Eosinophilic esophagitis and esophageal microbiota

Abstract

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an antigen-mediated chronic inflammatory disease of the esophagus, the prevalence of which has steadily increased in recent years. The pathogenesis of EoE is not yet well-defined; however, recent studies have demonstrated that the esophageal microbiota is an essential regulator of physiological and pathological processes of EoE. Currently, research on EoE and microbiota is an emerging field of study that is receiving increasing attention. Here, we review existing EoE-related esophageal microbiota studies to explore the potential mechanisms underlying esophageal microbiota-mediated EoE. The esophageal microbiome is altered in patients with EoE. Although α diversity is usually not significantly different, an increase in Haemophilus and a decrease in Firmicutes were observed in EoE patients. The role of microbiota in initiating and perpetuating inflammation is not fully understood. Current evidence suggests that the penetration of microbiota leads to the activation of epithelial cells as well as innate and adaptive immune cells, with the subsequent release of cytokines, leading to immune responses and inflammation. The involvement of toll-like receptors in EoE also supports the potential role of the microbiota in the progression of this disease. While EoE-induced inflammation can also lead to alterations in the local microbiome. Moreover, dietary modifications, proton pump inhibitors, and corticosteroids can modulate the esophageal microbiota; however, definitive conclusions about the alterations of microbes after treatment cannot be drawn. These findings provide promising avenues for future studies.

1 Introduction

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by clinically significant esophageal dysfunctions (Choudhury and Baker, 2020), such as dysphagia, food impaction, vomiting, and abdominal pain, accompanied by atopic dermatitis, food allergy, asthma, and allergic rhinitis (Capucilli and Hill, 2019). Histopathological manifestations of EoE include intraepithelial eosinophilic infiltration (≥15/high magnification view) and esophageal epithelial remodeling, leading to esophageal stricture (Khokhar et al., 2022). The prevalence of EoE has steadily increased in recent years from 5–10/100,000 person-years to 20/100,000 person-years (Arias and Lucendo, 2020). A systematic review estimated the combined prevalence of EoE at 34.4 per 100,000 individuals, with higher prevalence in adults than in children (Navarro et al., 2019). EoE, the second most common chronic or recurrent esophageal disease after gastroesophageal reflux disease, is the leading cause of dysphagia and food impaction in children, adolescents, and young adults in Europe and North America affecting quality of life (Arias and Lucendo, 2019).

The pathogenesis of EoE is not well-defined and is currently thought to be the outcome of a confluence of genetic, environmental, and immunological factors. The esophageal epithelium of susceptible individuals with risk factors such as a history of antibiotic application early in life, genetic background, or atopic status, can release alarmin, IL-33, and thymic stromal lymphopoietin following antigenic stimulation. These cytokines stimulate the secretion of IL-13, IL-4, and IL-5 by T helper (Th2) cells, leading to the migration of eosinophils into the esophagus, disruption of esophageal mucosal barrier integrity, and eventual esophageal fibrosis in patients with EoE (Votto et al., 2020; Muir and Falk, 2021; Racca et al., 2021). Recently, the role of esophageal microbes in EoE has attracted attention. The development of 16S rRNA gene sequencing has been instrumental in investigation of the esophageal microbiota. Emerging studies suggest that patients with EoE may have a unique esophageal resident microbiome that interacts with the host to influence cellular activities and metabolic processes (Busing et al., 2021). However, whether alteration of the esophageal microbiota is a contributing factor, or the outcome of esophageal inflammation related to EoE remains controversial. Primary management of EoE includes dietary modifications, pharmacological drugs such as proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), and hormone therapy. The esophageal microbiota is altered in the pre- and post-treatment phases and may be an indicator of EoE therapeutic outcomes. This review integrates EoE-related esophageal microbiota studies conducted over the past decade to explore the potential clinical value of the esophageal microbiota as a biomarker, providing a foundation for further research and treatment of EoE.

