ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Commun.

Sec. Science and Environmental Communication

Volume 10 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fcomm.2025.1557633

Pork Production on YouTube: Frame and Sentiment Analysis

Provisionally accepted
Anu  KarkiAnu Karki1*Shuyang  QuShuyang Qu1Fally  Masambuka-KanchewaFally Masambuka-Kanchewa1Michael  RetallickMichael Retallick1Alexa  LammAlexa Lamm2Kevan  W LammKevan W Lamm2Catherine  SandersCatherine Sanders3Allison  ByrdAllison Byrd2Nicholas  GablerNicholas Gabler4
  • 1Department of Agricultural Education and Studies, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Iowa State University, Ames, United States
  • 2Department of Agricultural Leadership, Education and Communications, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, United States
  • 3Department of Agricultural and Human Sciences, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
  • 4Department of Animal Science, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Introduction: Social media platforms increasingly influence public perceptions of agriculture by shaping narratives around food production. This study explores the portrayal of pork production on YouTube and the corresponding audience reactions, highlighting its role in shaping public discourse.Guided by the framing theory, the research examines 147 videos and 735 top comments to analyze media and audience frames alongside sentiments. Video titles, descriptions, and thumbnails represent media frames, while the top comments reflect audience frames. Frames are identified through literature review and sample analysis, with selected videos manually coded for frame presence. Sentiment analysis of textual elements is conducted using MaxQDA, and visual elements are coded manually.Results: Findings show that information and technology of pork production, and entrepreneurship frames dominate media portrayals, emphasizing information sharing on production practices and business ventures. In contrast, audience responses often highlighted ethical concerns, particularly animal welfare, underscoring moral sensitivity in public discourse. Positive sentiments were prevalent across media and audience responses, though critical views remained significant. The strong alignment between media and audience frames and sentiments underscores the influence of strategic framing in shaping perceptions. Emotional appeals in videos are found to play a critical role in audience reactions.Discussion: These findings suggest that transparent communication emphasizing ethical practices and technological advancements can effectively engage audiences. By aligning content with audience values and leveraging emotional connections, communicators can counteract misinformation, foster trust, and promote informed discussions about the pork industry. This study provides a framework for utilizing social media, specifically YouTube, to address public concerns while advancing transparency and trust in agricultural practices.

Keywords: Pork production, youtube, framing theory, Media frame, Audience frame, visual framing, sentiment analysis

Received: 08 Jan 2025; Accepted: 05 Jun 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Karki, Qu, Masambuka-Kanchewa, Retallick, Lamm, Lamm, Sanders, Byrd and Gabler. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Anu Karki, Department of Agricultural Education and Studies, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Iowa State University, Ames, United States

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.