ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.

Sec. Clinical Microbiology

Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1605795

This article is part of the Research TopicDevelopment of point-of-care sensors for diagnosis of bacterial-associated infectionsView all 7 articles

ddPCR Enhances Early Diagnosis, Treatment, Prognosis, and Pathogen Verification in Elderly BSI

Provisionally accepted
Jiayi  PengJiayi PengHuili  BaiHuili BaiYing  LiYing LiHuating  LuoHuating LuoJiajun  LiJiajun LiHaifeng  DaiHaifeng DaiHongmei  WangHongmei WangTao  MengTao MengJia  ZhangJia ZhangZhijian  WangZhijian WangXuanxin  ChenXuanxin ChenWei  CHENGWei CHENGYan  PengYan Peng*Wenxiang  HuangWenxiang Huang*
  • First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background Bloodstream infection (BSI) exhibits elevated mortality, particularly among elderly patients manifesting atypical symptoms. Although blood culture (BC) remains the diagnostic gold standard, its limited sensitivity and prolonged turnaround time impede early detection. Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR), a novel pathogen detection method with superior sensitivity and rapid results, demonstrates significant diagnostic and prognostic for BSI. However, heightened sensitivity may increase false positive rates, with elderly patients particularly susceptible to specimen contamination and transient bacteremia.Methods This retrospective study employed clinical judgment as the diagnostic reference. Patients were stratified into BSI and non-BSI groups, with data collected on ddPCR and BC results, imaging and laboratory findings, medication response, and discharge outcomes. The diagnostic accuracy and antibiotic guidance efficacy of ddPCR and BC were compared, and the clinical utility of ddPCR was evaluated for prognostic assessment and false positive identification.The analysis encompassed 355 episodes from 280 elderly patients with suspected BSI. ddPCR demonstrated significantly higher detection rates compared to BC in BSI group (59.33% versus 20.57%). Combined implementation increased detection to 65.07%. Regardless of clinical judgment (59.61% versus 20.57%) or alternative microbiological tests (90.63% versus 7.14%) served as the reference standards, ddPCR exhibited superior sensitivity to BC. No significant differences emerged in antibiotic adjustment rates or therapeutic efficacy between ddPCR and BC.Elevated microbial species diversity correlated with unfavorable discharge outcomes (P<0.001, OR=2.122). Multiple follow-up ddPCR monitoring revealed progressive increases in the number of species and the copies of some (or all) species among patients with poor outcomes, contrasting with decreasing trends in those with favorable outcomes. When detecting Streptococcus, coagulase-negative Staphylococci (CoNS), Acinetobacter baumannii complex, and Candida, diagnostic thresholds of 132.55, 182.70/262.24, and 174.78 copies/mL, respectively, were established to help differentiate false-positive results.The combination of ddPCR with BC improves BSI diagnosis in elderly patients and facilitates antibiotic treatment optimization. Moreover, ddPCR demonstrates potential for prognostic evaluation and false-positive discrimination. Nevertheless, these findings require further validation through large-scale prospective studies employing predefined clinical criteria.

Keywords: Bsi, diagnosis, prognosis, ddPCR, Elderly, False positive

Received: 04 Apr 2025; Accepted: 23 Jun 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Peng, Bai, Li, Luo, Li, Dai, Wang, Meng, Zhang, Wang, Chen, CHENG, Peng and Huang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Yan Peng, First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
Wenxiang Huang, First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.