Finja Rieper1,2
Johannes Wittmann3
Boyke Bunk3
Cathrin Spröer3Melanie Häfner4Christian Willy4
Mathias Müsken5Holger Ziehr1
Imke H.E. Korf1*†
Dieter Jahn2,6*†- 1Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, Fraunhofer Institute for Toxicology and Experimental Medicine (ITEM), Braunschweig, Germany
- 2Institute of Microbiology, Braunschweig University of Technology, Braunschweig, Germany
- 3Leibniz Institute DSMZ-German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures GmbH (DSMZ), Braunschweig, Germany
- 4Department Trauma & Orthopedic Surgery, Septic & Reconstructive Surgery, Research and Treatment Center Septic Defect Wounds, Federal Armed Forces of Germany, Military Academic Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- 5Central Facility for Microscopy, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research (HZI), Braunschweig, Germany
- 6Institute of Microbiology, Braunschweig Center of Systems Biology (BRICS), Braunschweig, Germany
A Correction on
Systematic bacteriophage selection for the lysis of multiple Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains
By Rieper F, Wittmann J, Bunk B, Spröer C, Häfner M, Willy C, Müsken M, Ziehr H, Korf IHE and Jahn D (2025) Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 15:1597009. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1597009
The Conflict of interest statement was erroneously given as “Author XY was employed by Leibniz Institute DSMZ, which is an independent, non-profit research infrastructure.
All authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.”
The correct Conflict of interest statement is “Author BB, CS alnd JW was employed by Leibniz Institute DSMZ, which is an independent, non-profit research infrastructure.
The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.”
The original version of this article has been updated.
In the published article, there was a mistake in the numbers of isolated phages. The number of myoviruses was given as “13” and the number of podoviruses as “eight”.
A correction has been made to the section 3.2 Phage morphology, Line 284:285:
“Using transmission electron microscopy (TEM), the 25 phages were classified as twelve myoviruses including three jumbo phages, four siphoviruses and nine podoviruses (Figure 1)”.
The original version of this article has been updated.
Conflict of interest
Author BB, CS alnd JW was employed by Leibniz Institute DSMZ, which is an independent, non-profit research infrastructure.
The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Keywords: bacteriophages, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, phage susceptibility testing, antibiotic resistance, phage selection
Citation: Rieper F, Wittmann J, Bunk B, Spröer C, Häfner M, Willy C, Müsken M, Ziehr H, Korf IHE and Jahn D (2025) Correction: Systematic bacteriophage selection for the lysis of multiple Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 15:1650832. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1650832
Received: 20 June 2025; Accepted: 11 July 2025;
Published: 20 August 2025.
Approved by:
Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, SwitzerlandCopyright © 2025 Rieper, Wittmann, Bunk, Spröer, Häfner, Willy, Müsken, Ziehr, Korf and Jahn. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Imke H.E. Korf, aW1rZS5rb3JmQGl0ZW0uZnJhdW5ob2Zlci5kZQ==; Dieter Jahn, ZC5qYWhuQHR1LWJzLmRl
†These authors have contributed equally to this work and share last authorship