Abstract
The neonatal period is a critical stage for microbial colonization and immune system development, with dynamic changes in the microbiome closely linked to the pathogenesis of various diseases. Traditional microbiological testing methods have low sensitivity and time-consuming limitations compared to metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS), which makes it difficult to meet the diagnostic and therapeutic needs of critically ill neonates. mNGS analyzes the total DNA in a sample without bias, allowing comprehensive identification of bacteria, viruses, fungi, and parasites, and resolution of functional genes, providing new avenues for precision diagnosis and treatment of diseases such as neonatal sepsis, necrotizing enterocolitis, neonatal pneumonia, neonatal meningitis, neonatal jaundice, and other diseases. However, challenges remain, including the need to optimize sample processing workflows and develop portable devices to enhance clinical conversion potential. In this review, we summarize the application, efficacy, and limitations of mNGS in neonatal diseases. This approach paves the way for novel avenues in mechanistic research, early diagnosis, and personalized therapy for these conditions.
1 Introduction
The neonatal period represents the most vulnerable phase of life and a critical window for microbial colonization and immune system maturation (). The composition and dynamics of the neonatal microbiome (encompassing bacteria, viruses, fungi, and parasites) profoundly influence health (). Beyond roles in nutrient metabolism, immune development, and intestinal barrier formation, microbial dysbiosis is intricately associated with the onset and progression of neonatal diseases (). Preterm and low-birth-weight infants (), with immature immune and metabolic systems, are particularly susceptible to microbiome perturbations, leading to heightened disease risks (). Traditional microbial detection methods, like culture-based techniques, widely used clinically, can be limiting: a. only culturable microbes (≤20% of total microbiota) can be detected; b. prolonged processing times (days to weeks) delay critical diagnoses; c. low sensitivity and specificity, especially in low-biomass samples like blood or cerebrospinal fluid, increasing false-negative rates (). Thus, there is an urgent need for rapid and accurate microbial detection technologies.
Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) enables unbiased analysis of the full genetic information of microbial communities allowing not only the identification of bacteria, viruses, fungi and parasites, but also the resolution of functional genes of microorganisms like antibiotic resistance genes and virulence factors (). A retrospective study that included 1493 mNGS samples (including blood, cerebrospinal fluid, and alveolar lavage fluid) from pediatric patients found a higher rate of mNGS positivity compared to conventional microbiological cultures, especially in patients with sepsis who were younger than 6 years of age or in an immunosuppressed state (). Another systematic evaluation (n=462) comprising 5 studies found that mNGS improved the identification of the etiology of neonatal and pediatric sepsis, particularly in negative cultures and in the identification of abnormal microorganisms (bacteria, viruses, fungi and parasites that are difficult to grow in culture) (). In addition, mNGS provides a scientific basis for microbiome interventions, like probiotics and fecal microbiota transplantation, and opens new avenues for the prevention and treatment of neonatal diseases ().
At present, systematic reviews on the application of mNGS in neonatal diseases are still scarce. This manuscript is the first to comprehensively sort out its application in various diseases. Therefore, the aim of this review is to describe the potential applications and challenges of mNGS in neonatal diseases from the perspective of neonatal microbiome influencing the development of diseases, to provide clinicians and researchers with certain references to mNGS.
2 Metagenomic next-generation sequencing overview
mNGS is a microbiome analysis method based on high-throughput sequencing technology, the core idea of which is to directly extract the total DNA (including microbial and host DNA) from the sample, sequence the DNA fragments by high-throughput sequencing platforms, e.g., Illumina (Illumina; San Diego, California, USA), Pacific Biosciences (PacBio, Menlo Park, California, USA), and Oxford Nanopore Technologies (Oxford Nanopore; Oxford, England, UK). And finally interpret the sequencing data by bioinformatics analytical tools (Figure 1).
Figure 1
2.1 Sample processing and DNA extraction
The first step in mNGS is sample collection and processing. For neonatal studies, common sample types include faces (gut microbiome), blood (sepsis pathogen detection), respiratory secretions (respiratory infections) and skin swabs (skin microbiome). As neonatal sample sizes are usually small and the percentage of host DNA is high, up to 99% of human DNA in blood samples, experimental procedures need to be optimized during DNA extraction to reduce host DNA interference and increase the yield of microbial DNA. Commonly used methods include lysis of cells using chemicals or osmotic lysates prior to extraction, followed by degradation such as enzymes to release the human genome content, leaving only intact microorganisms () or centrifugation () to reduce the human nucleic acids for the next step of analysis. To enrich microbial DNA from human oral samples, various host DNA depletion methods show markedly different efficacy: lyPMA treatment (8.53 ± 2.08% human reads), QIAmp kit (29.17 ± 5.04%), and Molysis™ Basic (62.88 ± 3.46%) significantly reduced the proportion of human reads compared to untreated samples (89.29 ± 0.61%). In contrast, the NEBNext@ kit (90.83 ± 0.77%) showed no significant effect (). Other effective approaches include: selective separation of methylated host DNA using methyl-CpG-binding domains (50-fold reduction in human reads) () and CRISPR-Cas9-mediated depletion of high-abundance sequences (>99% reduction in mitochondrial rRNA in Eukaryotic samples) ().
