Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.

Sec. Clinical and Diagnostic Microbiology and Immunology

Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1689728

This article is part of the Research TopicAcute Pancreatitis Infection: Epidemiology, Prevention, Clinical Characteristics, Treatment, and Prediction: Volume IIView all 6 articles

Infected Necrotizing Pancreatitis: Clinical Features, Microbial Patterns, and Outcomes in a Saudi Tertiary Center

Provisionally accepted
  • King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Infected necrotizing pancreatitis (INP) is a severe complication of acute pancreatitis (AP) associated with high morbidity and mortality, yet regional data remain limited. We retrospectively reviewed 119 patients admitted with AP to King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, between 2017 and 2025 to characterize risk factors, microbiological profiles, and management strategies. Of them, 21 patients (17.6%) developed INP. Compared with patients with noninfected AP, they were older (mean 60.1 ± 11.2 years, p < 0.05), were more frequently overweight or obese (85.7% ≥25 kg/m², p = 0.03), and had higher severity scores (Bedside Index for Severity in Acute Pancreatitis ≥3 in 61.9%, p < 0.01). These baseline differences could explain outcomes rather than infection status. Gallstones (42.9%) and exposure to glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists (4.8%) were associated with INP. Radiologic imaging confirmed necrosis in all cases, including five abscesses. Of the 21 INP cases, 19 were confirmed by positive cultures from fine-needle aspiration (FNA), drainage, or necrosectomy and 2 by imaging (gas in necrotic collections) plus blood cultures. Microbiological cultures obtained from FNA, drainage, or necrosectomy most commonly identified Escherichia coli (42.9%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (23.8%), with multidrug resistance detected in one-third of cases. Management strategies included conservative therapy (n = 8), percutaneous drainage (n = 4), endoscopic necrosectomy (n = 5), and surgical necrosectomy (n = 4). Complications included pancreatic fistula, colonic perforation, and sepsis, with an overall mortality rate of 9.5%. Antibiotics were culture-directed in INP but frequently used prophylactically in severe noninfected AP. Early enteral nutrition was implemented in most infected cases. These preliminary findings—limited by a small sample size, single-center design, and a bias toward severe cases— require validation in larger studies; nevertheless, they suggest that older age, obesity, severe presentation, and multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae are defining features of INP in this cohort, and they underscore the importance of antibiotic stewardship and early nutritional support in regional clinical practice.

Keywords: acute pancreatitis, Infected necrotizing pancreatitis, Multidrug-resistant bacteria, GLP-1 agonists, antibiotic stewardship, Enteral Nutrition

Received: 20 Aug 2025; Accepted: 29 Sep 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Abulfaraj. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Moaz Abulfaraj, mabolafaraj@kau.edu.sa

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.