- 1Center of Excellence in Fungal Research, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai, Thailand
- 2Mushroom Research Foundation, School of Science, Chiang Mai, Thailand
- 3School of Science, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai, Thailand
- 4Office of Research Administration, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
- 5Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
- 6Center for Yunnan Plateau Biology Resources Protection and Utilization, College of Biology and Food Engineering, Qujing Normal University, Qujing, Yunnan, China
- 7Department of Soil Science, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- 8Innovative Institute for Plant Health, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, Guangzhou, China
- 9Department of Botany, University of Sri Jayewardenepura, Nugegoda, Sri Lanka
Dracaena species are widely recognized for their exceptional drought tolerance, making them ideal candidates for sustainable landscaping and ecological restoration in arid regions. Limestone outcrops hosting Dracaena are unique ecosystems characterized by extreme environmental conditions such as nutrient-poor substrates. Thus, they provide valuable opportunities for studying fungal diversity and their adaptations. Despite their ecological importance, knowledge concerning fungal communities associated with limestone-inhabiting Dracaena species remains limited, particularly within the diverse biogeographic contexts of Thailand. Microfungal samples were collected from dead wood and leaves of Dracaena species across seven provinces in Thailand (Chiang Rai, Kanchanaburi, Krabi, Nakhon Si Thammarat, Ratchaburi, Songkhla, and Tak). Fungal taxa were identified and characterized through detailed morphological examinations combined with multi-gene phylogenetic analyses using Actin (act), Internal transcribed spacer (ITS), the large subunit of nuclear ribosomal RNA (LSU), translation elongation fac-tor 1-alpha (tef1-α), and beta-tubulin (tub) gene regions. This study documents eleven fungal taxa isolated from Dracaena substrates, belonging to seven families across five fungal orders. Three new species viz. Cladosporium dracaenae, C. dracaenicola and Torula dracaenae were described, and eight new host records were established (Bipolaris coffeana, Curvularia lunata, Lasiodiplodia bruguierae, L. lignicola, L. thailandica, Longididymella clematidis, Ochroconis musae and Zasmidium citrigriseum). Species de-scriptions, color photographic plates, phylogenetic trees and updated taxonomic notes are provided for all isolated taxa. The findings advance the current understanding of microfungal diversity associated with limestone outcrop habitats and Dracaena species, contributing to broader ecological and conservation efforts. By revealing novel fungal species and previously undocumented host-fungus interactions, this study underscores the rich but underexplored fungal biodiversity of limestone ecosystems in Thailand.
1 Introduction
Dothideomycetes is the largest and most recognized class of ascomycete fungi, renowned for its ecological diversity and significance in taxonomic and biological research (Hongsanan et al., 2020). This class includes a wide array of taxa such as endophytes, epiphytes, saprobes, pathogens of humans and plants, lichens, lichenicolous fungi, nematode-trapping fungi, and rock-inhabiting fungi (Hongsanan et al., 2020; Li et al., 2023). Dothideomycetes encompasses over 32 orders, 191 families, 1,495 genera, and more than 19,000 species (Pem et al., 2024). Characteristically, members of this class possess bitunicate asci with fissitunicate dehiscence and are found on a variety of hosts in terrestrial habitats (Hongsanan et al., 2020; Pem et al., 2024). Recent discoveries of numerous novel species, genera, families, and orders have significantly expanded the classification and understanding of Dothideomycetes.
Dracaena, a genus within the Agavaceae family of monocotyledonous plants, includes 198 species (POWO, 2021; van Kleinwee et al., 2022). These plants are distributed across Africa, Madagascar, the Arabian Peninsula, Indian Ocean islands, South Asia, Southeast Asia, Australia, Micronesia, Hawaii, Mexico, Central America, northwestern South America, Cuba, and Macaronesia (Mabberley, 2008). In Europe and Canada, Dracaena species are valued for their ornamental and medicinal uses (Almaghrebi et al., 2024). Dracaena marginata is a popular houseplant known for its ability to reduce formaldehyde levels in the air (Jaminson, 2012). Despite the fact that this species is an ecologically important plant species, studies on fungi associated with Dracaena species are not well established.
Ascomycetes can be found on Dracaena plants as pathogens, endophytes, or saprobes (Thongkantha et al., 2008; Crous et al., 2015; Lin et al., 2016; Chaiwan et al., 2019). Notably, Dracaena species exhibit a rich fungal diversity, as illustrated by Thongkantha et al. (2008), who documented 127 saprobic fungal records from Dracaena and Pandanus in Thailand. These taxa comprised 40 Ascomycota and one Basidiomycota, including 86 asexual morphic taxa. Of these documented fungi, eight sexual species and three asexual morphic taxa were newly described species. However, since 2010, investigations into microfungi associated specifically with Dracaena have been limited (Ariyawansa et al., 2015; Lin et al., 2016; Chaiwan et al., 2021). Therefore, this study aims to investigate and identify microfungi associated with Dracaena species in Thailand by combining morphological characteristics and molecular phylogenetic analyses, providing detailed descriptions and illustrations.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Sample collection, morphological studies, and isolation
Specimens were collected from Dracaena plants in seven provinces: Chiang Rai, Kanchanaburi, Krabi, Nakhon Si Thammarat, Ratchaburi, Songkhla, and Tak of Thailand. Each sample was placed in a separate envelope or plastic bag and taken to the laboratory for observation and fungal isolation. Samples were examined using a Nikon ECLIPSE 80i compound light microscope, and micromorphological structures (fruiting bodies or mycelium from culture) were photographed with a Canon EOS 600D digital camera attached to the microscope. Measurements were conducted using the Tarosoft® Image Framework program. Figures were processed with Adobe Photoshop CS6 Extended version 10.0 (Adobe Systems, USA). Specimens were isolated using single spore techniques (Senanayake et al., 2020). The sample was isolated on potato dextrose agar (PDA) plates and incubated at 25°C. Germinating spores were aseptically transferred to fresh PDA plates and incubated at 25°C. Cultures were grown for 2–4 weeks, during which morphological characteristics such as color, colony appearance, and texture were recorded. The specimens and living cultures were deposited in the Fungarium of Mae Fah Luang University (MFLU) and the Culture Collection of Mae Fah Luang University (MFLUCC) in Chiang Rai, Thailand. Facesoffungi and Index Fungorum numbers were obtained as described by Jayasiri et al. (2015) and Index Fungorum (Index Fungorum, 2025). New taxa were established based on the recommendations outlined by Jeewon and Hyde (2016); Chethana et al. (2021), and Jayawardena et al. (2021).
2.2 DNA extraction, PCR amplification, and sequencing
Spore mass or fruiting bodies or mycelium were used to extract DNA. The Biospin Fungus Genomic DNA Extraction Kit BioFlux (BioFlux®, Hangzhou, China) was used to extract DNA from fruiting bodies or spore mass. PCR amplification was performed using primer pairs, ACT512F/ACT783R for the actin (act) gene following the method described by Carbone and Kohn (1999), ITS4/ITS5 for the internal transcribed spacer region of ribosomal DNA (ITS), LR0R/LR5 for large subunit nuclear ribosomal DNA (LSU), tef1-α-983F/EF-2218R for translation elongation factor 1-alpha gene (tef1-α), and Bt2a/Bt2b for β-tubulin (tub) following the method described by Dissanayake et al. (2020). The genes were amplified using universal primers (Supplementary Table 1). The PCR mixer comprises 1 µl forward primer, 1 µl reverse primer, 9.5 µl distilled deionized (DD) water, and 12.5 µl mixer. The PCR conditions for ITS, LSU, and tef1-α were 3 min at 94°C, followed by 35 cycles of 30 s at 94°C, 50 s at 55°C, and 90 s at 72°C, and a final elongation step at 72°C for 10 min. The conditions for act were an initial elongation step of 2 min at 95°C, followed by 35 cycles of 45 s at 95°C, 45 s at 55°C, and 1 min at 72°C, and a final elongation step of 10 min at 72°C. Conditions for tub were an initial 8 min of 95°C, followed by 35 cycles of 30 s at 95°C, 30 s at 55°C, and 1 min at 72°C, and a final elongation step at 72°C for 5 min. The PCR products were purified and sequenced at Shanghai Sangon Biological Engineering Technology and Service Co. The PCR products were purified and sequenced using the same primers for each gene region. The amplification reactions followed the method described by Chaiwan et al. (2019). The quality of PCR products was assessed using 1% agarose gel electrophoresis stained with ethidium bromide. The PCR products were sent for sequencing at Sangon Biotech in Kunming, China.
2.3 Sequence assembly, alignment, and phylogenetic analyses
All sequences obtained from each strain were used for BLAST searches in the nucleotide database of GenBank (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) to determine their closest taxa. The phylogenetic positions of Dothideomycetes isolates were initially assessed using sequence data from act, ITS, LSU, tef1-α, and tub genes. Species-level identifications within each group were then determined using multigene phylogenetic analysis based on individual and combined gene regions. Reference sequences and outgroups for each fungal group were selected from recent literature and GenBank data [https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov] (NCBI, 2025). Individual genomic region datasets were aligned separately using the MAFFT version 7.221 server (http://mafft.cbrc.jp/alignment/software/). Phylogenetic trees were inferred using maximum parsimony (MP), maximum likelihood (ML), and Bayesian inference (BI). Maximum parsimony analyses were performed with PAUP version 4.0 b10 (Swofford, 2003), excluding uninformative characters and treating all informative characters as unordered and of equal weight. Goodness-of-fit values, including tree length (TL), consistency index (CI), retention index (RI), homoplasy index (HI), and rescaled consistency index (RC), were calculated. Statistical support for branches was assessed using maximum parsimony bootstrap (MPBS) analysis with 1,000 replicates (Felsenstein, 1985). Maximum likelihood analysis was performed online using The CIPRES Science Gateway v. 3.3 (http://www.phylo.org/portal2/; Miller et al., 2010) and RAxML v. 7.2.8 (Stamatakis et al., 2008) as part of the BRAxML–HPC BlackBox on TG tool were used. Phylogeny website tool BALTER (http://sing.ei.uvigo.es/ALTER/) (Glez-Peña et al., 2010) was used to transfer the alignment file for RAxML analysis. All free model parameters were estimated by RAxML and ML estimated 25 per site rate categories. The model selected for ML was GTRGAMMA. The CIPRES Science Gateway v. 3.3 (http://www.phylo.org/portal2/; Miller et al., 2010) was used as part of MrBayes on XSEDE on the TG tool. Phylogeny website tool BALTER (http://sing.ei.uvigo.es/ALTER/) (Glez-Peña et al., 2010) was used to transfer the alignment file for MrBayes analysis. Phylogenetic trees were visualized and annotated using TreeView (Page, 1996) and formatted using PowerPoint 2010 (Microsoft Corporation, WA, USA).
2.4 Genealogical concordance phylogenetic species recognition analysis
The related species were analyzed using the Genealogical Concordance Phylogenetic Species Recognition (GCPSR) analysis model. This model assesses significant recombinant events to determine recombination levels within closely related species and supports the significance of new species in a clade. The pairwise homoplasy index (PHI) test, which evaluates the concordance and discordance of multiple gene phylogenies due to recombination and mutations, was performed using SplitsTree4, as described by Quaedvlieg et al. (2014). The analysis, conducted with a locus concatenated dataset, identified significant recombination if the PHI value was below the 0.05 threshold (Фw < 0.05), indicating that the recombination levels among related species were not different. Conversely, a PHI value above 0.05 (Фw > 0.05) suggested no significant recombination, implying differences among related species in the group. The relationships between closely related species were visualized by constructing a split graph using both the LogDet transformation and split decomposition options.
3 Results
Dothideomycetes O.E. Erikss. & Winka
Botryosphaeriales C.L. Schoch, Crous & Shoemaker
Botryosphaeriales was originally introduced to include accommodate Botryosphaeriaceae (Schoch et al., 2009). Subsequently, the order was expanded to encompass six families: Aplosporellaceae, Botryosphaeriaceae, Melanopsaceae, Phyllostictaceae, Planistromellaceae, and Saccharataceae (Phillips et al., 2019; Hongsanan et al., 2020, Wijayawardene et al., 2022).
Botryosphaeriaceae Theiss. & H. Syd.
Wijayawardene et al. (2022) recognized 22 genera within Botryosphaeriaceae. Species in this family are diverse, functioning as endophytes, pathogens, and saprobes across a wide range of hosts, including woody plants (Crous et al., 2004; Slippers and Wingfield, 2007; Mehl et al., 2013; Trakunyingcharoen et al., 2014, Doilom et al., 2016, Manawasinghe et al., 2016). They are reported on numerous hosts and have a broad geographical distribution (Chethana et al., 2016). The family includes over 100 species and 22 genera (Hongsanan et al., 2020), with several species being significant pathogens of economically important crops, including commercial plantation tree species (Jayawardena et al., 2019). Notably, species of Lasiodiplodia are well-known dieback pathogens affecting woody hosts globally (Manawasinghe et al., 2016). For example, Lasiodiplodia theobromae causes dieback and wood discoloration in various tropical plants, such as Acacia mangium in Indonesia (Slippers and Wingfield, 2007; Jayawardena et al., 2020). However, there is currently no information on Botryosphaeriaceae affecting Dracaena sp. In this study, we introduce three new host records from Dracaena sp. from Thailand.