2 Esophageal microbiota characteristics associated with EoE

Dysbiosis of the esophageal microbiota occurs in children and adults with EoE and is characterized by an increase in the abundance of Haemophilus and a decrease in that of Firmicutes compared to healthy controls (Tables 1, 2). Benitez et al. compared the esophageal bacteria between 33 children with EoE and 35 healthy controls. They found that the esophageal mucosa of children with EoE was dominated by Neisseria and Corynebacterium, whereas that of healthy children was dominated by Streptococcus and Atopobium (Benitez et al., 2015). They also analyzed and compared the α diversity of esophageal microbiota among children with EoE and healthy controls and found nonsignificant differences (Benitez et al., 2015; Parashette et al., 2022). Another study found that untreated children with EoE had a lower abundance of Firmicutes and a higher abundance of Haemophilus than healthy controls (Harris et al., 2015), which is consistent with Benitez’s second study on the microbiome of EoE (Benitez et al., 2021). Despite differences in taxa, conclusions drawn from the α diversity of the esophageal microbiota in adults with EoE have been consistent. A study that included 16 patients found that Firmicutes was more abundant in patients with inactive EoE, whereas Actinobacillus and Alloprevotella were abundant in adults with active EoE (Ghisa et al., 2020). Laserna-Mendieta and colleagues compared the esophageal microbiota of 30 patients with EoE and 10 healthy controls and found that the abundance of Porphyromonas and Parvimonas was lower in patients with EoE than in healthy individuals (Laserna-Mendieta et al., 2021). Smith et al. compared the esophageal microbiota of 6 untreated children with EoE with those of 18 healthy controls; however, they did not observe any significant differences in specific microbes in children with EoE (Smith et al., 2015). Similarly, a recent study found no significant alterations in adult patients with EoE (Johnson et al., 2021).

In addition to the bacterial microbiota, other microorganisms may also be associated with EoE. Benitez et al. compared esophageal fungi in 69 children with EoE and 10 healthy controls. Candida, Cladosporiaceae, and Malassezia were the fungal taxa commonly present in esophageal samples across all groups. However, Agaricomycetes, Candida, Cladosporiaceae, and Peniophora were primarily present in samples from healthy controls (Benitez et al., 2021). Ghisa et al. found Spirochetes in esophageal samples from patients with EoE for the first time, which were more abundant in active patients than in inactive patients (Ghisa et al., 2020). However, these findings have not been validated in other studies.

The microbiota of the esophagus and oral cavity are correlated, and the oral microbiota of children with EoE is similar to that of the esophagus (Angerami Almeida et al., 2022). Hiremath et al. compared the salivary microbiota of 26 children with EoE and 19 controls and found a higher relative abundance of Streptococcus in children with active EoE than in healthy controls. Haemophilus was more abundant in the saliva of children with active EoE than in the saliva of children with inactive EoE and was positively related to the disease activity score (Hiremath et al., 2019). Another study compared the oral microbiota of 29 patients with EoE to that of 20 healthy controls and found that salivary flora distinguished patients with EoE from healthy controls (Facchin et al., 2022). These findings suggest that saliva sampling may be an effective and non-invasive microbial sampling method for the esophagus.

Apart from 16s rRNA gene sequencing, some studies have clarified the changes in the esophageal microbiota in patients with EoE by bacterial cultivation and found that the diversity of esophageal bacteria in patients with EoE was significantly higher than that in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease, with Alfa-streptococci being the most abundant (Norder Grusell et al., 2018). However, current pediatric and adult esophageal microbiota studies rely on 16S gene sequencing, which has a limited sequencing depth. Traditional culture methods are limited to specific bacteria and may not facilitate comprehensive analysis. Moreover, some bacteria are difficult to identify in culture (Norder Grusell et al., 2018). Therefore, future studies should apply metagenomic sequencing combined with metabolomics to better describe the full genetic makeup and function of microbial communities in patients with EoE.

3 Potential microbial mechanisms involved in EoE

An impaired epithelial barrier plays an important role in the development of EoE, through which allergens and microbes activate innate and adaptive immune cells with the subsequent production of chemokines and cytokines, leading to Th2 immune responses (Simon et al., 2016). The use of antibiotics and PPIs early in life may alter esophageal microbiota colonization (Jensen and Dellon, 2018). Alterations in commensal bacterial populations can elevate IgE production, increase basophil recruitment, and activate Th2 cell response (Hill et al., 2012). Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are pattern recognition receptors that distinguish pathogens from commensal bacterial populations (Jiménez-Dalmaroni et al., 2016). TLRs are mainly expressed in epithelial and lamina propria cells; the former are believed to be at the center of EoE pathogenesis (Rochman et al., 2018). A previous study found a high esophageal bacterial load and overexpression of TLRs in patients with EoE, suggesting that the microbiota and its products may activate TLRs and increase the release of inflammatory factors from esophageal epithelial cells, resulting in the progression of EoE (Arias et al., 2018). Moreover, in early EoE, interactions between epithelial cells and esophageal microbiota may modulate CXCL16 expression and recruit invariant natural killer T cells, a major source of Th2 cytokines, to the esophageal epithelium (Arias and Lucendo, 2019). These findings suggest that dysbiosis of the esophageal microbiota may contribute to EoE (Figure 1). However, several studies have demonstrated dysbiosis of the esophageal microbiota as a consequence of EoE. Masterson et al. indicated that the expression of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α is inhibited in patients with active EoE, followed by the selective downregulation of the tight junction protein CLDN1, resulting in esophageal barrier dysfunction (Masterson et al., 2019). In addition, a decrease in hypoxia-inducible factor-1α also leads to decreased secretion of the antimicrobial peptide β-defensin by the epithelium (Kelly et al., 2013), finally resulting in an increased bacterial load (Angerami Almeida et al., 2022). Eosinophils that infiltrate the esophagus also secrete defensins that affect the local microbiome (Kanikowska et al., 2021).

