ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol., 03 April 2024

Sec. Parasite and Host

Volume 14 - 2024 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2024.1381537

Deciphering the epidemiological dynamics: Toxoplasma gondii seroprevalence in mainland China’s food animals, 2010-2023

  • 1. Key Laboratory of Zoonosis Prevention and Control of Guangdong Province, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

  • 2. Kerry Rehabilitation Medicine Research Institute, Shenzhen, China

  • 3. College of Agriculture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

  • 4. Key Laboratory of Zoonosis of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

Abstract

Background:

Toxoplasma gondii (T. gondii) is a significant protozoan pathogen among food animals. Despite the threat to public health by T. gondii infections, there’s limited understanding of its seroprevalence and trends in food animals across mainland China. This study aimed to estimate the seroprevalence of T. gondii infections among swine, sheep, goats, chickens, and cattle in mainland China from 2010 to 2023.

Methods:

We searched cross-sectional studies published between 2010 and 2023 that reported the prevalence of T. gondii in food animals from databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, China Biology Medicine Disc (CBM), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang data, and the China Science and Technology Journal Database (CQVIP). We performed subgroup analyses to explore the impact of different factors on the seroprevalence of T. gondii. Pooled estimates of T. gondii seroprevalence were calculated with a random-effects model.

Results:

An analysis of 184 studies involving 211985 animals revealed a T. gondii overall seroprevalence of 15.3% (95% CI: 13.1-17.8). Although the seroprevalence of food animals across mainland China was relatively stable from 2010 to 2023, notable variations were observed across different animal types and regions (P < 0.01), along with changes in geographical distribution. Sample type, detection method, animal age, and history of abortion were identified as key risk factors for T. gondii seroprevalence.

Conclusion:

The study conducted a meta-analysis on the seroprevalence of T. gondii in mainland China’s Food Animals from 2010 to 2023, and identified key risk factors. These findings advance our understanding of T. gondii infection dynamics, offering critical insights for developing control strategies and guiding public health policies.

1 Introduction

Toxoplasma gondii, a coccidian parasite, has been considered as an important zoonotic protozoan parasite in food animals, which can cause large economic losses (; ). It is estimated that one-third of the world population is infected with T. gondii (). All warm-blooded species, including people, livestock, and wildlife, serve as intermediate hosts for T. gondii, with cats and other felids as its only known definitive host (; ). T. gondii can invade the nucleated cells of these species, where it survives and replicates (). Pregnant women and immunocompromised individuals are considered the main risk groups for T. gondii infection, which can cause severe health problems (; ).

Humans typically contract T. gondii infection by ingesting food or water contaminated with sporulated oocysts shed by the primarily infected felines or consuming undercooked or raw meat containing tissue cysts (). In farming environments, common food animals such as cows, sheep, and swine may contract T. gondii by consuming feed and water contaminated with sporulated oocysts. This infection results in the formation of cysts in their tissues, which can then be transmitted to humans if the meat is not thoroughly cooked. In addition to meat, other food items, such as milk, marine products, and vegetables can also serve as potential sources of T. gondii infection (). Furthermore, T. gondii can cross the placenta, which may result in vertical transmission and congenital toxoplasmosis, especially in sheep, goats, and humans.

Over the past ten years, T. gondii infections in food animals have raised serious concerns among Chinese consumers (). After the acute T. gondii infection, these animals typically progress to a chronic phase and carrying tissue cysts that can be transmitted to humans. Cultural factors significantly impact the differences in the prevalence of T. gondii between different countries, especially regarding dietary habits (; ). A significant association exists between human T. gondii infections and consuming raw or undercooked meat (; ). In traditional Chinese cuisine, the staple foods typically consist of slowly simmered meats, rice, noodles, and various cooked vegetables, with meats having become the major and favored food in the past decades. Although most Chinese people don’t often eat undercooked meats or animal-by products, regional foods like hotpot, BBQ, and raw milk products are popular, especially with raised living standards (; ).