Lasiodiplodia Ellis & Everh.
Lasiodiplodia is a widespread genus belonging to Botryosphaeriaceae (Alves et al., 2008; Phillips et al., 2019; Wijayawardene et al., 2022). These species have been recorded from many hosts, reporting as plant pathogens (Abdollahzadeh et al., 2010) causing fruit rot, stem-end rot, and dieback on a wide range of hosts. Species of this genus are reported as endophytes (Slippers and Wingfield, 2007, Chen et al., 2015) and saprobes (Abdollahzadeh et al., 2010, Liu et al., 2012, Dissanayake et al., 2016, Hyde et al., 2019) as well. In the present study, phylogenetic analysis of Lasiodiplodia was based on combined ITS and tef1-α sequence data of selected Botryosphaeriaceae isolates. Related sequences were obtained from GenBank. There were 141 taxa are included in the analyses, which comprise 1,691 characters including gaps. The tree is rooted in Diplodia seriata and Diplodia mutila best-scoring RAxML tree with a final likelihood value of − 5,535.293762. The matrix had 472 distinct alignment patterns, with 50.17% of undetermined characters or gaps. Estimated base frequencies were as follows; A = 0.215775, C = 0.287336, G = 0.258654, T = 0.238234; substitution rates AC = 1.014675, AG = 4.025490, AT = 1.480709, CG = 1.199950, CT = 5.465426, GT = 1.000000; gamma distribution shape parameter α = 0.223674. Maximum likelihood bootstrap support values ≥ 60% (ML) and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.90 are given in the nodes. The scale bar indicates 0.02 changes. The isolates obtained in this study are in red, and ex-type taxa are in black bold (Supplementary Figure 1). Three collections from our study clustered with Lasiodiplodia bruguierae, L. lignicola, and L. thailandica.
Lasiodiplodia bruguierae J.A. Osorio, Jol. Roux & Z.W. de Beer, in Osorio, Crous, De Beer, Wingfield & Roux, Fungal Biology 121(4): 374 (2016) (Supplementary Figure 2)
Index Fungorum number: IF188476
Saprobic on dead leaves of Dracaena fragrans. Sexual morph: undetermined. Asexual morph: Conidiomata 150–200 × 146–200 μm ( = 175×173 μm; n = 10), pycnidial, semi-immersed, unilocular, solitary, scattered, globose or subglobose, dark brown. Conidiomatal wall 20–30 μm wide, outer layers dark brown to black, thick-walled, inner layer thin-walled, pale brown to hyaline, comprising two to three layers of dark- brown cells of textura angularis. Paraphyses up to 40 μm long, 2–3 μm wide, hyaline, septate, cylindrical, occasionally branched, ends rounded. Conidiogenous cells 19–21 × 3–6 μm ( = 20 × 4.5 μm; n= 15), holoblastic, hyaline, cylindrical. Conidia 20–30 × 12–13 μm ( = 25×12.5 μm; n=30), initially hyaline and aseptate when immature, becoming 1-septate at the median, dark brown, thin-walled, ellipsoid to obovoid, base truncate or rounded.
Culture characteristics: Conidia germinating on PDA within 4–5 h. Colonies growing on PDA reaching 45 mm diam. After 1 day at 25°C in the dark, initially whitened in a few days, after 7 days becoming gray, fast growing, raised, fluffy, dense, filamentous, reaching the edge of the petri dish after 2 days.
Material examined: Thailand, Chumphon Province, Phato District, Pang Wan, on dead leaves of Dracaena fragrans, 2 September 2017, Napalai Chaiwan, NCCP1, (MFLU 22–0183), living culture MFLUCC 18–1117.
Known distribution: Bruguiera gymmorrhiza (South Africa) (Osorio et al., 2016, Dou et al., 2017), and dead leaves of Dracaena fragrans — (This study).
GenBank accession number: ITS: OM919717, tef1-α: OP099910.
Notes: Phylogenetic analyses show that L. bruguierae (MFLUCC 18–1117) is closely related to L. bruguierae (CMW41470, CMW41614, CMW42480). Lasiodiplodia bruguierae was first isolated from asymptomatic branches of Bruguiera gymnorrhiza in South Africa (Osorio et al., 2017). In comparison of the nucleotide variation in ITS of our collection with those of L. bruguierae, 1 out of 594 (0.17%) (position 51 our species showed A but L. bruguierae showed T) revealed nucleotide differences, whereas the tef1-α nucleotides showed no nucleotide differences. Based on these, we introduce our collection as a new host record from Dracaena fragrans.
Lasiodiplodia lignicola (Ariyaw., Jian K. Liu & K.D. Hyde) A.J.L. Phillips, A. Alves & Abdollahz., in Phillips, Alves, Abdollahzadeh, Slippers, Wingfield, Groenewald & Crous, Stud. Mycol. 76: 120 (2013). (Supplementary Figure 3)
Index Fungorum number: IF 559796
Saprobic on dead leaves of Dracaena fragrans. Sexual morph: undetermined. Asexual morph: Conidiomata 200–250 × 100–130 μm ( = 225 × 115 μm; n = 10), pycnidial, semi-immersed, unilocular, solitary, scattered, globose or subglobose, dark brown. Paraphyses arising from the onidiogenous layer, initially aseptate becoming up to 1-septate when mature, hyaline, tip rounded unbranched. Conidiomatal wall 25–40 μm wide, outer layer dark brown to black, thick-walled, inner layer, pale brown to hyaline, thin-walled comprising two to three layers of dark- brown cells of Textura angularis. Conidiogenous cells 18–22 × 6–9 μm ( = 20 × 7.5 μm; n = 15), holoblastic, hyaline, cylindrical. Conidia 10–20 × 5–10 μm ( = 17.5 × 9.5 μm; n = 30), initially hyaline and aseptate when immature, becoming medianly 1-euseptate, dark brown, thin-walled, ellipsoid to obovoid, base truncate or rounded, with longitudinal striations from apex to base.
Material examined: Thailand, Krabi Province, on dead leaves of Dracaena fragrans, 21 December 2018, Napalai Chaiwan, Krabi1, (MFLU 22–0127).
Known distribution: Dead wood (Thailand), Woody branch (China) (Liu et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2019; Wu et al., 2021), and dead leaves of Dracaena fragrans — (This study).
GenBank accession number: ITS: OM919716, tef1-α: OP169686
Notes: We were unable to obtain a culture because the spores of the species did not germinate. Phylogenetic analyses show that L. lignicola (MFLU 22-0127) is closely related to L. lignicola (CBS134112) (Supplementary Figure 1). The morphology of this species resembles L. lignicola in having thin-walled paraphyses and holoblastic conidiogenous cells (Liu et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2019). However, the conidia of L. lignicola (CBS134112) (15–17.5 × 8–11 μm) are larger than our new host record (10–20 × 5–10 μm). A comparison of the ITS nucleotides of L. lignicola (CBS134112) with those of this new host record revealed 6 out of 631 (0.95%) nucleotide differences. This new host record represents the first reported instance on Dracaena fragrans in Thailand.
Lasiodiplodia thailandica T. Trakunyingcharoen, L. Lombard & Crous, Persoonia 34: 95 (2015) (Supplementary Figure 4)
Index Fungorum number: IF510941
Saprobic on dead leaves of Dracaena fragrans. Sexual morph: undetermined. Asexual morph: Conidiomata 200–300 × 150–250 μm ( = 250 × 200 μm; n = 10), pycnidial, semi-immersed, unilocular, solitary, scattered, globose or subglobose, dark brown. Conidiomata wall 50–65 μm wide, outer layers dark brown to black, thick-walled, inner layers thin-walled, pale brown to hyaline, comprising two to three layers of dark- brown cells of textura angularis. Paraphyses up to 40 μm long, 1.5–2.5 μm wide, hyaline, septate, cylindrical, occasionally branched, ends rounded. Conidiogenous cells 19–33 × 5–10 μm ( = 26 × 7.5 μm; n= 10), holoblastic, hyaline, cylindrical. Conidia 30–50 × 10–15 μm ( = 40 × 12.5 μm; n=30), initially hyaline and aseptate when immature, becoming medianly one septate, dark brown, thick-walled, ellipsoid to obovoid, base truncate or rounded, with longitudinal striations from apex to base.
Material examined: Thailand, Kanchanaburi Province, Sangkhla Buri District, on dead leaves of Dracaena fragrans, 24 October 2018, Napalai Chaiwan, KAN3 (MFLU 22-0146), ibid KLV2 (MFLU 22-0147).
Known distribution: Acacia confuse, Albizia chinensis, Magnolia candollii, Podocarpus macrophyllus (China) (Dou et al., 2017; de Silva et al., 2019), Mangifera indica (Thailand) (Trakunyingcharoen et al., 2014) and dead leaves of Dracaena fragrans — (This study).
GenBank accession numbers: KAN3; ITS: OM919715. KLV2; ITS: ON000546, tef1-α: 269 OP099911.
Notes: The morphology of this collection is similar to L. pseudotheobromae (Gomdola et al., 2020), although it features septate paraphyses and slightly larger conidia (22–33 × 13–15 μm vs. 30–50 × 10–15 μm) (Gomdola et al., 2020; Pipattanapuckdee et al., 2019). The phylogenetic analyses (Supplementary Figure 1) show that our isolates cluster with the ex-type strain of L. thailandica. Lasiodiplodia thailandica was first described from symptomless twigs of Mangifera indica in Thailand (Trakunyingcharoen et al., 2014) and has also been reported on Albizia chinensis, Podocarpus macrophyllus (Dou et al., 2017), and Magnolia candollii (de Silva et al., 2019). Based on these, we introduce our collection as L. thailandica as a new host record from Dracaena fragrans from Thailand.
Cladosporiales Abdollahz. & Crous
Cladosporiales was introduced based on phylogenetic analyses by Abdollahzadeh et al. (2020), with Cladosporiaceae as the only family in this order. Initially, Cladosporiaceae was classified under Capnodiales but was later reassigned to Cladosporiales based on subsequent phylogenetic analyses (Abdollahzadeh et al., 2020; Hongsanan et al., 2020, Wijayawardene et al., 2022). Members of this order are commonly found as saprobic, endophytic, fungicolous, lichenicolous, and can act as pathogens in humans and plants (Torres-Cortés et al., 2015, Wijayawardene et al., 2022).
Cladosporiaceae Chalm. & R.G. Archibald
Hyde et al. (2024) accepted eight genera in Cladosporiaceae; Acroconidiella, Cladosporium, Davidiellomyces, Graphiopsis, Neocladosporium, Rachicladosporium, Toxicocladosporium and Verrucocladosporium. They are reported on a wide range of hosts as endophytes, pathogens, and saprobes (Sandoval-Denis et al., 2016; Jayawardena et al., 2020). Members of Cladosporiaceae are commonly found on soil, food, paint, textiles, and other organic matters or colonize as secondary invaders leaf lesions caused by plant pathogenic fungi and common fungal components isolated from the air (Bensch et al., 2010).
Cladosporium Link
Cladosporium is a cosmopolitan genus isolated from diverse environments, including soil, food, paint, textiles, and plant pathogenic fungi, and is known to cause allergies and diseases in plants and animals (Bensch et al., 2012). It is the most common fungal component isolated from the air (French, 1989, Flannigan and Wotton, 2001). The small conidia of Cladosporium are typically formed in branched chains, facilitating their dispersion through the air. The Cladosporium species complex includes three major groups: C. herbarum, C. cladosporioides, and C. sphaerospermum (Bensch et al., 2012). The C. sphaerospermum complex is characterized by globose or subglobose, pigmented, almost smooth to verrucose terminal conidia and 0–3-septate, smooth, or verruculose ramoconidia (Ellis and Yates, 1971; Zalar et al., 2007). The C. cladosporioides complex exhibits significant variability, with conidia ranging from smooth or nearly so to irregularly verrucose, vereuuculose, or rough-walled. In contrast, all species within the C. herbarum complex have ornamented conidia with features ranging from minutely verruculose to verrucose, echinulate, or spiny (Torres-Cortés et al., 2015). In this study, we introduce one new species and two new host records within the C. cladosporioides species complex from Thailand. Phylogenetic analyses of Cladosporium are based on combined ITS, tef1-α, and act sequence data of selected Cladosporiaceae isolates. Related sequences were obtained from GenBank. There are 114 taxa included in the analyses, which comprise 2,745 characters including gaps. The tree is rooted in Cladosporium herbarum. The best-scoring RAxML tree with a final likelihood value of − 22,003.238457 is presented. The matrix had 1,285 distinct alignment patterns, with 60.03% of undetermined characters or gaps. Estimated base frequencies were as follows: A = 0.233071, C = 0.288405, G = 0.248984, T = 0.229540; substitution rates AC = 1.517403, AG = 3.134825, AT = 1.668455, CG = 1.130508, CT = 4.683471, GT = 1.000000; gamma distribution shape parameter α = 0.426819. Maximum likelihood bootstrap support values ≥ 60% (ML) and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.90 are given in the nodes. The scale bar indicates 0.2 changes. The isolates obtained in this study are in red, and ex-types taxa are in black bold (Supplementary Figure 5). In this analysis, Cladosporium dracaenae isolates from our collections clustered with Cladosporium dracaenicola and Cladosporium tenuissimum. To confirm the results from phylogenetic analyses, the PHI test was done. Results of the pairwise homoplasy index (PHI) test of Cladosporium dracaenae, Cladosporium dracaenicola, and closely related species were determined using both LogDet transformation and split decomposition. PHI test results (Φw) < 0.05 indicate significant recombination within the dataset. The new taxon is in red bold type. P=1 (Supplementary Figure 6). 328
Cladosporium dracaenae Chaiwan & Jayaward, sp. nov. (Supplementary Figure 7)
Index Fungorum number: IF 559789 Facesoffungi number: FoF10748
Etymology: Referring to the host genus on which the fungus was collected, Dracaena (Asparagaceae).
Holotype: MFLU 22–0185
Saprobic on dead leaves of Dracaena sp. Sexual morph: undetermined. Asexual morph: on PDA. Mycelium 2–4 μm wide ( = 3.2 μm; n = 30), hyphae branched, septate, often appearing somewhat darkened and not constrictions, irregular, hyaline to pale brown or pale olivaceous-brown, smooth, minutely verruculose, thin walls. Conidiophores 20–70 × 2–3 μm ( = 45 × 2.5 μm, n = 30), macronematous, arising laterally or terminally from hyphae, erect, straight to slightly flexuous, filiform to narrowly cylindrical 0–3-septate, septa often appearing darkened, sometimes pluriseptate with septa in short succession, especially toward the apex, septa not constricted, pale olivaceous-brown, smooth to minutely verruculose, thin walls or almost so, sometimes forming ramoconidia and fragments., unbranched or branched, brown occasionally slightly geniculate, non-nodulose. Conidiogenous cells undifferentiated or conidiophores reduced to conidiogenous cells, cylindrical, 4–18 μm long, usually neither geniculate nor nodulose, with a single or up to three protuberant, subdenticulate, thickened, and darkened. Conidiogenous scars thickened and conspicuous, protuberant. Ramoconidia rarely formed. A branch of a conidiophore at the base of branches having scar, having a truncate or slightly convex, to detached conidiogenous cells or short, fertile, terminal branches, and reclassified branched conidia. Conidia 12.5–16.5 × 2.5–3.0 μm ( = 20 × 2.5 μm; n = 30), catenate, in branched chains, conidial chains branching in all directions, terminal chains with up to nine conidia, small terminal conidia globose or subglobose, hyaline to dark brown, narrower at both ends, straight, guttulate.
Culture characteristics: Colonies on PDA reaching 20–40 mm diam after 2 weeks, olivaceous- gray brown to black, reverse olivaceous- gray to leaden- gray or olivaceous-black, velvety, powdery to felty-woolly, regular, glabrous or feathery, aerial mycelium absent or sparse, growth flat with a somewhat elevated colony center, without prominent exudates, sporulation profuse.
Material examined: Thailand, Chiang Rai Province, dead leaves of Dracaena sp. (Asparagaceae), 17 November 2017, Napalai Chaiwan, NCCR2, (MFLU 22–0185, holotype), ex-type living culture MFLUCC 18–0919.
GenBank accession numbers: NCCR2; ITS: OM908927, tef1-α: OP099913
Notes: In the phylogenetic analysis, our isolates form a monophyletic clade that is a sister clade to Cladosporium tenuissimum (Supplementary Figure 5). Morphologically, this collection is similar to Cladosporium tenuissimum (in Cladosporium cladosporioides complex) (Bensch et al., 2010). Base pair comparison of ITS with C. tenuissimum reveals 7 out of 719 (0.97%) nucleotide differences, that in act (with C. tenuissimum isolate XCWN2) shows 90 out of 515 (17.47%) differences, and that in tef1-α (with Cladosporium sp. isolate CW_T3L3C12.1) shows 8 out of 1230 (0.65%) differences, indicating that this is a distinct taxon (Jeewon and Hyde, 2016; Chethana et al., 2021; Jayawardena et al., 2021). Consequently, we identify this new species as C. dracaenae, reported from Dracaena spp. in Thailand. 367
Cladosporium dracaenicola Chaiwan & Jayaward, sp. nov. (Supplementary Figure 8)
Index Fungorum number: IF559789 Facesoffungi number: FoF10748
Etymology: Referring to the host genus on which the fungus was collected, Dracaena (Asparagaceae).
Holotype: MFLU 22-0186
Saprobic on dead leaves of Dracaena sp. Sexual morph: undetermined. Asexual morph: on PDA. Mycelium 2–4 μm wide ( = 3.2 μm; n = 30), hyphae branched, septate, often appearing somewhat darkened and not constrictions, irregular, hyaline to pale brown or pale olivaceous-brown, smooth, minutely verruculose, thin walls. Conidiophores 50–80 × 2–3 μm ( = 65 × 2.5 μm; n = 30), macronematous, arising laterally or terminally from hyphae, erect, straight to slightly flexuous, filiform to narrowly cylindrical 0–3-septate, septa often appearing darkened, sometimes pluriseptate with septa in short succession, especially toward the apex, septa not constricted, pale olivaceous-brown, smooth to minutely verruculose, thin walls or almost so, sometimes forming ramoconidia and fragments., unbranched or branched, brown occasionally slightly geniculate, non-nodulose. Conidiogenous cells undifferentiated or conidiophores reduced to conidiogenous cells, cylindrical, 4–18 μm long, usually neither geniculate nor nodulose, with a single or up to three protuberant, subdenticulate, thickened, and darkened. Conidiogenous scars thickened and conspicuous, protuberant. Ramoconidia rarely formed. Ramoconidia 6–12 × 2–3 μm ( = 8.5 × 2.5 μm; n = 30), a branch of a conidiophore at the base of branches having scar, having a truncate or slightly convex, to detached conidiogenous cells or short, fertile, terminal branches, and reclassified branched conidia. Conidia 5–6 × 2.5–3 μm ( = 5.5 × 2.5 μm; n = 30), catenate, in branched chains, conidial chains branching in all directions, terminal chains with up to nine conidia, small terminal conidia globose or subglobose, hyaline to dark brown, narrower at both ends, straight, guttulate.
Culture characteristics: Colonies on PDA reaching 20–40 mm diam after 2 weeks, olivaceous, gray olivaceous or olivaceous-gray, reverse olivaceous- gray to leaden- gray or olivaceous-black, velvety, powdery to felty-wooly, margins white, regular, glabrous or feathery, aerial mycelium absent or sparse, growth flat with a somewhat elevated colony center, without prominent exudates, sporulation profuse.
Material examined: Thailand, Songkhla Province, Hat Yai District, dead leaves of Dracaena sp. (Asparagaceae), 5 September 2018, Napalai Chaiwan, TNC6, (MFLU 22–0186, holotype), ex-type living culture MFLUCC 18–0915.
GenBank accession numbers: TNC6; ITS: OM908928.
Notes: In the phylogenetic analysis, our isolates formed a monophyletic clade and are a sister clade to Cladosporium tenuissimum (Supplementary Figure 5). Morphologically, this collection resembles Cladosporium cladosporioides (within the Cladosporium cladosporioides complex) (Bensch et al., 2010). Comparison of ITS nucleotides with C. halotolerans (CBS127371) reveals 8 out of 594 (1.3%) nucleotide differences, whereas comparison with C. dracaenae (MFLU 22-0185) shows 18 out of 594 (3%) nucleotide differences, indicating that they are distinct taxa. Our species showed conidiophores (65 × 2.5 μm) smaller than Cladosporium tenuissimum up to (310 × 460 µm). Also, Ramoconidia (8.5 × 2.5) our strain smaller than Cladosporium tenuissimum (22 × 41 µm). Consequently, we identify the new species as C. dracaenicola, which has been reported from Dracaena sp. in Thailand.
Mycosphaerellales (Nannf.) P.F. Cannon.
Mycosphaerellales was introduced based on phylogenetic analyses by Schoch et al. (2006), Hyde et al. (2024) recognized 11 families within Mycosphaerellales (Aeminiaceae, Cystocoleaceae, Dissoconiaceae, Extremaceae, Mycosphaerellaceae, Neodevriesiaceae, Phaeothecoidiellaceae, Phillipsiellaceae, Schizothyriaceae, Teratosphaeriaceae, and Xenodevriesiaceae) (Norimova et al., 2024; Piątek et al., 2024; Hyde et al., 2024). Mostly plant-associated fungi, with a significant number being plant pathogens, endophytes, or saprobes (Norimova et al., 2024; Piątek et al., 2024).
Mycosphaerellaceae Lindau
Wijayawardene et al. (2022) recognized 119 genera within Mycosphaerellaceae. Hongsanan et al. (2020) listed 106 genera as doubtful within Mycosphaerellaceae, based on the work of Videira et al. (2017).
Zasmidium Fr.
Zasmidium is a genus within Mycosphaerellaceae, established by Fries in (1849). Zasmidium cellare is the type species of this genus (Zhao et al., 2016; Arzanlou et al., 2007). Species of Zasmidium have been reported from various plant hosts (Shivas et al., 2010; Crous et al., 2014; Quaedvlieg et al., 2014). In this study, we report a new record of Zasmidium citrigriseum from Thailand. For Zasmidium, the phylogram was generated from RAxML analysis based on combined LSU, ITS, and act sequence data of selected Zasmidium isolates. Related sequences were obtained from GenBank. There are 27 taxa included in the analyses, which comprise 2,044 characters including gaps. The tree is rooted in Pseudozasmidium eucalypti (CBS121101). The best-scoring RAxML tree with a final likelihood value of − 6,614.766180 is presented. The matrix had 454 distinct alignment patterns, with 33.32% of undetermined characters or gaps. Estimated base frequencies were as follows: A = 0.232177, C = 0.263299, G = 0.287808, T = 0.216717; substitution rates AC = 1.575049, AG = 2.045497, AT = 1.643817, CG = 1.149239, CT = 5.459635, GT = 1.000000; gamma distribution shape parameter α = 0.144082. Maximum likelihood bootstrap support values ≥ 60% (ML) and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.90 are given in the nodes. The scale bar indicates 0.04 changes. The isolates obtained in this study are in red, and ex-types taxa are in black bold (Supplementary Figure 9). In this analysis, our collection clustered with 83% ML and 0.93 PP of Zasmidium citrigriseum.
Zasmidium citrigriseum (F.E. Fisher) U. Braun & Crous [as “citri-griseum”], IMA Fungus 5(2): 337–442 (2014) (Supplementary Figure 10)
Index Fungorum number: IF 622149
Saprobic on dead leaves of Dracaena sp. Sexual morph: see Crous et al. (2014). Asexual morph: Mycelium external, smooth, septate, branched, with wide hyphae. Conidiophores micronematous, arising from superficial mycelium, solitary, erect, straight to slightly curved, branched laterally or unbranched, medium to dark brown, slightly wider at the base. Conidiogenous cells terminal, cylindrical to subcylindrical, tapering to a flattened apical region, smooth to finely verruculose, medium brown, measuring 20 × 60 µm; scars thickened, somewhat darkened, 2–2.5 µm wide. Conidia broadly fusiform to obovoid, 0–1-septate, pale olivaceous, paler toward the apex; terminal conidia ovoid, 0-septate, pale olivaceous to hyaline, paler toward the apex, with a truncate base extending up to 5 µm wide on each side, tapering toward the polar ends.
Culture characteristics: Colonies on PDA reaching 2–4 cm diameter after 2 weeks. Young colonies are olivaceous-brown, darkening with age. The reverse is olivaceous-brown to leaden- gray or olivaceous-black. Texture ranges from velvety and powdery to felty-wooly.
Material examined: Thailand, Nakhon Si Thammarat Province, Cha-uat District, on dead leaves of Dracaena sp., 19 December 2018, Napalai Chaiwan, specimen NSW1 (MFLU 22-0189); living culture MFLUCC 18–0903.
Known distribution: Vietnam, Thailand, USA. Also reported from Acacia confusa, Albizia chinensis, Magnolia candollii, Podocarpus macrophyllus (China) (Dou et al., 2017; de Silva et al., 2019), Mangifera indica (Thailand) (Trakunyingcharoen et al., 2014), and dead leaves of Dracaena fragrans (this study).
GenBank accession numbers: ITS: OM919719, LSU: OM919720, act: OP099914
Notes: Zasmidium citrigriseum has been reported from various hosts in different countries, including Musa in America, Acacia in Thailand, Eucalyptus in Vietnam, and Aeglopsis, Citrus, Fortunella, Murraya, and Poncirus in North and South America (Crous et al., 2019; Pretorius et al., 2003). In our study, we identified the same fungus in Thailand on Dracaena sp. A BLASTn search of GenBank showed that the LSU sequence had 99.42% similarity with Zasmidium anthuriicola (no nucleotide differences in the aligned region), confirming our strain as a new host record of Zasmidium citrigriseum from Dracaena in Thailand.
Pleosporales Luttr. ex M.E. Barr
Pleosporales is one of the most species-rich orders within the class Dothideomycetes, encompassing species that inhabit a wide range of ecosystems, including terrestrial, freshwater, and marine environments (Phookamsak et al., 2014, 2017; Bakhshi et al., 2019; Jones et al., 2019a, b; Luo et al., 2019; Tennakoon et al., 2019). Hongsanan et al. (2020) and Wijayawardene et al. (2022) recognized 91 genera within Pleosporales. The family Paralophiostomataceae was introduced into this order by Hongsanan et al. (2020).
Didymellaceae Gruyter, Aveskamp & Verkley
Hyde et al. (2024) recognized 44 genera within Didymellaceae. Taxa in this family are known to cause plant diseases, including leaf and stem blight, which can lead to plant death (Wanasinghe et al., 2018; Phukhamsakda et al., 2020, Wijayawardene et al., 2022).
Longididymella L.W. Hou, L. Cai & Crou
The type species of Longididymella, originally described as Phoma clematidina on Clematis ligusticifolia (causing necrotic leaf spot), was characterized by both its sexual and asexual morphs (Woudenberg et al., 2009). The new combination Longididymella clematidis was synonymized by Hou et al. (2020) from Anthodidymella clematidis and proposed as Didymella clematidis (CBS 123705) (Phukhamsakda et al., 2020). Longididymella species are saprobic or necrotic and commonly occur on flowering and herbaceous plants. Previously, this species was introduced from Clematis plants in the USA (Woudenberg et al., 2009; Phukhamsakda et al., 2020). In this study, we isolated the asexual morph of Longididymella clematidis from Dracaena sp. in Thailand. Phylogenetic analysis of Longididymella was generated from RAxML analysis based on combined LSU sequence data of selected Didymellaceae isolates. Related sequences were obtained from GenBank. There are 28 taxa are included in the analyses, which comprise 1,354 characters including gaps. The tree is rooted to Calophoma complanate (CBS 268.92). The best- scoring RAxML tree with a final likelihood value of − 1,470.814319 is presented. The matrix had 42 distinct alignment patterns, with 4.19% of undetermined characters or gaps. Estimated base frequencies were as follows: A = 0.254580, C = 0.209195, G = 0.302369, T = 0.233856; substitution rates AC = 2,406.556015, AG = 21,439.684114, AT = 2,181.215287, CG = 2,016.393030, CT = 45,321.905016, GT = 1.000000; gamma distribution shape parameter α = 0.020000. Maximum likelihood bootstrap support values ≥ 60% (ML) and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.90 are given in the nodes. The scale bar indicates 0.002 changes. The isolates obtained in this study are in red and ex-types taxa are in black bold (Supplementary Figure 11). In this analysis, our collections clustered with Longididymella clematidis CBS123705.
Longididymella clematidis (Woudenb., Spiers & Gruyter) L.W. Hou, L. Cai & Crous, in Hou, Groenewald, Pfenning, Yarden, Crous & Cai, Stud. Mycol. 96: 339 (2020) (Supplementary Figure 12)
Index Fungorum number: IF833503
Basionym: Didymella clematidis Woudenb., Spiers & Gruyter in Woudenberg et al., Persoonia 22:60 (2009)
Saprobic on dead leaves of Dracaena sp. Sexual morph: Undetermined. Asexual morph: Conidiomata 50–400 × 80–350 μm ( = 225 × 215 μm; n = 5), pycnidial, solitary, sometimes aggregated, uniloculate, immersed under epidermal layer, subglobose to depressed, coriaceous thin-walled, brown to dark brown, with ostiolate. Ostioles not observe. Conidiomatal wall 10–30 μm wide, of two to five layers, each cell-layer 10 μm wide, light- brown to brown cells of textura globulosa, heavily pigmented in the outer layers, lined with a hyaline innermost layer bearing conidiogenous cells. Conidiophores reduced to conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells 2.5–4.5 × 1.5–3.5 μm ( = 3.5 × 2.5 μm; n = 20), phialidic, determinate, discrete, ampulliform, cylindrical to sub-cylindrical, smooth-walled, hyaline, arising from the inner layer of conidioma. Conidia 2–3 × 4–8 μm ( = 2.5 × 6 μm; n = 50), oblong or oval, slightly curved toward the ends, rounded ends, with 1(–2) guttules in each cell, hyaline, aseptate, smooth-walled.
Culture characteristics: Colonies on PDA reaching 2–4 cm diam after 7 days dark-brown color, reverse dark-brown to black, margins white, regular aerial mycelium, growth flat with a somewhat elevated colony Center, without prominent exudates, sporulation profuse.
Material examined: Thailand, Tak Province, Umphang District, on dead leaves of Dracaena sp., 21 August 2019, Napalai Chaiwan, Umpangsoil2 (MFLU 22-0187), living culture MFLUCC 22-0099. Host and Distribution: Clematis ligusticifolia (Woudenberg et al., 2009), Dracaena sp. (This study). USA (Woudenberg et al., 2009), Thailand (This study).
GenBank accession numbers: LSU: ON000548.
Notes: Longididymella clematidis (MFLU 22-0187) has been previously reported causing leaf spots on Clematis ligusticifolia (Woudenberg et al., 2009). Our strain represents a new host record (Phukhamsakda et al., 2020; Woudenberg et al., 2009). A BLASTn search of GenBank revealed that the LSU sequence of our strain has 99.54% similarity (5/908 = 0.55% nucleotide differences) to Longididymella clematidis (CBS123705). Our species is characterized by pseudothecial, globose, subglobose to pyriform ascomata, cylindrical asci with club-shaped bases and hyaline, septate, ovate to obpyriform ascospores. Conidiomata pycnidial, solitary, sometimes aggregated, uniloculate, immersed under the epidermal layer, brown to dark brown. Based on these, we identify this strain as a new host record for Longididymella clematidis.
Pleosporaceae Nitschke
Hyde et al. (2024) accepted 23 genera in Pleosporaceae comprising Allonecte, Alternaria, Bipolaris, Clathrospora, Comoclathris, Curvularia, Decorospora, Diademosa, Dichotomophthora, Exserohilum, Extrawettsteinina, Gibbago, Johnalcornia, Paradendryphiella, Platysporoides, Pleoseptum, Porocercospora, Prathoda, Pseudoyuconia, Pyrenophora (= Marielliottia), Tamaricicola, and Typhicola. Pleosporaceae taxa occur as saprobes and plant pathogens.
Bipolaris Shoemaker
Bipolaris species are plant pathogens with a global distribution (Hongsanan et al., 2020; Ferdinandez et al., 2022, 2024). They are commonly reported on a variety of plant diseases, including leaf spots, leaf blights, root rots, and other symptoms in field crops (Manamgoda et al., 2014). Bipolaris species are characterized by dematiaceous hyphomycetous fungi that produce pale- brown to dark- brown asexual conidia and conidiophores. In this study, we present a new record of Bipolaris from a different host in Thailand. Phylogenetic analyses of Bipolaris were done using RAxML analysis based on combined ITS and tef1-α sequence data of selected Pleosporaceae isolates. Related sequences were obtained from GenBank. There are 23 taxa included in the analyses, which comprise 1,537 characters including gaps. The tree is rooted to Curvularia lunata. The best-scoring RAxML tree with a final likelihood value of − 2,674.255709 is presented. The matrix had 139 distinct alignment patterns, with 15.20% of undetermined characters or gaps. Estimated base frequencies were as follows: A = 0.218186, C = 0.246306, G = 0.288802, T = 0.246706; substitution rates AC = 0.763615, AG = 5.761060, AT = 2.722841, CG = 0.695515, CT = 2.038141, GT = 1.000000; gamma distribution shape parameter α = 0.020000. Maximum likelihood bootstrap support values ≥60% (ML) and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.90 are given in the nodes. The scale bar indicates 0.02 changes. The isolates obtained in this study are in red and ex-type taxa are in black bold (Supplementary Figure 13). In this analysis, our collections clustered with Bipolaris coffeana (BRIP14845).
Bipolaris coffeana Sivan., Trans. Br. mycol. Soc. 84(3): 404 (1985) (Supplementary Figure 14)
Index Fungorum number: IF105089
Saprobic on dead leaves of Dracaena sp. Sexual morph: Undetermined. Asexual morph: Vegetative hyphae septate, subhyaline to brown, branched, smooth, 3–4 μm in width. Colonies on PDA reaching approximately 4–6 cm in diameter after 7 days at 25°C, surface funiculose, margin fimbriate, olivaceous black to olivaceous grey, velvety with sparse aerial mycelium. Conidiophores erect, often branched, in most cases uniformly brown, sometimes pale brown at apex, arising singly, septate, flexuous, in most cases geniculate toward the apex, up to 210 μm long, 3–4 μm wide, generally wide in basal parts, tapering in median and upper parts, straight or flexuous, geniculate in apex, frequently unbranched, cells walls thicker than those of the vegetative hyphae, pale brown to brown, basal cells sometimes swollen. Conidiogenous cells mostly integrated, terminal, or intercalary with sympodial proliferation, smooth, brown, mono- or polytretic. Conidia with bipolar germination, four-celled, smooth- walled or slightly verruculose, asymmetrically swollen and curved at the third cell from base, rarely symmetric swelling and straight, pale to dark brown, end cells paler and thin-walled than central cells, ellipsoidal to clavate to obovoid, asymmetrical with paler end cells, usually curved at the third cell from the base, (80–110 × 10–18 μm, 3-distoseptate, hila slightly protuberant, thickened and darkened. Chlamydospores with verruculose nodes, terminal or intercalary, proliferating sympodially, with circular and thickened scars, brown, cylindrical to swollen.
Culture characteristics: Colonies growing on PDA 4–6 cm diam after 8 d days of incubation at 25°C, circular with filiform margin, dark green to greenish-black, aerial mycelium sparse to moderate, floccose with age; reverse greyish green to brownish black.
Material examined: Thailand, Chiang Rai Province, Mea Lao district, on dead leaves of Dracaena sp., 17 November 2017, Napalai Chaiwan, DNC1.1 (living culture MFLUCC 17–2600).
Host and distribution: Bouteloua gracilis, Coffea arabica (Kenya) (Tan et al., 2014), Cynodon dactylon (New Zealand) (Manamgoda et al., 2012), Digitaria sp. (Poaceae) (USDA fungal host data base) —Dracaena fragrans Thailand, USA (Jeon et al., 2015, This study).
GenBank accession numbers: ITS: OP090572, tef1-α: OP099915.
Notes: Bipolaris coffeana has been reported from Coffea arabica in Kenya (Tan et al., 2014) and also from Bouteloua gracilis and Cynodon dactylon. The combined phylogenetic analysis of the Bipolaris generic complex in this study shows that our strain has high bootstrap support with Bipolaris coffeana. This section includes descriptions and illustrations of the new host record based on molecular and morphological data (Ferdinandez et al., 2022). This species is characterized by fusiform shaped conidia, central cells not much darker but broader than the distal ones. This is the first report of Bipolaris coffeana isolated from Dracaena fragrans in Thailand.
Curvularia Boedijn
Curvularia species are significant pathogens reported globally. They have been identified as plant pathogenic fungi and have also been associated with animal and human diseases (Kusai et al., 2016). Previously, the classification of Curvularia species was unclear due to a lack of molecular data, and the genus exhibits overlapping morphological characteristics with Bipolaris (Manamgoda et al., 2012). In this study, we present a new host record for Curvularia lunata from Thailand. Phylogenetic analyses of Curvularia were based on ITS sequence data of selected Pleosporaceae isolates. Related sequences were obtained from GenBank. There are 92 taxa included in the analyses, which comprise 694 characters including gaps. The tree is rooted with Cochliobolus nisikadoi. The best-scoring RAxML tree with a final likelihood value of −4,650.452400 is presented. The matrix had 358 distinct alignment patterns, with 26.96% of undetermined characters or gaps. Estimated base frequencies were as follows: A = 0.236630, C = 0.245701, G = 0.229962, T = 0.287707; substitution rates AC = 1.587196, AG = 2.075234, AT = 1.262201, CG = 1.663658, CT = 3.666320, GT = 1.000000; gamma distribution shape parameter α = 0.245992. Maximum likelihood bootstrap support values ≥ 60% (ML) and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.90 are given in the nodes. The scale bar indicates 0.03 changes. The isolates obtained in this study are in red and ex-type taxa are in black bold (Supplementary Figure 15). In this analysis, our collections clustered with 88% ML and 1 PP with Curvularia lunata (CBS730.96).
Curvularia lunata (Wakker) Boedijn, Bull. Jard. bot. Buitenz, 3 Sér. 13(1): 127 (1933) (Supplementary Figure 16)
Index Fungorum number: IF269889
Saprobic on dead leaves of Dracaena sp. Sexual morph: Undetermined. Asexual morph: Conidiophores 155–160 × 60–70 μm ( = 157 × 65 μm; n = 10), arising occasionally singly or usually in groups, branched, septate, straight, geniculate at upper part, brown to pale reddish, lighter toward apex. Conidiogenous nodes dark brown, smooth. Conidia 159–165 × 70–75 μm ( = 162 × 72 μm; n = 30), smooth-walled, straight or curved, subcylindrical to fusoid, sometimes narrowly clavate, tapering toward rounded apex, basal cell obconic, pale brown to mid reddish brown, 3–4- distoseptate. Hilum inconspicuous, germination bipolar.
Culture characteristics: Colonies growing on PDA 4–6 cm diam after 8 d days of incubation at 25°C, circular with filiform margin, white or cream, aerial mycelium sparse to moderate, floccose with age; reverse brownish to brown.
Material examined: Thailand, Kanchanaburi Province, on dead leaves of Dracaena sp., 27 June 2019, Napalai Chaiwan, KAN20 (living culture MFLUCC 22-0076).
Host and Distribution: Adhatoda sp., Agave sisalana, Agrostis palustris, Allium cepa, Allium sativum, Alnus rubra, Aloe vera, Amaranthus spinosus, Anacardium occidentale, Ananas comosus, Andropogon sorghum var. sudanensis, Anthephora hermaphrodita, Arachis hypogaea, Areca catechu, Artocarpus integra, Axonopus affinis, Bambusa vulgaris, Boehmeria nivea, Brachiaria mutica, Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis, Cajanus cajan, Capsicum annuum var. annuum, Capsicum frutescens, Citrus reticulata, Dactyloctenium aegyptium, Dendrocalamus strictus, Digitaria ischaemum, Echinochloa colona, Eleusine indica, Eucalyptus globulus, Fragaria ananassa, Gladiolus hortulanus, Halophila ovalis, Helianthus annuus, Impatiens sultanii, Ipomoea batatas, Legenaria vulgaris, Linum usitatissimum, Lolium multiflorum, Mangifera indica, Rosa sp., Zea mays (Farr and Rossman, 2025) —of Dracaena sp., (This study). Australia, Brazil, California, China, Cuba, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Mauritius, Myanmar, Thailand, USA, and Virginia (Farr and Rossman, 2024).
GenBank accession numbers: ITS: OP090556.
Notes: Curvularia lunata is the type species of the genus (Boedijn, 1933). It was originally reported from Saccharum officinarum (sugar cane) in Java and is also known to cause leaf spots on Clerodendrum indicum, an important medicinal plant (Mukherjee et al., 2013), as well as on Zea mays, leading to significant yield losses (Li et al., 2006; Manamgoda et al., 2012). There have been reports of Curvularia lunata from unknown grasses in Thailand (Manamgoda et al., 2014; Tan et al., 2016). In this study, we isolated Curvularia lunata (KAN20) from Dracaena sp., a plant substrate in Thailand in 2018. This culture is undergoing sporulation. Many strains of C. lunata are misidentified in GenBank (Cai et al., 2011), and accurate identification of the type sequences for Curvularia species has been recently reported by Bhunjun et al. (2020).
Torulaceae Nitschke
In 1794, Persoon introduced the genus Torula with T. herbarum as the type species (Persoon, 1794). Members of Torulaceae are commonly found as saprobes on various terrestrial plants and submerged decaying wood in rivers or streams (Su et al., 2018). Torulaceae species reported only in their asexual morphs, characterized by micro- or macronematous conidiophores that are erect from the host or aerial, and connected to doliform or ellipsoid, brown, smooth to verruculose conidia (Yang et al., 2022). There are seven genera associated with this family (Wijayawardene et al., 2022).
Torula Pers.
The type species of this genus is Torula herbarum was designated from a neotype (CPC 24114) (Crous et al., 2015). The members of Torula are mainly characterized by terminal or lateral, monoblastic, or polyblastic conidiogenous cells which have a basally thickened and heavily melanized wall, with the apex thin-walled and frequently collapsing and becoming coronate (Crane and Miller, 2016). Torula has over 500 epithets in Index Fungorum (2025). In the present study, we introduce a new species of Torula from dead leaves of Dracaena sp. from Thailand. Phylogenetic analyses of Torulaceae was based on combined ITS, LSU, SSU, and rpb2 sequence data of selected Torulaceae isolates. Related sequences were obtained from GenBank. There are 44 taxa included in the analyses, which comprise 864 characters including gaps. The tree is rooted to Dendryphion europaeum (CPC23231). The best-scoring RAxML tree with a final likelihood value of − 7,716.685771 is presented. The matrix had 517 distinct alignment patterns, with 31.01% of undetermined characters or gaps. Estimated base frequencies were as follows; A = 0.249849, C = 0.244700, G = 0.278439, T = 0.227012; substitution rates AC = 2.770901, AG = 3.096398, AT = 2.134703, CG = 1.838546, CT = 7.075441, GT = 1.000000; gamma distribution shape parameter α = 0.312119. Maximum likelihood bootstrap support values ≥ 60% (ML) and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.90 are given in the nodes. The scale bar indicates 0.03 changes. The isolates obtained in this study are in red and ex-type taxa are in black bold (Supplementary Figure 17).
In this analysis, our collections clustered with 100% ML and 1 PP of T. breviconidiophora KUMCC 18–0130 and 70% ML and 1.00 PP of T. chromolaenae (KUMCC 16-0036). This analysis was further confirmed with PHI test. Results of the pairwise homoplasy index (PHI) test of Torula dracaenae and closely related species using both LogDet transformation and splits decomposition. PHI test results (Φw) < 0.05 indicate significant recombination within the dataset. The new taxon is in red bold type. P=0.1959 (Supplementary Figure 18). Based on these, we introduce our collection as a new species Dracaena sp.
Torula dracaenae Chaiwan & Jayaward, sp. nov. (Supplementary Figure 19).
Index Fungorum number: IF559437 Facesoffungi number: FoF10752
Etymology: Referring to the host genus from which the fungus was collected: Dracaena (Asparagaceae).
Holotype: MFLU 22-0135
Saprobic on dead leaves of Dracaena sp. Sexual morph: undetermined. Asexual morph: Colonies effuse on host, black, powdery. Mycelium partly immersed, composed of septate, branched, smooth, pale- brown hyphae. Conidiophores (2.8–)3–4.3 × 2.5–3 μm ( = 3.8 × 2.8 μm; n = 10), macronematous, mononematous, solitary, erect, pale brown, verruculose, thick-walled, consisting of one to two cells or reduced to conidiogenous cells, subcylindrical to subglobose, arising from prostrate hypha. Conidiogenous cells (3–)3.2–3.5 × 3.8–4.6 μm ( = 3.4 × 4.1 μm; n = 10), polyblastic, terminal, dark brown to black, smooth to minutely verruculose, thick-walled, doliiform to ellipsoid. Conidia 10–15 × 3.0–4.5 μm ( = 13 × 3 μm; n = 20) solitary to catenate, acrogenous, simple, phragmosporous, dark brown, with apical cell pale brown, minutely verruculose, 3–10-septate, rounded at both ends, composed of subglobose cells, slightly constricted at some septa, chiefly subcylindrical, rough-walled.
Material examined: Thailand, Kanchanaburi Province, on dead stems of Dracaena sp., 20 March 2017, Napalai Chaiwan, KAN2, (MFLU 22-0135, holotype).
GenBank accession numbers: LSU: OM911934; ITS: OM911931.
Notes: Phylogenetic analysis of our collection grouped it with Torula chromolaenae and T. mackenziei, showing a close relationship to T. breviconidiophora (Supplementary Figure 17). Our strain clustered with T. breviconidiophora with strong bootstrap support (100% ML, 1 PP, Supplementary Figure 17). Morphologically, our collection differs from T. mackenziei and T. breviconidiophora but is similar to T. chromolaenae. Its conidiophores (3.8 × 2.8 μm) and conidiogenous cells (3.4 × 4.1 μm) are smaller than those of T. chromolaenae (5.8 × 4 μm and 4.7 × 5.4 μm, respectively). Additionally, its conidia (13 × 3 μm) are smaller than those of T. chromolaenae (14.5 × 4.3 μm). We were unable to obtain a culture as the spores did not germinate. A BLASTn search of GenBank showed that the ITS sequence of our strain has 98.45% similarity to T. chromolaenae. The ITS nucleotides reveal 12/729 (1.64%) differences, LSU nucleotides show 1/978 (0.1%) differences, and the SSU nucleotides show 64/1090 (5.87%) differences indicating that they are distinct taxa (Jeewon and Hyde, 2016; Pem et al., 2024). The PHI test for closely related species showed a P-value of 0.2078, indicating no significant evidence of recombination. Based on the phylogenetic support, we introduce our isolate as a new species from Dracaena sp. in Thailand.
Venturiales Y. Zhang ter, C.L. Schoch & K.D. Hyde
Wijayawardene et al. (2022) recognized three families within the order Venturiales: Cylindrosympodiaceae, Sympoventuriaceae, and Venturiaceae. Shen et al. (2020) introduced Cylindrosympodiaceae with eight genera: Bellamyces, Fagicola, Fraxinicola, Neofusicladium, Parafusicladium, Fuscohilum, Pinaceicola, and Sterila. However, Wijayawardene et al. (2022) included only Cylindrosympodium, Pseudoanungitea, Septonema, Sympodiella, and Tothia in this family.
Sympoventuriaceae Y. Zhang ter, C.L. Schoch & K.D. Hyde
Wijayawardene et al. (2022) recognized 17 genera in Sympoventuriaceae. Members of Sympoventuriaceae are often opportunistic pathogens of vertebrates in natural habitats (Dwivedi, 1959, Barron and Busch, 1962, Hoog et al., 2000) and have also been implicated in human infections (Salkin et al., 1994; Padhye et al., 1994; Singh et al., 2006; Yarita et al., 2007; Ge et al., 2009).
Ochroconis de Hoog & Arx
Wijayawardene et al. (2022) recognized 28 species in the genus Ochroconis, with Ochroconis constricta serving as the type species. These species are characterized by sympodial conidiogenesis and septate, ellipsoidal conidia that are released rhexolytically. In this study, we report a new record of Ochroconis musae from Thailand. Hylogenetic analysis of Ochroconis was based on combined LSU, ITS, and tub sequence data of selected Didymellaceae isolates. Related sequences were obtained from GenBank. There are 28 taxa included in the analyses, which comprise 2,385 characters including gaps. The tree is rooted to Verruconis calidifluminalis (CBS125818). The best-scoring RAxML tree with a final likelihood value of − 17,388.241509 is presented. The matrix had 1,158 distinct alignment patterns, with 21.98% of undetermined characters or gaps. Estimated base frequencies were as follows; A = 0.232186, C = 0.241611, G = 0.316968, T = 0.209236; substitution rates AC = 0.942091, AG = 1.876611, AT = 1.006528, CG = 1.020611, CT = 3.796142, GT = 1.000000; gamma distribution shape parameter α = 0.257007. Maximum likelihood bootstrap support values ≥ 60% (ML) and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.90 are given in the nodes. The scale bar indicates 0.08 changes. The isolates obtained in this study are in red and ex- type taxa are in black bold (Supplementary Figure 20). In this analysis, our collections clustered with Ochroconis musae CBS729.95 and (MFLU 17-2598).
Ochroconis musae (G.Y. Sun & Lu Hao) Samerp. & de Hoog, Mycol. Progr. 14(no. 6): 8 (2015) (Supplementary Figure 21)
Index Fungorum number: IF808843
Saprobic on dead leaves of Dracaena sp. Sexual morph: Undetermined. Asexual morph: Hyphae effusae, pallide brunneae vel brunneae. Mycelium mostly superficiale, immersed, branched septate, pale olive, 1.0–1.5 μm wide. Conidiophores 0–3-septata, arising directly from aerial hyphae, straight or slightly flexuous, pale olivaceous brown, smooth, denticulate, solitary. Conidiogenous cells sympodial, denticulate, denticles thread-like, 0.5×1.0 μm, breaking between conidia and conidiogenous cells. Conidia 9–13 × 2–3 μm ( = 11 × 2.5 μm; n = 20) solitary, subcylindrical, pale brown, smooth, with the distal end obtuse and proximal end slightly tapered, bearing a minute denticle, clearly 1-septate in the middle, guttulate, conspicuously constricted at the septum.
Culture characteristics: On PDA, colonies 25–30 mm in diameter after 2 weeks, flat, moderately expanding, smooth, dry, flat. The center is white or beige, the margin is grayish brown to dark brown, submerged colony margin, reverse as dark brown in the central portion, not producing pigmentation in agar, hyphae sub-hyaline to pale brown, smooth- and thick-walled, sporulated after 3 weeks.
Material examined: Thailand, Tak Province, Umphang District, on dead leaves of Dracaena sp., 23 August 2019, Napalai Chaiwan, poppra5.1 (MFLU 22–0188), living culture MFLUCC 22-0105.
Known distribution: Musa basjoo (Samerpitak et al., 2015), Persea americana (Crous et al., 2019), Dracaena sp (Hyde et al., 2020). China (Samerpitak et al., 2015), Thailand (Crous et al., 2019; Hyde et al., 2020, This study).
GenBank accession numbers: ITS: ON159737; LSU: ON159739; tub: ON184274.
Notes: Ochroconis musae has previously been recorded from Musa basjoo (Samerpitak et al., 2015). Our isolate, collected from Dracaena sp. in Thailand, grouped with other Ochroconis musae strains in a monophyletic clade with 88% ML support in the phylogenetic analysis (Supplementary Figure 20). Thus, we identify this collection as a new host record of O. musae from Dracaena sp. in Thailand.
4 Discussion
This study provides morphological descriptions and phylogenetic analyses of 11 fungal taxa isolated from Dracaena species associated with limestone outcrops in Thailand. We describe three new species (Cladosporium dracaenae, C. dracaenicola, and Torula dracaenae), identify seven new host records (Bipolaris coffeana, Curvularia lunata, Lasiodiplodia bruguierae, L. lignicola, L. thailandica, Longididymella clematidis, and Zasmidium citrigriseum), and report a new collection of Ochroconis musae. These findings considerably expand current knowledge on microfungi associated with Dracaena in Thailand.
Our collection represents five fungal orders and among these, Botryosphaeriales and Cladosporiales were predominant, aligning with previous research highlighting their common association with woody substrates and their prevalence in tropical and subtropical habitats (Hyde et al., 2005; Marques et al., 2013; Gomdola et al., 2024; Pereira et al., 2024; Slippers et al., 2024). Members of Botryosphaeriaceae, in particular, are frequently recognized as pathogens, endophytes, or saprobes on woody plants and have been recently reported from limestone-rich habitats (Dissanayake et al., 2021; Zhang et al., 2023). For instance, Botryosphaeria guttulata was first described from limestone geology in Guizhou Province, China (Chen et al., 2020), suggesting potential ecological adaptations of Botryosphaeriaceae to extreme environments. It is noteworthy to further explore these ecological roles and their adaptation mechanisms within limestone habitats. In the current study, we introduced two new Cladosporium species viz. C. dracaenae and C. dracaenicola. Cladosporium species are ubiquitous fungi commonly associated with biodeterioration processes of limestone substrates, particularly in humid and temperate regions (Nováková, 2009; Trovão et al., 2020). Notably, species such as Cladosporium cladosporioides and C. tenuissimum have been documented to produce calcium oxalate crystals and acidic metabolites, respectively (Burford et al., 2003; Waqas et al., 2013), facilitating mineral transformations and potentially compromising structural integrity of limestone substrates. Thus, future studies should investigate the potential industrial and ecological impacts of these newly described Cladosporium species isolated from limestone environments.
Comparing our findings with earlier records, Thongkantha et al. (2008) documented fungal saprobes and pathogens associated with Dracaena lourieri in Thailand, largely relying on phylogenetic analyses from baited and natural substrates, with limited morphological integration. Our investigation aligns with several previous reports while providing clearer taxonomic identification and integrating comprehensive morphological and molecular approaches. For instance, Ochroconis musae, previously reported from bananas in China and Dracaena in Thailand (Hyde et al., 2020), was also isolated herein, confirming its broader host range. Similarly, although Torula herbarum has been recorded on Dracaena (Li et al., 2017), we distinguish and introduce Torula dracaenae as a new species. Additionally, we reconfirmed Curvularia lunata (previously reported by Peregrine and Ahmed, 1982) and reported Bipolaris coffeana as a novel association with Dracaena. Despite Braun et al. (2014) reporting Zasmidium dracaenae on Dracaena, we document Z. citrigriseum as a new host record in Thailand. Lasiodiplodia thailandica, previously reported from Mangifera indica in Thailand, is herein reported along with new host records of L. bruguierae and L. lignicola from Dracaena. Longididymella clematidis, earlier known only from Clematis ligusticifolia in the USA, represents both a new host and geographical record in this study.
Our results demonstrate significant diversity within the fungal community associated with Dracaena species in limestone outcrops in Thailand. Earlier studies often lacked precise identification due to insufficient molecular data. Therefore, future recollections and detailed phylogenetic reassessments are crucial. Biochemical characterization of fungal taxa from limestone habitats would be valuable, given their potential ecological roles and biotechnological applications. Future research should prioritize understanding the ecological contributions and adaptation strategies of fungi colonizing limestone ecosystems.
Data availability statement
The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/Supplementary Material.
Author contributions
NC: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. ST: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. RJ: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. DW: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. IM: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. DM: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. IP: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. KH: Supervision, Conceptualization, Validation, Investigation, Funding acquisition, Resources, Visualization, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This study is supported by a CMU Proactive Researcher grant of Chiang Mai University (grant number EX010059) and Chiang Mai University, and the APC was funded by the Office of Research Administration, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand. This research was partially supported by Chiang Mai University. Napalai Chaiwan would like to thank the CMU Proactive Researcher, Chiang Mai University [grant number: EX010059] and Kunming Institute of Botany. Ruvishika S. Jayawardena thanks the National Research Council of Thailand (NRCT) grant “Biodiversity, taxonomy, phylogeny and evolution of Colletotrichum in northern Thailand” (grant no. NRCT-TRG010) and the Thailand Science Research and Innovation (TSRI) grant “Biodiversity, taxonomy, phylogeny, and evolution of Colletotrichum on Avocado, Citrus, Durian and Mango” in northern Thailand (grant no. 652A01003).
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Mae Fah Luang University. N.C. is grateful to the Centre of Excellence in Fungal Research, Mae Fah Luang University (Thailand). S.T. thanks the High-Level Talent Recruitment Plan of Yunnan Province (High-End Foreign Experts Programs). Dhanushka Wanasinghe is funded by the Distinguished Scientist Fellowship Program (DSFP), King Saud University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The reviewer WD declared a shared affiliation with the author ISM to the handling editor at the time of review.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcimb.2025.1550824/full#supplementary-material
References
Abdollahzadeh, J., Groenewald, J. Z., Coetzee, M. P. A., Wingfield, M. J., and Crous, P. W. (2020). Evolution of lifestyles in capnodiales. Stud. mycology 95, 381–414. doi: 10.1016/j.simyco.2020.02.004
Abdollahzadeh, J., Javadi, A., Goltapeh, E. M., Zare, R., and Phillips, A. J. L. (2010). Phylogeny and morphology of four new species of Lasiodiplodia from Iran. Persoonia 25, 1–10.
Almaghrebi, E., Akat, F., and Vatansev, H. (2024). Traditional use of Dracaena cinnabari, importance of its resin, bioactivity study of isolated chemical structures. Stud. Natural Products Chem. 83, 431–463. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-443-22214-6.00010-7
Alves, A., Crous, P. W., Correia, A., and Phillips, A. J. L. (2008). Morphological and molecular data reveal cryptic speciation in Lasiodiplodia theobromae. Fungal Diversity 28, 1–13.
Ariyawansa, H. A., Hyde, K. D., Jayasiri, S. C., Buyck, B., Chethana, K. W. T., Dai, D. Q., et al. (2015). Fungal diversity notes 111–252- taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal taxa. Fungal Diversity 75, 27–274. doi: 10.1007/s13225-015-0346-5
Arzanlou, M., Groenewald, J. Z., Gams, W., Braun, U., and Crous, P. W. (2007). Phylogenetic and morphotaxonomic revision of Ramichlo-ridium and allied genera. Stud. Mycology 58, 57–93. doi: 10.3114/sim.2007.58.03
Bakhshi, M., Arzanlou, M., Groenewald, J. Z., Quaedvlieg, W., and Crous, P. W. (2019). Parastagonosporella fallopiae gen. et sp. nov. (Phaeosphaeriaceae) on Fallopia convolvulus from Iran. Mycological Prog. 18, 203–214. doi: 10.1007/s11557-018-1428-z
Barron, G. L. and Busch, L. V. (1962). Studies on the soil hyphomycete Scolecobasidium. Can. J. Bot. 40, 77–84. doi: 10.1139/b62-009
Bensch, K., Braun, U., Groenewald, J. Z., and Crous, P. W. (2012). The genus cladosporium. Stud. Mycology 72, 1–401. doi: 10.3114/sim0003
Bensch, K., Groenewald, J. Z., Dijksterhuis, J., Starink-Willemse, M., Andersen, B., Summerell, B. A., et al. (2010). Species and ecological diversity within the Cladosporium cladosporioides complex (Davidiellaceae, Capnodiales). Stud. Mycology 67, 1–94. doi: 10.3114/sim.2010.67.01
Bhunjun, C. S., Dong, Y., Jayawardena, R. S., Jeewon, R., Phukhamsakda, C., Bundhun, D., et al. (2020). A polyphasic approach to delineate species in Bipolaris. Fungal Diversity 102, 225–256. doi: 10.1007/s13225-020-00446-6
Boedijn, K. B. (1933). Über einige Phragmosporen-Dematien. Bull. Jard Bot. Buitenzorg 13 (1), 120–134.
Braun, U., Crous, P. W., and Nakashima, C. (2014). Cercosporoid fungi (Mycosphaerellaceae) 2. Species on monocots (Acoraceae to Xyridaceae, excluding Poaceae). IMA fungus 5, 203–390. doi: 10.5598/imafungus.2014.05.02.04
Burford, E. P., Kierans, M., and Gadd, G. M. (2003). Geomycology: fungal growth in mineral substrata. The Mycologist 17 (3), 98–107.
Cai, L., Giraud, T., Zhang, N., Begerow, D., Cai, G., and Shivas, R. G. (2011). The evolution of species concepts and species recognition criteria in plant pathogenic fungi. Fungal Divers. 50, 121–133. doi: 10.1007/s13225-011-0127-8
Carbone, I. and Kohn, L. M. (1999). A method for designing primer sets for speciation studies in filamentous ascomycetes. Mycologia 91, 553–556. doi: 10.1080/00275514.1999.12061051
Chaiwan, N., Maharachchikumbura, S. S., Wanasinghe, D. N., Doilom, M., Jayawardena, R., Hyde, K. D., et al (2019). First sexual morph record of Sarcopodium vanillae. Mycotaxon 134, 707–717. doi: 10.5248/134.707
Chaiwan, N., Tibpromma, S., Jayawardena, R. S., Mapook, A., Wanasinghe, D., Mortimer, P., et al. (2021)Colletotrichum dracaenigenum, a new species on Dracaena fragrans. Phytotaxa 491, 143–157. doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.491.2.4
Chen, Y. Y., Dissanayake, A. J., Liu, Z. Y., and Liu, J. K. (2020). Additions to Karst Fungi 4: Botryosphaeria spp. associated with woody hosts in Guizhou province, China including B. guttulata sp. nov. Phytotaxa. 454, 186–202.
Chen, S., Li, G., Liu, F., and Michailides, T. J. (2015). Novel species of Botryosphaeriaceae associated with shoot blight of pistachio. Mycologia. 107, 780–792.
Chethana, C. S., Chowdappa, P., Biju, C. N., Praveena, R., and Sujatha, A. M. (2016). Molecular and phenotypic characterization revealed six Colletotrichum species responsible for anthracnose disease of small cardamom in South India. Eur J Plant Pathol. 146, 465–481.
Chethana, K. W. T., Manawasinghe, I. S., Hurdeal, V. G., Bhunjun, C. S., Appadoo, M. A., Gentekaki, E., et al. (2021). What are fungal speciea and how to delineate them? Fungl Diversity 109, 1–25. doi: 10.1007/s13225-021-00483-9
Crane, J. L. and Miller, A. N. (2016). Studies in genera similar to Torula: Bahusaganda, Bahusandhika, Pseudotorula, and Simmonsiella gen. Nov. IMA Fungus 7, 29–45. doi: 10.5598/imafungus.2016.07.01.03
Crous, P. W., Carris, L. M., Giraldo, A., Groenewald, J. Z., and Hawksworth, D. L. (2015). The genera of fungi-fixing the application of the type species of generic names–G 2: Allantophomopsis, Latorua, Macrodiplodiopsis, Macrohilum, Milospium, Protostegia, Pyricularia, Robillarda, Rotula, Septoriella, Torula, and Wojnowicia. IMA fungus 6, 163–198. doi: 10.5598/imafungus.2015.06.01.11
Crous, P. W., Denman, S., Taylor, J. E., Swart, L., and Palm, M. E. (2004). Cultivation and diseases of proteaceae: leucadendron, leucospermum and protea. CBS Biodiversity Ser. 2, 1–228.
Crous, P. W., Shivas, R. G., Quaedvlieg, W. V., van der Bank, M., Zhang, Y., and Summerell, B. A. (2014). Fungal Planet description sheets: 214–280. Persoonia-Molecular Phylogeny Evol. Fungi 32, 184–306.
Crous, P. W., Wingfield, M. J., Lombard, L., Roets, F., Swart, W. J., Alvarado, P., et al. (2019). Fungal Planet description sheets: 951–1041. Persoonia: Mol. Phylogeny Evol. Fungi 43, 223.
de Silva, N. I., Phillips, A. J., Liu, J. K., Lumyong, S., and Hyde, K. D. (2019). Phylogeny and morphology of Lasiodiplodia species associated with magnolia forest plants. Sci. Rep. 9, 1–11. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-50804-x
Dissanayake, A. J., Phillips, A. J. L., Li, X. H., and Hyde, K. D. (2016). Botryosphaeriaceae: current status of genera and species. Mycosphere. 7, 1001–1073.
Dissanayake, A. J., Purahong, W., Wubet, T., Hyde, K. D., Zhang, W., Xu, H., et al. (2021). Living fungi in an opencast limestone mine: Who are they and what can they do? J. Fungi 8 (10), 987.
Dissanayake, A. J., Bhunjun, C. S., Maharachchikumbura, S. S. N., and Liu, J. K. (2020). Applied aspects of methods to infer phylogenetic relationships amongst fungi. Mycosphere 11, 2652–2676. doi: 10.5943/mycosphere/11/1/18
Dou, Z. P., He, W., and Zhang, Y. (2017). Lasiodiplodia chinensis, a new holomorphic species from China. Mycosphere 8, 521–530. doi: 10.5943/mycosphere/8/2/3
Doilom, M., Dissanayake, A. J., Wanasinghe, D. N., Boonmee, S., Liu, J. K., Bhat, D. J., et al (2016). Microfungi on Tectona grandis (teak) in Northern Thailand. Fungal Diversity. 82, 107–182. doi: 10.1007/s13225-016-0368-7
Dwivedi, R. S. (1959). Occurrence of the genus Scolecobasidium abbott in India. Curr. Sci. 28, 374–375. doi: 10.1128/jcm.02027-14
Ellis, J. J. and Yates, S. G. (1971). Mycotoxins of fungi from fescue. Economic Bot. 25, 1–5. doi: 10.1007/BF02894555
French, A. M. (1989). California Plant Disease Host Index. Calif. Dept. Food Agric., Sacramento., 1–394.
Farr, D. F. and Rossman, A. Y. (2024). Fungal databases, systematic mycology and microbiology laboratory, ARS, USDA. Available at: http://nt.ars-grin.gov/fungaldatabases/.
Farr, D. F. and Rossman, A. Y. (2025). Fungal databases, systematic mycology and microbiology laboratory, ARS, USDA. Available online at: http://nt.ars-grin.gov/fungaldatabases/. (Accessed March 14, 2025).
Felsenstein, J. (1985). Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125, 1–15. doi: 10.1086/284325
Ferdinandez, H. S., Manamgoda, D. S., and Udayanga, D. (2024). First report of Curvularia dactylocteniicola causing leaf spots on Zea mays and Sorghum in Sri Lanka. Ceylon J. Sci. 2024, 53.
Ferdinandez, H. S., Manamgoda, D. S., Udayanga, D., Deshappriya, N., Munasinghe, M. S., and Castlebury, L. A. (2022). Molecular phylogeny and morphology reveal two new graminicolous species, Bipolaris adikaramae sp. nov and B. petchii sp. nov., with new records of fungi from cultivated rice and weedy grass hosts. Mycological Prog. 21, 59.
Flannigan, M. D. and Wotton, B. M. (2001). “Climate, weather, and area burned,” in Forest fires (Academic Press), 351–373.
Ge, Q., Chen, Y., and Xu, T. (2009). Flora Fungorum Sinicorum Vol. 38 (Beijing: Science Press), 235.
Glez-Peña, D., Gómez-Blanco, D., Reboiro-Jato, M., Fdez-Riverola, F., and Posada, D. (2010). ALTER: program–oriented format conversion of DNA and protein alignments. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, 14–18. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq321
Gomdola, D., Jayawardena, R. S., McKenzie, E. H. C., Bulgakov, T. S., Wanasinghe, D. N., Huanraluek, N., et al. (2024). Phyllosticta taxa (Botryosphaeriales, Phyllostictaceae) from northern Thailand and southern European Russia: New host and geographical records. Phytotaxa 637 (3), 211–241.
Gomdola, D., Jeewon, R., Jayawardena, R. S., Pem, D., and Harishchandra, D. L. (2020). A new record of Lasiodiplodia pseudotheobromae causing leaf spot of Cynometra malaccensis in Thailand. Plant Pathol. Quarantine 10, 223–237. doi: 10.5943/PPQ/10/1/21
Hongsanan, S., Hyde, K. D., Phookamsak, R., Wanasinghe, D. N., and McKenzie, E. H. C. (2020). Refined families of dothideomycetes: dothideomycetidae and pleosporomycetidae. Mycosphere 11, 1553–2107. doi: 10.5943/mycosphere/11/1/13
Hoog, G. D., Queiroz-Telles, F., Haase, G., Fernandez-Zeppenfeldt, G., Angelis, D. A., Hg Gerrits Van Den Ende, A., et al. (2000). Black fungi: clinical and pathogenic approaches. Med. Mycology 38, 243–250. doi: 10.1080/mmy.38.s1.243.250
Hou, L. W., Groenewald, J. Z., Pffenning, L. H., Yarden, O., Crous, P. W., and Cai, L. (2020). The phoma-like dilemma. Stud. mycology 96, 309–396. doi: 10.1016/j.simyco.2020.05.001
Hyde, K. D., Cai, L., and Jeewon, R. (2005). Tropical fungi. In The fungal community: its organization and role in the ecosystem. CRC Press. pp. 93–115
Hyde, K. D., de Silva, N. I., Jeewon, R., Bhat, D. J., and Phookamsak, R. (2020). AJOM new records and collections of fungi: 1–100. Asian J. Mycology 3, 22–294. doi: 10.5943/ajom/3/1/3
Hyde, K. D., Noorabadi, M. T., Thiyagaraja, V., He, M. Q., and Johnston, P. R. (2024). The 2024 Outline of Fungi and fungus-like taxa. Mycosphere 15, 5146–6239. doi: 10.5943/mycosphere/15/1/25
Hyde, K. D., Tennakoon, D. S., Jeewon, R., and Bhat, D. J. (2019). Fungal diversity notes 1036–1150: taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions on genera and species of fungal taxa. Fungal Diversity 96, 1–242. doi: 10.1007/s13225-019-00429-2
Index Fungorum (2025). Available online at: http://www.indexfungorum.org/names/Names.asp (Accessed March, 2025).
Jaminson, E. H. (2012). Generating knowledge about the Dracaena marginata pest complex to improve management strategies for crops exported from Costa Rica [dissertation]. Ecological Agriculture School of CATIE, Centro Agronómico Tropical de Investigacióny Enseñanza, West Lafayette (IN), Purdue University.
Jayasiri, S. C., Hyde, K. D., Abd-Elsalam, K. A., and Abdel-Wahab, M. A. (2015). The Facesoffungi database: fungal names linked with morphology, molecular and human attributes. Fungal Diversity 74, 3–18. doi: 10.1007/s13225-015-0351-8
Jayawardena, R. S., Hyde, K. D., Chen, Y. J., and Papp, V. (2020). One stop shop IV: taxonomic update with molecular phylogeny for important phytopathogenic genera: 76–100 (2020). Fungal Diversity 103, 87–218. doi: 10.1007/s13225-020-00460-8
Jayawardena, R. S., Hyde, K. D., de Farias, A. R. G., Bhunjun, C. S., Ferdinandez, H. S., and Manamgoda, D. S. (2021). What is a species in fungal plant pathogens? Fungal Diversity 109, 239–266. doi: 10.1007/s13225-021-00484-8
Jayawardena, R. S., Hyde, K. D., Jeewon, R., Ghobad-Nejhad, M., Wanasinghe, D. N., and Liu, N. (2019). One stop shop II: taxonomic update with molecular phylogeny for important phytopathogenic genera: 26–50 (2019). Fungal Diversity 94, 41–129. doi: 10.1007/s13225-019-00418-5
Jeewon, R. and Hyde, K. D. (2016). Establishing species boundaries and new taxa among fungi: recommendations to resolve taxonomic ambiguities. Mycosphere 7, 1669–1677. doi: 10.5943/mycosphere/7/11/4
Jeon, S. J., Nguyen, T. T. T., and Lee, H. B. (2015). Phylogenetic status of an unrecorded species of Curvularia, C. spicifera, base on current classification system of Curvularia and Bipolaris group using multi loci. Mycobiology 43, 210–217.
Jones, E., Devadatha, B., Monika, C., Abdel-Wahab, M., Dayarathne, M. C., Zhang, S. N., et al. (2019a). Phylogeny of new marine Dothideomycetes and Sordariomycetes from mangroves and deep-sea sediments. Botanica Marina 63, 1–28. doi: 10.1515/bot-2019-0014
Jones, E. B. G., Pang, K. L., Abdel-Wahab, M. A., Hyde, K. D., Boekhout, T., et al. (2019b). An online resource for marine fungi. Fungal Diversity 96, 347–433. doi: 10.1007/s13225-019-00426-5
Kusai, N. A., Azmi, M. M. Z., Zulkifly, S., Yusof, M. T., and Zainudin, N. A. I. M. (2016). Morphological and molecular characterization of Curvularia and related species associated with leaf spot disease of rice in Peninsular Malaysia. Rend. Fis. Acc. Lincei 27, 205–214. doi: 10.1007/s12210-015-0458-6
Li, J. T., Fu, J. F., Yan, X. R., Li, H., and Zhou, R. (2006). Analysis of temporal dynamics of Curvularia leaf spot of maize (Curvularia lunata) epidemic and yield loss. J. Shenyang Agric. Univ. 37, 835.
Li, W. L., Liang, R. R., Dissanayake, A. J., and Liu, J. K. (2023). Mycosphere Notes 413–448: Dothideomycetes associated with woody oil plants in China. Mycosphere 14, 1436–1529. doi: 10.5943/mycosphere/14/1/16
Li, J. F., Phookamsak, R., Jeewon, R., Bhat, D. J., Mapook, A., Camporesi, E., et al. (2017). Molecular taxonomy and morphological characterization reveal new species and new host records of Torula species (Torulaceae, Pleosporales). Mycological Prog. 16, 447–461. doi: 10.1007/s11557-017-1292-2
Lin, C. G., McKenzie, E. H. C., Bhat, D. J., and Ran, S. F. (2016). Stachybotrys-like taxa from karst areas and a checklist of stachy-botrys-like species from Thailand. Mycosphere 7, 1273–1291. doi: 10.5943/mycosphere/7/9/3
Liu, J. K., Phookamsak, R., Doilom, M., Wikee, S., and Li, Y. M. (2012). Towards a natural classification of Botryosphaeriales. Fungal Diversity 57, 149–210. doi: 10.1007/s13225-012-0207-4
Luo, Z. L., Hyde, K. D., Liu, J. K. J., Maharachchikumbura, S. S., Jeewon, R., Bao, D. F., et al. (2019). Freshwater sordariomycetes. Fungal Diversity 99, 451–660. doi: 10.1007/s13225-019-00438-1
Manamgoda, D. S., Cai, L., McKenzie, E. H. C., Crous, P. W., Madrid, H., Chukeatirote, E., et al. (2012). A phylogenetic and taxonomic re-evaluation of the Bipolaris - Cochliobolus - Curvularia Complex. Fungal Diversity 56, 131–144. doi: 10.1007/s13225-012-0189-2
Manamgoda, D. S., Rossman, A. Y., Castlebury, L. A., Crous, P. W., and Madrid, H. (2014). The genus bipolaris. Stud. mycology 2014, 1–68. doi: 10.1016/j.simyco.2014.10.002
Manawasinghe, I. S., Phillips, A. J. L., Hyde, K. D., Chethana, K. W. T., Zhang, W., Zhao, W. S., et al. (2016). Mycosphere essays 14: assessing the aggressiveness of plant pathogenic Botryosphaeriaceae. Mycosphere 7, 883–892. doi: 10.5943/mycosphere/si/1b/7
Marques, M. W., Lima, N. B., Morais, M. A., Jr., Phillips, A. J. L., and Câmara, M. P. S. (2013). Species of Lasiodiplodia associated with mango in Brazil. Fungal Diversity 61, 181–193.
Mehl, J. W. M., Slippers, B., Roux, J., and Wingfield, M. J. (2013). “Cankers and other diseases caused by the Botryosphaeriaceae,” in Infectious forest diseases. Eds. Gonthier, P. and Nicolotti, ,. G. (CAB International, Boston, Minnesota), 298–317.
Miller, M. A., Pfeiffer, W., and Schwartz, T. (2010). “Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees,” in Proceedings of the gateway computing environments workshop (GCE) 14 Nov 2010 (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, New Orleans, LA), 1–8.
Mukherjee, P. K., Horwitz, B. A., Singh, U. S., Mala Mukherjee, M. M., and Schmoll, M. (2013). Trichoderma: biology and applications (CABI).
Nováková, A. (2009). ?Microscopic fungi isolated from the Domica Cave system(Slovak Karst National Park, Slovakia). A review. Int J Speleol. 38, 71–82.
NCBI. (2025). Available online at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/ (Accessed December 17, 2025).
Norimova, G., Umurzakova, Z., and Rasulova, Z. (2024). Analysis of phytopathogenic micromycetes common in fruit trees and shrubs (the city of Samarkand as an example). E3S Web Conferences 577, 02019. doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202457702019
Osorio, J. A., Crous, C. J., De Beer, Z. W., Wingfield, M. J., and Roux, J. (2016). Endophytic Botryosphaeriaceae, including five new species, associated with mangrove trees in South Africa. Fungal Biol. 121, 361–393.
Osorio, J. A., Crous, C. J., De Beer, Z. W., Wingfield, M. J., and Roux, J. (2017). Endophytic Botryosphaeriaceae, including five new species, associated with mangrove trees in South Africa. Fungal Biol. 121, 361–393. doi: 10.1016/j.funbio.2016.09.004
Padhye, A. A., Pathak, A. A., Katkar, V. J., Hazare, V. K., and Kaufman, L. (1994). Oral histoplasmosis in India: a case report and an over-view of cases reported during 1968–92. J. Med. veterinary mycology 32, 93–103. doi: 10.1080/02681219480000141
Page, R. D. M. (1996). TreeView: an application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 12, 357–358. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/12.4.357
Pem, D., Hyde, K. D., McKenzie, E. H. C., and Hongsanan, S. (2024). A comprehensive overview of genera in Dothideomycetes. Mycosphere 15, 2157–4568. doi: 10.5943/mycosphere/15/1/18
Pereira, C. M., Sarmiento, S. S., Colmán, A. A., Belachew‑Bekele, K., Evans, H. C., and Barreto, R. W. (2024). Mycodiversity in a micro‑habitat: twelve Cladosporium species, including four new taxa, isolated from uredinia of coffee leaf rust, Hemileia vastatrix. Fungal System. Evol. 14 (1), 9–33.
Persoon, C. H. (1794). Neuer versuch einer systematischen einteilung der schwämme. Neues Mag. Bot. 1, 63.
Peregrine, W. T. H. and Ahmad, K. B. (1982). Brunei: A first annotated list of plant diseases and associated organisms. Phytopathol. Pap. 27, 1–87.
Phillips, A. J., Hyde, K. D., Alves, A., and Liu, J. K. (2019). Families in Botryosphaeriales: a phylogenetic, morphological and evolutionary perspective. Fungal Diversity 94, 1–22. doi: 10.1007/s13225-018-0416-6
Phookamsak, R., Liu, J. K., McKenzie, E. H. C., and Manamgoda, D. S. (2014). Revision of phaeosphaeriaceae. Fungal Divers. 68, 159–238. doi: 10.1007/s13225-014-0308-3
Phookamsak, R., Wanasinghe, D. N., Hongsanan, S., and Phukhamsakda, C. (2017). Towards a natural classification of Ophiobolus and ophiobolus-like taxa; introducing three novel genera Ophiobolopsis, Paraophiobolus and Pseudoophiobolus in Phaeosphaeriaceae (Pleosporales). Fungal Diversity 87, 299–339. doi: 10.1007/s13225-017-0393-1
Phukhamsakda, C., McKenzie, E. H., Phillips, A. J., Gareth Jones, E. B., Jayarama, B. D., and Stadler, M. (2020). Microfungi associated with Clematis (Ranunculaceae) with an integrated approach to delimiting species boundaries. Fungal Diversity 102, 1–203. doi: 10.1007/s13225-020-00448-4
Piątek, M., Stryjak-Bogacka, M., and Czachura, P. (2024). Arthrocatenales, a new order of extremophilic fungi in the Dothideomycetes. MycoKeys 108, 47–74. doi: 10.3897/mycokeys.108.128033
Pipattanapuckdee, A., Boonyakait, D., Tiyayon, C., and Seehanam, P. (2019). Lasiodiplodia pseudotheobromae causes postharvest fruit rot of longan in Thailand. Australas. Plant Dis. Notes 14, 21. doi: 10.1007/s13314-019-0350-9
POWO (2021). Plants of the World Online (Facilitated by the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew). Available online at: http://www.plantsoftheworldonline.org/ (Accessed May 18, 2025).
Pretorius, M. C., Crous, P. W., and Groenewald, J. Z. (2003). Phylogeny of some cercosporoid fungi from Citrus. Sydowia 55, 286–305.
Quaedvlieg, W., Binder, M., Groenewald, J. Z., and Summerell, B. A. (2014). Introducing the consolidated species concept to resolve species in the Teratosphaeriaceae. Persoonia 33, 1–40. doi: 10.3767/003158514X681981
Salkin, I. F., McGinnis, M. R., Cooper, C. R., Rippon, J. W., and Beneke, E. S. (1994). Current priorities for the clinical mycology laboratory. J. Med. veterinary mycology 32, 309–319. doi: 10.1080/02681219480000931
Samerpitak, K., Duarte, A. P. M., Attili-Angelis, D., Pagnocca, F. C., Heinrichs, G., Rijs, A. J. M. M., et al. (2015). A new species of the oligotrophic genus Ochroconis (Sympoventuriaceae). Mycological Prog. 14, 1–10. doi: 10.1007/s11557-015-1023-5
Sandoval-Denis, M., Gené, J., Sutton, D. A., Wiederhold, N. P., Cano-Lira, J. F., Guarro, J., et al. (2016). New species of Cladosporium associated with human and animal infections. Persoonia 36 2016, 281–298. doi: 10.3767/003158516X691951
Schoch, C. L., Crous, P. W., Groenewald, J. Z., Boehm, E. W. A., and Burgess, T. I. (2009). A class–wide phylogenetic assessment of Dothideomycetes. Stud. Mycology 64, 1–15. doi: 10.3114/sim.2009.64.01
Senanayake, I. C., Rathnayaka, A. R., Marasinghe, D. S., and Calabon, M. S. (2020). Morphological approaches in studying fungi: collection, examination, isolation, sporulation and preservation. Mycosphere 11, 2678–2754. doi: 10.5943/mycosphere/11/1/20
Shen, M., Zhang, J. Q., Zhao, L. L., Groenewald, J. Z., Crous, P. W., and Zhang, Y. (2020). Venturiales. Stud. Mycology 96, 185–308. doi: 10.1016/j.simyco.2020.03.001
Shivas, J. M., Morrison, H. A., Bilder, D., and Skop, A. R. (2010). Polarity and endocytosis: reciprocal regulation. Trends Cell Biol. 20, 445–452. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2010.04.003
Singh, K., Flood, J., Welsh, R. D., Wyckoff, J. H., Snider, T. A., and Sutton, D. A. (2006). Fatal systemic phaeohyphomycosis caused by Ochroconis gallopavum in a dog (Canis familaris). Vet. Pathol. 43, 988–992. doi: 10.1354/vp.43-6-988
Slippers, B. and Wingfield, M. J. (2007). Botryosphaeriaceae as endophytes and latent pathogens of woody plants: diversity, ecology and impact. Fungal Biol. Rev. 21, 90–106. doi: 10.1016/j.fbr.2007.06.002
Slippers, B., Ramabulana, E., and Coetzee, M. P. A. (2024). Botryosphaeriaceae partially overlap on asymptomatic and symptomatic tissues of Anacardiaceae in agroecosystems and conservation areas in northern South Africa. Fungal System. Evol. 13, 131–142.
Stamatakis, A., Hoover, P., and Rougemont, J. (2008). A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML web servers. Systematic Biol. 57, 758–771. doi: 10.1080/10635150802429642
Su, X. J., Luo, Z. L., Jeewon, R., Bhat, D. J., Bao, D. F., and Li, W. L. (2018). Morphology and multigene phylogeny reveal new genus and species of Torulaceae from freshwater habitats in northwestern Yunnan, China. Mycol Prog. 17, 531–545. doi: 10.1007/s11557-018-1388-3
Swofford, D. L. (2003). PAUP* (Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts: Phylogenetic analysis Using Parasimony (*and Other Methods). Version 4.).
Tan, Y. P., Crous, P. W., and Shivas, R. G. (2016). Eight novel Bipolaris species identified from John L. Alcorn’s collections at the Queensland Plant Pathology Herbarium (BRIP). Mycological Prog. 15, 1203–1214. doi: 10.1007/s11557-016-1240-6
Tan, Y. P., Madrid, H., Crous, P. W., and Shivas, R. G. (2014). Johnalcornia gen. et. comb. nov., and nine new combinations in Curvularia based on molecular phylogenetic analysis. Australas. Plant Pathol. 43, 589–603. doi: 10.1007/s13313-014-0315-6
Tennakoon, D. S., Thambugala, K. M., De Silva, N. I., Kuo, C. H., and Hyde, K. D. (2019). Leaf litter saprobic Didymellaceae (Dothideomycetes): Leptosphaerulina longiflori sp., nov. and Didymella sinensis, a new record from Roystonea regia. Asian J. Mycology 2, 87–100. doi: 10.5943/ajom/2/1/3
Thongkantha, S., Lumyong, S., McKenzie, E. H. C., and Hyde, K. D. (2008). Fungal saprobes and pathogens occurring on tissues of Dracaena lourieri and Pandanus spp. in Thailand. Fungal Diversity 30, 149–169.
Torres-Cortés, G., Ghignone, S., Bonfante, P., and Schüßler, A. (2015). Mosaic genome of endobacteria in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: transkingdom gene transfer in an ancient mycoplasma-fungus association. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 112, 7785–7790. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1501540112
Trakunyingcharoen, T., Cheewangkoon, R., To-Anun, C., Crous, P. W., Van Niekerk, J. M., and Lombard, L. (2014). Botryosphaeriaceae associated with diseases of mango (Mangifera indica). Australas. Plant Pathol. 43, 425–438. doi: 10.1007/s13313-014-0284-9
Trovão, J., Tiago, I., Soares, F., Paiva, D. S., Mesquita, N., Coelho, C., et al. (2020). In vitro analyses of fungi and dolomitic limestone interactions: bioreceptivity and biodeterioration assessment. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 155, 105107.
van Kleinwee, I., Larridon, I., Shah, T., Bauters, K., Asselman, P., Goetghebeur, P., et al. (2022). Plastid phylogenomics of the Sansevieria Clade of Dracaena (Asparagaceae) resolves a recent radiation. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 169, 107404. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2022.107404
Videira, S. I. R., Groenewald, J. Z., Nakashima, C., and Braun, U. (2017). Mycosphaerellaceae – chaos or clarity? Stud. Mycology 87, 257–421. doi: 10.1016/j.simyco.2017.09.003
Wanasinghe, D. N., Phukhamsakda, C., Hyde, K. D., Jeewon, R., and Lee, H. B. (2018). Fungal diversity notes 709–839:taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal taxa with an emphasis on fungi on Rosaceae. Fungal Diversity 89, 1–236. doi: 10.1007/s13225-018-0395-7
Wang, Y., Lin, S., Zhao, L., and Sun, X. (2019). Lasiodiplodia spp. associated with Aquilaria crassna in Laos. Mycological Prog. 18, 683–701. doi: 10.1007/s11557-019-01481-7
Waqas, M., Khan, A. L., Kang, S. M., Hamayun, M., and Lee, I. J. (2013). Biological control of Fusarium wilt of tomato by Pseudomonas fluorescens and its potential in plant growth promotion. Biol. Control 67 (3), 301–308.
Wijayawardene, N. N., Hyde, K. D., Dai, D. Q., and Sánchez-García, M. (2022). Outline of Fungi and fungus-like taxa – 2021. Mycosphere 13, 53–453. doi: 10.5943/mycosphere/13/1/2
Woudenberg, J. H. C., Aveskamp, M. M., de Gruyter, J., Spiers, A. G., and Crous, P. W. (2009). Multiple Didymella teleomorphs are linked to the Phoma clematidina morphotype. Persoonia 22, 56–62. doi: 10.3767/003158509X427808
Wu, N., Dissanayake, A. J., Chethana, K. W. T., Hyde, K. D., and Liu, J. K. (2021). Mopho-phylogenetic evidence reveals Lasiodiplodia chiangraiensis sp. nov. (Botryosphaeriaceae) associated with woody hosts in northern Thailand. Phytotaxa 508, 142–154. doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.508.2.3
Yang, E. F., Tibpromma, S., Karunarathna, S. C., Phookamsak, R., and Xu, J. C. (2022). Taxonomy and phylogeny of novel and extant taxa in pleosporales associated with Mangifera indica from Yunnan, China (Series I). J. Fungi 8, 152. doi: 10.3390/jof8020152
Yarita, K., Sano, A., Murata, Y., Takayama, A., Takahashi, Y., Takahashi, H., et al. (2007). Pathogenicity of Ochroconis gallopava isolated from hot springs in Japan and a review of published reports. Mycopathologia 164, 135–147. doi: 10.1007/s11046-007-9034-7
Zalar, P. D., De Hoog, G. S., Schroers, H. J., Crous, P. W., Groenewald, J. Z., and Gunde-Cimerman, N. (2007). Phylogeny and ecology of the ubiquitous saprobe Cladosporium sphaerospermum, with descriptions of seven new species from hypersaline environments. Stud. mycology 58, 157–183. doi: 10.3114/sim.2007.58.06
Zhang, J. F., Liu, J. K., Hyde, K. D., Chen, Y. Y., Ran, H. Y., and Liu, Z. Y. (2023). Ascomycetes from karst landscapes of Guizhou Province, China. Fungal Diversity 122, 1–160.
Keywords: fungal biodiversity, Dothideomycetes, drought tolerance plant, multi-loci phylogenetic analysis, new fungal taxa
Citation: Hyde KD, Chaiwan N, Jayawardena RS, Tibpromma S, Wanasinghe DN, Manawasinghe IS, Manamgoda DS and Promputtha I (2025) Morphology and molecular phylogeny of Dothideomycetes fungi associated with Dracaena plants. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 15:1550824. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1550824
Received: 24 December 2024; Accepted: 20 June 2025;
Published: 11 August 2025.
Edited by:
Sinang Hongsanan, Shenzhen University, ChinaReviewed by:
Wei Dong, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, ChinaSatinee Suetrong, National Biobank of Thailand, Thailand
Yuanpin Xiao, Guizhou Institute of Technology, China
Copyright © 2025 Hyde, Chaiwan, Jayawardena, Tibpromma, Wanasinghe, Manawasinghe, Manamgoda and Promputtha. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Napalai Chaiwan, YmFpbWFpbmFwYWxhaWNoYWl3YW5AZ21haWwuY29t, bmFwYWxhaS5jQGNtdS5hYy50aA==; Itthayakorn Promputtha, cHBhbTExOEBnbWFpbC5jb20=, aXR0aGF5YWtvcm4ucEBjbXUuYWMudGg=
§ORCID: Dimuthu S. Manamgoda, orcid.org/0000-0002-1936-8556