Abstract
The efficacy of the adaptive immune system in the middle ear (ME) is well established, but the mechanisms are not as well defined as those of gastrointestinal or respiratory tracts. While cellular elements of the adaptive response have been detected in the MEs following infections (or intranasal immunizations), their specific contributions to protecting the organ against reinfections are unknown. How immune protection mechanisms of the MEs compares with those in the adjacent and attached upper and lower respiratory airways remains unclear. To address these knowledge gaps, we used an established mouse respiratory infection model that we recently showed also involves ME infections. Bordetella bronchiseptica delivered to the external nares of mice in tiny numbers very efficiently infects the respiratory tract and ascends the Eustachian tube to colonize and infect the MEs, where it causes severe but acute inflammation resembling human acute otitis media (AOM). Since this AOM naturally resolves, we here examine the immunological mechanisms that clear infection and protect against subsequent infection, to guide efforts to induce protective immunity in the ME. Our results show that once the MEs are cleared of a primary B. bronchiseptica infection, the convalescent organ is strongly protected from reinfection by the pathogen despite its persistence in the upper respiratory tract, suggesting important immunological differences in these adjacent and connected organs. CD4+ and CD8+ T cells trafficked to the MEs following infection and were necessary to robustly protect against secondary challenge. Intranasal vaccination with heat killed B. bronchiseptica conferred robust protection against infection to the MEs, even though the nasopharynx itself was only partially protected. These data establish the MEs as discrete effector sites of adaptive immunity and shows that effective protection in the MEs and the respiratory tract is significantly different. This model system allows the dissection of immunological mechanisms that can prevent bacteria in the nasopharynx from ascending the ET to colonize the ME.
Introduction
Certain pathogens and commensals of the upper respiratory airways can ascend the Eustachian tube (ET) to reach, colonize and infect the middle ears (MEs) (; ; ). This often happens during transient disruptions of the innate immune barriers to the MEs caused by infections of the upper respiratory tract and is particularly prevalent among infants (; ). The resulting inflammatory response in the ME, otitis media (OM), involves pain and fever () and can be traumatic for both patient and caregiver. Although most infections are acute (Acute Otitis Media: AOM) and resolve within a fortnight, the sheer volume of cases (; ) make AOM amongst the leading causes of urgent pediatric clinic visits, ambulatory surgery and prescribing of antibiotics (). In addition, the “proneness” to suffer OM varies (; ), and in an estimated 8% of cases the infections can progress to several chronic forms of ear diseases (Chronic Otitis Media, COM) where the outcomes are more severe, and can lead to hearing impairment and deafness (; ). The societal impact of preventing OM would indeed be profound. However, controlling the burden of disease using vaccines targeted against upper respiratory tract pathogens remains challenging due to our relatively poor understanding of adaptive immunity in the ME (; ; ; ; ). There are limitations to OM infection models using human otopathogens, which alone do not generally infect the MEs of healthy mice, limiting our ability to study and understand the generation of effective acquired immune protection in the ME. A particular knowledge gap lies in understanding how immune components might contribute differently to protection of the ME and the connected respiratory airways (; ; ).
Over the course of conducting studies on the respiratory tract pathogens belonging to the genus Bordetella (), we observed and reported that two mouse pathogens, Bordetella pseudohinzii () and Bordetella bronchiseptica () can rapidly and efficiently ascend the ET from the nasopharynx to colonize and infect the MEs of mice. While infections by B. pseudohinzii are chronic and persist in the MEs, eventually leading to the deafness of the mice, B. bronchiseptica is controlled and subsequently cleared from the MEs over a period of convalescence coincident with the generation of a robust immune response. Here we use the B. bronchiseptica-mouse infection model in which bacteria in the nasopharynx naturally and efficiently ascend the ET to colonize and transiently infect the ME but are cleared by adaptive immunity. We identify the immune parameters induced by infection and vaccination and define their roles in protecting the ME, and how those roles differ from that of the adjacent and contiguous respiratory organs.
Materials and methods
Bacterial cultures
Bordetella bronchiseptica RB50 and its gentamicin derivative resistant strain were maintained on Bordet-Gengou agar (DIFCO) supplemented with 10% sheep blood (Hema Resources) and 20 μg/mL streptomycin or gentamicin (Sigma) incubated for 36 hours at 37°C. Liquid cultures of the bacteria for inoculations were prepared in antibiotic-supplemented Stainer-Scholte broth at 37°C with shaking (200 RPM). Bacterial numbers were estimated spectrophotometrically at OD of 600 nm (0.1 ≅ 2 x108 CFU/mL).
Heat-killed bacteria used for intranasal vaccination was prepared by heating the bacteria (~ 1 x109 CFU/mL) at 650C for 45 minutes in PBS. Aliquots of the samples were plated on BG agar to confirm loss of bacterial viability following treatment. Mice were immunized with 50μL of heat killed bacteria (5x107 CFU).
Mouse infections
The mouse strains, C57BL/6J, and derivative CD45.1 (B6.SJL-Ptprca Pepcb/BoyJ) and the Rag-1-/-, used in this study were obtained from Jackson laboratories and housed in SPF facilities at the University of Georgia throughout the experiments. Experiments were conducted with an n= 3-5 mice. Low dose nasopharyngeal infections were initiated by delivering ~ 500 CFU of the bacteria in 5 μL of PBS onto the external nares of lightly anesthetized mice (5% isoflurane). High dose bacterial challenges were conducted by droplet inhalation of ~ 5 x 105 CFU of the bacteria suspended in 50 μL of PBS and delivered onto the external nares of anesthetized mice. To assess the colonization load, respiratory organs (nasal cavities, trachea lungs and middle ears) were carefully dissected out from mice that had been euthanized by CO2 inhalation (1.5 L/min). For establishing bacterial loads, the organs were homogenized in a bead mill beater 1 mL of PBS and CFU numbers enumerated by dilution plating aliquots of the homogenized samples on Bordet-Gengou agar with appropriate antibiotics. Where flow cytometric analysis was conducted, organs were collected in ice-cold DMEM and carefully ground over 70-micron filter. Cellular content of the filtrate was gathered by centrifugation at 4000g for 5 minutes at 40C and resuspended in Dulbecco modified Eagle medium (DMEM) for subsequent flow analyses.
Flow cytometry
Nasal cavities (NALT), lungs, and/or middle ears were processed and stained as previously described. Viable cells were identified with Zombie Aqua (Biolegend). Antibodies to identify T cell populations were (Biolegend, Invitrogen) included CD45.2 (AF 700), CD45.1 (PE Dazzle 594), CD3 (APC), CD4 (VF450), CD8 (APC Fire 750). Acquisition of the data was performed using the Novocyte Quanteon (Agilent) and analyzed with NovoExpress software (Agilent) following standard gating strategies (Supplementary Figures 4, 5).
Histology
Histopathology of the middle ears was assessed (n= 4 - 5) following fixation of mice in neutral-buffered, 10% formalin solution and subsequent decalcification in Kristensen’s solution. Tissues were embedded in paraffin, sectioned at approximately 5 μm. Coronal sections through the nose and brain, and transverse sections at the level of the middle and inner ear were collected and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Histopathological exam consisted of evaluation of the nose for the incidence (presence or absence), severity, and distribution of inflammation.
Statistical analysis
Data generated was statistically evaluated by Student’s t-test and 2-way ANOVA using the statistical analyses package of GraphPad prism (V2.0).
