ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.
Sec. Parasite and Host
Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1621051
Diversity, expression, and structural modeling of sugar transporters in Anisakis simplex s. s. L3 and L4 larvae: an in vitro and in silico study
Provisionally accepted- University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Olsztyn, Poland
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Introduction: Glucose transporter (GLUT) research in parasitic nematodes focuses on identifying and characterizing developmentally regulated isoforms, elucidating their regulatory and structural properties, and evaluating their potential as drug targets. While glucose transport mechanisms have been well characterized in the free-living nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, data on parasitic species remain limited. Anisakis simplex s. s., a parasitic nematode, relies on host-derived glucose to maintain energy metabolism. It is hypothesized that A. simplex s. s. utilizes specific glucose transporters to facilitate sugar uptake under varying nutritional conditions.In silico analysis identified five putative facilitated glucose transporter genes (fgt-1, fgt-2, fgt-3, fgt-5, fgt-9) and one Sugars Will Eventually be Exported Transporter (sweet-1) gene. The FGTs were classified as members of the solute carrier family 2 (SLC2), while sweet-1 belonged to the SWEET transporter family. Full-length cDNA sequences were obtained, and encoded proteins structurally characterized using bioinformatic modeling. Expression of transporter genes was assessed in A. simplex s. s. larvae at stages L3 and L4 cultured in vitro under different glucose concentrations and time points. Results: Structural and phylogenetic analyses revealed that fgt-1 and fgt-3 share high similarity with class I GLUTs found in nematodes and vertebrates. Gene expression profiling demonstrated differential regulation between larval stages. Most notably, FGT genes were stably expressed in L4 larvae, whereas in L3 larvae, gene activation was more variable and dependent on glucose concentration, showing a dynamic transcriptional response to nutrient levels. Sweet-1 was expressed in both stages, but its regulation differed over time and with glucose availability. Glucose supplementation altered trehalose and glycogen levels, and trehalase activity varied across stages and treatments, indicating stage-specific metabolic adaptation.The observed transcriptional and biochemical differences between L3 and L4 larvae suggest a shift in glucose uptake mechanisms, from transcuticular absorption in L3 to intestinal glucose uptake in L4 following intestine activation. FGT1 and FGT3 are proposed as key facilitators of glucose uptake, with roles varying across developmental stages. These findings indicate that glucose transporters are regulated in response to changing environmental conditions and may represent targets for rational anthelmintic drug design.
Keywords: Anisakis, GLUT transporters, facilitated glucose transporters, Glucose, Gene Expression
Received: 05 May 2025; Accepted: 04 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Polak, Stryiński, Paukszto, Jastrzebski, Bogacka and Łopieńska-Biernat. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Iwona Polak, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Olsztyn, Poland
Elżbieta Łopieńska-Biernat, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Olsztyn, Poland
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.