Daniele Alberoni
Diana DiGioiaEditorial on the Research Topic
Impact of landscape and feeding on the bees’ gut microbiome shaping and pathogens development
Bees are pivotal for the stability of ecosystems and agricultural productivity, yet their health is constantly challenged by a variety of stressors. Among these, impactful bee pathogens such as Nosema spp., Crithidia spp., and numerous viruses have spread globally, facilitated by the international trade of pollinators (Smith et al., 2013; Graystock et al., 2013), but also by spillover and spillback dynamics between wild and managed pollinators in natural and anthropogenic landscapes (Proesmans et al., 2021). Pathogen spread is further promoted by landscape simplification and intensive agricultural practices that reduce the availability and diversity of floral resources (Figueroa et al., 2020) and biodiversity. In such agroecosystems, the limited floral resources available may be contaminated with pathogens (Figueroa et al., 2019), contributing to a faster pathogens spread. In this context, the spread of bee pathogens may occur directly through contact with contaminated habitats, or indirectly via biodiversity loss that alters the host–pathogen interactions (Fearon et al., 2023), thereby adding complexity to pollinator health dynamics.
Recently, the gut microbiome has emerged as a central determinant of resilience, providing essential functions for nutrition, immunity, and protection against pathogens (Raymann and Moran, 2018). Environmental changes and their impact on the forage resources, interact with host-associated microbial communities, influencing the bee fitness and their immune response (Braglia et al., 2025) but also the development and virulence of pathogens (Di Pasquale et al., 2013; Giacomini et al., 2018). Understanding these interactions is therefore crucial to address pollinator decline and safeguard ecosystem services.
Climate change further complicates this scenario. Altered flowering phenology and changes in the nutritional quality of pollen and nectar may compromise pollinator diets and the acquisition of beneficial microorganisms from the environment. These shifts can weaken host defenses and reduce their longevity, with cascading effects on crop production, wild plant reproduction, and ultimately global food security.
The articles collected in this Research Topic provide new insights into how nutrition, microbial balance, and environmental factors modulating bee pathogens development and the reciprocal influence between disease and microbiota. Collectively, they show that the gut microbiome does not act in isolation but is embedded within broader ecological networks that connect bees, their environment, and the pathogens they host.
Braglia et al. demonstrated that the opportunistic bacterium Serratia marcescens, although typically present at low levels in the bee gut, can cross the intestinal barrier and cause septicemia, with virulence exacerbated when co-infecting with Vairimorpha (Nosema) ceranae in laboratory conditions. The study further highlighted how environmental microorganisms such as Apilactobacillus kunkeei, often populating flowers and bee environments (Neveling et al., 2012; Garrido et al., 2024), may reduce both Serratia and V. ceranae, underscoring the role of microbial interactions in controlling pathogen development.
Wei and Huang focused on the evolutionary ecology of N. ceranae, comparing its infection in Apis cerana and Apis mellifera. Their inoculation experiments revealed a distinct trade-off: in A. mellifera the parasite proliferates extensively, producing high spore loads but causing relatively low host mortality, whereas in A. cerana it induces markedly higher mortality despite generating fewer spores. Transcriptomic analyses further showed a stronger suppression of host gene expression in A. cerana, particularly in immune pathways. These findings suggest that N. ceranae is adapted for high proliferation with low virulence in A. mellifera, while maintaining higher virulence but limited transmission potential in A. cerana, highlighting the complex trade-offs of parasite evolution in a multi-host system
Sgroi et al. provided an epidemiological overview from Italy, documenting the widespread occurrence of both Nosema apis and N. ceranae in bees, pollen, and honey. The study showed higher infection risks in high-impact areas subject to intensive anthropogenic pressures. Molecular analyses revealed that N. apis sequences were uniform, while N. ceranae exhibited four distinct sequence types characterized by single nucleotide polymorphisms, indicating high haplotype diversity but low nucleotide diversity. This genetic pattern points to recent population expansion and suggests ongoing adaptation of N. ceranae to local environments. The study underscores the strong link between pathogen prevalence and environmental quality, emphasizing the need for continuous surveillance and monitoring.
Finally, Weinhold et al. investigated the bumble bee Bombus terrestris and showed how outdoor exposure leads to a temporal succession in the gut microbiota, with increasing abundance of lactic acid bacteria and a parallel decline of core taxa such as Snodgrassella and Gilliamella. Interestingly, flower diversity per se did not strongly affect microbial progression, but environmental exposure was sufficient to trigger diversification. This work reinforces the concept that the gut microbiota is dynamically shaped by the environment and not merely by diet composition.
