Abstract
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has a global prevalence of 20%-33%, and has become the main cause of chronic liver disease. Apart from lifestyle modification therapy, there is currently no definitive pharmacological treatment, thus there is an urgent need to find effective intervention strategies to treat NAFLD. With the discovery of the important role of gut microbes in the pathogenesis of NAFLD, research on the prevention and treatment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease by probiotics is increasing. At present, many studies have confirmed the role of probiotic regulation in the treatment of NAFLD, which can reduce the level of transaminase and liver fibrosis in patients and protect the liver. The clinical application of probiotics includes single species such as Lactobacillus and Bifidobacteria, as well as synbiotics with different compositions. This article reviews the therapeutic effects of probiotics on NAFLD and the mechanisms by which probiotics directly or indirectly affect the disease. Further research is needed to fully understand the specific underlying mechanisms between probiotics, gut microbes, and NAFLD, and more large-scale clinical trials are needed to evaluate probiotics for the treatment of NAFLD.
1 Introduction
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) refers to liver disease in which more than 5% of liver cells are infiltrated with liver fat on liver biopsy specimens and with no regard to excessive alcohol consumption or other clear liver injury factors (Roychowdhury et al., 2018). NAFLD can be divided into nonalcoholic simple fatty liver (NAFL) and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). It is worth mentioning that since most NAFLD patients have one or more cardiometabolic risk factors, the existing name of NAFLD focuses on excluding excessive drinking as the cause. Thus, some international experts have reached a consensus and proposed using the new term metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD), which refers to steatosis brought on by an unbalanced metabolic environment, along with potentially serious steatohepatitis lesions and accompanying fibrosis, to replace NAFLD (). NAFLD and MAFLD overlap significantly, and the two classifications generally have strong concordance, as indicated by a Cohen kappa value of up to 0.92. However, current research related to MAFLD are very limited (). Currently, the global prevalence of NAFLD is increasing, with the incidence rate ranging from 30% to 32.4% (Riazi et al., 2022; ; Younossi et al., 2023). Without timely treatment, NAFLD can progress to cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, and even death (Friedman et al., 2018). However, there is no definite drug therapy for steatosis except lifestyle interventions. Therefore, it is urgent need to find effective treatment methods to alleviate NAFLD.
2 Application of probiotic therapy in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
2.1 NAFLD and probiotic therapy
Recent studies have shown that regulation of gut microbiota can be a feasible strategy for preventing and treating NAFLD. Probiotics are live microorganisms that, when administered in adequate amounts, confer a health benefit on the host. Studies have found that probiotic therapy is an important means of regulating gut microbiota (O'flaherty and Klaenhammer, 2010). At present, many studies (Gao et al., 2016; Loman et al., 2018; Tang et al., 2019; Xiao et al., 2019; Pan et al., 2020; Yang et al., 2021; Huang et al., 2022) have confirmed the role of probiotics regulation in NAFLD treatment through meta-analysis, which can reduce the level of transaminase and liver fibrosis in patients and protect the liver (Khan et al., 2019; Sabirin et al., 2022). Therefore, the first part of the review focuses on the application of probiotic therapy in NAFLD, aiming to provide more and better ideas for the prevention and treatment of NAFLD. This review will provide an updated synthesis of the mechanisms of probiotic therapy in NAFLD and its therapeutic potential, with a focus on novel insights and future research directions.
2.2 The role of probiotics in NAFLD
2.2.1 Single probiotic
The protective and preventive function of Lactobacillus in NAFLD has been fully studied. Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG has been confirmed to share intestinal fatty acids and prevent the development of diet-induced hepatic steatosis, thus effectively treating NAFLD (Jang et al., 2019). Ritze et al (Ritze et al., 2014). also showed that Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG can prevent NAFLD in mice. Mu et al (Mu et al., 2020). showed that Lactobacillus fermentum CQPC06 can colonize in the intestinal tract and alter gut microbiota in NAFLD mice. Lactobacillus paracasei CNCM I-4034 and Lactobacillus rhamnosus CNCM I-4036 can relieve the liver injury by reducing gene expression of pro-inflammatory macrophage cell and leukocyte infiltration of the liver in NAFLD rats (Fontana et al., 2021). Through the in vitro model, Lactobacillus plantarum AR113 and Lactobacillus casei pWQH01 relieved steatosis in a manner dependent on bile salt hydrolase (Huang et al., 2020). Similarly, Lactobacillus sakei MJM60958 can significantly inhibit lipid accumulation in HepG2 cells stimulated by oleic acid and cholesterol, reduce weight of both body and liver in NAFLD mice and control the level of NAFLD-related markers as well, indicating that Lactobacillus sakei MJM60958 can also effectively prevent and treat NAFLD (Nguyen et al., 2022b). Lactobacillus acidophilus SNZ 86 which can enrich selenium has also been confirmed to relieve hepatic steatosis by up-regulating the adenosine 5’-monophosphate (AMP)-activated protein kinase (AMPK) and silent information regulator 1 (SIRT-1) pathways (Pant et al., 2022). Lactobacillus paracasei Jlus66, isolated from natural fermented milk, also has great potential in preventing NAFLD (Ye et al., 2017), which was consistent with that of Wang et al (Wang et al., 2019). In addition, Geng et al (Geng et al., 2022). identified a new type of probiotic Lactobacillus kefiranofaciens ZW3 through zebrafish model and explored the its effect on lipid deposition. They proved that Lactobacillus kefiranofaciens ZW3 has a specific protective effect on NAFLD. Interestingly, engineering Lactobacillus reuteri, made by Oh et al., exerted the further therapeutic effect in NAFLD through recombinant Interleukin-22 (IL-22) delivery (Oh et al., 2020). Liu et al (Liu et al., 2022). made lactoferrin expressed by recombinant lactic acid bacteria, which was more effective in relieving steatosis.
Bifidobacteria also play an important role in the protection and prevention of NAFLD disease. Yan et al (Yan et al., 2020). evaluated the effect of Bifidobacterium lactis V9 on hepatic steatosis in NAFLD rats induced by high-fat diet. They found that Bifidobacterium lactis V9 could inhibit inflammation and relieve NAFLD. Do et al (). also found Bifidobacterium animalis ssp. lactis MG741 could reduce weight and relieve NAFLD by relieving intestinal permeability and inflammatory cytokines. Oral Bifidobacterium longum supplements can prevent obesity and NAFLD by regulating the mRNA expression of renin-angiotensin system components (MaChado et al., 2021). Bifidobacterium longum and Lactobacillus acidophilus can reduce liver fat accumulation, with the former being more effective (Xu et al., 2011).
Moreover, the therapeutic potential of other strains in NAFLD disease can’t be ignored. Faecalibacterium prausnitzii LC49 and LB8 were able to produce short-chain fatty acid and regulate the gut microbiota, indicating their potential role in NAFLD (Hu et al., 2022). MIYAIRI 588, as a probiotic that can enhance butyrate production, has been discovered to slow down the progression of NAFLD (). Seo et al (Seo et al., 2013). also showed that MIYAIRI 588 had new potential to relieve NAFLD. In addition, Limosilactobacillus fermentum MG4295 has been proved to relieve hyperglycemia, a complication of NAFLD (Kim et al., 2022). (Table 1).
Table 1
| Author | Category | Probiotics | Functions | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jang et al. Ritze et al. | Lactobacillus | Lactobacillus rhamnnosus GG | Share intestinal fatty acids and prevent the hepatic steatosis | (Ritze et al., 2014; Jang et al., 2019) |
| Mu et al. | Lactobacillus | Lactobacillus femenhim COPC06 | Colonize in the intestinal tract and alter gut microbiota | (Mu et al., 2020) |
| Fontana et al. | Lactobacillus | Lactobacillus paracasei CNCM1-4034, Lactobacillus rhamnosus CNCM I-4036 | Reduce gene expression of pro-inflammatory macrophage cell and leukocyte infiltration and relieve the liver injury | (Fontana et al., 2021) |
| Huang et al. | Lactobacillus | Lactobacillus plantarum AR113, Lactobacillus casei pWOH01 | Relieve steatosis in a manner dependent on bile salt hydrolase | (Huang et al., 2020) |
| Nguyen et al. | Lactobacillus | Lactobacillus sakei MIM60958 | Inhibit lipid accumulation in HepG2 cells | (Nguyen et al., 2022b) |
| Pant et al. | Lactobacillus | Lactobacillus acidophilus SNZ 86 | Upregulate the AMPK and SIRT-I pathways | (Pant et al., 2022) |
| Ye et al. Wang et al. | Lactobacillus | Lactobacillus paracasei Jhs66 | Have great potential in preventing NAFLD | (Ye et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2019) |
| Geng et al. Liu et al. | Lactobacillus | Lactobacillus kefiranofaciens ZW3, Lacticacid bacteria | Effectively relieve steatosis | (Geng et al., 2022; Liu et al., 2022) |
| Oh et al. | Lactobacillus | Engincering Lactobacillus reuteri | Treat NAFLD further through recombinant Interleukin-22 (IL-22) delivery | (Oh et al., 2020) |
| Yan et al. | Bifidobacteria | Bifidobacterium lactis V9 | Inhibit inflammation and relieve NAFLD | (Yan et al., 2020) |
| Do et al. | Bifidobacteria | Bifidobacterium animalis ssp. lactis MG741 | Relieve intestinal permeability and inflammatory cytokines | () |
| Machado et al. | Bifidobacteria | Oral Bifidobacterium longum supplements | Regulate the mRNA expression of renin-angiotensin system components | (MaChado et al., 2021) |
| Xu et al. | Bifidobacteria | Bifidobacterium longum and Lactobacillus acidophilus | Reduce liver fat accumulation | (Xu et al., 2011) |
| Hu et al. | Other strains | Faecalibacterium prausnitzii LC49 and LB8 | Produce short-chain fatty acid and regulate the gut microbiota | (Hu et al., 2022) |
| Endo et al Seo et al. | Other strains | MIYAIRI 588 | Slow down the progression of NAFLD | (; Seo et al., 2013) |
| Kim et al. | Other strains | Limosilactobacillus fermentum MG4295 | Relieve hyperglycemia | (Kim et al., 2022) |
Single probiotic.
