Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.

Sec. Clinical Infectious Diseases

Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1670219

This article is part of the Research TopicNeglected Tropical Diseases: Drug Targets, and Potential TreatmentsView all 5 articles

Identification of Dominant Peptide Epitopes and Antibody Response to the Spike Protein of SARS-CoV-2

Provisionally accepted
Xianyan  ZhangXianyan Zhang1Peipei  XuPeipei Xu1Ting  XiaoTing Xiao2Xinlu  WangXinlu Wang3Xuemin  GuoXuemin Guo1,2*
  • 1Clinical laboratory center, Meizhou People's Hospital, Meizhou, Guangdong, China
  • 2Guangdong Engineering Technological Research Center of Clinical Molecular Diagnosis and Antibody Drugs, Meizhou, Guangdong, China
  • 3State Key Laboratory of Biomacromolecules, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Objective: Multiple antigenic epitopes are present in the spike (S) protein of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), but they exhibit significant variation in immunogenicity and reactogenicity. We aimed to investigate the reactivity of different SARS-CoV-2 antigenic epitopes with serum antibodies from patients with COVID-19 and vaccinated individuals to characterize specific antibody responses. Methods: Linear B-cell peptides derived from the SARS-CoV-2 S protein were screened using the Immune Epitope Database (IEDB). These linear peptides were coupled to bovine serum albumin (BSA), and blot hybridization was used to investigate antigen–antibody reactions among the peptides, commercial anti-S protein polyclonal antibodies, and sera derived from vaccinated individuals and those with confirmed COVID-19. Sera from unvaccinated patients and BSA served as controls. Results: Six linear B-cell peptide epitopes were identified from the IEDB and designated as P1–P6. Among these, P6 (aa 809–826) demonstrated stronger reactivity with rabbit anti-SARS-CoV-2 S polyclonal antibodies than the others. Antibodies against P2 (aa 553–570) were detected in the early stages of infection in four patients with confirmed COVID-19, and two of them developed antibodies against P5 (aa 601–640) later during the middle or late stages. Antibody responses against P1 (aa 209–226), P3 (aa 769–786), P4 (aa 287–317), and P6 were either extremely weak or undetected in patients with confirmed COVID-19. Sera from 45 individuals immunized with the inactivated vaccine were tested for reactivity against the six peptides. Antibody signals against P2, P5, and P6 were detected either individually or in combination, with P2 showing the highest frequency, followed by P6 and P5. Antibodies against P1, P3, and P4 were not detected. Six predicted B-cell dominant peptides exhibited distinct immunogenicity and reactogenicity, with P2 (aa 553–570) eliciting the strongest response. Antibody profiles against S protein epitopes differed between individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2 and those vaccinated with inactivated vaccines. Conclusion: The peptide combination of P2, P5, and P6 shows potential for the development of peptide-based target antigens for SARS-CoV-2 serological antibody diagnostic reagents, and reveals the response patterns of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2.

Keywords: SARS-CoV-21, spike protein2, dominant peptide epitopes3, inactivatedvaccine4, antibody response5

Received: 21 Jul 2025; Accepted: 30 Sep 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Zhang, Xu, Xiao, Wang and Guo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Xuemin Guo, guoxuemin@mzrmyy.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.