Figure 1

The role of Helicobacter pylori in EoE remains controversial. Some studies have found that H. pylori promotes the expression of IFN-γ and IL-17, resulting in the proliferation of Th1 and Th17 cells, consequent downregulation of Th2 cells, and inhibition of the immune response, thus playing a protective role in EoE (Dowling et al., 2019). A series of observational studies have also shown an inverse association between H. pylori infection rates and EoE prevalence (Furuta et al., 2013; Doulberis et al., 2020). However, a recent large case-control study did not find evidence of a protective effect of H. pylori against EoE (Molina-Infante et al., 2018), suggesting that the relationship between reduced H. pylori infection and increased EoE prevalence is complex and noncausal (Talley and Walker, 2018).

4 Role of microbiota in EoE treatment

Dietary modifications and pharmacological drugs (including PPIs and corticosteroids) are currently the primary treatment options for EoE (Gonsalves and Aceves, 2020). Dietary modifications and pharmacological drugs can modulate the esophageal microbiota (Table 3), suggesting that the microbiota may be an important biomarker for predicting and evaluating therapeutic effects on EoE. Microbial interventions can also be used to manage EoE.

4.1 Dietary modification

The targeted elimination diet, six-food elimination diet (SFED), and elemental diet are currently used to treat EoE and have proven clinical efficacy. Kelly et al. demonstrated the therapeutic effect of dietary modification on EoE for the first time (Kelly et al., 1995). A retrospective study analyzed 31 adult patients with EoE who received a targeted elimination diet or SFED and found that symptoms and endoscopic appearance improved in 71% and 54% of patients, respectively (Wolf et al., 2014). It was found that the increased bacterial load in the esophagus normalized after SFED in adult patients with EoE (Arias et al., 2018). However, another study demonstrated that esophageal bacterial load in patients with EoE was not affected by dietary regulation (Harris et al., 2015). Benitez et al. found no significant differences in the esophageal microbiota after removing food(s) from SFED in patients with active EoE. However, the Granulicatella and Campylobacter genera were enriched in the esophageal microenvironment following the addition of highly allergenic foods to the diet of patients with inactive EoE (Benitez et al., 2015). A recent study demonstrated that α diversity decreased among patients with EoE who underwent a food elimination diet, and the abundance of Firmicutes slightly increased (Laserna-Mendieta et al., 2021).

4.2 Pharmacological drugs

4.2.1 Proton pump inhibitors

In recent years, with the proven clinical efficacy of PPIs the definition of EoE has been updated to include PPIs-responsive esophageal eosinophilia, in which symptoms and histology improve after PPIs treatment (Dellon et al., 2018). PPIs are widely accepted as first-line medications for EoE, with a 30% – 70% response rate (Gonsalves and Aceves, 2020). A multicenter observational study showed a 49% histological response rate and a 71% clinical response rate to PPIs treatment (Laserna-Mendieta et al., 2020). PPIs can affect the esophageal microbiota by altering the pH and microenvironment (Vesper et al., 2009). One study found that the abundance of Bacteroidetes and Fusobacteria decreased slightly from baseline after receiving PPIs, whereas that of Firmicutes increased in patients with EoE(Laserna-Mendieta et al., 2021). PPIs use was associated with a high abundance of Streptococcus, Corynebacterium, and Rothia. However, no evidence of PPIs-induced microbiome changes was found in children with EoE (Hiremath et al., 2019). Another study observed an increased abundance of Proteobacteria and Aggregatibacter and a decreased abundance of Streptococcus in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease treated with PPIs but not in patients with EoE (Harris et al., 2015).