Results
B. bronchiseptica follows a course of primary infection in the middle ears distinct from that of the upper and lower respiratory tract
Respiratory pathogens associated with AOM in humans can often be detected persisting within the nasopharynx after OM resolves (; ; ), suggesting immune responses may function more robustly and/or effectively in the ME. To define how an infection of the MEs proceeds, and how it might differ from that of the respiratory tract, we used B. bronchiseptica to follow the course of infection in groups of wild type (C57BL/6J) mice. The mice were inoculated intranasally with a low number of B. bronchiseptica in a small volume of PBS (~500 CFU in 5µL PBS) to localize the initial infection to the nasal cavities. Bacterial load in respiratory organs (nasal cavities, trachea, lungs) and MEs were then monitored over days 1, 2, 3, 7, 14, 28 and 56 post inoculation (p.i.) (Figure 1A). As expected, B. bronchiseptica grew rapidly (~1000-fold) in the nasal cavity to very high numbers (>100,000 cfu) in the first week, gradually declining thereafter but persisting for 8 weeks here, and for life in every mouse in many prior experiments, as expected for a highly efficient nasopharyngeal commensal/pathogen. Also as expected, B. bronchiseptica remained mostly undetected in the lungs (limit of detection 10 CFU). However, although B. bronchiseptica was not initially delivered to the ME, both MEs of all animals were colonized by day 2 p.i. and high numbers (~10,000 CFU) were recovered at day 7 p.i. These numbers then dropped close to detection limits by day 28 p.i. and no bacteria were recovered from the MEs by day 56 p.i., indicating complete clearance. Histological examination of HE stained sections from previous studies () showed evidence of inflammation and hypercellularity at day 7 p.i (peak of infection) (Figure 1B). Here we find that by day 56 inflammation had subsided. These results show that despite being contiguous, the course of infection of the MEs differs from that of either the upper or the lower respiratory tract. The results also show that B. bronchiseptica, generally considered a respiratory pathogen, can rapidly overcome the substantial physical (cilia and mucus entrapment) and immunological (various innate responses) barriers of the Eustachian tube to efficiently reach and multiply within the MEs but does not effectively reach the lower respiratory tract. This is an important concern for conventional experimental studies of Bordetella spp. virulence mechanisms, which generally involve delivering B. bronchiseptica deep into the lungs, as discussed below.
Figure 1
MEs of convalescent mice are robustly protected against secondary challenge
The observation that B. bronchiseptica efficiently colonized the ME but is cleared over the space of about four weeks implicates adaptive immune functions in providing sterilizing immunity in the ME. To determine whether mice that cleared B. bronchiseptica from the ME have effective anamnestic immunity, and contrast immunity in the ME to that in respiratory organs, we tested how well convalescent mice responded to a secondary challenge. We inoculated mice (n=5) with the low dose B. bronchiseptica as above and allowed the infection to progress for 56 days. On day 56 p.i, the convalescent mice and an age- matched naïve group, were challenged with the conventional high dose-high volume inoculum (5x105 CFU delivered in 50 μL PBS) of a gentamicin resistant derivative of wild type B. bronchiseptica, to distinguish the very high dose/volume secondary challenge from remnants of the initial low dose/volume inoculation (primary challenge). The strength of the high dose and volume challenge is that it ensures that the entire respiratory tract receives a substantial challenging load of the pathogen, although its delivery of bacteria to the ME is less well known. 3 days post challenge mice were sacrificed and bacterial loads in the respiratory organs and MEs were enumerated. The low dose primary (genatamicin-sensitive) and high dose challenge (gentamicin-resistant) bacteria were differentiated based on their ability to grow on the gentamicin supplemented agar plates.
As shown in Figure 2, the naïve control group had high numbers of CFU in all respiratory organs and MEs (between 10,000 and 1,000,000 CFU). The convalescent group retained relatively small numbers of the primary challenge inocula in the nasal cavity and trachea but had nearly or completely cleared this from the MEs and lungs. Following the secondary challenge, bacterial numbers in the nasal cavities of these convalescent mice were reduced by 100-fold relative to naïve mice, indicating partial but incomplete protection. In the lungs, robust protection was observed against the secondary challenge, demonstrating effective protective immunity despite almost no detected bacteria colonizing the lower respiratory tract over the course of the initial 56 day infection (Figure 1A). Interestingly, B. bronchiseptica was nearly or completely cleared from the ME, reflecting a level of protection similar to that of the lungs, and substantially more complete than that of the nasal cavity. We also observed similar protection when convalescent mice were rechallenged with low numbers of B. bronchiseptica (500 CFU delivered in 5 μL PBS) (Supplementary Figure 1). These results demonstrate that the ME of convalescent mice are robustly protected from reinfection and show that adaptive immunity in the MEs is as effective as that of the lower respiratory tract, and significantly more protective than that of the nasal cavity.
Figure 2
Immune cells from the spleens traffic to the middle ears
We next turned our attention to examining the contributions of humoral and cellular components of adaptive immunity on convalescent protection. We had previously observed () that when immune serum collected from convalescent WT mice (day 56 p.i.) was intraperitoneally injected into naive Rag-1-/- mice and challenged, bacterial CFUs in the MEs were reduced by ~ 100-fold compared to untreated Rag-1-/- mice. This indicated that serum IgG antibodies can substantially protect the MEs, though serum antibodies alone do not account for the near sterilizing immunity seen in the MEs of convalescent WT mice. To examine the contribution of cellular immunity to protection of the MEs, we examined whether immune cells from secondary lymphoid organs (SLOs) would traffic to the MEs in response to infections. We prepared single cell suspensions from spleens isolated from naive 6-7 week old C57BL/6J- CD45.1 (B6.SJL-Ptprca Pepcb/BoyJ) mice and adoptively transferred them into Rag-1-/- mice, which lack mature T- and B-cells. 3 hours after this transfer we intranasally inoculated the treated mice with a low dose inoculum of B. bronchiseptica (500 CFU/5µL PBS) to initiate nasopharyngeal infections. As controls we included a group of splenocyte transferred, but uninfected Rag-1-/- mice.
At day 21 p.i, we sacrificed the mice and enumerated lymphocytes trafficked to the nasal cavities (NC) and MEs by flow cytometry. Rag-1-/- mice not given wild type spleen cells succumb to infection before day 21, so could not be included for comparison. As shown in Figure 3, both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells CD45.1 (confirming donor origin) T-cells were detected in the nasal cavities and ME samples of uninfected control Rag-1-/- mice. B. bronchiseptica infection induced > 2-fold increase in numbers of CD4+ and CD8+ cells in both the nasal cavities and the MEs, demonstrating similar recruitment and/or expansion of lymphoid cells in response to infections at these sites.
Figure 3
Recruited T-cells complement the intraepithelial mucosa of the ME
As mentioned above, even low dose, low volume B. bronchiseptica inoculations are lethal to Rag-1-/- mice within weeks, but adoptively transferring wild type splenocytes rescued them from this lethality (Supplementary Figure 2). Although the MEs of the Rag-1-/- mice receiving wild type splenocytes did not clear the primary infections even at day 56 p.i. (Supplementary Figure 3), they allowed long term experiments and observations to be made. To examine where the recruited T-cells localized in the convalescent MEs, we conducted a histological study of splenocyte-transferred and B. bronchiseptica-infected Rag-1-/- mice at day 56 p.i. As shown in Figure 4 (and in Figure 1B), H&E-stained sections of the day 56 p.i. MEs showed no gross pathology, though limited cellular infiltrates were observed (4B and 4C).
Figure 4
To localize T-cells in the MEs, H/E stained sections prepared from of the same ME sample block were incubated with HRP-conjugated anti-CD3+ antibodies. Developed sections showed aggregates of stained T-cells dispersed in the mucosa (inset Figures 4D, E), clearly demonstrating that T-cells are recruited to the ME in response to B. bronchiseptica and occupy the intraepithelial regions of the ME mucosa.
Recruited immune cells protect the ME against secondary challenge
We next examined whether recruited splenocytes protect the MEs of Rag-1-/- mice from secondary (high dose) challenges. As schematically outlined in Figure 5, splenocytes from naïve WT mice were adoptively transferred into two groups of Rag-1-/- mice (n=4) that were then inoculated with low dose inocula 3 hours later. On day 56 p.i. one group was challenged with the high dose inoculum of the gentamicin resistant B. bronchiseptica strain, while the second group (n=3) was left uninfected to determine the numbers of bacteria persisting from the primary low dose challenge (Supplementary 3). A third group of naïve Rag-1-/- mice were challenged with the high dose of the gentamicin resistant pathogen on day 56 p.i. to serve as non-protected (not transferred splenocytes) controls. After 3 days of the secondary high dose challenge, mice were sacrificed and bacterial loads in the nasal cavity, MEs and lungs were enumerated.
Figure 5
In the untreated (no splenocytes transferred) Rag-1-/- mice challenged with high dose inoculum (top panel), uniformly high bacterial CFUs were recovered from the nasal cavities (>1,000,000), MEs (>100,000) and lungs (>100,000). If left untreated these mice succumb to infection in about a month. In contrast, mice that received the splenocytes (middle panel) and a low dose of B. bronchiseptica 56 days earlier had moderate numbers (~100,000) in the nasal cavities. This (>10-fold reduction relative to the untreated mice suggests partial protection of the nasal cavities. In contrast, the bacterial numbers in MEs and lungs of splenocyte transferred and challenged mice were >99% reduced, relative to controls, indicating that, unlike in the nasopharynx, the transferred splenocytes were able to confer robust protective immunity. It is important to highlight that we still recovered gentamicin sensitive B. bronchiseptica in the nasal cavities and MEs (albeit only hundreds of CFUs in the lungs) indicating that the transferred/recruited splenocytes are by themselves not sufficient to completely clear primary ME infections. This is confirmed by the control mice (lower panel, n=3) receiving the splenocytes and the low dose inoculum. In this group, substantial bacterial CFUs were recovered from the nasal cavities (~105 CFUs) while 100s of CFUs were also found in the MEs, but not in the lungs, indicating that the transferred/recruited splenocytes are by themselves sufficient to clear the lower respiratory tract, but are not sufficient to clear the ME. These results indicate that the anamnestic responses in the three contiguous compartments, i.e the MEs, lower and upper respiratory airways, are qualitatively distinct from each other. Furthermore, these data show that recruited immune cells from secondary lymphoid organs are insufficient to clear primary infections in the upper respiratory tracts but are necessary and sufficient to confer robust protection against subsequent challenges in the lungs and MEs.
Intranasal immunization with heat-killed B. bronchiseptica robustly protects the MEs
We next examined whether vaccination induces similar protection in the MEs and respiratory organs. We used heat-killed whole cell B. bronchiseptica (5x107 CFU/mL in 50μL of PBS) delivered intranasally, where mucosal stimulation against respiratory pathogens is known to be strong () and is the recommended method of delivery for non-human animal vaccines to protect against B. bronchiseptica (; ). To evaluate the levels of protection conferred by the vaccine relative to convalescent immune protection, we also included a group of mice that had been inoculated eight weeks earlier with a low dose of B. bronchiseptica (streptomycin resistant). Protection was assessed 3 days following high does challenge (Figure 6).
Figure 6
Naïve (PBS vaccinated) mice showed high bacterial loads in the MEs and respiratory organs. The convalescent group of mice showed strong adaptive immune protection in the MEs and lower respiratory tract while the nasal cavities were only partially protected. Interestingly, protection conferred by the intranasal vaccinations was very similar to that of the convalescent mice, successfully protecting the MEs and lower respiratory tract from high-dose challenge of B. bronchiseptica. However, the nasal cavities remained only partially protected, indicating that immune mechanisms more efficiently protect the MEs than they do the upper respiratory tract, despite being the actual site of vaccination.
Differential T-cell responses generated in middle ears relative to respiratory tract
Flow cytometric analysis conducted on cells prepared from nasal, lung and ME samples from the above experiment did not indicate any expansion of B-cell populations on challenge in either the convalescent or vaccinated groups (Supplementary Figure 6). This has precluded any definitive conclusion on their contributions. However, we observed greater numbers of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells recovered from these immune animals relative to naïve mice in all these organs (Figure 7). Interestingly, though higher numbers of CD4+ T cells and differential CD4+/CD8+ ratios correlated with robust protection in the MEs (Figures 7C) and lungs (Figure 7A) of immune mice, these appear to be insufficient to facilitate clearance of the nasal cavity (Figure 7B) by 3 days post-challenge. This further supports the observation that robust protective T cell-mediated immunity in the MEs and lungs can be generated via upper respiratory infections and vaccination, yet the level of protection generated by either means is less complete in the nasopharynx.
Figure 7
Discussion
Despite a compelling need to understand acquired immunity within the MEs, this has been particularly difficult to study using human otopathogens owing to their inability to naturally colonize the MEs of experimental mice that can be manipulated immunologically. A natural respiratory/middle ear infection model in mice is especially relevant to the study and understanding of adaptive immunity of the MEs given the connection of the organ, via the ET, to the upper respiratory airways from which most ME infections originate and where the early stages of cognate immunity in a naïve host are likely to be established. The mammalian upper respiratory tract commensal/pathogen, B. bronchiseptica, appears to be a natural otopathogen of mice, highly efficient in causing infections resembling human AOM. This experimental system is well-suited to investigate how AOM is cleared and how long-term immune protection of the MEs may be generated. As we have shown, B. bronchiseptica efficiently establishes inflammatory infections in the MEs of nasally inoculated mice that are eventually controlled and subsequently cleared. As observed for the prevalent human otopathogens (; ; ), B. bronchiseptica is cleared from the ME but persists in the nasopharynx indefinitely, underscoring the particulars of the protective immunological environment that surveils and protects the MEs from potential otopathogens that persist in the nasopharynx. Our assessment of the levels of protection in convalescent mice showed near sterilizing anamnestic immunity in the MEs and lungs, but only partial protection of the nasal cavities, highlighting the distinct environment of the MEs compared to the nasopharynx.
Adoptively transferring naïve wild type splenocytes into Rag-1-/- mice allowed peripheral T-cells to be recruited to the MEs in response to infection. This influx of lymphocytes from secondary lymphoid organs was further confirmed by the histopathological detection of CD3+ populations of cells complementing the intraepithelial mucosa (or mucoperiosteum) of the infected mice at day 56 p.i.
Prior studies (; ; ) established that the MEs exhibit the features of an effector site of adaptive immunity, with increase in antigen specific secretory IgA titers and Th2 cytokines on antigen restimulation. Intranasal immunization also partially reduced the bacterial burden of experimentally injected non-typeable H. influenzae in the MEs of BALB/c mice compared to uninfected controls. However how this control relates to infection in the nasopharynx was not possible to assess due to the need to directly introduce the pathogen into the ME (). We see here that intranasal immunizations using heat-killed B. bronchiseptica provide strong protection to the MEs, but only partially protect the nasopharynx. These results clearly indicate that intranasal vaccine-induced protection of the MEs can be very effective even against a commensal/pathogen that is highly adapted to successfully colonize and persist in the upper respiratory airways and establishes that in resisting such an efficient colonizer the ME is an independent and vaccine-targetable organ.
This initial investigation of adaptive immunity of the MEs using a natural model of AOM in mice demonstrates an experimental system that can address several pressing questions. Where along the Eustachian tube-ME mucosal geography is protection conferred by antibodies and immune cells? How might protective immunity be established to protect against other otopathogens and/or polymicrobial infections? Do viral infections or allergic immune disturbances compromise induced protection to facilitate (re)infections of the MEs? How might deficiencies in immune signaling compromise ME protection in naïve or convalescent hosts? . Finally, since “nothing in biology makes sense except in light of evolution”, it is worth considering what possible evolutionary advantages to a pathogen there might be in infecting the ME, which is essentially a “dead end” site, only connected to the outside world via the ET and nasopharynx. Prima facie, colonizing the ME does not appear to contribute to transmission to new hosts. Are pathogens of the upper respiratory tract exploiting the ME as a reservoir from which to reseed the respiratory tract (), from which they can then transmit to other hosts? Or is the ability to infect the ME not itself an adaptive trait, but simply a side-effect of adaptation to infect deep into the upper respiratory tract? Considering these evolutionary questions may help guide studies to deepen our understanding of the infectious process of AOM and the complex interactions with the immune system that protects the ME.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Ethics statement
The animal study was approved by Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA. The study was conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements.
Author contributions
KD: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. AC: Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. YS: Data curation, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. CS: Data curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. MC: Data curation, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. JM: Formal Analysis, Investigation, Writing – review & editing, Data curation. UB-M: Data curation, Methodology, Supervision, Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. EH: Investigation, Methodology, Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by grants AI156293 and AI159347 of the National Institutes of Health to EH. The funders had no role in study design, data collection, and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcimb.2023.1288057/full#supplementary-material
References
1
AebiC. (2011). Moraxella catarrhalis - pathogen or commensal? Adv. Exp. Med. Biol.697, 107–116. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-7185-2_9
2
AlhoO. P.KoivuM.SorriM. (1991). What is an 'otitis-prone' child? Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol21 (3), 201–209. doi: 10.1016/0165-5876(91)90001-R
3
BakaletzL. O. (2010). Immunopathogenesis of polymicrobial otitis media. J. Leukoc. Biol.87 (2), 213–222. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0709518
4
BashaS.PichicheroM. E. (2015). Poor memory B cell generation contributes to non-protective responses to DTaP vaccine antigens in otitis-prone children. Clin. Exp. Immunol.182 (3), 314–322. doi: 10.1111/cei.12660
5
BhuttaM. F.ThorntonR. B.KirkhamL. S.KerschnerJ. E.CheesemanM. T. (2017). Understanding the aetiology and resolution of chronic otitis media from animal and human studies. Dis. Model. Mech.10 (11), 1289–1300. doi: 10.1242/dmm.029983
6
BluestoneC. D.StephensonJ. S.MartinL. M. (1992). Ten-year review of otitis media pathogens. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J.11, S7–11. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199208001-00002
7
ChoH. J.HaJ. G.LeeS. N.KimC. H.WangD. Y.YoonJ. H. (2021). Differences and similarities between the upper and lower airway: focusing on innate immunity. Rhinology59 (5), 441–450. doi: 10.4193/Rhin21.046
8
ChonmaitreeT.RevaiK.GradyJ. J.ClosA.PatelJ. A.NairS.et al. (2008). Viral upper respiratory tract infection and otitis media complication in young children. Clin. Infect. Dis.46 (6), 815–823. doi: 10.1086/528685
9
DewanK. K.SedneyC.CaulfieldA. D.SuY.MaL.Blas-MaChadoU.et al. (2022). Probing immune-mediated clearance of acute middle ear infection in mice. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol.11, 815627. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.815627
10
DewanK. K.Taylor-MulneixD. L.CamposL. L.SkarlupkaA. L.WagnerS. M.RymanV. E.et al. (2019). A model of chronic, transmissible Otitis Media in mice. PloS Pathog.15 (4), e1007696. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007696
11
EllisJ. A.GowS. P.LeeL. B.LacosteS.BallE. C. (2017). Comparative efficacy of intranasal and injectable vaccines in stimulating Bordetella bronchiseptica-reactive anamnestic antibody responses in household dogs. Can. Vet. J.58 (8), 809–815.
12
EllisJ. A.GowS. P.WaldnerC. L.ShieldsS.WappelS.BowersA.et al. (2016). Comparative efficacy of intranasal and oral vaccines against Bordetella bronchiseptica in dogs. Vet. J.212, 71–77. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2016.04.004
13
HardisonR. L.HarrisonA.WallaceR. M.HeimlichD. R.O'BryanM. E.SebraR. P.et al. (2018). Microevolution in response to transient heme-iron restriction enhances intracellular bacterial community development and persistence. PloS Pathog.14 (10), e1007355. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007355
14
HeikkinenT. (2000). Role of viruses in the pathogenesis of acute otitis media. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J.19 (5 Suppl), S17–S22. doi: 10.1097/00006454-200005001-00004
15
KadiogluA.TaylorS.IannelliF.PozziG.MitchellT. J.AndrewP. W. (2002). Upper and lower respiratory tract infection by Streptococcus pneumoniae is affected by pneumolysin deficiency and differences in capsule type. Infect. Immun.70 (6), 2886–2890. doi: 10.1128/IAI.70.6.2886-2890.2002
16
KingP. (2012). Haemophilus influenzae and the lung (Haemophilus and the lung). Clin. Transl. Med.1 (1), 10. doi: 10.1186/2001-1326-1-10
17
KodamaH.FadenH.HarabuchiY.KatauraA.BernsteinJ. M.BrodskyL. (1999). Cellular immune response of adenoidal and tonsillar lymphocytes to the P6 outer membrane protein of non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae and its relation to otitis media. Acta Otolaryngol.119 (3), 377–383. doi: 10.1080/00016489950181422
18
KodamaS.SuenagaS.HiranoT.SuzukiM.MogiG. (2000). Induction of specific immunoglobulin A and Th2 immune responses to P6 outer membrane protein of nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae in middle ear mucosa by intranasal immunization. Infect. Immun.68 (4), 2294–2300. doi: 10.1128/IAI.68.4.2294-2300.2000
19
KuronoY. (2022). The mucosal immune system of the upper respiratory tract and recent progress in mucosal vaccines. Auris Nasus Larynx.49 (1), 1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2021.07.003
20
LinzB.MaL.RiveraI.HarvillE. T. (2019). Genotypic and phenotypic adaptation of pathogens: lesson from the genus Bordetella. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis.32 (3), 223–230. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0000000000000549
21
MonastaL.RonfaniL.MarchettiF.MonticoM.Vecchi BrumattiL.BavcarA.et al. (2012). Burden of disease caused by otitis media: systematic review and global estimates. PloS One7 (4), e36226. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036226
22
NgoC. C.MassaH. M.ThorntonR. B.CrippsA. W. (2016). Predominant bacteria detected from the middle ear fluid of children experiencing otitis media: A systematic review. PloS One11, e0150949. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150949
23
PichicheroM. E. (2016). Ten-year study of the stringently defined otitis-prone child in rochester, NY. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J.35 (9), 1033–1039. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000001217
24
PichicheroM.MalleyR.KaurR.ZagurskyR.AndersonP. (2023). Acute otitis media pneumococcal disease burden and nasopharyngeal colonization in children due to serotypes included and not included in current and new pneumococcal conjugate vaccines. Expert Rev. Vaccines22 (1), 118–138. doi: 10.1080/14760584.2023.2162506
25
RosenfeldR. M.TunkelD. E.SchwartzS. R.AnneS.BishopC. E.CheliusD. C.et al. (2022). Clinical practice guideline: tympanostomy tubes in children (Update). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.166 (1_suppl), S1–S55. doi: 10.1177/01945998211065662
26
SabirovA.KodamaS.HiranoT.SuzukiM.MogiG. (2001). Intranasal immunization enhances clearance of nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae and reduces stimulation of tumor necrosis factor alpha production in the murine model of otitis media. Infect. Immun.69 (5), 2964–2971. doi: 10.1128/IAI.69.5.2964-2971.2001
27
SchilderA. G.ChonmaitreeT.CrippsA. W.RosenfeldR. M.CasselbrantM. L.HaggardM. P.et al. (2016). Otitis media. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers.2 (1), 16063. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2016.63
28
SorianoF. (1997). Microbial etiologies of acute otitis media. Clin. Microbiol. Infect.3, 3S23–3S25. doi: 10.1016/S1198-743X(14)64948-X
29
WeiserJ. N. (2010). The pneumococcus: why a commensal misbehaves. J. Mol. Med. (Berl).88 (2), 97–102. doi: 10.1007/s00109-009-0557-x
30
ZoharT.HsiaoJ. C.MehtaN.DasJ.DevadhasanA.KarpinskiW.et al. (2022). Upper and lower respiratory tract correlates of protection against respiratory syncytial virus following vaccination of nonhuman primates. Cell Host Microbe30 (1), 41–52.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2021.11.006
Summary
Keywords
otitis media, adaptive immunity, Bordetella bronchiseptica, natural model, vaccination
Citation
Dewan KK, Caulfield A, Su Y, Sedney CJ, Callender M, Masters J, Blas-Machado U and Harvill ET (2023) Adaptive immune protection of the middle ears differs from that of the respiratory tract. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 13:1288057. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1288057
Received
03 September 2023
Accepted
01 November 2023
Published
06 December 2023
Volume
13 - 2023
Edited by
Justin A. Thornton, Mississippi State University, United States
Reviewed by
Jason W. Rosch, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, United States; Stavros Panagiotou, The University of Manchester, United Kingdom
Updates
Copyright
© 2023 Dewan, Caulfield, Su, Sedney, Callender, Masters, Blas-Machado and Harvill.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Kalyan K. Dewan, kaldew@uga.edu
†These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.