According to the (Stat. Com. of China, 2023), mainland China’s total pork, beef, mutton, and poultry output increased by 3.8% compared to the previous year, reaching 92.27 million tons in 2022, indicating an expanding preference for various animal-based foods. The consumption of different food animals is especially indicative of this rising need; chickens and ducks are the most common species among poultry, while the most commonly consumed mammals are cattle, goats, sheep, and swine. Unfortunately, conventional meat inspection methods cannot detect T. gondii infections, and little attention is paid to implement preventative measures within the food supply chain (). The absence of specific inspection strategies and standards for handling infected meat poses a potential public health concern.

There is a substantial study gap in studies on the prevalence and dynamics of T. gondii in food animals, especially in the last ten years, even though there has been a great deal of epidemiological research on the T. gondii in humans, livestock, and pets in mainland China. Significantly, existing studies primarily concentrated on evaluating the prevalence of animal T. gondii in a broad sense, without specifically focusing on its prevalence in food animals raised for human consumption. These studies might include diseased or already succumbed animals in their analyses, raising concern since the findings may not accurately represent the true prevalence of T. gondii in meat and meat products intended for human consumption.

Our research carefully excluded studies that examined sick or dead animals and instead concentrated on T. gondii infections in food animals produced for human consumption in mainland China between 2010 and 2023. This period has not only witnessed a substantial increase in the consumption of animal products but also brought to light the imperative need for a more profound understanding of food safety and zoonotic diseases, especially in the context of global and localized disease outbreaks. Additionally, further influenced by climate change and resultant extreme weather events in China (; ; ; ), these factors collectively signal the potential shifts in infectious disease dynamics. In order to address the changing health concerns in this important field, our research used meta-analysis to determine the effects of these environmental and public health changes on T. gondii seroprevalence.

2 Materials and methods

This study followed PRISMA guidelines, and the registration application for PROSPERO has been approved (ID: CRD42023437036).

2.1 Search strategy

To capture the majority of relevant articles, we systematically searched databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, China Biology Medicine Disc (CBM), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang data, and the China Science and Technology journal database (CQVIP) for studies published from January 1, 2010 to October 13, 2023, with no language restrictions. The specific search steps for all databases are detailed in Supplementary Table S1-4. Additionally, we reviewed the reference lists of the analyzed studies and recent reviews.

2.2 Study selection and data extraction

In this study, the following inclusion criteria were considered: (1) The research subjects were common edible animals in mainland China (swine, cattle, goats, sheep, chickens). (2) Studies detected the prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii with the sample size and the number of positive cases. (3) Research published between 2010-2023 with a sample size of 50 or more. (4) Only serology detection methods, such as IHA, MAT, and ELISA, are acceptable. (5) Only cross-sectional study types are included.

The standard exclusion criteria included (1) Articles with reviews, abstracts, conference abstracts, and studies without raw data. (2) Studies that test multiple or mixed samples on a single animal individual. (3) Studies involving wildlife, sick animals, or dead animals. (4) Only the most comprehensive one will be included in duplicate publications or multiple articles using the same data.

Two investigators (ZP Yang and Hao Yuan) carried out the search strategy and assessed all article titles and abstracts by the eligibility standards. The information to be extracted included first author, year of publication, region, animal species, sample type, detection method, sample size, number of positive cases, sample selection, animal age, season, and location of sampling. From a food safety perspective, yaks, cattle, and dairy cows were grouped as ‘cattle’ to simplify raw data processing and enable easier comparisons among food animal species.

After selecting full articles, data was extracted individually by the two investigators using a standard form. The third investigator (ZG Yuan) resolved any assessment discrepancies with an agreement.

2.3 Quality assessment

The quality assessment follows the quality evaluation criteria from a similar study (), which was based on the GRADE criteria (). Four categories are scored: detection method, sample size, sample collection method, and the presence of four or more risk factors. Each category can score up to 1 point, totaling 4 points. A score of 0-1 indicates low quality, 2 is moderate quality, and 3-4 indicates high quality.