4.2.2 Hormone therapy

Topical swallowed steroids, such as fluticasone propionate or budesonide, are currently among the most effective first-line therapies for children and adults with EoE. Corticosteroids inhibit IL-13 transcription in vivo, reduce eosinophilic and T cell infiltration, downregulate mast cell-related genes, decrease fibrosis, and restore esophageal motility (Racca et al., 2021). A previous study comparing the efficacies of topical and systemic corticosteroids demonstrated histological and clinical remission with both treatment methods. Systemic administration showed greater histological improvement than topical administration but no significant advantage in symptom resolution, relapse rates, or time to relapse (Schaefer et al., 2008). However, given the adverse effects, systemic administration is only used in patients with critical EoE and symptoms of severe dysphagia or significant weight loss (Dellon et al., 2013). One study found that corticosteroids did not change the diversity or microbiota abundance in children with EoE (Hiremath et al., 2019). Benitez et al. indicated that the relative abundance of Actinobacillus was lower in children treated with corticosteroids than in steroid-naïve populations. The relative abundance of Haemophilus was lower in active steroid non-responders than in children with active steroid-naïve EoE. The abundance of Candida significantly increased in children with inactive EoE treated with corticosteroids compared to that in untreated inactive EoE subjects, whereas Cladosporiaceae significantly increased in inactive steroid responders. Changes in esophageal microbiota were assessed in the same patient before and after corticosteroid therapy. The abundance of Actinobacillus decreased, which was consistent with a cross-sectional comparison, whereas there was no significant change in the relative abundance of Haemophilus or fungi (Benitez et al., 2021). Another study demonstrated that patients treated with corticosteroids had a decreased abundance of Firmicutes, a relatively high abundance of Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Fusobacteria, and a microbiota composition similar to that of controls. In addition, analysis of the predicted function indicated that the metabolism of sulphur groups, 4-aminobutanoate, ornithine/arginine, and cell peptidoglycan can be affected by microbial changes related to the treatment received. These alterations may be involved in the pathogenesis of EoE (Laserna-Mendieta et al., 2021).

4.2.3 Microbiota interventions

Microbiota modulators, including probiotics and prebiotics, can reshape or adjust microbiota composition to improve disease. The efficacy of probiotics has been demonstrated in various diseases related to microbiota dysbiosis, including antibiotic-associated diarrhea, inflammatory bowel disease, and irritable bowel syndrome (Kim et al., 2019). Potential mechanisms include inhibition of pathogenic bacterial adhesion, enhanced mucosal barrier function, modulation of innate and adaptive immune systems, secretion of bioactive metabolites, and regulation of the enteric and central nervous systems (Liu et al., 2018). The effectiveness of probiotics for the treatment of EoE has been explored in animal studies. In a mouse model of EoE, supplementation with Lactococcus lactis inhibited IL-5 production and reduced esophageal eosinophilic infiltration (Holvoet et al., 2013; Holvoet et al., 2016). In addition, Clostridia regulate intrinsic lymphocyte function and epithelial permeability to prevent allergen sensitization (Stefka et al., 2014), and the abundance of Clostridia is significantly reduced in the gut of patients with EoE (Kashyap et al., 2019), suggesting that it can be used as a potential intervention target. Although prebiotics can promote the growth of beneficial bacteria, there is currently a lack of research on their efficacy in treating EoE. Furthermore, fecal microbiota transplantation is used to treat several diseases as it restores the microbiota (Ooijevaar et al., 2019). It has been reported that fecal microbiota transplantation can restore the esophageal microbiota (Brusilovsky et al., 2022). Fecal microbiota transplantation may have therapeutic potential in EoE and corresponding preclinical and clinical studies could be instrumental in furthering treatment.

5 Discussion

In this review, we summarize the published EoE-related esophageal microbiota studies. The main findings showed that the esophageal microbiome was altered and was involved in the pathophysiology of EoE. The microbiome may serve as a potential therapeutic target. However, there are differences among the conclusions of various studies. Further research is required to investigate microbiota composition and role in EoE.

