ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol., 04 April 2022

Sec. Clinical and Diagnostic Microbiology and Immunology

Volume 12 - 2022 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2022.796656

Clinical Characteristics of Bloodstream Infection in Immunosuppressed Patients: A 5-Year Retrospective Cohort Study

  • 1. Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Ruijin Hospital Affiliated Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China

  • 2. Institute of Respiratory Diseases, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China

  • 3. Institute of Respiratory Diseases, People’s Hospital of Fuyang City, Fuyang, China

  • 4. Department of Pharmacy, Ruijin Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China

  • 5. Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Poudre D’Or Chest Hospital, Rivière du Rempart, Mauritius

  • 6. Department of Laboratory Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China

Article metrics

View details

8

Citations

3,9k

Views

1,6k

Downloads

Abstract

Introduction:

Immunosuppressed patients with bloodstream infection are at risk of mortality. Our objective was to assess the independent risk factors of bloodstream infection with mortality in immunosuppressive states.

Methods:

The medical data of a total of 896 patients who were hospitalized in our hospital were collected from January 2015 to December 2019. Evaluation of the independent risk factors of mortality was done by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses.

Results:

Of the 896 immunosuppressed patients with bloodstream infection, 698 had over 60-day survivals and 198 had 60-day mortality. In our study, PCT (mean ±; standard: 11.40 ±; 31.89 µg/l vs. 62.45 ±; 17.10 µg/l, p = 0.007) and presence of age >60 years (40% vs. 14.19%, p = 0.001) were significantly different between situations with and without 60-day survivals in both univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Age >60 years and PCT could be used as indicators for bloodstream infection with 60-day death in immunosuppressive states; the OR (95% CI) were 1.532 (1.099–2.135) and 2.063 (1.413–3.013), respectively. In different subgroups, PCT and age were also independent risk factors of blood system diseases, Klebsiella pneumoniae infection, diabetes, and ICU-stay subgroups.

Conclusions:

Age and PCT were independently associated with mortality in immunosuppressive states, which may help to identify the highly risky situation of bloodstream infection in immunosuppressive states.

1 Introduction

Immunosuppressive (IS) status refers to low immune response. Generally, typical immunosuppressive status includes patients with hematological diseases, tumor, oral immunosuppressive medications, solid-organ transplant, stem cell transplant, or bone marrow transplant, and atypical immunosuppressive status includes patients with diabetes mellitus, liver cirrhosis, and burns (Mylotte and Tayara, 2000; Li et al., 2021; Willis et al., 2021). Studies revealed that immunosuppression could result from critical surgery as well (Si et al., 2021), and sometimes postoperative patients are susceptible to infections caused by opportunistic pathogens (Mada et al., 2020; Shipman et al., 2021). IS patients with infections may present with atypical signs and symptoms. Consequently, there is possibly a delay in diagnosis and treatment resulting in a poor prognosis of IS patients (Turkkan et al., 2021). IS status is closely related to mortality, and IS is associated with diverse pathogens including infection with bacteria, fungi, and viruses (McCann et al., 2004; Lindell et al., 2020; Li et al., 2021). Moreover, the clinical manifestations lack specificity. Thus, some indicators are needed to evaluate the clinical outcome. Previous investigations revealed that indicators like procalcitonin (PCT), age, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, malignancy, resistant bacterial infection, stroke, sex, diabetes mellitus, chronic renal failure, and previous use of antibiotics could indicate a poor prognosis of bloodstream infection (Zhang et al., 2019; Blanchard et al., 2020; Barlas et al., 2021; Chen et al., 2021; Jain et al., 2021; Zduniak et al., 2021).

IS status is a biologically feasible and widely acknowledged risk factor for mortality in patients with bloodstream infection, but the relationship between IS status and mortality in cases of bloodstream infection remains unclear. To our knowledge, there is no study assessing the significant predictors of mortality in bloodstream infection in patients with IS status.

To assess the clinical characteristics and the importance of risk factors related with mortality and to provide predictors of mortality in bloodstream infection associated with IS status, a retrospective analysis of all the cases of confirmed bloodstream infections in our hospital was conducted.

2 Materials and Methods

2.1 Subjects

The aims of this retrospective study were to evaluate the clinical characteristics in IS patients with organ tumor, hematological diseases, transplantation, autoimmune diseases on immunosuppressive therapy, diabetes, liver cirrhosis, postsurgery critical illness, and burns. We evaluated the prognostic risk factors not only in IS status but also in different IS subgroups.

Blood infections referred to various pathogenic microorganisms invading the blood, which could be confirmed by blood cultures. Coagulase-negative Staphylococci were considered real pathogens when isolated by multiple blood cultures. In our study, PCT was collected at the onset of infection. Body mass index (BMI) was recorded at hospitalization. In Results, the first values and corresponding percentages referred to the number and proportion (%) of different subgroups (primary diseases, etiologies, etc.) in the 60-day survival group. The second values and corresponding percentages referred to the number and proportion (%) of different subgroups (primary diseases, etiologies, etc.) in the 60-day death group. The precipitating factors referred to factors that caused bloodstream infections. The complications referred to the dysfunctions in other parts after bloodstream infection based on primary disease. The etiology resources with bloodstream infection referred to the primary sites of infection. Acute respiratory failure referred to the development of acute respiratory failure during the bacteremic event. Shock included septic shock, hypovolemic shock, and cardiogenic shock.