2.4 Statistical analysis

Pooled seroprevalence of T. gondii and its 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated by a “metaprop” command provided in Stata software (version 14.0). We utilized Cochran’s Q test and I² test for heterogeneity assessment (). When the results indicated no significant heterogeneity among studies (P ≥ 0.05, I² ≤ 50%), we employed the fixed effects model. Otherwise, we used the random effects model (P < 0.05, I² > 50%). Subgroup analyses were performed to explore the impact of different factors on T. gondii seroprevalence. The differences between the pooled seroprevalence of T. gondii across subgroups were analyzed using the Z-test. The funnel plots and Egger tests were used to assess publishing bias (). The “ggplot2” R package was used to draw curves of the pooled prevalence of T. gondii across different years and their 95% confidence intervals. The “ComplexHeatmap” R package was used to visualize the pooled prevalence of T. gondii in food animals. From a food safety perspective, we include ‘cattle’ yaks, cattle, and dairy cows, facilitating consolidated comparisons among food animal species.

3 Results

3.1 Search results and eligible studies

Figure 1 presents a flow-process diagram outlining the selection of relevant studies. Initially, we retrieved 2975 articles from electronic databases according to the literature search strategies. After eliminating 1296 duplicate articles, 1679 articles remained. After reviewing titles and abstracts, 1442 articles were excluded for failing to meet the inclusion criteria. Consequently, 184 articles published from 2010 to 2023, comprising 67 in English and 117 in Chinese, were deemed qualified and included in the meta-analysis. The basic characteristics of the included studies are summarized in Supplementary Table S5.

Figure 1

3.2 Research characteristics and quality assessment

The meta-analysis included 184 articles, which encompassed 221 studies, with total number of positive animals ranging from 50 to 30024 cases and 211,985 total tested animals. The quality assessment result of the included studies (Supplementary Tables S5, S6) revealed 154 high-quality reports, 25 medium-quality reports, and 5 low-quality reports.

3.3 Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in food animals in mainland China

As shown in Figure 2, the pooled seroprevalence of T. gondii infection among the swine, sheep, goats, chickens, and cattle in mainland China between 2010-2023 was 15.3% (95% CI: 13.1-17.8; 40810/211985). Subsequently, a random-effects model was used in this study (I2 = 99.553%, P < 0.001).

Figure 2

3.4 Subgroup analysis

3.4.1 Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in different species of food animals

Figures 3A–E showed the pooled seroprevalence of T. gondii for swine, cattle, sheep, goats, and chickens, respectively. Specifically, there were 72 studies for swine, 58 for cattle, 37 for sheep, 29 for goats, and 25 for chickens. Among the five food animals in mainland China from 2010 to 2023, swine exhibited the highest seroprevalence of T. gondii at 23.2% (95% CI: 18.2, 28.7). Chickens followed this with a seroprevalence of 19.9% (95% CI: 14.9, 25.4), goats at 13.0% (95% CI: 9.6, 0.16.9), and sheep at 11.3% (95% CI: 6.7, 16.9). The lowest seroprevalence was observed in cattle, at 9.1% (95% CI: 7.1, 11.3).

Figure 3

Significant statistical heterogeneity was observed in the studies included for each animal: I2 > 50%, P < 0.001. Among all the food animals, there was a significant difference in T. gondii seroprevalence (Z = 37.505, P < 0.001).

3.4.2 The impact of geographic factors on Toxoplasma gondii seroprevalence

We conducted regional subgroup analyses for each animal type (Table 1), and the geographical distribution map of T. gondii seroprevalence in food animals is shown in Figure 4. The distribution of T. gondii serologic positivity rate varies across different regions in Mainland China. Notably, Southwestern China displayed the highest seroprevalence, with a pooled prevalence of 21.8% (95% CI: 12.8, 32.4). The pooled seroprevalences in other regions significantly also shape the national prevalence landscape, with Northeastern China reporting the lowest at 10.5% (95% CI: 8.6, 12.6) and the other regions showing intermediate values. Overall, there were significant differences in the T. gondii seroprevalence among food animals from different regions (Z = 21.131, P < 0.001).