2.2 High-throughput sequencing
After the extracted DNA is fragmented, high-throughput sequencing is performed by constructing libraries like short-read-long sequencing libraries from Illumina or long-read-long sequencing libraries from Nanopore). Currently, commonly used sequencing platforms include: 1) Illumina: short-read long sequencing (150–300 bp), with high accuracy and high throughput, suitable for large-scale microbiome research; 2) NextSeq (Illumina; San Diego, California, USA): a mainstream sequencing platform for clinical pathogen detection due to its medium throughput and short sequencing time (12–30 hours per run) (); 3) Ion Torrent (Thermo Fisher Scientific; Waltham, Massachusetts, USA): detects H+ released at each dNTP integration, with outputs ranging from ∼50 megabyte to 15 gigabyte per chip, and run times ranging from 2 to 7 hours (); 4) Single-molecule real-time sequencing (SMRT; Pacific Biosciences, Menlo Park, California, USA): average read length is 10-20 kilobyte and can achieve 160 gigabyte of data output in 6 hours (); 5) Nanopore sequencing (Oxford Nanopore Technologies; Oxford, England, UK): produces long reads >200 kilobyte, allows real-time analysis of sequencing data, and can identify pathogens in 6 hours ().
2.3 Bioinformatics analysis
Before species annotation and functional analysis, the raw data undergoes quality control, like removal of low-quality reads and host DNA sequences. Commonly used bioinformatics tools include: a. species annotation: Kraken2 (), MetaPhlAn (), Centrifuge (). And other tools classify microorganisms by comparing reference databases, like NCBI (), Greengenes (); b. functional analysis: HUMAnN2 (), MG-RAST (), and other tools predict microbial functional genes by comparing functional databases, like KEGG, COG, to predict the functional genes of microorganisms; c. Resistance gene analysis: databases such as CARD () and ARG-ANNOT () were used to identify antibiotic resistance genes. The rigorous application of appropriate statistical methodologies constitutes a critical component of bioinformatics workflows, ensuring robust inference and reproducible biological discovery.
3 Standardized clinical implementation protocol for mNGS in neonatal diseases
3.1 Workflow and clinical application of mNGS
The clinial utility of mNGS in neonatal infection management has been validated by multiple international/domestic studies. According to the latest expert consensus, we summarize key elements below in Figure 2 () and Table 1 ().
Figure 2
Table 1
| Sample type | Volume | Collection tube | Storage conditions | Transport conditions | Turnaround time (TAT)* |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Venous Blood | 1-3mL (min:0.5mL) | K2EDTA/Streck Cell-Free DNA Tubes | 6~35°C | 6~35°C | 24-48h |
| Cerebrospinal Fluid | 1mL (min:600μL) | Sterile Cryovials | DNA:-20°C (1 week), -80°C (long-term) RNA:-80°C only Avoid freeze-thaw cycles | Dry ice | 24-48h |
| Pleural/Peritoneal Fluid | ≧5ml | 24-48h | |||
| Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid | ≧3ml | 48h | |||
| Sputum | ≧3ml | 48h | |||
| Throat Swab | 24-48h |
Specimen collection precautions (
*: TAT is defined as the interval from sample receipt to report issuance. Significant inter-laboratory variation exists in TAT benchmarks.
3.2 Ethical considerations
Given the ethical sensitivity of mNGS testing, clinical implementation is strictly reserved for cases meeting all criteria: 1. Negative conventional cultures with high clinical suspicion of infection, b. Anticipated results carrying critical therapeutic implications. Prior to initiation, attending physicians must provide legal guardians with detailed explanations: a. Purpose, scope, performing laboratory credentials, and costs; b. Potential false-negative/false-positive results due to biological sample variability and technical limitations; c. Performing laboratories’ assumption of full responsibility for diagnostic accuracy and resultant medical consequences. Specimen collection proceeds only after obtaining written informed consent. This protocol strikes a balance between adopting novel diagnostic technologies and protecting patient rights, providing a standardized framework for implementing mNGS in clinical practice (Appendix 1: informed Consent Template).
4 Metagenomic next-generation sequencing in the study of neonatal diseases
Current evidence indicates limited mNGS use in neonatal disease. We therefore systematically classified common indications, assessed study quality with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and summarized findings in Tables 2 (
Table 2
| Author | Article type | Selection | Selection of the non -exposed cohort | Ascertainment of exposure | Demonstration that outcome of interest was not present at start of study | Comparability | Outcome | Was follow-up long enough for outcomes to occur | Adequacy of follow up of cohorts | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Representativeness of the exposed cohort | Comparability of cohorts on the basis of the design or analysis | Assessment of outcome | ||||||||
| retrospective study | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | 5 | ||||
| prospective study | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★★ | ★ | 7 | |||
| prospective study | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★★ | ★ | 7 | |||
| prospective study | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | 5 | ||||
| retrospective study | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | 5 | ||||
| prospective study | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | 5 | ||||
| prospective study | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | 5 | ||||
| prospective study | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★★ | ★ | ★ | 7 | |||
| prospective study | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★★ | ★ | ★ | 7 | |||
| prospective study | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | 6 | |||
| prospective study | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | 5 |
The assessment of studies with Newcastle–Ottawa quality assessment scale.
