ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol., 30 September 2025

Sec. Virus and Host

Volume 15 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2025.1668727

Isolation, characterization and therapeutic evaluation of phage HHU1 against K2 Klebsiella pneumoniae

  • 1. Department of Neurosurgery, Zhumadian Central Hospital, Affiliated Central Hospital of Huanghuai University, Zhumadian, China

  • 2. College of Medicine, Huanghuai University, Zhumadian, China

  • 3. College of Biological and Food Engineering, Huanghuai University, Zhumadian, China

Abstract

The prevalence of multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae) poses a severe threat to the global economy and public health, driving a resurgence of interest in phage therapy. Consequently, it is imperative to isolate lytic phages against K. pneumoniae with potent bactericidal activity. This study reports the isolation and characterization of the phage HHU1 against K. pneumoniae from hospital sewage, to evaluate its potential for phage therapy. Phage HHU1 has an icosahedral head and retractable tail, similar to members of the Jedunavirus genus. Host range tests revealed that phage HHU1 obligately lysed K. pneumoniae of the K2 serotype. Genome sequencing analysis showed that the genome of phage HHU1 was 47,779 bp in length, with a GC content of 49.2%, encoding 78 open reading frames, and lacked genes associated with lysogeny and virulence. The rapid adsorption (8 min), short latent period (10 min), and high burst size (approximately 134 PFU/cell) indicate robust replication kinetics of phage HHU1. Phage HHU1 remained stably active even after incubation for 6 h at pH 5.0-10.0 and temperature 4-40°C. In addition, phage HHU1 with different MOIs can completely inhibit the growth of drug-resistant K. pneumoniae within 8 h in vitro and significantly reduce biofilm formation of drug-resistant bacteria. Notably, treatment with high-dose phage HHU1 (MOI = 0.1 and 1) achieved 100% survival in Galleria mellonella larvae infected with drug-resistant K. pneumoniae. These findings demonstrate the potential of phage HHU1 as a promising therapeutic candidate against drug-resistant K. pneumoniae infections.

1 Introduction

Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae) is one of common Gram-negative bacillus and the most important opportunistic hospital pathogens (Wyres et al., 2020). Based on phenotypic and genotypic characteristics, K. pneumoniae can be classified into two types: classical K. pneumoniae (cKp) and hypervirulent K. pneumoniae (hvKp) (Pomakova et al., 2012). Notably, hvKp strains can cause community-acquired infections in immunocompetent individuals of any age group, leading to severe clinical manifestations including pyogenic liver abscesses, pneumonia, and central nervous system infections such as meningitis and brain abscesses (Ye et al., 2016; Russo and Marr, 2019; ). hvKp strains produce capsular polysaccharides that serve as critical virulence determinants, and the majority of hvKp isolates belong to the K1 and K2 capsular serotypes (), among which the K2 serotype isolates are more genetically diverse (). The widespread use of antibiotics to treat infections caused by K. pneumoniae has led to the emergence and spread of bacterial resistance. In recent years, the resistance rate of hvKp to carbapenem antibiotics has increased significantly in China (Yang et al., 2022), and polymyxin-resistant hvKp have also appeared frequently (). Given the escalating challenge of antibiotic treatment failures in hvKp infections, there is a critical imperative to develop novel therapeutic approaches.

Bacteriophages (phages) are naturally occurring bacterial viruses that can rapidly and selectively infect and lyse host bacteria (). Phages have been used to treat bacterial infectious diseases since their discovery, but the increasing maturity and popularity of antibiotic treatments has led to a stunting of phage therapy (Salmond and Fineran, 2015). The escalating crisis of antimicrobial resistance in recent years has prompted a resurgence of scientific interest in phage therapy. Substantial evidence now supports both the efficacy and safety profile of phage therapy in mammalian models and clinical settings (; ; Uyttebroek et al., 2022). Nevertheless, several challenges remain, including the narrow host range of individual phages, and the rapid emergence of bacterial resistance to a single phage (Torres-Barceló et al., 2022; ). The addition of a new phage to a therapeutic cocktail is a key strategy to address these limitations. It can broaden the spectrum of activity against a wider array of bacterial strains or species, mitigate the risk of resistance development through simultaneous targeting of different bacterial receptors or pathways, and enhance the overall efficacy of the treatment through synergistic effects (Yang et al., 2023; ; ). Since the potential success of phage therapy depends on having a large number of phages or so-called phage biobanks, the isolation and characterization of new phages targeting different types of drug-resistant bacteria is still necessary. In addition, analysis of the phage genome to ensure the absence of virulence and resistance genes is a necessary prerequisite for phage therapy.

As of June 2025, nineteen characterized lytic phages targeting K2-type hvKp (K2-hvKp) had been documented, based on a PubMed literature search. Among these, phages KlebP_265 (Yakubovskij et al., 2025), ΦFK1979 (Tang et al., 2023), vB_KpP_HS106 () and PSKP16 (Rahimi et al., 2023) showed relatively good lytic properties, providing a reserve resource for the treatment of K2-hvKp infections. However, the current repertoire of isolated phages remains critically insufficient relative to the clinical prevalence of K2-hvKp strains. There exists an urgent need to expand the phage resource bank through systematic environmental discovery, thereby diversifying therapeutic options for future clinical management of K2-hvKp infections.

In this study, the lytic phage HHU1 was isolated from hospital sewage samples using a K2 capsular serotype K. pneumoniae clinical isolate (strain 1301) as the host. Through comprehensive characterization of its biological properties and whole-genome sequence, coupled with assessment of its bactericidal efficacy against the host bacterium in both in vitro and in vivo models, phage HHU1can be suggested as a potentially therapeutic agent against K2-hvKp.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Bacterial strains and culture conditions

All clinical isolates of K. pneumoniae strains with diverse capsular serotypes used in this study were obtained from hospital specimens and donated by Professor Yigang Tong (Beijing University of Chemical Technology). Strains were preserved in cryovials containing LB medium with 25-30% glycerol at -80°C. Strains cultured in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth at 37°C with shaking (220 rpm). Bacterial colony isolation and enumeration were performed on LB agar plates (1.5% w/v).

2.2 Phage isolation and purification

Hospital sewage samples were centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 10 min, and the supernatant was filtered through 0.45-μM filter unit (Pall, USA). Subsequently, 10 mL of filtrate was added to 100 mL of K. pneumoniae 1301 culture at mid-logarithmic phase (OD600 ≈ 0.6), followed by incubation with shaking (220 rpm) at 37°C for 8 h. The mixture was then centrifuged and filtered. The resulting filtrate underwent serial dilution with sterile water, and 100 μL aliquots of each dilution were mixed with 0.5 mL of mid-log phase bacterial culture for double-layer agar plaque assays (). After solidification, plates were inverted and incubated overnight at 37°C. Individual plaques were picked and transferred to 5 mL of mid-log phase bacterial culture. This enrichment cycle - comprising incubation, centrifugation, filtration, dilution, and co-cultivation - was repeated for three successive rounds to purify the isolated phages.

2.3 Electron microscopy

Phage HHU1 suspensions were concentrated via cesium chloride (CsCl) density gradient centrifugation () and resuspended in 1 mL of sterile deionized water. A 5 μL aliquot of concentrated phage suspension was applied to each copper grid and incubated for 10 min at room temperature. Excess liquid was removed using filter paper wedges by capillary action from the grid edge. Grids were then blotted on fresh filter paper for 1 min. Subsequently, 10 μL of 2% uranyl acetate solution was applied to the grid for 90-second staining. Residual stain was removed with filter paper wedges, followed by air-drying on filter paper for 3 h in a desiccator. Finally, samples were examined using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (JEM-1200EX, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) at 80 kV.

2.4 Determination of the optimal multiplicity of infection

Phage concentrate (1×109 PFU/mL) was subjected to serial dilutions. Aliquots (100 μL) from each dilution were mixed with 100 μL of bacterial suspension (1×108 CFU/mL) according to multiplicity of infection (MOI) values of 0.0001, 0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 1, and 10. The mixtures were inoculated into 5 mL of liquid medium and incubated at 37°C with shaking for 12 h. After incubation, the cultures were centrifuged and filtered. Phage titers were determined using the soft agar overlay method (). The MOI corresponding to the highest phage titer was identified as the optimal MOI.