Table 1

OutcomesNo. of studynPositivePrevalence (95%CI)Heterogeneity testBetween subgroups
I2 (%)PHZP value
All
Overall2212119854081015.3% (13.1, 17.8)99.553<0.001
Region21.1310.004
 Northeastern2922927247210.5% (8.6, 12.6)95.883<0.001
 Northwestern7147703545412.4% (9.0, 16.3)99.272<0.001
 Eastern2614229315420.5% (15.0, 26.6)98.666<0.001
 Northern128939163317.7% (12.3, 23.8)97.944<0.001
 Southwestern35339911448521.8% (12.8, 32.4)99.773<0.001
 Central3950809964515.9% (12.0, 20.4)99.393<0.001
 Southern632578385413.7% (7.8, 21.1)98.157<0.001
 Multi-region373911312.1% (1.4, 30.6)NANA
Swine
Overall721031222787323.2% (18.2, 28.7)99.729<0.001
Region66.241<0.001
 Northeastern89553123213.8% (10.0, 18.0)96.870<0.001
 Northwestern104522108226.2% (11.2, 44.7)99.429<0.001
 Eastern1710565243522.1% (15.6, 29.4)98.644<0.001
 Northern291732335.0% (31.9, 38.1)NANA
 Southwestern17231971243826.1% (12.2, 43.0)99.828<0.001
 Central1523227672225.8% (21.3, 30.6)98.379<0.001
 Southern331141364111.3% (2.9, 24.0)NANA
Cattle
Overall584484046339.1% (7.1, 11.3)98.253<0.001
Region7.2250.301
 Northeastern874425747.4% (4.7, 10.7)95.681<0.001
 Northwestern301880222099.7% (6.8, 12.9)97.950<0.001
 Eastern1813809.8% (7.9, 12.1)NANA
 Northern4341962713.4% (4.8, 25.3)98.483<0.001
 Southwestern5411555910.0% (2.0, 23.1)99.189<0.001
 Central890244446.3% (2.9, 10.9)97.737<0.001
 Southern2122514011.1% (9.4, 12.9)NANA
Sheep
Overall3728805268011.3% (6.7, 16.9)99.349<0.001
Region48.923<0.001
 Northeastern2968979.0% (7.3, 10.9)NANA
 Northwestern212072413698.9% (3.3, 16.8)99.477<0.001
 Eastern14558919.6% (16.0, 23.5)NANA
 Northern3347860118.1% (14.7, 21.7)NANA
 Southwestern4112625122.1% (5.4, 45.7)98.575<0.001
 Central415581767.7% (2.5, 15.3)94.614<0.001
 Multi-region24969717.5% (14.2, 21.0)NANA
Goat
Overall2921174291113.0% (9.6, 16.9)98.284<0.001
Region14.0680.015
 Northeastern414911248.3% (4.9, 12.5)85.238<0.001
 Northwestern6257550916.8% (9.6, 25.5)96.433<0.001
 Eastern517561939.1% (3.6, 16.6)95.468<0.001
 Southwestern85376118320.3% (11.9, 30.3)98.238<0.001
 Central597338868.4% (3.2, 15.7)98.947<0.001
 Multi-region1243166.6% (3.8, 10.5)NANA
Chickens
Overall2514044271319.9% (14.9, 25.4)98.275<0.001
Region192.971<0.001
 Northeastern7347344512.3% (8.6, 16.5)91.346<0.001
 Northwestern4108028518.9% (2.7, 44.6)98.62<0.001
 Eastern271035750.3% (46.6, 54.0)NANA
 Northern31125829.7% (4.3, 16.8)NANA
 Southwestern11775430.5% (23.8, 37.9)NANA
 Central77267141721.8% (14.0, 30.8)98.388<0.001
 Southern12127334.4% (28.1, 41.2)NANA

Subgroup analysis based on different regions.

#NA, not available; P value, difference between the subgroups.

Cattle, Dairy cows, and Yaks are collectively classified as ‘cattle’.

Figure 4

3.4.3 Trends in the seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in food animals in mainland China from 2010 to 2023

To reflect the seroprevalence trends of T. gondii in food animals in mainland China, as reported in studies from 2010 to 2023, we compiled and visualized the serologic positivity rates of T. gondii infection (Figures 5A, B). Overall, between 2010 and 2023, the seroprevalence of T. gondii remained relatively stable, with no statistically significant differences in the pooled prevalence across the years (P > 0.05).