Table 3
| Author | Sample size | Study population | Inclusion criteria | Primary outcome | Confounding factors | Sequencing platform | Sequencing depth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blood (n=615) CSF(n=576) BALF(n=196) Sputum (n=86) | n=1473 | from patients with suspected or diagnosed sepsis, CNS infection, or lower respiratory tract infection; from patients aged 0 to 18 years; from blood, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, CSF, or sputum; ested by mNGS and culture with or without other CMT within 3 days using the same sample type. | Microbial composition, abundance | NR | Illumina NextSeq 550 | ≧ 20M | |
| faeces (n=399) | n=55 | preterm infants with BW<1500g; survival in the first three weeks of life | Microbial composition, abundance, and functional traits | Whether bigidobacterium and gentamicin are administered, the feeding plan (formula milk, breast milk, mixed feeding), and the hospital location | Illumina MiSeq | NR | |
| faeces (n=644) | n=77 | born at <32 weeks of gestation | Microbial composition, abundance | GA, whether antibiotics and probiotics are received | Illumina HiSeq X Ten | NR | |
| Blood (n=146) CSF(n=69) BALF(n=237) Sputum (n=62)Tissue (n=58)and others* | n=519 | Suspected infected | Microbial composition, abundance | NR | Illumina Nextseq CN500 | NR | |
| Blood (n=45) | n=45 | GA <37weeks, survival time >3days; suspected sepsis based on clinical symtoms | Microbial composition, abundance | NR | NR | NR | |
| Blood(n=43) CSF(n=101) | n=88 | Clinically stable newborn with suspected central nervous system infecion | Microbial composition, abundance, and functional traits | NR | Illumina NovaSeq | NR | |
| faeces (n=70) | n=70 | direct bilirubin in serum >17.1 μmol/L; TBIL<85.5 μmol/L or TBIL > 85.5 μmol/L with DBIL/TBIL >20%; aged 1–5 months old; no recorded use of antibiotics; presenting with skin or sclera jaundice | Microbial composition, abundance | NR | Illumina Hiseq2500 | 5700-7000x | |
| faeces (n=133) | n=25 | Exclusively breast fed With a BW of 2500 to 4000 grams GA of 37 to 42 weeks a fifth-minute Apgar score of 8 to 10 | Microbial composition, abundance, and functional traits | age, gender, BW, height | Illumina MiSeq | NR | |
| faeces (n=NR) | n=13 | Newborns diagnosed with congenital heart disease Full-term newborns Or those schedule to undergo cardiopulmonary bypass surgery within 4 weeks after birth | Microbial composition, abundance | age, gender, BW | Illumina NextSeq | 14000x | |
| faeces (n=68) | n=17 | at the age of zero during recruitment; who will be residing within the Mangaung metropolitan region during the study; with or without clinical symptoms | Microbial composition, abundance, and functional traits | NR | Illumina MiSeq | NR | |
| Blood (n=153) CSF(n=127) BALF(n=39) Sputum (n=10) Respiratory secretion(n=2) | n=168 | hospitalized from January 1, 2020 to June 30, 2021 suspected of having infections in the central nervous system, bloodstream, respiratory tract, intestinal system or urinary system | Microbial composition, abundance | NR | Illumina NextSeq 550 | 4000–5000× |
Summary of mNGS applications in neonatal diseases.
*others means hydrothorax(n=17), ascites(n=18), pericardial effusion(n=7), nose/mouth swab (n=5), secreta(n=3), pus(n=13), others(n=5).
CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; BALF, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid; CNS, central nervous system; mNGS, metagenomic next-generation sequencing; CMT, conventional microbial testing; NR, not reported; BW, birth weight; GA, gestational age.
4.1 Necrotizing enterocolitis
The gut microbiome of children with NEC shows instability before disease onset and is associated with specific bacterial species. For example, a study (
In summary, mNGS plays an important role in studying the relationship between neonatal gut injury and the gut microbiome. Using mNGS, researchers have been able to identify compositional and functional changes in the neonatal gut microbiome that are associated with the development of neonatal gut injury. Future studies could further use mNGS to explore the dynamics of the neonatal gut microbiome and develop new diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.
4.2 Neonatal infectious diseases
4.2.1 Neonatal sepsis
Sepsis is a common condition in neonatal intensive care units. Conventional culture methods demonstrate limited efficacy in pathogen detection for suspected infections: a majority of samples (>50%) fail to yield potential pathogens indicating substantial presence of non-cultivable organisms, These necessitates molecular techniques to establish definitive etiology (
4.2.2 Infection-associated neonatal pneumonia
Infection-associated neonatal pneumonia is a leading cause of neonatal mortality, and timely and accurate identification of the pathogen is essential to improve survival in critically ill patients, where delayed or inadequate antimicrobial therapy can lead to poor outcomes. For example, mNGS has a higher positive pathogen detection rate in clinical samples of lower respiratory tract infections than conventional pathogen testing (91.70% vs. 37.60%), and its rapid detection time and reduced sensitivity to the effects of antimicrobial drug use make mNGS a valuable adjunct to diagnostic and therapeutic decision-making for suspected lower respiratory tract infections in clinical settings (
4.2.3 Infection-associated neonatal meningitis
Neonatal infection-associated meningitis is most caused by bacteria or viruses and has an atypical clinical presentation. Early diagnosis relies on CSF culture, but the positive rate is low. The use of mNGS to assist in the diagnosis of pathogens may help in early etiological diagnosis. For example, several (
4.2.4 Congenital tuberculosis
According to a 2018 World Health Organization report, around 10,000 newborns worldwide are infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis, with women and children under the age of 15 accounting for 32% and 11% of tuberculosis cases, respectively (
In summary, mNGS offers distinct advantages for severe neonatal infections: it rapidly detects broad pathogen gene spectra simultaneously, remains unaffected by prior antimicrobial exposure, and addresses limitations of conventional diagnostics in complex cases. Low microbial biomass samples (e.g., blood) are prone to false-positive results due to amplification of cell-free microbial DNA translocated across mucosal barriers (
4.3 Neonatal jaundice
Neonatal jaundice is a common condition that occurs mostly in the first week of life, with a prevalence of up to 80 per cent in preterm infants (
Current studies exhibit four key limitations: systematic omission of RNA sequencing compromises viral pathogen coverage; clinically indicated enrollment introduces selection bias; short follow-up obscures long-term outcomes; and multifactorial confounders in early microbiota interventions impede causal attribution. We propose establishing multicenter, large-scale cohorts with extended follow-up to validate mNGS clinical utility in neonatal diseases.
5 Discussion
Normally, the fetus develops in a sterile uterus. However, due to a variety of factors, preterm infants must continue to develop in the neonatal intensive care unit for part of the postnatal period, and this environmental change results in the infants being prematurely colonized by microorganisms during critical developmental transitions and affecting the infant’s immune system (
Compared to conventional 16S rRNA sequencing [Table 4 (
Table 4
| Items | mNGS | 16S rRNA sequencing |
|---|---|---|
| Principles | Total microbial DNA from environmental samples was mechanivally fragmented, ligated with universal adapters, PCR-amplified, and sequenced. Resulting short reads were then assembled into contgs for subsequent analysis | Amplicon sequencing targeting hypervariable regions (e.g., V3-V40 of the 16S rRNA gene, following PCR amplification with universal primers |
| Scope | This approach provids comprehensive coverage of microbial genomes within the sample, encompassing bacteria, fungi, viruses, and other microbial domains | mainly targeting bacteria and archaea |
| Species identification | Ability to identify microorganisms down to the species or even strain level | Often only identified to genus or species level, and in some cases with limited accuracy at species level |
| Volume of data and complexity of analysis | Large volume of data and complex bioinformatics analyses | Relatively small amount of data and simple to analyse |
| Cost and time | Higher cost and longer time | Lower cost and shorter time |
| Fields of application | Applicable for comprehensive profiling of microbial community composition and function, including environmental microbiology and clinical diagnostics | Routinely employed for composition and diversity analysis of microbial communities in fields such as microbial ecology and environmental science |
Comparison between mNGS and 16S rRNA sequencing (
However, there are still many challenges to the application of mNGS in the neonatal setting. Neonatal sample sizes are typically small and have a high percentage of host DNA, which can affect the depth of sequencing and analysis of microbial DNA. To overcome this problem, researchers have developed a variety of techniques to remove host DNA, such as selective lysis of host cells and digestion of host DNA using host DNA enzymes, as well as optimized sample processing methods like microbial DNA enrichment, and library construction methods such as whole genome amplification. In addition, the resulting data volumes are huge, typically tens of gigabytes. And data analysis involves multiple steps such as quality control, species annotation and functional analysis, requiring sophisticated bioinformatics tools and expertise. Interpretation of microbiome data needs to consider host factors such as age, diet and antibiotic use. And early interpretation of neonates as a group in particular places greater demands on researchers. Furthermore, unresolved challenges persist regarding cost-effectiveness and data privacy in neonatal genomics. Crucially, the current evidence base for mNGS across disease spectra lacks robust validation through large-scale prospective trials, Future multicenter prospective studies are imperative to address this critical evidence gap.
There have been several studies looking at how to improve the efficacy of mNGS. For example, in terms of sample type selection, a 2-year retrospective cohort study in pediatric settings found no significant increase in efficacy or antimicrobial duration when plasma was chosen as the sample for testing compared to blood samples. This study found that mNGS in plasma was more useful in patients with immunodeficiency, but less valuable than expected in patients with endocarditis (
6 Conclusion
mNGS has shown promising applications in the early diagnosis of neonatal severe infections, individualized treatment guidance, and inherited metabolic diseases. Although cost-effectiveness and standardization still need to be explored, with the accumulation of technology iteration and clinical validation, mNGS is expected to become a core tool for the early diagnosis, precise treatment, and prognosis assessment of neonatal severe infections, with considerable potential for clinical application in the long term.
Statements
Author contributions
FH: Software, Writing – original draft, Methodology, Data curation, Validation, Visualization, Investigation, Resources, Funding acquisition, Formal Analysis, Supervision, Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing, Project administration. JL: Methodology, Visualization, Writing – review & editing, Investigation, Supervision, Formal Analysis, Writing – original draft, Software. DL: Data curation, Visualization, Software, Investigation, Conceptualization, Resources, Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Formal Analysis. YL: Project administration, Formal Analysis, Resources, Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing. JT: Formal Analysis, Project administration, Data curation, Visualization, Resources, Writing – review & editing, Validation, Methodology, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Investigation.
Funding
The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82171710), Sichuan Natural Science Foundation Project (Surface project) (Project number: 2025ZNSFSC0639) and National Key Research and Development Program (Grant No. 2024YFC2707705).
Acknowledgments
We thank BioRender.com for providing tools to create scientific figures.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The authors declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
Agudelo-PérezS.Fernández-SarmientoJ.Rivera LeónD.PeláezR. G. (2023). Metagenomics by next-generation sequencing (mNGS) in the etiological characterization of neonatal and pediatric sepsis: A systematic review. Front. Pediatr.11, 1011723. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1011723
2
BaillieV. L.MadhiS. A.AhyongV.OlwagenC. P. (2023). Metagenomic sequencing of post-mortem tissue samples for the identification of pathogens associated with neonatal deaths. Nat. Commun.14, 5373. doi:Â 10.1038/s41467-023-40958-8
3
Blanco-MÃguezA.BeghiniF.CumboF.McIverL. J.ThompsonK. N.ZolfoM.et al. (2023). Extending and improving metagenomic taxonomic profiling with uncharacterized species using MetaPhlAn 4. Nat. Biotechnol.41, 1633–1644. doi: 10.1038/s41587-023-01688-w
4
BlauwkampT. A.ThairS.RosenM. J.BlairL.LindnerM. S.VilfanI. D.et al. (2019). Analytical and clinical validation of a microbial cell-free DNA sequencing test for infectious disease. Nat. Microbiol.4, 663–674. doi: 10.1038/s41564-018-0349-6
5
CamachoC.CoulourisG.AvagyanV.MaN.PapadopoulosJ.BealerK.et al. (2009). BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinf.10, 421. doi:Â 10.1186/1471-2105-10-421
6
CassirN.BenamarS.La ScolaB. (2016). Clostridium butyricum: from beneficial to a new emerging pathogen. Clin. Microbiol. Infect.22, 37–45. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2015.10.014
7
CharalampousT.KayG. L.RichardsonH.AydinA.BaldanR.JeanesC.et al. (2019). Nanopore metagenomics enables rapid clinical diagnosis of bacterial lower respiratory infection. Nat. Biotechnol.37, 783–792. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0156-5
8
CheG.LiuF.ChangL.LaiS.TengJ.YangQ.et al. (2023). Mycoplasma hominis meningitis diagnosed by metagenomic next-generation sequencing in a preterm newborn: a case report and literature review. Lab. Med.54, e24–e28. doi: 10.1093/labmed/lmac078
9
ChenX.WangH.LiQ.QiY.LiF.HeW.et al. (2023). A fatal case of neonatal viral sepsis caused by human parainfluenza virus type 3. Virol. J.20, 248. doi:Â 10.1186/s12985-023-02141-9
10
ChenH.YinY.GaoH.GuoY.DongZ.WangX.et al. (2020). Clinical utility of in-house metagenomic next-generation sequencing for the diagnosis of lower respiratory tract infections and analysis of the host immune response. Clin. Infect. Dis.71, S416–s426. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1516
11
ChenL.ZhaoY.WeiJ.HuangW.MaY.YangX.et al. (2022). Metagenomic next-generation sequencing for the diagnosis of neonatal infectious diseases. Microbiol. Spectr.10, e0119522. doi:Â 10.1128/spectrum.01195-22
12
ChenH.ZhengY.ZhangX.LiuS.YinY.GuoY.et al. (2024). Clinical evaluation of cell-free and cellular metagenomic next-generation sequencing of infected body fluids. J. Adv. Res.55, 119–129. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2023.02.018
13
ClaudE. C.KeeganK. P.BrulcJ. M.LuL.BartelsD.GlassE.et al. (2013). Bacterial community structure and functional contributions to emergence of health or necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm infants. Microbiome1, 20. doi:Â 10.1186/2049-2618-1-20
14
Clinical Microbiology Group of Chinese Society of Laboratory Medicine CMGoCSoMaI, Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infection of China International Exchange and Promotion Association for Medical and Healthcare WH. (2021). Chinese expert consensus on metagenomics next-generation sequencing application on pathogen detection of infectious diseases. Chin. J. Lab. Med. doi:Â 10.3760/cma.j.cn114452-20201026-00794
15
CzeruckaD.DahanS.MograbiB.RossiB.RampalP. (2000). Saccharomyces boulardii preserves the barrier function and modulates the signal transduction pathway induced in enteropathogenic Escherichia coli-infected T84 cells. Infect. Immun.68, 5998–6004. doi: 10.1128/iai.68.10.5998-6004.2000
16
DeSantisT. Z.HugenholtzP.LarsenN.RojasM.BrodieE. L.KellerK.et al. (2006). Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.72, 5069–5072. doi: 10.1128/aem.03006-05
17
DiBartolomeoM. E.ClaudE. C. (2016). The developing microbiome of the preterm infant. Clin. Ther.38, 733–739. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.02.003
18
DingJ.MaX.HanL.ZhaoX.LiA.XinQ.et al. (2021). Gut microbial alterations in neonatal jaundice pre- and post-treatment. Biosci. Rep.41 (4), BSR20210362. doi:Â 10.1042/bsr20210362
19
DuJ.DongS.JiaS.ZhangQ.HeiM. (2021). Clinical characteristics and post-discharge follow-up analyses of 10 infants with congenital tuberculosis: A retrospective observational study. Pediatr. Investig.5, 86–93. doi: 10.1002/ped4.12266
20
FeeheryG. R.YigitE.OyolaS. O.LanghorstB. W.SchmidtV. T.StewartF. J.et al. (2013). A method for selectively enriching microbial DNA from contaminating vertebrate host DNA. PloS One8, e76096. doi:Â 10.1371/journal.pone.0076096
21
FilkinsL. M.BrysonA. L.MillerS. A.MitchellS. L. (2020). Navigating clinical utilization of direct-from-specimen metagenomic pathogen detection: clinical applications, limitations, and testing recommendations. Clin. Chem.66, 1381–1395. doi: 10.1093/clinchem/hvaa183
22
FranzosaE. A.McIverL. J.RahnavardG.ThompsonL. R.SchirmerM.WeingartG.et al. (2018). Species-level functional profiling of metagenomes and metatranscriptomes. Nat. Methods15, 962–968. doi: 10.1038/s41592-018-0176-y
23
FuFHuoWChengYWangWWangJXuFet al. (2024). Clinical characteristics of congenital tuberculosis and application of metagenomics next-generation sequencing technology in diagnosis. Chin. Pediatr. Emergency Med. doi:Â 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4912.2024.05.011
24
GeM.GanM.YanK.XiaoF.YangL.WuB.et al. (2021). Combining metagenomic sequencing with whole exome sequencing to optimize clinical strategies in neonates with a suspected central nervous system infection. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol.11. doi:Â 10.3389/fcimb.2021.671109
25
GoodwinS.McPhersonJ. D.McCombieW. R. (2016). Coming of age: ten years of next-generation sequencing technologies. Nat. Rev. Genet.17, 333–351. doi: 10.1038/nrg.2016.49
26
Grizotte-LakeM.ZhongG.DuncanK.KirkwoodJ.IyerN.SmolenskiI.et al. (2018). Commensals suppress intestinal epithelial cell retinoic acid synthesis to regulate interleukin-22 activity and prevent microbial dysbiosis. Immunity49, 1103–1115.e1106. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.11.018
27
GuptaS. K.PadmanabhanB. R.DieneS. M.Lopez-RojasR.KempfM.LandraudL.et al. (2014). ARG-ANNOT, a new bioinformatic tool to discover antibiotic resistance genes in bacterial genomes. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.58, 212–220. doi: 10.1128/aac.01310-13
28
HansenC. H.MetzdorffS. B.HansenA. K. (2013). Customizing laboratory mice by modifying gut microbiota and host immunity in an early “window of opportunity. Gut Microbes4, 241–245. doi: 10.4161/gmic.23999
29
HooperL. V.WongM. H.ThelinA.HanssonL.FalkP. G.GordonJ. I.et al. (2001). Molecular analysis of commensal host-microbial relationships in the intestine. Science291, 881–884. doi: 10.1126/science.291.5505.881
30
HouC.NorciaA. M.MadanA.GoodW. V. (2014). Visuocortical function in infants with a history of neonatal jaundice. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.55, 6443–6449. doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-14261
31
HuangL.BaoY.XuZ.LeiX.ChenY.ZhangY.et al. (2013). Neonatal bilirubin levels and childhood asthma in the US Collaborative Perinatal Project, 1959-1965. Am. J. Epidemiol.178, 1691–1697. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwt248
32
Infections TFoMN-GSfC (2019). Expert consensus on metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) for critical infections. Chin. J. Emerg. Med.28 (2), 151–155. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0282.2019.02.005
33
JiaQ.TongX. M. (2020). A review on the characteristics of microbiome and their association with diseases in preterm infants. Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi22, 1240–1244. doi: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2005131
34
JohanssonM. E.PhillipsonM.PeterssonJ.VelcichA.HolmL.HanssonG. C.. (2008). The inner of the two Muc2 mucin-dependent mucus layers in colon is devoid of bacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.105, 15064–15069. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0803124105
35
KimD.SongL.BreitwieserF. P.SalzbergS. L. (2016). Centrifuge: rapid and sensitive classification of metagenomic sequences. Genome Res.26, 1721–1729. doi: 10.1101/gr.210641.116
36
La RosaP. S.WarnerB. B.ZhouY.WeinstockG. M.SodergrenE.Hall-MooreC. M.et al. (2014). Patterned progression of bacterial populations in the premature infant gut. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.111, 12522–12527. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1409497111
37
LeeR. A.Al DhaheriF.PollockN. R.SharmaT. S. (2020). Assessment of the clinical utility of plasma metagenomic next-generation sequencing in a pediatric hospital population. J. Clin. Microbiol.58 (), e00419-20. doi:Â 10.1128/jcm.00419-20
38
LewisW. H.TahonG.GeesinkP.SousaD. Z.EttemaT. J. G. (2021). Innovations to culturing the uncultured microbial majority. Nat. Rev. Microbiol.19, 225–240. doi: 10.1038/s41579-020-00458-8
39
LimW. C.HanauerS. B.LiY. C. (2005). Mechanisms of disease: vitamin D and inflammatory bowel disease. Nat. Clin. Pract. Gastroenterol. Hepatol.2, 308–315. doi: 10.1038/ncpgasthep0215
40
LiuY. Z.ZhangR.XieJ. J.GuoQ.ZhanC. X.ChenM. Y.et al. (2024). Two cases of neonatal Legionella pneumonia. Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi26 (9), 986–988. doi: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2405123
41
LouC. Y.LiuY. N.ZhangX.GuoY. Y.ZhangL. (2024). Application of metagenomic next-generation sequencing technology in preterm infants with sepsis following antibiotic use. Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi26, 456–460. doi: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2311079
42
LvT.ZhaoQ.LiuJ.WangS.WuW.MiaoL.et al. (2024). Utilizing metagenomic next-generation sequencing for pathogen detection and diagnosis in lower respiratory tract infections in real-world clinical practice. Infection52, 625–636. doi: 10.1007/s15010-024-02185-1
43
MarotzC. A.SandersJ. G.ZunigaC.ZaramelaL. S.KnightR.ZenglerK.et al. (2018). Improving saliva shotgun metagenomics by chemical host DNA depletion. Microbiome6, 42. doi:Â 10.1186/s40168-018-0426-3
44
MasiA. C.EmbletonN. D.LambC. A.YoungG.GrangerC. L.NajeraJ.et al. (2021). Human milk oligosaccharide DSLNT and gut microbiome in preterm infants predicts necrotising enterocolitis. Gut70, 2273–2282. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-322771
45
McArthurA. G.WaglechnerN.NizamF.YanA.AzadM. A.BaylayA. J.et al. (2013). The comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.57, 3348–3357. doi: 10.1128/aac.00419-13
46
McNameeM. B.CardwellC. R.PattersonC. C. (2012). Neonatal jaundice is associated with a small increase in the risk of childhood type 1 diabetes: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Acta Diabetol.49, 83–87. doi: 10.1007/s00592-011-0326-5
47
MeyerF.PaarmannD.D'SouzaM.OlsonR.GlassE. M.KubalM.et al. (2008). The metagenomics RAST server - a public resource for the automatic phylogenetic and functional analysis of metagenomes. BMC Bioinf.9, 386. doi:Â 10.1186/1471-2105-9-386
48
MogotsiM. T.OgunbayoA. E.O'NeillH. G.NyagaM. M. (2024). High detection frequency of vaccine-associated polioviruses and non-polio enteroviruses in the stools of asymptomatic infants from the Free State Province, South Africa. Microorganisms12 (5), 920. doi:Â 10.3390/microorganisms12050920
49
MorganR. L.PreidisG. A.KashyapP. C.WeizmanA. V.SadeghiradBMcMaster Probiotic, Prebiotic, and Synbiotic Work Group. (2020). Probiotics reduce mortality and morbidity in preterm, low-birth-weight infants: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials. Gastroenterology159, 467–480. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.05.096
50
NeumannC. J.MahnertA.KumpitschC.KiuR.DalbyM. J.KujawskaM.et al. (2023). Clinical NEC prevention practices drive different microbiome profiles and functional responses in the preterm intestine. Nat. Commun.14, 1349. doi:Â 10.1038/s41467-023-36825-1
51
PammiM.HollisterE.NeuJ. (2020). Gut injury and the microbiome in neonates. Clin. Perinatol.47, 369–382. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2020.02.010
52
PatelS. R.XuY.KoenigR. J.HsuC. H. (1997). Effect of glyoxylate on the function of the calcitriol receptor and vitamin D metabolism. Kidney Int.52, 39–44. doi: 10.1038/ki.1997.301
53
PrezzaG.HeckelT.DietrichS.HombergerC.WestermannA. J.VogelJ.. (2020). Improved bacterial RNA-seq by Cas9-based depletion of ribosomal RNA reads. Rna26, 1069–1078. doi: 10.1261/rna.075945.120
54
Rakoff-NahoumS.PaglinoJ.Eslami-VarzanehF.EdbergS.MedzhitovR. (2004). Recognition of commensal microflora by toll-like receptors is required for intestinal homeostasis. Cell118, 229–241. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.07.002
55
RenkH.SchoppmeierU.MüllerJ.KugerV.NeunhoefferF.GilleC.et al. (2024). Oxygenation and intestinal perfusion and its association with perturbations of the early life gut microbiota composition of children with congenital heart disease. Front. Microbiol.15, 1468842. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1468842
56
RennieJ.Burman-RoyS.MurphyM. S (2010). Neonatal jaundice: summary of NICE guidance. Bmj340, c2409. doi:Â 10.1136/bmj.c2409
57
RodriguesA. C.CaraD. C.FretezS. H.CunhaF. Q.VieiraE. C.NicoliJ. R.et al. (2000). Saccharomyces boulardii stimulates sIgA production and the phagocytic system of gnotobiotic mice. J. Appl. Microbiol.89, 404–414. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2000.01128.x
58
SalterS. J.CoxM. J.TurekE. M.CalusS. T.CooksonW. O.MoffattM. F.et al. (2014). Reagent and laboratory contamination can critically impact sequence-based microbiome analyses. BMC Biol.12, 87. doi:Â 10.1186/s12915-014-0087-z
59
SherY.OlmM. R.Raveh-SadkaT.BrownC. T.SherR.FirekB.et al. (2020). Combined analysis of microbial metagenomic and metatranscriptomic sequencing data to assess in situ physiological conditions in the premature infant gut. PloS One15, e0229537. doi:Â 10.1371/journal.pone.0229537
60
StappenbeckT. S.HooperL. V.GordonJ. I. (2002). Developmental regulation of intestinal angiogenesis by indigenous microbes via Paneth cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.99, 15451–15455. doi: 10.1073/pnas.202604299
61
StewartC. J.EmbletonN. D.MarrsE. C.SmithD. P.NelsonA.AbdulkadirB.et al. (2016). Temporal bacterial and metabolic development of the preterm gut reveals specific signatures in health and disease. Microbiome4, 67. doi:Â 10.1186/s40168-016-0216-8
62
TaoY.YanH.LiuY.ZhangF.LuoL.ZhouY.et al. (2022). Diagnostic performance of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in pediatric patients: A retrospective study in a large children’s medical center. Clin. Chem.68, 1031–1041. doi: 10.1093/clinchem/hvac067
63
The Subspecialty Group of Neonatology tSoP, Chinese Medical Associationthe Editorial Board, Chinese Journal of Pediatrics (2022). Expert consensus on the application of metagenomics next−generation sequencing in neonatal infectious diseases. Chin. J. Pediatr.60, 516–521. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112140-20220113-00046
64
ThomasS.PrzesdzingI.MetzkeD.SchmitzJ.RadbruchA.BaumgartD. C.. (2009). Saccharomyces boulardii inhibits lipopolysaccharide-induced activation of human dendritic cells and T cell proliferation. Clin. Exp. Immunol.156, 78–87. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2009.03878.x
65
VinturacheA. E.Gyamfi-BannermanC.HwangJ.MysorekarI. U.JacobssonBPreterm Birth International Collaborative (PREBIC). (2016). Maternal microbiome - A pathway to preterm birth. Semin. Fetal Neonatal Med.21, 94–99. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2016.02.004
66
W. Global tuberculosis report. (2019). Available online at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241565714 (Accessed May 23, 2025).
67
WangY.HoenigJ. D.MalinK. J.QamarS.PetrofE. O.SunJ.et al. (2009). 16S rRNA gene-based analysis of fecal microbiota from preterm infants with and without necrotizing enterocolitis. Isme J.3, 944–954. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2009.37
68
WangQ.WuB.YangD.YangC.JinZ.CaoJ.et al. (2020). Optimal specimen type for accurate diagnosis of infectious peripheral pulmonary lesions by mNGS. BMC Pulm. Med.20, 268. doi:Â 10.1186/s12890-020-01298-1
69
WangL.ZhaP.WangY.KongY.SuY.DaiL.et al. (2022). The value of macrogene second-generation sequencing in the diagnosis, guidance of drug use, and efficacy monitoring of infectious pneumonia in premature infants. Comput. Math Methods Med.2022, 4398614. doi:Â 10.1155/2022/4398614
70
WardD. V.ScholzM.ZolfoM.TaftD. H.SchiblerK. R.TettA.et al. (2016). Metagenomic sequencing with strain-level resolution implicates uropathogenic E. coli in necrotizing enterocolitis and mortality in preterm infants. Cell Rep.14, 2912–2924. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.03.015
71
WarnerB. B.DeychE.ZhouY.Hall-MooreC.WeinstockG. M.SodergrenE.et al. (2016). Gut bacteria dysbiosis and necrotising enterocolitis in very low birthweight infants: a prospective case-control study. Lancet387, 1928–1936. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(16)00081-7
72
Wells GAS. B.O’ConnellD.et al. (2000). The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses (Ottawa Hospital Research Institute). Available online at: https://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp (Accessed July 23, 2025).
73
WestP. T.BrooksE. F.CostalesC.MorenoA.JensenT. D.BudvytieneI.et al. (2022). Near-fatal Legionella pneumonia in a neonate linked to home humidifier by metagenomic next generation sequencing. Med.3, 565–567. doi: 10.1016/j.medj.2022.06.004
74
WoodD. E.LuJ.LangmeadB. (2019). Improved metagenomic analysis with Kraken 2. Genome Biol.20, 257. doi:Â 10.1186/s13059-019-1891-0
75
XiangZ. B.LengE. L.CaoW. F.LiuS. M.ZhouY. L.LuoC. Q.et al. (2023). A systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of metagenomic next-generation sequencing for diagnosing tuberculous meningitis. Front. Immunol.14, 1223675. doi:Â 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1223675
76
XiongY. F.CaiZ.LiS. C.SongY. J.HuX. M.ZhengL.. (2023). Bioinformatics analysis in metagenomic next-generation sequencing of pathogenic microorganisms: current status and challenges. Chin. Med. Assoc. 103 (15), 1098–1102. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20221208-02598
77
YaoW.FengS.YangL.LinY.ZhangM.CaiK.et al. (2023). Differences caused by blood and secretion samples for the detection of Klebsiella pneumoniae using metagenomic next-generation sequencing: A comparative analysis. J. Infect.87, 438–444. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2023.08.011
78
ZhanC.ChenL.HuL. (2021). Neonatal Ureaplasma parvum meningitis complicated with subdural hematoma: a case report and literature review. BMC Infect. Dis.21, 268. doi:Â 10.1186/s12879-021-05968-1
79
ZhangR.ZhuangY.XiaoZ. H.LiC. Y.ZhangF.HuangW. Q.et al. (2022). Diagnosis and surveillance of neonatal infections by metagenomic next-generation sequencing. Front. Microbiol.13, 855988. doi:Â 10.3389/fmicb.2022.855988
80
ZhouS.WangZ.HeF.QiuH.WangY.WangH.et al. (2019). Association of serum bilirubin in newborns affected by jaundice with gut microbiota dysbiosis. J. Nutr. Biochem.63, 54–61. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2018.09.016
81
ZhuY.GanM.GeM.DongX.YanG.ZhouQ.et al. (2023). Diagnostic performance and clinical impact of metagenomic next-generation sequencing for pediatric infectious diseases. J. Clin. Microbiol.61, e0011523. doi:Â 10.1128/jcm.00115-23
82
ZouY. S.CaoZ. L.GuoY.WangB. B.WangJ. L.ChengR.et al. (2024). The application value of metagenomic next-generation sequencing technology in the diagnosis and treatment of neonatal infectious meningitis - a single center retrospective case-control study. Neurol. Res.46, 561–567. doi: 10.1080/01616412.2024.2337523
Summary
Keywords
mNGS, necrotizing enterocolitis, neonatal sepsis, neonatal pneumonia, neonatal meningitis, neonatal jaundice
Citation
Huang F, Li J, Liu D, Li Y and Tang J (2025) Neonatal microbiome dysbiosis decoded by mNGS: from mechanistic insights to precision interventions. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 15:1642072. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1642072
Received
09 June 2025
Accepted
29 July 2025
Published
18 August 2025
Volume
15 - 2025
Edited by
Shi Huang, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
Reviewed by
Larry J. Dishaw, University of South Florida St. Petersburg, United States
Maurizio Sanguinetti, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Italy
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2025 Huang, Li, Liu, Li and Tang.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Jun Tang, tj1234753@sina.com
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.