2.5 Determination of adsorption curve and one-step growth curve

Adsorption experiment was carried out as previously described with some modifications (). Briefly, K. pneumoniae strain 1301 was inoculated into 100 mL of fresh LB liquid medium and cultured to the logarithmic growth phase. Subsequently, phage HHU1 was added and incubated statically at 37°C, and aliquots (1 mL) were collected at 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16 min post-infection. Each sample was immediately centrifuged at 15,000 × g for 1 min at 4°C, and 100 μL of the supernatant was used to quantify free phage titer via the soft agar overlay method. The unadsorbed phage ratio at each time point was calculated relative to the 0-min baseline titer using the formula:

A 2 mL of K. pneumoniae strain 1301 culture (1 × 107 CFU/mL) was mixed with 2 mL of phage HHU1 suspension (1 × 106 PFU/mL). The mixture was incubated stationary at room temperature for 10 min, followed by centrifugation at 12,000 × g for 2 min to pellet the bacterial cells. The pelleted cells were washed twice with sterile water and then resuspended in 20 mL of fresh LB broth. The suspension was incubated with shaking at 37°C for 90 min. During this incubation period, samples were collected at 10 min intervals starting from 0 min. Each sample was centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 2 min to harvest the supernatant. The supernatants collected at each time point were subjected to serial dilution, and the phage titer was determined using soft agar overlay method. This experiment was performed in triplicate. A one-step growth curve was constructed by plotting phage titer against infection time. The latent period and lysis period of phage HHU1 were determined from the curve, and the burst size was calculated according to the formula:

2.6 Host range analysis of the phage HHU1

The lytic activity of phage HHU1 against 33 K. pneumoniae clinical isolates and 16 other Gram-negative bacteria was evaluated using a spot test assay (). Briefly, each bacterial strain was cultured to the logarithmic growth phase (OD600 ≈ 0.6). Subsequently, 0.5 mL of the bacterial culture was mixed with 5 mL of LB semi-solid medium (approximately 48°C) and evenly overlaid onto an LB agar plate. After solidification, 2 μL of phage HHU1 suspension (1×108 PFU/mL) was spotted onto the center of each plate. The plates were then incubated at 37°C overnight. Finally, plaque formation was observed by examining the presence of clear zones on each plate.

2.7 Thermal and pH stability of the phage HHU1

Aliquots (900 μL) of fresh LB broth were dispensed into sterile 1.5 mL centrifuge tubes and incubated in a metal bath at 4, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, and 70°C for 30 min. Following this, 100 μL of phage suspension (approximately 2×1010 PFU/mL) was added to each tube, and samples were incubated at their respective temperatures for 6 h and 12 h. After incubation, phage titers were determined using the soft agar overlay method to evaluate thermal stability. All experiments were performed in triplicate.

For pH stability assessment, LB liquid medium was adjusted to pH values ranging from 2.0 to 14.0 using 1 mol/L HCl and 1 mol/L NaOH. Subsequently, 100 μL of phage suspension (approximately 2×1010 PFU/mL) was added to each 1.5 mL centrifuge tubes containing the pH-adjusted LB broth. The mixtures were incubated at 30°C for 6 h and 12 h, respectively. Following incubation, phage titers were determined via the soft agar overlay method to evaluate phage stability. All experiments were performed in three independent replicates.

2.8 Genome extraction and sequencing

The genomic DNA of phage HHU1 was extracted using the Viral DNA Kit (Omega, Norcross, Georgia, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. DNA libraries were prepared using the NEBNext Ultra™ II DNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina (New England Biolabs Ltd., Beijing, China). Following library preparation, sequencing was performed on the NovaSeq 6000 platform (Illumina, San Diego, USA) using the NovaSeq 6000 S4 Reagent Kit v1.5 (Illumina, San Diego, USA) with a paired-end 150 (PE150) sequencing strategy. The raw sequencing data were processed using Trimmomatic (v0.32) to filter low-quality reads (), and the filtered reads were assembled into the complete phage genome using SPAdes (v3.13.0) ().

2.9 Phage genome annotation and bioinformatics analysis

The genome of phage HHU1 was analyzed using the RAST online server () (https://rast.nmpdr.org/) to predict open reading frames (ORFs). Functional annotation of the encoded proteins was performed using the BLASTp tool (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool for proteins) available on the NCBI platform (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). HHpred against protein data bank (PDB) and Pfam database were used to predict more distant homologs (Söding et al., 2005). The annotated genome sequence was subsequently submitted to the NCBI database. tRNA-encoding genes within the phage genome were detected using tRNAscan-SE () (http://lowelab.ucsc.edu/cgi-bin/tRNAscan-SE2.cgi). Putative virulence genes and pathogenicity-associated genes harbored by the phage genome were predicted using the Virulence Factor Database (VFDB) () (http://www.mgc.ac.cn/VFs/) and PathogenFinder () (http://cge.cbs.dtu.dk/services/PathogenFinder/), respectively. Genome visualization was conducted with the Proksee online tool () (https://proksee.ca/). For phylogenetic analysis, amino acid sequences exhibiting high homology to HHU1’s major capsid and terminase large subunit proteins were retrieved from NCBI. A phylogenetic tree was constructed using MEGA7 software () with the ClustalW algorithm for sequence alignment and the Neighbor-Joining method for tree inference.

2.10 In vitro bactericidal activity test

Test was performed according to with minor modification. Briefly, an overnight culture of K. pneumoniae strain 1301 was diluted 1:100 (v/v) in fresh LB broth and incubated at 37°C with shaking until reaching the early logarithmic phase (OD600 ≈ 0.3). Phage suspensions were then added at MOI of 0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 1, and 10, followed by incubation at 37°C with shaking for 8 h. During the incubation period, samples were collected hourly to monitor bacterial growth via OD600 measurements using the Evolution One spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). All the experiments were repeated three times.

2.11 Effect of phage HHU1 on biofilm formation

As previously described (Tabassum et al., 2018), the effect of phage HHU1 on biofilm formation by multidrug-resistant K. pneumoniae strain 1301 was assessed through co-incubation of phage and bacteria at 37°C. Strain 1301 was inoculated into Tryptic Soy Broth (TSB) medium and cultured with shaking until reaching an OD600 of 0.3. Subsequently, 100 μL of the bacterial suspension was aliquoted into a 96-well microtiter plate (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), followed by the addition of 100 μL of phage HHU1 suspensions at final MOI values of 0.001, 0.01, 0.1, and 1. An equal volume of sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) was used as a negative control instead of phage suspension. The mixture was thoroughly mixed and incubated at 37 °C for 48 h (three biological replicates per group). After incubation, biofilm formation was quantified using the crystal violet staining assay (). Finally, bound crystal violet was solubilized with 200 μL of 95% ethanol, and the absorbance was measured at 590 nm using the Multiskan SkyHigh Microplate Spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).

To quantify the viable cells within the biofilm, phage HHU1 was mixed with the host strain 1301 at different MOIs and co-incubated statically for 48 h as described above. After incubation, the planktonic cells were removed, and the biofilm was gently washed twice with 200 μL of sterile PBS. The biofilm was then scraped and resuspended in PBS, followed by sonication in a 96-well plate for 10 min to disrupt the biofilm structure and release the bacterial cells. Subsequently, 100 µL droplets of tenfold serial dilutions ((10−1 to 10−6) of the cell suspension were spotted onto LB plates and evenly spread across the surface using a sterile spreader to ensure uniform distribution. The plates were incubated at 37°C for 16 h, and the colonies were enumerated to evaluate the antibacterial efficacy of phage HHU1 against the biofilm.

2.12 Galleria mellonella in vivo infection model and phage therapy

Galleria mellonella (G. mellonella) larvae have been introduced as an alternative model to evaluate the efficacy of phage therapy (Tsai et al., 2016). In this study, G. mellonella larvae were obtained from Huiyude Biotech Company (Tianjin, China). To establish the infection model, the pathogenicity of strain 1301 toward G. mellonella was evaluated. Fifty larvae (weighing 250–300 mg each) were randomly assigned to five experimental groups (n=10 per group). Each group was injected with 5 µL of the following solutions: PBS (negative control), or strain 1301 suspensions at concentrations of 5×106 CFU/mL, 1×107 CFU/mL, 2×107 CFU/mL, or 4×107 CFU/mL. The larvae were then maintained at 37 °C in the dark for five days. Larval survival was recorded every 12 h, and individuals exhibiting no movement or melanization were considered dead. The median lethal dose (LD50) was calculated based on the infection model.

To evaluate phage therapy efficacy, G. mellonella larvae were administered bacterial and phage inoculations in a staged approach. Sixty larvae were randomly allocated into six groups (n = 10 per group) for different treatments. Group I: Infected with 5 µL of strain 1301 (1×107 CFU/mL) at time 0, followed by 5 µL of PBS at 2 h post-infection (hpi). Group II: Administered 5 µL of PBS at time 0, followed by 5 µL of phage HHU1 (1×108 PFU/mL) at 2 hpi. Groups III–VI: Infected with 5 µL of strain 1301 (1×107 CFU/mL) at time 0, followed by 5 µL of phage HHU1 at 2 hpi with the following titers, Group III (1×104 PFU/mL), Group IV (1×105 PFU/mL), Group V (1×106 PFU/mL), and Group VI (1×107 PFU/mL). Survival rates were monitored and recorded as described above.

2.13 Statistical analysis

GraphPad Prism 8.0.1 (GrapPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA) was used to plot the data. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to evaluate the difference between the experimental and control groups. A p-value<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3 Results

3.1 Isolation, purification, and electron microscopic morphology of phage HHU1

Using K. pneumoniae strain 1301 as the host bacterium, a lytic phage designated HHU1 was isolated from sewage collected at Zhumadian Central Hospital. Following three rounds of purification, the phage formed uniform lytic plaques on double-layer agar plates containing the strain 1301. The plaques exhibited a mean diameter of 3.8 ± 0.24 mm, characterized by a clear center surrounded by a translucent halo (Figure 1A). The presence of a halo suggests the phage’s potential ability to produce depolymerase for degrading bacterial capsular polysaccharides (Zhao et al., 2024).

Figure 1

TEM revealed that phage HHU1 possesses an icosahedral head and a contractile tail. The head diameter was measured as 54.62 ± 2.37 nm (n=10), while the tail diameter was 66.75 ± 3.18 nm (n=10) (Figure 1B). Morphologically, phage HHU1 belongs to the Myoviridae family and exhibits structural similarities to the well-characterized phage T4.

3.2 Replication characteristics of phage HHU1

Phage HHU1 was co-incubated with K. pneumoniae strain 1301 at different MOIs. When infecting at an MOI of 0.001, phage HHU1 yielded the highest progeny production following host lysis (Figure 2A). These findings indicate that 0.001 represents the optimal MOI for maximizing progeny release during HHU1 replication.

Figure 2

Adsorption is the initial step for phages to infect bacteria. The adsorption kinetics of phage HHU1 were analyzed to determine its binding capacity to the host bacterium. As shown in Figure 2B, approximately 50% of HHU1 phages adsorbed onto the host surface within 4 min of co-incubation. Following 8 min of incubation, over 90% of phages had completed adsorption, after which the adsorption rate plateaued.

The latent period, lysis period, and progeny phage yield during HHU1 replication in the host bacterium can be determined through one-step growth curve analysis. As shown in Figure 2C, the phage titer remained unchanged for the initial 10 min, followed by a progressive increase until plateauing at 60 min post-infection. This indicates a latent period of 10 min and a lysis period of 50 min for phage HHU1. Based on the initial bacterial count (approximately 2×107 CFU/mL) and the phage titer at the plateau phase (mean 2.68×109 PFU/mL), the burst size of phage HHU1 was calculated as 134.17 ± 33.81 PFU/cell using the methodology described in the Materials.

3.3 Host range of phage HHU1

The host range of phage HHU1 was determined using 33 clinically isolated K. pneumoniae strain strains. The results revealed that HHU1 exhibited lytic activity against 7 of the 33 tested strains, all of which belonged to the K2 serotype (Table 1). It is worth noting that these seven strains exhibited different levels of drug resistance (Supplementary Table S1). Unfortunately, phage HHU1 did not exhibit lytic activity against K. pneumoniae strains of other capsular types, nor did it lyse common hospital-acquired Gram-negative bacteria (Supplementary Table S2), underscoring its narrow and specific lytic host range.

Table 1

SpeciesStrainsST typeCapsular typeSusceptibilityOrigin
Klebsiella pneumoniae1301ST65K2+307 Hospital
1307ST65K2+307 Hospital
CH-03ST65K2+Central Hospital
CH-05ST65K2+Central Hospital
CH-71ST86K2+Central Hospital
CH-113ST86K2+Central Hospital
CH-188ST86K2+Central Hospital
K7ST23K1Aviation General Hospital
064ST23K1Aviation General Hospital
081ST23K1Aviation General Hospital
2024ST23K1Aviation General Hospital
2752ST23K1Aviation General Hospital
2755ST23K1Aviation General Hospital
S-2007ST23K1Aviation General Hospital
1241ST11K15307 Hospital
1291ST11K27307 Hospital
1300ST11K16307 Hospital
2004ST11K47Aviation General Hospital
2005ST11K25Aviation General Hospital
2006ST11K47Aviation General Hospital
2008ST11K64Aviation General Hospital
2009ST11K64Aviation General Hospital
2012ST11K25Aviation General Hospital
2015ST11K47Aviation General Hospital
2022ST11K47Aviation General Hospital
2026ST11K64Aviation General Hospital
2086ST11K64Aviation General Hospital
2002ST15K19Aviation General Hospital
2003ST15K19Aviation General Hospital
2013ST15K19Aviation General Hospital
2017ST15K19Aviation General Hospital
2027ST15K19Aviation General Hospital
2068ST15K19Aviation General Hospital

Lytic activity of phage HHU1 against clinical isolates.

Symbols: “+” denotes the formation of transparent plaques following co-culture of phage HHU1 with the test bacterium; “-” indicates no plaque formation.

3.4 Thermal and pH stability of phage HHU1

Temperature and pH are critical factors influencing the storage and application of phage. To evaluate these parameters, the stability of phage HHU1 was assessed under various temperature and pH conditions. As shown in Figure 3A, the titer of phage HHU1 remained virtually unchanged following 6 h or even 12 h of incubation at temperatures ranging from 4°C to 40°C. However, viability declined progressively at elevated temperatures, with complete inactivation occurring after 12 h at 70°C. These findings suggest that phage HHU1 maintains stability under ambient temperature conditions.

Figure 3

Regarding pH stability, phage titers remained essentially unchanged (≤0.5-log reduction) across pH 5–10 during 6 h incubations (Figure 3B). Exposure to acidic conditions (pH ≤4.0) induced significant titer reductions, culminating in complete inactivation at pH 3.0 following 12 h of incubation. Under alkaline conditions, a pH-dependent decrease in viability was observed, and total inactivation at pH 13.0 after 12 h. Collectively, these results demonstrate that phage HHU1 maintains exceptional stability across a broad pH range (5.0-10.0).

3.5 Genomic characterization of phage HHU1

Whole-genome sequencing and analysis of phage HHU1 revealed a double-stranded DNA genome of 47,779 bp with a GC content of 49.2%. The genome sequence was deposited in the NCBI GenBank database under the accession number PQ438797.1. Annotation of the HHU1 genome using bioinformatic software revealed a total of 72 open reading frames (ORFs). Among these, 26 ORFs demonstrated homology to functionally annotated proteins in the NCBI database, while the remaining ORFs showed homology to hypothetical proteins (Table 2). Notably, no known antibiotic resistance genes, virulence factor genes, or tRNA genes were identified within the HHU1 genome.

