Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.

Sec. Clinical and Diagnostic Microbiology and Immunology

Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1639148

The Diagnostic Value of RNA-mNGS and DNA-mNGS in Differentiating Bacterial Infection from Colonization in the Lower Respiratory Tract

Provisionally accepted
Yuanfang  DUANYuanfang DUAN1Qin  LIQin LI2Hai'tao  FEIHai'tao FEI2Jiafu  SONGJiafu SONG1*Caiyun  XUCaiyun XU1*
  • 1Lianyungang No 1 People's Hospital, Lianyungang, China
  • 2The First People’s Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Objective: Our study aimed to compare the differential diagnostic value of sequencing reads and the relative abundance of bacteria detected by RNA-mNGS versus DNA-mNGS in distinguishing between bacterial infection and colonization in the lower respiratory tract. Methods: The hospitalized patients with suspected lower respiratory tract infections who had completed RNA-mNGS and DNA-mNGS testing at our hospital from January 2021 to December 2023 were reviewed and divided into two groups: the infected group and the colonized group, based on their final diagnoses. Results: A total of 69 eligible patients were enrolled, with 85 detections of the four target bacterial species (Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Corynebacterium striatum) identified: 46 in infected patients and 39 in colonized patients. The number of sequencing reads and relative abundance of bacterial RNA and DNA in the pathogenic bacteria were significantly higher than those in the non-pathogenic bacteria (all P-values <0.01). ROC curves were used to evaluate the performance of the sequencing reads and relative abundance of bacterial species in predicting the responsible pathogens. The AUC value for RNA relative abundance was the highest at 0.991 (95% CI: 0.977-1.000, P < 0.001), with a cutoff value of 26.28%, a sensitivity of 0.957, and a specificity of 0.974. In the DNA-mNGS results, the AUC value for the ratio of the sequencing reads between the first and the second ranked bacterial sequences in predicting bacterial infection was [0.835 (95% CI: 0.742-0.928), P < 0.001], and the AUC value for the ratio of relative abundance in predicting bacterial infection was [0.839 (95% CI: 0.749-0.929), P < 0.001) ], both having a cutoff value of 47.26, a sensitivity of 0.644 and a specificity of 0.929. Conclusions: Bacterial relative abundance and sequencing reads can serve as indicators to distinguish between infection and colonization, and the relative abundance based on RNA-mNGS exhibits the best differential diagnostic performance; when DNA-mNGS results stand alone, the relative abundance of the detected bacteria and the ratio of relative abundance between the first-ranked and the second-ranked detected bacteria can be utilized for a comprehensive assessment of infection versus colonization.

Keywords: RNA-mNGS, DNA-mNGS, sequencing reads, Relative abundance, lower respiratory tract bacterial infection

Received: 01 Jun 2025; Accepted: 18 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 DUAN, LI, FEI, SONG and XU. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Jiafu SONG, Lianyungang No 1 People's Hospital, Lianyungang, China
Caiyun XU, Lianyungang No 1 People's Hospital, Lianyungang, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.