ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.
Sec. Clinical Infectious Diseases
Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1662518
Pathological subtypes and sampling strategies determine diagnostic sensitivity in cervical lymph node tuberculosis: a retrospective study
Provisionally accepted
- Wuhan Pulmonary Hospital, Wuhan, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Objective To investigate how pathological types and sampling methods affect positivity rates of five diagnostic techniques in cervical lymph node tuberculosis. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 198 surgically confirmed cervical lymph node tuberculosis patients from Wuhan Pulmonary Hospital. Cases were stratified by pathological subtypes and collection methods. The specimens were tested using acid-fast bacillus smear microscopy, mycobacterium tuberculosis culture, quantitative polymerase chain reaction for tuberculosis DNA, simultaneous amplification and testing for tuberculosis, or GeneXpert. Results All 198 cases showed granulomatous inflammation. Liquefactive necrosis occurred in 91.92% (182/198) of cases, with caseous necrosis in 87.88% (174/198), adjacent soft-tissue necrosis in 57.07% (113/198), and suppurative inflammation in 20.20% (40/198). Solid alterations without liquefactive necrosis (coagulative necrosis/non-necrotizing lymphadenitis) comprised 8.08% (16/198). The overall etiological positivity rate was 90.40% (179/198). GeneXpert showed highest sensitivity (90.36%), followed by tuberculosis DNA (74.24%), simultaneous amplification and testing (40.22%), Mycobacterium tuberculosis culture (16.67%), and acid-fast bacillus smear (14.72%). Among 33 culture-positive cases, 32 (96.97%) were GeneXpert positive. Rifampicin resistance detected by GeneXpert was 5.62% (10/178). In specimens with caseous necrosis, soft-tissue necrosis, or liquefactive necrosis, GeneXpert positivity significantly exceeded tuberculosis DNA (all P < 0.01). Liquefactive necrosis samples showed higher positivity than solid-change specimens for all techniques except culture (all P < 0.001). Drainage specimens yielded higher tuberculosis DNA and GeneXpert positivity than surgical resection specimens. Combining surgical and drainage specimens increased culture positivity to 26.09%. Conclusion Etiological positivity rates in cervical lymph node tuberculosis correlate with pathological features. Maximizing liquefactive necrosis sampling for the GeneXpert assay and combining different sampling techniques (such as, surgical resection, incision and drainage, needle biopsy) for etiological detection enhances diagnostic accuracy.
Keywords: Cervical lymph node tuberculosis, Tuberculosis, Etiological diagnosis, Sampling, GeneXpert
Received: 09 Jul 2025; Accepted: 25 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Liu, Wang, Li, Liu, Quan and Dai. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Xiyong Dai, Wuhan Pulmonary Hospital, Wuhan, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.