Table 2

ORFsStrandStartStopLength (AA)Predicted protein functionBLASTp resultQuery coverE-valuesIdentityAccession
ORF1+384965193hypothetical proteinKlebsiella phage vB_KpnM_JustaPhage99%3e-14099.48%YP_010684076.1
ORF21150100149hypothetical proteinKlebsiella phage RCIP0093100%2e-2489.80%WPJ55596.1
ORF322711147374hypothetical proteinKlebsiella phage RCIP0047100%0.097.59%WPJ52268.1
ORF42567227198hypothetical proteinKlebsiella phage RCIP0063100%5e-6498.98%WPJ53524.1
ORF52755257061hypothetical proteinKlebsiella phage RCIP0054100%6e-3598.36%WPJ52911.1
ORF62916274357hypothetical proteinKlebsiella phage pKp383100%2e-3298.25%YP_010684176.1
ORF73128291371hypothetical proteinKlebsiella phage vB_KpnM_KpV52100%3e-4295.77%YP_009597597.1
ORF855813224785DNA primaseKlebsiella phage BUCT_47333100%0.098.22%YP_010683798.1
ORF95882560492transcriptional regulatorKlebsiella phage vB_KpnM_JustaPhage100%6e-5898.91%YP_010684068.1
ORF1064065945153hypothetical proteinKlebsiella phage vB_KleM_KB2100%2e-107100.00%YP_010684863.1
ORF1168736403156hypothetical proteinKlebsiella phage RCIP0063100%3e-111100.00%WPJ53517.1
ORF1285786908556helicaseKlebsiella phage vB_KpnM_KpV52100%0.099.82%YP_009597592.1
ORF138789859265hypothetical proteinKlebsiella phage vB_KpnM_KpV52100%1e-40100.00%YP_009597591.1
ORF149012878276hypothetical proteinKlebsiella phage vB_KpnM_JustaPhage100%3e-47100.00%YP_010684062.1
ORF159186901656hypothetical proteinKlebsiella phage VLCpiM12a100%7e-3198.21%YP_010683818.1
ORF169410918375hypothetical proteinKlebsiella phage vB_KpnM_JustaPhage100%2e-4898.67%YP_010684060.1
ORF17+955110534327hypothetical proteinKlebsiella phage RCIP0063100%0.099.69%WPJ53511.1
ORF18+1054011664374exonucleaseKlebsiella phage vB_KpnM_JustaPhage100%0.098.66%YP_010684058.1
ORF19+116671179241hypothetical proteinKlebsiella phage phage RCIP0030100%3e-18100.00%WPJ51019.1
ORF20+118771215291hypothetical proteinKlebsiella phage phage RCIP0030100%8e-58100.00%WPJ51018.1
ORF21+1223213044270hypothetical proteinKlebsiella phage RCIP0063100%0.0100.00%WPJ53507.1
ORF22+130951321439hypothetical proteinKlebsiella phage100%9e-18100.00%WPJ53506.1
ORF23+1326215436724DNA polymeraseKlebsiella phage MEW1100%0.095.44%YP_010684111.1
ORF24+1543315774113hypothetical proteinKlebsiella phage vB_KpnM_SCNJ1-Y100%4e-7799.12%WIL01649.1
ORF25160361579181hypothetical proteinKlebsiella phage vB_KpnM_JustaPhage100%1e-4898.77%YP_010684049.1
ORF26163141608775hypothetical proteinKlebsiella phage RCIP0045100%4e-47100.00%WPJ52121.1
ORF27166291651338hypothetical proteinKlebsiella phage RCIP0063100%8e-16100.00%WPJ53501.1
ORF28+1668417241185endolysinKlebsiella phage KpTRp1100%7e-13499.46%XDG30680.1
ORF29+1724117555104Rz-like spaninKlebsiella phage vB_KpnM_FZ14100%1e-66100.00%YP_010684769.1
ORF30+175521778878hypothetical proteinKlebsiella phage RCIP0033100%3e-4896.15%WPJ51408.1
ORF311867617783297tail fiber proteinKlebsiella phage KpTRp1100%0.098.99%XDG30677.1
ORF321939618680238structural proteinKlebsiella phage vB_KpnM_KpV5298%5e-17098.72%YP_009597572.1
ORF33196701949757hypothetical proteinKlebsiella phage RCIP0063100%2e-3198.25%WPJ53495.1
ORF342168719681668tail proteinKlebsiella phage VLCpiS13b100%0.099.10%YP_009597570.1
ORF352289221684402baseplate wedge subunitKlebsiella phage vB_KpnM_JustaPhage100%0.0100.00%YP_010684039.1
ORF362323222885115hypothetical proteinKlebsiella phage RCIP0030100%6e-7599.13%WPJ51001.1
ORF372390623232224baseplate spikeKlebsiella phage vB_KleM_KB2100%2e-16399.55%YP_010684833.1
ORF382484224192216baseplate proteinKlebsiella phage KpTRp1100%2e-15299.54%XDG30671.1
ORF392626324839474baseplate hubKlebsiella phage vB_KpnM_KpV52100%0.098.52%YP_009597565.1
ORF402771726266483tail length tape measure proteinKlebsiella phage 1611E-K2-1100%0.096.27%YP_010684662.1
ORF41280132771798hypothetical proteinKlebsiella phage vB_KpnM_KpVB3100%2e-6496.94%WQZ01381.1
ORF42281612799156hypothetical proteinKlebsiella phage vB_KpnM_KpV52100%2e-34100.00%YP_009597562.1
ORF432857428200124hypothetical proteinKlebsiella phage vB_KpnM_SCNJ1-Y100%2e-8499.19%WIL01631.1
ORF44+287012889865hypothetical proteinKlebsiella phage Geezett100%9e-3693.85%YP_010683917.1
ORF45+288952916790hypothetical proteinKlebsiella phage vB_KpnM_JustaPhage100%7e-6198.89%YP_010684029.1
ORF46+291642928941hypothetical proteinKlebsiella phage vB_KpnM_JustaPhage100%2e-21100.00%YP_010684028.1
ORF47+292892945956hypothetical proteinKlebsiella pneumoniae100%4e-31100.00%WP_243202410.1
ORF48+294592961150hypothetical proteinKlebsiella phage vB_KpnM_JustaPhage100%6e-28100.00%YP_010684026.1
ORF49+2960830036142hypothetical proteinKlebsiella phage vB_KleM_KB2100%1e-5869.93%YP_010684912.1
ORF50+301533044998hypothetical proteinKlebsiella phage RCIP0113100%6e-6397.96%WPJ57023.1
ORF51+3053231212226hypothetical proteinKlebsiella phage RCIP0015100%6e-15794.69%WPJ49148.1
ORF523166731251138hypothetical proteinKlebsiella phage phiYH65100%4e-9298.55%XDG19024.1
ORF533281431681337tail sheathKlebsiella phage vB_KpnM_JustaPhage100%0.099.73%YP_010684023.1
ORF543343832857193hypothetical proteinKlebsiella phage RCIP0063100%6e-14098.96%YP_010685722.1
ORF553377833425117hypothetical proteinKlebsiella pneumoniae100%5e-80100.00%WP_193852692.1
ORF563427833775167tail completion or Neck1 proteinKlebsiella phage vB_KpnM_FZ14100%1e-11496.41%YP_010684824.1
ORF57+3502935667212hypothetical proteinKlebsiella phage vB_KpnM_KpV52100%5e-15399.53%YP_009597552.1
ORF58+357473587843hypothetical proteinKlebsiella phagevB_KpnM_FZ14100%2e-22100.00%YP_010684817.1
ORF593640635903167hypothetical proteinKlebsiella phage phiYH65100%1e-8994.61%XDG19031.1
ORF603696036541139hypothetical proteinKlebsiella phage vB_KleM_KB2100%1e-9999.28%QNI20530.1
ORF613729636979105hypothetical proteinKlebsiella phage RCIP0030100%2e-6595.24%WPJ50982.1
ORF623877437329481endonuclease-like proteinKlebsiella phage phiYH6596%0.094.62%XDG19034.1
ORF633985838824344major head proteinKlebsiella phage vB_KpnM_FZ14100%0.096.22%YP_010684811.1
ORF644034939861162virion structural proteinKlebsiella phage vB_KpnM_KpV79100%1e-9993.83%YP_009615286.1
ORF654145540361364head maturation proteaseKlebsiella phage vB_KpnM_FZ14100%0.099.18%YP_010684809.1
ORF66+415324175373nucleotide kinaseKlebsiella phage vB_KpnM_KpV79100%4e-46100.00%YP_009615284.1
ORF67+417534193861hypothetical proteinKlebsiella phage RCIP0071100%5e-3798.36%WPJ52081.1
ORF68+419414207243hypothetical proteinKlebsiella phage vB_KpnM_KpV52100%4e-2295.35%YP_009597541.1
ORF69+420694225762hypothetical proteinKlebsiella phage VLCpiM12a100%7e-38100.00%YP_010683868.1
ORF70+422414244166hypothetical proteinKlebsiella sp. GG_Kp14295%5e-3485.71%WP_348907484.1
ORF71+425094271568hypothetical proteinKlebsiella phage VLCpiM12a98%2e-1656.72%YP_010683870.1
ORF72+427084286050hypothetical proteinKlebsiella phage RCIP0015100%7e-2594.00%WPJ49125.1
ORF73+428574305766hypothetical proteinKlebsiella phage VLCpiM12a100%5e-2978.79%YP_010683872.1
ORF744380843047253minor head proteinKlebsiella phage vB_KpnM_FZ14100%0.098.81%YP_010684802.1
ORF75+4393644244102hypothetical proteinKlebsiella phage RCIP0030100%6e-6696.08%WPJ50968.1
ORF764563344236465portal proteinKlebsiella phage vB_KpnM_JustaPhage100%0.098.51%YP_010684000.1
ORF774708445636482terminase large subunitKlebsiella phage SBP100%0.099.38%YP_010684543.1
ORF784753247074152terminase small subunitKlebsiella phage JD001100%1e-10498.68%YP_007392856.1

Genomic annotation of phage HHU1.

The symbol “+” denotes a positive strand, while “-” denotes a negative strand.

Based on the genomic positions of functional genes, the HHU1 genome exhibits a modular architecture, with functionally related genes predominantly clustered together. The functional protein within the phage HHU1 genome is visualized in Figure 4, revealing a genomic architecture primarily organized into four functional modules: phage lysis, packaging, replication and structural proteins.

Figure 4

Given that phage HHU1 forms plaques with halos on double-layer agar plates containing its host bacterium, it was hypothesized that the phage genome harbors a gene encoding a depolymerase. To investigate this, all proteins encoded in the genome of phage HHU1 were analyzed using DePolymerase Predictor (DePP), a tool designed for targeted identification of phage depolymerases (Magill and Skvortsov, 2023). The results indicated that the protein encoded by ORF34 (tail protein) exhibited the highest probability values (Supplementary Table S3). Subsequent alignment against PDB revealed that this protein shares 99.68% similarity with the established depolymerase KP32gp38 from Klebsiella phage KP32 (Supplementary Table S4). These findings strongly suggest that the ORF34-encoded protein functions as a depolymerase in phage HHU1.

3.6 Phylogenetic analysis of the phage HHU1

To elucidate the evolutionary relationship between phage HHU1 and other phages, phylogenetic trees were constructed using the evolutionarily significant and conserved major capsid protein (ORF63) and terminase large subunit (ORF77) of phage HHU1, aligned with homologous protein sequences obtained from NCBI. In the phylogenetic tree derived from the major capsid protein amino acid sequences, phage HHU1 formed a distinct clade (Figure 5A). In contrast, the tree constructed using the large terminase subunit amino acid sequences showed that phage HHU1 clustered with Klebsiella phage JD001 (classified within the genus Jedunavirus), indicating a close evolutionary relationship between the two phages (Figure 5B). Based on these results and the general guidelines established by the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV) (Turner et al., 2023), phage HHU1 should be classified as a novel species within the genus Jedunavirus.

Figure 5

3.7 Antimicrobial activity of phage HHU1 in vitro

Using uninfected strain 1301 as the control, the lytic activity of phage HHU1 against strain 1301 was determined at different MOIs. In the control group, bacterial cell density (measured as OD600) gradually increased during the experimental period and reached the stationary phase after 7 h of cultivation. In contrast, a significant decrease in absorbance was observed in phage HHU1-infected bacteria at MOIs of 0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 1, and 10. As shown in Figure 6A, higher MOIs (ranging from 1 to 10) induced a rapid decline in OD600 within less than 1 h. Although a slight increase in OD600 occurred within 1 h post-treatment at lower MOIs (ranging from 0.001 to 0.1), a rapid subsequent decrease in OD600 was observed over time. In all phage-treated groups, host cell growth was markedly suppressed within 7 h, indicating that phage HHU1 exhibits strong bactericidal activity against strain 1301 in vitro.

Figure 6

A key virulence trait of K. pneumoniae is its ability to form biofilms, which enhances resistance to antimicrobial agents and host defenses (). To assess whether phage HHU1 could disrupt preformed biofilms of K. pneumoniae 1301 in vitro, the crystal violet assay was employed to quantify biofilm biomass after phage treatment. Compared to the negative control group, biofilm formation by bacteria treated with phage HHU1 at various MOIs (ranging from 0.001 to 1) was significantly reduced (Figure 6B). Moreover, phages administered at varying MOIs resulted in significant killing of biofilm-embedded bacteria compared to the control group (Figure 6C). These findings indicate that phage HHU1 effectively inhibits biofilm biomass and the number of viable bacteria within the biofilm.

3.8 In vivo therapeutic evaluation of phage HHU1 in a G. mellonella infection model

In recent years, the G. mellonella model has proven to be an effective tool for evaluating the therapeutic efficacy of phages against bacterial infections (; ; ; ). Therefore, this study utilized G. mellonella larvae as an animal model to assess the efficacy of phage HHU1 as an antimicrobial agent for treating infections caused by drug-resistant K. pneumoniae. First, the survival of larvae injected with varying concentrations of K. pneumoniae strain 1301 was monitored over five days to determine the LD50 of strain 1301 for G. mellonella larvae. As shown in Figure 7A, a concentration-dependent mortality was observed in larvae post-infection. High bacterial concentrations (4 × 107 CFU/mL) induced 100% mortality within 36 h, while low concentrations (5 × 106 CFU/mL) resulted in only 20% mortality by 120 h. Based on the survival curve, the optimal dose of strain 1301 required to achieve an LD50 in larvae was 1 × 107 CFU/mL.

Figure 7

Subsequently, under the LD50 infection dose, the therapeutic efficacy of phage HHU1 was evaluated by injecting varying concentrations (MOIs ranging from 0.001 to 1). Compared to the bacteria-only control group (50% survival), phage-treated larvae exhibited 100% survival at MOIs of 0.1 and 1, and 90% survival at MOIs of 0.001 and 0.01 (Figure 7B). Notably, larvae injected with a high concentration of phage HHU1 (1 × 108 PFU/mL) in the absence of bacterial infection maintained 100% survival, indicating the safety of phage HHU1 for the larvae. These findings demonstrate that phage HHU1 effectively reduces infection caused by drug-resistant K. pneumoniae when administered as a therapeutic agent in this in vivo model.

4 Discussion

Clinical isolates of K. pneumoniae are evolving towards increasingly high levels of antimicrobial resistance, establishing this species as one of the most challenging infectious bacterial pathogens to control (). The escalating threat of antibiotic resistance to healthcare systems has led to a diminished efficacy of antimicrobial agents in effectively combating infections, concurrently driving rises in morbidity and mortality (Meybodi et al., 2021). Consequently, the development of novel antimicrobial agents has become a major focus. As natural predators of bacteria, phages exhibit a bactericidal mechanism entirely distinct from that of antibiotics. Capable of killing multidrug-resistant bacteria, phages have emerged as a promising novel therapeutic approach for combating resistant bacterial infections (Peng et al., 2025; Yao et al., 2025). The isolation of lytic phages constitutes the initial step in phage therapy applications. Given that hospital sewage environments harbor mixed populations of various bacteria, phages, antimicrobial agents, and nutrients, they represent a rich reservoir for isolating phages capable of lysing clinically drug-resistant bacteria (Wang et al., 2024; Masalane et al., 2025; Mirza et al., 2025). In this study, a lytic phage (designated as HHU1) targeting multidrug-resistant K. pneumoniae was successfully isolated from hospital sewage, and its efficacy was systematically evaluated.

Most K. pneumoniae strains are encapsulated by capsular polysaccharides (CPS), which constitute a critical virulence factor promoting bacterial survival during infection and providing pathogen protection (Xu et al., 2024). Phage HHU1 forms plaques with characteristic halos on double-layer agar plates containing host bacteria (Figure 1A), This halo phenomenon has been confirmed to result from the activity of a depolymerase, an enzyme produced during phage-mediated lysis that degrades bacterial CPS (). Bioinformatic analysis identified that the protein encoded by ORF34 in the HHU1 genome exhibits 99.68% sequence similarity to depolymerase KP32gp38 (Squeglia et al., 2020) from Klebsiella phage KP32, further supporting the presence of depolymerase activity in phage HHU1. Depolymerases recognize and degrade bacterial CPS, thereby enabling phages to access and bind secondary receptors on the bacterial surface (Pires et al., 2016). In addition, CPS disruption exposes bacteria to host immune surveillance, facilitating immune clearance and reducing infection severity (Majkowska-Skrobek et al., 2018). Phages encoding depolymerases demonstrate enhanced therapeutic potential due to their dual antibacterial mechanisms.

Biofilms are complex structured communities composed of microbial-derived extracellular polysaccharide matrices, contributing to nearly 80% of bacterial infections (Singh et al., 2019). These structures protect bacteria against host defense mechanisms and the action of antibiotics. Biofilm formation by K. pneumoniae represents a critical step in its pathogenesis, facilitating colonization of the respiratory, gastrointestinal, and urinary tracts, and contributing to the development of invasive infections (Wang et al., 2020). Consequently, effective biofilm eradication constitutes a major research focus in K. pneumoniae infection treatment. Recent studies reveal that depolymerases not only facilitate the degradation of CPS but also disrupt biofilm formation and reduce bacterial virulence, highlighting their critical roles in phage infection dynamics and host-pathogen interactions (Wu et al., 2019; ). In this study, phage HHU1 effectively inhibited biofilm formation by clinical K. pneumoniae isolates, exhibiting an MOI-dependent manner where higher MOIs correlated with enhanced inhibitory activity (Figure 6B). This observation aligns with findings previously reported for K. pneumoniae phages Kpph9 () and P560 (), which also possess depolymerase activity. Collectively, these results suggest that phages encoding depolymerases hold substantial potential for preventing and treating biofilm-associated K. pneumoniae infections.

Phages initiate infection by recognizing and binding to specific cell surface structures, with CPS serving as both common receptors and critical determinants of phage host range specificity (; Volozhantsev et al., 2022). Host range analysis revealed that phage HHU1 lysed only 7 out of 33 clinically isolated K. pneumoniae strains, all belonging to the K2 capsular serotype (Table 1). This observation suggests that phage HHU1 may recognize the K2 capsule to initiate infection. This strict host specificity parallels that observed in previously characterized lytic phages targeting K2-K. pneumoniae, such as Kpph9 (), B1 (Pertics et al., 2021), and vB_KlebPS_265 (Yakubovskij et al., 2025). Traditional serotyping methods classify K. pneumoniae into at least 79 chemically distinct serotypes based on variations in capsule composition and structure (Pan et al., 2015). Even a single broad-spectrum phage is insufficient to target a substantial proportion of all described capsular types. To overcome the challenge of the narrow host range inherent to individual phages, formulating a phage cocktail comprising phages recognizing distinct K. pneumoniae capsular types presents a viable strategy. Phage cocktail therapy has been demonstrated to achieve enhanced therapeutic efficacy (; Rotman et al., 2024).

For practical applications, phages must withstand diverse environmental conditions, as their stability under varying temperatures and pH levels directly impacts their therapeutic efficacy against pathogens. In this study, phage HHU1 demonstrated considerable stability across a broad temperature range (4–60°C) and pH spectrum (pH 5–10), showing comparable environmental resistance to previously characterized K. pneumoniae phages vB_KpP_HS106 () and vB_KlebPS_265 (Yakubovskij et al., 2025). The superior stability of HHU1 holds significant value for the future development of phage-based formulations suitable for oral, topical, or systemic administration. Previous studies have established that phages with large burst sizes and short latent periods correlate with enhanced bacterial inactivation efficiency (). The one-step growth curve analysis of HHU1 revealed a latent period of 10 min and a burst size of approximately 134 PFU/cell. These kinetic parameters surpass those reported for K. pneumoniae phages vB_KlebPS_265 (15 min, 26 PFU/cell) (Yakubovskij et al., 2025) and Kpph9 (11 min, 25 PFU/cell) (), indicating superior lytic performance.

Sequencing and analysis of phage genomes enhance the understanding of phage genomics and improve the reliability and safety of phages for clinical therapeutic applications. Therapeutic phages should avoid carrying genetic features that may exacerbate infection risks, such as lysogeny-associated genes, toxin genes, antibiotic resistance genes, and genes encoding highly immunogenic proteins (Skurnik et al., 2025). Notably, no genes linked to antibiotic resistance, virulence, or lysogeny were detected in phage HHU1, indicating its lytic nature and safety profile—essential prerequisites for its future clinical deployment.

Assessment of phage antimicrobial activity in vitro can be achieved by measuring bacterial growth kinetics in the presence of phages. In this study, phage HHU1 completely suppressed the growth of its host bacterium within the 8 h testing period across all MOIs (Figure 6A), exhibiting a prolonged suppression duration compared to K. pneumoniae phages vB_KlebPS_265 (Yakubovskij et al., 2025) and Kpph9 (). The G. mellonella model, valued for its low cost, ease of implementation, and possession of an innate immune system highly analogous to humans, has been widely employed to investigate pathogen virulence and the therapeutic efficacy of phages against bacterial infections (; ; ). In a LD50 infection model using G. mellonella, treatment with phage HHU1 at the high MOIs (MOI = 0.1 and 1) achieved a 100% survival rate (Figure 7B). This survival rate exceeds those previously reported for K. pneumoniae phages vB_KpnP_KL106-ULIP47 (Thiry et al., 2019) and vB_KpnS_SXFY507 () in treating infected G. mellonella. This study administered phage therapy at 2 h post-infection in G. mellonella. The effects of prophylactic phage therapy (administered prior to bacterial infection) or co-injection therapy (simultaneous administration of bacteria and phage) were not evaluated. However, previous studies have demonstrated that prophylactic phage therapy and co-injection phage therapy are more effective than remedial phage therapy in improving survival rates of K. pneumoniae-infected G. mellonella larvae (). The favorable antimicrobial efficacy of phage HHU1 against K. pneumoniae both in vitro and in vivo presents opportunities for its future application as an antimicrobial agent to control infections caused by drug-resistant K. pneumoniae. This study did not assess the frequency of resistant mutant emergence during phage treatment. This factor represents a critical determinant of long-term therapeutic efficacy and warrants further investigation in future studies.

Statements

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are publicly available. This data can be found here: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/2843366331.

Author contributions

PH: Software, Writing – original draft, Data curation, Conceptualization, Validation. LW: Investigation, Formal Analysis, Writing – original draft. SS: Writing – original draft, Methodology. LY: Resources, Writing – review & editing. EL: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Resources, Project administration. YY: Writing – review & editing, Resources.

Funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by the Key Science and Technology Project of Henan Province (Grant Nos.252102310165 and 252102310315), Higher Education Teaching Research Project of Huanghuai University (PX-29241263).

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Professor Tong Yigang from Beijing University of Chemical Technology for providing clinical isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be constructed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcimb.2025.1668727/full#supplementary-material

References

  • 1

    AbedonS. T.HerschlerT. D.StoparD. (2001). Bacteriophage latent-period evolution as a response to resource availability. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.67, 42334241. doi: 10.1128/AEM.67.9.4233-4241.2001

  • 2

    Al-BusaidiB.Al-MuzahmiM.Al-ShabibiZ.RizviM.Al-RashdiA.Al-JardaniA.et al. (2024). Hypervirulent Capsular Serotypes K1 and K2 Klebsiella pneumoniae Strains Demonstrate Resistance to Serum Bactericidal Activity and Galleria mellonella Lethality. Int. J. Mol. Sci.25, 1944. doi: 10.3390/ijms25031944

  • 3

    BankevichA.NurkS.AntipovD.GurevichA. A.DvorkinM.KulikovA. S.et al. (2012). SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J. Comput. Biol.19, 455477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021

  • 4

    BaoJ.WuN.ZengY.ChenL.LiL.YangL.et al. (2020). Non-active antibiotic and bacteriophage synergism to successfully treat recurrent urinary tract infection caused by extensively drug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae. Emerg. Microbes Infect.9, 771774. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2020.1747950

  • 5

    BeetonM. L.AlvesD. R.EnrightM. C.JenkinsA. T. (2015). Assessing phage therapy against Pseudomonas aeruginosa using a Galleria mellonella infection model. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents46, 196200. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2015.04.005

  • 6

    Bialek-DavenetS.CriscuoloA.AilloudF.PassetV.JonesL.Delannoy-VieillardA. S.et al. (2014). Genomic definition of hypervirulent and multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae clonal groups. Emerg. Infect. Dis.20, 18121820. doi: 10.3201/eid2011.140206

  • 7

    BolgerA. M.LohseM.UsadelB. (2014). Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics30, 21142120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170

  • 8

    BrettinT.DavisJ. J.DiszT.EdwardsR. A.GerdesS.OlsenG. J.et al. (2015). RASTtk: a modular and extensible implementation of the RAST algorithm for building custom annotation pipelines and annotating batches of genomes. Sci. Rep.5, 8365. doi: 10.1038/srep08365

  • 9

    ChenC.TaoZ.LiT.ChenH.ZhaoY.SunX. (2023). Isolation and characterization of novel bacteriophage vB_KpP_HS106 for Klebsiella pneumonia K2 and applications in foods. Front. Microbiol.14, 1227147. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1227147

  • 10

    ChenH.LiuH.GongY.DunstanR. A.MaZ.ZhouC.et al. (2024). A Klebsiella-phage cocktail to broaden the host range and delay bacteriophage resistance both in vitro and in vivo. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes10, 127. doi: 10.1038/s41522-024-00603-8

  • 11

    ChungK. M.LiauX. L.TangS. S. (2023). Bacteriophages and Their Host Range in Multidrug-Resistant Bacterial Disease Treatment. Pharm. (Basel)16, 1467. doi: 10.3390/ph16101467

  • 12

    CosentinoS.Voldby LarsenM.Møller AarestrupF.LundO. (2013). PathogenFinder–distinguishing friend from foe using bacterial whole genome sequence data. PLoS One8, e77302. doi: 10.1371/annotation/b84e1af7-c127-45c3-be22-76abd977600f

  • 13

    DingY.HuangC.ZhuW.LiZ.ZhangY.WangJ.et al. (2023). Characterization of a novel Jerseyvirus phage T102 and its inhibition effect on biofilms of multidrug-resistant Salmonella. Virus Res.326, 199054. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2023.199054

  • 14

    DunstanR. A.BamertR. S.TanK. S.ImbulgodaU.BarlowC. K.TaiaroaG.et al. (2023). Epitopes in the capsular polysaccharide and the porin OmpK36 receptors are required for bacteriophage infection of Klebsiella pneumoniae. Cell Rep.42, 112551. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112551

  • 15

    FengJ.LiF.SunL.DongL.GaoL.WangH.et al. (2023). Characterization and genome analysis of phage vB_KpnS_SXFY507 against Klebsiella pneumoniae and efficacy assessment in Galleria mellonella larvae. Front. Microbiol.14, 1081715. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1081715

  • 16

    GórskiA.MiędzybrodzkiR.WęgrzynG.Jończyk-MatysiakE.BorysowskiJ.Weber-DąbrowskaB. (2020). Phage therapy: Current status and perspectives. Med. Res. Rev.40, 459463. doi: 10.1002/med.21593

  • 17

    GrantJ. R.EnnsE.MarinierE.MandalA.HermanE. K.ChenC. Y.et al. (2023). Proksee: in-depth characterization and visualization of bacterial genomes. Nucleic Acids Res.51, W484W492. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkad326

  • 18

    GrygorcewiczB.RoszakM.GolecP.Śleboda-TarontD.ŁubowskaN.GórskaM.et al. (2020). Antibiotics Act with vB_AbaP_AGC01 Phage against Acinetobacter baumannii in Human Heat-Inactivated Plasma Blood and Galleria mellonella Models. Int. J. Mol. Sci.21, 4390. doi: 10.3390/ijms21124390

  • 19

    GuerraM.DestroG.VieiraB.LimaA. S.FerrazL.HakanssonA. P.et al. (2022). Klebsiella pneumoniae biofilms and their role in disease pathogenesis. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol.12, 877995. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.877995

  • 20

    HanP.LinW.FanH.TongY. (2024). Characterization of phage evolution and phage resistance in drug-resistant Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. J. Virol.98, e0124923. doi: 10.1128/jvi.01249-23

  • 21

    HanP.PuM.LiY.FanH.TongY. (2023). Characterization of bacteriophage BUCT631 lytic for K1 Klebsiella pneumoniae and its therapeutic efficacy in Galleria mellonella larvae. Virol. Sin.38, 801812. doi: 10.1016/j.virs.2023.07.002

  • 22

    HanP.ZhangW.PuM.LiY.SongL.AnX.et al. (2022). Characterization of the bacteriophage BUCT603 and therapeutic potential evaluation against drug-resistant stenotrophomonas maltophilia in a mouse model. Front. Microbiol.13, 906961. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.906961

  • 23

    HuangY.HuangY.WuZ.FanZ.ZhengF.LiuY.et al. (2025). Characterization and genomic insights into bacteriophages Kpph1 and Kpph9 against hypervirulent carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae. Virulence16, 2450462. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2025.2450462

  • 24

    HungC. H.KuoC. F.WangC. H.WuC. M.TsaoN. (2011). Experimental phage therapy in treating Klebsiella pneumoniae-mediated liver abscesses and bacteremia in mice. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.55, 13581365. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01123-10

  • 25

    JinX.ChenQ.ShenF.JiangY.WuX.HuaX.et al. (2021). Resistance evolution of hypervirulent carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae ST11 during treatment with tigecycline and polymyxin. Emerg. Microbes Infect.10, 11291136. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2021.1937327

  • 26

    KellyL.JamesonE. (2024). Bacteriophage cocktail shows no toxicity and improves the survival of Galleria mellonella infected with Klebsiella spp. J. Virol.98, e0027224. doi: 10.1128/jvi.00272-24

  • 27

    KimS. G.LeeS. B.GiriS. S.KimH. J.KimS. W.KwonJ.et al. (2020). Characterization of novel erwinia amylovora jumbo bacteriophages from eneladusvirus genus. Viruses12, 1373. doi: 10.3390/v12121373

  • 28

    KimM. K.SuhG. A.CullenG. D.Perez RodriguezS.DharmarajT.ChangT.et al. (2025). Bacteriophage therapy for multidrug-resistant infections: current technologies and therapeutic approaches. J. Clin. Invest.135, e187996. doi: 10.1172/JCI187996

  • 29

    KlingJ. (2020). Get a look at Galleria. Lab. Anim. (NY)49, 6567. doi: 10.1038/s41684-020-0489-1

  • 30

    KumarS.StecherG.TamuraK. (2016). MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol.33, 18701874. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msw054

  • 31

    LaiY. C.LuM. C.HsuehP. R. (2019). Hypervirulence and carbapenem resistance: two distinct evolutionary directions that led high-risk Klebsiella pneumoniae clones to epidemic success. Expert Rev. Mol. Diagn.19, 825837. doi: 10.1080/14737159.2019.1649145

  • 32

    LatkaA.LemireS.GrimonD.DamsD.MaciejewskaB.LuT.et al. (2021). Engineering the modular receptor-binding proteins of klebsiella phages switches their capsule serotype specificity. mBio12, e00455e00421. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00455-21

  • 33

    LeiT. Y.LiaoB. B.YangL. R.WangY.ChenX. B. (2024). Hypervirulent and carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae: A global public health threat. Microbiol. Res.288, 127839. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2024.127839

  • 34

    LiY.PuM.HanP.LiM.AnX.SongL.et al. (2023). Efficacy in Galleria mellonella Larvae and Application Potential Assessment of a New Bacteriophage BUCT700 Extensively Lyse Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Microbiol. Spectr.11, e0403022. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.04030-22

  • 35

    LiM.WangH.ChenL.GuoG.LiP.MaJ.et al. (2022). Identification of a phage-derived depolymerase specific for KL47 capsule of Klebsiella pneumoniae and its therapeutic potential in mice. Virol. Sin.37, 538546. doi: 10.1016/j.virs.2022.04.005

  • 36

    LiL.ZhangZ. (2014). Isolation and characterization of a virulent bacteriophage SPW specific for Staphylococcus aureus isolated from bovine mastitis of lactating dairy cattle. Mol. Biol. Rep.41, 58295838. doi: 10.1007/s11033-014-3457-2

  • 37

    LiuB.ZhengD.ZhouS.ChenL.YangJ. (2022). VFDB 2022: a general classification scheme for bacterial virulence factors. Nucleic Acids Res.50, D912D917. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab1107

  • 38

    LoweT. M.ChanP. P. (2016). tRNAscan-SE On-line: integrating search and context for analysis of transfer RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res.44, W54W57. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw413

  • 39

    ŁubowskaN.GrygorcewiczB.Kosznik-KwaśnickaK.Zauszkiewicz-PawlakA.WęgrzynA.DołęgowskaB.et al. (2019). Characterization of the three new kayviruses and their lytic activity against multidrug-resistant staphylococcus aureus. Microorganisms7, 471. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms7100471

  • 40

    MagillD. J.SkvortsovT. A. (2023). DePolymerase Predictor (DePP): a machine learning tool for the targeted identification of phage depolymerases. BMC Bioinf.24, 208. doi: 10.1186/s12859-023-05341-w

  • 41

    Majkowska-SkrobekG.LatkaA.BerisioR.SquegliaF.MaciejewskaB.BriersY.et al. (2018). Phage-borne depolymerases decrease klebsiella pneumoniae resistance to innate defense mechanisms. Front. Microbiol.9, 2517. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02517

  • 42

    MasalaneN. S.BesterL. A.IsmailA.EssackS. Y.MbangaJ. (2025). Drug resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae from patients and hospital effluent: a correlation. BMC Microbiol.25, 284. doi: 10.1186/s12866-025-03987-5

  • 43

    MeybodiM.ForoushaniA. R.ZolfaghariM.AbdollahiA.AlipourA.MohammadnejadE.et al. (2021). Antimicrobial resistance pattern in healthcare-associated infections: investigation of in-hospital risk factors. Iran J. Microbiol.13, 178182. doi: 10.18502/ijm.v13i2.5978

  • 44

    MirzaK. A.TchatchiashviliT.MarquetM.NietzscheS.PletzM. W.MakarewiczO. (2025). Characterization and genome analysis of novel Klebsiella pneumoniae phage vbKpUKJ_2 isolated from hospital sewage water. BMC Microbiol.25, 96. doi: 10.1186/s12866-025-03813-y

  • 45

    PanY. J.LinT. L.ChenC. T.ChenY. Y.HsiehP. F.HsuC. R.et al. (2015). Genetic analysis of capsular polysaccharide synthesis gene clusters in 79 capsular types of Klebsiella spp. Sci. Rep.5, 15573. doi: 10.1038/srep15573

  • 46

    PengH.ChenI. A.QimronU. (2025). Engineering phages to fight multidrug-resistant bacteria. Chem. Rev.125, 933971. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.4c00681

  • 47

    PerticsB. Z.CoxA.NyúlA.SzamekN.KovácsT.SchneiderG. (2021). Isolation and Characterization of a Novel Lytic Bacteriophage against the K2 Capsule-Expressing Hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae Strain 52145, and Identification of Its Functional Depolymerase. Microorganisms9, 650. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9030650

  • 48

    PiresD. P.OliveiraH.MeloL. D.SillankorvaS.AzeredoJ. (2016). Bacteriophage-encoded depolymerases: their diversity and biotechnological applications. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.100, 21412151. doi: 10.1007/s00253-015-7247-0

  • 49

    PomakovaD. K.HsiaoC. B.BeananJ. M.OlsonR.MacDonaldU.KeynanY.et al. (2012). Clinical and phenotypic differences between classic and hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumonia: an emerging and under-recognized pathogenic variant. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.31, 981989. doi: 10.1007/s10096-011-1396-6

  • 50

    RahimiS.BakhtM.JavadiA.ForoughiF.MarashiS.NikkhahiF. (2023). Characterization of novel bacteriophage PSKP16 and its therapeutic potential against β-lactamase and biofilm producer strain of K2-Hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae pneumonia infection in mice model. BMC Microbiol.23, 233. doi: 10.1186/s12866-023-02979-7

  • 51

    RotmanE.McClureS.GlazierJ.Fuerte-StoneJ.FoldiJ.EraniA.et al. (2024). Rapid design of bacteriophage cocktails to suppress the burden and virulence of gut-resident carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae. Cell Host Microbe32, 19882003. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2024.09.004

  • 52

    RussoT. A.MarrC. M. (2019). Hypervirulent klebsiella pneumoniae. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.32, e00001e00019. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00001-19

  • 53

    SalmondG. P.FineranP. C. (2015). A century of the phage: past, present and future. Nat. Rev. Microbiol.13, 777786. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3564

  • 54

    SinghA. K.YadavS.ChauhanB. S.NandyN.SinghR.NeogiK.et al. (2019). Classification of Clinical Isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae Based on Their in vitro Biofilm Forming Capabilities and Elucidation of the Biofilm Matrix Chemistry With Special Reference to the Protein Content. Front. Microbiol.10, 669. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00669

  • 55

    SkurnikM.Alkalay-OrenS.BoonM.ClokieM.Sicheritz-PonténT.DąbrowskaK.et al. (2025). Phage therapy. Nat. Rev. Methods Primers5, 9. doi: 10.1038/s43586-024-00377-5

  • 56

    SödingJ.BiegertA.LupasA. N. (2005). The HHpred interactive server for protein homology detection and structure prediction. Nucleic Acids Res.33, W244W248. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki408

  • 57

    SquegliaF.MaciejewskaB.ŁątkaA.RuggieroA.BriersY.Drulis-KawaZ.et al. (2020). Structural and functional studies of a klebsiella phage capsule depolymerase tailspike: mechanistic insights into capsular degradation. Structure28, 613624.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2020.04.015

  • 58

    TabassumR.ShafiqueM.KhawajaK. A.AlviI. A.RehmanY.SheikC. S.et al. (2018). Complete genome analysis of a Siphoviridae phage TSK1 showing biofilm removal potential against Klebsiella pneumoniae. Sci. Rep.8, 17904. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-36229-y

  • 59

    TangM.HuangZ.ZhangX.KongJ.ZhouB.HanY.et al. (2023). Phage resistance formation and fitness costs of hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae mediated by K2 capsule-specific phage and the corresponding mechanisms. Front. Microbiol.14, 1156292. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1156292

  • 60

    ThiryD.PassetV.Danis-WlodarczykK.LoodC.WagemansJ.De SordiL.et al. (2019). New Bacteriophages against Emerging Lineages ST23 and ST258 of Klebsiella pneumoniae and Efficacy Assessment in Galleria mellonella Larvae. Viruses11, 411. doi: 10.3390/v11050411

  • 61

    Torres-BarcelóC.TurnerP. E.BucklingA. (2022). Mitigation of evolved bacterial resistance to phage therapy. Curr. Opin. Virol.53, 101201. doi: 10.1016/j.coviro.2022.101201

  • 62

    TsaiC. J.LohJ. M.ProftT. (2016). Galleria mellonella infection models for the study of bacterial diseases and for antimicrobial drug testing. Virulence7, 214229. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2015.1135289

  • 63

    TurnerD.ShkoporovA. N.LoodC.MillardA. D.DutilhB. E.Alfenas-ZerbiniP.et al. (2023). Abolishment of morphology-based taxa and change to binomial species names: 2022 taxonomy update of the ICTV bacterial viruses subcommittee. Arch. Virol.168, 74. doi: 10.1007/s00705-022-05694-2

  • 64

    UyttebroekS.ChenB.OnseaJ.RuythoorenF.DebaveyeY.DevolderD.et al. (2022). Safety and efficacy of phage therapy in difficult-to-treat infections: a systematic review. Lancet Infect. Dis.22, e208e220. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00612-5

  • 65

    VolozhantsevN. V.BorzilovA. I.ShpirtA. M.KrasilnikovaV. M.VerevkinV. V.DenisenkoE. A.et al. (2022). Comparison of the therapeutic potential of bacteriophage KpV74 and phage-derived depolymerase (β-glucosidase) against Klebsiella pneumoniae capsular type K2. Virus Res.322, 198951. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2022.198951

  • 66

    WangZ.YangX.WangH.WangS.FangR.LiX.et al. (2024). Characterization and efficacy against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii of a novel Friunavirus phage from sewage. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol.14, 1382145. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1382145

  • 67

    WangG.ZhaoG.ChaoX.XieL.WangH. (2020). The characteristic of virulence, biofilm and antibiotic resistance of klebsiella pneumoniae. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health17, 6278. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17176278

  • 68

    WuY.WangR.XuM.LiuY.ZhuX.QiuJ.et al. (2019). A Novel Polysaccharide Depolymerase Encoded by the Phage SH-KP152226 Confers Specific Activity Against Multidrug-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae via Biofilm Degradation. Front. Microbiol.10, 2768. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02768

  • 69

    WyresK. L.LamM.HoltK. E. (2020). Population genomics of Klebsiella pneumoniae. Nat. Rev. Microbiol.18, 344359. doi: 10.1038/s41579-019-0315-1

  • 70

    XuL.LiJ.WuW.WuX.RenJ. (2024). Klebsiella pneumoniae capsular polysaccharide: Mechanism in regulation of synthesis, virulence, and pathogenicity. Virulence15, 2439509. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2024.2439509

  • 71

    YakubovskijV. I.MorozovaV. V.KozlovaY. N.TikunovA. Y.FedoretsV. A.ZhirakovskayaE. V.et al. (2025). Phage vB_KlebPS_265 Active Against Resistant/MDR and Hypermucoid K2 Strains of Klebsiella pneumoniae. Viruses17, 83. doi: 10.3390/v17010083

  • 72

    YangH.GouZ.YuanH.YueX.LuS.FuZ. (2023). Employment of the phage cocktail as a species-specific recognition agent for wide-spectrum detection of bacterial strains. Anal. Chem.95, 1000810016. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.3c01313

  • 73

    YangX.SunQ.LiJ.JiangY.LiY.LinJ.et al. (2022). Molecular epidemiology of carbapenem-resistant hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae in China. Emerg. Microbes Infect.11, 841849. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2022.2049458

  • 74

    YaoM.ZhuY.DuanJ. A.XiaoP. (2025). Phage therapy: A novel approach to combat drug-resistant pathogens. Microbiol. Res.298, 128228. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2025.128228

  • 75

    YeM.TuJ.JiangJ.BiY.YouW.ZhangY.et al. (2016). Clinical and genomic analysis of liver abscess-causing klebsiella pneumoniae identifies new liver abscess-associated virulence genes. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol.6, 165. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2016.00165

  • 76

    ZhaoR.JiangS.RenS.YangL.HanW.GuoZ.et al. (2024). A novel phage putative depolymerase, Depo16, has specific activity against K1 capsular-type Klebsiella pneumoniae. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.90, e0119723. doi: 10.1128/aem.01197-23

Summary

Keywords

Klebsiella pneumoniae, phage HHU1, biological properties, phage therapy, drug-resistant

Citation

Han P, Sun S, Wen L, Yang L, Li E and Yang Y (2025) Isolation, characterization and therapeutic evaluation of phage HHU1 against K2 Klebsiella pneumoniae. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 15:1668727. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1668727

Received

18 July 2025

Accepted

04 September 2025

Published

30 September 2025

Volume

15 - 2025

Edited by

Masmudur Mohammed Rahman, Arizona State University, United States

Reviewed by

Mansura Sherif Mulani, Huvepharma SEA (Pune) Private Limited, India

Qipeng Cheng, Anhui Normal University, China

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Lei Yang, ; Enzhong Li, ; Yang Yang,

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics