Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.

Sec. Clinical Infectious Diseases

Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1606283

This article is part of the Research TopicArtificial Intelligence and mNGS in Pathogenic Microorganism Research.View all 5 articles

Comparison of Microbial Culture, Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing and Droplet Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction Methods for Pathogen Detection in Patients with Neurosurgical Central Nervous System Infection

Provisionally accepted
Hai  YuHai Yu1Dong  LiangDong Liang1Xiangqian  DingXiangqian Ding1Han  GaoHan Gao1Guoyuan  FangGuoyuan Fang1Yan  SongYan Song1Shoujia  SunShoujia Sun1Qibing  HuangQibing Huang1Shili  LiuShili Liu2Zeli  ZhangZeli Zhang1*
  • 1Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China
  • 2School of Basic Medical Sciences, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong Province, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Neurosurgical central nervous system infections (NCNSIs) are one of the most common complications in neurosurgical patients, followed by neurosurgery itself, trauma, implants or infection need to be treated by surgery. However, the diagnosis of NCNSIs continues to pose a significant challenge. The primary objective of this study was to comprehensively assess the diagnostic performance of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) and Multiplex Droplet Digital PCR (ddPCR) in elucidating the microbiological etiologies underlying NCNSIs in affected patients.Data on 127 enrolled NCNSIs patients were collected from Emergency Neurosurgical Intensive Care Unit at Qilu Hospital of Shandong University from June 2022 to October 2024. The clinical record, cerebrospinal fluid or pus routine, biochemical tests, microbial smear and culture, mNGS and ddPCR results, time to positive culture(TTPC), time from sample harvesting to final positive results (THTR) obtained by the physician, turn-around time for mNGS and ddPCR, and follow-up data were collected and analyzed.A total of 127 patients were enrolled in this study. In comparison to the positive rate achieved by traditional culture method (59.1%) in diagnosing NCNSIs , the overall pathogen detection rates of mNGS and ddPCR were markedly elevated (86.6%, p<0.01 and 78.7%, p<0.01, respectively).Notably, the administration of empiric antibiotics did not significantly influence the positive detection rates of either mNGS or ddPCR. When stratified by infection type, mNGS and ddPCR demonstrated notably higher positive detection rates in three specific categories of NCNSIs-ventriculitis, intracranial abscess, and implant-associated infections-compared to meningitis. Among the 127 patients, 37 (29.1%) tested positive via mNGS but negative via microbial culture, whereas 11 patients were positive via mNGS but negative via ddPCR. The mean TTPC for microbial culture was 15.1±10.4 hours. Furthermore, the mean THTR for microbial

Keywords: mNGS (metagenomic next-generation sequencing), ddPCR = droplet digital PCR, neurosurgical central nervous system infections, Microbial culture, Meningitis, Ventriculitis, Intracranial abscess, Implant-associated infections

Received: 05 Apr 2025; Accepted: 14 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Yu, Liang, Ding, Gao, Fang, Song, Sun, Huang, Liu and Zhang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Zeli Zhang, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.