ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.
Sec. Clinical and Diagnostic Microbiology and Immunology
Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1579049
This article is part of the Research TopicPathogenic Mechanisms and New Technology-Based Diagnostics for Bacterial InfectionsView all 10 articles
Detection of Ureaplasma parvum in Amniotic Fluids Via Reanalysis of Prenatal Copy Number Variation Sequencing Data: An Exploratory Study
Provisionally accepted- 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- 2Department of bioinformatics, Guangzhou Forevergen Medical Laboratory Co., Ltd,, Guangzhou, China
- 3Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Detecting microbes in amniotic fluids via amniocentesis represents the standard method for diagnosing intrauterine infections. Given its similarity to metagenomic next-generation sequencing, copy number variation sequencing (CNVseq) data may also contain microbial sequences. This exploratory study aimed to investigate the feasibility of prenatal CNV-seq for detecting Ureaplasma parvum (U. parvum) in amniotic fluids and to evaluate the pregnancy outcomes in U. parvumpositive cases. Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 2419 singleton pregnant women who underwent genetic amniocentesis for fetal CNV-seq testing and completed the follow-up with documented pregnancy outcomes. The CNV-seq data were reanalyzed to extract the read counts of U. parvum from each sample's raw data, and reads per million (RPM) was used to quantify its relative abundance. Results: The prevalence of asymptomatic intrauterine U. parvum positivity in this cohort was 1.4% (33/2419), with read counts ranging 1 to 30423 and RPM from 0.09 to 3580.65 by reanalysis of CNV-seq data. There was a statistically significantly higher risk for early spontaneous preterm labor (<32 gestational weeks; P<0.001) and preterm premature rupture of the membranes (P<0.001) in women with positive U. parvum compared to negative cases. Among U. parvum positive cases, six cases (6/33, 18.2%) had relatively higher read counts ranging from 2483 to 30423, with corresponding RPM of 406.45 to 3580.65. Adverse pregnancy outcomes were exclusively observed among women with high reads of U. parvum as opposed to those with low reads. Four cases with high U. parvum reads in amniotic fluids, not treated with antibiotics, showed a latency period of 6 to 10 weeks from positive detection to the onset of clinical manifestations.Conclusions: CNV-seq may be a feasible method for detecting intraamniotic U. parvum infection. High abundance of asymptomatic U. parvum in amniotic fluids are statistically associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes, highlighting its importance in preliminary screening.
Keywords: Intrauterine Infection, Ureaplasma parvum, copy number variation sequencing, Amniocentesis, pregnancy outcomes
Received: 18 Feb 2025; Accepted: 25 Jul 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Wang, Chen, Chen, Hou, Zhang and Han. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Jun Zhang, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
Zhenyan Han, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.