ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.
Sec. Clinical and Diagnostic Microbiology and Immunology
Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1569037
This article is part of the Research TopicA One Health Approach to Infection Prevention and Antimicrobial ResistanceView all 4 articles
Knowledge and practices related to antimicrobial use in fighting cocks -a survey of fighting cock owners in Timor-Leste
Provisionally accepted- 1Animal Health Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Universidade Nacional Timor Lorosae, Dili, Timor-Leste
- 2National Directorate of Veterinary, Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock, Forestry, and Fisheries, Dili, Timor-Leste
- 3The Asia Pacific Centre for Animal Health, Melbourne Veterinary School, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- 4Escuela de Medicina Veterinaria, Facultad de Ciencias de la Vida, Universidad Andres Bello, Concepcion, Biobio, Chile
- 5Global and Tropical Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Australia
- 6School of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Camden, New South Wales, Australia
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Cock fighting is an industry with a long standing in Southeast Asia and the birds have a high value. However, there is scant published literature on antimicrobial use and knowledge about antimicrobial resistance (AMR) among fighting cock owners in Timor-Leste. This cross-sectional survey was conducted of randomly selected owners of fighting cocks in urban areas in Timor-Leste between February to and March 2023 to assess their knowledge about antimicrobials and AMR, and their use of antimicrobials in fighting cocks. Data collection was done using a structured questionnaire administered by face-to-face interviews. A total of 275 participants were interviewed. Knowledge about antimicrobials and AMR among fighting cock owners in Timor-Leste was poor. Owners in urban areas (aOR = 2.4, 95% CI [1.4-4.1], p-value = 0.002) and those with higher education (aOR = 2.3, 95% CI [1.3-4.2], p-value = 0.007) were more knowledgeable Their knowledge about antimicrobials was found to be strongly associated with municipality (pvalue ≤ .001) and level of education (p-value ≤ .001). The majority used antimicrobials (76.2%, 205/269) in their cocks and the most common antimicrobials used were amoxicillin (77.5%, 159/205) and ampicillin (54.2%, 111/205). The most common reasons for use were for treating fight wounds (85.4%, 175/205), respiratory signs (26.3%, 54/205), and diarrhoea (21.0%, 43/205). This study has revealed widespread antimicrobial use by fighting cock owners with low awareness about AMR, which creates a high-risk environment for selection for emergence of AMR. There is a need for a comprehensive intervention that combines regulatory controls, enhanced surveillance, targetedand a targeted campaign to mitigate public health risks in Timor-Leste.
Keywords: Fighting cock, antibiotics, antimicrobial resistance, knowledge, Practices, Timor-Leste Font: Italic Formatted: Font: Italic Formatted: Font: Italic Formatted: Font: Italic
Received: 04 Mar 2025; Accepted: 04 Sep 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Pereira, Amaral, Coppo, Bailey, Ting, Gilkerson, Browning, Jong and Toribio. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Abrao J. Pereira, Animal Health Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Universidade Nacional Timor Lorosae, Dili, Timor-Leste
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.