Currently, 16S rRNA sequencing is the most widely used sequencing method, providing an efficient and economical way to determine microbial community structure and composition. However, this method has the following drawbacks. First, there is no consensus on which variable region is the most suitable for microbiota identification in patients with EoE, and the difference leads to identification bias based on primers selection (Busing et al., 2021). There were significant differences in the selection of primers in the studies included in this review, which may be one of the reasons for the differences between study conclusions. Secondly, the species resolution achieved with 16S rRNA sequencing was lower than that achieved with metagenomic sequencing. The former usually cannot accurately identify the species or distinguish similar strains, leading to bias in microbiota identification. This method can only identify a microbial database based on short sequences (Angerami Almeida et al., 2022). Third, 16S rRNA sequencing cannot distinguish dead bacteria, which interfere with results (Norder Grusell et al., 2018). Finally, 16S rRNA sequencing tends to ignore information on fungi and viruses, resulting in limited conclusions. Metagenomics is better than 16S rRNA in terms of sequencing depth, which can compensate for some of the limitations of 16S rRNA (Angerami Almeida et al., 2022). However, metagenomic sequencing has not been used to identify the esophageal microbiota of patients with EoE. Moreover, little work has been conducted in metabolomics and metaproteomics, which may provide clues for identifying potential therapeutic targets and pathogenesis. Therefore, future studies should test metagenomic sequencing combined with metagenomics and metabolomics in the assessment of the genetic makeup and function of microbial communities.

However, different sampling sites may yield conflicting results. Enrichment of Neisseria was observed in esophageal biopsy samples from patients with EoE (Benitez et al., 2015), whereas an increased relative abundance of Neisseria was found in saliva samples taken from non-EoE controls (Hiremath et al., 2019). Several studies that used esophageal samples showed a decreased abundance of Bacteroidetes in patients with EoE (Smith et al., 2015; Benitez et al., 2021), whereas Kashyap et al. observed a significant increase in fecal samples of patients with EoE (Kashyap et al., 2019). Although saliva sampling is expected to be an effective and noninvasive microbial sampling method for the esophagus, esophageal biopsy remains the gold standard, and the relationship between the two needs to be further explored.

Studies have shown that all current first-line EoE therapies can affect the esophageal microbiota; however, definitive conclusions about the alterations of microbes after treatment cannot be drawn. This may be related to the small sample sizes and the short time between the last sampling time point and the end of treatment. Changes in the esophageal microbiota are expected to provide a new target for EoE treatment.

6 Conclusions

The esophageal microbiota is involved in the development and occurrence of EoE. Research on fluctuations in the esophageal microbiota and their effects on patients with EoE could help identify new therapeutic targets and improve patient prognosis. The esophageal microbiome is altered in patients with EoE compared to that in healthy controls, characterized by an increase in the abundance of Haemophilus and a decrease in that of Firmicutes. Moreover, EoE therapies can modulate the esophageal microbiota, and microbiota modulators are potential ways to cure EoE. However, studies on EoE-related esophageal microbiota are limited. Additionally, certain conclusions have not been validated by other studies, or conflicting results have been obtained. This may be due to small sample sizes or the interference of medications. Sequencing methods are also important in this regard. 16S rRNA sequencing has limited sequencing depth and has been used in most studies. Future studies should apply metagenomic sequencing to better describe full genetic makeup. In addition, there remain gaps in multi-omics studies. Little work has been done on metabolomics and metaproteomics, which may provide information on the function of a microbial community and give insight into potential biomarkers for noninvasive disease monitoring and therapeutic outcomes. In conclusion, the clinical value of esophageal microbiota in EoE remains to be explored.

References

• 1

  Angerami AlmeidaK.de Queiroz AndradeE.BurnsG.HoedtE. C.MattesJ.KeelyS.et al. (2022). The microbiota in eosinophilic esophagitis: A systematic review. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol.37 (9), 1673–1684. doi: 10.1111/jgh.15921

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 2

  AriasÁ.LucendoA. J. (2019). Molecular basis and cellular mechanisms of eosinophilic esophagitis for the clinical practice. Expert Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol.13 (2), 99–117. doi: 10.1080/17474124.2019.1546120

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 3

  AriasÁ.LucendoA. J. (2020). Epidemiology and risk factors for eosinophilic esophagitis: lessons for clinicians. Expert Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol.14 (11), 1069–1082. doi: 10.1080/17474124.2020.1806054

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 4

  AriasÁ.VicarioM.BernardoD.OlallaJ. M.ForteaM.Montalban-ArquesA.et al. (2018). Toll-like receptors-mediated pathways activate inflammatory responses in the esophageal mucosa of adult eosinophilic esophagitis. Clin. Transl. Gastroenterol.9 (4), 147. doi: 10.1038/s41424-018-0017-4

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 5

  BenitezA. J.HoffmannC.MuirA. B.DodsK. K.SpergelJ. M.BushmanF. D.et al. (2015). Inflammation-associated microbiota in pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis. Microbiome3, 23. doi: 10.1186/s40168-015-0085-6

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 6

  BenitezA. J.TanesC.MatteiL.HofstaedterC. E.KimD. K.GrossJ.et al. (2021). Effect of topical swallowed steroids on the bacterial and fungal esophageal microbiota in eosinophilic esophagitis. Allergy76 (5), 1549–1552. doi: 10.1111/all.14602

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 7

  BrusilovskyM.BaoR.RochmanM.KemterA. M.NaglerC. R.RothenbergM. E. (2022). Host-microbiota interactions in the esophagus during homeostasis and allergic inflammation. Gastroenterology162 (2), 521–534.e8. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.10.002

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 8

  BusingJ. D.BuendiaM.ChoksiY.HiremathG.DasS. R. (2021). Microbiome in eosinophilic esophagitis-metagenomic, metatranscriptomic, and metabolomic changes: A systematic review. Front. Physiol.12, 731034. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.731034

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 9

  CapucilliP.HillD. A. (2019). Allergic comorbidity in eosinophilic esophagitis: mechanistic relevance and clinical implications. Clin. Rev. Allergy Immunol.57 (1), 111–127. doi: 10.1007/s12016-019-08733-0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 10

  ChoudhuryS.BakerS. (2020). Eosinophilic esophagitis: the potential role of biologics in its treatment. Clin. Rev. Allergy Immunol.59 (2), 150–159. doi: 10.1007/s12016-019-08749-6

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 11

  DellonE. S.GonsalvesN.HiranoI.FurutaG. T.LiacourasC. A.KatzkaD. A. (2013). ACG clinical guideline: Evidenced based approach to the diagnosis and management of esophageal eosinophilia and eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Am. J. Gastroenterol.108 (5), 679–692. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.71

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 12

  DellonE. S.LiacourasC. A.Molina-InfanteJ.FurutaG. T.SpergelJ. M.ZevitN.et al. (2018). Updated international consensus diagnostic criteria for eosinophilic esophagitis: proceedings of the AGREE conference. Gastroenterology155 (4), 1022–1033.e10. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.07.009

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 13

  DoulberisM.KountourasJ.RoglerG. (2020). Reconsidering the “protective” hypothesis of Helicobacter pylori infection in eosinophilic esophagitis. Ann. N Y Acad. Sci.1481 (1), 59–71. doi: 10.1111/nyas.14449

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 14

  DowlingP. J.NeuhausH.PolkB. I. (2019). The role of the environment in eosinophilic esophagitis. Clin. Rev. Allergy Immunol.57 (3), 330–339. doi: 10.1007/s12016-018-8697-9

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 15

  FacchinS.CalgaroM.PandolfoM.CaldartF.GhisaM.GrecoE.et al. (2022). Salivary microbiota composition may discriminate between patients with eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) and non-EoE subjects. Aliment Pharmacol. Ther.56 (3), 450–462. doi: 10.1111/apt.17091

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 16

  FurutaK.AdachiK.AimiM.IshimuraN.SatoS.IshiharaS.et al. (2013). Case-control study of association of eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders with Helicobacter pylori infection in Japan. J. Clin. Biochem. Nutr.53 (1), 60–62. doi: 10.3164/jcbn.13-15

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 17

  GhisaM.FacchinS.CaldartF.LaserraG.SattinE.ValleG.et al. (2020). Characterization of salivary, gastric and esophageal microbiota in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis. Gastroenterology158 (6), S–837. doi: 10.1016/S0016-5085(20)32770-0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 18

  GonsalvesN. P.AcevesS. S. (2020). Diagnosis and treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.145 (1), 1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2019.11.011

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 19

  HarrisJ. K.FangR.WagnerB. D.ChoeH. N.KellyC. J.SchroederS.et al. (2015). Esophageal microbiome in eosinophilic esophagitis. PloS One10 (5), e0128346. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128346

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 20

  HillD. A.SiracusaM. C.AbtM. C.KimB. S.KobuleyD.KuboM.et al. (2012). Commensal bacteria-derived signals regulate basophil hematopoiesis and allergic inflammation. Nat. Med.18 (4), 538–546. doi: 10.1038/nm.2657

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 21

  HiremathG.ShiltsM. H.BooneH. H.CorreaH.AcraS.TovchigrechkoA.et al. (2019). The salivary microbiome is altered in children with eosinophilic esophagitis and correlates with disease activity. Clin. Transl. Gastroenterol.10 (6), e00039. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000039

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 22

  HolvoetS.Doucet-LadevèzeR.PerrotM.BarrettoC.NuttenS.BlanchardC. (2016). Beneficial effect of Lactococcus lactis NCC 2287 in a murine model of eosinophilic esophagitis. Allergy71 (12), 1753–1761. doi: 10.1111/all.12951

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 23

  HolvoetS.ZuercherA. W.Julien-JavauxF.PerrotM.MercenierA. (2013). Characterization of candidate anti-allergic probiotic strains in a model of th2-skewed human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol.161 (2), 142–154. doi: 10.1159/000343703

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 24

  JensenE. T.DellonE. S. (2018). Environmental factors and eosinophilic esophagitis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.142 (1), 32–40. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2018.04.015

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 25

  Jiménez-DalmaroniM. J.GerswhinM. E.AdamopoulosI. E. (2016). The critical role of toll-like receptors–From microbial recognition to autoimmunity: A comprehensive review. Autoimmun. Rev.15 (1), 1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2015.08.009

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 26

  JohnsonJ.DellonE. S.McCoyA. N.SunS.JensenE. T.FodorA. A.et al. (2021). Lack of association of the esophageal microbiome in adults with eosinophilic esophagitis compared with non-EoE controls. J. Gastrointestin Liver Dis.30 (1), 17–24. doi: 10.15403/jgld-3049

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 27

  KanikowskaA.HryhorowiczS.RychterA. M.KucharskiM. A.ZawadaA.IwanikK.et al. (2021). Immunogenetic, molecular and microbiotic determinants of eosinophilic esophagitis and clinical practice-A new perspective of an old disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci.22 (19), 10830. doi: 10.3390/ijms221910830

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 28

  KashyapP. C.JohnsonS.GenoD. M.LekatzH. R.LaveyC.AlexanderJ. A.et al. (2019). A decreased abundance of clostridia characterizes the gut microbiota in eosinophilic esophagitis. Physiol. Rep.7 (20), e14261. doi: 10.14814/phy2.14261

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 29

  KellyC. J.GloverL. E.CampbellE. L.KominskyD. J.EhrentrautS. F.BowersB. E.et al. (2013). Fundamental role for HIF-1α in constitutive expression of human β defensin-1. Mucosal Immunol.6 (6), 1110–1118. doi: 10.1038/mi.2013.6

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 30

  KellyK. J.LazenbyA. J.RoweP. C.YardleyJ. H.PermanJ. A.SampsonH. A. (1995). Eosinophilic esophagitis attributed to gastroesophageal reflux: improvement with an amino acid-based formula. Gastroenterology109 (5), 1503–1512. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(95)90637-1

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 31

  KhokharD.MarellaS.IdelmanG.ChangJ. W.ChehadeM.HoganS. P. (2022). Eosinophilic esophagitis: Immune mechanisms and therapeutic targets. Clin. Exp. Allergy52 (10), 1142–1156. doi: 10.1111/cea.14196

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 32

  KimS. K.GuevarraR. B.KimY. T.KwonJ.KimH.ChoJ. H.et al. (2019). Role of probiotics in human gut microbiome-associated diseases. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol.29 (9), 1335–1340. doi: 10.4014/jmb.1906.06064

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 33

  Laserna-MendietaE. J.CasabonaS.GuagnozziD.SavarinoE.PerellóA.Guardiola-ArévaloA.et al. (2020). Efficacy of proton pump inhibitor therapy for eosinophilic oesophagitis in 630 patients: results from the EoE connect registry. Aliment Pharmacol. Ther.52 (5), 798–807. doi: 10.1111/apt.15957

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 34

  Laserna-MendietaE. J.FitzGeraldJ. A.Arias-GonzalezL.OllalaJ. M.BernardoD.ClaessonM. J.et al. (2021). Esophageal microbiome in active eosinophilic esophagitis and changes induced by different therapies. Sci. Rep.11 (1), 7113. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86464-z

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 35

  LiuY.TranD. Q.RhoadsJ. M. (2018). Probiotics in disease prevention and treatment. J. Clin. Pharmacol.58 Suppl 10 (Suppl 10), S164–s179. doi: 10.1002/jcph.1121

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 36

  MastersonJ. C.BietteK. A.HammerJ. A.NguyenN.CapocelliK. E.SaeediB. J.et al. (2019). Epithelial HIF-1α/claudin-1 axis regulates barrier dysfunction in eosinophilic esophagitis. J. Clin. Invest.129 (8), 3224–3235. doi: 10.1172/JCI126744

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 37

  Molina-InfanteJ.Gutierrez-JunqueraC.SavarinoE.PenaginiR.ModolellI.BartoloO.et al. (2018). Helicobacter pylori infection does not protect against eosinophilic esophagitis: results from a large multicenter case-control study. Am. J. Gastroenterol.113 (7), 972–979. doi: 10.1038/s41395-018-0035-6

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 38

  MuirA.FalkG. W. (2021). Eosinophilic esophagitis: A review. Jama326 (13), 1310–1318. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.14920

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 39

  NavarroP.AriasÁ.Arias-GonzálezL.Laserna-MendietaE. J.Ruiz-PonceM.LucendoA. J. (2019). Systematic review with meta-analysis: the growing incidence and prevalence of eosinophilic oesophagitis in children and adults in population-based studies. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther.49 (9), 1116–1125. doi: 10.1111/apt.15231

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 40

  Norder GrusellE.DahlénG.RuthM.BergquistH.BoveM. (2018). The cultivable bacterial flora of the esophagus in subjects with esophagitis. Scand. J. Gastroenterol.53 (6), 650–656. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2018.1457712

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 41

  OoijevaarR. E.TerveerE. M.VerspagetH. W.KuijperE. J.KellerJ. J. (2019). Clinical application and potential of fecal microbiota transplantation. Annu. Rev. Med.70, 335–351. doi: 10.1146/annurev-med-111717-122956

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 42

  ParashetteK. R.SarsaniV. K.TohE.JangaS. C.NelsonD. E.GuptaS. K. (2022). Esophageal microbiome in healthy children and esophageal eosinophilia. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr.74 (5), e109–e114. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000003413

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 43

  RaccaF.PellegattaG.CataldoG.VespaE.CarlaniE.PelaiaC.et al. (2021). Type 2 inflammation in eosinophilic esophagitis: from pathophysiology to therapeutic targets. Front. Physiol.12, 815842. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.815842

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 44

  RochmanM.AzouzN. P.RothenbergM. E. (2018). Epithelial origin of eosinophilic esophagitis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.142 (1), 10–23. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2018.05.008

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 45

  SchaeferE. T.FitzgeraldJ. F.MollestonJ. P.CroffieJ. M.PfefferkornM. D.CorkinsM. R.et al. (2008). Comparison of oral prednisone and topical fluticasone in the treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis: a randomized trial in children. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol.6 (2), 165–173. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2007.11.008

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 46

  SimonD.CianferoniA.SpergelJ. M.AcevesS.HolbreichM.VenterC.et al. (2016). Eosinophilic esophagitis is characterized by a non-IgE-mediated food hypersensitivity. Allergy71 (5), 611–620. doi: 10.1111/all.12846

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 47

  SmithE.CaJacobN.PtacekT.KumarR.MorrowC.DimmittR. (2015). Su1105 eosinophilic esophagitis: analyzing the esophageal and colonic microbiome. Gastroenterology148 (4), S. doi: 10.1016/S0016-5085(15)31376-7

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 48

  StefkaA. T.FeehleyT.TripathiP.QiuJ.McCoyK.MazmanianS. K.et al. (2014). Commensal bacteria protect against food allergen sensitization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.111 (36), 13145–13150. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1412008111

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 49

  TalleyN. J.WalkerM. M. (2018). The Rise and Rise of Eosinophilic Gut Diseases Including Eosinophilic Esophagitis Is Probably Not Explained by the Disappearance of Helicobacter pylori, so Who or What’s to Blame? Am. J. Gastroenterol.113 (7), 941–944. doi: 10.1038/s41395-018-0125-5

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 50

  VesperB. J.JawdiA.AltmanK. W.HainesG. K.3rdTaoL.RadosevichJ. A. (2009). The effect of proton pump inhibitors on the human microbiota. Curr. Drug Metab.10 (1), 84–89. doi: 10.2174/138920009787048392

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 51

  VottoM.MarsegliaG. L.De FilippoM.BrambillaI.CaimmiS. M. E.LicariA. (2020). Early life risk factors in pediatric eoE: could we prevent this modern disease? Front. Pediatr.8, 263. doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.00263

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 52

  WolfW. A.JerathM. R.SperryS. L.ShaheenN. J.DellonE. S. (2014). Dietary elimination therapy is an effective option for adults with eosinophilic esophagitis. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol.12 (8), 1272–1279. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.12.034

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar