ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol., 13 May 2025

Sec. Clinical Microbiology

Volume 15 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2025.1545157

This article is part of the Research TopicSynergistic Approaches to Managing Gram-negative Bacterial ResistanceView all 17 articles

Involvement of the blaCTX-M-3 gene in emergence of a peculiar resistance phenotype in Klebsiella pneumoniae

  • Department of Clinical Laboratory, Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China

Introduction: This study aimed to investigate the mechanism underlying a peculiar resistance phenotype in Klebsiella pneumoniae, characterized by reduced susceptibility to cefepime compared to ceftazidime.

Methods: Antimicrobial susceptibility testing, plasmid conjugation experiments, whole-genome sequencing, and bioinformatic analyses were employed to characterize the resistance phenotype and identify genetic determinants.

Results: A total of 20 K. pneumoniae strains exhibiting peculiar resistance phenotypes were collected and analyzed. Ten distinct sequence types (STs) were identified, including ST25 (4/20), ST967 (3/20), ST65 (2/20), ST133 (2/20), ST48 (2/20), ST353 (1/20), ST628 (1/20), ST753 (1/20), ST792 (1/20), and ST254 (1/20). All strains were resistant to FEP (MIC50 = 128 µg/mL) but not to CAZ (MIC50 = 8 µg/mL). This resistance was primarily attributed to the presence of the blaCTX-M-3 (14/20) and blaOXA-10 (3/20). Conjugation experiments demonstrated that 5 out of 14 blaCTX-M-3-positive K. pneumoniae strains successfully acquired transconjugants, which exhibited the same peculiar resistance phenotype. PCR analysis confirmed that the conjugates contained the IncFII plasmid. To further elucidate the genetic basis of the resistance phenotype, whole-genome long-read sequencing was performed on three blaCTX-M-3-positive K. pneumoniae strains. The sequencing results confirmed that blaCTX-M-3 was located on the IncFII plasmid, and analysis of its genetic environment revealed a frequent association with mobile genetic elements such as IS26, ISEcp1, and Tn3.

Discussion: The primary driver of this phenotype in K. pneumoniae is the presence of the IncFII plasmid carrying blaCTX-M-3, which contrasts with the resistance mechanisms often reported in Pseudomonas aeruginosa exhibiting similar phenotypes. This study emphasizes the critical role of plasmid-mediated resistance in the spread of multidrug resistance in K. pneumoniae and provides insights into strategies for combating resistance in these pathogens.

Introduction

Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae) is a significant Gram-negative bacillus (GNB) responsible for nosocomial infections, including pneumonia, urinary tract infection, and bloodstream infections (Munoz-Price et al., 2013). The rise in multidrug-resistant strains of K. pneumoniae has heightened concerns in clinical environments, complicating treatment protocols and contributing to increased morbidity and mortality (Liu et al., 2022). Cephalosporins, particularly third and fourth-generation agents, are widely used for treating K. pneumoniae infections due to their broad-spectrum efficacy. However, certain K. pneumoniae strains have demonstrated a peculiar resistance phenotype, showing reduced susceptibility to the fourth-generation cephalosporin cefepime (FEP) compared to the third-generation cephalosporin ceftazidime (CAZ). This phenotype is consistently referred to as the “peculiar resistance phenotype” throughout the article. Importantly, the clinical significance of this resistance phenotype seems to be largely overlooked. This atypical resistance pattern poses a clinical challenge, as FEP is generally considered more potent than CAZ against resistant strains.

FEP exhibits potent antibacterial activity against GNB, including K. pneumoniae and Escherichia coli from the Enterobacteriaceae family, as well as non-fermentative bacteria such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) (Okamoto et al., 1994; Nguyen et al., 2014; Rodriguez-Bano et al., 2018). Notably, a review of the literature indicates that research on this peculiar resistance phenotype primarily focuses on P. aeruginosa, with limited studies addressing other bacterial species. Mechanisms such as the overexpression of the mexXY-OprM efflux system and the emergence of various β-lactamases, including blaOXA-1, blaOXA-10, blaOXA-31, blaOXA-35, and blaPSE-1, have been identified as significant contributors (Aubert et al., 2001; Hocquet et al., 2006; Campo Esquisabel et al., 2011). These mechanisms enable the bacteria to evade the β-lactam antibiotics, leading to treatment failures. Although K. pneumoniae is one of the common pathogenic GNB, reports detailing the mechanisms underlying this peculiar resistant phenotype remain limited. This raises the question of whether there are differences in resistance mechanisms between K. pneumoniae and P. aeruginosa. This gap in the literature underscores a critical need for further investigation into the genetic and biochemical pathways involved. Understanding these mechanisms is crucial for developing effective therapeutic strategies to combat the rising threat of antibiotic resistance in K. pneumoniae.

Materials and methods

Bacterial strains

Between January 1, 2023, and June 30, 2023, peculiar resistance phenotypes of K. pneumoniae strains were isolated from patient specimens at the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, China. To ensure the integrity of the subsequent research, a total of 20 unique K. pneumoniae were selected after removing duplicates. All strains were identified using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) (Vitek MS; bioMérieux, France).

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing

The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values for FEP, CAZ, amikacin (AMK), amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (AMC), ertapenem (ETP), cotrimoxazole (SXT), piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP), tigecycline (TGC), cefuroxime (CXM), cefuroxime axetil (CXA), ceftriaxone (CRO), cefoxitin (FOX), imipenem (IPM), and levofloxacin (LVX) were performed using VITEK-2 Compact equipment. To precisely determine the MICs of CAZ and FEP, broth microdilution assays were performed in sterile 96-well plates. Twofold serial dilutions of antimicrobial agents were prepared in Mueller-Hinton broth (MHB) with the following concentration ranges: FEP from 1,024 to 0.0625 μg/mL and CAZ from 16 to 0.0625 μg/mL. Bacterial suspensions were standardized to 0.5 McFarland units (~1×10⁸ CFU/mL) and diluted 1:100 in MHB prior to inoculation. Each plate included growth controls (broth + inoculum without antibiotics) and sterility controls (broth only). Plates were incubated aerobically at 35°C for 18–20 hr before visual MIC determination. All procedures and result interpretations followed the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines, CLSI M100-2024.

Plasmid conjugation experiments

The transferability of plasmids carrying resistance-related genes was determined by the conjugation experiments using K. pneumoniae exhibiting peculiar resistance phenotype as donors and rifampin-resistant E. coli C600 as a recipient. Transconjugants were selected on Luria-Bertani agar plates supplemented with rifampin (100 µg/mL) and FEP (4 µg/mL). PCR sequencing (refer to Supplementary Table S1 for the relevant primer sequences) was employed to verify the presence of the blaCTX-M-3 gene in the transconjugants. Subsequently, antimicrobial susceptibility testing was conducted to confirm the antimicrobial resistance profiles of these transconjugants.

Whole-genome sequencing and bioinformatics analysis

Genomic DNA from K. pneumoniae isolates exhibiting peculiar resistance phenotype was extracted using a bacterial genomic DNA extraction kit (Tiangen, Beijing, China) and subsequently sequenced on the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform. The original clean offline sequences were assembled with SPAdes 3.13.1 and annotated using Prokka 1.14.5 (Bankevich et al., 2012; Seemann, 2014). Sequence types (ST) were determined through multilocus sequence typing (MLST 2.18.0). The resistance genes and plasmid replicon types of the isolates were analyzed using the ResFinder 4.1 and PlasmidFinder 2.1 web tools from the Center for Genomic Epidemiology (CGE), applying default thresholds of a minimum identity percentage of 90% and a minimum coverage percentage of 60% (Bortolaia et al., 2020). Five representative K. pneumoniae isolates exhibiting peculiar resistance phenotype were selected for sequencing on the Oxford Nanopore platform. A mixed genome assembly of long and short reads was conducted using Unicycler 0.4.8 (Wick et al., 2017). The various plasmid backbones carrying associated resistance genes were visualized through BRIG analysis, while the genetic context of different related resistance genes was illustrated using Easyfig (Alikhan et al., 2011; Sullivan et al., 2011). Additional genomic sequences of K. pneumoniae carrying blaCTX-M-3 gene were retrieved from the NCBI database and used for phylogenetic analysis alongside the strains sequenced in this study. Core-genome SNPs were extracted using Snippy v4.6.0 (https://github.com/tseemann/snippy). IQ-TREE2 v2.3.6 (https://github.com/iqtree/iqtree2) was then used to construct the phylogenetic tree with the TVM+F+ASC+R5 model.

Nucleotide sequence accession number

This Whole Genome Shotgun project has been deposited in the DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession IDs: JBJFKS000000000 to JBJFLL000000000. This range represents a collection of 20 genome sequences, each assigned a unique accession number. The individual genome data can be accessed through the respective accession numbers. The complete nucleotide sequences of plasmids plncFll+FIB_OXA10-217-63, plncFll_CTXM3_218-74, plncFll_CTXM3_220-59, and plncFll_CTXM3_221-24 have been uploaded to the NCBI GenBank database with the following accession numbers CP173724, CP173730, CP173733, and CP173739, respectively.

Results

Information on K. pneumoniae isolates with peculiar resistance phenotype

A total of 20 K. pneumoniae strains with peculiar resistance phenotype were collected and analyzed. Ten different sequence types (ST) were identified (Table 1). The most frequently detected ST was ST25, accounting for 20% (4/20), followed by ST967 at 15% (3/20). The sequence types ST65, ST133, and ST48 each represented 10% (2/20) of the isolates, while ST353, ST628, ST753, ST792, and ST254 were represented by a single strain. Two strains could not be assigned to any known ST. All strains exhibited resistance to FEP, with MIC values ranging from 32 to 512 µg/mL and a MIC50 of 128 µg/mL. In contrast, none of the strains were resistant to CAZ, with MIC values ranging from 2 to 8 µg/mL and a MIC50 of 8 µg/mL. Sensitivity to the carbapenems IPM, ETP and the aminoglycoside AMK was uniformly observed across all strains. The sensitivity rates for FOX and the β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination TZP were 95% and 85%, respectively. In contrast, sensitivity rates for AMC and SXT were both 40%, while the sensitivity rate for the quinolone drug LVX was notably low at 5%. All strains demonstrated resistance to CRO, CXM, and CXA (Supplementary Table S3).

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. The genomic characteristics of K. pneumoniae isolates with a peculiar resistance phenotype.

blaCTX-M-3or blaOXA-10contribute to the development of K. pneumoniae isolates with peculiar resistance phenotype

The blaCTX-M-3 gene was detected in 14 isolates, while blaCTX-M-14 was identified in 6 isolates and blaOXA-10 in 3 isolates (Table 1). The blaTEM-1 gene was identified in 11 isolates, all of which co-harbored blaCTX-M-3. Transconjugants were successfully obtained from ten isolates through plasmid conjugation experiments. PCR analysis confirmed the presence of blaCTX-M-3 gene in five transconjugants, blaOXA-10 in two, and blaCTX-M-14 in three. These transconjugants displayed distinct resistance phenotypes (Supplementary Table S3). The MIC of FEP in transconjugants carrying blaCTX-M-3 and blaOXA-10 was 16 to 32 times higher than that of CAZ, whereas in transconjugants carrying blaCTX-M-14 the FEP MIC was only 1 to 2 times higher. By integrating the susceptibility profiles of the donor strain and the recipient strain C600, it was demonstrated that blaCTX-M-3 and blaOXA-10 contribute to the development of this peculiar resistance phenotype in K. pneumoniae. Additionally, nine isolates were found to harbor the arr-3 gene, which mediates resistance to RIF and was identified as the primary factor causing the failure of the plasmid conjugation experiments. blaCTX-M-3-positive isolates consistently carried multiple resistance genes, with the total number ranging from 7 to 22. Notably, most strains harbored more than 15 resistance genes. These genes conferred resistance to multiple drug classes, including β-lactams, quinolones, tetracyclines, aminoglycosides, and macrolides.

The location of blaCTX-M-3 and blaOXA-10 gene

The IncFII plasmid replicon was detected in all isolates, while the IncFIB plasmid replicon was identified in 15 of 20 isolates (75%). Additional plasmid replicons included IncI1 (3/20, 15%), IncHI1B (2/20, 10%), and IncR (2/20, 10%). The PCR test of the conjugate confirmed that both the blaCTX-M-3 and blaOXA-10 genes were carried by the IncFII plasmid (Supplementary Table S2). To further investigate the genomic context, five representative strains (217-63, 218-74, 219-96, 220-59, and 221-24) underwent third generation long-read sequencing. The analysis revealed that the blaCTX-M-3 gene in strains 219-96, 220-59, and 221-24, as well as the blaOXA-10 gene in strain 217-63, were all located on the IncFII plasmid. These findings corroborate the results of the conjugation experiments (Table 2).

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Information about plasmid carrying blaCTX-M-3 or blaOXA-10 or blaCTX-M-14 a.

Using the plasmid sequence identified in this study as references, circular plasmid maps were constructed using BRIG (Figure 1). This analysis revealed three distinct plasmid backbones carrying the blaCTX-M-3 gene, each characterized by unique combinations of resistance genes within their variable regions (Figure 1B-D). In contrast, the plasmid backbone carrying the blaOXA-10 was identical across isolates, with a largely consistent set of associated resistance genes (Figure 1A).

Figure 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Plasmid backbone comparison. Using the corresponding plasmid sequence as a reference, the inner circle represents the GC content, while the second circle illustrates the GC skewness. The third circle depicts the sequence on the second-generation sequencing map of the isolate that carries the corresponding plasmid. Additional circles correspond to different isolates, which are identified by their logos located in the upper right corner of the figure. Annotations in the outermost circle highlight the locations of plasmid replicons and resistance genes, which are indicated in red font. (A), plncFll+FIB_OXA10-217-63; (B), plncFll_CTXM3_218-74; (C), plncFll_CTXM3_220-59; (D), plncFll_CTXM3_221-24.

The fusion plasmid in isolate 217-63, containing both the IncFII and IncFIB elements and carrying the blaOXA-10, was designated plncFll+FIB_OXA10-217-63. This plasmid had a total length of 261,642 bp and carried ten additional resistance genes: blaLAP-2, sul2, aph(3’’-Ib), aph(6)-Id, tet(A), floR, cmlA5, aadA1, dfrA14, and qnrS1 (Figure 1A). Comparative BRIG analysis of other blaOXA-10-positive isolates revealed that isolates 218–13 and 220–4 shared nearly identical plasmid backbones and resistance gene profiles with pIncFII+FIB_OXA10-217-63, suggesting a conserved genetic architecture among these plasmids.

The IncFII plasmid in isolate 218-74, carrying blaCTX-M-3, was designated as plncFll_CTXM3_218-74. This plasmid spaned 119,574 bp and harbored additional resistance genes, including sul2, aph(3’’)-Ib, aph(6)-Id, tet(A), floR, and qnrS1 (Figure 1B). In isolate 220-59, the IncFII plasmid carrying blaCTX-M-3 was named plncFll_CTXM3_220-59, with a total length of 71,104 bp. This plasmid also contained blaTEM-1 and qnrS1 (Figure 1C). Similarly, the IncFII plasmid in isolate 221-24, referred to as plncFll_CTXM3_221-24, had a total length of 88,594 bp and encoded 16 additional resistance genes, including blaTEM-1, sul2, aph(3’’)-Ib, aph(6)-Id, aph(3’)-Ia, aac(3)-IId, aac(6’)-Ib-D181Y, arr-3, dfrA27, aadA16, sul1 (2), qnrB91, mph(A), tet(A), floR, and qnrS1 (Figure 1D). Notably, the plncFll_CTXM3_221–24 plasmid backbone was the most prevalent type carrying the blaCTX-M-3 gene in this study, with homologous sequences mapped in eight isolates. Comparative BRIG analysis using pIncFII_CTXM3_218-74, pIncFII_CTXM3_220-59, and pIncFII_CTXM3_221–24 as references revealed conserved plasmid architectures among blaCTX-M-3-positive isolates: (I) The plasmid from isolate 220–98 shared backbone structure and resistance gene composition with pIncFII_CTXM3_218-74; (II) Isolates 217–89 and 218–12 carried plasmids structurally aligned with pIncFII_CTXM3_220-59; (III) A cluster of eight isolates (217-59, 218-42, 219-10, 219-51, 220-4, 221-22, 221-29, 221-35) exhibited plasmids matching the genetic organization of the dominant pIncFII_CTXM3_221-24.

The genetic environment of blaCTX-M-3 and blaOXA-10 gene

The gene environments (Figure 2) of blaOXA-10 and blaCTX-M-3 were reconstructed using the extracted regions from four plasmids with known sequences, as illustrated in Figure 1. The genetic structure of blaOXA-10 is characterized by the arrangement “IS26-cmlA5- blaOXA-10-aadA1-IS26” (Figure 2A). In contrast, the blaCTX-M-3 gene was associated with a diverse array of mobile genetic elements, including IS26, IS1X2, ISEcp1, ISKpn19, Tn2, and Tn3. Additionally, the blaTEM-1 gene is frequently found in close proximity to blaCTX-M-3 (Figure 2B). Notably, the blaTEM-1 gene on plasmid pIncFII_CTXM3_218–74 is incomplete.

Figure 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. The genetic environment of blaCTX-M-3 and blaOXA-10 gene. Arrows of various colors represent distinct open reading frames (ORFs), with red indicating drug resistance genes, green denoting mobile genetic elements, and grey signifying other genes. The direction of the arrow illustrates the direction of transcription. Regions of sequence identity are highlighted by light grey shading. The symbol Δ indicates that the gene is incomplete. (A) depicts the genetic environment surrounding blaOXA-10 on plasmid plncFll+FIB_OXA10-217-63, while (B) illustrates the genetic environment surrounding blaCTX-M-3 on plasmids plncFll_CTXM3_218-74, plncFll_CTXM3_220-59, and plncFll_CTXM3_221-24.

Phylogenetic analysis of blaCTX-M-3-positive K. pneumoniae isolates

The complete sequences of 68 blaCTX-M-3-positive K. pneumoniae genomes were downloaded from the NCBI Pathogen Detection Database (accessed on August 20, 2024). These genomes were analyzed alongside the 14 blaCTX-M-3-positive K. pneumoniae isolates investigated in this study to assess their evolutionary relationships (Figure supplement 1). The figure presented key features of the isolates, including the STs, the type of plasmid Inc replicon, and associated resistance genes. The analysis revealed that blaCTX-M-3-positive K. pneumoniae exhibited high genetic diversity, encompassing over 40 distinct STs without a single dominant ST. Interestingly, the majority of blaCTX-M-3-positive isolates were found to harbor IncFII plasmid replicons and frequently carried TEM-type and SHV-type resistance genes.

Discussion

The prevalence of K. pneumoniae isolates exhibiting peculiar resistance phenotype in this study highlights the complexity of antimicrobial resistance in this pathogen. FEP, a fourth-generation cephalosporin representative, is widely used for treating infections caused by GNB (Endimiani et al., 2008; Shoji et al., 2016). Due to its enhanced stability against hydrolysis by extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs), it typically exhibits superior in vitro activity compared to third-generation cephalosporins (Fung-Tomc et al., 1989; Okamoto et al., 1994). Paradoxically, our clinical observations revealed an anomalous resistance phenotype in some K. pneumoniae isolates, showing reduced susceptibility to FEP compared to CAZ-a phenomenon we designated as the “peculiar resistance phenotype”. The 20 K. pneumoniae strains analyzed displayed significant genetic diversity, with 10 distinct STs identified, including ST25 (4/20), ST967 (3/20), ST65 (2/20), ST133 (2/20), ST48 (2/20), ST353 (1/20), ST628 (1/20), ST753 (1/20), ST792 (1/20), and ST254 (1/20). Notably, several of these ST types, such as ST25, ST967, and ST65, have been previously reported in clinical isolates (Yu et al., 2018). Notably, no single ST was dominant among the isolates, suggesting that the peculiar resistance phenotype is not restricted to a specific K. pneumoniae clonal lineage. Phylogenetic analyzed comparing the strains in this study with those retrieved from NCBI further supported this observation.

In this study, all isolates demonstrated resistance to FEP while remaining susceptible or exhibiting intermediate susceptibility to CAZ. Among these isolates, the presence of the blaCTX-M-3 gene in 14 strains is a key contributor to high-level resistance to FEP. CTX-M-3 is a member of the CTX-M type of ESBLs, first reported in 1998 in strains of Citrobacter freundii and Escherichia coli from a Polish hospital (Gniadkowski et al., 1998). Currently, it has been identified in various Enterobacteriaceae, including K. pneumoniae, Enterobacter cloacae, and Morganella morganii (Moriguchi et al., 2007; Furlan et al., 2020; Luo et al., 2020; Souna et al., 2022). However, it appears that prior to this study, the potential of the blaCTX-M-3 gene to facilitate the emergence of peculiar resistance phenotype had not been adequately recognized. The conjugation experiments and associated data presented herein demonstrate that the IncFII plasmid carrying blaCTX-M-3 can mediate the development of higher-level peculiar resistance phenotype. In contrast, the role of blaCTX-M-14 appears to be more restricted. The mechanisms driving resistance in P. aeruginosa differed markedly from those in K. pneumoniae. In P. aeruginosa, the mexXY-OprM efflux system plays a central role, supplemented by various β-lactamases, including blaOXA-1, blaOXA-10, blaOXA-31, blaOXA-35, and blaPSE-1 (Aubert et al., 2001; Hocquet et al., 2006; Campo Esquisabel et al., 2011). Notably, blaOXA-10 was identified in only a limited number of strains in this study.

Mobile genetic elements, including plasmids, transposons, and integrons, are crucial drivers of the horizontal transfer of antibiotic resistance genes among bacterial strains (Su et al., 2018; Tran et al., 2021). The blaCTX-M-3 gene is predominantly located on an IncFII plasmid in this study. This plasmid is recognized for its high mobility and capacity to transfer resistance genes across various bacterial species (De Koster et al., 2022). In addition to blaCTX-M-3, the IncFII plasmid harbors multiple other resistance determinants, thereby contributing to multidrug resistance in the host bacterium. The presence of such a plasmid significantly enhances the adaptability and survival of resistant strains, rendering them difficult to treat with commonly used antibiotics. This study identified three distinct IncFII plasmid backbones carrying blaCTX-M-3, represented by pIncFII_CTXM3_218-74, pIncFII_CTXM3_220-59, and pIncFII_CTXM3_221-24. Among these, pIncFII_CTXM3_221–24 was the most prevalent. In addition to blaCTX-M-3, pIncFII_CTXM3_221–24 carries a variety of other resistance genes, including blaTEM-1, sul2, aph(3’’)-Ib, aph(6)-Id, aph(3’)-Ia, aac(3)-IId, aac(6’)-Ib-D181Y, arr-3, dfrA27, aadA16, sul1 (2), qnrB91, mph(A), tet(A), floR, and qnrS1. These genes confer resistance to a broad range of antibiotics, including sulfonamides, aminoglycosides, tetracyclines, and quinolones, further complicating treatment strategies for infections caused by these strains. Given the potential of plasmids for widespread dissemination and their role in the emergence of resistant pathogens, it is essential to closely monitor the spread of IncFII plasmids in clinical settings to mitigate the impact of antibiotic resistance. Furthermore, the blaCTX-M-3 gene was frequently associated with mobile genetic elements such as IS26, ISEcp1, and Tn3, which are well-documented facilitators of gene mobilization and horizontal transfer (Bevan et al., 2017; Partridge et al., 2018). The proximity of these elements to blaCTX-M-3 supported the hypothesis that these genes could be rapidly disseminated within bacterial populations, significantly contributing to the spread of resistance. Moreover, the co-location of blaCTX-M-3 with other resistance genes, including blaTEM-1, highlighted the complexity of resistance gene clusters in K. pneumoniae. This arrangement increased the potential for co-selection of resistance traits, particularly under high antibiotic pressure, where multiple resistance determinants might be selected simultaneously. In the case of blaOXA-10, the integron gene cassette array “aadA1-blaOXA-10-cmlA5-arr2-dfrA14” had been identified in various plasmids associated with several Enterobacteriaceae species, indicating its widespread dissemination (Arpin et al., 2012; Suzuki et al., 2019). Similar resistance genes were present around blaOXA-10 in this study. The presence of the composite transposon structure “IS26-cmlA5-blaOXA-10-aadA1-IS26” in this study suggested that this gene resided within a relatively stable genetic framework. This stability likely enhanced its persistence within the Klebsiella pneumoniae and facilitated its propagation (Harmer and Hall, 2016).

Our study provided valuable insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying the peculiar resistance phenotype observed in K. pneumoniae strains. Clinicians should be aware that certain K. pneumoniae strains may harbor β-lactamase genes capable of conferring differential resistance to specific cephalosporins, posing potential challenges in treatment decision-making, especially in the context of empiric therapy. Thankfully, while resistance to β-lactam antibiotics, such as FEP, the strains retained susceptibility to carbapenems (IPM and ETP) and aminoglycosides (AMK). This susceptibility pattern of resistance underscored the critical role of carbapenems as the last-resort therapy for MDR Gram-negative infections (Liu et al., 2022; Wu et al., 2022). In summary, this study enhanced our understanding of the complex resistance mechanisms in K. pneumoniae, with a specific emphasis on the pivotal roles of blaCTX-M-3 and blaOXA-10. The emergence of peculiar resistance phenotype underscores the urgent need for ongoing monitoring and the development of novel therapeutic strategies to address the growing threat posed by multidrug-resistant K. pneumoniae.

Conclusion

This study identified a peculiar resistance phenotype in K. pneumoniae, characterized by reduced susceptibility to cefepime compared to ceftazidime, accompanied by a diverse range of STs. The absence of a dominant ST indicated that that this resistance phenotype was widely distributed across diverse clonal populations. Further analysis revealed that the primary driver of this phenotype is the presence of the IncFII plasmid carrying the blaCTX-M-3 gene. This plasmid not only harbored multiple additional resistant genes but also demonstrated high conjugation and transferability, facilitating the dissemination of resistant genes. Moreover, some strains possessed an IncFII/IncFIB fusion plasmid that contains the blaOXA-10 gene, which further enhances resistance. This resistance mechanism in K. pneumoniae shows significant differences compared to P. aeruginosa. These findings underscore the critical role of specific plasmids in the development of the resistance phenotype in K. pneumoniae, which could complicate the treatment of infections. Clinicians may need to consider alternative antibiotics or combination therapies, and surveillance for such resistant strains should be prioritized to guide effective treatment.

Data availability statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/Supplementary Material.

Author contributions

SZ: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. FZ: Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. PL: Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – original draft. LY: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. JS: Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing. CL: Methodology, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by Guangdong Medical Science and Technology Research Fund Project (No. B2023232), and President Foundation of The Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Southern Medical University (No. YZ2022ZX01).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcimb.2025.1545157/full#supplementary-material

References

Alikhan, N. F., Petty, N. K., Ben Zakour, N. L., Beatson, S. A. (2011). BLAST Ring Image Generator (BRIG): simple prokaryote genome comparisons. BMC Genomics 12, 402. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-402

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Arpin, C., Thabet, L., Yassine, H., Messadi, A. A., Boukadida, J., Dubois, V., et al. (2012). Evolution of an incompatibility group IncA/C plasmid harboring blaCMY-16 and qnrA6 genes and its transfer through three clones of Providencia stuartii during a two-year outbreak in a Tunisian burn unit. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 56, 1342–1349. doi: 10.1128/AAC.05267-11

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Aubert, D., Poirel, L., Chevalier, J., Leotard, S., Pages, J. M., Nordmann, P. (2001). Oxacillinase-mediated resistance to cefepime and susceptibility to ceftazidime in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45, 1615–1620. doi: 10.1128/AAC.45.6.1615-1620.2001

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Bankevich, A., Nurk, S., Antipov, D., Gurevich, A. A., Dvorkin, M., Kulikov, A. S., et al. (2012). SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J. Comput. Biol. 19, 455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Bevan, E. R., Jones, A. M., Hawkey, P. M. (2017). Global epidemiology of CTX-M beta-lactamases: temporal and geographical shifts in genotype. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 72, 2145–2155. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx146

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Bortolaia, V., Kaas, R. S., Ruppe, E., Roberts, M. C., Schwarz, S., Cattoir, V., et al. (2020). ResFinder 4.0 for predictions of phenotypes from genotypes. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 75, 3491–3500. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkaa345

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Campo Esquisabel, A. B., Rodriguez, M. C., Campo-Sosa, A. O., Rodriguez, C., Martinez-Martinez, L. (2011). Mechanisms of resistance in clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa less susceptible to cefepime than to ceftazidime. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 17, 1817–1822. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03530.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

De Koster, S., Rodriguez Ruiz, J. P., Rajakani, S. G., Lammens, C., Glupczynski, Y., Goossens, H., et al. (2022). Diversity in the Characteristics of Klebsiella pneumoniae ST101 of Human, Environmental, and Animal Origin. Front. Microbiol. 13, 838207. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.838207

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Endimiani, A., Perez, F., Bonomo, R. A. (2008). Cefepime: a reappraisal in an era of increasing antimicrobial resistance. Expert Rev. Anti Infect. Ther. 6, 805–824. doi: 10.1586/14787210.6.6.805

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Fung-Tomc, J., Dougherty, T. J., DeOrio, F. J., Simich-Jacobson, V., Kessler, R. E. (1989). Activity of cefepime against ceftazidime- and cefotaxime-resistant gram-negative bacteria and its relationship to beta-lactamase levels. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 33, 498–502. doi: 10.1128/AAC.33.4.498

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Furlan, J. P. R., Lopes, R., Gonzalez, I. H. L., Ramos, P. L., von Zeska Kress, M. R., Stehling, E. G. (2020). Hypermucoviscous/hypervirulent and extensively drug-resistant QnrB2-, QnrS1-, and CTX-M-3-coproducing Klebsiella pneumoniae ST2121 isolated from an infected elephant (Loxodonta africana). Vet. Microbiol. 251, 108909. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2020.108909

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Gniadkowski, M., Schneider, I., Palucha, A., Jungwirth, R., Mikiewicz, B., Bauernfeind, A. (1998). Cefotaxime-resistant Enterobacteriaceae isolates from a hospital in Warsaw, Poland: identification of a new CTX-M-3 cefotaxime-hydrolyzing beta-lactamase that is closely related to the CTX-M-1/MEN-1 enzyme. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42, 827–832. doi: 10.1128/AAC.42.4.827

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Harmer, C. J., Hall, R. M. (2016). IS26-Mediated Formation of Transposons Carrying Antibiotic Resistance Genes. mSphere 1 (2), e00038-16. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00038-16

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Hocquet, D., Nordmann, P., El Garch, F., Cabanne, L., Plesiat, P. (2006). Involvement of the MexXY-OprM efflux system in emergence of cefepime resistance in clinical strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50, 1347–1351. doi: 10.1128/AAC.50.4.1347-1351.2006

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, W., Tang, J. W., Lyu, J. W., Wang, J. J., Pan, Y. C., Shi, X. Y., et al. (2022). Discrimination between Carbapenem-Resistant and Carbapenem-Sensitive Klebsiella pneumoniae Strains through Computational Analysis of Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectra: a Pilot Study. Microbiol. Spectr. 10, e0240921. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02409-21

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Luo, X., Zhai, Y., He, D., Cui, X., Yang, Y., Yuan, L., et al. (2020). Molecular characterization of a novel bla (CTX-M-3)-carrying Tn6741 transposon in Morganella morganii isolated from swine. J. Med. Microbiol. 69, 1089–1094. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.001235

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Moriguchi, N., Itahashi, Y., Tabata, N., Yamazumi, T., Furuta, I., Shibata, N., et al. (2007). Outbreak of CTX-M-3-type extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacter cloacae in a pediatric ward. J. Infect. Chemother. 13, 263–266. doi: 10.1007/s10156-007-0526-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Munoz-Price, L. S., Poirel, L., Bonomo, R. A., Schwaber, M. J., Daikos, G. L., Cormican, M., et al. (2013). Clinical epidemiology of the global expansion of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemases. Lancet Infect. Dis. 13, 785–796. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70190-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Nguyen, H. M., Shier, K. L., Graber, C. J. (2014). Determining a clinical framework for use of cefepime and beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitors in the treatment of infections caused by extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 69, 871–880. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkt450

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Okamoto, M. P., Nakahiro, R. K., Chin, A., Bedikian, A., Gill, M. A. (1994). Cefepime: a new fourth-generation cephalosporin. Am. J. Hosp Pharm. 51, 463–477. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/51.4.463

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Partridge, S. R., Kwong, S. M., Firth, N., Jensen, S. O. (2018). Mobile Genetic Elements Associated with Antimicrobial Resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 31 (4), e00088-17. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00088-17

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Rodriguez-Bano, J., Gutierrez-Gutierrez, B., Machuca, I., Pascual, A. (2018). Treatment of Infections Caused by Extended-Spectrum-Beta-Lactamase-, AmpC-, and Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 31 (2), e00079-17. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00079-17

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Seemann, T. (2014). Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30, 2068–2069. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Shoji, K., Bradley, J. S., Reed, M. D., van den Anker, J. N., Domonoske, C., Capparelli, E. V. (2016). Population Pharmacokinetic Assessment and Pharmacodynamic Implications of Pediatric Cefepime Dosing for Susceptible-Dose-Dependent Organisms. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 60, 2150–2156. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02592-15

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Souna, D., Drissi, M., Almahmoud, I., Maurin, M. (2022). Enterobacter cloacae Complex and CTX-M Extended-Spectrum beta-Lactamases in Algeria. Microb. Drug Resist. 28 (3), 346–354. doi: 10.1089/mdr.2020.0535

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Su, H., Hu, X., Xu, Y., Xu, W., Huang, X., Wen, G., et al. (2018). Persistence and spatial variation of antibiotic resistance genes and bacterial populations change in reared shrimp in South China. Environ. Int. 119, 327–333. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.07.007

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Sullivan, M. J., Petty, N. K., Beatson, S. A. (2011). Easyfig: a genome comparison visualizer. Bioinformatics 27, 1009–1010. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr039

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Suzuki, Y., Ida, M., Kubota, H., Ariyoshi, T., Murakami, K., Kobayashi, M., et al. (2019). Multiple beta-Lactam Resistance Gene-Carrying Plasmid Harbored by Klebsiella quasipneumoniae Isolated from Urban Sewage in Japan. mSphere 4 (5), 00391-19. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00391-19

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Tran, T. T., Scott, A., Tien, Y. C., Murray, R., Boerlin, P., Pearl, D. L., et al. (2021). On-Farm Anaerobic Digestion of Dairy Manure Reduces the Abundance of Antibiotic Resistance-Associated Gene Targets and the Potential for Plasmid Transfer. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 87, e0298020. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02980-20

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wick, R. R., Judd, L. M., Gorrie, C. L., Holt, K. E. (2017). Unicycler: Resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PloS Comput. Biol. 13, e1005595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005595

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wu, D., Huang, Y., Xiao, J., Qin, G., Liu, H., Peng, J. (2022). Risk Factors for Mortality Among Critical Acute Pancreatitis Patients with Carbapenem-Resistant Organism Infections and Drug Resistance of Causative Pathogens. Infect. Dis. Ther. 11, 1089–1101. doi: 10.1007/s40121-022-00624-w

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Yu, F., Lv, J., Niu, S., Du, H., Tang, Y. W., Pitout, J. D. D., et al. (2018). Multiplex PCR Analysis for Rapid Detection of Klebsiella pneumoniae Carbapenem-Resistant (Sequence Type 258 [ST258] and ST11) and Hypervirulent (ST23, ST65, ST86, and ST375) Strains, J Clin Microbiol 56 (9), 00731-18. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00731-18

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: CTX-M-3, Klebsiella pneumoniae, peculiar resistance phenotype, cefepime, ceftazidime

Citation: Li P, Yan L, Song J, Lin C, Zeng F and Zeng S (2025) Involvement of the blaCTX-M-3 gene in emergence of a peculiar resistance phenotype in Klebsiella pneumoniae. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 15:1545157. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1545157

Received: 14 December 2024; Accepted: 21 April 2025;
Published: 13 May 2025.

Edited by:

Percy Schröttner, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany

Reviewed by:

Adriana Belas, Lusofona University, Portugal
Cemal Sandalli, University of Missouri, United States
Chongmei Tian, Shaoxing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated to Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, China

Copyright © 2025 Li, Yan, Song, Lin, Zeng and Zeng. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Shihan Zeng, MTUxMTEwMTE0MzRAMTYzLmNvbQ==; Fangyin Zeng, emVuZ2Z5QDEyNi5jb20=

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.