2.2 Measurements

To conduct this research, we compiled clinical data of 896 IS patients admitted in Ruijin Hospital from January 2015 to December 2019 who developed bloodstream infections during their hospital stay.

Patients meeting any of the following criteria for immunosuppression were selected: (1) tumor (organ and blood system); (2) solid-organ, stem cell, or bone marrow transplantation states; (3) autoimmune diseases with immunosuppressive therapy (more than 10 mg of prednisone or equivalent per day for at least 3 weeks or oral methotrexate, cyclosporine, azathioprine, or biological modifiers within 3 months); (4) poor diabetes control; (5) liver cirrhosis; (6) postoperative critical condition; and (7) burns (McCann et al., 2004; Blanchard et al., 2020; Lindell et al., 2020; Mada et al., 2020; Barlas et al., 2021; Turkkan et al., 2021).

2.3 Statistical Analysis

Patients were classified into 60-day mortality and 60-day survival, and data were analyzed according to different prognosis and different subgroups (underlying tumors, organ transplant, receiving long-term immunosuppressive treatment, diabetes mellitus, liver cirrhosis, postoperative critical condition, and burns). The clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of bloodstream infection for each of these groups were analyzed by using SPSS version 26.0. The proportions of IS-bloodstream infection in 60-day survival and 60-day mortality were compared by applying the χ2 test. The clinical factors associated with 60-day mortality in IS-bloodstream infection patients were evaluated by using univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses. Body mass index (BMI), age, and PCT were analyzed as continuous variables. The χ2 test or Fisher exact test was used to access the categorical variables, and the Student t-test was applied to evaluate continuous variables. A two-sided p value <0.05 was statistically significantly.

2.4 Statement of Ethics Compliance

All analyses were based on previous clinical data and the study obtained ethical clearance from Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine Ethics Committee with approval of patient informed consent exemption.

3 Results

3.1 The General Characteristics of the Study Population

896 IS patients were selected for analysis of their clinical data in this study. They were categorized as 60-day survivors (698 patients) and of 60-day death (198 patients). The general characteristics are summarized in Supplementary Table 1 and Figure 1. Approximately 71.21% (141/198) of the 60-day death patients were men with a mean ±; standard deviation age of 62.45 ±; 17.10 years, BMI of 23.54 ±; 3.97 kg/m2, and PCT of 20.49 ±; 43.59 µg/l; age and PCT were higher than those of 60-day survivors (p < 0.05). There was no difference in the sex, BMI, smoking, drinking, ICU stay, and underlying diseases between the two groups.

Figure 1

3.2 The Underlying Conditions With Bloodstream Infection Mortality in IS Status

The underlying conditions were liver cirrhosis (3.89% vs. 5.05%), acute myocardial infarction (2.01% vs. 4.54%), acute pancreatitis (8.02% vs. 6.57%), rheumatic heart disease (5.18% vs. 4.04%), infective endocarditis (2.29% vs. 3.53%), valvular heart disease (2.29% vs. 2.52%), rheumatic systemic diseases (1.58% vs. 1.01%), skin disease (1.00% vs. 2.52%), burns (6.59% vs. 5.56%), biliary infection (5.73% vs. 2.52%), aortic dissection (2.72% vs. 3.53%), aortic aneurysm (1.82% vs. 0.50%), and tumors (36.82% vs. 40.91%) (Supplementary Table 2 and Figure 1). Patients with tumors included patients with different malignancies: hematological malignancies (34.24% vs. 35.80%), gastrointestinal cancer (52.92% vs. 51.85%), respiratory system tumors (3.89% vs. 4.94%), peritoneal malignant tumor (4.28% vs. 3.70%), and urinary system tumors (3.11% vs. 2.47%). There was no difference in the underlying disease between the two groups (Supplementary Table 3).

3.3 The Precipitating Factors, Complications, and Etiology Resources With Bloodstream Infection Mortality in IS Status

The precipitating factors for bloodstream infections in patients with IS status were mainly surgery (47.42% vs. 51.01%), chemotherapy (8.17% vs. 9.60%), and burns (6.59% vs. 5.56%). The complications were mainly acute renal failure (13.18% vs. 11.11%), abdominal infection (9.17% vs. 9.09%), acute respiratory failure (25.64% vs. 21.72%), and shock (24.93% vs. 20.20%). The sources of infection were mainly the respiratory tract (11.75% vs. 11.11%), digestive tract (27.65% vs. 32.32%), and skin (9.46% vs. 8.59%). There was no difference in the precipitating factors, complications, and sources of infection between the two groups (Supplementary Table 4 and Figures 1, 2).

Figure 2

3.4 The Etiology of Bloodstream Infections in IS Status

The pathogens isolated in the patients were mainly Klebsiella pneumoniae (20.06% vs. 24.24%), Escherichia coli (17.05% vs. 12.53%), Staphylococcus aureus (10.17% vs. 9.09%), and Staphylococcus epidermidis (8.88% vs. 7.07%). There was no difference in the infectious microorganisms between the two groups (Supplementary Table 4 and Figure 3).

Figure 3

3.5 Antibacterial Therapy in IS Status

The antibiotics were mainly third-generation cephalosporins (19.20% vs. 15.15%), carbapenems (60.74% vs. 71.72%), vancomycin (28.37% vs. 33.84%), linezolid (15.04% vs. 14.14%), and fluoroquinolones (13.18% vs. 9.60%). There was no difference in the antibacterial therapy between the two groups (Supplementary Table 4 and Supplementary Figure 1).

3.5 Risk Factors Associated With 60-Day Mortality

The 60-day mortality was assessed by univariable logistic regression analysis, age >60 years (OR: 1.537, 95% CI: 1.102–2.145, p = 0.011) and PCT >0.5 µg/l (OR: 2.046, 95% CI: 1.400–2.991, p < 0.001) were considered as having significant differences. Using each significant item in the univariable logistic regression analysis, we assessed the risk factors associated with 60-day mortality by multivariable logistic regression analysis. Age >60 years (OR: 1.532, 95% CI: 1.099–2.135, p = 0.012) and PCT >0.5 µg/l (OR: 2.063, 95% CI: 1.413–3.013, p < 0.001) were considered as having significant differences. Therefore, age >60 years and PCT >0.5 µg/l were independent risk factors for 60-day mortality (Table 1).

Table 1

Variable (total = 896)Univariate analysisMultivariate analysis
OR (95% CI)p valueOR (95% CI)p value
Age >60 years1.537 (1.102–2.145)0.0111.532 (1.099–2.135)0.012
PCT >0.5 µg/l2.046 (1.400–2.991)p < 0.0012.063 (1.413–3.013)p < 0.001
Acute myocardial infarction2.271 (0.950–5.428)0.065Not ApplicableNot Applicable

Univariate and multivariate analyses of factors related to over 60-day mortality in immunosuppressed patients.

3.6 Risk Factors Associated With 60-Day Mortality in Different Subgroups

3.6.1 Hematological Disease Subgroup

The analysis results of univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses showed that age >70 years (OR: 3.920, 95% CI: 1.490–10.312, p = 0.006), PCT >0.5 µg/l (OR: 3.608, 95% CI: 1.050–12.395, p = 0.042) and bacteria resistant to extended spectrum cephalosporins (OR: 4.597, 95% CI: 1.647–12.832, p = 0.004) were independent risk factors for 60-day mortality (Table 2 and Supplementary Figure 2).

Table 2

Hematological disease subgroup
Variable (total = 117)Univariate analysisMultivariate analysis
OR (95% CI)p valueOR (95% CI)p value
Age >70 years3.214 (1.342–7.700)0.0093.920 (1.490–10.312)0.006
PCT >0.5 µg/l3.750 (1.199–11.729)0.0233.608 (1.050–12.395)0.042
Bacteria resistant to extended spectrum cephalosporins3.731 (1.466–9.495)0.0064.597 (1.647–12.832)0.004
Shock subgroup
Variable (total = 214)Univariate analysisMultivariate analysis
OR (95% CI)p valueOR (95% CI)p value
Acute myocardial infarctionNot ApplicableNot Applicable9.556 (1.686–54.168)0.011
Diabetes subgroup
Variable (total = 239)Univariate analysisMultivariate analysis
OR (95% CI)p valueOR (95% CI)p value
Age >60 years2.084 (1.114–3.900)0.0222.105 (1.089–4.068)0.027
PCT >0.5 µg/l2.233 (1.105–4.512)0.0252.082 (1.005–4.313)0.048
Tumor1.886 (1.019–3.490)0.043Not Applicable0.069
SHL1.063 (1.018–1.109)0.0055.578 (1.059–31.296)0.043
ICU admission subgroup
Variable (total = 248)Univariate analysisMultivariate analysis
OR (95% CI)p valueOR (95% CI)p value
Female1.885 (1.063–3.342)0.030Not Applicable0.055
Age >60 years1.942 (1.145–3.291)0.0141.812 (1.043–3.148)0.035
Acute myocardial infarction7.243 (1.301–40.320)0.0248.007 (1.251–51.270)0.028
PCT >0.5 µg/l3.006 (1.578–5.727)0.0012.725 (1.402–5.296)0.003
Diabetes1.828 (1.051–3.178)0.0331.874 (1.043–3.366)0.036
ABA infection subgroup
Variable (total = 56)Univariate analysisMultivariate analysis
OR (95% CI)p valueOR (95% CI)p value
BurningNot ApplicableNot Applicable6.800 (1.690–27.356)0.007
KPN infection subgroup
Variable (total = 188)Univariate analysisMultivariate analysis
OR (95% CI)p valueOR (95% CI)p value
Female2.596 (1.079–6.249)0.033Not Applicable0.061
Age >60 years3.055 (1.508–6.190)0.0022.542 (1.226–5.268)0.012
PCT >0.5 µg/l3.140 (1.366–7.214)0.0072.731 (1.161–6.427)0.021
ECO infection subgroup
Variable (total = 56)Univariate analysisMultivariate analysis
OR (95% CI)p valueOR (95% CI)p value
PCT >0.5 µg/lNot ApplicableNot Applicable4.958 (1.405–17.489)0.013
Bacteria resistant to extended spectrum cephalosporin subgroup
Variable (total = 130)Univariate analysisMultivariate analysis
OR (95% CI)p valueOR (95% CI)p value
Chemotherapy3.077 (1.036–9.139)0.043Not Applicable0.946
Hematological diseases3.874 (1.508–9.958)0.0054.072 (1.008–16.448)0.049
Diabetes2.827 (1.141–7.005)0.0252.879 (1.119–7.407)0.028
Acute respiratory failure subgroup
Variable (total = 222)Univariate analysisMultivariate analysis
OR (95% CI)p valueOR (95% CI)p value
Age >45 years3.083 (1.042–9.120)0.0423.140 (1.039–9.4932)0.043
Acute myocardial infarction9.077 (1.605–51.324)0.0139.383 (1.589–55.392)0.004
Gram-positive bacterial infection with glycopeptide antibiotic treatment subgroup
Variable (total = 130)Univariate analysisMultivariate analysis
OR (95% CI)p valueOR (95% CI)p value
Rheumatic diseases8.806 (1.689–45.919)0.0107.735 (1.199–49.927)0.032
Shock8.276 (3.474–19.718)<0.0016.554 (2.495–17.212)<0.001
Acute myocardial infarction4.687 (1.059–20.739)0.042Not Applicable0.070
Acute renal failure4.550 (1.579–13.111)0.005Not Applicable0.466
PCT >0.5 µg/l2.531 (1.102–5.815)0.029Not Applicable0.375
Gram-negative bacterial infection with carbapenem antibiotic treatment subgroup
Variable (total = 313)Univariate analysisMultivariate analysis
OR (95% CI)p valueOR (95% CI)p value
PCT >0.5 µg/l3.137 (1.365–7.211)0.0073.141 (1.273–7.749)0.013
ICU-stay2.071 (1.189–3.606)0.010Not Applicable0.480
Burning2.701 (1.056–6.912)0.038Not Applicable0.696
Biliary infection2.544 (1.137–5.696)0.0233.699 (1.454–9.409)0.006
Shock5.676 (3.128–10.298)<0.0014.671 (2.328–9.374)<0.001
Acute renal failure2.502 (1.212–5.165)0.013Not Applicable0.296
Respiratory tract infection2.194 (1.076–4.474)0.031Not Applicable0.109
Skin infection2.628 (1.083–6.374)0.033Not Applicable0.470
Extended spectrum cephalosporin-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infection subgroups
Variable (total = 124)Univariate analysisMultivariate analysis
OR (95% CI)p valueOR (95% CI)p value
KPN2.565 (1.090–6.037)0.031Not Applicable0.392
Drinking4.286 (1.769–10.384)0.0014.273 (1.608–11.356)0.004
Abdominal infection4.720 (1.441–15.453)0.010Not Applicable0.180
Shock5.400 (2.145–13.594)<0.0013.701 (1.278–10.722)0.016
Hypoproteinemia3.750 (1.003–14.021)0.049Not Applicable0.087

Risk factors associated with 60-day mortality in different subgroups by univariate and multivariate analyses.

3.6.2 Shock Subgroup

The independent risk factor in shock was acute myocardial infarction (OR: 9.556, 95% CI: 1.686–54.168, p = 0.011) (Table 2 and Supplementary Figure 2).

3.6.3 Diabetes Subgroup

In the diabetes subgroup, the independent risk factors with 60-day mortality were age >60 years (OR: 2.105, 95% CI: 1.089–4.068, p = 0.027), PCT >0.5 µg/l (OR: 2.082, 95% CI: 1.005–4.313, p = 0.048, and Staphylococcus haemolyticus (SHL) infection (OR: 5.578, 95% CI: 1.059–31.296, p = 0.043) (Table 2 and Supplementary Figure 2).

3.6.4 ICU Admission Subgroup

In the ICU-stay subgroup, the independent risk factors with 60-day mortality were age >60 years (OR: 1.812, 95% CI: 1.043–3.148, p value = 0.035), acute myocardial infarction (OR: 8.007, 95% CI: 1.251–51.270, p = 0.028), PCT >0.5 µg/l (OR: 2.725, 95% CI: 1.402–5.296, p = 0.003), and diabetes (OR: 1.874, 95% CI: 1.043–3.366, p = 0.036) (Table 2 and Supplementary Figure 2).

3.6.5 The Assessment of Mortality Risk According to Etiologies

The independent risk factors in cases with ABA infection were burns (OR: 6.800, 95% CI: 1.690–27.356, p = 0.007) (Table 2 and Supplementary Figure 2).

The independent risk factors in cases with ECO infection were PCT >0.5 µg/l (OR: 4.958, 95% CI: 1.405–17.489, p = 0.013) (Table 2 and Supplementary Figure 2).

The independent risk factors in KPN infection associated with 60-day mortality were age >60 years (OR: 2.542, 95% CI: 1.226–5.268, p = 0.012) and PCT >0.5 µg/l (OR: 2.731, 95% CI: 1.161–6.427, p = 0.021) (Table 2 and Supplementary Figure 2).

In the extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant bacteria subgroup, the independent risk factors with 60-day mortality were hematological diseases (OR: 4.072, 95% CI: 1.008–16.448, p = 0.049) and diabetes (OR: 2.879, 95% CI: 1.119–7.407, p = 0.028) (Table 2 and Supplementary Figure 2).

3.6.6 Acute Respiratory Failure Subgroup

In the acute respiratory failure subgroup, the independent risk factors with 60-day mortality were age >45 years (OR: 3.140, 95% CI: 1.039–9.493, p = 0.043) and acute myocardial infarction (OR: 9.383, 95% CI: 1.589–55.392, p = 0.004) (Table 2 and Supplementary Figure 2).

3.6.7 Gram-Negative Bacterial Infection With Carbapenem Antibiotic Treatment, Gram-Positive Bacterial Infection With Glycopeptide Antibiotic Treatment, Extended Spectrum Cephalosporin-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacterial Infection Subgroup

In the gram-positive bacterial infection with glycopeptide antibiotic treatment subgroup, the independent risk factors with 60-day mortality were rheumatic diseases (OR: 7.735, 95% CI: 1.199–49.927, p = 0.032) and shock (OR: 6.554, 95% CI: 2.495–17.212, p < 0.001) (Table 2 and Supplementary Figure 2).

In the gram-negative bacterial infection with carbapenem antibiotic treatment subgroup, the independent risk factors with 60-day mortality were PCT >0.5 µg/l (OR: 3.141, 95% CI: 1.273–7.749, p = 0.013), biliary infection (OR: 3.699, 95% CI: 1.454–9.409, p = 0.006), shock (OR: 4.671, 95% CI: 2.328–9.374, <0.001) (Table 2 and Supplementary Figure 2).

In the extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant gram-negative bacterial infection subgroup, the independent risk factors with 60-day mortality were drinking (OR: 4.273, 95% CI: 1.608–11.356, p = 0.004) and shock (OR: 3.701, 95% CI: 1.278–10.722, p = 0.016) (Table 2 and Supplementary Figure 2).

4 Discussion

To our knowledge, many studies assessed risk factors for different microbial infections in the immunocompromised and specific microbial infection in different types of IS. However, studies investigating overall IS status associated with bloodstream infection are scarce. Our study explored the clinical characteristics in IS patients with organ tumor, hematological diseases, transplantation, autoimmune diseases on immunosuppressive therapy, diabetes, liver cirrhosis, postsurgery critical illness, and burns. We evaluated the prognostic risk factors not only in IS status but also in different IS subgroups. Age and PCT were independent prognostic risk factors for IS patients. In the analysis of 896 IS patients, we also evaluated the prognostic risks of different IS subgroups, especially for hematological diseases, diabetes, and ICU admission.

Bloodstream infection was a severe complication of hematological diseases, especially in the occurrence of resistant bacteria (Castagnola et al., 2021). Previous investigations also showed that age and PCT were associated with poor outcome in hematological diseases (Mylotte and Tayara, 2000; Arora and Sahni, 2018; Stoma et al., 2019; Chen et al., 2021; Levy et al., 2021). The results were consistent with our research results. In patients with hematological diseases, the independent risk factors were age >70 years, PCT >0.5 µg/l, and bacteria resistant to extended-spectrum cephalosporins.

Some studies found that hypoglycemia presented a higher mortality in patients with diabetes, and patients with uncontrolled diabetes and bloodstream infection had a poor prognosis (Blanchard et al., 2020). Age, PCT, and microbial infection were associated with a poor prognosis in patients with diabetes (Kanafani et al., 2009; Arora and Sahni, 2018). Our study had similar findings. In the analysis of the diabetes subgroup, the prognostic risk factors were age >60 years, PCT >0.5 µg/l, and SHL infection.

Bloodstream infection is associated with a high mortality in ICU (Lindell et al., 2020). IS patients easily suffered from multiple infections resulting in admission to ICU. Infectious complications contributed to the highly mortality in IS status (Barlas et al., 2021). In our study, the conclusion was the same as in previous studies: age, PCT, and diabetes could be independent factors for ICU admission (Fraunberger et al., 2006; Martin et al., 2006; Blanchard et al., 2020). Moreover, rare investigations analyzed the relationship between bloodstream infection and acute myocardial infarction. The current research mainly evaluated the outcome of acute myocardial injuries in COVID-19 (Fardman et al., 2021; Kite et al., 2021). Our study presented that acute myocardial infarction could be a prognostic predicator of ICU admission in IS status.

Previous investigations showed that the clinical prognosis had a close relationship with the patient’s immune status (McCann et al., 2004; Lindell et al., 2020). Many studies presented that different immunosuppressive status had different independent risk factors for prognosis. For example, in hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients with ICU stay, the independent risk factors were age, underlying diseases, ICU admission time, degree of severity of organ failure, several level of critical diseases, and primary disease (Castagnola et al., 2021). In the hematological malignancies’ patients with ABA infection, the independent risk factors were Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score and antibiotic therapy (Zduniak et al., 2021). In the solid-organ transplant recipients, the independent risk factors were infected bacteria resistant to extended-spectrum cephalosporins, age, and antifungal drugs (Anesi et al., 2021). In the patients with cancer, the independent risk factors were comorbidities, age, underlying diseases (mainly hematological malignancies), infection resources, types of microbial infections, hypoalbuminemia, antibiotic therapy, antibiotic-resistant organisms, shock, and ICU admission (Gudiol et al., 2011; Marín et al., 2015; Torres et al., 2015; Satlin et al., 2016; Marín et al., 2019; Martinez-Nadal et al., 2020; Gudiol et al., 2021). Many studies mainly showed the prognostic risk factors of an immunosuppressive disease in different types of microbial infections or a microbial infection in different types of IS; the prognostic predictors of mortality in overall bloodstream infection in IS status were unclear. In our study, we analyzed the prognostic factors in overall IS patients and different IS status subgroups; age >60 and PCT >0.5 µg/l had a closely relationship with 60-day mortality in IS status.

This study demonstrated a close association between PCT and poor prognosis in IS patients. PCT is an acute reaction protein; previous studies showed that it is closely related with the severity of acute infection (Jacobs et al., 2018). Several investigations presented that PCT could be an indicator in blood system diseases, tumor, oral immunosuppressive medications, solid-organ transplant, stem cell transplant or bone marrow transplant, and diabetes (Mylotte and Tayara, 2000; Kanafani et al., 2009; Arora and Sahni, 2018; Jacobs et al., 2018; Stoma et al., 2019; Chen et al., 2021). The conclusions were similar with our study in which PCT presented a poor prognostic predictor. In our study, PCT >0.5 µg/l could be an independent risk factor for 60-day mortality in IS patients (OR: 2.063, 95% CI: 1.413–3.013, p < 0.001). In different subgroups, PCT >0.5 µg/l was the independent risk factor for blood system diseases (OR: 3.608, 95% CI: 1.050–12.395, p = 0.042), ECO infection (OR: 4.958, 95% CI: 1.405–17.489, p = 0.013), KPN infection (OR: 2.731, 95% CI: 1.161–6.427, p = 0.021), diabetes (OR: 2.082, 95% CI: 1.005–4.313, p = 0.048), ICU hospitalization (OR: 2.725, 95% CI: 1.402–5.296, p = 0.003), and gram-negative bacterial infection with carbapenem antibiotic treatment (OR: 3.141, 95% CI: 1.273–7.749, p = 0.013).

The study also demonstrated that age suggested a poor prognosis in IS patients. Because of the decrease in immune system function with age, elderly people were more prone to infections (Zhang et al., 2019). Previous studies showed that age could be an indicator in severe infection (Martin et al., 2006). Our study showed identical results with a high mortality in the elderly. In our study, age >60 years could be an independent risk factor for 60-day mortality in IS patients (OR:1.532, 95% CI: 1.099–2.135, p = 0.012). In the analysis of different subgroups, age >60 years as a significant prognostic factor of KPN infection (OR: 2.542, 95% CI: 1.226–5.268, p = 0.012), diabetes (OR: 2.105, 95% CI: 1.089–4.068, p = 0.027), and ICU hospitalization (OR: 1.812, 95% CI: 1.043–3.148, p = 0.035) were evaluated.

Several limitations should be taken into consideration. Firstly, the clinical data were collected in a single center, the final results may not represent other different medical institutions. Secondly, the composition of primary illness was mainly hematological diseases and gastrointestinal cancer, it may produce data bias. Thirdly, some IS subgroups included a small number of patients, large-scale research may be needed in the future.

5 Conclusions

The clinical characteristics of underlying diseases and etiological features had a rare difference between 60-day mortality and 60-day survival. Age >60 years and PCT >0.5 µg/l as significant indicators for death risk of bloodstream infection in immunosuppressive status. In the analysis of IS subgroups, the prognostic risk factors of diabetes were age >60 years, PCT >0.5 µg/l, and SHL infection, and those of ICU admission were age >60 years, acute myocardial infarction, PCT >0.5 µg/l, and diabetes.

Funding

The present study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 8217010254); (No. 82170086), Shanghai Shenkang Hospital Development Center Clinical Science and Technology Innovation Project (SHDC12018102), Shanghai Municipal Key Clinical Specialty (shslczdzk02202), and Shanghai Key Laboratory of Emergency Prevention, Diagnosis and Treatment of Respiratory Infectious Diseases (20dz2261100).

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Statements

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine Ethics committee. Written informed consent for participation was not required for this study in accordance with the national legislation and the institutional requirements.

Author contributions

Conception and design of the work: YF and LN. Data interpretation: GS, JS. Collecting data: HL, LY, JF, YG, HZ, SZ. Data analysis: HL, LY, JF, JS. Drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content: HL, HS, YF. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcimb.2022.796656/full#supplementary-material

Supplementary Figure 1

Distribution of bloodstream infection according to 60-day survivals and 60-day death stratifications: different antibacterial therapy.

Supplementary Figure 2

Risk factors associated with 60-day mortality in different subgroups.

References

  • 1

    AnesiJ. A.LautenbachE.TammaP. D.ThomK. A.BlumbergE. A.AlbyK.et al. (2021). Risk Factors for Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacterales Bloodstream Infection Among Solid-Organ Transplant Recipients. Clin. Infect. Dis.72 (6), 953–960. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa190

  • 2

    AroraR.SahniN. (2018). Can Serum Procalcitonin Aid in the Diagnosis of Blood Stream Infection in Patients on Immunosuppressive Medications? Clin. Chim. Acta483, 204–208. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2018.05.002

  • 3

    BarlasT.İnciK.AygencelG.TürkoğluM.TunçcanÖ. G.CanF.et al. (2021). Infections in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Patients Admitted to Hematology Intensive Care Unit: A Single-Center Study. Hematology26 (1), 328–339. doi: 10.1080/16078454.2021

  • 4

    BlanchardF.CharbitJ.van der MeerschG.PopoffB.PicodA.CohenR.et al. (2020). Early Sepsis Markers in Patients Admitted to Intensive Care Unit With Moderate-to-Severe Diabetic Ketoacidosis. Ann. Intensive Care10 (1), 58. doi: 10.1186/s13613-020-00676-6

  • 5

    CastagnolaE.BagnascoF.MesiniA.AgyemanP. K. A.AmmannR. A.CarlesseF.et al. (2021). Antibiotic Resistant Bloodstream Infections in Pediatric Patients Receiving Chemotherapy or Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant: Factors Associated With Development of Resistance, Intensive Care Admission and Mortality. Antibiot. (Basel).10 (3), 266. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10030266

  • 6

    ChenL.HanX.LiY.LiM. (2021). Assessment of Mortality-Related Risk Factors and Effective Antimicrobial Regimens for Treatment of Bloodstream Infections Caused by Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.65 (9), e0069821. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00698-21

  • 7

    ChenJ.HuangJ.WangT.XieC. (2021). Analysis of the Relationship Between Serum Amyloid Protein A, Procalcitonin, C-Reactive Protein, and Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Infection in Patients With Malignant Tumor. Ann. Palliat. Med.10 (5), 5359–5365. doi: 10.21037/apm-21-796

  • 8

    FardmanA.ZahgerD.OrvinK.OrenD.KofmanN.MohsenJ.et al. (2021). Acute Myocardial Infarction in the Covid-19 Era: Incidence, Clinical Characteristics and in-Hospital Outcomes-A Multicenter Registry. PloS One16 (6), e0253524. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253524

  • 9

    FraunbergerP.WangY.HollerE.ParhoferK. G.NagelD.WalliA. K.et al. (2006). Prognostic Value of Interleukin 6, Procalcitonin, and C-Reactive Protein Levels in Intensive Care Unit Patients During First Increase of Fever. Shock26 (1), 10–12. doi: 10.1097/01.shk.0000215319.06866.bd

  • 10

    GudiolC.Albasanz-PuigA.CuervoG.CarratalàJ. (2021). Understanding and Managing Sepsis in Patients With Cancer in the Era of Antimicrobial Resistance. Front. Med. (Lausanne).8, 636547. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.636547

  • 11

    GudiolC.TubauF.CalatayudL.Garcia-VidalC.CisnalM.Sánchez-OrtegaI.et al. (2011). Bacteraemia Due to Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli in Cancer Patients: Risk Factors, Antibiotic Therapy and Outcomes. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.66 (3), 657–663. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkq494

  • 12

    JacobsL.BerrensZ.StensonE. K.ZackoffM.Danziger-IsakovL.LahniP.et al. (2018). Interleukin-27 as a Candidate Diagnostic Biomarker for Bacterial Infection in Immunocompromised Pediatric Patients. PloS One13 (11), e0207620. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207620

  • 13

    JainP.GaliyaA.Luke PhilipS.MatetiU. V.SupriyaP. S.GudiS. K.et al. (2021). Bacteriological Profile and Antimicrobial Resistance Pattern Among Patients With Sepsis: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Int. J. Clin. Pract.75 (10), e14701. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.14701

  • 14

    KanafaniZ. A.KouranyW. M.FowlerV. G.JrLevineD. P.ViglianiG. A.CampionM.et al. (2009). Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Diabetic Patients With Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia and Endocarditis. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.28 (12), 1477–1482. doi: 10.1007/s10096-009-0808-3

  • 15

    KiteT. A.LudmanP. F.GaleC. P.WuJ.CaixetaA.MansouratiJ.et al. (2021). International Prospective Registry of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients With COVID-19. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.77 (20), 2466–2476. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.03.309

  • 16

    LevyI.LaviA.ZimranE.GrisariuS.AumannS.ItchakiG.et al. (2021). COVID-19 Among Patients With Hematological Malignancies: A National Israeli Retrospective Analysis With Special Emphasis on Treatment and Outcome. Leuk. Lymphoma.18, 1–10. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2021.1966782

  • 17

    LiL.HsuS. H.WangC.LiB.SunL.ShiJ.et al. (2021). Characteristics of Viral Pneumonia in Non-HIV Immunocompromised and Immunocompetent Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study. BMC Infect. Dis.21 (1), 767. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06437-5

  • 18

    LindellR. B.NishisakiA.WeissS. L.TraynorD. M.FitzgeraldJ. C. (2020). Risk of Mortality in Immunocompromised Children With Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock. Crit. Care Med.48 (7), 1026–1033. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004329

  • 19

    MadaP. K.Saldaña KoppelD. A.Al ShaaraniM.Joel ChandranesanA. S. (2020). Primary Cutaneous Aspergillus Fumigatus Infection in Immunocompetent Host. BMJ Case Rep.13 (2), e233020. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2019-233020

  • 20

    MarínM.GudiolC.ArdanuyC.Garcia-VidalC.JimenezL.Domingo-DomenechE.et al. (2015). Factors Influencing Mortality in Neutropenic Patients With Haematologic Malignancies or Solid Tumours With Bloodstream Infection. Clin. Microbiol. Infect.21 (6), 583–590. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2015.01.029

  • 21

    MarínM.GudiolC.CastetF.OlivaM.PeiróI.Royo-CebrecosC.et al. (2019). Bloodstream Infection in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer: A Major Challenge in the Cetuximab Era. Clin. Transl. Oncol.21 (2), 187–196. doi: 10.1007/s12094-018-1905-5

  • 22

    Martinez-NadalG.Puerta-AlcaldeP.GudiolC.CardozoC.Albasanz-PuigA.MarcoF.et al. (2020). Inappropriate Empirical Antibiotic Treatment in High-Risk Neutropenic Patients With Bacteremia in the Era of Multidrug Resistance. Clin. Infect. Dis.70 (6), 1068–1074. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz319

  • 23

    MartinG. S.ManninoD. M.MossM. (2006). The Effect of Age on the Development and Outcome of Adult Sepsis. Crit. Care Med.34 (1), 15–21. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000194535.82812.ba

  • 24

    McCannS.ByrneJ. L.RoviraM.ShawP.RibaudP.SicaS.et al. (2004). Outbreaks of Infectious Diseases in Stem Cell Transplant Units: A Silent Cause of Death for Patients and Transplant Programmes. Bone Marrow. Transplant.33 (5), 519–529. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1704380

  • 25

    MylotteJ. M.TayaraA. (2000). Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia: Predictors of 30-Day Mortality in a Large Cohort. Clin. Infect. Dis.31 (5), 1170–1174. doi: 10.1086/317421

  • 26

    SatlinM. J.CohenN.MaK. C.GedrimaiteZ.SoaveR.AskinG.et al. (2016). Bacteremia Due to Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae in Neutropenic Patients With Hematologic Malignancies. J. Infect.73 (4), 336–345. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2016.07.002

  • 27

    ShipmanP.HighlandJ.WittB.AltJ. (2021). Non-Invasive Fungal Sinusitis as a Complication of a Steroid-Eluting Stent Following Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: A Case Report. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol.5, 34894211036844. doi: 10.1177/00034894211036844

  • 28

    SiX.JiG.MaS.XuY.ZhaoJ.ZhangY.et al. (2021). In-Situ-Sprayed Dual-Functional Immunotherapeutic Gel for Colorectal Cancer Postsurgical Treatment. Adv. Healthc. Mater.10 (20), e2100862. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202100862

  • 29

    StomaI.KarpovI.UssA.KrivenkoS.IskrovI.MilanovichN.et al. (2019). Combination of Sepsis Biomarkers May Indicate an Invasive Fungal Infection in Haematological Patients. Biomarkers24 (4), 401–406. doi: 10.1080/1354750X.2019.1600023

  • 30

    TorresV. B.AzevedoL. C.SilvaU. V.CarusoP.TorellyA. P.SilvaE.et al. (2015). Sepsis-Associated Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients With Malignancies. Ann. Am. Thorac. Soc.12 (8), 1185–1192. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201501-046OC

  • 31

    TurkkanS.BeyogluM. A.SahinM. F.YaziciogluA.Tezer TekceY.YekelerE. (2021). COVID-19 in Lung Transplant Recipients: A Single-Center Experience. Transpl. Infect. Dis.23 (5), e13700. doi: 10.1111/tid.13700

  • 32

    WillisM. L.MahungC.WalletS. M.BarnettA.CairnsB. A.ColemanL. G.Jret al. (2021). Plasma Extracellular Vesicles Released After Severe Burn Injury Modulate Macrophage Phenotype and Function. J. Leukoc. Biol. 111 (1), 33–49. doi: 10.1002/JLB.3MIA0321-150RR

  • 33

    ZduniakA.MihailescuS. D.LequesneJ.LenainP.ContentinN.PepinL. F.et al. (2021). Outcomes After Intensive Care Unit Admission in Newly Diagnosed Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Patients: A Real-Life Study. Eur. J. Haematol.106 (6), 788–799. doi: 10.1111/ejh.13606

  • 34

    ZhangJ.DuZ.BiJ.WuZ.LvY.ZhangX.et al. (2019). Comparison of Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Pyogenic Liver Abscess Patients < 65 Years of Age Versus ≥ 65 Years of Age. BMC Infect. Dis.19 (1), 233. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-3837-2

Summary

Keywords

bloodstream infection, different subgroups, mortality, immunosuppressive states, prognosis

Citation

Lin H, Yang L, Fang J, Gao Y, Zhu H, Zhang S, Summah HD, Shi G, Sun J, Ni L and Feng Y (2022) Clinical Characteristics of Bloodstream Infection in Immunosuppressed Patients: A 5-Year Retrospective Cohort Study. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 12:796656. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.796656

Received

17 October 2021

Accepted

07 March 2022

Published

04 April 2022

Volume

12 - 2022

Edited by

Alessandra Oliva, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy

Reviewed by

Alberto Antonelli, University of Florence, Italy; Yinggang Zhu, Fudan University, China

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Yun Feng, ; Lei Ni, ; Jingyong Sun,

†These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship

This article was submitted to Clinical Microbiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics