Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.

Sec. Intestinal Microbiome

Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1633783

This article is part of the Research TopicMicrobiota, Antibiotic Resistance, and Host-Microbe Interactions: A Comprehensive Exploration of Infectious Disease DynamicsView all articles

Dysbiosis of Gut and Urinary Microbiota in Urolithiasis Patients and Post-Surgical Cases

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Department of Laboratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
  • 2Department of Clinical Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, China
  • 3Department of Laboratory Medicine, Zhengzhou Central Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Research on the microbial roles in urolithiasis primarily focuses on the intestinal microbiota. This study analyzed urine and fecal samples from three cohorts: healthy controls (Control), patients with urinary stones (US), and postoperative patients (PS). We conducted 16S rRNA sequencing analysis to evaluate the variations in microbial communities among these groups during urinary stone production and therapy processes.Results: In fecal microbiota, alpha diversity was lower in the stone group versus the control group, with the postoperative group showing the lowest diversity. The β diversity analysis revealed some differences in the microbial community structure of individuals with different health conditions. LEfSe and Wilcoxon analyses were utilized to discover species that exhibited significant differences between groups. Enterobacteriaceae and Bacteroides are more abundant in patients with stones. The increased abundance of Lactobacillus, Lachnospiraceae, Rumenococcaceae, Faecalibacterium, and Prevotella is associated with a reduced risk of kidney stones.Conclusions: Alterations in urinary and intestinal microbiota may indicate urolithiasis status and treatment response. Future studies should explore microbiota modulation (e.g., probiotics) as an adjunctive strategy, while antibiotic stewardship is warranted to minimize microbiota disruption.

Keywords: intestinal microbiota, urethral microbiota, Urolithiasis, Kidney Stones, stones

Received: 23 May 2025; Accepted: 28 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Jia, Han, Ge, Qiao, Chen, Li, Liu, Fang, Shen, Qi, Wang and Guo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Xiaobing Guo, Department of Laboratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.