing Ca2+ and Mg2+). For infection of differentiated cultures, 3-4 colonies of M. catarrhalis were picked from the growth plates and used to make a bacterial suspension in pre-warmed PBS at a concentration of 2 McFarland units (~6×108 CFU/ml). The apical surface was then infected with 50 μl of the M. catarrhalis suspension (~3×107 CFU) and incubated at 37 °C for 48 h.
For time-course experiments in Figure 1A, differentiated respiratory epithelium was infected with 107 PFU of RV-A16 at 34 °C for 2 h and then with 3×107 CFU of M. catarrhalis. At specified timepoints after M. catarrhalis infection, the apical surface was washed with 0.5 ml of pre-warmed PBS (with Ca2+ and Mg2+) and cell lysates were collected in 350 µl RLT Plus Buffer from AllPrep DNA/RNA Mini Kit (Qiagen) containing 0.5% [vol/vol] Reagent DX (Qiagen) for quantitative PCR. To quantify cell associated live bacteria in Figure 5A, ALI cultures were infected with 107 PFU of RV-C15 at 34 °C for 2 h and then for at 37 °C for a further 16 h before infecting with 3×107 CFU of M. catarrhalis for specified durations. The apical surface washed with 0.5 ml of pre-warmed PBS (with Ca2+ and Mg2+). Cell associated bacteria were quantified by adding 100 μl of 1% [vol/vol] saponin on to the apical epithelial surface at RT for 15 min, washing with 0.5 ml of warmed PBS (with Ca2+ and Mg2+) and plating the serially diluted washes on chocolate agar. The colony counts were done 48 h after plating.
For trans-epithelial electrical resistance (TEER) measurements, the apical surface of ALI cultures were infected with 50 μl of the M. catarrhalis suspension (~3×107 CFU) that was prepared as described earlier and incubated at 37 °C for 24 or 48 h. As a control, a clinical isolate of Staphylococcus aureus was cultured from a frozen glycerol stock onto blood agar plates that were incubated at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 environment for 48 h. Bacteria were re-streaked onto fresh blood agar plates and cultured for a further 24 h. For infection of ALI cultures, a colony of S. aureus was picked from the growth plates and used to make a bacterial suspension in pre-warmed PBS at a concentration of 2 McFarland units (~6×108 CFU/ml). The apical surface of the ALI cultures were then infected with 50 μl of the suspension (~3×107 CFU) and incubated at 37 °C for 24 or 48 h.
Gentamycin protection assay for quantification of intracellular M. catarrhalis
The apical surface of the epithelium was washed with pre-warmed phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) supplemented with 100 mg/l of Ca2+ and Mg2+and then infected with 107 PFU of RV (in 50 μl of antibiotic-free culture medium) at an MOI of 10. The cells were incubated at 34 °C for 2 h, after which the apical surface was washed (3×) with pre-warmed PBS (containing Ca2+ and Mg2+). For infection of differentiated cultures, 3-4 colonies of M. catarrhalis were picked from the growth plates and used to make a bacterial suspension in pre-warmed PBS at a concentration of 2 McFarland units (~6×108 CFU/ml). The suspension was diluted 100-fold to obtain a suspension with a concentration of 6×106 CFU/ml. The apical surface was then infected with 50 μl of the 6×106 CFU/ml M. catarrhalis suspension (~3×105 CFU) and incubated at 37 °C for 48 h. Following the incubation period, the apical surface was washed with 0.5 ml of pre-warmed PBS and 100 µl of 100 µg/ml of gentamicin was added to the apical surface and incubated at 37 °C for 1 hour. The apical surface was washed with 0.5 ml of pre-warmed PBS and 100 µl of 1% saponin was added to the apical surface for 15 minutes at room temperature. The apical surface was washed again with 0.5 ml of pre-warmed PBS and serial dilutions of the washes were plated to determine live intracellular CFU counts.
TEER measurement
Culture medium in outer wells of the Transwell plate were removed and replaced with 1 ml of warmed DMEM/F12 medium (Gibco) and 0.5 ml of DMEM/F12 in the insert (on apical surface of cells). The cells and medium were allowed to incubate at RT for 15 min. The TEER was measured using an epithelial Voltohmmeter (EVOM2; World Precision Instruments, USA).
Quantitative PCR
Nucleic acids from the epithelium (± bacteria) were harvested from the inserts using 350 µl RLT Plus Buffer from AllPrep DNA/RNA Mini Kit (Qiagen) containing 0.5% [vol/vol] Reagent DX (Qiagen). The lysate was transferred to PowerBead tubes (Qiagen) for bead beating (5 min, 50 oscillations/s, Qiagen TissueLyser LT). RNA and DNA were extracted as separate fractions (AllPrep® DNA/RNA Mini Kit). Moraxella catarrhalis copB and RV RNA levels were quantified by real-time PCR using specific primers (Table 1) as previously described (
Table 1
| Name | Sequence 5’ ➔ 3’ | Description |
|---|---|---|
| RV1A16 | CCTCCGGCCCCTGAAT | RV |
| R848 | AAACACGGACACCCAAAGTAGT | RV |
| UspA1-F | AGGGATCCAACGACGGTCCAAGA TGG | UspA1 |
| UspA1-R | AGGGATCCCCTGCCACCTAAAGCCTTG | UspA1 |
| UspA2-F | CGGGATCCCTTCTCCCC CTAAAAATCGCTG | UspA2 |
| UspA2-R | AGGGATCCCGCTGTATGCCGCTAC TCGCAGCT | UspA2 |
| copB-F | GTGAGTGCCGCTTTACAACC | copB |
| copB-R | TGTATCGCCTGCCAAGACAA | copB |
| copB probe | NED-TGCTTTTGCAGCTGTTAGCCAGCCTAA-MGB-NFQ | copB |
| CEACAM1-F | TGCTCTGATAGCAGTAGCCCT | CEACAM1 |
| CEACAM1-R | TGCCGGTCTTCCCGAAATG | CEACAM1 |
| PPIA-F | CCCACCGTGTTCTTCGACATT | PPIA |
| PPIA-R | GGACCCGTATGCTTTAGGATGA | PPIA |
Primers and probes used in the study.
For the quantification of mRNA expression, cDNA was prepared from total RNA extracted from ALI culture lysates using TaqMan™ Reverse Transcription Reagents (Applied Biosystems). CEACAM1 mRNA expression was measured using specific primers (PrimerBank ID 329112546c1). UspA1 and UspA2 expression were quantified using specific primers as described previously (
Gene expression analysis
RNA was converted to cDNA using the SMART-Seq v4 Ultra Low Input RNA kit for sequencing (Takara Bio cat. 634898). Standard library preparation was completed using the Illumina Nextera XT DNA Library Preparation Kit and library quality and concentration were assessed using an Agilent 2100 bioanalyzer. Indexed samples were pooled and sequenced on the Illumina Hi-Seq 4000 with 100 base-pair, paired-end sequencing to a minimum of 10 million mapped reads per sample. RNA-seq reads were mapped to genome assembly GRCh37(hg19) reference sequence using STAR (version 2.6.1) (
Cytotoxicity measurement
Cellular cytotoxicity was estimated by measuring extracellular lactate dehydrogenase using a CytoTox 96® Non-Radioactive Cytotoxicity Assay, (Promega) following manufacturer’s instructions.
Cellular responses to infection
The cytokine levels in the culture medium in the basal compartment of the ALI culture system were measured by multiplex ELISA using a MILLIPLEX MAP 10-plex Human Cytokine/TH17 Mag Kit (Millipore Sigma). Epithelial cell gene expression was assessed by using 2×150 bp paired-end NovaSeq platform at the University of Wisconsin – Madison Biotechnology Center’s Gene Expression Center Core Facility (Madison, WI) (Research Resource Identifier – RRID : SCR_017757) for RNA library preparation and the DNA Sequencing Facility (RRID : SCR_017759) for sequencing.
Gene enrichment analysis of differentially expressed genes was done using the ShinyGO 0.76 online software (
Blocking cellular or bacterial surface proteins
To block UspA1 and A2, we incubated 50 μl of a 2 McFarland unit M. catarrhalis suspension (~3×107 CFU) with an equal volume of undiluted culture supernatant from the mouse hybridoma 17C7 (ATCC HB-11093) (
To block CEACAM, airway epithelial cells were infected with RV-C15 for 16 h. After washing with 0.5 ml of pre-warmed PBS, mouse anti-pan CEACAM antibody D14HD11 (ab4567, Abcam; 100 μl of 100 ng/ml) or of rat monoclonal anti-CEACAM antibody YTH71.3 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology; 100ul of 100 ng/ml) was added to the apical surface and incubated at 37 °C for 2 h. We washed the cells three times and then incubated them with 50 μl of a 2 McFarland unit M. catarrhalis (~3×107 CFU, 37 °C, 8 h or 24 h).
Immunohistochemistry
Mature ALI cultures were fixed in 10% [vol/vol] neutral-buffered formalin, embedded in paraffin wax and sectioned. The sections were deparaffinized by heating (60 °C, 20 min) and then transferring to 3 changes of xylenes. The sections were rehydrated using graded ethanol solutions (100%, 95%, 80%, 70% and 50% [vol/vol]) and deionized water. Antigen retrieval was performed by heating at 80 °C in a water bath for 2.5 h. Sections were permeabilized (1% normal goat serum with 0.4% [vol/vol] Triton X-100, 5 min), blocked (PBS with 0.1%[vol/vol] Tween 20 and 5% [vol/vol] goat serum), and then incubated (overnight, 4 °C) with antibodies to RV-C15 VP1 (1:200) or mouse anti-pan CEACAM antibody D14HD11 (ab4567, Abcam) (1:2000) diluted in 1% [vol/vol] normal goat serum containing 0.1% [vol/vol] Tween 20. After washing (PBS with 0.1% [vol/vol] Tween 20, 5 min), sections were incubated with the secondary antibody (Alexa Fluor® 488 goat anti-mouse), blocked for 1 h with 5% mouse serum in PBS, and incubated with the primary antibody to M. catarrhalis UspA (
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism v.9.3.1 (GraphPad Software, Inc). Student’s ordinary t-test or the Mann-Whitney test were used to compare two groups. When more than two groups were compared, ordinary one-way ANOVA was used for the analysis. Correlation coefficients were calculated using Spearman’s rho statistic. To identify factors that significantly predict M. catarrhalis cell association, linear regression modeling with random slope and random intercept using SAS procedure Mixed was conducted. The likelihood ratio test (LRT) was used to for model selection. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. SAS software (v.9.4, SAS Institute, Cary, NC) was used to develop the mixed-effects model.
Statements
Data availability statement
The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The name of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: PRJNA875903.
Author contributions
JG, RB-S and ED conceived the study. ED and RB-S planned and conducted experiments. RS provided clinical bacterial isolates and performed bacterial whole genome sequencing. YB provided virus preparations. BH and CO planned and performed epithelial gene expression studies and analysis. CK, TM, and CC provided guidance on study design, experimental methods and data interpretation. ED, RB-S, and ZZ performed statistical analysis. All authors contributed to the final draft of the manuscript and approved the final version. ED and RB-S contributed equally to this study.
Funding
This work was funded by the National Institutes of Health Centers of Excellence for Translational Research (U19 AI142720). This work was also partially funded by NIH grants R01 AI19641 (TM) and UL1 TR001412 to the University at Buffalo.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Surgery, Histology Core Lab, Dr. Susan Thibeault Ph.D., CCC-SLP, PI of the DOS Histology Core, along with certified Histotechnician, Sierra Raglin HTL (ASCP), and Lab Supervisor, Sara Dutton Sackett, Ph.D. for their assistance with immunohistochemistry, Lance Rodenkirch of the University of Wisconsin-Madison Imaging Core and Evdokia Menelaou, Ph.D. of Nikon Instruments Inc. for assistance with confocal imaging.
Conflict of interest
JG has received fees from AstraZeneca and Meissa Vaccines Inc. and has stock options in Meissa Vaccines Inc. outside of the current work.
The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcimb.2022.1060748/full#supplementary-material
Abbreviations
AEC, Airway epithelial cells; ALI, Air-liquid interface; CCL26, Chemokine ligand 26; CEACAM, Carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule; CEA, Carcinoembryonic antigen; CFU, Colony-forming unit; CFUe, Colony-forming unit equivalent; CXCL, C-X-C motif chemokine ligand; EGR, Early growth response; G-CSF, Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; IFN, Interferon; IL, Interleukin; LOS, Lipooligosaccharide; OMP, Outer membrane protein; PFU, Plaque forming unit; PFUe, Plaque forming unit equivalent; RV, Rhinovirus; TEER, Trans-epithelial electrical resistance; TNF-α, Tumor necrosis factor-alpha; TRAIL, TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand; Usp, Ubiquitous surface protein.
References
1
AebiC.MaciverI.LatimerJ. L.CopeL. D.StevensM. K.ThomasS. E.et al. (1997). A protective epitope of moraxella catarrhalis is encoded by two different genes. Infect. Immun.65, 4367–4377. doi: 10.1128/iai.65.11.4367-4377.1997
2
AlexanderE. H.HudsonM. C. (2001). Factors influencing the internalization of staphylococcus aureus and impacts on the course of infections in humans. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.56, 361–366. doi: 10.1007/s002530100703
3
AlnahasS.HagnerS.RaiferH.KilicA.GasteigerG.MuttersR.et al. (2017). IL-17 and TNF-α are key mediators of. Front. Immunol.8, 1562. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01562
4
AndersonC. J.MedinaC. B.BarronB. J.KarvelyteL.AaesT. L.LambertzI.et al. (2021). Microbes exploit death-induced nutrient release by gut epithelial cells. Nature596, 262–267. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03785-9
5
AsmatT. M.AgarwalV.SalehM.HammerschmidtS. (2014). Endocytosis of streptococcus pneumoniae via the polymeric immunoglobulin receptor of epithelial cells relies on clathrin and caveolin dependent mechanisms. Int. J. Med. Microbiol.304, 1233–1246. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2014.10.001
6
AvadhanulaV.RodriguezC. A.DevincenzoJ. P.WangY.WebbyR. J.UlettG. C.et al. (2006). Respiratory viruses augment the adhesion of bacterial pathogens to respiratory epithelium in a viral species- and cell type-dependent manner. J. Virol.80, 1629–1636. doi: 10.1128/JVI.80.4.1629-1636.2006
7
BalderR.KrunkoskyT. M.NguyenC. Q.FeezelL.LafontaineE. R. (2009). Hag mediates adherence of moraxella catarrhalis to ciliated human airway cells. Infect. Immun.77, 4597–4608. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00212-09
8
BashirH.GrindleK.VrtisR.VangF.KangT.SalazarL.et al. (2018). Association of rhinovirus species with common cold and asthma symptoms and bacterial pathogens. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.141, 822–824.e829. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.09.027
9
BizzintinoJ.LeeW. M.LaingI. A.VangF.PappasT.ZhangG.et al. (2011). Association between human rhinovirus c and severity of acute asthma in children. Eur. Respir. J.37, 1037–1042. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00092410
10
BochkovY. A.PalmenbergA. C.LeeW. M.RatheJ. A.AminevaS. P.SunX.et al. (2011). Molecular modeling, organ culture and reverse genetics for a newly identified human rhinovirus c. Nat. Med.17, 627–632. doi: 10.1038/nm.2358
11
BullardB.LipskiS. L.LafontaineE. R. (2005). Hag directly mediates the adherence of moraxella catarrhalis to human middle ear cells. Infect. Immun.73, 5127–5136. doi: 10.1128/IAI.73.8.5127-5136.2005
12
ChenS.ZhouY.ChenY.GuJ. (2018). Fastp: An ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics34, i884–i890. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty560
13
ConnersR.HillD. J.BorodinaE.AgnewC.DaniellS. J.BurtonN. M.et al. (2008). The moraxella adhesin UspA1 binds to its human CEACAM1 receptor by a deformable trimeric coiled-coil. EMBO J.27, 1779–1789. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2008.101
14
de Steenhuijsen PitersW. A. A.WatsonR. L.de KoffE. M.HasratR.ArpK.ChuM. L. J. N.et al. (2022). Early-life viral infections are associated with disadvantageous immune and microbiota profiles and recurrent respiratory infections. Nat. Microbiol.7, 224–237. doi: 10.1038/s41564-021-01043-2
15
DobinA.DavisC. A.SchlesingerF.DrenkowJ.ZaleskiC.JhaS.et al. (2013). STAR: Ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics29, 15–21. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635
16
FølsgaardN. V.SchjørringS.ChawesB. L.RasmussenM. A.KrogfeltK. A.BrixS.et al. (2013). Pathogenic bacteria colonizing the airways in asymptomatic neonates stimulates topical inflammatory mediator release. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.187, 589–595. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201207-1297OC
17
GeS. X.JungD.YaoR. (2020). ShinyGO: A graphical gene-set enrichment tool for animals and plants. Bioinformatics36, 2628–2629. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz931
18
GirkinJ. L.HatchwellL. M.CollisonA. M.StarkeyM. R.HansbroP. M.YagitaH.et al. (2017). TRAIL signaling is proinflammatory and proviral in a murine model of rhinovirus 1B infection. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol.312, L89–L99. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00200.2016
19
GreenL. R.MonkP. N.PartridgeL. J.MorrisP.GorringeA. R.ReadR. C. (2011). Cooperative role for tetraspanins in adhesin-mediated attachment of bacterial species to human epithelial cells. Infect. Immun.79, 2241–2249. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01354-10
20
GreinerO.DayP. J.AltweggM.NadalD. (2003). Quantitative detection of moraxella catarrhalis in nasopharyngeal secretions by real-time PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol.41, 1386–1390. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.4.1386-1390.2003
21
HelminenM. E.MaciverI.LatimerJ. L.Klesney-TaitJ.CopeL. D.ParisM.et al. (1994). A large, antigenically conserved protein on the surface of moraxella catarrhalis is a target for protective antibodies. J. Infect. Dis.170, 867–872. doi: 10.1093/infdis/170.4.867
22
HillD. J.EdwardsA. M.RoweH. A.VirjiM. (2005). Carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule (CEACAM)-binding recombinant polypeptide confers protection against infection by respiratory and urogenital pathogens. Mol. Microbiol.55, 1515–1527. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04487.x
23
HillD. J.VirjiM. (2003). A novel cell-binding mechanism of moraxella catarrhalis ubiquitous surface protein UspA: Specific targeting of the n-domain of carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecules by UspA1. Mol. Microbiol.48, 117–129. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03433.x
24
HochbergY.BenjaminiY. (1990). More powerful procedures for multiple significance testing. Stat. Med.9, 811–818. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780090710
25
KlaileE.KlassertT. E.ScheffrahnI.MüllerM. M.HeinrichA.HeylK. A.et al. (2013). Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)-related cell adhesion molecules are co-expressed in the human lung and their expression can be modulated in bronchial epithelial cells by non-typable haemophilus influenzae, moraxella catarrhalis, TLR3, and type I and II interferons. Respir. Res.14, 85. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-14-85
26
KloepferK. M.LeeW. M.PappasT. E.KangT. J.VrtisR. F.EvansM. D.et al. (2014). Detection of pathogenic bacteria during rhinovirus infection is associated with increased respiratory symptoms and asthma exacerbations. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.133, 1301–1307, 1307.e1301-1303. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.02.030
27
LafontaineE. R.CopeL. D.AebiC.LatimerJ. L.McCrackenG. H.Jr.HansenE. J. (2000). The UspA1 protein and a second type of UspA2 protein mediate adherence of moraxella catarrhalis to human epithelial cells in vitro. J. Bacteriol182, 1364–1373. doi: 10.1128/JB.182.5.1364-1373.2000
28
LafontaineE. R.WagnerN. J.HansenE. J. (2001). Expression of the moraxella catarrhalis UspA1 protein undergoes phase variation and is regulated at the transcriptional level. J. Bacteriol183, 1540–1551. doi: 10.1128/JB.183.5.1540-1551.2001
29
LawC. W.ChenY.ShiW.SmythG. K. (2014). Voom: Precision weights unlock linear model analysis tools for RNA-seq read counts. Genome Biol.15, R29. doi: 10.1186/gb-2014-15-2-r29
30
LeeW. M.LemanskeR. F.EvansM. D.VangF.PappasT.GangnonR.et al. (2012). Human rhinovirus species and season of infection determine illness severity. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.186, 886–891. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201202-0330OC
31
LooiK.BuckleyA. G.RigbyP. J.GarrattL. W.IosifidisT.ZoskyG. R.et al. (2018). Effects of human rhinovirus on epithelial barrier integrity and function in children with asthma. Clin. Exp. Allergy48, 513–524. doi: 10.1111/cea.13097
32
MatsuokaY.EndoK.KawamuraY.YoshidaT.SagaT.WatanabeY.et al. (1990). Normal bronchial mucus contains high levels of cancer-associated antigens, CA125, CA19-9, and carcinoembryonic antigen. Cancer65, 506–510. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19900201)65:3<506::AID-CNCR2820650322>3.0.CO;2-0
33
MeierP. S.TrollerR.GriveaI. N.SyrogiannopoulosG. A.AebiC. (2002). The outer membrane proteins UspA1 and UspA2 of moraxella catarrhalis are highly conserved in nasopharyngeal isolates from young children. Vaccine20, 1754–1760. doi: 10.1016/S0264-410X(02)00030-0
34
MurphyT. F.BrauerA. L.SchiffmacherA. T.SethiS. (2004). Persistent colonization by haemophilus influenzae in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.170, 266–272. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200403-354OC
35
NakagomeK.BochkovY. A.AshrafS.Brockman-SchneiderR. A.EvansM. D.PasicT. R.et al. (2014). Effects of rhinovirus species on viral replication and cytokine production. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.134, 332–341. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.01.029
36
PrjibelskiA.AntipovD.MeleshkoD.LapidusA.KorobeynikovA.. (2020). Using SPAdes de novo assembler. Current Protocols in Bioinformatics70, e102. doi: 10.1002/cpbi.102
37
RobinsonM. D.OshlackA. (2010). A scaling normalization method for differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data. Genome Biol.11, R25. doi: 10.1186/gb-2010-11-3-r25
38
RoweH. M.MeliopoulosV. A.IversonA.BommeP.Schultz-CherryS.RoschJ. W. (2019). Direct interactions with influenza promote bacterial adherence during respiratory infections. Nat. Microbiol.4, 1328–1336. doi: 10.1038/s41564-019-0447-0
39
SajjanU. S.JiaY.NewcombD. C.BentleyJ. K.LukacsN. W.LiPumaJ. J.et al. (2006). H. influenzae potentiates airway epithelial cell responses to rhinovirus by increasing ICAM-1 and TLR3 expression. FASEB J.20, 2121–2123. doi: 10.1096/fj.06-5806fje
40
SinghB.Alvarado-KristenssonM.JohanssonM.HallgrenO.Westergren-ThorssonG.MörgelinM.et al. (2016). The respiratory pathogen moraxella catarrhalis targets collagen for maximal adherence to host tissues. mBio7, e00066. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00066-16
41
SinghB.BlomA. M.UnalC.NilsonB.MörgelinM.RiesbeckK. (2010). Vitronectin binds to the head region of moraxella catarrhalis ubiquitous surface protein A2 and confers complement-inhibitory activity. Mol. Microbiol.75, 1426–1444. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07066.x
42
SlevogtH.SeyboldJ.TiwariK. N.HockeA. C.JonatatC.DietelS.et al. (2007). Moraxella catarrhalis is internalized in respiratory epithelial cells by a trigger-like mechanism and initiates a TLR2- and partly NOD1-dependent inflammatory immune response. Cell Microbiol.9, 694–707. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2006.00821.x
43
SmithC. M.SandriniS.DattaS.FreestoneP.ShafeeqS.RadhakrishnanP.et al. (2014). Respiratory syncytial virus increases the virulence of streptococcus pneumoniae by binding to penicillin binding protein 1a. a new paradigm in respiratory infection. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.190, 196–207. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201311-2110OC
44
SpaniolV.HeinigerN.TrollerR.AebiC. (2008). Outer membrane protein UspA1 and lipooligosaccharide are involved in invasion of human epithelial cells by moraxella catarrhalis. Microbes Infect.10, 3–11. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2007.09.014
45
SunK.MetzgerD. W. (2008). Inhibition of pulmonary antibacterial defense by interferon-gamma during recovery from influenza infection. Nat. Med.14, 558–564. doi: 10.1038/nm1765
46
TanT. T.ForsgrenA.RiesbeckK. (2006). The respiratory pathogen moraxella catarrhalis binds to laminin via ubiquitous surface proteins A1 and A2. J. Infect. Dis.194, 493–497. doi: 10.1086/505581
47
TanT. T.NordströmT.ForsgrenA.RiesbeckK. (2005). The respiratory pathogen moraxella catarrhalis adheres to epithelial cells by interacting with fibronectin through ubiquitous surface proteins A1 and A2. J. Infect. Dis.192, 1029–1038. doi: 10.1086/432759
48
UnhanandM.MaciverI.RamiloO.Arencibia-MirelesO.ArgyleJ. C.McCrackenG. H.et al. (1992). Pulmonary clearance of moraxella catarrhalis in an animal model. J. Infect. Dis.165, 644–650. doi: 10.1093/infdis/165.4.644
49
VerhaeghS. J. C.SnippeM. L.LevyF.VerbrughH. A.JaddoeV. W. V.HofmanA.et al. (2011). Colonization of healthy children by moraxella catarrhalis is characterized by genotype heterogeneity, virulence gene diversity and co-colonization with haemophilus influenzae. Microbiol. (Reading)157, 169–178. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.042929-0
50
VirjiM.EvansD.GriffithJ.HillD.SerinoL.HadfieldA.et al. (2000). Carcinoembryonic antigens are targeted by diverse strains of typable and non-typable haemophilus influenzae. Mol. Microbiol.36, 784–795. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.01885.x
51
WangJ.Gray-OwenS. D.KnorreA.MeyerT. F.DehioC. (1998). Opa binding to cellular CD66 receptors mediates the transcellular traversal of neisseria gonorrhoeae across polarized T84 epithelial cell monolayers. Mol. Microbiol.30, 657–671. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.01102.x
52
WangJ. H.KwonH. J.JangY. J. (2009). Rhinovirus enhances various bacterial adhesions to nasal epithelial cells simultaneously. Laryngoscope119, 1406–1411. doi: 10.1002/lary.20498
53
WangX.SeedB. (2003). A PCR primer bank for quantitative gene expression analysis. Nucleic Acids Res.31, e154. doi: 10.1093/nar/gng154
Summary
Keywords
Moraxella catarrhalis, rhinovirus, airway epithelium, co-infection, asthma
Citation
Dissanayake E, Brockman-Schneider RA, Stubbendieck RM, Helling BA, Zhang Z, Bochkov YA, Kirkham C, Murphy TF, Ober C, Currie CR and Gern JE (2023) Rhinovirus increases Moraxella catarrhalis adhesion to the respiratory epithelium. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 12:1060748. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.1060748
Received
03 October 2022
Accepted
28 November 2022
Published
17 January 2023
Volume
12 - 2022
Edited by
Brian J. Akerley, University of Mississippi Medical Center, United States
Reviewed by
Kristian Riesbeck, Lund University, Sweden; Junkal Garmendia, Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), Spain
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2023 Dissanayake, Brockman-Schneider, Stubbendieck, Helling, Zhang, Bochkov, Kirkham, Murphy, Ober, Currie and Gern.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Eishika Dissanayake, eishika.dissanayake@wisc.edu
‡These authors have contributed equally to this work
†Present address: Reed M. Stubbendieck, Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, United States
This article was submitted to Bacteria and Host, a section of the journal Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.