Collectively, the contributions in this Research Topic underscore that bee health cannot be understood in isolation from its ecological and nutritional context. Nutrition, feeding practices, and pathogen dynamics are tightly interlinked and modulated by environmental conditions. Rather than considering the landscape merely as a mosaic of floral resources, it becomes necessary to view it as an integrated system where climate, habitat management, feeding regimes, and microbial interactions converge to shape bee resilience.
Against this background, the microbiome of the gut becomes an intermediary, balancing landscape and diet impacts on immunity and susceptibility to pathogens. The experiments compiled here attempt to demonstrate that feeding and landscape simplification, or alterations in floral resources all have discernible impacts on microbial equilibrium and pathogen development, virulence and disease dynamics. They also point up the promise of microbial friends and feeding interventions in blunting pathogen pressure.
Taken together, this Research Topic contributes to demonstrate that bee resilience is inseparable from environmental integrity and nutritional quality. Feeding regime, microbial richness and pathogen evolution work together, impacting pollinator and ecosystem stability. Future studies should therefore shed light on microbiota–pathogen interaction under different feeding and landscape scenarios, and experimentally test interventions, from microbial augmentation to landscape management, able to ensure bee well-being under rapidly changing circumstances.
Author contributions
DA: Writing – original draft, Conceptualization, Supervision. DD: Writing – review & editing.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declare that Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript. The authors used generative AI tools to improve the readability of the document and correct typos in the text.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Braglia, C., Rudelli, C., Tinti, A., Bocquet, M., Isani, G., Bulet, P., et al. (2025). Unravelling pollen diet and microbiome influence on honey bee health. Sci. Rep. 15 (1), 13474.
Di Pasquale, G., Salignon, M., Le Conte, Y., Belzunces, L. P., Decourtye, A., Kretzschmar, A., et al. (2013). Influence of pollen nutrition on honey bee health: do pollen quality and diversity matter?. PLoS One 8 (8), e72016. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0072016
Fearon, M. L., Wood, C. L., and Tibbetts, E. A. (2023). Habitat quality influences pollinator pathogen prevalence through both habitat–disease and biodiversity–disease pathways. Ecology 104 (2), e3933. doi:10.1002/ecy.3933
Figueroa, L. L., Blinder, M., Grincavitch, C., Jelinek, A., Mann, E. K., Merva, L. A., et al. (2019). Bee pathogen transmission dynamics: deposition, persistence and acquisition on flowers. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 286 (1903), 20190603.
Figueroa, L. L., Grab, H., Ng, W. H., Myers, C. R., Graystock, P., McFrederick, Q. S., and McArt, S. H. (2020). Landscape simplification shapes pathogen prevalence in plant–pollinator networks. Ecol. Lett. 23 (8), 1212–1222.
Garrido, P. M., Porrini, M. P., Alberoni, D., Baffoni, L., Scott, D., Mifsud, D., et al. (2024). Beneficial bacteria and plant extracts promote honey bee health and reduce Nosema ceranae infection. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins 16 (1), 259–274.
Giacomini, J. J., Leslie, J., Tarpy, D. R., Palmer-Young, E. C., Irwin, R. E., and Adler, L. S. (2018). Medicinal value of sunflower pollen against bee pathogens. Sci. Rep. 8 (1), 14394.
Graystock, P., Yates, K., Evison, S. E., Darvill, B., Goulson, D., and Hughes, W. O. (2013). The Trojan hives: pollinator pathogens, imported and distributed in bumblebee colonies. J. Appl. Ecol. 50 (5), 1207–1215. doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12134
Neveling, D. P., Endo, A., and Dicks, L. M. (2012). Fructophilic Lactobacillus kunkeei and Lactobacillus brevis isolated from fresh flowers, bees and bee-hives. Curr. Microbiol. 65 (5), 507–515.
Proesmans, W., Albrecht, M., Gajda, A., Neumann, P., Paxton, R. J., Pioz, M., et al. (2021). Pathways for novel epidemiology: plant–pollinator–pathogen networks and global change. Trends Ecol. Evol. 36 (7), 623–636. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2021.02.021
Raymann, K. and Moran, N. A. (2018). The role of the gut microbiome in health and disease of adult honey bee workers. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 26, 97–104.
Keywords: microbiome, pathogen dynamics, landscape simplification, feeding practices, floral resources, climate change
Citation: Alberoni D and DiGioia D (2025) Editorial: Impact of landscape and feeding on the bees’ gut microbiome shaping and pathogens development. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 15:1688273. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1688273
Received: 18 August 2025; Accepted: 19 September 2025;
Published: 10 October 2025.
Edited and reviewed by:
Alain Stintzi, University of Ottawa, CanadaCopyright © 2025 Alberoni and DiGioia. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Daniele Alberoni, ZGFuaWVsZS5hbGJlcm9uaUB1bmliby5pdA==