2.2.2 The combination of multi-strain probiotics
The use of single probiotics may not be satisfactory for the treatment of NAFLD. Therefore, many basic studies have focused on the research of the role of the combination of two or more probiotics. Yu et al (Yu et al., 2021). found that Lactobacillus lactis and Pediococcus pentosaceus could significantly postpone the progress of NAFLD through the intestinal-liver axis, especially through the tryptophan metabolic pathway. In the rat NAFLD model, Azarang et al (). showed that the utilization of single probiotics such as Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus reuteri and Bacillus coagulans could reduce oxidative stress markers and the combination of those four probiotics could significantly relieve more symptoms of NAFLD. Regular use of compound probiotics “Symbiter” has also been confirmed to prevent monosodium glutamate-induced NAFLD in mice (Savcheniuk et al., 2014). Furthermore, a probiotic blend containing five different Bacillus genera has been shown to effectively reverse high-fat diet-induced hepatic steatosis, highlighting the potential of Bacillus in treating NAFLD (Kim et al., 2018). Mutaflor® probiotics have also been shown to slow the progress of NAFLD by regulating HSC signaling (Hany et al., 2022).
Clinical trials investigating the role of combined probiotics in NAFLD have been successfully conducted, further enhancing the potential of probiotic combinations for clinical treatment of NAFLD. Tablets containing Lactobacillus bulgaricus and Streptococcus thermophilus was reported to be able to improve the level of liver transaminase in patients with NAFLD, thus having a better therapeutic effect on NAFLD (). In a study conducted by Kobyliak et al (Kobyliak et al., 2018c), 58 patients with type 2 diabetes and NAFLD were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive either the polyprobiotic “Symbiter” or a placebo. The researchers discovered a significant reduction in the fatty liver index, accompanied by decreased serum levels of aspartate aminotransferase (AST), γ-glutamyl transpeptadase (GGT), tumor necrosis fator (TNF), and interleukin-6 (IL-6) in the probiotic group. These observations indicated the potential of “Symbiter” probiotics as a treatment for NAFLD.
Ahn et al (). treated obese NAFLD patients with a mixture of probiotics including six bacteria. They found that probiotic treatment for 12 weeks significantly reduced intrahepatic fat and body weight in NAFLD patients. Probiotic capsules composed of Bifidobacterium longum and Lactobacillus acidophilus have been confirmed to significantly reduce body weight, body mass index, waist and hip circumference and TNF-α levels in patients with NAFLD, and increase the level of serum total antioxidant capacity (Javadi et al., 2018). Similarly, Lactocare, a probiotic capsule containing seven beneficial strains, significantly reduced blood glucose and inflammatory markers in patients with NAFLD (Sepideh et al., 2016). Multi-strain probiotics (MCP® BCMC® strains) containing six different lactic acid bacteria and bifidobacteria complement the treatment of NAFLD can stabilize mucosal immune function and protect NAFLD patients with increased intestinal permeability (Mohamad Nor et al., 2021). VSL#3, a probiotic blend containing eight cultured bacteria, has been utilized in the treatment of NAFLD in rats via its therapeutic effects involve the mitigation of oxidative stress and alleviation of inflammatory liver injury (). Derosa et al (). recruited 60 white adult suffering from NAFLD who were randomly assigned to receive VSL#3 or placebo. The results showed that VSL#3 probiotic therapy could significantly improve liver parameters and ultrasonic grading, and there was no difference between men and women. Loguercio et al (Loguercio et al., 2005). also found that probiotic VSL#3 can significantly improve liver injury caused by NAFLD through clinical cohort study. The capsule formed by probiotic combination has also been fully explored in pediatric NAFLD. Compared with children who received placebo, the level of liver function of children who received probiotic capsules exhibited remarkable enhancement (Famouri et al., 2017) (Table 2).
Table 2
| Authors | The combination of Probiotics | Functions | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yu et al. | Lactobacillus lactis, Pediococcus pentosaceus | Significantly postpone the progress of NAFLD through the intestinal-liver axis | (Yu et al., 2021) |
| Azarang et al. | Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus reuteri, Bacillus coagulans | Significantly relieve more symptoms of NAFID | () |
| Savcheniuk et al. Kobyliak et al. | “Symbiter” (containing 14 probiotics) | Decrease serum levels of AST, GGT, TNF and IL-6 and prevent monosodium glutamate-induced NAFLD | (Savcheniuk et al., 2014; Kobyliak et al., 2018c) |
| Kim et al. | A probiotic blend containing five different Bacillus genera | Effectively reverse high-fat diet-induced hepatic steatosis | (Kim et al., 2018) |
| Hany et al. | Mutaflor® probiotics | Slow the progress of NAFLD by regulating HSC signaling | (Hany et al., 2022) |
| Aller et al. | Lactobacillus bulgaricus, Streptococcus thermophilus | Improve the level of liver transaminase in patients with NAFLD | () |
| Ahn et al. | Lactobacillus acidophilus, L.rhamnosus, L.paracasei Pediococcus pentosaceus, Bifdobacterium lactis, B. breve | Reduce intrahepatic fat and bodyweight in NAFLD patients | () |
| Javadi et al. | Bifidobacterium longum, Lactobacillus acidophilus | Reduce body weight, body mass index, waist and hip circumference and TNF-α levels and increase the level of serum total antioxidant capacity | (Javadi et al., 2018) |
| Sepideh et al. | Lactocare (containing seven beneficial strains) | Reduce blood glucose and inflammatory markers in patients with NAFLD | (Sepideh et al., 2016) |
| Mohamad et al. | MCP® BCMC® strains (containing six different lactic acid bacteria and Bifidobacteria) | Stabilize mucosal immune function and protect NAFLD patients with increased intestinal permeability | (Mohamad Nor et al., 2021) |
| Esposito et al. Derosa et al. Loguercio et al. | VSL#3 (a probiotic blend containing eight cultured bacteria) | Mitigate oxidative stress and alleviate inflammatory liver injury, improve liver parameters and ultrasonic grading, effectively relieve liver injury | (Loguercio et al., 2005; ; ) |
The combination of probiotics.
2.2.3 Incorporation of probiotics with other biological components
Since individual probiotic and combination of probiotics display have shown promising therapeutic potential, the incorporation of probiotics with other biological components has also attracted wide attention. Ahmed et al (). showed that the combination of Lactobacillus reuteri and metronidazole could effectively regulate intestinal flora of NASH mice, resulting in improved therapeutic outcomes. Wang et al (Wang W. et al., 2020). found that the combination of probiotics Bifidobacterium bifidum V, Lactobacillus plantarum X and Salvia miltiorrhiza polysaccharide effectively alleviates hepatic steatosis by modulating gut microbiota and relieving insulin resistance in high-fat diet induced NAFLD mice. Importantly, the combined treatment showed potential benefits surpassing those of probiotics Bifidobacterium bifidum V and Lactobacillus plantarum X alone, indicating that Salvia miltiorrhiza polysaccharide can enhance the function of these probiotics. As the substrate of prebiotics, when combined with Bifidobacteria, it has the potential to improve the efficacy of NAFLD treatment. It is confirmed that the combination of Resveratrol and Bifidobacteria may be a potential drug for the treatment of NAFLD (Hu et al., 2021). In addition, in the NAFLD rat model, “Symbiter” combined with Omega-3 therapy could significantly relieve liver steatosis and liver conversion lipid accumulation compared with probiotics alone (Kobyliak et al., 2017). Furthermore, Kobyliak et al (Kobyliak et al., 2018a). incorporated 48 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus complicated with NAFLD and randomly assigned them to multi-strain “Symbiter” combined with Omega-3 (“Symbiter Omega” combination) and placebo respectively. They found that “Symbiter Omega” combination could reduce liver fat, improve blood lipids and metabolic characteristics, and reduce chronic systemic inflammation in NAFLD patients. Smectite is a natural silicate that binds to digestive mucus and has the ability to bind endotoxin and exotoxin. Studies have found that the combination of multi-probiotics “Symbiter” and Smectite gel “Symbiter Forte” can play a synergistically enhanced role in the effective treatment of NAFLD (Kobyliak et al., 2018b). In a clinical trial, 80 patients with NAFLD were given symbiotic supplements (including six probiotics and fructooligosaccharides) and placebos respectively. Symbiotic supplements have been found to relieve steatosis in patients with NAFLD (). Probiotic mixtures have been found to act on lipid profiles, leptin and inflammatory biomarkers to treat fatty liver disease (). Similarly, Crommen et al (). have shown in clinical trials that a mixture of multi-strain probiotic powder and specific trace microelements can effectively improve NAFLD-related markers in obese patients undergoing miniature gastric bypass surgery.
2.2.4 Probiotics related products
The possible impact of probiotics-related products on NAFLD has garnered significant attention. Kefir is a probiotic beverage that contains a variety of lactic acid bacteria and yeast. In the NAFLD mouse model, the administration of Kefir has been shown to regulate the composition of intestinal microbiota and fungal flora, leading to effective treatment of the condition (Kim et al., 2017). Kombucha is a kind of natural nonalcoholic fermented beverage with probiotic characteristics produced by symbiotic culture of bacteria and yeast. Moreira et al (Moreira et al., 2022). successfully confirmed that Kombucha can improve glucose tolerance and reduce liver steatosis in obese mice through NAFLD mouse experiments. Moreover, Konda et al (Konda et al., 2020). found that probiotics banana juice treated by pectinase can effectively deal with liver steatosis to effectively prevent NASH.
2.2.5 Probiotics plus lifestyle intervention
It is worth mentioning that probiotic supplements in conjunction with lifestyle interventions have also been confirmed to have positive effects on blood glucose parameters and leptin levels in patients with NAFLD (). Lifestyle changes with multi-strain probiotic therapy can significantly improve liver histology, the levels of alanine aminotransferase and cytokine in patients with NAFLD (). Exercise training and probiotics are also recommended as effective treatments for NAFLD. Hosseini et al (Hosseini et al., 2022). proved that intensive interval training and Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG can minimize damage to liver tissue cell and inflammation caused by NAFLD.
2.3 Future expectations
The aforementioned studies have consistently demonstrated the efficacy of probiotics and their associated products in the prevention and treatment of NAFLD. Furthermore, there is a growing trend in research towards the clinical application of these practical products. The application prospect of probiotics and its related products in NAFLD is worth anticipation and further promoting.
The mechanism underlying the therapeutic effects of probiotics in NAFLD treatment has consistently been a focal point of research. It is believed that distinct probiotic strains may exert their effects through different mediating mechanisms. Utilizing probiotics allows researchers to observe changes in the individual’s gut microbiota composition, while investigating how these changes impact disease progression remains a key area for exploration. With the continuous advancement of technical tools, an increasing number of research methods have been employed to investigate the mechanism underlying probiotic treatment of NAFLD. However, the current understanding of the precise mechanism by which probiotics exert their effects in NAFLD treatment remains limited. Only through the comprehensive utilization of various research techniques can a more comprehensive understanding of the mediating mechanisms be achieved. Researchers must devote further efforts to clarify the specific mechanism through which different probiotics play a role in NAFLD.
3 The mediating mechanism of probiotics in the treatment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
Probiotic regulation offers an effective strategy for the treatment and prevention of NAFLD, particularly in the absence of clear pharmacological interventions for steatosis. Understanding the mediating mechanisms underlying probiotic therapy in NAFLD has remained a central focus of research focus of research. Probiotics have the ability to modulate the physiological function and metabolic status of patients with NAFLD by influencing the composition, abundance and balance of intestinal microflora. To investigate the mediating mechanism of probiotic therapy, it is essential to commence with a comprehensive exploration of the common pathogenesis and etiology of NAFLD.
The ecological imbalance of intestinal flora, alterations of intestinal cell permeability, liver injury, endoplasmic reticulum stress, abnormal activation of cellular signaling pathway, as well as dietary and genetic factors of patients, have all been implicated in the occurrence of NAFLD (Williams et al.,; Mouzaki and Allard, 2012; Goodwin et al., 2013). The second part of the review aims to comprehensively explore the intricate mediating mechanisms of probiotics in NAFLD treatment, contributing to the development of novel therapeutic approaches for the disease.
3.1 Maintaining the integrity of intestinal epithelial cells: anti-oxidation and anti-inflammation
3.1.1 Reactive oxygen species and Intestinal inflammation
Intestinal inflammation can influence the intestinal-liver axis, damaging the intestinal barrier, leading to bacterial translocation, activating the immune system response, and triggering a series of pro-inflammatory pathways in the liver, thereby accelerating the process of NAFLD (Pierantonelli and Svegliati-Baroni, 2019).
ROS in human body is mainly produced in endoplasmic reticulum, peroxisome, mitochondria and other organelles. Specially, Reactive oxygen species (ROS) production mainly occurs during the mitochondrial electron transport chain process (Novak and Mollen, 2015). However, excessive ROS can impede electron transfer, leading to mitochondrial damage and disruption of biological function of mitochondria and cell homeostasis, ultimately causing cell death (Kiffin et al., 2006; Scherz-Shouval and Elazar, 2007; Novak and Mollen, 2015).
The excessive accumulation of ROS in cells result in oxidative stress, characterized by an imbalance between ROS production and clearance in cells and tissues. In response to oxidative stress, cells activate various defense mechanisms or undergo cell death. Oxidative stress can induce intestinal mucosal damage, increase intestinal epithelial barrier permeability, facilitate bacterial invasion, stimulate immune response and initiate the pathological process of intestinal inflammation. The key manifestations of active intestinal inflammation include immune cell infiltration and neutrophilic granulocytosis (Goyette et al., 2007).
3.1.2 Probiotics prevent and treat NAFLD by preventing intestinal inflammation and antioxidation
3.1.2.1 Genetic engineering Escherichia coli
Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 (ECN) is a genetically engineered oral probiotics with good safety and can assist in the treatment of many kinds of diseases (Lynch et al., 2022; Zhou et al., 2022). ECN-pE, an oral probiotic, was genetically modified to enhance the expression of catalase and superoxide dismutase (SOD) for the treatment of intestinal inflammation. ZhouJ et al. evaluated the SOD competence of different ECN subtypes by assessing their ability to scavenge superoxide. Notably, ECN-pE(C/A)2 exhibited strong SOD activity, promoting significant colon tissue repair and alleviating intestinal inflammation (Zhou et al., 2022).
3.1.2.2 Bifidobacterium longum
Bifidobacterium longum have been demonstrated their ability to inhibit the development of intestinal inflammation by regulating immune system balance, enhancing acetate production and improving intestinal mucosal barrier function (Underwood et al., 2015; ; Yao et al., 2021). In a study conducted by F.A.Abrantes et al., it was shown that Bifidobacterium longum B.longum51A effectively reverse colitis-induced increase of intestinal permeability and reduce the degree of colonic lesions (). Its molecular biological mechanism is alleviating a series of changes during intestinal inflammation, such as decreased eosinophil peroxidase level, increase of IL-1β level, the significant increase of immunoglobulin concentration and the increase of inflammatory markers (; ).
S. Yan et al. confirmed that the metabolites of B.longum YS108R contain antioxidant substances (Yao et al., 2021). Yusheng Wang et al. demonstrated that the supernatant from cultured B.longum CCFM752 exhibits antioxidant effect on cells, enhancing catalase activity and decreasing NADPH oxidase activity. In addition, it has been proved that Lactobacillus sake and other Lactobacillus probiotics can also relieve the symptoms of NAFLD through antioxidant mechanism (Wang et al., 2021).
Genetic engineering Escherichia coli and Bifidobacterium longum can improve the antioxidant level of cells and tissues, mitigate ROS-induced cell damage, protect intestinal mucosal barrier and effectively inhibit NAFLD triggered by intestinal inflammation. These findings highlight their significant clinical application value.
3.2 Regulating lipid metabolism to relieve NAFLD
3.2.1 Core pathological process
The main cause of NAFLD is the excessive accumulation of fat in the liver (Kanuri and Bergheim, 2013; Zeigerer, 2021). The fat accumulated in the liver can originate from various sources, including fatty acids digested and absorbed by intestinal epithelial cells from food, de novo synthesis of body fat, adipose tissue fat transport and conversion of other substances (Jones, 2016; ; ; ). The liver, as the central organ of fatty acid metabolism, will experience fat accumulation when the production of fatty acids exceeds their consumption, including fat transport (). In the existing scientific research, it has been found that some probiotics can alleviate NAFLD symptoms by modulating lipid metabolism in the liver, offering potential avenues for clinical treatment of NAFLD.
3.2.2 Mechanism of Lactobacillus sake regulating lipid metabolism in liver
Lactobacillus sake has good antibacterial and antioxidant effects, exhibiting excellent antibacterial efficacy, safety and tolerance in the body (Schillinger and Lücke, 1989; ; ). Huong Thi Nguyen et al. evaluated the high anti-lipid effect of Lactobacillus sake MJM60958 in HepG2 cells and its therapeutic effect for high-fat diet induced NAFLD mouse model. Among different strains, MJM60958 showed the most pronounced effect in inhibiting lipid synthesis. It reduced lipid accumulation in hepatocytes, relieving NAFLD by decreasing serum level of AST, ALT, Triglyceride (TG) and total cholesterol (TCHO), which serve as key markers of NAFLD (Nguyen et al., 2022a).
3.2.3 Mechanism of Lactobacillus salivarius regulating lipid metabolism in liver
Peroxisome proliferator activated receptors (PPAR) α, β/δ and γ regulate lipid homeostasis in the liver. Among them, PPARα is a key nuclear receptor, which controls the oxidation rate of fatty acids in mitochondria and is also related to carnitine palmitoyltransferase-1. Specifically, PPARα controls the oxidation of fatty acids in mitochondria, and PPARγ is involved in adipogenesis and lipid storage. Additionally, the AMPK pathway, which is activated in response to metabolic stress, plays a significant role in regulating lipid metabolism (Wang Y. et al., 2020).
In the study of Lihui Zhu et al., the probiotic strain Lactobacillus salivarius SNK-6 (L.salivarius SNK-6) demonstrated beneficial effects in a lying hen model of NAFLD. The findings revealed that the inhibition of miR-130a-5p significantly increased the expression of PPAR α, PPAR γ, fatty acid binding protein 4 (FABP4), SREBP1 and fatty acid synthase (FASN) related genes. Conversely, the administration of L.salivarius SNK6 up-regulate the expression of miR-130a-5p and down-regulate the expression of MBOAT2. Through the miR-130a-5p/MBOAT2 pathway, Lactobacillus salivary SNK-6 reduced the activity of ALT and AST and inhibited hepatic fat deposition, thus relieving the condition of NAFLD (Zhu et al., 2022).
3.2.4 Mechanism of Lactobacillus plantarum regulating lipid metabolism in liver
Studies conducted by Chuan Li et al. have shown that L.plantarum NCU116 alleviate hepatic fat accumulation by downregulating fat production and upregulating the expression of genes associated with fat decomposition and fatty acid oxidation. The experimental group treated with L.plantarum NCU116 showed increased expression of PPAR α, PPAR γ, PPAR δ, PGC1 α and CPT1 α, leading to effective reduction of hepatic fat accumulation (Li et al., 2014).
3.2.5 Mechanism of Lactobacillus reuteri regulating lipid metabolism in liver
Carmen Tenorio-Jim é nez et al. conducted the clinical evaluation trial of Lactobacillus reuteri V3401 on NAFLD. Sixty participants (aged 18 to 65 years) diagnosed with IRS were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either a daily dose of placebo or 5×109 colony-forming units of L. reuteri V3401. The study aimed to explore the mediating mechanism of L. reuteri in relieving NAFLD by detecting human serum level of LPS, insulin resistance and liver steatosis after the application of L. reuteri. Currently, the study is still in the stage of experiment and data analysis (Tenorio-Jiménez et al., 2018).
3.3 Probiotics relieve NAFLD by regulating the levels of different cytokines
3.3.1 Effect of Bifidobacterium on the level of related cytokines
Tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin 1 beta (IL-1β) and interleukin-18 (IL-18) are the key cytokines in the pathogenesis of NAFLD (Stojsavljević et al., 2014; ).
Experiments evidence has demonstrated that Lactobacillus sake MJM60958 relieved NAFLD by reducing the level of TNF-α (). In a Study by Moon Ho Do et al., mice fed with high-fat diet exhibited increased expression of genes encoding inflammatory cytokines TNF-α, IL-1β and IL-6. However, mice treated with a high dose of Bifidobacterium lactose MG741 reversed the expression trend of these genes, improving intestinal permeability and offering potential therapeutic benefits for NAFLD ().
3.3.2 Effect of multiple probiotics combination on the level of related cytokines
After clinical intervention with multiprobiotic “Symbiter” in patients with NAFLD, the levels of AST and GGT which are related with fat synthesis and the levels of TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8 and INF-γ decreased significantly. The fatty liver index (FLI) was significantly improved (Kobyliak et al., 2018a; Kobyliak et al., 2018c).
3.3.3 The function of IL-17
The regulation of cytokines and improvement of the tissue microenvironment are important for treating liver inflammation and alleviating autoimmune diseases. Interleukin-17 (IL-17) has shown promising potential in both research and application (Zhang et al., 2015). IL-17 serves as a key initiator of the inflammatory response, promoting the release of inflammatory cytokines and inducing an inflammatory cascade. Upon binding to its receptor, IL-17 can play its biological role through mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway and activating transcription factors such as activator protein-1 (AP1), CCAAT-enhancer-binding proteins (C/EBPs) and nuclear transcription factor κB (NF-κB) (Monin and Gaffen, 2018).
The clinical studies of Chung-Hsing Wang et al. showed that the serum levels of IL-8, IL-17, MIP-1β and TNF-α in patients with type I diabetes treated with Bifidobacterium animalis, Akkermansia muciniphila and Lactobacillus salivarius were significantly lower than those without probiotics (Wang et al., 2022).
However, experimental study by Shuying He et al. has shown that IL-17 from Th17 cells can restore the function of intestinal epithelial tissue and barrier and maintain the integrity of intestinal barrier (He et al., 2022). To some extent, this finding highlighted the dual regulatory effect of IL-17 varing depending on the specific circumstances.
Currently, there is a scarcity of animal experiments and clinical trials investigating the correlation between IL-17 level changes and NAFLD improvement following probiotic use. Further research is needed to clucidate the relationship between IL-17 levels and NAFLD.
3.3.4 Blueberry combined with probiotics to regulate the level of cytokines
3.3.4.1 Effects of bioactive substances from blueberry on inflammation and oxidative stress
According to Felgus-Lavefve L et al., the bioactive molecules of blueberry inhibited inflammation and oxidative stress by downregulating NF-κB pathway, reducing ROS levels and attenuating lipid peroxidation. The understanding of the main molecular mechanisms of blueberry chemicals in the cell model is progressively advancing (Felgus-Lavefve et al., 2022).
Tarfa Albrahim et al. showed that the contents of antioxidant enzymes, glutathione and lipid peroxidation in rats fed blueberries increased, while the activities of inflammatory mediators (TNF-α, IL-6 and nuclear factor kappa light chain enhancer of activated B cells) and fibrosis marker transforming growth factor β1 (TGF-β1) in rat liver decreased significantly ().
The studies above demonstrate the significant role of blueberry’s biological activity in anti-oxidation and anti-inflammation, leading to a notable reduction of inflammatory mediators-related cytokines. When blueberry is used in combination with probiotics, it exhibits distinct effects on the level of cytokines in NAFLD model.
3.3.4.2 Blueberry in combination with probiotics & important cytokine IL-22 and its molecular pathway
Studies by Juanjuan Zhu et al. have shown that blueberry combined with probiotics can alleviate NAFLD through IL-22-mediated Janus kinase 1 (JAK1)/signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3)/Bcl-2-associated X protein (BAX) signal pathway (Zhu et al., 2018).
The expression of IL-22, JAK1 and STAT3 in NAFLD model significantly decreased, while the expression of apoptosis factor BAX showed a marked increase. However, the administration of probiotics resulted in a substantial increase in the levels of IL-22, JAK1 and STAT3 in NAFLD model, while decreased the level of BAX. Similarly, the suppression of IL-22 hindered the ability of probiotics to promote the expression of JAK1, STAT3 and BAX (Zhu et al., 2018). Probiotics can activate the JAK1/STAT3 signal pathway, inhibit the apoptosis factor BAX and reduce lipid deposition in vitro through IL-22 (Zenewicz, 2018; Zhu et al., 2018).
In addition, IL-22, acts as a key regulator of epithelial homeostasis, playing a critical role in preserving the function of epithelial barrier (Zenewicz, 2018; Patnaude et al., 2021).
3.3.4.3 Microflora secreting IL-22
IL-22 secreted by engineered Lactobacillus reuteri significantly reduced liver weight and triglyceride content in NAFLD model (Oh et al., 2020). It can be seen that IL-22 can alleviate the development of NAFLD.
IL-22, a member of the IL-20 subfamily, controls lipid metabolism in the liver by activating the above signaling pathways (Pan et al., 2014). As a therapeutic protein, IL-22 holds promising prospects for mitigating nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.
3.4 Probiotics relieve NAFLD by regulating intestinal microflora
3.4.1 Intestinal microbiota and imbalance
Intestinal microbiota encompasses the diverse microbial community residing in the human intestinal tract. These microorganisms are involved in the regulation of metabolism and physiological activities. Among the various microbial communities in intestinal tract, the bacterial community is of utmost importance (Pascale et al., 2018). Imbalance of intestinal microflora, or intestinal microecological dysbiosis, refers to disruptions in the composition, activity or distribution of microorganisms within the intestines. Such ecological disturbances or alterations in normal intestinal flora will affect intestinal permeability, intestinal mucosal barrier integrity and normal intestinal peristalsis, consequently resulting in a series of diseases ().
3.4.2 The relationship between intestinal microbiome and NAFLD and related mechanism
Changes in intestinal microflora composition can alleviate or aggravate NAFLD through a variety of mechanisms. The main mechanisms include affecting fat production, modulating dietary energy metabolism, impacting related gene expression in the cholic acid metabolism signal pathway, and altering intestinal permeability. However, further research is required to fully understand the relationship between these factors and the development or progress of NAFLD (Safari and Gérard, 2019).
In terms of dietary energy metabolism, researches by Bäckhed F et al. have shown that germ-free mice, compare to those with intestinal microbiota, are resistant to high-fat or high-sugar diet-induced obesity. Intestinal bacteria produce secretory bacterial enzymes that facilitate the breakdown and digestion of polysaccharides in food, enhancing the absorption of food nutrients (; ).
Alterations in intestinal flora can impact the integrity of the intestinal mucosal barrier including the structure of intestinal mucous layer, antimicrobial peptides and tight junction proteins, leading to increased intestinal permeability. This association is closely linked to the severity, occurrence and progression of NAFLD (Giorgio et al., 2014).
Bile acid can not only promote fat absorption, but also play the role of signal molecules in self-metabolism (Jiang et al., 2015; Safari and Gérard, 2019). In terms of bile acid composition changes, intestinal flora changes can increase bile acid metabolites and reduce liver triglyceride accumulation by inhibiting intestinal farnesol X receptor (FXR) signal. These effects are primarily achieved through the down-regulation of liver sterol regulatory element-binding protein 1C (SREBP1C) and decrease of de novo synthesis of fat. Inhibition of intestinal FXR/ceramide axis can mediate the development of NAFLD related with intestinal microbiota (Jiang et al., 2015).
3.4.3 Potential probiotics in the treatment of NAFLD based on regulation of intestinal microbiota and its mechanism
In the study of Hu et al., F. prausnitzii strains (A2-165, LB8, ZF21, PL45 and LC49) could alleviate the symptoms related to glucose tolerance, liver steatosis, intestinal inflammation and oxidative stress in the NAFLD model (Hu et al., 2022). Notably, strains LC49 and LB8 were found to increase the production of short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) and regulate the composition of intestinal flora. The core microflora related to NAFLD include Odoribacter, Roseburia, Erysipelatoclostridium, Tyzzerella, Faecalibaculum, Blautia and Acetatifactor. Among them, the effects of Erysipelatoclostridium, Tyzzerella, Faecalibaculum, Blautia and Acetatifactor on the progress of NAFLD could be reversed by F.prausnitzii LC49 and LB8.
Patients with NAFLD exhibited a significantly lower total bacterial load compared to normal subjects, accompanied by a reduction in the abundance of various normal bacteria in the intestinal wall, including Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus, Lactococcus, True bacillus and Propionibacterium (Vakhrushev et al., 2022).
F.prausnitzii LC49 and LB8 can enrich the abundance of Lactobacillus, Enterobacter ileum, Bacillus faecalis, Duboxi and Bifidobacterium, thus positively influences the metabolism of carbohydrates, amino acids and fatty acids. Moreover, F.prausnitzii LC49 and LB8 show significant anti-NAFLD effects and possess microbial regulatory properties, suggesting their potential as probiotic agents for the treatment of NAFLD (Hu et al., 2022; Shu et al., 2025).
4 Conclusions
While significant progress has been made in understanding the therapeutic potential of probiotics for NAFLD, several limitations persist in the current body of research. First, many studies lack long-term follow-up data, which is crucial to determine the sustainability of probiotic effects. Additionally, variations in probiotic strains and dosages across studies make it difficult to draw definitive conclusions about their optimal use. Most clinical trials have small sample sizes, limiting their generalizability. Furthermore, the mechanisms through which probiotics exert their therapeutic effects in NAFLD are not fully understood, with many studies relying on indirect markers of disease progression.
Despite promising therapeutic effects, challenges remain in probiotic application for MAFLD, such as the strain-specific nature of probiotics, host genetic and microbiota variability, and concerns regarding long-term safety and regulatory standardization. These issues underscore the need for rigorous clinical trials and mechanistic studies to validate efficacy and safety across diverse populations.
Future research should focus on large-scale, multicenter trials with longer follow-up periods. A more standardized approach to the selection and dosage of probiotic strains is essential for comparing results across studies. Furthermore, research into the specific molecular mechanisms by which probiotics modulate gut microbiota and influence liver function is crucial for developing targeted therapies. There is also a need for studies that explore the combined effects of probiotics with other therapeutic interventions, such as dietary modifications or pharmaceutical agents. Addressing these challenges will provide clearer insights into the role of probiotics in managing NAFLD (Figure 1).
Figure 1
Statements
Author contributions
XL: Writing – review & editing, Visualization, Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Methodology, Validation, Investigation, Resources. WH: Software, Data curation, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization, Formal analysis. CL: Writing – original draft, Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing, Methodology, Visualization, Investigation, Validation. ZF: Writing – review & editing, Project administration, Investigation, Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis. SS: Formal analysis, Project administration, Data curation, Methodology, Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing. MC: Writing – review & editing, Investigation, Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Project administration, Data curation. WG: Software, Investigation, Conceptualization, Project administration, Writing – review & editing, Methodology. SZ: Project administration, Validation, Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Investigation, Resources, Funding acquisition. ZY: Supervision, Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing, Funding acquisition, Writing – original draft, Resources, Visualization, Project administration.
Funding
The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This study was supported by grants from the Hainan Province Science and Technology Special Fund (ZDYF2025LCLH012), the National Key R&D Program of China (2023YFC2306800), the Key Research and Development Project of Zhejiang Province (2024C03149 and 2023C03046), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82470690 and 92159202), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2025ZFJH03).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
AbrantesF. A.NascimentoB. B.AndradeM. E. R.de BarrosP. A. V.CartelleC. T.MartinsF. S.et al. (2020). Treatment with Bifidobacterium longum 51A attenuates intestinal damage and inflammatory response in experimental colitis. Benef Microbes11, 47–57. doi: 10.3920/BM2019.0098
2
AhmedL. A.SalemM. B.El-DinS. H. S.LakkanyN. M.AhmedH. O.NasrS. M. (2020). Gut microbiota modulation as a promising therapy with metformin in rats with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: Role of LPS/TLR4 and autophagy pathways. Eur. J. Pharmacol887, 173461. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2020.173461
3
AhnS. B.JunD. W.KangB.-K.LimJ. H.LimS.ChungM.-J. (2019). Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of a multispecies probiotic mixture in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Sci. Rep9, 1–9. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-42059-3
4
AlboraieM.YoussefN.SheriefA. F.AfifyS.WifiM. N.OmranD.et al. (2019). Egyptian liver library: an indexed database for liver disease evidence in Egypt. Arab J. Gastroenterol20, 109–113. doi: 10.1016/j.ajg.2019.05.004
5
AlbrahimT.AlonaziM. (2022). Effect of blueberry extract on liver in aged rats. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev2022, 3490776. doi: 10.1155/2022/3490776
6
AllerR.De LuisD.IzaolaO.CondeR.Gonzalez SagradoM.PrimoD. (2011). Effect of a probiotic on liver aminotransferases in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease patients: a double blind randomized clinical trial. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci15, 1090–1095.
7
Al-MuzafarH. M.AminK. A. (2017). Probiotic mixture improves fatty liver disease by virtue of its action on lipid profiles, leptin, and inflammatory biomarkers. BMC complementary Altern. Med17, 1–9. doi: 10.1186/s12906-016-1540-z
8
Alves-BezerraM.CohenD. E. (2017). Triglyceride metabolism in the liver. Compr. Physiol8, 1–8. doi: 10.1002/cphy.c170012
9
AmanatidouA.SmidE. J.BennikM. H.GorrisL. G. (2001). Antioxidative properties of Lactobacillus sake upon exposure to elevated oxygen concentrations. FEMS Microbiol. Lett203, 87–94. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2001.tb10825.x
10
AsgharianA.AskariG.EsmailzadeA.FeiziA.MohammadiV. (2016). The effect of symbiotic supplementation on liver enzymes, C-reactive protein and ultrasound findings in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a clinical trial. . Int. J. Prev. Med7, 59. doi: 10.4103/2008-7802.178533
11
AzarangA.FarshadO.OmmatiM. M.JamshidzadehA.HeydariR.AbootalebiS. N. (2020). Protective role of probiotic supplements in hepatic steatosis: a rat model study. . BioMed. Res. Int2020, 1–15. doi: 10.1155/2020/5487659
12
BäckhedF.DingH.WangT.HooperL. V.KohG. Y.NagyA.et al. (2004). The gut microbiota as an environmental factor that regulates fat storage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A101, 15718–15723. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0407076101
13
BäckhedF.ManchesterJ. K.SemenkovichC. F.GordonJ. I. (2007). Mechanisms underlying the resistance to diet-induced obesity in germ-free mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A104, 979–984. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0605374104
14
BadmusO. O.HillhouseS. A.AndersonC. D.HindsT. D.StecD. E. (2022). Molecular mechanisms of metabolic associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD): functional analysis of lipid metabolism pathways. Clin. Sci. (Lond)136, 1347–1366. doi: 10.1042/CS20220572
15
BehrouzV.JazayeriS.AryaeianN.ZahediM. J.HosseiniF. (2017). Effects of probiotic and prebiotic supplementation on leptin, adiponectin, and glycemic parameters in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a randomized clinical trial. Middle East J. Digestive Dis9, 150. doi: 10.15171/mejdd.2017.66
16
BrennanP. N.ElsharkawyA. M.KendallT. J.LoombaR.MannD. A.FallowfieldJ. A. (2023). Antifibrotic therapy in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: time for a human-centric approach. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol2, 1–10. doi: 10.1038/s41575-023-00796-x
17
CanakisA.HaroonM.WeberH. C. (2020). Irritable bowel syndrome and gut microbiota. Curr. Opin. Endocrinol. Diabetes Obes27, 28–35. doi: 10.1097/MED.0000000000000523
18
CarottiS.AquilanoK.ValentiniF.RuggieroS.AllettoF.MoriniS.et al. (2020). An overview of deregulated lipid metabolism in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease with special focus on lysosomal acid lipase. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest Liver Physiol319, G469–G480. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00049.2020
19
ChichlowskiM.ShahN.WamplerJ. L.WuS. S.VanderhoofJ. A. (2020). Bifidobacterium longum Subspecies infantis (B. infantis) in Pediatric Nutrition: Current State of Knowledge. Nutrients12, 1581. doi: 10.3390/nu12061581
20
CrommenS.RheinwaltK. P.PlamperA.SimonM.-C.RöslerD.FimmersR. (2022). A specifically tailored multistrain probiotic and micronutrient mixture affects nonalcoholic fatty liver disease—Related markers in patients with obesity after mini gastric bypass surgery. J. Nutr152, 408–418. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxab392
21
DerosaG.GuastiL.D’angeloA.MartinottiC.ValentinoM. C.Di MatteoS. (2022). Probiotic therapy with VSL3® in patients with NAFLD: A randomized clinical trial. Front. Nutr9.
22
DoM. H.OhM.-J.LeeH.-B.KangC.-H.YooG.ParkH.-Y. (2022). Bifidobacterium animalis ssp. lactis MG741 Reduces Body Weight and Ameliorates Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease via Improving the Gut Permeability and Amelioration of Inflammatory Cytokines. . Nutrients14, 1965. doi: 10.3390/nu14091965
23
DusejaA.AcharyaS. K.MehtaM.ChhabraS.Shalimar RanaS.DasA. (2019). High potency multistrain probiotic improves liver histology in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD): A randomised, double-blind, proof of concept study. BMJ Open Gastroenterol6, e000315. doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2019-000315
24
DÜzM.DoĞanY. N.DoĞanİ. (2020). Antioxidant activitiy of Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus sake and Lactobacillus curvatus strains isolated from fermented Turkish Sucuk. Acad. Bras. Cienc92, e20200105. doi: 10.1590/0001-3765202020200105
25
DvorakA. M.EstrellaP.IshizakaT. (1994). Vesicular transport of peroxidase in human eosinophilic myelocytes. Clin. Exp. Allergy24, 10–18. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.1994.tb00910.x
26
EndoH.NiiokaM.KobayashiN.TanakaM.WatanabeT. (2013). Butyrate-producing probiotics reduce nonalcoholic fatty liver disease progression in rats: new insight into the probiotics for the gut-liver axis. PloS One8, e63388. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063388
27
EslamM.NewsomeP. N.AnsteeQ. M.AnsteeQ. M.TargherG.Romero-GomezM. (2020). A new definition for metabolic associated fatty liver disease: an international expert consensus statement. J. Hepatol. 73(1):202–209. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.03.039
28
EspositoE.IaconoA.BiancoG.AutoreG.CuzzocreaS.VajroP. (2009). Probiotics reduce the inflammatory response induced by a high-fat diet in the liver of young rats. J. Nutr139, 905–911. doi: 10.3945/jn.108.101808
29
EzquerroS.MochaF.FrühbeckG.Guzmán-RuizR.ValentíV.MuguetaC.et al. (2019). Ghrelin reduces TNF-α-induced human hepatocyte apoptosis, autophagy, and pyroptosis: role in obesity-associated NAFLD. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab104, 21–37. doi: 10.1210/jc.2018-01171
30
FamouriF.ShariatZ.HashemipourM.KeikhaM.KelishadiR. (2017). Effects of probiotics on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in obese children and adolescents. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr64, 413–417. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000001422
31
Felgus-LavefveL.HowardL.AdamsS. H.BaumJ. I. (2022). The effects of blueberry phytochemicals on cell models of inflammation and oxidative stress. Adv. Nutr13, 1279–1309. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmab137
32
FontanaL.Plaza-DíazJ.Robles-BolívarP.Valente-GodínezH.Sáez-LaraM. J.Abadía-MolinaF. (2021). Bifidobacterium breve CNCM I-4035, Lactobacillus paracasei CNCM I-4034 and Lactobacillus rhamnosus CNCM I-4036 Modulate Macrophage Gene Expression and Ameliorate Damage Markers in the Liver of Zucker-Lepr fa/fa Rats. Nutrients13, 202. doi: 10.3390/nu13010202
33
FriedmanS. L.Neuschwander-TetriB. A.RinellaM.SanyalA. J. (2018). Mechanisms of NAFLD development and therapeutic strategies. Nat. Med24, 908–922. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0104-9
34
GaoX.ZhuY.WenY.LiuG.WanC. (2016). Efficacy of probiotics in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in adult and children: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Hepatol. Res46, 1226–1233. doi: 10.1111/hepr.12671
35
GengW.ZhangY.YangJ.ZhangJ.ZhaoJ.WangJ. (2022). Identification of a novel probiotic and its protective effects on NAFLD via modulating gut microbial community. J. Sci. Food Agric. 102 (11), 4620–4628. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.11820
36
GiorgioV.MieleL.PrincipessaL.FerrettiF.VillaM. P.NegroV.et al. (2014). Intestinal permeability is increased in children with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, and correlates with liver disease severity. Dig Liver Dis46, 556–560. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2014.02.010
37
GoodwinM.HerathC.JiaZ.LeungC.CoughlanM. T.ForbesJ.et al. (2013). Advanced glycation end products augment experimental hepatic fibrosis. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol28, 369–376. doi: 10.1111/jgh.12042
38
GoyetteP.LabbéC.TrinhT. T.XavierR. J.RiouxJ. D. (2007). Molecular pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease: genotypes, phenotypes and personalized medicine. Ann. Med39, 177–199. doi: 10.1080/07853890701197615
39
HanyN. M.EissaS.BasyouniM.HasaninA. H.Aboul-ElaY. M.Abo ElmagdN. M. (2022). Modulation of hepatic stellate cells by Mutaflor® probiotic in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease management. J. Trans. Med20, 1–19. doi: 10.1186/s12967-022-03543-z
40
HeS.CuiS.SongW.JiangY.ChenH.LiaoD.et al. (2022). Interleukin-17 weakens the NAFLD/NASH process by facilitating intestinal barrier restoration depending on the gut microbiota. mBio13, e0368821. doi: 10.1128/mbio.03688-21
41
HosseiniH. M.ShirvaniH.AghaeiF.ArabzadehE.HofmeisterM. (2022). Ameliorative effects of high intensity interval training and Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG against tetracycline-induced fatty liver in rats: a gene expression profiling comparative study. EXCLI J21, 991–1006. doi: 10.17179/excli2022-4791
42
HuW.GaoW.LiuZ.FangZ.WangH.ZhaoJ.. (2022). Specific strains of faecalibacterium prausnitzii ameliorate nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in mice in association with gut microbiota regulation. Nutrients14, 2945. doi: 10.3390/nu14142945
43
HuD.YangW.MaoP.ChengM. (2021). Combined amelioration of prebiotic resveratrol and probiotic Bifidobacteria on obesity and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Nutr. Cancer73, 652–661. doi: 10.1080/01635581.2020.1767166
44
HuangW.WangG.XiaY.XiongZ.AiL. (2020). Bile salt hydrolase-overexpressing Lactobacillus strains can improve hepatic lipid accumulation in vitro in an NAFLD cell model. Food Nutr. Res64. doi: 10.29219/fnr.v64.3751
45
HuangY.WangX.ZhangL.ZhengK.XiongJ.LiJ. (2022). Effect of probiotics therapy on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. . Comput. Math. Methods Med2022. doi: 10.1155/2022/7888076
46
JangH. R.ParkH.-J.KangD.ChungH.NamM. H.LeeY.et al. (2019). A protective mechanism of probiotic Lactobacillus against hepatic steatosis via reducing host intestinal fatty acid absorption. Exp. Mol. Med51, 1–14. doi: 10.1038/s12276-019-0352-x
47
JavadiL.KhoshbatenM.SafaiyanA.GhavamiM.AbbasiM. M.GargariB. P. (2018). Pro-and prebiotic effects on oxidative stress and inflammatory markers in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Asia Pacific J. Clin. Nutr27, 1031–1039. doi: 10.6133/apjcn.042018.05
48
JiangC.XieC.LiF.ZhangL.NicholsR. G.KrauszK. W.et al. (2015). Intestinal farnesoid X receptor signaling promotes nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J. Clin. Invest125, 386–402. doi: 10.1172/JCI76738
49
JonesJ. G. (2016). Hepatic glucose and lipid metabolism. Diabetologia59, 1098–1103. doi: 10.1007/s00125-016-3940-5
50
KanuriG.BergheimI. (2013). In vitro and in vivo models of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Int. J. Mol. Sci14, 11963–11980. doi: 10.3390/ijms140611963
51
KhanM. Y.MihaliA. B.RawalaM. S.AslamA.SiddiquiW. J. (2019). The promising role of probiotic and synbiotic therapy in aminotransferase levels and inflammatory markers in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease–a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol31, 703–715. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001371
52
KiffinR.BandyopadhyayU.CuervoA. M. (2006). Oxidative stress and autophagy. Antioxid Redox Signal8, 152–162. doi: 10.1089/ars.2006.8.152
53
KimD.-H.KimH.JeongD.KangI.-B.ChonJ.-W.KimH.-S.et al. (2017). Kefir alleviates obesity and hepatic steatosis in high-fat diet-fed mice by modulation of gut microbiota and mycobiota: targeted and untargeted community analysis with correlation of biomarkers. J. Nutr. Biochem44, 35–43. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2017.02.014
54
KimB.KwonJ.KimM.-S.ParkH.JiY.HolzapfelW. (2018). Protective effects of Bacillus probiotics against high-fat diet-induced metabolic disorders in mice. PloS One13, e0210120. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210120
55
KimJ. E.LeeJ. Y.KangC.-H. (2022). Limosilactobacillus fermentum MG4295 improves hyperglycemia in high-fat diet-induced mice. Foods11, 231. doi: 10.3390/foods11020231
56
KobyliakN.AbenavoliL.FalalyeyevaT.MykhalchyshynG.BoccutoL.KononenkoL. (2018a). Beneficial effects of probiotic combination with omega-3 fatty acids in NAFLD: a randomized clinical study. Minerva Medica109 (6), 418–428. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4806.18.05845-7
57
KobyliakN.AbenavoliL.FalalyeyevaT.BeregovaT. (2018b). Efficacy of probiotics and smectite in rats with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Ann. Hepatol17, 153–161. doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0010.7547
58
KobyliakN.AbenavoliL.MykhalchyshynG.KononenkoL.BoccutoL.KyriienkoD. (2018c). A multi-strain probiotic reduces the fatty liver index, cytokines and aminotransferase levels in NAFLD patients: evidence from a randomized clinical trial. doi: 10.15403/jgld.2014.1121.271.kby
59
KobyliakN.FalalyeyevaT.BodnarP.BeregovaT. (2017). Probiotics supplemented with omega-3 fatty acids are more effective for hepatic steatosis reduction in an animal model of obesity. Probiotics Antimicrobial Proteins9, 123–130. doi: 10.1007/s12602-016-9230-1
60
KondaP. Y.PoondlaV.JaiswalK. K.DasariS.UyyalaR.SurtineniV. P. (2020). Pathophysiology of high fat diet induced obesity: impact of probiotic banana juice on obesity associated complications and hepatosteatosis. Sci. Rep10, 1–17. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-73670-4
61
LiC.NieS. P.ZhuK. X.DingQ.LiC.XiongT.et al. (2014). Lactobacillus plantarum NCU116 improves liver function, oxidative stress and lipid metabolism in rats with high fat diet induced non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Food Funct5, 3216–3223. doi: 10.1039/C4FO00549J
62
LiuZ.-S.LiP.-L.KuY.-W.ChenP.-W. (2022). Oral administration of recombinant lactoferrin-expressing probiotics ameliorates diet-induced lipid accumulation and inflammation in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in mice. Microorganisms10, 2215. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10112215
63
LoguercioC.FedericoA.TuccilloC.TerraccianoF.D'AuriaM. V.De SimoneC. (2005). Beneficial effects of a probiotic VSL3 on parameters of liver dysfunction in chronic liver diseases. J. Clin. Gastroenterol39, 540–543. doi: 10.1097/01.mcg.0000165671.25272.0f
64
LomanB. R.Hernández-SaavedraD.AnR.RectorR. S. (2018). Prebiotic and probiotic treatment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutr. Rev76, 822–839. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuy031
65
LynchJ. P.GoersL.LesserC. F. (2022). Emerging strategies for engineering Escherichia coli Nissle 1917-based therapeutics. Trends Pharmacol. Sci43, 772–786. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2022.02.002
66
MaChadoA. S.OliveiraJ. R.LelisD. D. F.de PaulaA. M.B.GuimarãesA. L.S.AndradeJ. M.O. (2021). Oral probiotic bifidobacterium longum supplementation improves metabolic parameters and alters the expression of the renin-angiotensin system in obese mice liver. Biol. Res. For Nurs23, 100–108. doi: 10.1177/1099800420942942
67
Mohamad NorM. H.AyobN.MokhtarN. M.Raja AliR. A.TanG. C.WongZ. (2021). The effect of probiotics (MCP® BCMC® Strains) on hepatic steatosis, small intestinal mucosal immune function, and intestinal barrier in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Nutrients13, 3192. doi: 10.3390/nu13093192
68
MoninL.GaffenS. L. (2018). Interleukin 17 family cytokines: signaling mechanisms, biological activities, and therapeutic implications. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol10, a028522. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a028522
69
MoreiraG. V.AraujoL. C.MurataG. M.MatosS. L.CarvalhoC. R.O. (2022). Kombucha tea improves glucose tolerance and reduces hepatic steatosis in obese mice. Biomedicine Pharmacotherapy155, 113660. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2022.113660
70
MouzakiM.AllardJ. P. (2012). The role of nutrients in the development, progression, and treatment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J. Clin. Gastroenterol46, 457–467. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e31824cf51e
71
MuJ.TanF.ZhouX.ZhaoX. (2020). Lactobacillus fermentum CQPC06 in naturally fermented pickles prevents non-alcoholic fatty liver disease by stabilizing the gut–liver axis in mice. Food Funct11, 8707–8723. doi: 10.1039/D0FO01823F
72
NguyenH. T.GuM.WerlingerP.ChoJ. H.ChengJ.SuhJ. W. (2022a). Lactobacillus sakei MJM60958 as a potential probiotic alleviated non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in mice fed a high-fat diet by modulating lipid metabolism, inflammation, and gut microbiota. Int. J. Mol. Sci23, 13436. doi: 10.3390/ijms232113436
73
NguyenH. T.GuM.WerlingerP.ChoJ.-H.ChengJ.SuhJ.-W. (2022b). Lactobacillus sakei MJM60958 as a potential probiotic alleviated non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in mice fed a high-fat diet by modulating lipid metabolism, inflammation, and gut microbiota. Int. J. Mol. Sci23, 13436. doi: 10.3390/ijms232113436
74
NovakE. A.MollenK. P. (2015). Mitochondrial dysfunction in inflammatory bowel disease. Front. Cell Dev. Biol3, 62. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2015.00062
75
O'flahertyS.KlaenhammerT. R. (2010). The role and potential of probiotic bacteria in the gut, and the communication between gut microflora and gut/host. Int. Dairy J20, 262–268. doi: 10.1016/j.idairyj.2009.11.011
76
OhJ.-H.SchuelerK. L.StapletonD. S.AlexanderL. M.YenC.-L. E.KellerM. P. (2020). Secretion of recombinant interleukin-22 by engineered Lactobacillus reuteri reduces fatty liver disease in a mouse model of diet-induced obesity. MSphere5, e00183–e00120. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00183-20
77
PanC.-X.TangJ.WangX.-Y.WuF.-R.GeJ.-F.ChenF.-H. (2014). Role of interleukin-22 in liver diseases. Inflammation Res63, 519–525. doi: 10.1007/s00011-014-0727-3
78
PanX.WenS. W.KamingaA. C.LiuA. (2020). Gut metabolites and inflammation factors in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci. Rep10, 1–11. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-65051-8
79
PantR.SharmaN.KabeerS. W.SharmaS.TikooK. (2022). Selenium-enriched probiotic alleviates western diet-induced non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in rats via modulation of autophagy through AMPK/SIRT-1 pathway. Biol. Trace Element Res201 (3), 1–14. doi: 10.1007/s12011-022-03247-x
80
PascaleA.MarchesiN.MarelliC.CoppolaA.LuziL.GovoniS.et al. (2018). Microbiota and metabolic diseases. Endocrine61, 357–371. doi: 10.1007/s12020-018-1605-5
81
PatnaudeL.MayoM.MarioR.WuX.KnightH.CreamerK.et al. (2021). Mechanisms and regulation of IL-22-mediated intestinal epithelial homeostasis and repair. Life Sci271, 119195. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2021.119195
82
PierantonelliI.Svegliati-BaroniG. (2019). Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: basic pathogenetic mechanisms in the progression from NAFLD to NASH. Transplantation103, e1–e13. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002480
83
RiaziK.AzhariH.CharetteJ. H.UnderwoodF. E.KingJ. A.AfsharE. E.et al. (2022). The prevalence and incidence of NAFLD worldwide: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol7, 851–861. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(22)00165-0
84
RitzeY.Bárdos GClausA.EhrmannV.BergheimI.SchwiertzA. (2014). Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG protects against non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in mice. PloS One9, e80169. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080169
85
RoychowdhuryS.SelvakumarP. C.CresciG. A. (2018). The role of the gut microbiome in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Med. Sci6, 47. doi: 10.3390/medsci6020047
86
SabirinF.LimS. M.NeohC. F.RamasamyK. (2022). Hepatoprotection of probiotics against non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in vivo: a systematic review. . Front. Nutr524, 844374. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.844374
87
SafariZ.GérardP. (2019). The links between the gut microbiome and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Cell Mol. Life Sci76, 1541–1558. doi: 10.1007/s00018-019-03011-w
88
SavcheniukO.KobyliakN.KondroM.VirchenkoO.FalalyeyevaT.BeregovaT. (2014). Short-term periodic consumption of multiprobiotic from childhood improves insulin sensitivity, prevents development of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and adiposity in adult rats with glutamate-induced obesity. BMC complementary Altern. Med14, 1–17. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-14-247
89
Scherz-ShouvalR.ElazarZ. R. O. S. (2007). mitochondria and the regulation of autophagy. Trends Cell Biol17, 422–427. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2007.07.009
90
SchillingerU.LückeF. K. (1989). Antibacterial activity of Lactobacillus sake isolated from meat. Appl. Environ. Microbiol55, 1901–1906. doi: 10.1128/aem.55.8.1901-1906.1989
91
SeoM.InoueI.TanakaM.MatsudaN.NakanoT.AwataT. (2013). Clostridium butyricum MIYAIRI 588 improves high-fat diet-induced non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in rats. Dig Dis. Sci58, 3534–3544. doi: 10.1007/s10620-013-2879-3
92
SepidehA.KarimP.HosseinA.LeilaR.HamdollahM.MohammadG. E. (2016). Effects of multistrain probiotic supplementation on glycemic and inflammatory indices in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a double-blind randomized clinical trial. J. Am. Coll. Nutr35, 500–505. doi: 10.1080/07315724.2015.1031355
93
ShuJ. Z.HuangY. H.HeX. H.LiuF. Y.LiangQ. Q.YongX. T.et al. (2025). Gut microbiota differences, metabolite changes, and disease intervention during metabolic - dysfunction - related fatty liver progression. World J. Hepatol17, 103854. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v17.i3.103854
94
StojsavljevićS.Gomerčić PalčićM.Virović JukićL.Smirčić DuvnjakL.DuvnjakM. (2014). Adipokines and proinflammatory cytokines, the key mediators in the pathogenesis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. World J. Gastroenterol20, 18070–18091. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i48.18070
95
TangY.HuangJ.ZhangW. Y.QinS.YangY. X.RenH. (2019). Effects of probiotics on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ther. Adv. Gastroenterol12, 1756284819878046. doi: 10.1177/1756284819878046
96
Tenorio-JiménezC.Martínez-RamírezM. J.Tercero-LozanoM.Arraiza-IrigoyenC.Del Castillo-CodesI.OlzaJ.et al. (2018). Evaluation of the effect of Lactobacillus reuteri V3401 on biomarkers of inflammation, cardiovascular risk and liver steatosis in obese adults with metabolic syndrome: a randomized clinical trial (PROSIR). BMC Complement Altern. Med18, 306. doi: 10.1186/s12906-018-2371-x
97
UnderwoodM. A.GermanJ. B.LebrillaC. B.MillsD. A. (2015). Bifidobacterium longum subspecies infantis: champion colonizer of the infant gut. Pediatr. Res77, 229–235. doi: 10.1038/pr.2014.156
98
VakhrushevY. M.LukashevichA. P.LyapinaM. V. (2022). The study of abdominal and parietal enteric microbiota in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Ter Arkh94, 188–193. doi: 10.26442/00403660.2022.02.201369
99
WangY.FangZ.ZhaiQ.CuiS.ZhaoJ.ZhangH.et al. (2021). Supernatants of bifidobacterium longum and lactobacillusplantarum strains exhibited antioxidative effects on A7R5 cells. Microorganisms9, 452. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9020452
100
WangW.LiQ.ChaiW.SunC.ZhangT.ZhaoC. (2019). Lactobacillus paracasei Jlus66 extenuate oxidative stress and inflammation via regulation of intestinal flora in rats with non alcoholic fatty liver disease. Food Sci. Nutr7, 2636–2646. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.1118
101
WangY.NakajimaT.GonzalezF. J.TanakaN. (2020). PPARs as metabolic regulators in the liver: lessons from liver-specific PPAR-null mice. Int. J. Mol. Sci21, 2061. doi: 10.3390/ijms21062061
102
WangW.XuA.-L.LiZ.-C.LiY.XuS. F.SangH. C. (2020). Combination of probiotics and Salvia miltiorrhiza polysaccharide alleviates hepatic steatosis via gut microbiota modulation and insulin resistance improvement in high fat-induced NAFLD mice. Diabetes Metab. J44, 336–348. doi: 10.4093/dmj.2019.0042
103
WangC. H.YenH. R.LuW. L.HoH. H.LinW. Y.KuoY. W.et al. (2022). Adjuvant Probiotics of Lactobacillus salivarius subsp. salicinius AP-32, L. johnsonii MH-68, and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis CP-9 Attenuate Glycemic Levels and Inflammatory Cytokines in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus. Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne)13, 754401. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.754401
104
WilliamsC. D.StengelJ.AsikeM. I.TorresD. M.ShawJ.ContrerasM. (2011). Prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis among a largely middle−aged population utilizing ultrasound and liver biopsy: a prospective study. Gastroenterology140 (1), 124–31. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.09.038
105
XiaoM.-W.LinS.-X.ShenZ.-H.LuoW.-W.WangX.-Y. (2019). Systematic review with meta-analysis: the effects of probiotics in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. . Gastroenterol. Res. Pract2019. doi: 10.1155/2019/1484598
106
XuR.-Y.WanY.-P.FangQ.-Y.LuQ.-Y.CaiW.W. (2011). Supplementation with probiotics modifies gut flora and attenuates liver fat accumulation in rat nonalcoholic fatty liver disease model. J. Clin. Biochem. Nutr50 (1), 1108190104. doi: 10.3164/jcbn.11-38
107
YanY.LiuC.ZhaoS.WangX.WangJ.ZhangH. (2020). Probiotic Bifidobacterium lactis V9 attenuates hepatic steatosis and inflammation in rats with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. AMB Express10, 1–11. doi: 10.1186/s13568-020-01038-y
108
YangR.ShangJ.ZhouY.LiuW.TianY.ShangH. (2021). Effects of probiotics on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Expert Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol15, 1401–1409. doi: 10.1080/17474124.2022.2016391
109
YaoS.ZhaoZ.WangW.LiuX. (2021). Bifidobacterium longum: protection against inflammatory bowel disease. J. Immunol. Res2021, 8030297. doi: 10.1155/2021/8030297
110
YeH.LiQ.ZhangZ.SunM.ZhaoC.ZhangT. (2017). Effect of a novel potential probiotic Lactobacillus paracasei Jlus66 isolated from fermented milk on nonalcoholic fatty liver in rats. Food Funct8, 4539–4546. doi: 10.1039/C7FO01108C
111
YounossiZ. M.GolabiP.PaikJ. M.HenryA.Van DongenC.HenryL. (2023). The global epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH): a systematic review. Hepatology77, 1335–1347. doi: 10.1097/HEP.0000000000000004
112
YuJ. S.YounG. S.ChoiJ.KimC.-H.KimB. Y.YangS.-J. (2021). Lactobacillus lactis and Pediococcus pentosaceus-driven reprogramming of gut microbiome and metabolome ameliorates the progression of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Clin. Transl. Med11, e634. doi: 10.1002/ctm2.634
113
ZeigererA. (2021). NAFLD - A rising metabolic disease. Mol. Metab50, 101274. doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2021.101274
114
ZenewiczL. A. (2018). IL-22: there is a gap in our knowledge. Immunohorizons2, 198–207. doi: 10.4049/immunohorizons.1800006
115
ZhangH.BernuzziF.LleoA.MaX.InvernizziP. (2015). Therapeutic potential of IL-17-mediated signaling pathway in autoimmune liver diseases. Mediators Inflamm2015, 436450. doi: 10.1155/2015/436450
116
ZhouJ.LiM.ChenQ.LiX.ChenL.DongZ.et al. (2022). Programmable probiotics modulate inflammation and gut microbiota for inflammatory bowel disease treatment after effective oral delivery. Nat. Commun13, 3432. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31171-0
117
ZhuL.LiaoR.HuangJ.XiaoC.YangY.WangH.et al. (2022). Lactobacillus salivarius SNK-6 Regulates Liver Lipid Metabolism Partly via the miR-130a-5p/MBOAT2 Pathway in a NAFLD Model of Laying Hens. Cells11, 4133. doi: 10.3390/cells11244133
118
ZhuJ.ZhouM.ZhaoX.MuM.ChengM. (2018). Blueberry, combined with probiotics, alleviates non-alcoholic fatty liver disease via IL-22-mediated JAK1/STAT3/BAX signaling. Food Funct9, 6298–6306. doi: 10.1039/C8FO01227J
Summary
Keywords
probiotic, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, application, mediating mechanism, future perspective
Citation
Luo X-Y, Huang W-B, Lu C-H, Gu W, Feng Z-X, Shen S, Chen M-Z, Zheng S-S and Yang Z (2025) Application of probiotic therapy in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: mediating mechanism and future perspective. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 15:1638372. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1638372
Received
30 May 2025
Accepted
12 August 2025
Published
15 September 2025
Volume
15 - 2025
Edited by
Ren-Lei Ji, Harvard Medical School, United States
Reviewed by
Lan Huang, Suzhou Municipal Hospital, China
Xuesi Chen, The Affiliated People’s Hospital of Ningbo University, China
Updates
Copyright
© 2025 Luo, Huang, Lu, Gu, Feng, Shen, Chen, Zheng and Yang.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Zhe Yang, yangzhe_0201730@163.com; Shu-Sen Zheng, shusenzheng@zju.edu.cn
†These authors have contributed equally to this work
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.