Figure 5

The overall T. gondii seroprevalence for food animals was 15.2% (95% CI: 12.5, 18.1) for 2010-2017 and 15.6% (95% CI: 11.9, 19.7) for 2018-2023, with no significant difference (P > 0.05). Despite we observed fluctuation in T. gondii seroprevalence within each animal species between the periods 2010-2017 and 2018-2023, pairwise comparisons were systematically conducted between all possible subgroup pairs, revealing no significant differences (Figure 5C) (P > 0.05).

Comparing the 2010-2017 and 2018-2023 periods, shifting was observed in the regional distribution of T. gondii seroprevalence across mainland China (Figure 6). During 2010-2017, the highest seroprevalence was recorded in Southwestern China at 25.5% (95% CI: 13.8, 39.3), with Eastern China closely following at 23.4% (95% CI: 16.3, 31.3). However, the period of 2018-2023 showed Northern China rise to the highest seroprevalence at 25.2% (95% CI: 18.0, 33.1), while Southwestern China’s rate declined to the second highest at 16.7% (95% CI: 9.3, 25.6). Additionally, the region with the lowest seroprevalence changed from the Northeastern (at 9.8%, 95% CI: 7.7, 12.1) in 2010-2017 to the Northwestern (at 12.1%, 95% CI: 4.1, 23.4) in 2018-2023, highlighting the dynamic nature of T. gondii seroprevalence distribution over time. Details on the pooled seroprevalence across different regions for periods 2010-2017 and 2018-2023 are available in Supplementary Table S7.

Figure 6

We have completed subgroup analyses for the following factors: sample type, detection method, sample selection, quality, season, location of sampling, gender, feeding model, age, cat ownership, and history of abortion (Table 2). Sample type, detection method, age groups, and history of abortion were significantly associated with the seroprevalence of T. gondii (P < 0.01).

Table 2

OutcomesNo. of studynPositivePrevalence (95%CI)Heterogeneity testBetween subgroups
I2 (%)PHZP value
All
 Overall22121198564081015.3% (13.1, 17.8)99.553<0.001
Detection method44.471<0.001
 MAT2321676240213.7% (10.0, 17.9)98.541<0.001
 IHA1171161981351311.1% (9.4, 12.9)98.814<0.001
 ELISA80738252482322.9% (17.8, 28.5)99.663<0.001
 LAT12867225.2% (20.3, 30.6)NANA
Sample selection0.9640.326
 Randomly74967171366516.9% (13.4, 20.7)99.515<0.001
 Non-random1471152682714514.6% (11.7, 17.7)99.527<0.001
Quality1.4570.483
 High1881996713873315.7% (13.2, 18.4)99.605<0.001
 Moderate2711675189912.6% (8.3, 17.7)98.227<0.001
 Low663917819.2% (1.5, 48.9)98.478<0.001
Season1.3510.717
 Spring3612534223314.0% (10.4, 18.0)97.272<0.001
 Summer3413652241517.1% (13.0, 21.7)97.758<0.001
 Autumn4325424358315.2% (11.6, 19.1)98.571<0.001
 Winter279188145214.2% (10.1,18.8)97.212<0.001
Location of sampling1.4290.839
 Farms97910441512116.7% (13.8, 19.7)99.273<0.001
 Households2813807330316.6% (9.8, 24.6)99.271<0.001
 Farming cooperatives350013520.9% (1.6, 53.0)NANA
 Markets3205955913.3% (6.4, 22.2)98.758<0.001
 Slaughterhouses2727689469115.6% (11.4, 20.2)98.758<0.001
Gender0.9250.336
 Female9063441852017.5% (14.0, 21.3)99.283<0.001
 Male5612649193415.0% (12.2, 18.0)94.713<0.001
Feeding model3.1400.208
 Free-range5122134360114.4% (11.1, 18.1)98.141<0.001
 Semi-intensive3169615010.5% (2.6, 22.7)NANA
 Intensive3218966239410.3% (7.4, 13.7)97.972<0.001
Swine69.681<0.001
 Piglet22435250810.9% (7.7, 14.4)90.941<0.001
 Weaning pig10290931108.1% (5.6, 11.1)80.986<0.001
 Growing pig55209417.3% (10.8, 24.9)75.848<0.001
 Fattening pig269671186317.3% (13.4, 21.5)96.288<0.001
 Slaughter pig4130429722.1% (17.5, 27.1)74.338<0.001
 Gestating sow216995242229.0% (21.7, 36.8)97.73<0.001
 Lactating sow5110736235.5% (18.4, 54.7)96.321<0.001
 Replacement gilt9160556131.8% (20.8, 43.9)95.704<0.001
 Breeding boar13117234124.4% (15.6, 34.3)90.984<0.001
Chicken, age (years)42.862<0.001
 <14224860324.6% (19.5, 30.2)84.762<0.001
 1-2271734147.6% (43.9, 51.2)NANA
Cattle, Sheep, or Goat2.5320.112
 <=1 years401249411539.0% (6.6, 11.7)94.841<0.001
 >1 year4735486391912.3% (9.9, 15.0)98.047<0.001
Keep Cats1.6380.201
 Yes383311212.3% (6.6, 19.4)NANA
 No314691178.1% (5.6, 11.0)NANA
Abortion21.98<0.001
 Yes4104720719.0% (14.2, 24.4)73.0590.011
 No454874977.3% (5.5, 9.4)77.7770.004

Subgroup analysis based on risk factors for Toxoplasma gondii Infection.

#NA, not available; P value, difference between the subgroups.

Cattle, Dairy cows, and Yaks are collectively classified as ‘cattle’.

3.4.4 Risk of bias assessment

The bias funnel diagram is shown in Figure 7. The Egger test result indicates no significant publication bias in the included studies (P = 0.202).

Figure 7

4 Discussion

The zoonotic illness toxoplasmosis, which affects both humans and animals, is especially dangerous for animal husbandry and public health (). The lifecycle of T. gondii emphasizes the role of food animals in human transmission, directly linking to the critical risk posed by consuming undercooked meat harboring T. gondii cysts (). Strong food safety regulations and all-encompassing approaches, including enhanced monitoring, public awareness campaigns, and more stringent food processing guidelines, are required to combat the threat and reduce the risk of T. gondii infection.

From 2010 to 2023, mainland China faced significant public health challenges, including COVID-19, African swine fever, and avian influenza. These challenges impacted human and animal behavior patterns (; ; ) and influenced livestock practices (; ; ; ), thereby highlighting the importance of researching T. gondii dynamics and understanding zoonotic diseases more broadly (). Against this backdrop, gaining a deeper understanding of the epidemiology of T. gondii is imperative, especially in a country like China with a vast and diverse food-animal sector.

To our knowledge, this is the first meta-analysis to evaluate the seroprevalence of T. gondii in China’s most common food animals (cattle, sheep, goats, swine, and chickens) from 2010 to 2023. The study’s findings offer valuable insights into T. gondii seroprevalence, crucial for public health experts and policymakers for designing and implementing effective control strategies, particularly in food safety and animal disease management. Our research lays the groundwork for further exploration into T. gondii’s transmission mechanisms and preventive measures. Additionally, it may serve as a reference point for other researchers delving deeper into this field, enhancing the understanding of the global epidemiology of toxoplasmosis.

The seroprevalence of T. gondii among food animals in mainland China from 2010 to 2023 was 15.3%, which is lower than the reported rates for worldwide livestock and poultry between 2000-2019 (28.3%) (), and the seroprevalence observed in China’s food animals between 2000-2017 (23.7%) (), and China’s pigs from 1990-2017 (24%) (). The difference may be attributed to the differences in the number of studies included, methodological differences in studies, sample selection biases, and notably, the influence of evolving environmental and societal factors over time. Despite the absence of specific food safety measures targeting T. gondii in China, it’s crucial to consider that environmental and societal factors influence T. gondii transmission by altering critical conditions for its survival, such as humidity and temperature (). Additionally, a series of epidemic control measures may weaken the transmission of T. gondii. For instance, wildlife protection measures reduce contact between natural hosts of T. gondii and livestock, while closed management and all-in-all-out policies could decrease the spread of pathogens within livestock populations.

To better understand the changes in T. gondii seroprevalence, we divided our data into two periods: 2010 to 2017 and 2018 to 2023. Although the seroprevalence remained relatively stable between 2010-2023, significant regional differences in distribution between different periods were observed. The China Meteorological Administration’s 2023 Blue Book () reveals considerable climate changes across various regions of China since 2010, including an increase in average annual precipitation and a continuous rise in temperatures from 2015 to 2022, ranking among the hottest eight years since 1961. Additionally, it highlights the rise in extreme weather events, which has raised the climate risk index considerably. The regional variations in these environmental factors may have influenced the distribution of T. gondii. Since 2018, compared to the previous period, outbreaks of COVID-19 and African Swine Fever have profoundly affected public health security in mainland China, likely leading to substantial changes in animal management and transportation strategies, such as enhanced wildlife protection measures, stricter animal transport restrictions, and quarantine measures. In addition, the impact of the disease outbreak has shifted consumer preferences towards consuming locally or regionally-produced meat. These comprehensive factors could influence the T. gondii seroprevalence and its distribution in food animals across specific regions.

Although the seroprevalence of T. gondii within each species of food animals shows no statistically significant differences across the two time periods, the observed fluctuations should not be overlooked. These variations, while not currently significant, have the potential to manifest more clearly in studies with larger sample sizes or longer durations, highlighting the necessity for ongoing surveillance. Effective and targeted prevention and control techniques for various locations and species must be implemented in future public health policies and animal disease management plans.

We conducted extensive subgroup analyses to dissect the risk factors of T. gondii infection. Animal species, geographical location, year-to-year variations, sample type, detection method, age groups, and history of abortion are identified as key risk factors influencing the T. gondii seroprevalence. China is one of the countries with the highest biodiversity in the world, boasting various landscapes and animal populations. The variability in T. gondii prevalence among different species can be attributed to differences in susceptibility, which is largely influenced by the host immune system and how it is modulated by parasitic factors (; ). Among the food animal species we monitored, swine and cattle had the highest and lowest rates of T. gondii serological positivity, respectively, while goats and sheep had intermediate rates, also supported by Pan et al (). Significantly, our findings reveal a rising trend of T. gondii prevalence in chickens, particularly in the southern regions, which marks an emerging concern when compared to past reviews (; ). However, it should be noted that the scarcity of available data for certain species might lead to discrepancies between our results and the actual seroprevalence, particularly when examining specific regions. Accurately determining T. gondii prevalence for various species, especially in regions where studies are limited, necessitates increased involvement from researchers across diverse regions in future research efforts. While data from 2010 to 2023 indicate a stability of T. gondii seroprevalence, year-specific fluctuations in pooled prevalence highlight the need for ongoing monitoring, which is particularly evident between certain years. Additionally, the 95% confidence interval variability for the pooled prevalence, whether within a single year or across different years, underscores the influence of various factors on disease prevalence at different times and locations. This variability further supports the necessity of ongoing monitoring of these local dynamics.

We observed that swine and chickens of greater age, specifically adults, tend to have higher positivity of T. gondii, suggesting the possibility of widespread chronic infections due to breeding conditions and environmental factors in these species. The subgroup analyses suggest that replacement gilts, lactating sows, and gestating sows exhibit the highest prevalence of T. gondii among different types of pigs. Vertical transmission of T. gondii mainly occurs during the initial acquisition of the infection by immunologically naive pregnant individuals (). Considering our findings of lowest seroprevalence in piglets and weaning pigs, we infer that most gestating sows are likely infected with T. gondii before pregnancy, providing a certain level of protection to the piglets. To control the spread of T. gondii, breeding institutions should focus on closely monitoring and screening these high-risk groups and strictly manage the environment of pig farms and pens. While a similar trend is observed in chickens of different ages, research on this aspect is extremely scarce. Therefore, future research should focus more on this issue, especially on whether chickens of different ages exhibit significantly different prevalences of T. gondii.

T. gondii infection can lead to abortions or fetal developmental disorders in small ruminants and pregnant women (). Despite the subgroup analysis on the history of abortion involving only a limited number of studies, evidence indicates a strong correlation between T. gondii infection and the incidence of miscarriages. In China, the seroprevalence of T. gondii among pregnant entities is significantly higher in animals than in women, with pigs at 24% and chickens and ruminants at 20%, in contrast to 5.0% or less in pregnant women (). Additionally, variations in T. gondii seroprevalence were observed based on different detection methods. Although there are recognized methods for detecting T. gondii, standardization of detection methods in the food industry is still needed (; ). Given the current limitations in detecting infected animals before slaughter, including the economic and practical infeasibility of employing the most sensitive methods like PCR on a large scale, it’s crucial to explore and adopt a multifaceted approach. We advocate for integrating feasible testing strategies within a broader inspection and quarantine framework, aiming to enhance food safety by mitigating risks associated with meat and related products from edible animals.

To reduce the risks posed by T. gondii to public health and food safety, governments and researchers need to monitor its prevalence trends and craft region-specific prevention strategies. Establishing standardized detection methods for this parasite, supported nationally, is critical for accurate toxoplasmosis diagnosis. We encourage quarantine departments to periodically employ standardized methods for monitoring T. gondii in food animals to track its prevalence. Furthermore, incorporating T. gondii detection into the pre-slaughter quarantine of livestock following the monitoring of localized outbreaks is a measure to ensure public health.

In summary, this study comprehensively analyzes T. gondii seroprevalence in China’s food animals based on extensive research and a substantial, high-quality dataset, ensuring reliable results. It paves the way for further investigations into T. gondii’s transmission and prevention, offering valuable insights for researchers and advancing global understanding of toxoplasmosis epidemiology.

However, our study has limitations. Firstly, our results demonstrate a high degree of heterogeneity, the sources we could not identify through sensitivity or subgroup analysis. Secondly, due to data limitations, our study could not account for the variability in sensitivity and specificity among detection methods used in the original research, leading to uncertainty or variance in seroprevalence rates. Such variability introduces additional uncertainty to the outcomes of this study. Therefore, future research should establish universal detection methods and standards, especially for tailored measures in different regions. Thirdly, some articles lack critical information such as age, gender, breeding methods, cat ownership, and history of abortion, which limits the ability to conduct more detailed analyses on specific subgroups. Lastly, caution is required when generalizing these findings globally since all included studies are conducted in China. This geographical limitation suggests a need for broader, international research to validate and extend our findings.

5 Conclusion

In mainland China, the seroprevalence of T. gondii in food animals was 15.3% (95% CI: 13.1-17.8) between 2010 and 2023, with observed species and regional variations. Although the overall trend of T. gondii seroprevalence remained stable, a notable shift was observed across different areas. Thus, it is advised to implement and uphold stringent preventative and control measures, such as increased monitoring and better food safety procedures.

Statements

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Author contributions

ZY: Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Software, Supervision, Visualization. HY: Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. LN: Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. QW: Writing – review & editing, Visualization. HL: Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. LY: Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. YS: Data curation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. XL: Visualization, Writing – review & editing. XZ: Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. Z-GY: Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – review & editing, Resources, Writing – original draft.

Funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This research was funded by the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2023A1515011795), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31972707).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcimb.2024.1381537/full#supplementary-material

References

Summary

Keywords

Toxoplasma gondii, parasitology, epidemiology, public health, meta-analysis

Citation

Yang Z, Yuan H, Nie L, Wen Q, Li H, Yang L, Song Y, Luo X, Zhang X-X and Yuan Z-G (2024) Deciphering the epidemiological dynamics: Toxoplasma gondii seroprevalence in mainland China’s food animals, 2010-2023. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 14:1381537. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1381537

Received

03 February 2024

Accepted

20 March 2024

Published

03 April 2024

Volume

14 - 2024

Edited by

Olgica Djurkovic-Djakovic, University of Belgrade, Serbia

Reviewed by

Ivana Klun, University of Belgrade, Serbia

Cristina Cabanacan Salibay, De La Salle University – Dasmariñas, Philippines

Huifang Deng, Utrecht University, Netherlands

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Xun Luo, ; Xiu-Xiang Zhang, ; Zi-Guo Yuan,

†These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics